TheImpactsof GrammaticalError Conclusions Grammatical Errors found In Student Of English department’s Essay

80 CHAPTERV CONCLUSIONSANDSUGGESTIONS

5.1. Conclusions

1. In this thesis, there are nine types of Grammatical Errors namely Subject-VerbAgreement, Singular Plural, ToInfinitive, PassiveVoice, FormsofAdjective,Redudancy,Preposition,ParallelStructure and Mispaced Wordsmadeinthedatas. 2.Subject-VerbAgreementhas30itemsor28.84,andthistypeisthe mostdominantfoundintheessayswhichmadegrammatical error. Preposition has 23 items or 22.11, Passive Voice has 14 items or 13.46,SingularPluralhas10itemsor9.61,ToInfinitivehas9items or8.65,FormsofAdjectivehas5itemsor4.80,Redundancyhas5 items or4.80,MissplacedWordhas5 items or4.80, and thelast, ParallelismStructurehas3 datasor 2.88. 3.Essayiswrittenbecausetheywanttopourouteverything theywillingly sharetoothers.Itmeansthatthey wouldliketorevealsomethinginorder thatothers cangetbeneficialpoints fromit.Unluckily, itwillneverbe accomplishedif theregulationsofsentencestructureisnot applied.These aretheimpactsthatcanbeexperienced by readerifgrammaticalerror exists: a. Grammatical error will change the meaning. b. Grammatical errorcan cause intended meaningdistorted. 8 c. Grammatical errorcausesreadersdifficultto understand. d. Grammaticalerrorcausesthesentenceseemawkwardanddoesnotmake sense. e. Grammaticalerrormakesthemeaningishighlyunlikelyorcompletely ridiculous.

5.2. Suggestions

Fromtheanalysisandtheconclusionsabove,thewriterwouldlike to proposethefollowingsuggestionsforreaderswhoconcernwiththestudy of EnglishLiterature. First, Englishas an international language. It isimportant to master English because itwillhelp brighten thefutureof readers. Second,forthosewhoareinterestedinstudyingEnglish,theycanstudy further aboutgrammar inEnglish which supportsthatmatter. Finally,thewriterhopesthatthisthesiscanbebeneficialwriting forthe readerswholikespeaking andwritingEngishinordertominimizeandto anticipate themistake intheir speech andwritten asaresultof grammatical. 82 REFERENCES Alwasilah, Chaedar. 1985. SosiologiBahasa. Bandung :Angkasa. Allan,Keith. 1986. LinguisticMeaning 2 vols.London:Routledge. Alo, M. 1998. Style inLanguage and Communication. Port-Harcourt:Aeddy Link. Anderson,Stephen.2012. Languages:AVeryShortIntroduction.Oxford:Oxford UniversityPress. Angelillo, Janet. 2001. GrammarStudy. New York:Scholastic. Antilla,R.1972. AnIntroductiontoHistoricalandComparativeLinguistics. NewYork:MacMillan PublishingCo., Inc. Arikunto, S. 2010. Prosedur PenelitianSuatu Pendekatan Praktek. Jakarta: RinekaCipta. Azar,BettySchramfer.1999.UnderstandingandUsingEnglishGrammar.New York:Pearson Education. Azwar, Saifuddin. 1997. MetodePenelitian. Yogyakarta:PustakaPelajar Offset. Bloomfield,Leonard. 1933. Language. NewYork:Hoit, RinehartWinston,Inc. Bungin, Burhan. 2001. Metodologi Penelitian Sosial. Surabaya: Airlangg UniversityPress. Chomsky,Noam.1971.AspectsoftheTheoryofSyntax.Massachusetts:THE M.I.T. PRESS De Saussure, Ferdinand. 1986. Course inGeneral Linguistics. New York: McGrawHill.