Pre-Test Treatment Post-Test Method of Collecting Data

30 J B = Number of all students in the lower group The criteria of the computation are as follow: Interval Criteria D 0.20 Poor 0.20 D 0.40 Satisfactory 0.40 D 0.70 Good 0.70 D 1.00 Excellent

3.6.2 Pre-Test

Pre test was conducted before I gave the treatment. This test has purpose to know the initial ability of the students especially in reading and writing hortatory exposition text. This test consisted of two forms which were multiple choices and essay. The students would be asked to do the test in a given time 90 minutes. The students who were asked to do the test were the students of both groups, experimental and control groups.

3.6.3 Treatment

After conducting the pre-test, the next steps in conducting the experimental was giving the treatments. Both groups were given the treatments, but there was a prominent difference in the treatment itself. The experimental group got the treatment using CIRC method in reading and writing material. On the other hand, the control group got the treatment using conventional technique. Table 3.2 Criteria of Discriminating Power 31

3.6.4 Post-Test

This is the last steps in conducting the experiment. After administering the pre test and treatments, I must conduct the post test. This test aimed to know the students’ ability in reading and writing hortatory exposition text after getting the treatment.

3.7 Method of Analyzing Data

After getting the data, I had to analyze the data by using several ways. In this research, the method of data analyzing used were scoring technique and classifying the score.

3.7.1 Scoring Technique

In this research, I would take the score of students in the form of multiple choice and essay. For the multiple choice items, the scoring was only counting the correct answer discrete point test. In the other hand, in the writing test, I would take the score based on students’ writing production to measure the progress. The aspects of the scoring writing are grammar, vocabulary, spelling, content, and fluency. There is the scoring technique of writing skills based on Heaton quoted by Sutirah 2009: 30-2. Items Scoring Grammar 5 Mastery on grammar taught on course, only 1 or2 minor mistakes. 4 A few minor mistakes only preposition, article, etc. 3 Only one major mistake but few minor mistakes. 2 Major mistakes that lead to difficulty in understanding, lack mastery of sentence construction. 1 Numerous serious mistakes, no mastery of sentence construction, almost intelligible.

Dokumen yang terkait

THE EFFECT OF USING COOPERATIVE INTEGRATED READING AND COMPOSITION (CIRC) METHOD ON THE EIGHTH YEAR STUDENTS’ READING COMPREHENSION AND WRITING ACHIEVEMENT AT SMPN SUKORAMBI JEMBER

0 3 15

The Effect of Using Cooperative Integrated Reading and Composition (CIRC) Model on the Eighth Year Students’ Reading Comprehension and Writing Achievement at SMPN Sukorambi Jember

0 9 15

EMPLOYING QUESTION – ANSWER RELATIONSHIPS (QAR) STRATEGY TO IMPROVE STUDENTS’ READING COMPREHENSION (A Classroom Action Research at the Eleventh Year Students of SMA Negeri 1 Rangkasbitung in 2012/2013 Academic Year)

5 22 256

THE EFFECT OF COOPERATIVE INTEGRATED READING AND COMPOSITION (CIRC) ON STUDENTS` READING COMPREHENSION ACHIEVEMENT IN NARRATIVE TEXT.

0 4 21

THE EFFECT OF USING COOPERATIVE INTEGRATED READING AND COMPOSITION ( CIRC ) METHOD ON STUDENTS` READING COMPREHENSION ACHIEVEMENT ON RECOUNT TEXT.

0 3 21

THE EFFECT OF USING COOPERATIVE INTEGRATED READING AND COMPOSITION ON STUDENTS READING COMPREHENSION.

0 2 14

THE USE OF SHARED-READING STRATEGY TO IMPROVE STUDENTS’ READING COMPREHENSION.

0 3 72

THE USE OF CIRC (COOPERATIVE INTEGRATED READING AND COMPOSITION ) IN ENHANCING STUDENTS’ ABILITY IN READING SKILL.

0 0 1

THE EFFECT OF COOPERATIVE INTEGRATED READING AND COMPOSITION (CIRC) ON STUDENTS’ READING COMPREHENSION AT THE EIGHT GRADE OF SMPN 11 MATARM

0 0 14

THE EFFECT OF COOPERATIVE INTEGRATED READING AND COMPOSITION (CIRC) TECHNIQUE TOWARDS STUDENTS’ READING COMPREHENSION OF SMPN 21 PEKANBAR

0 1 10