Fishery effects within Direct effects Known direct effects are Indirect effects

Document: MSC Pre-Assessment Reporting Template page 62 Date of issue: 15 th August 2011 © Marine Stewardship Council, 2011 Component ETP Species PI 2.3.1 Outcome Status The fishery meets national and international requirements for protection of ETP species. The fishery does not pose a risk of serious or irreversible harm to ETP species and does not hinder recovery of ETP species. Scoring issues SG60 SG80 SG100

a. Fishery effects within

limits Known effects of the fishery are likely to be within limits of national and international requirements for protection of ETP species. The effects of the fishery are known and are highly likely to be within limits of national and international requirements for protection of ETP species. There is a high degree of certainty that the effects of the fishery are within limits of national and international requirements for protection of ETP species.

b. Direct effects Known direct effects are

unlikely to create unacceptable impacts to ETP species. Direct effects are highly unlikely to create unacceptable impacts to ETP species. There is a high degree of confidence that there are no significant detrimental direct effects of the fishery on ETP species.

c. Indirect effects

Indirect effects have been considered and are thought to be unlikely to create unacceptable impacts. There is a high degree of confidence that there are no significant detrimental indirect effects of the fishery on ETP species. JustificationRationale Protected Species are specified in the Wildlife Reservation and Protection Act B.E. 1992. Notifications also prohibit the catch of dolphins, turtles and whale sharks. Gillnet: There are some turtle bycatch interactions with crab gill nets but it is unclear whether these contribute to unacceptable impacts on the species status, or whether catches are occasional or not. The likelihood is that these are low, but this requires further verification. However, it is more likely that other gears may well have a highly significant impact on the populations. There is some quantitative assessment of interactions between gillnets and turtles at the village level, where DMCR sponsored conservation groups have been created, and are seen to report turtle interactions regularly DMCR, 2011. A fishery will not fail if there are turtle actions. The Strategy, which there is has to demonstrate that it is working. Trap and Gillnet: There may also be some interactions between long boat engines and dugongs. Anecdotal information suggested other limited interactions if at all with dugongs, especially as most fishing occurred outside dugong habitat sea grass. It is not clearly known whether direct effects are unlikely to create unacceptable impacts. TRAP Likely Scoring Level passpass with conditionfail Border line between FAIL and PASS with a condition GILLNET Border line between FAIL and Pass with a condition Document: MSC Pre-Assessment Reporting Template page 63 Date of issue: 15 th August 2011 © Marine Stewardship Council, 2011 Component ETP Species PI 2.3.2 Management strategy The fishery has in place precautionary management strategies designed to: - meet national and international requirements; - ensure the fishery does not pose a risk of serious or irreversible harm to ETP species; - ensure the fishery does not hinder recovery of ETP species; and - minimise mortality of ETP species. Scoring issues SG60 SG80 SG100

a. Management strategy in