AN ANALYSIS OF COMMUNICATION STRATEGIES USED BY ENGLISH TUTORIAL PROGRAM STUDENTS IN SPEAKING CLASS: An Analysis Of Communication Strategies Used By English Tutorial Program Students In Speaking Class: Naturalistic Study At Departement Of Accounting Educ
AN ANALYSIS OF COMMUNICATION STRATEGIES USED BY ENGLISH
TUTORIAL PROGRAM STUDENTS IN SPEAKING CLASS:
NATURALISTIC STUDY AT DEPARTEMENT OF ACCOUNTING
EDUCATION AT MUHAMMADIYAH UNIVERSITY OF SURAKARTA
RESEARCH PAPER
Submitted as a Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements
for Getting Bachelor Degree of Education
in English Department
by
Dara Puspitasari
A320130083
DEPARTMENT OF ENGLISH EDUCATION
SCHOOL OF TEACHER TRAINING AND EDUCATION
UNIVERSITAS MUHAMMADIYAH SURAKARTA
2017
TESTIMONY
I am here the researcher,
signed on the statement below:
Name
: Dara Puspitasari
NIM
: A320130083
Study/Program
: Departement
Title
:
of English Education
An Analysis of Communication Strategies Used by English
Tutorial Program Sudents in Speaking: Naturalistic Study at
Departement
of
Accounting Education
a1
Muhammadiyah
University of Surakarta
I testify that in this research paper there is no plagiarism of previous literary
works which have been raised to obtain bachelor degree ofcertain univercity, nor
there are opinions or masterpieces which have been written
or published by others,
except those in which the writting are reffered in the manuscript and mentioned in
literary review and bibliography.
Hence later, if it is proven that there are some untrue statements in this
testimony, I will be fully responsible.
Surakarta, December 23,2016
The writer
,'&*
'
Dara Puspitasari
A320130083
APPROVAL
AN ANALYSIS OF COMMUNICATION STRATEGIES USED BY ENGLISH
TUTORIAL PROGRAM STUDENTS IN SPEAKING CLASS: NATURALISTIC
STUDY AT DEPARTEMENT OF ACCOUNTING EDUCATION AT
MUHAMMADIYAH UNIVERSITY OF SURAKARTA
RESEARCII PAPER
By:
Dara Puspitasari
A320I30083
Approved by Consultant:
Fa
uziati, iVI.Hum
NIK.237
It
ACCEPTANCE
A:\ AN,ALYSIS OF COMNTTJNICATION STRATIiGIES USED BY ENGLISH
TUTORIAL PROGRANI STUDENTS IN SPEAKING CLASS:
NATI]RALISTIC STUDY AT DEPARTEN{ENT OF ACCOUNTING
F,DIICATION AT MUHANIMADIYAH UNIVERSITY OF SURAI'{RTA
By
DARA PUSPITASARI
A320130083
Accepted and Approved by Board of Examiners
School of Teacher Training and Education
Muhammadiyah University of Surakarta
on March 06,2017
Team of Examiners:
l. Prof. Dr. Endang Fauziati, M.Hum.
(First Examiner)
2. Muamaroh, Ph.D
( Second Examiner)
3. Koesoemo
Ratih, S.Pd. M.Hum
(Third Examiner)
| . .,)-.(:
Joko Prayitno
MOTTO
“Go ahead without kicking them out
Go up without putting it down
Be kind without making others wrong
And be true without blaming others”
v
DEDICATION
This research paper is dedicate to:
My beloved father who cares the writer with his full love,
“Tunjung Pambudi, S.Pd.”
My beloved mother who gives strength to the writer,
“Susi Ratna Sari Mulia Rosa”
My beloved brother and sister,
“ Bonis Bernas Pambudi S.Pd. and Dita Ayu Permatasari S. Farm, Apt.”
My beloved husband who gives strength to the writer and always beside me,
“Mahesa Jati Kusuma, S.H. M.H.”
vi
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
Assalamu’alaikum Warohmatullohi Wabarokatuh
Alhamdulillahirobbil’alamin, all prises belong to Allah SWT to his
blessing nd mercies given to the researcher, she can complete the research paper
entitled “ An Analysis of Communication Strategies Used by English Tutorial
Program Students in Speaking Class: Naturalistic Study at Departement of
Accounting Education at hammadiyah University of Surakarta.” In conducting
this research, the researcher got some helps from many people. On the best
occasion, the researcher would like to express her deepest gratitude and
appreciation to the following people:
1. Prof. Dr. Harun Joko Prayitno, Dean of School of Teacher Training
and Education Faculty.
2. Mauly Halwat Hikmah, Ph.D, Head of English Departement, for
approving this research.
3. Prof. Dr. Endang Fauziati, M.Hum., consultant who gives guidance,
advice, suggestion, information and correction, from the beginning of
preparation of writing research paper up to complete of it.
4. Muamaroh, Ph.D., the second examiner who gives her suggestion and
careful correction to improve the research paper.
5. Koesoemo Ratih, S.Pd.M.Hum., the third examiner who gives her
suggestion and careful correction to improve the research paper.
6. All lectures of English Departement of Muhammadiyah University of
Surakarta who have taught ger many things.
7. Her beloved family: my father, Tunjung Pambudi, my mother, Susi
Ratna Sari Mulia Rosa, my brother and sister, Bonis Bernas
Pambudi and Dita Ayu Permata Sari, the last is my little family,
Mahesa Jati Kusuma and my baby.. “ Thank you very much for the
vii
motivation, support and prays for the writer throughtout her entire
study.”
8. Her all friends. “Thank you so much”
The last, her thanks are addressed to the readers who are willing to read
the research paper. The writer realizes that the research paper is still far from
being perfect. Therefore supportive criticism and suggestion are really
welcomed and badly needed to makes this researh paper better.
Wassalamu’alaikum Warohmatullohi Wabarokatuh
Surakarta, March 17, 2017
Dara Puspitasari
viii
TABLE OF CONTENT
TITLE
TESTIMONY.............................................................................................................. ii
APPROVAL............................................................................................................... iii
ACCEPTANCE.......................................................................................................... iv
MOTTO....................................................................................................................... v
DEDICATION............................................................................................................ vi
ACKNOWLADGMENT........................................................................................... vii
TABLE OF CONTENT.............................................................................................. ix
ABSTRAK.................................................................................................................. xi
ABSTRACT.............................................................................................................. xii
CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION................................................................................ 1
A. Background of the Study.................................................................... 1
B. Scope of the Study.............................................................................. 3
C. Problem Statement.............................................................................. 4
D. Objective of the Study........................................................................ 4
E. Significance of the Study.................................................................... 4
F. Research Paper Outlines..................................................................... 5
CHAPTER II : REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE......................................... 6
A. Previous Study.................................................................................... 6
B. Underlying Theory............................................................................ 12
1. Speaking Skill............................................................................. 12
2. Communicative Competence...................................................... 13
3. Communication Strategies.......................................................... 15
CHAPTER III : RESEARCH METHOD.................................................................. 21
ix
A. Type of the Study............................................................................... 21
B. Subject of the Study........................................................................... 21
C. Object of the Study............................................................................ 22
D. Place and Time the Study.................................................................. 22
E. Data and Sources of Data................................................................... 22
F. Technique of Collecting Data............................................................ 23
G. Techniques of Analyzing Data........................................................... 23
H. Data Validity...................................................................................... 24
CHAPTER IV : RESEARCH FINDING AND DISCUSSION................................ 25
A. Research Finding............................................................................... 25
1. Type of Communication Strategies Used by Students............... 25
2. Frequency of Communication Strategies..................................... 32
3. Dominant Type of Communication Strategies............................ 32
B. Discussion of the Finding.................................................................. 33
CHAPTER V : CONCLUSION, PEDAGOGICAL IMPLICATION, AND
SUGGESTION................................................................................... 40
A. Conclusion......................................................................................... 40
B. Pedagogical Implication..................................................................... 41
C. Suggestion.......................................................................................... 42
BIBLIOGRAPHY
APPENDIX
x
Abstrak
Dara Puspitasari, A320130083. An Analysis of Communication Strategies Used
by English Tutorial Program Students in Speaking Class: Naturalistic Study at
Departement of Accounting Education at hammadiyah University of Surakarta.
Skripsi Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan, Universitas Muhammadiyah
Surakarta. Maret, 2017.
Penelitian ini mendeskripsikan tentang strategi komunikasi yang digunakan
oleh mahasiswa English Tutorial Program di kelas speaking dari Departemen
Akutansi di Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta. Penelitian ini mendeskripsikan 3
komponen, (1) Tipe
strategi komunikasi yang digunakan oleh maha siswa, (2)
Frekuensi tipe strategi komunikasi, (3) Dominan
strategi komunikasi yang
digunakan oleh mahasiswa. Data dalam penelian ini adalah strategi komunikasi
yang digunakan oleh mahasiswa English Tutorial Program di kelas speaking dari
Departemen Akutansi di Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta.
menggunakan 3 kelompok
Peneliti
English Tutorial Program, dengan jumlah 30 siswa
sebagai subjek. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode deskriptif kualitatif. Penulis
meneliti data menggunakan taksonomi dari Dornyei. Penulis menemukan 6 subtipe
dari 2 tipe taksonomi dari Dornyei. Tipe yang paling dominan digunakan oleh
mahasiswa adalah Stalling or Time Gaining dengan 56,49%, Code Switching,
Appeal For Help, Message Abandonment, Literal Translation, dan yang paling jarang
digunakan yaitu Non-Linguistic Signals dengan 1,67%.
Hal ini dapat ditarik
kesimpulan bahwa strategi komunikasi dibutuhkan oleh siswa dan dapat digunakan
sebagai materi di kelas berbicara. Sehingga siswa dapat bekomunikasi secara lancar.
Kata Kunci : Berbicara, Strategi Komunikasi
xi
Abstract
Dara Puspitasari, A320130083. An Analysis of Communication Strategies Used
by English Tutorial Program Students in Speaking Class: Naturalistic Study at
Departement of Accounting Education at hammadiyah University of Surakarta.
Research Paper. School of Teacher Training and Education Muhammadiyah
University of Surakarta. March, 2017.
This study decribed communication strategies used by English Tutorial
Program students in speaking class: naturalistic study at Accounting Education
Departement at Muhammadiyah University of Surakarta. This study described three
components, (1) The type of communication strategies used by students, (2)
Frequency the type of communication strategies, (3) The dominant communication
strategies used by students. The data of this study is communication strategies used
by English Tutorial Pogram students in speaking class: naturalistic study at
Accounting Departement at Muhhamadiyah University of Surakarta. Researcher uses
3 groups of English Tutorial Program with 30 students as a subject. This study used
descriptif kualitatif. Researcher analysis uses Dornyei’s Taxonomy. The researcher
found 2 types with six subtypes of Dornye’s Taxonomy. The dominant type used by
students is Stalling or Time Gaining with 56,49%, Code Switching, Appeal For Help,
Message Abandonment, Literal Translation, and the rarely type used by students is
Non-Linguistic Signals with 1,67%. It is can conclude that communication strategy
takes students and can be used as materials in speaking class. So that students can
communicate fluently.
Keyword : Speaking, Communication Strategies
xii
TUTORIAL PROGRAM STUDENTS IN SPEAKING CLASS:
NATURALISTIC STUDY AT DEPARTEMENT OF ACCOUNTING
EDUCATION AT MUHAMMADIYAH UNIVERSITY OF SURAKARTA
RESEARCH PAPER
Submitted as a Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements
for Getting Bachelor Degree of Education
in English Department
by
Dara Puspitasari
A320130083
DEPARTMENT OF ENGLISH EDUCATION
SCHOOL OF TEACHER TRAINING AND EDUCATION
UNIVERSITAS MUHAMMADIYAH SURAKARTA
2017
TESTIMONY
I am here the researcher,
signed on the statement below:
Name
: Dara Puspitasari
NIM
: A320130083
Study/Program
: Departement
Title
:
of English Education
An Analysis of Communication Strategies Used by English
Tutorial Program Sudents in Speaking: Naturalistic Study at
Departement
of
Accounting Education
a1
Muhammadiyah
University of Surakarta
I testify that in this research paper there is no plagiarism of previous literary
works which have been raised to obtain bachelor degree ofcertain univercity, nor
there are opinions or masterpieces which have been written
or published by others,
except those in which the writting are reffered in the manuscript and mentioned in
literary review and bibliography.
Hence later, if it is proven that there are some untrue statements in this
testimony, I will be fully responsible.
Surakarta, December 23,2016
The writer
,'&*
'
Dara Puspitasari
A320130083
APPROVAL
AN ANALYSIS OF COMMUNICATION STRATEGIES USED BY ENGLISH
TUTORIAL PROGRAM STUDENTS IN SPEAKING CLASS: NATURALISTIC
STUDY AT DEPARTEMENT OF ACCOUNTING EDUCATION AT
MUHAMMADIYAH UNIVERSITY OF SURAKARTA
RESEARCII PAPER
By:
Dara Puspitasari
A320I30083
Approved by Consultant:
Fa
uziati, iVI.Hum
NIK.237
It
ACCEPTANCE
A:\ AN,ALYSIS OF COMNTTJNICATION STRATIiGIES USED BY ENGLISH
TUTORIAL PROGRANI STUDENTS IN SPEAKING CLASS:
NATI]RALISTIC STUDY AT DEPARTEN{ENT OF ACCOUNTING
F,DIICATION AT MUHANIMADIYAH UNIVERSITY OF SURAI'{RTA
By
DARA PUSPITASARI
A320130083
Accepted and Approved by Board of Examiners
School of Teacher Training and Education
Muhammadiyah University of Surakarta
on March 06,2017
Team of Examiners:
l. Prof. Dr. Endang Fauziati, M.Hum.
(First Examiner)
2. Muamaroh, Ph.D
( Second Examiner)
3. Koesoemo
Ratih, S.Pd. M.Hum
(Third Examiner)
| . .,)-.(:
Joko Prayitno
MOTTO
“Go ahead without kicking them out
Go up without putting it down
Be kind without making others wrong
And be true without blaming others”
v
DEDICATION
This research paper is dedicate to:
My beloved father who cares the writer with his full love,
“Tunjung Pambudi, S.Pd.”
My beloved mother who gives strength to the writer,
“Susi Ratna Sari Mulia Rosa”
My beloved brother and sister,
“ Bonis Bernas Pambudi S.Pd. and Dita Ayu Permatasari S. Farm, Apt.”
My beloved husband who gives strength to the writer and always beside me,
“Mahesa Jati Kusuma, S.H. M.H.”
vi
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
Assalamu’alaikum Warohmatullohi Wabarokatuh
Alhamdulillahirobbil’alamin, all prises belong to Allah SWT to his
blessing nd mercies given to the researcher, she can complete the research paper
entitled “ An Analysis of Communication Strategies Used by English Tutorial
Program Students in Speaking Class: Naturalistic Study at Departement of
Accounting Education at hammadiyah University of Surakarta.” In conducting
this research, the researcher got some helps from many people. On the best
occasion, the researcher would like to express her deepest gratitude and
appreciation to the following people:
1. Prof. Dr. Harun Joko Prayitno, Dean of School of Teacher Training
and Education Faculty.
2. Mauly Halwat Hikmah, Ph.D, Head of English Departement, for
approving this research.
3. Prof. Dr. Endang Fauziati, M.Hum., consultant who gives guidance,
advice, suggestion, information and correction, from the beginning of
preparation of writing research paper up to complete of it.
4. Muamaroh, Ph.D., the second examiner who gives her suggestion and
careful correction to improve the research paper.
5. Koesoemo Ratih, S.Pd.M.Hum., the third examiner who gives her
suggestion and careful correction to improve the research paper.
6. All lectures of English Departement of Muhammadiyah University of
Surakarta who have taught ger many things.
7. Her beloved family: my father, Tunjung Pambudi, my mother, Susi
Ratna Sari Mulia Rosa, my brother and sister, Bonis Bernas
Pambudi and Dita Ayu Permata Sari, the last is my little family,
Mahesa Jati Kusuma and my baby.. “ Thank you very much for the
vii
motivation, support and prays for the writer throughtout her entire
study.”
8. Her all friends. “Thank you so much”
The last, her thanks are addressed to the readers who are willing to read
the research paper. The writer realizes that the research paper is still far from
being perfect. Therefore supportive criticism and suggestion are really
welcomed and badly needed to makes this researh paper better.
Wassalamu’alaikum Warohmatullohi Wabarokatuh
Surakarta, March 17, 2017
Dara Puspitasari
viii
TABLE OF CONTENT
TITLE
TESTIMONY.............................................................................................................. ii
APPROVAL............................................................................................................... iii
ACCEPTANCE.......................................................................................................... iv
MOTTO....................................................................................................................... v
DEDICATION............................................................................................................ vi
ACKNOWLADGMENT........................................................................................... vii
TABLE OF CONTENT.............................................................................................. ix
ABSTRAK.................................................................................................................. xi
ABSTRACT.............................................................................................................. xii
CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION................................................................................ 1
A. Background of the Study.................................................................... 1
B. Scope of the Study.............................................................................. 3
C. Problem Statement.............................................................................. 4
D. Objective of the Study........................................................................ 4
E. Significance of the Study.................................................................... 4
F. Research Paper Outlines..................................................................... 5
CHAPTER II : REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE......................................... 6
A. Previous Study.................................................................................... 6
B. Underlying Theory............................................................................ 12
1. Speaking Skill............................................................................. 12
2. Communicative Competence...................................................... 13
3. Communication Strategies.......................................................... 15
CHAPTER III : RESEARCH METHOD.................................................................. 21
ix
A. Type of the Study............................................................................... 21
B. Subject of the Study........................................................................... 21
C. Object of the Study............................................................................ 22
D. Place and Time the Study.................................................................. 22
E. Data and Sources of Data................................................................... 22
F. Technique of Collecting Data............................................................ 23
G. Techniques of Analyzing Data........................................................... 23
H. Data Validity...................................................................................... 24
CHAPTER IV : RESEARCH FINDING AND DISCUSSION................................ 25
A. Research Finding............................................................................... 25
1. Type of Communication Strategies Used by Students............... 25
2. Frequency of Communication Strategies..................................... 32
3. Dominant Type of Communication Strategies............................ 32
B. Discussion of the Finding.................................................................. 33
CHAPTER V : CONCLUSION, PEDAGOGICAL IMPLICATION, AND
SUGGESTION................................................................................... 40
A. Conclusion......................................................................................... 40
B. Pedagogical Implication..................................................................... 41
C. Suggestion.......................................................................................... 42
BIBLIOGRAPHY
APPENDIX
x
Abstrak
Dara Puspitasari, A320130083. An Analysis of Communication Strategies Used
by English Tutorial Program Students in Speaking Class: Naturalistic Study at
Departement of Accounting Education at hammadiyah University of Surakarta.
Skripsi Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan, Universitas Muhammadiyah
Surakarta. Maret, 2017.
Penelitian ini mendeskripsikan tentang strategi komunikasi yang digunakan
oleh mahasiswa English Tutorial Program di kelas speaking dari Departemen
Akutansi di Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta. Penelitian ini mendeskripsikan 3
komponen, (1) Tipe
strategi komunikasi yang digunakan oleh maha siswa, (2)
Frekuensi tipe strategi komunikasi, (3) Dominan
strategi komunikasi yang
digunakan oleh mahasiswa. Data dalam penelian ini adalah strategi komunikasi
yang digunakan oleh mahasiswa English Tutorial Program di kelas speaking dari
Departemen Akutansi di Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta.
menggunakan 3 kelompok
Peneliti
English Tutorial Program, dengan jumlah 30 siswa
sebagai subjek. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode deskriptif kualitatif. Penulis
meneliti data menggunakan taksonomi dari Dornyei. Penulis menemukan 6 subtipe
dari 2 tipe taksonomi dari Dornyei. Tipe yang paling dominan digunakan oleh
mahasiswa adalah Stalling or Time Gaining dengan 56,49%, Code Switching,
Appeal For Help, Message Abandonment, Literal Translation, dan yang paling jarang
digunakan yaitu Non-Linguistic Signals dengan 1,67%.
Hal ini dapat ditarik
kesimpulan bahwa strategi komunikasi dibutuhkan oleh siswa dan dapat digunakan
sebagai materi di kelas berbicara. Sehingga siswa dapat bekomunikasi secara lancar.
Kata Kunci : Berbicara, Strategi Komunikasi
xi
Abstract
Dara Puspitasari, A320130083. An Analysis of Communication Strategies Used
by English Tutorial Program Students in Speaking Class: Naturalistic Study at
Departement of Accounting Education at hammadiyah University of Surakarta.
Research Paper. School of Teacher Training and Education Muhammadiyah
University of Surakarta. March, 2017.
This study decribed communication strategies used by English Tutorial
Program students in speaking class: naturalistic study at Accounting Education
Departement at Muhammadiyah University of Surakarta. This study described three
components, (1) The type of communication strategies used by students, (2)
Frequency the type of communication strategies, (3) The dominant communication
strategies used by students. The data of this study is communication strategies used
by English Tutorial Pogram students in speaking class: naturalistic study at
Accounting Departement at Muhhamadiyah University of Surakarta. Researcher uses
3 groups of English Tutorial Program with 30 students as a subject. This study used
descriptif kualitatif. Researcher analysis uses Dornyei’s Taxonomy. The researcher
found 2 types with six subtypes of Dornye’s Taxonomy. The dominant type used by
students is Stalling or Time Gaining with 56,49%, Code Switching, Appeal For Help,
Message Abandonment, Literal Translation, and the rarely type used by students is
Non-Linguistic Signals with 1,67%. It is can conclude that communication strategy
takes students and can be used as materials in speaking class. So that students can
communicate fluently.
Keyword : Speaking, Communication Strategies
xii