UNFAITHFULNESS OF ELIDA WANGEL REFLECTED AT HENRIK IBSEN’S THE LADY FROM THE SEA (1888): Unfaithfulness of Elida Wangel Reflected at Henrik Ibsen’s The Lady From The Sea 1888 a Psychoanalytic Approach.

UNFAITHFULNESS OF ELIDA WANGEL REFLECTED AT
HENRIK IBSEN’S THE LADY FROM THE SEA (1888):
A PSYCHOANALYTIC APPROACH

RESEARCH PAPER

Submitted as a Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements
for Getting Bachelor Degree of Education
in English Derpartment

by
ERLANGGA DJATI
A320110044

SCHOOL OF TEACHER TRAINING AND EDUCATION
MUHAMMADIYAH UNIVERSITY OF SURAKARTA
2016
i

APPROVAL


UNFAITHFULNESS OF ELIDA WANGEL REFLECTED AT
HENRIK IBSEN’S THE LADY FROM THE SEA (1888):
A PSYCHOANALYTIC APPROACH

RESEARCH PAPER

by
ERLANGGA DJATI
A320110044

Approved to be Examined by the
Consultant Team

First Consultant

Second Consultant

(Dr. Phil. Dewi Chandraningrum, M. Ed)

(Siti Fatimah, S.Pd., M.Hum.)


NIK. 772

NIK. 850
ii

ACCEPTANCE

UNFAITHFULNESS OF ELIDA WANGEL REFLECTED AT
HENRIK IBSEN’S THE LADY FROM THE SEA (1888):
A PSYCHOANALYTIC APPROACH

by
ERLANGGA DJATI
A320110044

Accepted by the Board of Examiner
School of Teacher Training and Education
Muhammadiyah University of Surakarta


Team of Examiner:
1. Dr. Phil. Dewi Chandraningrum, M. Ed.

(

)

(

)

(

)

(First Examiner)
2. Siti Fatimah, S.Pd., M.Hum.
(Second Examiner)
3. Dr. Abdillah Nugroho, M.Hum.
(Third Examiner)


Surakarta, 8 Maret 2016
Muhammadiyah University of Surakarta
School of Teacher Training and Education
Dean,

Prof. Dr. Harun Joko Prayitno, M. Hum.
NIP. 19650428B199303 1001
iii

ABSTRACT

ERLANGGA DJATI. A320110044. UNFAITHFULNESS OF ELIDA WANGEL
REFLECTED AT HENRIK IBSEN’S THE LADY FROM SEA (1888): A
PSYCHOANALYTIC APPROACH. Research Paper.School of Teacher Training and
Education, Muhammadiyah University of Surakarta. february, 2016.
The problem of this study is “How is the the personality of Ellida Wabgel
reflected in Henrik Ibsen’s Lady from the sea play?”. The objectives of this study are to
analyze Lady from the sea based on Structural analysis and the to analyze Lady from the
sea play based on Psychoanalytic perspective.

The researcher employs qualitative method. The writer uses two data sources:
primary and secondary. The primary data source is the play itself. The secondary data
sources are from other sources such as essay, articles, biography of Henrik

Ibsen,

internet and other relevant information. The method of data collection is library research
and the technique of data collection is descriptive technique.
Based on the anaylisis, the researcher get some conclusion they are:
1) Ellida is a captive to her own mental illusion with mental fantasies
regarding a former love.
2) Ellida also becomes obsessed with the sea.
Ellida is a strong-willing and free character. She considers that every decisions
of her live should be based on her own free will. Ellida Wangel has being mentally
unfaithful toward her husband. The stranger man, the man who previously had a
relationship with Ellida, has a mysterious power against Ellida and she manifests it
toward her continuous affection of the sea. Despite she is never physically cheating with
the stranger, she always dreams that she is belong to him along with the sea.
Keywords: Psychoanalytic, Lady from the sea, Infidelity, Unfaithfulness


v

ABSTRACT

ERLANGGA
REFLECTED

DJATI.
AT

A320110044.
HENRIK

UNFAITHFULNESS

IBSEN’S

THE

LADY


OF
FROM

ELIDA
SEA

WANGEL
(1888):

A

PSYCHOANALYTIC APPROACH. Research Paper. School of Teacher Training and
Education, Muhammadiyah University of Surakarta. february, 2016.

Masalah penelitian ini adalah "Bagaimana kepribadian Ellida Wabgel tercermin dalam
Henrik Ibsen Lady dari laut bermain?". Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk menganalisis
Lady dari laut berdasarkan analisis struktural dan untuk menganalisis Lady dari bermain laut
berdasarkan perspektif psikoanalitik.
Peneliti menggunakan metode kualitatif. penulis menggunakan dua sumber data: primer

dan sekunder. Sumber data primer adalah bermain sendiri. Sumber data sekunder berasal dari
sumber lain seperti esai, artikel, biografi Henrik Ibsen, internet dan informasi terkait lainnya.
Metode pengumpulan data adalah penelitian pustaka dan teknik pengumpulan data adalah teknik
deskriptif.
Berdasarkan anaylisis itu, peneliti mendapatkan beberapa kesimpulan mereka:
1) Ellida adalah tawanan ilusi mentalnya sendiri dengan fantasi mental yang mengenai seorang
mantan cinta.
2) Ellida juga menjadi terobsesi dengan laut.
Ellida adalah karakter yang kuat-bersedia dan bebas. Dia menganggap bahwa setiap
keputusan hidup nya harus didasarkan pada kehendaknya sendiri. Ellida Wangel telah tidak setia
mental terhadap suaminya. Orang asing man, orang yang sebelumnya memiliki hubungan
dengan Ellida, memiliki kekuatan misterius terhadap Ellida dan dia memanifestasikan ke arah
kasih sayang yang terus menerus nya laut. Meskipun ia tidak pernah secara fisik kecurangan
dengan orang asing itu, dia selalu mimpi bahwa dia milik dia bersama dengan laut.

Kata kunci: psikoanalitik, Lady dari laut, Perselingkuhan, Tidak setia

MOTTO

Hai orang-orang mukmin, jika kamu menolong (agama) Allah, niscaya Dia akan

menolongmu dan meneguhkan kedudukanmu.
(QS: Muhammad Ayat: 7)
Sesungguhnya Allah memberikan nikmat-Nya kepada hamba-hamba-Nya sesuai
dengan kemampuan-Nya dan mewajibkan mereka bersyukur sesuai dengan
kemampuan mereka.
(Ali bin Abi Tholib)
Will nothing beyond your capacity; there is a wicked falseness who will beyond their
capacity .
(Nietzsche)
Nothing is impossible, the word itself says 'I'm possible'!
(Audrey Hepburn)
Too much love will kill you by you must die on your love.

(the researcher)

vi

DEDICATION
These reseach will be dedicated to:



Allah SWT, the Supreme Being; Praise to Allah SWT



Truly beloved mother and father



All my cheerful brothers, sisters’nephews and nieces



All my friends.



My consultants and lecturers, and




To one unnamed; whose name someday shall be named to dedicates,
together with this little work; the whole production of the writer from
the very beginning.

vii

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
Assalamu’alaikumWr. Wb.
Alkhamdulillahirobbil’alamin. All praises belong to Allah SWT to his blessing and
mercies

given

to

the

researcher,

He

can

complete

her

research

paper

UNFAITHFULNESS OF ELIDA WANGEL REFLECTED AT HENRIK IBSEN’S
THE SEA LADY FROM THE SEA (1888): A PSYCHOANALYTIC APPROACH.
In conducting this research, the researcher got some helps from many people. On this best
occasion, the researcher would like to express her deepest gratitude and appreciation to
the following people:
1.

Prof. Dr. Harun Joko Prayitno, M. Hum., Dean of Scholl of Teacher Training and
Education Muhammadiyah University of Surakarta,

2.

Mauly Halwat Hikmat, Ph. D, Head of English Department Muhammadiyah
University,

3.

Dr. Phil. Dewi Chandraningrum, M. Ed., the first consultant, and who as the
academic consultant has patiently guided the researcher in arranging this work,
provided time for consultant, and gave the researcher nice suggestion,

4.

Siti Fatimah, S.Pd., M.Hum., the second consultant who has been willing to guide,
correct, and encourage her from the beginning of writing until the end of it,

5.

All lecturers of English Department, for being good educators, guide, and mentor,

6.

His best gratitude for his beloved parents (Bapak Kantyono and Ibu Sri Wahyuni
Retnowati), thanks for ever over love, prayers, support (moral and material),
motivation, and everything during her life,

7.

His beloved brother, who have given love, care, prayers, and support. Thanks for
everything,

8.

His big family, who have given care, prayers, and support,

9.

His beloved friends Izzatul Yazidah Putri Ihsani, Rosyid Munandar, Nova Andri,
Ardika, Wahyu Julian, Septian Nugroho, Oktafiningrum, Sukma Aji, Wisnu
Tunggal,Widiyantoro, Panggih, Rosid Prayogi, etc. thank for your love, spirit,
motivation, suggestion, joke, and everything,
viii

TABLE OF CONTENT
page
COVER ........................................................................................................................ i
APPROVAL ................................................................................................................. ii
ACCEPTENCE ............................................................................................................ iii
TESTIMONY ............................................................................................................... iv
ABSTRACT ................................................................................................................. v
MOTTO........................................................................................................................ vi
DEDICATION ............................................................................................................. vii
ACKNOWLEDGMENT .............................................................................................. viii
TABLE OF CONTENT ............................................................................................... x
CHAPTER I : INTRODUCTION ............................................................................. 1
A. Background of the Study.................. ............................................. 1
B. Literature Review .......................................................................... 6
C. Problem of Statement….. .............................................................. 10
D. Objective of the Study ................................................................... 10
E. Benefit of the Study…….. ............................................................. 10
F. Research Method ........................................................................... 11
G. Paper Organizer ............................................................................. 13
CHAPTER II : UNDERLYING THEORY ............................................................... 14
A. Notion of Psychoanalysis..................................... ....................... 14
B. Structure of Personality ............................................................... 15
1. The Id ................................................................................... 15
2. The Ego ................................................................................ 16
3. Superego............................................................................... 17
x

4. Ego Defense Mechanism ..................................................... 17
5. Structural Elements of Drama .............................................. 22

C. Notion of infidelity...................................................................... 24
D. Theoretical Application ............................................................... 26
CHAPTER III : STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS ........................................................... 27
A. The Structural Element of the Play .............................................. 27

1. Character and Characterization ............................................ 27
2. Setting .......................................................................................... 37
3. Plot ............................................................................................... 41
4. Theme .......................................................................................... 52
5. Style ............................................................................................ 54
6. Technical Element ....................................................................... 57
B. Discussion ................................................................................... 62
CHAPTER IV : Psychoanalytic Analysis ................................................................... 68
A. Ellida Wangel’s Structure Of Personality ................................... 68
1. The Id ................................................................................... 68
2. The Ego ................................................................................ 72
3. Superego............................................................................... 74
B. Ego Defense Mechanism............................................................. 75
1. Repression ............................................................................ 76
2. Denial ................................................................................... 78
3. Rationalization ..................................................................... 79
4. Regression ............................................................................ 81
5. Reaction Formation .............................................................. 82
6. Undoing ................................................................................ 83
C. Identify Analysis of Elida Wangel .............................................. 84
D. Discussion ................................................................................... 87
CHAPTER V : CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTION ............................................ 91
A. Conclusion .................................................................................. 91
xi

B. Suggestion ................................................................................... 92
C. Pedagogical Implication .............................................................. 92
BIBLIOGRAPHY
VIRTUAL REFERENCE

xii