Appendices
1. The Average Score in the Experimental and Control Groups with its category a. Experimental Group X1
No Students’ code
Score and Category Average score
of pre-test Category
Average score of Post test
Category 1
S-1 38.5
Very poor 46.5
Very poor
2 S-2
37 Very poor
45.5 Very poor
3 S-3
46 Very poor
48.5 Very poor
4 S-4
39.5 Very poor
41 Very poor
5 S-5
46 Very poor
54 Poor
6 S-6
41.5 Very poor
45 Very poor
7 S-7
53 Poor
54 Poor
8
S-8 41.5
Very poor 49
Very poor
9 S-9
43 Very poor
50 Very poor
10
S-10 44.5
Very poor 57
Poor
11 S-11
38 Very poor
44.5 Very poor
12
S-12 43.5
Very poor 51
Poor
13 S-13
45 Very poor
59 Poor
14
S-14 49.5
Very poor 66.5
Fair
15 S-15
45.5 Very poor
55 Poor
16
S-16 46
Very poor 58.5
Poor
17 S-17
42 Very poor
55 Poor
18
S-18 44.5
Very poor 60.5
Fair
19 S-19
48.5 Very poor
48.5 Very poor
20
S-20 44.5
Very poor 49
Very poor
21 S-21
35.5 Very poor
38.5 Very poor
b. Control Group X2
No Students’ code
Score and Category Average score
of pre-test Category
Average score of post test
Category 1
S-1 41.5
Very poor 40
Very poor
2
S-2 39
Very poor 38
Very poor
3 S-3
39.5 Very poor
41 Very poor
4 S-4
42 Very poor
42 Very poor
5 S-5
37.5 Very poor
38 Very poor
6 S-6
44.5 Very poor
44 Very poor
7 S-7
42.5 Very poor
42 Very poor
8 S-8
43 Very poor
47.5 Very poor
9 S-9
40 Very poor
40 Very poor
10 S-10
42.5 Very poor
39.5 Very poor
11
S-11 46
Very poor 42
Very poor
12 S-12
42 Very poor
44 Very poor
13
S-13 47
Very poor 44.5
Very poor
14 S-14
43 Very poor
44 Very poor
15
S-15 45.5
Very poor 44
Very poor
16 S-16
39 Very poor
38 Very poor
17
S-17 41
Very poor 40
Very poor
18 S-18
44.5 Very poor
41.5 Very poor
19
S-19 37.5
Very poor 35.5
Very poor
20 S-20
41 Very poor
42.5 Very poor
21
S-21 38.5
Very poor 42
Very poor
ESL COMPOSITION PROFILE
STUDENT DATE
TOPIC
30-27 EXCELLENT TO VERY GOOD: knowledgeable, substantive, thorough
development of thesis, relevant to assigned topic 26-21
GOOD TO AVERAGE: some knowledge of subject, adequate range, limited development of thesis, mostly relevant to topic, but lacks detail
21-17 FAIR TO POOR: limited knowledge of subject, little substance, inade-
quate development of topic 16-13
VERY POOR: does not show knowledge of subject, non-substantive, not pertinent . OR not enough to evaluate
SCORE LEVEL
CRITERIA
20-18 EXCELLENT TO VERY GOOD: fluent expression, ideas clearly stated
Supported, succinct, well-organized, logical sequencing, cohesive 17-14
GOOD TO AVERAGE: somewhat choppy, loosely organized but main ideas stand out, limited support, logical but incomplete sequencing
13-10 FAIR TO POOR: non-fluent, ideas confused or disconnected, lacks
Logical sequencing and development 9-7
VERY POOR: does not communicate . no organization . OR not enough to evaluate
COMMENTS
20-18 EXCELLENT TO VERY GOOD: sophisticated range, effective word
idiom choice and usage, word form mastery, appropriate register 17-14
GOOD TO AVERAGE: adequate range, occasional errors of wordidiom form, choice, usage but meaning not obscured
13-10 FAIR TO POOR: limited range, frequent errors of wordidiom form,
choice, usage, meaning confused or obscured 9-7
VERY POOR: essentially translation, little knowledge of English vocabu- lary, idioms, word form . OR not enough to evaluate
25-22 EXCELLENT TO VERY GOOD: effective complex constructions . few
errors of agreement, tense, number, word orderfunction, articles, pro- nouns, prepositions
21-18 GOOD TO AVERAGE: effective but simple constructions . minor pro-
blems in complex constructions . several errors of agreement, tense, number, word orderfunction, articles, pronouns, prepositions but
meaning seldom obscured 17-11
FAIR TO POOR: major problems in simplecomplex constructions . frequent errors of negation, agreement, tense, number, word order
function, articles, pronouns, prepositions andor fragments, run-ons, deletions . meaning confused or obscured
10-5 VERY POOR: virtually no mastery of sentence construction rules . dom-
inated by errors . does not communicate . OR not enough to evaluate
5 EXCELLENT TO VERY GOOD: demonstrates mastery of conventions
. few errors of spelling, punctuation, capitalization, paragraphing 4
GOOD TO AVERAGE: occasional errors of spelling, punctuation, capitali- zation, paragraphing but meaning not obscured
3 FAIR TO POOR: frequent errors of spelling, punctuation, capitalization,
Paragraphing, poor handwriting, meaning confused or obscured 2
VERY POOR: no mastery of conventions, dominated by errors of spell- ing, punctuation, capitalization, paragraphing, handwriting illegible
. OR not enough to evaluate
TOTAL SCORE READER
COMMENTS
CON TE
N T
ORGAN IZA
TION
VOCA BULAR
Y
LAN GUA
GE US E
M ECHA
N ICS
2. Analytic scoring of writing