Use of precautionary Transparency of decision- MCS implementa-

Document: MSC Pre-Assessment Reporting Template page 74 Date of issue: 15 th August 2011 © Marine Stewardship Council, 2011 Likely Scoring Level passpass with conditionfail NO PASS Component Fishery- specific management system PI 3.2.2 Decision- making processes The fishery-specific management system includes effective decision-making processes that result in measures and strategies to achieve the objectives. Scoring issues SG60 SG80 SG100

a. Decision- making

processes There are some decision- making processes in place that result in measures and strategies to achieve the fishery-specific objectives. There are established decision-making processes that result in measures and strategies to achieve the fishery-specific objectives.

b. Responsive- ness of

decision- making processes Decision-making processes respond to serious issues identified in relevant research, monitoring, evaluation and consultation, in a transparent, timely and adaptive manner and take some account of the wider implications of decisions. Decision-making processes respond to serious and other important issues identified in relevant research, monitoring, evaluation and consultation, in a transparent, timely and adaptive manner and take account of the wider implications of decisions. Decision-making processes respond to all issues identified in relevant research, monitoring, evaluation and consultation, in a transparent, timely and adaptive manner and take account of the wider implications of decisions.

c. Use of precautionary

approach Decision-making processes use the precautionary approach and are based on best available information.

d. Transparency of decision-

making Explanations are provided for any actions or lack of action associated with findings and relevant recommendations emerging from research, monitoring, evaluation and review activity. Formal reporting to all interested stakeholders describes how the management system responded to findings and relevant recommendations emerging from research, monitoring, evaluation and review activity. JustificationRationale There are formal decision making processes applied by DoF. However, in the case of the blue swimming crab trap and gillnet fisheries, they are clearly not responding to relevant research. The precautionary approach to fisheries management is not being applied. There are no explanations of decisions taken, or for that matter why management decisions are not made for the crab fleets. Likely Scoring Level passpass with conditionfail NO PASS Document: MSC Pre-Assessment Reporting Template page 75 Date of issue: 15 th August 2011 © Marine Stewardship Council, 2011 Component Fishery- specific management system PI 3.2.3 Compliance and enforcement Mo itori g, co trol a d sur eilla ce echa is s e sure the fishery’s a age e t easures are enforced and complied with. Scoring issues SG60 SG80 SG100

a. MCS implementa-

tion Monitoring, control and surveillance mechanisms exist, are implemented in the fishery under assessment and there is a reasonable expectation that they are effective. A monitoring, control and surveillance system has been implemented in the fishery under assessment and has demonstrated an ability to enforce relevant management measures, strategies andor rules. A comprehensive monitoring, control and surveillance system has been implemented in the fishery under assessment and has demonstrated a consistent ability to enforce relevant management measures, strategies andor rules.

b. Sanctions Sanctions to deal with