DEVELOPMENT OF MASTER MODEL MACHINE FOR SPIN CASTING TECNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT OF MASTER MODEL MACHINE FOR SPIN CASTING TECNOLOGY.
DEVELOPMENT OF MASTER MODEL MACHINE FOR SPIN
CASTING TECNOLOGY
THESIS
This is Submitted to Fulfill Prerequirement of
Industrial Engineer of International S-1 Program
Written by:
Agustinus Mahar Wicaksono
04 14 04299
INTERNATIONAL INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING PROGRAM
INDUSTRIAL TECHNOLOGY FACULTY
ATMA JAYA YOGYAKARTA UNIVERSITY
YOGYAKARTA
2010
i
ii
iii
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
This Thesis is dedicated for
Mom, Dad and My Sisters
And also for My Girl
iv
FOREWORD
This final report is one of the prerequisite to
finish the undergraduate study program in Industrial
Engineering Department, Industrial Technology Faculty,
Atmajaya Yogyakarta University.
I am so grateful to many people who encouraged,
and
help
me
to
finish
this
final
report.
On
this
opportunity, I would like to thank:
1.
Jesus Christ, for His blessing and guidance.
2.
Mr. Ir. B. Kristianto, M.Eng., Ph.D, as the Dean of
Industrial Technology Faculty, Atmajaya Yogyakarta
University.
3.
Mr.
The
Jin
Industrial
Ai,
D.Eng.,
Engineering
Ph.D,
as
the
Department,
Head
of
Industrial
Technology Faculty, Atmajaya Yogyakarta University.
4.
Mrs. Ririn Diar Astanti, D. Eng, as the Coordinator
International Class of Industrial Engineering.
5.
Mr. Theodorus B. Hanandoko, S.T., M.T., as first
adviser,
who
guidance,
had
spent
direction,
plenty
inputs
of
and
time
to
correction
give
in
writing this final report.
6.
Mr. Paulus Wisnu Anggoro, S.T., M.T., thanks for
all those advice, inputs and support in writing
this final report.
7.
Mr.
Ashari
and
his
crews
at
Hari
Mukti
Teknik
Workshop, thank you the input, the idea of machine
construction, and warm welcome.
8.
Friends,
quality
Dahana,
Eko,
brainstorming
William,
Pieter,
for
our
session.
Thanks
for
the
input, support and pickup rent.
v
9.
My lovely Bebeb. Thanks for your patience. Your
phone calls cheers me up during the completion of
my thesis. Warm kiss. I love you.
10. My friends TIKI Batch 2004, finally, we’re in the
same level. Thank you.
11. My lovely Family, Dad and my sisters, especially
for minister of financial my mom, thanks for your
approval in funding my thesis, love you mom.
12. Uncle hadi, uncle Budi, Mas eko and families at
Fajar Indah Solo for nice advice, support and warm
welcome during the research of silicon rubber.
13. All those who haven’t mentioned, thank you.
I realize that this final report has not perfect
but I hope that this final report can be useful and can
be developed in a further research.
Yogyakarta, August 2010
vi
CONTENTS
COVER …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
i
STATEMENT OF WORK’S ORIGINALITY ……………………………………………
ii
AUTHORIZATION ……………………………………………………………………………………………
iii
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT ………………………………………………………………………………………
iv
FOREWORD …………………………………………………………………………………………………………
v
CONTENTS …………………………………………………………………………………………………………
vii
TABLE CONTENTS …………………………………………………………………………………………
x
FIGURE CONTENTS ………………………………………………………………………………………
xii
APPENDIX CONTENT ……………………………………………………………………………………
xvi
ABSTRACT …………………………………………………………………………………………………………
xvii
CHAPTER 1 BACKGROUND
1.1. Background ……………………………………………………………………………………………
1
1.2. Problem Statement …………………………………………………………………………
3
1.3. Research Objectives ……………………………………………………………………
3
1.4. Scope of Research …………………………………………………………………………
4
1.5. Research Methodology …………………………………………………………………
5
1.6. Report Outline …………………………………………………………………………………
6
CHAPTER 2 LITERATURE REVIEW ……………………………………………………………
7
CHAPTER 3 BASIC THEORY
3.1. Spin Casting ……………………………………………………………………………………
10
3.2. Casting Defects ……………………………………………………………………………
15
3.3. Silicone Rubber ……………………………………………………………………………
15
3.4. Tin ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………
19
3.5. Analysis Tools ………………………………………………………………………………
20
3.5.1. Function Analysis …………………………………………………………………
21
3.5.2. Functional Decomposition Diagram (FDD)……………
21
vii
3.5.3. Design Failure Mode Effect Analysis (DFMEA)
26
3.5.4. Grid Analysis ……………………………………………………………………………
34
3.5.5. Tree Diagram ………………………………………………………………………………
36
3.5.6. The Cause and Effect Diagram (Fishbone Diagram)
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
39
3.5.7. Arrow Diagram ……………………………………………………………………………
41
3.6. Mechanical Design Procedure ……………………………………………
43
3.6.1. Shaft Design Procedure …………………………………………………
43
3.6.2. Taper Key Design Procedure …………………………………………
51
3.6.3. Axial Bearing Design Procedure ………………………………
55
3.9. Production Cost ………………………………………………………………………………
57
CHAPTER 4 COMPANY PROFILE AND DATA
4.1. Current Spin Casting Machine Component
Data …………………………………………………………………………………………………………
69
4.2. Experiment Material Cost………………………………………………………
76
4.3. Data of Machine component cost ……………………………………
60
CHAPTER 5 ANALYSIS AND DISCUSSION
5.1. Analysis
5.1.1 . Analysis using Function Analysis ………………………
61
5.1.2. Analysis using Functional Decomposition
Diagram ……………………………………………………………………………………………
62
5.1.3. Analysis using FMEA ………………………………………………………
64
5.2. Redesign Process …………………………………………………………………………
70
5.2.1. Substitute Material for Hinge
(Part A1-3) and (part A1-4) ………………………………………
70
5.2.2. Substitute Material for Upper Inlet
(Part B1-1)……………………………………………………………………………………
72
5.2.3. Substitute Material for Handle (PartA1-2)…
74
5.2.4. Redesign Construction for Shaft (Part B2-4)…… 97
viii
5.2.5. Substitute Bolt M7 to Taper Key as Shaft Stopper
Key ………………………………………………………………………………………………………
99
5.2.6. Redesigned Head Casting …………………………………………………… 104
5.2.7. Substitute The Selected Guide Member (Part B2-3)
and Sealing Member (Part B2-6)…………………………………… 105
5.2.8. Adjustment
Design
for
pulley
(Part
B2-5)
and
Belt (Part B2-5-1)……………………………………………………………………… 95
5.3. Result of Redesign Process …………………………………………………… 96
5.4. The Experimental Analysis of Adaro Business Card
Holder The New Master Model Machine …………………………
5.4.1. Analysis
of
The
Result
on
Experiment
99
Adaro
Business Card Holder Using The New Master Model
Machine ……………………………………………………………………………………………
100
5.4.2. Analysis Production Cost of Adaro Business Card
Holder ………………………………………………………………………………………………… 113
5.4.3. Analysis of Master
Model Machine Cost …………
117
5.6.4. Analysis of Production Cost of Adaro Business
Card Holder ………………………………………………………………………………
5.2. Discussion …………………………………………………………………………………………
118
115
CHAPTER 6 MANUAL INSRTUCTION
6.1. Component Unit of Spin Casting Machine ………………… 119
6.2. The List of Specification of Spin Casting
Machine …………………………………………………………………………………………………… 122
6.3. The Operating Procedure of Spin Casting
Machine …………………………………………………………………………………………………
122
CHAPTER 7 CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTION
7.1. Conclusion …………………………………………………………………………………………
135
7.2. Suggestion …………………………………………………………………………………………
137
ix
TABLE CONTENTS
Table 2.1. Comparison Previous and Present Research
10
Table 3.1. Properties of Some Silicone Rubber …………
19
Table 3.2. The Functional Decomposition Elements …
23
Table 3.3. DFMEA Form Table …………………………………………………………
27
Table 3.4. Severity Rating ……………………………………………………………
29
Table 3.5. Occurrence Rating ………………………………………………………
31
Table 3.6. Detection Rating …………………………………………………………
32
Table 3.7. Grid Analysis Table Before Weighted ………
36
Table 3.8. Grid Analysis Table After Weighted …………
36
Table 3.9. Correction Factor of Power Transmitted…
46
Table 3.10. The Size of Taper Key ……………………………………………
52
Table 3.11. The Allowed Pressure on Axial Bearing …
55
Table 4.1. Current Master Model Machine
Specifications ………………………………………………………………
59
Table 4.2. Experiment Material Cost ……………………………………
59
Table 4.3. Data of Component cost …………………………………………
60
Table 5.1. Classification of Critical Functions
Parts ………………………………………………………………………………………
64
Table 5.2. FMEA Form ……………………………………………………………………………
66
Table 5.3. The Result of redesign Process ………………………… 97
Table 5.4. Usage of HTV Silicon Rubber in Vulcanizer at
First Trial ……………………………………………………………………
100
Table 5.5. Usage of HTV Silicon rubber in Vulcanizer at
Second Trial …………………………………………………………………
108
Table 5.6. Usage of HTV Silicon rubber in Vulcanizer at
Third Trial ……………………………………………………………………
111
Table 5.7. Production Time Using Master Model Machine
………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 113
Table 5.8. Master Model Machine Cost ………………………………
x
114
Table 5.9. Vulcanizer Machine Cost ……………………………………
114
Table 6.1. New Master Model Specification …………………
120
Table 7.1. The Specification of Master Model
Machine ……………………………………………………………………………
131
Table 7.2. Comparison Result ……………………………………………………
132
xi
FIGURE CONTENTS
Figure 1.1. Flowchart of Research Methodology …………
5
Figure 3.1. Arrange Part on the Mold …………………………………
10
Figure 3.2. Arrange Locknut and Sprayed …………………………
11
Figure 3.3. Vulcanization ………………………………………………………………
11
Figure 3.4. Gating and Venting …………………………………………………
12
Figure 3.5. Spinning ……………………………………………………………………………
13
Figure 3.6. Pouring ………………………………………………………………………………
13
Figure 3.7. Pouring Illustration ……………………………………………
14
Figure 3.8. Removal Parts ………………………………………………………………
14
Figure 3.9. Silicone Rubber Chain …………………………………………
16
Figure 3.10. Example of Tree Diagram …………………………………
39
Figure 3.11. Illustration of Fishbone Diagram …………
40
Figure 3.12. Example of Arrow Diagram ………………………………
42
Figure 3.13. Flow Diagram for Shaft with Torsion and
Bending Force Design Procedure
……………………………………………………………………………………………………
45
Figure 3.14. α Stress Concentration Factor of Taper
Key ………………………………………………………………………………………
49
Figure 3.15. Shear Stress on Taper Key ……………………………
52
Figure 3.16. Flow Diagram for Taper Key Design
Procedure ………………………………………………………………………
54
Figure 3.17. Flow Diagram for Axial Bearing Design
Procedure …………………………………………………………………………
56
Figure 4.1. Current Master Model Machine ………………………
58
Figure 5.1. Black Box System of Master Model Machine 61
Figure 5.2. Function Analysis of Master Model Machine
………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 61
xii
Figure 5.3. The Functional Decomposition Diagram for
The Current Spin Casting Machine ………………… 63
Figure 5.4. Hinge Substitute Material Selecting
Process ………………………………………………………………………………
71
Figure 5.5. Mild Steel of Hinge on Top Enclosure………
72
Figure 5.6. Upper Inlet Substitute Material Selecting
Process
………………………………………………………………………………
73
Figure 5.7. Handle Substitute Material Selecting
Process …………………………………………………………………………………
75
Figure 5.8. Mild Steel on Top Enclosure ……………………………
76
Figure 5.9. Forces on Shaft ……………………………………………………………
78
Figure 5.10. Forces of Belt Tension ……………………………………
79
Figure 5.11. Forces of Belt Tension Toward Z and X…
80
Figure 5.12. Reaction Forces Toward Z and X …………………
80
Figure 5.13. Reaction Forces Toward X and Y ………………
81
Figure 5.14. Bending Moment Diagram ……………………………………
82
Figure 5.15. The Modified Mold Frame Design of
Vulcanizer for Head Casting……………………………
88
Figure 5.16. Tree Diagram-The Best Design for Head
Casting …………………………………………………………………………………
Figure 5.17. Modified Mold Frame-Provide Balance……
89
90
Figure 5.18. Modified Mold Frame-Minimum Silicon Rubber
Usage ………………………………………………………………………………………
91
Figure 5.19. Counter-Grip Position …………………………………………
92
Figure 5.20. Illustration of Complete Head casting … 92
Figure 5.21. UCF four Flanged Bearing …………………………………
94
Figure 5.22. The Adaro Business Card Holder Product
Master ……………………………………………………………………………………
99
Figure 5.23. Figure of Tin Use …………………………………………………
100
Figure 5.24. Shrinkage after Vulcanizing Process……
101
xiii
Figure 5.25. Result Of Spin Casting Process on First
Trial …………………………………………………………………………………
102
Figure 5.26. Fishbone Diagram for Penetration Defect
…………………………………………………………………………………………………… 103
Figure 5.27. Tree Diagram for the Best Mold Frame
Design Related on Shrinkage at the Rubber
Mold ……………………………………………………………………………………
104
Figure 5.28. Dimesion Gap because of Shrinkage on
silicon Rubber Mold ……………………………………………
105
Figure 5.29. Result of Spin Casting Process at 34mm
Height ………………………………………………………………………………
106
Figure 5.30. Figure of Tin Selection …………………………………
106
Figure 5.31. Result of Spin Casting Process Using 50%
Tin in First Trial ………………………………………………… 107
Figure 5.32. Overview after Vulcanizing on Second Trial
…………………………………………………………………………………………………
109
Figure 5.33. Result of Spin Casting Process on Second
Trial …………………………………………………………………………………… 109
Figure 5.34. Fishbone Diagram for Penetration Defect
………………………………………………………………………………………………… 110
Figure 5.35. The New Dimension of New Mold Frame …
111
Figure 5.36. Result of Spin Casting Process Using 50%
Tin at Third Trial ………………………………………………… 112
Figure 5.37. Arrow Diagram of Casting Process …………… 113
Figure 6.1. New Master Model Machine …………………………………… 121
Figure 6.2. Thermocouple Setting ……………………………………………
121
Figure 6.3. MCB Turning On ……………………………………………………………
121
Figure 6.4. Cutting HTV Silicon Rubber ……………………………
121
Figure 6.5. Scaling Rubber ……………………………………………………………
122
Figure 6.6. Lubrication at the Mold Frame ……………………
122
xiv
Figure 6.7. Set Silicon Rubber With Master Product,
Sprue and Locknuts …………………………………………………
123
Figure 6.8. Lubrication at Silicon Rubber ……………………
123
Figure 6.9. Install the Upper Mold Frame ………………………
124
Figure 6.10. Turning Handle
………………………………………………………
124
Figure 6.11. Inserting the Mold Frame ………………………………
124
Figure 6.12. Pressing the Mold Frame …………………………………
125
Figure 6.13. MCB Turning Off ………………………………………………………
125
Figure 6.14. Pulling Out the Mold Frame …………………………
125
Figure 6.15. Open the Mold Frame ……………………………………………
126
Figure 6.16. Open Top Enclosure ………………………………………………
127
Figure 6.17. Load Silicon Rubber………………………………………………
127
Figure 6.18. Fasten the Mold Frame ………………………………………
127
Figure 6.19. Close Top Enclosure ……………………………………………
128
Figure 6.20. Connect Electrical Plug to the jack …
128
Figure 6.21. Turn the Switch On
……………………………………………
128
Figure 6.22. Pour the Molten Metal…………………………………………
129
Figure 6.23. Turn the Switch off ……………………………………………
129
Figure 6.24. Open Top Enclosure ………………………………………………
129
Figure 6.25. Remove Mold Frame …………………………………………………
130
Figure 6.26. Open Silicon Rubber Mold ………………………………
130
xv
APPENDIX CONTENTS
Appendix 1. Engineering Drawing
xvi
ABSTRACT
A master model is required before a product is
actually processed in a machine. A present research
build a prototype of master model machine in spin
casting technology which is not reliable for production
process.
The present master model machine was evaluated and
redesigned focused on the need of larger mold frame and
eliminate prop usage to enhance the reliability of
producing good quality of master product souvenirs made
from tin. The evaluation was started by constructing
Functional Decomposition Diagram. Later, the decomposed
part list was classified to its critical function based
on Function Analysis. Failure Modes Effects Analysis
(FMEA) was performed to evaluate failures of current
machine. Those failures were become input for redesign
process. Mechanical Design Procedure, Grid Analysis, and
Tree Diagram were performed during redesign process.
Some defects were found during experimental works of
Adaro business card holder using the new master model
machine. The Cause and Effect Diagram was performed to
find best solution to solve related problems.
By the end of the research, master model machine
with dimension 530mm x 440mm x 710mm; operating speed at
460 rpm; maximum silicone rubber dimension 204mm x 178mm
x 36mm ; electricity power 373 W and Adaro business card
holder product were obtained. The production time is 11,
15 minutes and the production cost per unit is IDR
10,500.00.
xvii
CASTING TECNOLOGY
THESIS
This is Submitted to Fulfill Prerequirement of
Industrial Engineer of International S-1 Program
Written by:
Agustinus Mahar Wicaksono
04 14 04299
INTERNATIONAL INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING PROGRAM
INDUSTRIAL TECHNOLOGY FACULTY
ATMA JAYA YOGYAKARTA UNIVERSITY
YOGYAKARTA
2010
i
ii
iii
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
This Thesis is dedicated for
Mom, Dad and My Sisters
And also for My Girl
iv
FOREWORD
This final report is one of the prerequisite to
finish the undergraduate study program in Industrial
Engineering Department, Industrial Technology Faculty,
Atmajaya Yogyakarta University.
I am so grateful to many people who encouraged,
and
help
me
to
finish
this
final
report.
On
this
opportunity, I would like to thank:
1.
Jesus Christ, for His blessing and guidance.
2.
Mr. Ir. B. Kristianto, M.Eng., Ph.D, as the Dean of
Industrial Technology Faculty, Atmajaya Yogyakarta
University.
3.
Mr.
The
Jin
Industrial
Ai,
D.Eng.,
Engineering
Ph.D,
as
the
Department,
Head
of
Industrial
Technology Faculty, Atmajaya Yogyakarta University.
4.
Mrs. Ririn Diar Astanti, D. Eng, as the Coordinator
International Class of Industrial Engineering.
5.
Mr. Theodorus B. Hanandoko, S.T., M.T., as first
adviser,
who
guidance,
had
spent
direction,
plenty
inputs
of
and
time
to
correction
give
in
writing this final report.
6.
Mr. Paulus Wisnu Anggoro, S.T., M.T., thanks for
all those advice, inputs and support in writing
this final report.
7.
Mr.
Ashari
and
his
crews
at
Hari
Mukti
Teknik
Workshop, thank you the input, the idea of machine
construction, and warm welcome.
8.
Friends,
quality
Dahana,
Eko,
brainstorming
William,
Pieter,
for
our
session.
Thanks
for
the
input, support and pickup rent.
v
9.
My lovely Bebeb. Thanks for your patience. Your
phone calls cheers me up during the completion of
my thesis. Warm kiss. I love you.
10. My friends TIKI Batch 2004, finally, we’re in the
same level. Thank you.
11. My lovely Family, Dad and my sisters, especially
for minister of financial my mom, thanks for your
approval in funding my thesis, love you mom.
12. Uncle hadi, uncle Budi, Mas eko and families at
Fajar Indah Solo for nice advice, support and warm
welcome during the research of silicon rubber.
13. All those who haven’t mentioned, thank you.
I realize that this final report has not perfect
but I hope that this final report can be useful and can
be developed in a further research.
Yogyakarta, August 2010
vi
CONTENTS
COVER …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
i
STATEMENT OF WORK’S ORIGINALITY ……………………………………………
ii
AUTHORIZATION ……………………………………………………………………………………………
iii
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT ………………………………………………………………………………………
iv
FOREWORD …………………………………………………………………………………………………………
v
CONTENTS …………………………………………………………………………………………………………
vii
TABLE CONTENTS …………………………………………………………………………………………
x
FIGURE CONTENTS ………………………………………………………………………………………
xii
APPENDIX CONTENT ……………………………………………………………………………………
xvi
ABSTRACT …………………………………………………………………………………………………………
xvii
CHAPTER 1 BACKGROUND
1.1. Background ……………………………………………………………………………………………
1
1.2. Problem Statement …………………………………………………………………………
3
1.3. Research Objectives ……………………………………………………………………
3
1.4. Scope of Research …………………………………………………………………………
4
1.5. Research Methodology …………………………………………………………………
5
1.6. Report Outline …………………………………………………………………………………
6
CHAPTER 2 LITERATURE REVIEW ……………………………………………………………
7
CHAPTER 3 BASIC THEORY
3.1. Spin Casting ……………………………………………………………………………………
10
3.2. Casting Defects ……………………………………………………………………………
15
3.3. Silicone Rubber ……………………………………………………………………………
15
3.4. Tin ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………
19
3.5. Analysis Tools ………………………………………………………………………………
20
3.5.1. Function Analysis …………………………………………………………………
21
3.5.2. Functional Decomposition Diagram (FDD)……………
21
vii
3.5.3. Design Failure Mode Effect Analysis (DFMEA)
26
3.5.4. Grid Analysis ……………………………………………………………………………
34
3.5.5. Tree Diagram ………………………………………………………………………………
36
3.5.6. The Cause and Effect Diagram (Fishbone Diagram)
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
39
3.5.7. Arrow Diagram ……………………………………………………………………………
41
3.6. Mechanical Design Procedure ……………………………………………
43
3.6.1. Shaft Design Procedure …………………………………………………
43
3.6.2. Taper Key Design Procedure …………………………………………
51
3.6.3. Axial Bearing Design Procedure ………………………………
55
3.9. Production Cost ………………………………………………………………………………
57
CHAPTER 4 COMPANY PROFILE AND DATA
4.1. Current Spin Casting Machine Component
Data …………………………………………………………………………………………………………
69
4.2. Experiment Material Cost………………………………………………………
76
4.3. Data of Machine component cost ……………………………………
60
CHAPTER 5 ANALYSIS AND DISCUSSION
5.1. Analysis
5.1.1 . Analysis using Function Analysis ………………………
61
5.1.2. Analysis using Functional Decomposition
Diagram ……………………………………………………………………………………………
62
5.1.3. Analysis using FMEA ………………………………………………………
64
5.2. Redesign Process …………………………………………………………………………
70
5.2.1. Substitute Material for Hinge
(Part A1-3) and (part A1-4) ………………………………………
70
5.2.2. Substitute Material for Upper Inlet
(Part B1-1)……………………………………………………………………………………
72
5.2.3. Substitute Material for Handle (PartA1-2)…
74
5.2.4. Redesign Construction for Shaft (Part B2-4)…… 97
viii
5.2.5. Substitute Bolt M7 to Taper Key as Shaft Stopper
Key ………………………………………………………………………………………………………
99
5.2.6. Redesigned Head Casting …………………………………………………… 104
5.2.7. Substitute The Selected Guide Member (Part B2-3)
and Sealing Member (Part B2-6)…………………………………… 105
5.2.8. Adjustment
Design
for
pulley
(Part
B2-5)
and
Belt (Part B2-5-1)……………………………………………………………………… 95
5.3. Result of Redesign Process …………………………………………………… 96
5.4. The Experimental Analysis of Adaro Business Card
Holder The New Master Model Machine …………………………
5.4.1. Analysis
of
The
Result
on
Experiment
99
Adaro
Business Card Holder Using The New Master Model
Machine ……………………………………………………………………………………………
100
5.4.2. Analysis Production Cost of Adaro Business Card
Holder ………………………………………………………………………………………………… 113
5.4.3. Analysis of Master
Model Machine Cost …………
117
5.6.4. Analysis of Production Cost of Adaro Business
Card Holder ………………………………………………………………………………
5.2. Discussion …………………………………………………………………………………………
118
115
CHAPTER 6 MANUAL INSRTUCTION
6.1. Component Unit of Spin Casting Machine ………………… 119
6.2. The List of Specification of Spin Casting
Machine …………………………………………………………………………………………………… 122
6.3. The Operating Procedure of Spin Casting
Machine …………………………………………………………………………………………………
122
CHAPTER 7 CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTION
7.1. Conclusion …………………………………………………………………………………………
135
7.2. Suggestion …………………………………………………………………………………………
137
ix
TABLE CONTENTS
Table 2.1. Comparison Previous and Present Research
10
Table 3.1. Properties of Some Silicone Rubber …………
19
Table 3.2. The Functional Decomposition Elements …
23
Table 3.3. DFMEA Form Table …………………………………………………………
27
Table 3.4. Severity Rating ……………………………………………………………
29
Table 3.5. Occurrence Rating ………………………………………………………
31
Table 3.6. Detection Rating …………………………………………………………
32
Table 3.7. Grid Analysis Table Before Weighted ………
36
Table 3.8. Grid Analysis Table After Weighted …………
36
Table 3.9. Correction Factor of Power Transmitted…
46
Table 3.10. The Size of Taper Key ……………………………………………
52
Table 3.11. The Allowed Pressure on Axial Bearing …
55
Table 4.1. Current Master Model Machine
Specifications ………………………………………………………………
59
Table 4.2. Experiment Material Cost ……………………………………
59
Table 4.3. Data of Component cost …………………………………………
60
Table 5.1. Classification of Critical Functions
Parts ………………………………………………………………………………………
64
Table 5.2. FMEA Form ……………………………………………………………………………
66
Table 5.3. The Result of redesign Process ………………………… 97
Table 5.4. Usage of HTV Silicon Rubber in Vulcanizer at
First Trial ……………………………………………………………………
100
Table 5.5. Usage of HTV Silicon rubber in Vulcanizer at
Second Trial …………………………………………………………………
108
Table 5.6. Usage of HTV Silicon rubber in Vulcanizer at
Third Trial ……………………………………………………………………
111
Table 5.7. Production Time Using Master Model Machine
………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 113
Table 5.8. Master Model Machine Cost ………………………………
x
114
Table 5.9. Vulcanizer Machine Cost ……………………………………
114
Table 6.1. New Master Model Specification …………………
120
Table 7.1. The Specification of Master Model
Machine ……………………………………………………………………………
131
Table 7.2. Comparison Result ……………………………………………………
132
xi
FIGURE CONTENTS
Figure 1.1. Flowchart of Research Methodology …………
5
Figure 3.1. Arrange Part on the Mold …………………………………
10
Figure 3.2. Arrange Locknut and Sprayed …………………………
11
Figure 3.3. Vulcanization ………………………………………………………………
11
Figure 3.4. Gating and Venting …………………………………………………
12
Figure 3.5. Spinning ……………………………………………………………………………
13
Figure 3.6. Pouring ………………………………………………………………………………
13
Figure 3.7. Pouring Illustration ……………………………………………
14
Figure 3.8. Removal Parts ………………………………………………………………
14
Figure 3.9. Silicone Rubber Chain …………………………………………
16
Figure 3.10. Example of Tree Diagram …………………………………
39
Figure 3.11. Illustration of Fishbone Diagram …………
40
Figure 3.12. Example of Arrow Diagram ………………………………
42
Figure 3.13. Flow Diagram for Shaft with Torsion and
Bending Force Design Procedure
……………………………………………………………………………………………………
45
Figure 3.14. α Stress Concentration Factor of Taper
Key ………………………………………………………………………………………
49
Figure 3.15. Shear Stress on Taper Key ……………………………
52
Figure 3.16. Flow Diagram for Taper Key Design
Procedure ………………………………………………………………………
54
Figure 3.17. Flow Diagram for Axial Bearing Design
Procedure …………………………………………………………………………
56
Figure 4.1. Current Master Model Machine ………………………
58
Figure 5.1. Black Box System of Master Model Machine 61
Figure 5.2. Function Analysis of Master Model Machine
………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 61
xii
Figure 5.3. The Functional Decomposition Diagram for
The Current Spin Casting Machine ………………… 63
Figure 5.4. Hinge Substitute Material Selecting
Process ………………………………………………………………………………
71
Figure 5.5. Mild Steel of Hinge on Top Enclosure………
72
Figure 5.6. Upper Inlet Substitute Material Selecting
Process
………………………………………………………………………………
73
Figure 5.7. Handle Substitute Material Selecting
Process …………………………………………………………………………………
75
Figure 5.8. Mild Steel on Top Enclosure ……………………………
76
Figure 5.9. Forces on Shaft ……………………………………………………………
78
Figure 5.10. Forces of Belt Tension ……………………………………
79
Figure 5.11. Forces of Belt Tension Toward Z and X…
80
Figure 5.12. Reaction Forces Toward Z and X …………………
80
Figure 5.13. Reaction Forces Toward X and Y ………………
81
Figure 5.14. Bending Moment Diagram ……………………………………
82
Figure 5.15. The Modified Mold Frame Design of
Vulcanizer for Head Casting……………………………
88
Figure 5.16. Tree Diagram-The Best Design for Head
Casting …………………………………………………………………………………
Figure 5.17. Modified Mold Frame-Provide Balance……
89
90
Figure 5.18. Modified Mold Frame-Minimum Silicon Rubber
Usage ………………………………………………………………………………………
91
Figure 5.19. Counter-Grip Position …………………………………………
92
Figure 5.20. Illustration of Complete Head casting … 92
Figure 5.21. UCF four Flanged Bearing …………………………………
94
Figure 5.22. The Adaro Business Card Holder Product
Master ……………………………………………………………………………………
99
Figure 5.23. Figure of Tin Use …………………………………………………
100
Figure 5.24. Shrinkage after Vulcanizing Process……
101
xiii
Figure 5.25. Result Of Spin Casting Process on First
Trial …………………………………………………………………………………
102
Figure 5.26. Fishbone Diagram for Penetration Defect
…………………………………………………………………………………………………… 103
Figure 5.27. Tree Diagram for the Best Mold Frame
Design Related on Shrinkage at the Rubber
Mold ……………………………………………………………………………………
104
Figure 5.28. Dimesion Gap because of Shrinkage on
silicon Rubber Mold ……………………………………………
105
Figure 5.29. Result of Spin Casting Process at 34mm
Height ………………………………………………………………………………
106
Figure 5.30. Figure of Tin Selection …………………………………
106
Figure 5.31. Result of Spin Casting Process Using 50%
Tin in First Trial ………………………………………………… 107
Figure 5.32. Overview after Vulcanizing on Second Trial
…………………………………………………………………………………………………
109
Figure 5.33. Result of Spin Casting Process on Second
Trial …………………………………………………………………………………… 109
Figure 5.34. Fishbone Diagram for Penetration Defect
………………………………………………………………………………………………… 110
Figure 5.35. The New Dimension of New Mold Frame …
111
Figure 5.36. Result of Spin Casting Process Using 50%
Tin at Third Trial ………………………………………………… 112
Figure 5.37. Arrow Diagram of Casting Process …………… 113
Figure 6.1. New Master Model Machine …………………………………… 121
Figure 6.2. Thermocouple Setting ……………………………………………
121
Figure 6.3. MCB Turning On ……………………………………………………………
121
Figure 6.4. Cutting HTV Silicon Rubber ……………………………
121
Figure 6.5. Scaling Rubber ……………………………………………………………
122
Figure 6.6. Lubrication at the Mold Frame ……………………
122
xiv
Figure 6.7. Set Silicon Rubber With Master Product,
Sprue and Locknuts …………………………………………………
123
Figure 6.8. Lubrication at Silicon Rubber ……………………
123
Figure 6.9. Install the Upper Mold Frame ………………………
124
Figure 6.10. Turning Handle
………………………………………………………
124
Figure 6.11. Inserting the Mold Frame ………………………………
124
Figure 6.12. Pressing the Mold Frame …………………………………
125
Figure 6.13. MCB Turning Off ………………………………………………………
125
Figure 6.14. Pulling Out the Mold Frame …………………………
125
Figure 6.15. Open the Mold Frame ……………………………………………
126
Figure 6.16. Open Top Enclosure ………………………………………………
127
Figure 6.17. Load Silicon Rubber………………………………………………
127
Figure 6.18. Fasten the Mold Frame ………………………………………
127
Figure 6.19. Close Top Enclosure ……………………………………………
128
Figure 6.20. Connect Electrical Plug to the jack …
128
Figure 6.21. Turn the Switch On
……………………………………………
128
Figure 6.22. Pour the Molten Metal…………………………………………
129
Figure 6.23. Turn the Switch off ……………………………………………
129
Figure 6.24. Open Top Enclosure ………………………………………………
129
Figure 6.25. Remove Mold Frame …………………………………………………
130
Figure 6.26. Open Silicon Rubber Mold ………………………………
130
xv
APPENDIX CONTENTS
Appendix 1. Engineering Drawing
xvi
ABSTRACT
A master model is required before a product is
actually processed in a machine. A present research
build a prototype of master model machine in spin
casting technology which is not reliable for production
process.
The present master model machine was evaluated and
redesigned focused on the need of larger mold frame and
eliminate prop usage to enhance the reliability of
producing good quality of master product souvenirs made
from tin. The evaluation was started by constructing
Functional Decomposition Diagram. Later, the decomposed
part list was classified to its critical function based
on Function Analysis. Failure Modes Effects Analysis
(FMEA) was performed to evaluate failures of current
machine. Those failures were become input for redesign
process. Mechanical Design Procedure, Grid Analysis, and
Tree Diagram were performed during redesign process.
Some defects were found during experimental works of
Adaro business card holder using the new master model
machine. The Cause and Effect Diagram was performed to
find best solution to solve related problems.
By the end of the research, master model machine
with dimension 530mm x 440mm x 710mm; operating speed at
460 rpm; maximum silicone rubber dimension 204mm x 178mm
x 36mm ; electricity power 373 W and Adaro business card
holder product were obtained. The production time is 11,
15 minutes and the production cost per unit is IDR
10,500.00.
xvii