Endoscopic management of bile leaks after laparoscopic cholecystectomy
VoL7, No 3, July - September 1998
Endoscopic managementfor biliary
leaks
l6l
Endoscopic management of bile leaks after laparoscopic cholecystectomy
L.A. Lesmana
Abstrak
Kebocoran empedu didapatkan pada sebelas clari 16
Kebocoran terjadi di duktus sistikus pada 9 pasien dan di duktus
metode endoskopi. Terapi endoskopik meLiputi pemasangan stent
P
k
obilier untuk drainase pada 3 pasien.
4 prosedur tersebut. Endoskopi terape
p
Abstract
c
t inj urie s fo I low in g raparo
sc
op
ic c ho re cy s te c to my. Le ak o c c ur re d
by various endoscopic methods.
nts, and insertion of nasobiliary
significant compLications of the
Keywords : Endoscopic therapy - biliary reaks - Iaparoscopic chorecystectomy
INTRODUCTION
We report herein our experience in dealing with endo_
scopic management of biliary leaks following LC.
PATIENTS AND METHODS
From January 1993 to December
I99l
data of sixteen
return to work.
However, biliary complications after LC, noticeable
bile duct leaks, is reported from O.3Vo to 3.0Vo com_
ERCP was performed
technique under
intravenous sedation
cope (Olympus,
Japan) type JF IT 20,
me inrerval from
,g
the ERCP procedure, clinical symptoms, and
lC
liver functions were noted.
Several studies have shown the effectiveness of endo_
scopic sphincterotomy alone or in combination with
stent placement or insertion of nasobiliarv tube
drainage in healing biliary leaks.8-14
, Department of Medicine, Faculty of
Indonesia, Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo
nesia
Diagnosis of bile Ieaks was made at ERCP demonsrrat_
ing contrast extravasation from the biliary tract. Endo_
scopic techniques to resolve the biliary lèaks included
stent placement alone or in combination with endo_
or insertion of nasobiliary
as only performed if canduct could not be achieved
with a standard diagnostic catheter. There was no cer_
162
Lesmana
Med J Indones
tain criteria in selecting the method of endoscopic
Table 2. Therapeutic ERCP interventions
interventions. A 7 Fr endoprosthesis was placed above
the site of leak in all stented patients.
Endoscopic procedure
In
general, the stent was removed after four to six
weeks of placement without control cholangiogram
except in one patient with big leak at the common bile
duct. A tube cholangiography was performed after two
weeks of insertion in patients with NBT drainage.
Stenting alone
Stent placement and sphincterotomy
Insertion of nasobiliary tube
Total
in
N
11 patients
Vn
3
46
27
27
1l
t00
5
J
Ultrasound using real time scanner (Toshiba SSA2701' Japan) and spiral CT-Scan of the abdomen
(Siemens Somatom+4, Germany) were carried out in
five and one patients respectively to evaluate the
presence of biloma.
RESULTS
Over the study period, bile leaks were detected in
eleven of l6 patients with biliary complications related
to LC. In the other five patients stricture of the common
hepatic duct was obtained in two and total duct obstruction in the remaining three patients. Diagnostic ERCP
findings of these 16 patients were shown in table
Table
l.
l.
Diagnostic ERCP findings in l6 patients with biliary
complications related to LC
q
Bile duct injury
Biliary leaks
Stricture of common hepatic duct
Total duct obstruction
Total
11
69
2
12
J
l9
16
100
Figure l. Endoscopic retograde cholangiogram in apatient
with cystic duct leak shows extravasation of contrast into
peritoneal cavity that responded to stent placement
The group study consisted of eleven patients; eight
males and three females with an average age of 46
years (range 26 to 10 years). The mean interval of LC
to the ERCP procedure was 6.3 days (range 3 to 12
days). The most common presenting symptom was
abdominal pain found in 10 of I I patients (9lVo),fever
in 7 patients and jaundice in 2 patients.
During ERCP, biliary leaks were demonstrated in all
patients. Cystic duct leak was detected in 9 patients
whereas leak at the common bile duct in the other 2
patients. Therapeutic ERCP interventions were successful in all these I I patients (table 2). Stent placement alone was performed in five of 1 I patients (figure
l), ES with bilio-endoprostheses in three patients, and
insertion of NBT drainage
in the remaining
three
patients (figure 2). In one patient with big leak at the
common bile duct (CBD) the stent placement was
extended up to 8 weeks because control cholangiography after 4 weeks still shqwed extravazation of small
amount of contrast.
F i gure
g io gram afte r lap aro s c opic c ho Ie cy s t ec t omy
biliary leak (arrow) that successfully teated by
2. Cho lan
demonstrates
insertion of nasobiliary tube drainage
Vol 7, No 3, JulS, - Septenùer 1998
Endos
Additional duct fïndings at ERCP were stones in the
CBD in five parients which being extracted wrth a
dormia basket at the same session of stent or NBT
removal. Complications of endoscopic therapy oc_
curred in three patients. Bleeding after ES occurrecl in
two patients with CBD stones which could be managed
conservatively and stent migration into the colon was
detected in the remaining one patient. The stent came
ouI spontaneously with the stool.
C
ie
la
performed in
c
op
ic nlana
g
e
nrc nt fo
r
b i Lia
ry leaks
r63
and NBT decompression, are effective methods tbr
healing post LC biliary leaks.8-la
The presumed beneflt of endoscopic therapy is tlre
of sphinter Oddi pressure. The clecrease
resistance across the ampula therefbre cliverts bilc
flow into the duodenum and away fiom the site ol'
injured bile duct. Although reducrion of ampLrllary
pressure is widely accepted as an impor[ant factr_rr in
resolving biliary leaks, the best endoscopic nrethocl to
achieve this has not been well studied.
reduction
the presence
vity and sub-
Some experts have claimed that
NBT clrainagc
has
some potential advantages compared to stenting.l3.l9
First, NBT provides maximal and direct bile
cluct
DISCUSSION
The reasons for ductal injury at LC include variation
anatomy, technically difficult dissection due to severe
patients). Stent placement is more convenient for
patients and enable them to return to their activity
faster compared to those who are receiving NBT.
occurs when loose clips dislodge or the cystic duct
remnant necroses. Our study confirms that most of the
Pain, which was detected inglVo of patients, was the
môst common symptom at clinical presentation consis_
tent with biliary peritonitis. The mean inrerval of LC
dure in our
er than that
t.e'13 Thi, d
hr be parrly
e lack of the
facilities in
our country.
Some
useful
a nega
While
hat cho
s
afterl
le out
is
a
not
institution, ERCP demonstrated the presence of bile
in l)OVo patients in our series.
leaks
Therefore, we
directly to the
Iowing LC, as
on to perform ERCP
specteà bile leaks fol_
e.r.l l'18
Our results also support the other findings that
therapeutic ERCP procedures, such as stent placement
Ste
the
t2'I
be
On
we
have also been reported
f
as
in other series.lorecent studles,dJ? ,r.n,.on
choice
for 4 to 6 weeks in most of the patients.
nt in our series required stenting fbr g
of big leak ar rhe CBD.
In conclusion, both stent placement ancl nasobiliary
tube drainage are safe and effective encloscopic
therapy for bile leaks following Iaparoscopic cholecys_
tectomy.
REFERENCES
l.
Schirmer BD, Edge SB, Dix J, Hyser MJ, Hanks JB, Jones
RC. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy, treatment of choicc fbr
symptomatic choleli tiasi s. Ann Surg 1 99 I :2 I 3 :665 _7 .
2. Southern Surgeons Club. A prospective analysis ol l-5 l8
laparoscopic cholecystectomies.
l99l:324:1073-8.
N Eng J
Mctl
3. Peter JH, Cibbons GD, lnnes JT. Complications of laparo_
scopic cholecystectomy. Surgery l99l ;l l0:769_7g.
4. Rossi RL, Schirmer WJ, Braasch JW. Laparoscopic bile duct
injuries. Arch Surg I 992 1 2j :569 _602.
5. Deziel DJ, Millikan KW, Economou SG, Doolas A, Tao Ko
Airan
a
analysis of 7
Sung,
scopic cholecys_
ospitals ancl an
tectomy:
6. Achmadsyah
165:9-14.
I.
Perkembangan bedah laparoskopik cli In_
donesia. Ropanasuri 1996.24: l -7
.
164
Lesmana
7. Woods MS, Traverso LW, Kozarek RA, Tsao J, Rossi RL,
Gough D, et al. Characteristic of biliary complications
during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. A multi institutional
study. Am J Surg 1994;167:27-33.
8. Foutch PG, Harlan JR, Hoefer M. Endoscopic therapy for
patients with a post-operative biliary leak. Gastrointest Endosc 1992;39:416-21.
9. Brooks DC, Becker JN, Connors pJ, Carr-Locke DL.
Management of bile leaks following Iaparoscopic choleiystectomy. Surg Endosc 19931,7 :292-5.
10. Kozarek KA, Ball TJ, Patterson DJ, Brandabur JJ, Raltz S,
Traverso LW. Endoscopic treatment of biliary injury in the
era of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Gastrointest Endosc
1994;40:10-16.
ll.
Raijman I, Catalano MF, Hirsch GS, Mac Fadyen B,
Broughan TA, Chung RS, et al. Endoscopic treatment of
biliary leakage after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Endos-
copy 19941'26:741-4.
12. Himal HS. The role of ERCP in laparoscopic cholecystec-
tomy-related cystic duct stump leaks. Surg Endosc
I
996: l0:653-5.
Med J Indones
13. Chou S, Bosco JJ, Heiss FW. Successful treatment of post-
cholecystectomy bile leaks using nasobiliary tube drainage
and sphincterotomy. Am J Gasrroenterol l99j;92 1839-43.
14. Ryan ME, Geenen JE, Lehman GA, Aliperti G, Freeman
ML, Silverman WB, et al. Endoscopic intervention for
biliary leaks aftei laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a multicenter revi ew. Gastrointest Endosc 1998 ;4j :261 -6.
15.
Davidoff AM, Pappas TN, Murray EA. Mechanisms of
maj or biliary injury duri n g I aparoscopi c cholecystectomy.
Ann Surg 1992;21
5 : 19
6-202.
16. Asbun HJ, Rossi RL, Lowell JA, Munson JL.
Bileducrinjury
during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: mechanism of injury,
prevention and management. World J Surg 1993;17:547 -52.
17. Brugge WR, Rosenberg DJ, Alawi A. Diagnosis of postoperative bile leaks. Am J Gastroenterol 1994;89:2178-83.
18. Prat F, Pelletier G, Ponchan T, Fritsch J, Meduri B, Boyer J,
et al. What role can endoscopy play in the management of
biliary complications after laparoscopic cholecystectomy ?
Endoscopy 1997 ;29 :341 -8.
19. Barhee JB, Scheider D. Advantages of sphincterotomy and
nasobiliary tube drainage in the treatment of cystic duct
stump leak complicating laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Arn
J Gastroenterol 199 5 ;90 1322-24.
Endoscopic managementfor biliary
leaks
l6l
Endoscopic management of bile leaks after laparoscopic cholecystectomy
L.A. Lesmana
Abstrak
Kebocoran empedu didapatkan pada sebelas clari 16
Kebocoran terjadi di duktus sistikus pada 9 pasien dan di duktus
metode endoskopi. Terapi endoskopik meLiputi pemasangan stent
P
k
obilier untuk drainase pada 3 pasien.
4 prosedur tersebut. Endoskopi terape
p
Abstract
c
t inj urie s fo I low in g raparo
sc
op
ic c ho re cy s te c to my. Le ak o c c ur re d
by various endoscopic methods.
nts, and insertion of nasobiliary
significant compLications of the
Keywords : Endoscopic therapy - biliary reaks - Iaparoscopic chorecystectomy
INTRODUCTION
We report herein our experience in dealing with endo_
scopic management of biliary leaks following LC.
PATIENTS AND METHODS
From January 1993 to December
I99l
data of sixteen
return to work.
However, biliary complications after LC, noticeable
bile duct leaks, is reported from O.3Vo to 3.0Vo com_
ERCP was performed
technique under
intravenous sedation
cope (Olympus,
Japan) type JF IT 20,
me inrerval from
,g
the ERCP procedure, clinical symptoms, and
lC
liver functions were noted.
Several studies have shown the effectiveness of endo_
scopic sphincterotomy alone or in combination with
stent placement or insertion of nasobiliarv tube
drainage in healing biliary leaks.8-14
, Department of Medicine, Faculty of
Indonesia, Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo
nesia
Diagnosis of bile Ieaks was made at ERCP demonsrrat_
ing contrast extravasation from the biliary tract. Endo_
scopic techniques to resolve the biliary lèaks included
stent placement alone or in combination with endo_
or insertion of nasobiliary
as only performed if canduct could not be achieved
with a standard diagnostic catheter. There was no cer_
162
Lesmana
Med J Indones
tain criteria in selecting the method of endoscopic
Table 2. Therapeutic ERCP interventions
interventions. A 7 Fr endoprosthesis was placed above
the site of leak in all stented patients.
Endoscopic procedure
In
general, the stent was removed after four to six
weeks of placement without control cholangiogram
except in one patient with big leak at the common bile
duct. A tube cholangiography was performed after two
weeks of insertion in patients with NBT drainage.
Stenting alone
Stent placement and sphincterotomy
Insertion of nasobiliary tube
Total
in
N
11 patients
Vn
3
46
27
27
1l
t00
5
J
Ultrasound using real time scanner (Toshiba SSA2701' Japan) and spiral CT-Scan of the abdomen
(Siemens Somatom+4, Germany) were carried out in
five and one patients respectively to evaluate the
presence of biloma.
RESULTS
Over the study period, bile leaks were detected in
eleven of l6 patients with biliary complications related
to LC. In the other five patients stricture of the common
hepatic duct was obtained in two and total duct obstruction in the remaining three patients. Diagnostic ERCP
findings of these 16 patients were shown in table
Table
l.
l.
Diagnostic ERCP findings in l6 patients with biliary
complications related to LC
q
Bile duct injury
Biliary leaks
Stricture of common hepatic duct
Total duct obstruction
Total
11
69
2
12
J
l9
16
100
Figure l. Endoscopic retograde cholangiogram in apatient
with cystic duct leak shows extravasation of contrast into
peritoneal cavity that responded to stent placement
The group study consisted of eleven patients; eight
males and three females with an average age of 46
years (range 26 to 10 years). The mean interval of LC
to the ERCP procedure was 6.3 days (range 3 to 12
days). The most common presenting symptom was
abdominal pain found in 10 of I I patients (9lVo),fever
in 7 patients and jaundice in 2 patients.
During ERCP, biliary leaks were demonstrated in all
patients. Cystic duct leak was detected in 9 patients
whereas leak at the common bile duct in the other 2
patients. Therapeutic ERCP interventions were successful in all these I I patients (table 2). Stent placement alone was performed in five of 1 I patients (figure
l), ES with bilio-endoprostheses in three patients, and
insertion of NBT drainage
in the remaining
three
patients (figure 2). In one patient with big leak at the
common bile duct (CBD) the stent placement was
extended up to 8 weeks because control cholangiography after 4 weeks still shqwed extravazation of small
amount of contrast.
F i gure
g io gram afte r lap aro s c opic c ho Ie cy s t ec t omy
biliary leak (arrow) that successfully teated by
2. Cho lan
demonstrates
insertion of nasobiliary tube drainage
Vol 7, No 3, JulS, - Septenùer 1998
Endos
Additional duct fïndings at ERCP were stones in the
CBD in five parients which being extracted wrth a
dormia basket at the same session of stent or NBT
removal. Complications of endoscopic therapy oc_
curred in three patients. Bleeding after ES occurrecl in
two patients with CBD stones which could be managed
conservatively and stent migration into the colon was
detected in the remaining one patient. The stent came
ouI spontaneously with the stool.
C
ie
la
performed in
c
op
ic nlana
g
e
nrc nt fo
r
b i Lia
ry leaks
r63
and NBT decompression, are effective methods tbr
healing post LC biliary leaks.8-la
The presumed beneflt of endoscopic therapy is tlre
of sphinter Oddi pressure. The clecrease
resistance across the ampula therefbre cliverts bilc
flow into the duodenum and away fiom the site ol'
injured bile duct. Although reducrion of ampLrllary
pressure is widely accepted as an impor[ant factr_rr in
resolving biliary leaks, the best endoscopic nrethocl to
achieve this has not been well studied.
reduction
the presence
vity and sub-
Some experts have claimed that
NBT clrainagc
has
some potential advantages compared to stenting.l3.l9
First, NBT provides maximal and direct bile
cluct
DISCUSSION
The reasons for ductal injury at LC include variation
anatomy, technically difficult dissection due to severe
patients). Stent placement is more convenient for
patients and enable them to return to their activity
faster compared to those who are receiving NBT.
occurs when loose clips dislodge or the cystic duct
remnant necroses. Our study confirms that most of the
Pain, which was detected inglVo of patients, was the
môst common symptom at clinical presentation consis_
tent with biliary peritonitis. The mean inrerval of LC
dure in our
er than that
t.e'13 Thi, d
hr be parrly
e lack of the
facilities in
our country.
Some
useful
a nega
While
hat cho
s
afterl
le out
is
a
not
institution, ERCP demonstrated the presence of bile
in l)OVo patients in our series.
leaks
Therefore, we
directly to the
Iowing LC, as
on to perform ERCP
specteà bile leaks fol_
e.r.l l'18
Our results also support the other findings that
therapeutic ERCP procedures, such as stent placement
Ste
the
t2'I
be
On
we
have also been reported
f
as
in other series.lorecent studles,dJ? ,r.n,.on
choice
for 4 to 6 weeks in most of the patients.
nt in our series required stenting fbr g
of big leak ar rhe CBD.
In conclusion, both stent placement ancl nasobiliary
tube drainage are safe and effective encloscopic
therapy for bile leaks following Iaparoscopic cholecys_
tectomy.
REFERENCES
l.
Schirmer BD, Edge SB, Dix J, Hyser MJ, Hanks JB, Jones
RC. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy, treatment of choicc fbr
symptomatic choleli tiasi s. Ann Surg 1 99 I :2 I 3 :665 _7 .
2. Southern Surgeons Club. A prospective analysis ol l-5 l8
laparoscopic cholecystectomies.
l99l:324:1073-8.
N Eng J
Mctl
3. Peter JH, Cibbons GD, lnnes JT. Complications of laparo_
scopic cholecystectomy. Surgery l99l ;l l0:769_7g.
4. Rossi RL, Schirmer WJ, Braasch JW. Laparoscopic bile duct
injuries. Arch Surg I 992 1 2j :569 _602.
5. Deziel DJ, Millikan KW, Economou SG, Doolas A, Tao Ko
Airan
a
analysis of 7
Sung,
scopic cholecys_
ospitals ancl an
tectomy:
6. Achmadsyah
165:9-14.
I.
Perkembangan bedah laparoskopik cli In_
donesia. Ropanasuri 1996.24: l -7
.
164
Lesmana
7. Woods MS, Traverso LW, Kozarek RA, Tsao J, Rossi RL,
Gough D, et al. Characteristic of biliary complications
during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. A multi institutional
study. Am J Surg 1994;167:27-33.
8. Foutch PG, Harlan JR, Hoefer M. Endoscopic therapy for
patients with a post-operative biliary leak. Gastrointest Endosc 1992;39:416-21.
9. Brooks DC, Becker JN, Connors pJ, Carr-Locke DL.
Management of bile leaks following Iaparoscopic choleiystectomy. Surg Endosc 19931,7 :292-5.
10. Kozarek KA, Ball TJ, Patterson DJ, Brandabur JJ, Raltz S,
Traverso LW. Endoscopic treatment of biliary injury in the
era of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Gastrointest Endosc
1994;40:10-16.
ll.
Raijman I, Catalano MF, Hirsch GS, Mac Fadyen B,
Broughan TA, Chung RS, et al. Endoscopic treatment of
biliary leakage after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Endos-
copy 19941'26:741-4.
12. Himal HS. The role of ERCP in laparoscopic cholecystec-
tomy-related cystic duct stump leaks. Surg Endosc
I
996: l0:653-5.
Med J Indones
13. Chou S, Bosco JJ, Heiss FW. Successful treatment of post-
cholecystectomy bile leaks using nasobiliary tube drainage
and sphincterotomy. Am J Gasrroenterol l99j;92 1839-43.
14. Ryan ME, Geenen JE, Lehman GA, Aliperti G, Freeman
ML, Silverman WB, et al. Endoscopic intervention for
biliary leaks aftei laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a multicenter revi ew. Gastrointest Endosc 1998 ;4j :261 -6.
15.
Davidoff AM, Pappas TN, Murray EA. Mechanisms of
maj or biliary injury duri n g I aparoscopi c cholecystectomy.
Ann Surg 1992;21
5 : 19
6-202.
16. Asbun HJ, Rossi RL, Lowell JA, Munson JL.
Bileducrinjury
during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: mechanism of injury,
prevention and management. World J Surg 1993;17:547 -52.
17. Brugge WR, Rosenberg DJ, Alawi A. Diagnosis of postoperative bile leaks. Am J Gastroenterol 1994;89:2178-83.
18. Prat F, Pelletier G, Ponchan T, Fritsch J, Meduri B, Boyer J,
et al. What role can endoscopy play in the management of
biliary complications after laparoscopic cholecystectomy ?
Endoscopy 1997 ;29 :341 -8.
19. Barhee JB, Scheider D. Advantages of sphincterotomy and
nasobiliary tube drainage in the treatment of cystic duct
stump leak complicating laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Arn
J Gastroenterol 199 5 ;90 1322-24.