6
From the data analysis, the researcher also finds that mechanism is the second problem faced by the students in writing recount text. This research
shows that the students makes 30,83 wrong sentences in mechanism when writing recount text with 30 as its smallest score. It means that mechanism
becomes the problem faced by students in writing recount text beside grammar. So, beside grammar, the teacher should teach mechanism more to
the students. They should also write the text carefully to avoid their problem in mastering of mechanism.
From the discussion of the research finding, the researcher concludes that the result of research on students’ ability in writing recount text has five
aspects in writing. There are content, organization, diction, grammar, and mechanism. This research shows that the students master more about content,
organization, and diction. The researcher also finds that grammar and mechanism become the problems for the students in writing recount text.
D. Conclusion
Based on the research finding, the writer draws conclusion based on the students’ works in writing recount text at the eight grade of SMP N 2
Colomadu. The researcher finds that students’ ability in writing recount text at the eight grade of SMP N 2 Colomadu is fair. It can be found by analyzing the
students’ works based on five aspects of writing; content, organization, vocabulary, grammar, and mechanism. The students’ ability in writing recount
text at the eight grade students of SMP N 2 Colomadu are 14 students who belong to the good category 41,18, 19 students who belong to the fair
category 55,88, 1 student who belongs to the poor category 2,94, and there is not student who belongs to very good or very poor category.
The researcher also finds the aspects of writing recount text that become the problems faced by the students are grammar and mechanism,
where grammar is the main problem with the highest mistakes made by the students.
7
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Anderson, Mark and Anderson Kathy. 1997. Text Types in English. Australia: Macmillan.
Brown, H.D. 2007. Language Assessment: Principles and Classroom Practices. New York: Longman.
Fauziati, Endang. 2010. Teaching English as a Foreign Language TEFL. Surakarta: PT. Era Pustaka.
Fauziati, Endang, et al. 2010. Material Enrichment for English Teacher. Surakarta: Badan Penerbit FKIP-UMS
Kirby, Dawn Latta and Crovitz, Darren. 2013. Inside Out: Strategies for Teaching Writing. USA: Greenwood Publishing Group.
Kurniawati, Dian Sari. 2013. Students’ Capability in Writing Recount Text of the First Year Students in SMA N 1 Cepogo, Boyolali in 20112012
Academic Year. Surakarta: Muhammadiyah University.
Linse, T. Caroline. 2005. Practical Language Teaching: Young Learners. North America: McGraw-Hill
Magfur, Albi. 2012. Students’ Capabiity in Answering Multiple Choice Question of Reading Passage at Ninth Grade of SMP Muhammadiyah 4 Surakarta
in 20111012 Academic Year. Surakarta: Muhammadiyah University.
Nunan, David. 2000. Language Teaching Methodology: A Textbook for Teacher. Malaysia: Longman.
Susanto, Danang. 2011. Students’ Capability in Understanding Written Texts of the Second Year Students of RSBI Class at SMP N 1 Wonogiri.
Surakarta: Muhammadiyah University.
8
VIRTUAL REVERENCES
Cureton, Melissa. 2007. Writing: Genre and Text Types. Retrived from http:www.inetword.commc10617316Grammar20Website_filespag
e0006.htm.
