Research Participants RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

31 -the designed materials Are the tasks well elaborated? Are the pictures interesting enough? Does it suit the students’ level? Is Task- Based Learning developed in the materials? 2. What are the students’ responses to the implementation of the designed materials? - Is the topic interesting? - Is the implementation interesting? -Do the students enjoy join this course? -Do the students want to learn English more? -Are the activities interesting? -Do the students get bored? Students Questionnaire

E. Data Analysis Technique

Data analysis is a process to shift, organize, summarize and synthesize the data to arrive at some results and conclusion of the research Selinger and Shohamy, 1989: 201. Data from questionnaire and interview were analyzed to find out the students’ needs about the activity of this course. The conclusion was made related to the data gathering. The research questions will be analyzed by using the central tendency. To get the data about evaluation of acceptable evaluation and materials, the formula would be used: 32 The Mean M is the average point X which is obtained by counting the sum of the score ∑X then it is divided by the number of subjects N. The formula is:     M = the average points ∑X = the sum of the score N = the number of subject The estimation of the participants’ opinions on the designed materials used five points of agreement and disagreement namely: 1: if the participants strongly disagree with the statement 2: if the participants disagree with the statement 3: if the participants neither agree nor disagree with the statement 4: if the participants agree with the statement 5: if the participants strongly agree with the statement The data were presented in the form of table in which the participants opinions, statements, and the mean. Statements No Participants opinion 1 2 3 4 5 N Mean The data showed whether the designed materials were good, acceptable or not. 1.01 – 2.50 = poorly design and not acceptable 2.51 – 3.50 = good design but needs revisions 3.51 – 5.00 = good design and acceptable