Shelley's Prometheus Unbound Free ebook download
Shelley's Prometheus
Unbound A
VARIORUM EDITION
SHELLEY'S
PrometheusUnbound
A
VARIORUM
EDITION
EDITED Zillman
BY Lawrence John
19S9
Press ofUniversity Washington
SEATTLE
Copyright 1959
by the University of Wanhington !**
Second printing, with corrections, 1960
Library of Congress Catalog Card
Number* 50-90M
PRINTED IN
THE UNITED STATES OF
AMEfilCA
Preface
I IT WAS EAULY in work on volume that read the commentthe present
my
of S. Hillard to the
Todd
(1345) with respect
George 1805 Henry James
edition called
is what is a variorum
of Spenser's works; "This technically , . . of all editors. edition, containing a reprint the labours of the previous
is in There
trouble is often wasted a great deal of learned rubbish it; much in what is and really difficult elucidating plain, points are frequently in
I,
silence" (Hillard, passed by Spenser* v-vi).
It
soon became evident that was not his without Shelley, like 9 ' Spenser, tribute
which have led to
of "learned rubbish,
may Douglas Bush suggest is
that "one the effect on his
about he has
of the worst things Shelley
all to
of them are reduced a common admirers; nearly denominator, of
is which the outward evidence the
perhaps a wild glitter in
eye" (My-
in at
But the case of Pronmtlieus least,
thology, p. 156) Unbound* the judg- of Kenneth Neil in and
ment Cameron is, the main, both true
pertinent; views it should
"The on Prometheus
[the results, divergence of Unbound]
from critical but from
be emphasized, not difficulty.caprice genuine
is one of the
Pmmethem Unboundunquestionably
most profound and
difference in its
and And
subtle of the great English poems. divergence at first from
notas
interpretation are might appear- leading us farther
it
closer to it"
but 100).
("Shelley Scholarship/' p
and in Too
divergence" frequently, however, the "difference interpreta- tion to student are those of a to available the names and
few major only,
as does that for critical comment on Prometheus
Bennett Weaver,
suggest,
must for articles Unbound we "follow the of the books there are few way
to written on this is overlook a fertile
drama"
(Rom&ntic Poets, p. 187), of brief smaller, but not comments always minor, studies or
body certainly
of the
changing whose impact on our understanding of the poem, and is
in- attitudes toward it, negligible only because they are in large part accessible, full of these
A treatment of the comprehensive variorum range would to to this situation. be the corrective
writings appear For, although viii i
not a in classic,
Matthew Arnold 1888 "Shelby
could argue that to no p, be ted with earnest attention" ("Shelley*" 206), various readings are for treatment was evident to the need such a
Swinburne some twenty
wrote: earlier. He years
It is the of a scholiast is <> noon wanted <** it
seldom that work
an in Shell** y*n
works error** has been. first collected edition of his had and The
many gapn patent serious reader. text is far debute mid
and to Hia palpable any ulntad) matter
as classic unearthed. tain
he were a Or comment, pawtgr?* l*gm though newly
for the to be as crucial and
famous emendation; muster singer of our subjects
leant <*f his own masters and models the modem
enviable proof poets shares with 3 diverse fame and comme.utarieH {"Note*/* p. that given by corrupt readings
most
certainly, only the would deny the detnibiltty
Today, prejudiced
be a of the that can thrown on an and fullest possible light
jmem complex* and Prormtlieus a
subtle, significant as Unbound, even though part of that be from sources dimmed time,
now somewhat
light by final should to nrlttrttoii
word A
be said with respect the requirements of condensation well
and in variorum au thorn Some editing. may object that
their work has its abbreviated,
been unhappily
general significance largely lost in is details. It that, the segregation of
my hope, however, fHjweially
in fair the broader view indication of of ha* the Introduction, a
IHWW
point**
if and much
that, been given, of the supporting evidence haw MixwHHortly sacrificed to the demands a fair limitation, fttatomont of the of space attitude be and the of acknowledged, desirability
may
for tiny
pewpi^ttve one in the total
critical be udmittm), interpretation pattern of thought
may tAWRBNCK ZItUIAtf
JOHN
University of Washington
A cknowledgments is
IT to record hero for
PLEASANT thanks my the help so cheerfully given
and so essential to this at the to
same time work; andthe completion of
all share in as
absolve such the
work concerned from any shortcomings evidence. may
the on
To have borne
the University of
many Washington campus who with Professors A. R.
and,
me, for special help, to Benham,
Charles Goggio, late the Curtis C.
D. Mrs.
Vail; to Ruth
Linden Mander, and Kirk, In-
Loanterlibrary Librarian, for diligence in locating seemingly inaccessible to Research the Committee of the Graduate School for in items;
funds and to
the Fund
Committee Agnes Anderson Research
support of research; for in aid of a grant publication,
Cali-
To San
the Bodleian Library; the Marino,,
Huntington Library,
fornia 2176 and and the
MSS HM Duke
(for HM 2177); University for to use microfilms and
Library, permission photostats of
manuscript materials in their collections.
for
To the Keats Memorial Association to
- Shelley permission
reproduce
in
now Memorial
Joseph Severn's posthumous portrait* the Keats-Shelley in
House Rome*
Allen
To Unwin
the following holders of copyrighted material; &
George
Classical Ltd. A* K. Thomson's The for J
Literature; English
Background of
for for
Edward Arnold Ltd, Oliver The Atlantic
Elton's Shelley; Monthly
Warren Beach for his The Arthur Symons'
Concept ShcUey; Joseph of
Nature
Benn Ltd, for the
in Ninetee.nth~Gertiury English Poetry; Ernest Basil Black-
Julian Edition of Shelley's Works;
Roger Ingpen-Waltar Peck
welt for and
and
the Principle of Association**
Ralph Houston's "Shelley
for Nineteenth
William R. Rutland's Swinburne, a The
Hettene;
Century
British Council for Spender's Shelley;
Stephen Calcutta University Press
for for Sen's Studies in University Press
Amiyakumar Shdky; Cambridge
Literature and for S. J. Suddard's History English
The Cambridge of Mary The Catholic World Mer- and for Sister Anna
Keats,
Sfaetttty Shakespeare;
Acknowlwlgrnents
x
arid St. Gwtto & cedes'
"Two Paths from Augutine";
Plato: Shelley for Herbert JL C.
and Oxford Press, New York, Windus, Ltd., University
Critical /'win; The
and
C. Smith's A Grierson J. History Knglisti of for The letters* for
Clarendon Press, Oxford, John Bailey's (smtinuity
of I).
A. M,
Mental Ihi^hwls Shelln
Bald's Progress, for Shelley's
Marjory
for B.
Published in "The
Poems 1820, Rajan's Motivation of Shelley^
for
Some and
for Walter Authors*
Prometheus Unbound," Raleigh's Columbia for
in Shelley; University Prrsn Archibald Strong's Three Studies for B.
Rnww Edward Qmtempomry
Hungerford's Shores of Darkness; Classical
Elizabeth Meldrum's "The
Background of Shelley,"
for Gerald Duckworth Co, Ltd.
Also to: & Stopford Brooke's Studies for 7%<* Plutonium
James Duke
A, Notopoulow' in Poetry; University Press
I. Ifatrth; Kdin-
for White's The
and Newman
Shelley Unextinguislwl of thr for P.
H. Butter's Idols C/nv;
Shelley's of University Press
burgh
Inc. for Demon
Arthur Wormhoudt's The &
Exposition Press /xwr; Kyrc for Leslie Hours in a Fa her
mid
Library: Stephens* Spottiswoode Ltd. for for hin
Faber Ltd. Leone Vivante's Englisli Poetry; K.
JL Fogle "(mage
St
Limited of
and A Prometheus Unbound"; Gambit
Imagelessness: Reading for The for
Co. Ltd. Cousin's Work Promethean; Dr. II HaltsWhitc
James W. Hale-White and Amelia
H. Kfhir;
Sterling's translation of Spinoxa*
and Barnes Inc. for
G. Co. Ltd. & Noble A. K.
KoilwayV George Harrap&
the for Lorli
Godwin and Transition; Harvard Pnwn the
Univornity
Age of
Classical for
IIitin
individual William (see editors);
Library Bibliography for Edition of
Ltd. the Bonchurch The
mann
Qmtplete Works of Al^rnon ton Mifflin for
II* *Sr/#^'W
G. GarJwV Charles Swinburne;
Company Hough
for
Poems and
Shelley
George WoodbetrryV l*tiIiri<Ige
of Percy Bysshe Edition of Poetical
Hutchin- The Complete Percy /tyssfw Shelley;
Works of
son Co. Ltd. for Graham Pw*t$; The
&
Journal
Hough's The Romantic of
Aesthetics Criticism for
and Art Charles (X "Whtteltfsitcfit
Hoffman'* (J.
Nature and Romantic for hit!
Philosophy of Poetry**; Wilson Knight 1 The Christian Renaissance and The Starlit Alfred In* for
A,
Dome; * Knopf
I. White's
Newman Green Co. ami Koiwrt
& LtdShelley;
Longmans
for executrix Robert
Bridges'
The Mac miUttti
Bridges' The. Spirit of Afrm; for Solomon in, the for
Kwnantir hutn* Company Gingerich's Essays
Alfred Science
North Whitehead's and the Modern for ami WiHtnin
JfWrf, Co. Ltd. for 01 won Ware}
Butler Yeats's Essays; Methuen &
CnmplwlPH and the
D. for C. Ix)eock^s The. tivxithe
Shelley Unromantics, PIMMS
/Vmy
of
and for
A. Glutton- Brock's I/if
Shelley, Man A** mil! Shelley the and his Introduction to the
Locock
edition; fur
MimuMotit
University of Ellsworth Barnard's
The
Shelley's Modern Religion (1937); Ixutgttaga Association of America for K, N.
Cameron's "The Political
SymtxtltMm of Prometheus Unbound" and for
Bennett
Weaver's "Pwmrthcua Bound and
Prometheus North Carolina
Unbound"; for
University of Frew Carl Graho'* Prometheus
Unbound: An
Mrs. Viola Notanello Interpretation; xi
Acknowledgments
for J. millari Macmillan Brown's The
Prometheus Unbound
Brown)
of
A
Shelley: Study,
Also to: Hodder ion Ltd., and J. P.
&
Alfred Noycs, Messrs. S tough for
Alfred Modern
No Some
Lippineott (Company yes's Aspects of Poetry;
Press for Ellsworth Barnard's
The Odyssey Shelley; Selected Poems, Essays*
Oxford forand letters; Press, New Kurtz's
University York,
Benjamin The Pursuit Death; A Oxford
Press,
of Study of Shells Poetry; University
for
IX New York, Ltd, the Sinclair
John and John Lane The Bodley Bead
translation of Dante's Divine Press,
London, Comedy; Oxford University
for
H. N. BrailsfonFs Their and for
and Circle,
Slwtt&y, Godtvin, the poets in the Oxford Standard Authors
Princeton Univer- represented series; for
Press Carlos Baker's Fabric
The
sity Shelley's Major Vision; Poetry; ofa for Paul G. P* Putnam's Sons Elmer Mora's Shelburne.
Essays, Seventh Series for his
M. Hader of Evil Mis-
(1910); Melvin "Shelley's Theory
Sir Herbert Read for his Phil- understood";
"Shelley the Optimistic Rinehart& for N.
Inc. K. Cameron's Rinehart Edition osopher"; Company of for
and Prose; & Ltd,
Shelky\*t Selected Poetry
Routledge Kegan Paul
f^ord G. Wilson and for F.
A. Lea's Knight's Byron; Christian Firtues the
and Romantic Revolution; Authors for The Col-
Shelley The Society of lected
Inc. for
Bermrd The Edmund
George Shaw;
Works of Viking Press Blunders
SfieUty. a word of thanks for and far assistance
Finally, special patience beyond
call
the either vows to her to this book is
whom
of duty or of marital dedicated.
Contents
THExvii
PLAN OF THIS EDITION
3 INTRODUCTION
EXPLANATORY NOTE 115
TEXT PROMETHEUS OFUNBOUND,
WITH AND TEXTUAL NOTES 117
302 CRITICAL NOTES APPENDIXES
A* Drafts of Prometheus Unbound 631
Shelley's Translations of Prometheus
B. Shelley*s Italian
677 Unbound
Passages Mrs.
(1 Note on Prometheus Unbound Shelley's for Her Edition of 682
Written 1839
D*
689 Contemporary Reviews The Prometheus
723
Story before Shelley
F. Basic to
A Values"
the "Representative
Approach
in Prometheus
732 Unbound
G. of the
The Time Scheme Poem 741
II* *s in the E 744
Shelley Lyric Indention
Manuscript 747 BIBLIOGRAPHY
767
INDEX
Illustrations
facing
Unbound
Portrait of Shelley writing Prometheus in the Baths of Caracalla 140
V Bodleian Folio 18 lines of I 141 MS E.l , Act
Shelley opening 172
Bodleian MS c.4, draft of
II.iii.28-42 Folio 6,
Shelley Additions
from Bodleian 3 173 Debatable MSS E.1, 2,
Shelley readings The This Edition
Plan of
IT is FUHFOSE
THE edition of to
Prometheus Unbound of the present bring 1
all
of the and textual critical, that together
important published material,
can in assist reader of the this
the Of significant
any way poem. necessity
certain of selection on editor,
I tried to
the have choose
imposes problems from that extensive to
the of writing that has accrued wisely body
poem
its first in and to correlate in
since the material such a
1820, publication that critical discernible. trends be
way emphases and may is it
The basic text and has with verbal
that of 1820,
been reproduced
It exactness* wa to decide between necessary this relatively imperfect text in
was and the
(printed England while Shelley in Italy)
manuscript
decision left the was based on
by poet* the following considerations, My
historical: The is not the one from which
(1)
mainly manuscript the play
was was revised after had madesignificantly Shelley printed, but by Mary
it, is
the itself
(2) The
printer's
copy from manuscript imperfect, especially its literal as
in and a basic text could have little punctuation, reproduction detailed in
more than The treatment
curiosity value* descriptive possible
and fuller and much more
ray textual notes variant readings permitted a best on
this, than
Shelley's 1820,
adequate presentation of commentary it. have been base text abstracted from
would had a been The
(3)
possible
full evidence for "final" text is before
the Shelley's debatable question of
an ab-
the reader without the prejudice of assumed judgment through l been for some have made only certain theses that have, in significant
Kiptkm studies. effort to read
has been mad amplified published portions of the Every way*
nil the* to in in
of references the written and those languages English, foreign poem of this material that have
(much been generally recognized a of inde{>emlent value of a
k and American Lack criticism)*
largely a reworking of English comprehensive
it is
but that no Shelley bibliography hat increased the possibility of oversight, hoped 1820 and 1955 has been missed. The work between exigencies of publi- of importance
in
cation the have have of the book, of items that prevented detailed treatment, body
all
but have come to
latter data,
appeared following the pertinent studies that my have in the
asterisk)
been included (preceded by an attention before actual press time
in footnote references.
and where Bibliography feambla,
The. xviii
Plan of This use of the straction. in 1839 made manu- relatively slight
(4) Mrs. Shelley
to scholars her it did not become available until IH93, edition; script for 1 Histori- as to a critical edition until (3)
and was not used corrective Wk 1820 corrected rvpresrntcil
slightly by Mrs. Shellry) cally, (or that edition editors. for most nineteenth-century the point of departure draft lines of text on variants the
Immediately below each page, selected
A), as we!! an de- (the drafts fully in are given are reproduced Appendix 8 to be in the and tailed found K variant readings manuscript in repre- editions Of the edition* of the sentative
many of importance. subsequent
hold serious interest for textual KdJtors have
few
study, only a
poem and the detailed variant
to rest on a editions,
tended
heavily few key
work have been limited
largely to these, anil to readings of the present as have sufficient such others interest to justify their inclusion. independent late release
But the
the history of the text, especially in of the manuscript,
and
I
editions have therefore treated thorn these unusual significance, gives
is to in
the
more than
fully customary, notably with respect punctuation characteristics verse. of
The
general other representative edition* are in the Introduction. given as throw on textual
Below
light these readings are such notes may
These include of the E
Shelley's alterations manuHcript, wdleeied problems. differences of to the
K
draft readings, opinion with respect
wading*,
be etc. Here also will found such variant** in other than the conjectures,
fall into
editions as editorial do not imitation*
key the pattern of
avoid an awkward critical
To not*
unnecessarily
page makeup, pertain-
to scenes and lines have been the ing specific interpretation of plueeit nt
end of the unless stems from textual conniibrii-
such interpretation
poem,
cross
which case a reference will direct to
tions, in the Textual Note*, Trait- of draft as well as the Italian translation scriptions passages* by Shelby, to
have been Introduction The deals with
relegated appendixes. more
and
historical, textual, critical interest general matters of
all
For
whatever nature have
relevant manuscripts, textual variants of
it been the reader to
given, making possible for reconstruct completely any of these items. For Mrs. of nht?
1839 OH
Shelley's editions wa* (inaftmuch in at least
from , all
textual variant* for
working part Shelley's errata) the
andverse the Preface have as well as cif been indicated, in
any importance
directions. Minor the stage the latter not stylistic differences in have hmt included. For the other all essential principal editions variant* have noted.
been It must is
a relative and be granted that "essential" there be term,
may
a reader of this to
book it is whom to know that one editor u*w important
single
t have
instead of double quotation marks, or spells labor, labour,
assumed that no real can be served at
purpose by minh 2 indicating length
Bodleian
MSS and E,3 E.I, E.2, have referred to
as B formerly been (for !hc!l*tnn). but recent
acquisitions make a
by the Library clearer distinction The. This
Kditwn
xix
Plan of
matters of individual of them mannerisms.
For the editorial style,
many editions other than those of Mrs. key Shelley, therefore,
the following
have been
items omitted or treated as indicated: errors. Obvious errors
have not been
Typographical typographical given in These have included or erroneous the variant readings. clearly
dropped broken to lines,
type, failure punctuation, capitalize at beginnings of failures, accidental hyphenation, spacing omission of closing quotation
and mis-
letters, marks, transposed misplaced apostrophes or accents,
In
if the error in a
the latter instance, has resulted spellings. however,
it
different has word, been included.
i/.e, and have in the
not been Type. Type style, spacing noted, except italics for case of emphasis.
Some editors have used some
Quotation marks* single quotation marks,
some at and end of
double; quotes, others quotes the beginning
running
the These differences have not been passage only. indicated, but,
queued
where marks have for in
markedquotation been supplied passages not so 1820, this fact has been noted*
move- have been admitted when the
Spelling, only (1) Spelling variants of the line the case of a
ment has been when
altered (as in dieresis), (2) in assonance in altered
(as in chant,
change pronunciation has resulted
to
(3) when some has attached the variant*
chaunt)) or special interest will
The variations be indicated
spelling principal types of the following
by list:
aereal; aerial, aggrandisement, aggrandizement; amphisbenic, amphis-
is
latter as
one
hasnie; aye., bleat, clearly ay; blessed (where the pronounced burthen, burden; cameleon, syllable); chameleon, camelion; candour, can- dor; cloak, eloke; desert, desart; frenzying, development, developement; learnt, gulph, gulf; immoveably, immovably; phrerizying; gray* grey;
t
learned; 'mid, Oh; oer,
mid; might's mightst; 0, o*er; past, passed; rapt,
vail
veil,
siren, tho, the'; rapped; skiey, skyey; syren; though, in later
Preface have editions some- Tides, Titles referred to in Shelley's in times in sometimes marks* These differ-
italics,
quotation been given ences have not been noted
and
Punctuation* In a work phrasing are of poetry* matters of rhythm in of
Because this, by ahadings punctuation.
strongly or subtly influenced in
and because of the influence of W. Rossetti and the E
M.
manuscriptfor errors) punctuation variants (except this respect, obvious typographical verse. in editions have the For the Preface the fully for
key been given and directions have
they changed the stage been given only w}ien meaning be
one mark
results* In certain instances^ clearly, of punctuation may to
it seemed desirable furnish
has considered the equivalent of another, but to his the reader can determine satis- the exact evidence own
by which
in emphasis. faction the presence or absence of shadings to
Inasmuch used
are frequently suggest personifi- Capitals. as capitals have been admitted. cation, for etc,, these variants it ion
til
The
7Hv xx
Plan of
is and
If the line clear, accents. movement
and apostrophes
Apostrophes
have not hwn
to or accents indicate syllables
pronounced nonpronounced is been
debatable If the movement
IV.367), the accent has (as at given. included. has use of has been indicated, as
compound Hyphens, Hyphenation
result in
inasmuch as words, both frequently modified emphasis.
to the
do
It above not apply exceptions should be repeated that the former have to Mrs. of 1839. The been or
Shelley's editions
manuscripts and the Preface. and the latter in detail for the verse
in detail,
compared
to admission or has been
With the critical material,
rejection respect will to which a better understanding of the poem
determined by the degree
at refer to result. It is a rare work on some point
Shelley that does not
is a contribution to
too seldom there
Prometheus Unbound, but positive
can he found in
Mere course,
or censure, of our understanding. praise any
and of the rhetorical efforts to
in some extreme, and, while period any
and are offer outdo
delightful to read, they predecessors blaze brightly in
un
little the of and would amount
illumination, justifiable
way require an
were more included* An
than a representative exception of space sampling in the inclusion of the reviews of has
been made, however, contemporary
the first hold a and edition, which insofar special interest are given fully, as in
on Prometheus D
they bear Unbound,
Appendix
in critical In the Introduction the trends have
Imm
principal thinking as for detailed consideration?! serve an orientation the more found traced, to in the Critical Notes. in
More have bean treated the
general subjects
fuimmarizwi
appendixes. Insofar as practicable, however, opinion has boon in Critical at it the where will be most
Notes, the point pertinently useful
It is to the reader.
inevitable that
ida
over a period of time the
1
of imitation* will recur, either independently or through the flattery tried in these to
have instances credit to the first
to occurrence, or give the first full idea, reasonably development, of the
Where critical has to a
reference been made possible source or analogue, without quotation of the been or, parallel material, quotation has supplied has
where this been All summarized* from
impracticable, quotation* classical or writers
have been
standardized
major modern aubtitutbii f by where necessary, of a single edition.
It
is that the wider and more immediate of the hoped usefulness
decision to
work the all
in will justify give foreign4anguage items
but
I limitations tion,
have
regret that space prevented the
supplementary
inclusion of the rather original texts for this of material large body
Shelley's Prometheus
Unbound A
VARIORUM EDITION
Introduction
AIM OF this Introduction is
THE twofold; to of
(1)outline the present
body
text of Prometheus and the of
Unbound nature knowledge concerning the
the of the to the
(2) broader outlines of
principal editions poem; survey critical to of the opinion with respect the quality and meaning poem. De- tailed text notes on and will elsewhere in book.
be found the
interpretation
TEXTUAL CONSIDERATIONS
GENESIS OF THE TEXTinterest in the Promethean will in
Shelley's be considered early story the second division of this Introduction, interest at this
Our major
point centers on under date of
by [5] -14,
a journal entry Mrs. Shelley September "
1818: Drama and on a letter
"Mo writes his
of 'Prometheus,' of Sep- to
tember from which he
22, 1818, Shelley, in Padua, at Este, in
Mary,
her to will
asked
bring "the sheets of 'Prometheus Unbound,' which you find to
numbered from one on , is first l twenty-six the table of the pavilion"
This the evidence we have had (Julian,
IX, 332) that the poet
*In all than that as or notes in the
(other found
the present million prose prefaces
thorn Marian of the Poetical text
Oxford Standard Au
IForh) follows the of the Ingpen- data of this letter in as
IVck Julian Edition of Jforks (the 22,
Shulloy's given
?Septembcr but it to be in fact of that Short titles fre-
Mr. shown date). have
Shdky'B journal
in critical full identifica- bem references, for which
quently employed or biographical can
tion be consulting the Bibliography. cam'ly made by in
Mrs. her note on Julian and Maddalo on the Poems of 1818
Shelley, in (note site
was a villa built on the of a Julian 21^1), wrote: "I [at Kate]
[III, Cappuoeini it
when the was convent, dotnoliHhed religious houses;
French suppressed Capuchin
hill the
brow of a low at foot of Hitunted cm a range of higher ones. tha very overhanging
as called
The house vine-trellised it is in was cheerful and walk* a pergola, pleasant; a
to a at end of the
led from the halkbor summer -house the which
Italian,
garden,
made his and in which he tha Prometheus"
Shelley study, began Un-
to, to,
Other or probably the composition of Prometheus pertinent references
as follows: writes'*
bound in and letters are
Mr. Shelley's "Shelley m given journal
1818 Reel ; ; "Write
15, f 10] [22] -24) out Shelley's
MSS, September (September Abmger
4
Inlnxluctiwi
begun the actual composition of the poem, and the sheets probably a
are not extant. draft,
is indicated That he wrote the dated
steadily letter, next pertinent
by October to Love Peacock: "I
Este, 8, Thomas have ben 1818, writing
and
indeed have first of a classical the act and just finished drama, lyrical
" to be called Unbound'
'Prometheus But on
(IX, 24, 1810, 336).
January from to act Peacock that the first wan
Naples, Shelley could only repeat finished: I little "At write else and little of that. present but poetry,
is
1st act of
I likts Prometheus and think it"
complete,
My you would
failure to 21). The as as at first to
(X, can be asoritwd progress rapidly distress the
24, following the death of Clara Shelley 1818,
on September and the to and
Rome subsequent journey
Naples, with aigh
many tawing excursions to time.
the
The however, was
delay,
occupy
only temporary, f for to
6,
by April 1819, the poet could write Peacock from Rome:
- My
Prometheus Unbound is and in a
I month or two shall
just finished, wnd
2
it" (X, 4&). the
That drama was not sent as as is
intended evident
from promptly
another letter to
Peacock from Livorno
1819; 1
"As to Oilier,
in July, don't know has or
what what at
been published, has arrived hw hatuk
I
do till
I
not send know ,
My Prometheus though ready,
more** (X, 63)
But other considerations have
contributed to the William
may delay. on June and
7, was affected
Shelley died the logs of the poet deeply hw
by child. know
we that Prometfwus
Indeed, although Unbound was "finfohwd** to
6, Hunt from Livorno as late at*
by April Shelley wrote
15: Leigh
Augtmt
and
"Though surrounded by sufferingalmimt disquietude, and, latterly,
overcome
I
have not been idle. by our strange misfortune ProraetlieiiHMy is 68).
finished" (X,
Poem"
"Finish copying (December 19); "I painting
- (December 18); his Poem*'
is so
that the
Sfhelley] arte take all
writing a our tiimT <i poem Me up
(to Hunt, April
"Read "
1819); Shelley's Drama"
(April
25); Shelley'a Tromethniw' "Copy
" 9xpt*!tnl*r
1 5 ad R Trome theus
Unbound"* 1820 (October , (the publiNhecl 17, ?] ptmm|); iwr" l the Goodness to at order
Would you have your Stationers a doom bcmkn likr
plain
that the Prometheus was
(to Maria
copied in" March UCJO Gisborne, February or
MSS, Reel [Abinger 6]).
"finished" would, at
this time, to the first throe
apply only Ant* Iniwiiiiirh
Actually,
as
Act had M
IV
not yet been Edward
projected, that Hi*
Hungerford'a suggestion Shf v must have been the names of punning on Prometheus and hi brother
Kplmethcu"
m
Act
IV as
referring to
an "afterthought in (Shorn of Darkn***, p, 192) attnuttivr,
1
but fcna no evidence that Shelley used the word.
^Charles and James Oilier were
Shelley's publishers. !> wroti*
Apparently Shelley
of the to poem latter
Leigh Hunt, or the learned of for
it, he wrote to in this
Shelfey same month:
I long, to see Prometheus hnnidf.
I
by-the-by,
v<ui
have no doubt
his
have handled wearied virtue'
It is
but
I
nobly. curious, had
Hub white
thought
entitled
ago of writing a myself,
poem
Prometheus Throw*!; m which
I
bttombfi to nave described as him
- * having lately taken possession of
Jupiter's seat. But thu mlmn
on
is in better every account hands. I am
rather the son of one of
Atl'
than of Atlas himself' (Correspondence, 1,
Introduction
5 thereafter,
Shortly
and James
6, the poet wrote Charles f on September Oilier:
is Prometheus/ which finished, now '"My
being has been long
and . . .
will soon be to for transcribed, forwarded The f 1 you publication.
will Prometheus be so you usual" (X, 79). good as to print, as Ap-
to of
John
parently Shelley intended forward the manuscript, by way to where it to be held for
Gisborne, was England, Peacock,
on Septem- by
"I latter: have sent
Trometheus,'
ber 21 the poet wrote the you
my
I which do not wish to be sent Oilier for until I to
to write publication that effect. Giaborne it"
Mr. will
83). And bring (X,
on September 27
U
I
he Hunt; have sent to Peacock
'Prometheus Unbound'wrote Leigh
my
if ask for it him he will it show you (X, 87). you"Giflhorne's were arid he did to
But John not
changed, go plans England until the Gisbornes nevertheless interested