Item Validity Reliability The Result Analysis of Reading

39

4.2.1.1 Item Validity

Validity refers to the extent to which inferences made from assessment results are appropriate, meaningful, and useful in terms of the purpose of the assessment. In the computation of item validity in pre-test, the validity index of number 22 is 0.66. Then I consulted the table of r with N = 36 and significance level = 5 is 0.338788. Since the result of the computation is higher than r in the table, the index validity of item number 22 is considered to be valid. While in the computation of item validity in post-test, the validity index of number 3 is 0.81. Since the result of the computation is higher than r in the table, the index validity of item number 1 is considered to be valid. See in Appendix Based on the computation of all items, there was no item which is invalid on the try-out test for pre-test in the other word, all items are valid. On the other hand, there was 1 item which is invalid in the try out test for post-test. It is the item number 11. Therefore, the other items would be used in the test. Since there were 29 valid items, I used 25 items for the pre-test and post-test based on the consideration of level of difficulty and the aspects of reading comprehension.

4.2.1.2 Reliability

Similar to validity, reliability is also the characteristics of a good test. Reliability is meant the stability of test scores. A reliable test is consistent and dependable. If the test is given to the same students on two different occasions, the test will show similar results. The reliability of the test was calculated from the number of items, the means of scores, and the total of variants. A test is considered to be 40 reliable if r 11 result of calculation is higher than r in the table 0.338788. From the calculation for significance level 5 and the number of students is 36, the result was 0.96. Since the r 11 is higher than r table , the test was considered to be reliable. Meanwhile, in the try out of post-test, the result was 0.95. Therefore, it is also considered to be reliable.

4.2.1.3 Level of Difficulty

Dokumen yang terkait

THE EFFECT OF USING COOPERATIVE INTEGRATED READING AND COMPOSITION (CIRC) METHOD ON THE EIGHTH YEAR STUDENTS’ READING COMPREHENSION AND WRITING ACHIEVEMENT AT SMPN SUKORAMBI JEMBER

0 3 15

The Effect of Using Cooperative Integrated Reading and Composition (CIRC) Model on the Eighth Year Students’ Reading Comprehension and Writing Achievement at SMPN Sukorambi Jember

0 9 15

EMPLOYING QUESTION – ANSWER RELATIONSHIPS (QAR) STRATEGY TO IMPROVE STUDENTS’ READING COMPREHENSION (A Classroom Action Research at the Eleventh Year Students of SMA Negeri 1 Rangkasbitung in 2012/2013 Academic Year)

5 22 256

THE EFFECT OF COOPERATIVE INTEGRATED READING AND COMPOSITION (CIRC) ON STUDENTS` READING COMPREHENSION ACHIEVEMENT IN NARRATIVE TEXT.

0 4 21

THE EFFECT OF USING COOPERATIVE INTEGRATED READING AND COMPOSITION ( CIRC ) METHOD ON STUDENTS` READING COMPREHENSION ACHIEVEMENT ON RECOUNT TEXT.

0 3 21

THE EFFECT OF USING COOPERATIVE INTEGRATED READING AND COMPOSITION ON STUDENTS READING COMPREHENSION.

0 2 14

THE USE OF SHARED-READING STRATEGY TO IMPROVE STUDENTS’ READING COMPREHENSION.

0 3 72

THE USE OF CIRC (COOPERATIVE INTEGRATED READING AND COMPOSITION ) IN ENHANCING STUDENTS’ ABILITY IN READING SKILL.

0 0 1

THE EFFECT OF COOPERATIVE INTEGRATED READING AND COMPOSITION (CIRC) ON STUDENTS’ READING COMPREHENSION AT THE EIGHT GRADE OF SMPN 11 MATARM

0 0 14

THE EFFECT OF COOPERATIVE INTEGRATED READING AND COMPOSITION (CIRC) TECHNIQUE TOWARDS STUDENTS’ READING COMPREHENSION OF SMPN 21 PEKANBAR

0 1 10