Various Business Contract Templates in Telecommunication Industry

VARIOUS BUSINESS CONTRACT TEMPLATES

  

Job Training Report in Perusahaan PT Industri Telekomunikasi Indonesia

  Submitted to fulfill one of the course requirements ACHMAD BAGOES ARTHA

  63713700

  

ENGLISH DEPARTMENT

FACULTY OF LETTERS

  

INDONESIA COMPUTER UNIVERSITY

BANDUNG

2014

  CURRICULUM VITAE 1. Student Profile Name : Achmad Bagoes Artha K.

  Address : Gg. Pelindung Hewan 1 No. 4, Bandung

  th

  Place and date of birth : Bandung, June 9 , 1986 Sex : Male Religion : Islam E-Mail : [email protected] 2.

   Education Background a. Formal Education

  No Year Institution 1 1991-1992 TK Assalaam 2 1992-1998 SD Assalaam 1 3 1998-2001 SLTPN 33 Bandung 4 2001-2004 SMUN 12 Bandung 5 2004-2012 Universitas Komputer Indonesia (on leave) 6 2013-Now Universitas Komputer Indonesia

  b. Informal Education

  No Year Institution 1 2005 Workshop 3D Animation (certified) 2 2005 Seminar Penulisan Abstrak dalam Bahasa Inggris

  (certified) 3 2006-2007 Workshop on Copy Writing (certified) 4 2009 Copy Writing Seminar and Workshop (certified) 5 2010 Technology and Information National Seminar

  (certified) 6 2014 Postcolonialism Seminar (certified) 7 2014 Seminar Menyambut Bulan Suci Ramadhan

  (certified) 8 2014 Talkshow You write what you think (certified)

  c. Competency 1.

   Proficient in english; 2. Adept at using computer and internet; 3. Willing to learn; 4. Acceptance of different values, beliefs, and communication habit; 5. Able work in team.

  d. Organizational and work experiences.

  No Year Experiences 1 1998 Pasus of PKS at SMPN 33 Bandung

  2 2005 Logistic crew of HIMA SAIS ELITE 05 3 2005 Comitee of “Seminar abstrak dalam Bahasa

  Inggris”

  4 2006 General Leader of HIMA SAIS 5 2006 Comitee of HIMA SAIS ELITE 06 6 2007 Comitee of Kegiatan Evaluasi Belajar Mengajar

  Jurusan Sastra Inggris dan Sastra Jepang Tahun Akademik 2005/2006.

  

CONTENTS

  ABSTRACT iv

  ABSTRAK v

  ACKNOWLEDGEMENT vi

  CONTENTS vii

  CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION

  1.1 Background to the Topic

  1

  1.2 Scope

  2

  1.3 Objectives

  2

  1.4 Significance to Knowledge

  2

  1.5 Framework of the Theories

  3

  1.6 Research Method

  3 CHAPTER II THE DESCRIPTION OF THE TOPIC

  2.1 Definition of Contract

  4

  2.2 Data Analysis

  4

  2.2.1 Head of Contract

  5

  2.2.2 Compareo

  6

  2.2.3 Praemisse

  9

  2.2.4 Definition

  12

  2.2.5 Main Body

  15

  2.2.6 Closure

  19

  2.2.7 Amendments

  23 CHAPTER III CONCLUSIONS AND SUGGESTIONS

  3.1 Conclusions

  25

  3.2 Suggestions

  26 REFERENCES

  27 APPENDICES

  28 CURRICULUM VITAE

  41 OUTLINES

  44

  

REFERENCES

Arifin, E. Zaenal. 1989. Penggunaan Bahasa Indonesia dalam Surat Dinas.

  Jakarta: MSP. Bratawidjaja, Thomas. 1995. Surat Bisnis Modern. Cetakan 8. Jakarta: Gramedia.

  Rahardi, R. Kunjana. 2007. Practical English Business Correspondence. Yogyakarta: Kanisius Printing and Publishing House.

  Sukandar, Dadang. 2011. Membuat Surat Perjanjian. Yogyakarta: ANDI OFFSET. Syaifuddin, Muhammad. 2012. Hukum Kontrak. Bandung: Mandar Maju.

  ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

  The writer would like to express the deepest gratitude and appreciation to: 1.

  Allah SWT the Almighty who blessed me with a good health and opportunity to complete my job training.

  2. Dr. Juanda, as the advisor who help me greatly in the process of finishing this report.

  3. Muhammad Rayhan Bustam, S.S., M.Hum. as the job training coordinator who help guiding me in the job training process.

  4. Mr. Itot Wiharto as my field advisor in PT INTI who also helped and teaches me about many things.

  5. Mr. Kasnanta, for guiding me as job trainee in PT INTI.

  6. My family who keep supporting me.

  7. My junior friends who also in the same session of job training. The writer realized that this research is imperfect and need improvement. Hopefully this research gives benefits for the readers and the writer in the future.

  Bandung, November 2014 The writer

  CHAPTER

  I INTRODUCION

1.1 Background to the Topic

  As telecommunication company, PT INTI is dealing with various other companies in a form of business agreement. The most important document to uphold the agreement between the two parties is contract. All kind of detail of the agreement from: by and between who the contract is made, the scope of work, what kind service/deal, the price of work, etc. are covered. Like any other document, contract need to be composed correctly to be acceptable.

  However, the acceptable template of contract is varying from one to another, depending entirely on the company (and its country origin).

  The writer managed to obtain permission to copy the safe part of some of the business contracts, which have different template since each of them coming from different company located in different country. Thus, the writer would like to discuss the template of contract while taking reference to general template of business contract. This is important since contract determine the agreement and it’s protected by law, any error in contract may cause harm to one or both company tied in the contract in one way to another.

  1.2 Scope

  Problems of the recent study are formulated by comparing between the copy of contracts, using the Hukum Kontrak by DR. Muhammad Syaifuddin, SH., M.Hum. and Membuat Surat Perjanjian by Dadang Sukandar as the reference, and describing each part or clauses of the contract.

  1.3 Objectives

  The Objective of this study is to show the various and different acceptable templates of contract in PT INTI.

  1.4 Significance to Knowledge

  This study is important as it will show us the various templates, while it’s varies from one to another, that acceptable according to law and general template of business contract from Membuat Surat Perjanjian book written by Dadang Sukandar and Hukum Kontrak by DR. Muhammad Syaifuddin, SH., M.Hum. as One may question which one is canon form when they try to write a contract.

  1.5 Framework of the Theories

  The writer using Hukum Kontrak as the reference to see the acceptable and the anatomy of contract according to the law and Membuat Surat Perjanjian as the reference of general business contract template which will be compared with the data sample the writer collected.

  1.6 Research Method

  To gather the necessary data, the writer use book study and data collecting by copying the allowed/safe part of contracts while on job training in PT INTI that located at Jalan Mochammad Toha no 77 Bandung from August 25th to September 12th, 2014 in working hour from 07.30 AM until 12.00 PM. The writer then tried to compare the various templates of the collected contracts and the reference while describing each part of the contract according to the theory form Hukum Kontrak.

CHAPTER II THE DESCRIPTION OF THE TOPIC

2.1 Definition of Contract

  According to Steven L Emanuel on Hukum Kontrak by DR. Muhammad Syaifuddin, SH., M.Hum. contract can be define as: “an agreement that law

  

will enforce in some way. A contract must contain at least on promise, i.e. a

commitment to do something in the future” (Emanuel on Syaifuddin, 2012:

  16) Furthermore, he explained that:

  

The term contract is often used to refer to a written document which

embodies an agreement. But for legal purpose, an agreement may be

binding and enforceable contract in most circumstances even though

it is oral” (Emanuel on Syaifuddin, 2012:16)

  From the quote above, it can be understood that contract is a written document pertaining of an agreement.

2.2 Data Analysis

  According to “ketentuan umum” dalam pasal 38 UU No. 30 Tahun 2004

1. Awal Akta atau Kepala Akta/ head of contract 2.

   Badan Akta/ main body 3. Akhir atau penutup/ Closure

  However according to Hukum Kontrak by DR. Muhammad Syaifuddin, SH., M.Hum. the anatomy or template is then improvised, while still based on

Pasal 38 UU No. 30 Tahun 2004, into: 1. Kepala Akta/Head of contract/opening 2. Komparisi/Compareo 3. Praemisse 4. Definisi/Definition 5. Isi Akta/Main body 6. Penutup Akta/Closure 7. Amandemen/Amendment

2.2.1 Head of Contract

  According to Pasal 38 ayat (2) UU No. 30 Tahun 2004 the head of contract consist of title, number, hour, day, month and year of the contract, and also the position and along with full name of the notary.

  In the contract between NEC and PT Inti the title of the contract is

  

PERJANJIAN KERJASAMA PENGADAAN JASA SPAREPART

MANAGEMENT SERVICE ANTARA PT NEC INDONESIA DENGAN

PERUSAHAAN PERSEROAN (PERSERO) PT INDUSRI TELEKOMUNIKASI

  INDONESIA. The number of contract is filled, however since it

  ’s considered confidential part, it cannot be published. The rest head of contract is fulfilled in fashion of: Pada hari ini, Rabu, tanggal Sembilan belas, bulan Juni, tahun dua ribu tiga belas bertempat di Jakarta….

  While the contract between Huawei and PT Inti entitled LOGISTIC SERVICE PROVIDER AGREEMENT, the head of contract is as following: THIS LOGISTIC SE

  RVICE PROVIDER AGREEMENT (this “Agreement”)

  st

  is made on this 1 d ay of February 2013 (the “Effective Date”).

  Based on the data above we can see that only contract between NEC and PT Inti that used contract number and detail of day and date, and the city where the contract was made, while the contract of Huawei and PT Inti does not include contract number and lack of day and place, only the date of the contract.

2.2.2 Compareo

  Next part is Compareo. Compareo can be defined as: “Bagian dari sebuah akta yang berupa deskripsi tentang kapasitas

  

comparant, yaitu orang yang menghadap pada atau hadir di hadapan pejabat

umum, sehingga dapat diketahui kedudukan, kewenangan, dan kecakapan

comparant dalam atau untuk melakukan perbuatan hukum sebagaimana

termuat dalam akta yang bersangkutan” (Soepratigna on Syaifuddin, 201:,

182)

  According to Sukandar, compareo can be defined as both parties involved in contract or contract law subject.

  “Subjek hukum kontrak merupakan PIHAK

PERTAMA dan PIHAK KEDUA (komparisi) yang saling berjanji, yang

biasanya secara bersama sama disebut PARA PIHAK” (Soekandar:2011, 44)

  Soekandar also explained that the identity of the comparant must be as detail as possible, which at least consist of:

  1. Name (The name of the representative/the law subject/ or the company)

2. Occupation (The occupation of the law subject/ company) 3.

   Address (The address of the law subject/company) 4.

   ID card no (The number of law subject’s ID card or KTP) 5. The subject is representing/on behalf of who/what company 6. Deciding on what both parties should be called or referred in the contract.

  However if one or both parties are company (e.g. limited liability company) then the company will stand alone as a lawful company. The one who sign the contract is arranged by undang-undang, e.g. Director is allowed to sign since it’s arranged in “UU No.40 Tahun 2007 Tentang Perseroan

  Terbatas”

  The use of compareo in contract between Huawei and PT Inti can be seen in the following:

  BY AND BETWEEN: Perusahaan Perseroan (Persero) PT Industri Telekomunikasi Indonesia, a company duly incorporated under the laws of Indonesia and having its registered address at JL. Moch. Toha No.77 Kelurahan Cigereleng, Kecamatan Regol Kota Bandung, (hereinafter referred to as the “Service Provider”, which expression shall, where the contract permits, mean and includes its administrators and successors-in-interest) of the one part;

  AND PT Huawei Tech Investment a company incorporated in Indonesia and having

  th

  its registered office at BRI II building 20 floor, Jl Jend. Sudirman kav 44-46, Jakarta 10210, (hereinafter referred to as “Huawei” which expression shall, where the context permits, mean and includes its administrators and successors-in-interest) of the other part.

  The service provider and Huawei shall be collectively referred to as the “Parties” and individually referred to as the “Party” as the context may require:

  While the compareo in contract between NEC and PT Inti (content is modified by deleting some sensitive parts due to the parts in question are considered confidential) is:

I. PT NEC INDONESIA, berkedudukan di Summitmas I lt. 4, Jl.

  Jend. Sudirman Kav. 61-62, Jakarta 12190, dalam perbuatan hukum ini diwakili secara sah oleh Presiden Direktur, selanjutnya dalam perjanian ini disebut sebagai “NEC”.

II. PERUSAHAAN PERSEROAN (PERSERO) PT INDUSTRI

  TELEKOMUNIKASI INDONESIA, berkedudukan di Jl. Mohammad Toha nomor 77 Bandung, dalam perbuatan hukum ini diwakili secara sah oleh DIREKTUR UTAMA, selanjutnya dalam perjanjian ini disebut sebagai “INTI”,

  Untuk selanjutnya NEC dan INTI secara bersama- sama disebut “PARA PIHAK”, dan secara masing-masing disebut “Pihak”.

  From the data above we can see that both compareo are slightly different. The contract between Huawei and PT Inti only cover the subject, the address, and the reference call of the parties, while the contract between NEC and PT Inti cover almost all the elements mentioned in the theory.

2.2.3 Praemisse

  The third part is Praemisse, which can be defined as: “To say/said

  something as introduction” (Adisubroto, Prent on syaifuddin, 2012: 198)

  Praemisse can also be defined as part of contract which contain information about background and objectives of both parties.

  In Contract between NEC and PT Inti, praemisse (some parts are modified by deleting the sensitive parts) is used as follow:

  

…dengan terlebih dahulu mempertimbangkan hal-hal sebagai berikut :

a.

   Bahwa NEC berkehendak untuk mengadakan Pekerjaan Spare Part Management Service dengan cara Pemilihan Langsung; b.

   Bahwa INTI telah mengirimkan penawaran administrasi dan Teknis kepada NEC dan setelah diadakan evaluasi klarifikasi NEC menilai

  INTI mempunyai kemampuan, sumber daya dan kesanggupan untuk melaksanakan pekerjaan Spare Part Management Service sesuai dengan spesifikasi teknis yang dipersyaratkan NEC; c. Bahwa NEC telah menetapkan INTI sebagai pelaksana Pekerjaan Sparepart Management Service; d.

   Bahwa INTI telah menyatakan kesanggupan untuk melaksanakan Pekeraan Spare Part Management Service;

Berdasarkan pertimbangan tersebut di atas, PARA PIHAK sepakat untuk

mengikatkan diri satu sama lain untuk mengadakan Perjanjian Pengadaan

Jasa Spare Part Management Service, dengan ketentuan dan syarat-syarat

sebagai berikut :

  The use of praemisse in contract between Huawei and PT Inti can be seen as follow:

  Whereas: A.

   Huawei is the manufacturer and supplier of telecommunication

  equipment and services worldwide; B.

   The Service Provider possesses the requisite capabilities and

  experience in providing spare parts logistic services worldwide; C.

   Huawei desires to engage the Service Provider and Service Provider

  desires to accept the appointment as one of Huawei’s spare parts logistics services related to handling, delivery and distribution of spare parts including, but not restricted to, collection, purchase, storage, stock management, other handling, preparing for shipment, invoicing in respect of the goods as well as related documentation exchange in accordance with the terms and conditions set out herein.

  NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the promises, covenants hereinafter contained and to be performed by the Parties hereto, and for other good and valuable consideration the adequacy of which is hereby acknowledged by the Parties and the mutual benefits to be derived there from, the representations and warranties, covenants, conditions, and promises contained herein below and intending to be legally bound, the Parties hereby agree as follows:

  The data show us that there’s not much differences between the two praemise, and both contain background and objectives of the parties regarding

2.2.4 Definition

  Definition is the next part. According to Hukum Kontrak, definition is a part of contract that explained about/the meaning of the specific terms which are contained or used in the contract. It also explained that definition does not always exist in contract, depend on the complexity of contract material. That mean, if the contract made by the parties involved is simple enough, the definition is not necessary.

  The contract between Huawei and PT Inti is considered as simple contract by both parties, thus the definition part does not exist in the contract. While the contract between NEC and PT Inti make use of definition, to make it as detail as possible. The definition part of contract between NEX and PT Inti can be seen as followed:

PASAL 1 DEFINISI a.

   “Perjanjian” adalah perjanjian tertulis tentang Perjanjian Pengadaan Jasa Spare Part Management Service beserta lampiran-lampirannya termasuk perubahannya jika ada, yang telah disepakati PARA PIHAK dan mengatur hubungan hukum serta menegaskan ketentuan dan

  tentang Ketentuan-Ketentuan dan Syarat-Syarat Umum, dimana perubahan dari isi Perjanian ini hanya dapat dilakukan dalam bentuk amandemen. Ketentuan-ketentuan dan syarat-syarat Umum akan berlaku untuk semua Pekerjaan yang diberikan oleh NEC kepada INTI berdasarkan Perjanjian ini kecuali ada pengecualian yang diatur dalam masing masing Purchase Order.

  b.

  

“Purchase Order (PO)” adalah dokumen yang wajib diterbitkan oleh

NEC sebagai dasar pemesanan Pekerjaan dan/atau jasa-jasa dan/atau pekerjaan lainnya kepada INTI berdasarkan Pasal 5 Perjanjian ini yang mengatur kondisi khusus yang hanya berlaku untuk masing masing PO tersebut saja. Adapun kondisi-kondisi lain yang tidak diatur dalam PO maka yang berlaku adalah kondisi yang dicantumkan dalam Perjanian.

  c.

  

“Spare Part Management Service” adalah suatu sistem total solusi

dalam jasa penyimpanan, manajemen, pelaporan dan Pengangkutan atas Perangkat yang diserahkan dari NEC kepada INTI untuk dipergunakan NEC dengan pedoman pada Standard Operating Procedure dan Key Performance Indicator yang terdapat dalam lampiran 1 Perjanjian ini.

  d.

  

“Pekerjaan” adalah Penyediaan Jasa Spare Part Management Service

termasuk namun tidak terbatas atas jasa transportasi, pergudangan, pengiriman, pengepakan, penyediaan ruang muatan, dan/atau

  kepabeanan dalam negeri untuk angkutan multimoda dalam negeri sebagaimana ditetapkan dalam Perjanjian ini; e.

  

“Perangkat” adalah setiap barang-barang/produk-produk milik NEC

baik secara sendiri-sendiri atau bersama sama yang berupa perangkat radio microwave, dengan nama dan spesifikasi teknis sebagaimana tersebut pada Lampiran 4 yang merupakan objek Perjanjian yang diserahkan oleh NEC kepada INTI; f.

“Berita Acara Pemeriksaan dan Penerimaan Barang” adalah Berita

Acara yang menyatakan bahwa NEC atau INTI telah menyerahkan atau menerima barang bagus atau rusak dan dinyatakan oleh NEC atau INTI, Berita Acara ini diterbitkan oleh NEC atau UNTI dan ditandatangani bersama oleh NEC atau INTI.

  g.

  

“Spare Part (SPMS) Form” adalah Berita acara yang menyatakan

bahwa INTI atau END USER telah menyerahkan dan atau menerima barang bagus atau rusak dan dinyatakan oleh INTI atau END USER. Spare Part (SPMS) Form ditandatatangani oleh INTI atau END USER yang melakukan serah terima barang. Spare Part (SPMS) Form sebagaimana terlampir di Lampiran 7.

  h.

  

“END USER” adalah customer atau penerima jasa Spare Part

Management Service dari NEC berdasarkan Perjanian ini. i.

  

“Berita Acara Rekonsiliasi” adalah Berita Acara hasil perhitungan

nilai akhir pelaksanaan Pekeraan (kecuali pergudangan) untuk akhir triwulan berjalan yang telah diterima oleh NEC, Berita Acara ini

  ditandatangani oleh NEC c.q Senior Manager Customer Service dan

  INTI c.q Kepala Bagian Implementasi Proyek

  • – 1.; j.

   “Berita Acara Serah Terima (BAST)” adalah dokumen yang menyatakan bahwa Pekerjaan yang dilakukan oleh INTI pada setiap akhir triwulan berjalan telah diterima dan dinyatakan baik oleh NEC berdasarkan Berita Acara Rekonsiliasi, BAST diterbitkan oleh NEC dan ditandatangani bersama dengan INTI; k. “Hari Kalender” adalah hari kalender berdasarkan perhitungan kalender Masehi.

2.2.5 Main body

  The main body of contract is a part that outlines the legal norms and terms of the agreement of the contract as a clear, concrete, and detail contract substance in accordance with the agreement of the parties involved in the contract. According to Hukum Kontrak, the points that should be covered in the main body of contract are: “Perumusan isi akta kontrak sebenarnya merupakan pemilihan norma-norma

  

hukum individual dan konkrit dalam aturan hukum positif (peraturan

perundang-undangan yang berlaku) yang mendasari atau berlaku terhadap

seluruh fakta, relasi, dan peristiwa hukum yang dikehendaki atau yang tidak

dikehendaki oleh para pihak yang membuat kontrak. Sebaliknya, perumusan

isi akta kontrak juga dipahami sebagai penyesuaian antara kehendak para

pihak yang membuat kontrak dengan norma-norma hukum individual dan

  

konkrit dalam aturan hukum positif dan mengakomodasi serta memfasilitasi

kehendak para pihak yang membuat kontrak tersebut. (Syaifuddin, 2012:193)

  Substantively, the main body outline must meet three requirements, as stated in Hukum Kontrak, which are essensialia, naturalia, and aksidentalia.

  1. Essensialia is the essential mean of the contract that depends on the type of contract. For example, in purchase agreement, it is essential to put a part about the goods and the price. In contract between NEC and PT INTI, the writer conclude that most of essensialia are covered in:

  1. PASAL 3 LINGKUP PEKERJAAN or Scope or work, which cover about the main conduct of the agreement. Generally it outlines the detail about the work in the agreement.

  2. PASAL 4 SYARAT PELAKSANAAN. It cover about the specific term required to be fulfilled by one of the parties when conducting the work stated in the agreement.

  3. PASAL 5 PROSES PURCHASE ORDER (PO). It outlines about purchase order which released by NEC to PT INTI regarding the service/work in the agreement.

  4. PASAL 7 JANGKA WAKTU. It outlines about the duration of the agreement.

  5. PASAL 8 HARGA PEKERJAAN. It outlines about the price of the work/service.

  6. PASAL 22 PEMBATALAN PERJANJIAN. It outlines about the As for agreement between Huawei and PT INTI, most of the essensialia are covered in:

  1. Scope of Work and Services (1st clause). It outlines about the detail of the work/service in the agreement.

  2. Duration of the Agreement (2nd clause). It outlines about the duration of the agreement.

  3. Price of the Agreement (6th clause) It outline about the price and the payment of the service.

  2. Naturalia is provisions of the law which can be included on the contract. If

  both parties do not include the term in the contract, the contract itself still legitimate and using the provisions from undang-undang as the reference.

  In other word, If the parties involved in the contract did not include some term in Naturalia element, then it will be complemented by Undang

  undang. In agreement between NEC and PT INTI, most of the Naturalia

  element are covered in: 1.

PASAL 9 CARA PEMBAYARAN. It outlines about the detail of payment of the work/service.

  2. PASAL 16 PENGANGKUTAN DAN GUDANG. It outlines the detail regarding transport and storage/warehouse.

  3. PASAL 18 KERUSAKAN DAN/ATAU KERUGIAN. It outlines the detail about the loss or damage of the goods.

  4. PASAL 19 SERAH TERIMA PERANGKAT. It outlines the detail of how the goods will be handover to the client after the work is done.

  5. PASAL 22 PEMBATALAN PERJANJIAN. It outlines the detail of termination of the agreement before the duration of the agreement completed.

  

Naturalia element in the agreement between Huawei and PT INTI is covered

  in: 1.

   Liquidated Damages, Liability and Indemnity (4th clause). It outlines

  the detail of liability and indemnity of one party or both parties including the detail regarding the damage, goods, warehouse and the transport.

  2. Termination of the Agreement (5

  th

  clause). It outlines how the agreement can be terminated halfway along with the consequence.

  3. Aksidentalia element is conditions that should not exist in the contract, but may be included as there are interests of one or both parties. In other word, it’s a complement which is included in the contract because of interest of one or both parties. Example of clauses in the agreement between NEC and PT INTI that cover the aksidentalia element are : 1.

PASAL 15 LAPORAN. It outlines about the weekly and monthly

  report that must be made by PT INTI to NEC during the valid

  2.

  20 PERHITUNGAN AKHIR PEKERJAAN PASAL (REKONSILIASI) DAN SERAH TERIMA PEKERJAAN. It outlines about the reconciliation over the price of the agreement quarterly.

3. PASAL 24 PERAIHAN HAK MILIK. It outlines about the property rights.

  As for Aksidentalia element in the agreement between Huawei and PT

  INTI, it covered in: 1.

   Intellectual Property Rights (10th clause). It outlines about the

  property rights 2.

   Assignments and Sub-Contracting (11th clause) It outlines

  regarding sub-contracting other as the third parties who work for service provider.

2.2.6 Closure

  Closure is the last part of the contract which outlines that the contract is given the seal and signed by both parties that involved in the contract.

  According to Hukum Kontrak, there are four elements of the closure in the contract:

  1. Tempat pembuatan akta or the place where the contract is made. It must be stated the city or village name where the contract is made if it’s not stated in the head of contract.

  2. Penanggalan akta or the date of contract. It must be stated correctly when the contract is made if it’s not stated in the head of contract.

3. Identitas saksi or witness identity. The witness, according to Pasal

  1905 KUH Perdata, Pasal 169 HIR and Pasal 308 RBg need to be

  at least 2 person, and according to Pasal 40 ayat (2) UU No.30

  Tahun 2004, witness required to: 1. At least 18 years old or married.

  2. Proficient in legal acts.

  3. Understand the language used in the contract.

  4. Able to sign.

  5. Do not have a blood or marriage relationship with the notary or both parties involved in the agreement It is not necessary to have witness however if it’s an underhand agreement, or an agreement that made without the notary present as stated in Pasal 1874 ayat (2) KUH Perdata.

  4. Pemateraian Akta or contract sealing. It’s important to have the contract sealed by using materai as if a document is without

  materai

  , legally, it’s not legitimate. It’s based on: “...pembuatan dokumen yang tidak disertai pelunasan bea materai,

  berakibat hukum para pejabat dilarang memperhatikan, mempertimbangkan, melekatkan pada aktanya atau putusannya,

  menyebut, mengutip, menyalin, atau memberi catatan diatasnya” (Soemitro on Syaifuddin, 2012: 200)

5. Tanda tangan or sign. It is to give a sign or name which is used by the signer.

  In the agreement between the NEC and PT INTI, the closure or closing of contract is as followed:

  Demikian Perjanjian ini dibuat dengan itikad baik untuk dipatuhi dan dilaksanakan oleh PARA PIHAK.

  Signed and stamped by both party and sealed with materai worth of 6000 Rupiahs.

  While on the agreement between Huawei and PT INTI, the closure is as followed:

  IN WITNESS WHEREOF, The Parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be duly executed by their respective officers or representatives on this 1st day of February 2013.

  From PT INTI part, signed by President Director for and on behalf of PT

  INDUSTRI TELEKOMUNIKASI INDONESIA in the presence of Marketing Director. For Huawei part, signed by Head of Indonesia Procurement Dept. for and behalf of PT HUAWEI TECH INVESTMENT in the presence of CEG.

  Signed, stamped, and sealed with materai worth of 6000 Rupiahs.

  From data above, we can see that on the agreement between NEC and PT

  INTI, it lack of the date, the place and witness. The date and the place is absent since it already stated in the head of contract/opening, thus it still acceptable. Regarding the absent of witness part, it’s already stated that the presence of witness is not necessary if it’s an underhand contract or contract without the presence of notary. While the contract between Huawei and PT INTI filled all criteria for the closure.

2.2.7 Amendments

  According to Hukum Kontrak, the definition of amendments is: “Perubahan syarat-syarat dan norma-norma hukum dalam akta kontrak

  

disebut amandemen atau addendum, maksudnya perubahan dalam arti

penambahan, penyempurnaan, pengurangan atau penghapusan terhadap

syarat-syarat dan norma-norma hukum dalam akta kontrak yang telah

ditandatangi dan mengikat secara yuridikal bagi para pihak yang membuat

kontrak” (Syaifuddin, 2012: 205)

  In other word, it is to change something in the signed contract with the consent of both parties.

  Regarding amendments, the agreement between NEC and PT INTI is using:

  

PASAL 32

LAIN LAIN 1) Setiap perubahan isi Perjanjian ini termasuk lampirannya akan mengikat apabila dinyatakan secara tertulis dan disetujui oleh PARA

  PIHAK dengan jalan membuat dan menandatangani Amandemen terhadap Perjanjian ini, amandemen tersebut merupakan bagian yang tidak dapat dipisahkan dan mempunyai kekuatan hukum yang sama dengan Perjanjian ini.

  2) Segala ketentuan dan syarat-syarat dalam Perjanjian ini berlaku serta mengikat bagi pihak-pihak yang menandatangi, pengganti- penggantinya dan mereka yang memperoleh keuntungan dari padanya.

  3) Perjanjian ini dibuat dalam rangkap 2 (dua) asli masing-masing sama bunyinya di atas kertas bermaterai cukup serta mempunyai kekuatan hukum yang sama setelah ditandatangani dan dibubuhi cap perusahaan PARA PIHAK.

  As for the agreement between Huawei and PT INTI, regarding the amendments is covered in:

  21. Amendments

  21.1 No changes, alterations, amendments, variation or modifications hereto shall be effective unless made in writing and executed by the authorized representatives of both Parties. From the data above we can see that in both agreements amendments can be made if any change is inevitable by the consent of both parties involved in the agreement. The different between both agreements is only that in the agreement between NEC and PT INTI, the outlines about amendments is in others clause/ Pasal 32 Lain-lain while the agreement between Huawei and PT INTI the clause regarding amendments is on their own. Regardless the position of the clause, as long as there’s an outline regarding the amendments, it’s legitimate.

  CHAPTER III CONCLUSIONS AND SUGGESTIONS

  3.1 Conclusions According to the analysis, it can be concluded that: 1.

   The head of contract/opening between the agreement between NEC and

  PT INTI and the agreement between Huawei and PT INTI are slightly different in the format regarding contract number and the place of where the contract is made; 2.

   The compareo of both agreements are slightly different on the format in

  which one of the agreements only include the subject, the address, and the reference call of both parties involved;

3. The praemisse of both agreement are quite similar; 4.

   The use of definition is only applied by the agreement between NEC and

  PT INTI; 5.

   The main body of contract of the two contracts are different however both

  contracts fulfilled the essensialia, naturalia, and aksidentalia elements that required in the main body of contract;

  6. The different format of closure of the contract between both contracts are caused by the format of the opening and the agreement between the NEC and PT INTI did not use the presence of witness;

7. Both contracts outlines regarding amendments, the different between them is only the place of the amendment clause is in.

  3.2 Suggestions After finishing the research, the writer would like to give some suggestions for the students who will take the same subject as in the following: 1.

   The student should find different type of contract; 2. The student should analyze different aspect of contract anatomy;

  and 3.

   The student should use different source of the theory.

  APPROVAL