Watershed Management Stakeholder Analysis

M odu le 1 – ( L1 - L3 ) I n t r odu ct ion a n d Ba sic Con ce pt s Con ce pt of w a t e r sh e d, in t r odu ct ion t o w a t e r sh e d m a n a ge m e n t , diffe r e n t st a k e h olde r s a n d t h e ir r e la t ive im por t a n ce , w a t e r sh e d p , m a n a ge m e n t policie s a n d de cision m a k in g.

W a t e r sh e d M a n a ge m e n t &

L2 W a t e r sh e d M a n a ge m e n t & L2 L2 – W a t e r sh e d M a n a ge m e n t & L2 St a k e h olde r An a lysis

  Topics Cove r e d Topics Cove r e d

 

Wat ershed syst em ; Wat ershed Managem ent ( WM) -- Wat ershed syst em ; Wat ershed Managem ent ( WM) Obj ect ives, Com ponent s & Benefit s; WM Mult iple use, Obj ect ives, Com ponent s & Benefit s; WM Obj ect ives, Com ponent s & Benefit s; WM-- Mult iple use, Obj ect ives, Com ponent s & Benefit s; WM Mult iple use, Mult iple use, Mult i disciplinary approach, St akeholder analysis, Mult i disciplinary approach, St akeholder analysis, Role of st akeholders in WM developm ent plans; Role of st akeholders in WM developm ent plans; People’s part icipat ion; Case St udy. People’s part icipat ion; Case St udy.

Wat ershed m anagem ent obj ect ives, Developm ent Wat ershed m anagem ent obj ect ives, Developm ent  

Keywords: Keywords: y y

plans, Mult i disciplinary approach, St akeholder analysis, People plans, Mult i disciplinary approach, St akeholder analysis, People part icipat ion.

part icipat ion.

Goa ls: W a t e r sh e d Syst e m I n t e gr it y Goa ls: W a t e r sh e d Syst e m I n t e gr it y y g y y g y

Resource Standards

Conservation goals Resources/ St andards /

Conservat ion Environmental Objectives

Watershed Approach Conservat ion Goals

Co-ordinate Natural Resource Management programmes tools

Nat ural Resources Managem ent Wat ershed Approach Framework g p g And Resources

Nat ural Resources Managem ent Program m es t ools and resources

W a t e r sh e d M a n a ge m e n t a t W a t e r sh e d M a n a ge m e n t a t D iffe r e n t Le ve ls D iffe r e n t Le ve ls D iffe r e n t Le ve ls D iffe r e n t Le ve ls

Wat ershed Managem ent Wat ershed Managem ent

Local Wat ershed St at ewide Social Fram ew ork Social Fram ew ork Fram ew ork Fram ew ork I ndividual

Regional Regional Wat ershed Wat ershed Fram ew ork Prot ect ion Proj ect

Obj e ct ive s of W a t e r sh e d M a n a ge m e n t Obj e ct ive s of W a t e r sh e d M a n a ge m e n t

    Wise Wise use Wise use Wise use of use of of soil, of soil soil, w at er soil w at er & w at er w at er & & veget at ion & veget at ion veget at ion veget at ion-- opt im um opt im um opt im um opt im um product ion-- m ini product ion m ini.. hazard hazard t o t o nat ural nat ural resources resources

  I ndust rial ut ilizat ion & developm ent of lands: I ndust rial ut ilizat ion & developm ent of lands: Conserve w at er, m ore incom e, reduce drought Conserve w at er, m ore incom e, reduce drought

  Prevent ion and ret ardat ion of floods t hrough Prevent ion and ret ardat ion of floods t hrough const ruct ion of reservoirs const ruct ion of reservoirs const ruct ion of reservoirs const ruct ion of reservoirs

  Provision of adequat e w at er for agricult ural, Provision of adequat e w at er for agricult ural, indust rial and dom est ic purpose indust rial and dom est ic purpose indust rial and dom est ic purpose indust rial and dom est ic purpose

  Abat em ent of soil, w at er and air pollut ion Abat em ent of soil, w at er and air pollut ion

  Creat ion of recreat ional facilit ies e.g. lakes Creat ion of recreat ional facilit ies e.g. lakes g g

 

Ut ilize nat ural resources-- im proving agricult ure Ut ilize nat ural resources im proving agricult ure Com ponent s of Wat ershed Managem ent Com ponent s of Wat ershed Managem ent

1 Foundat ion Pract ices: Engineering & biological m easures for Engineering & biological m easures for -- soil and w at er conservat ion soil and w at er conservat ion soil and w at er conservat ion soil and w at er conservat ion Cont our farm ing, diversion bunds, Cont our farm ing, diversion bunds, -- grades of veget at ive bunds, t erraces, grades of veget at ive bunds, t erraces, check dam s et c. check dam s et c.

1 Foundat ion Pract ices:

1. Foundat ion Pract ices:

Wat er st orage st ruct ures : Nullah Wat er st orage st ruct ures : Nullah bunds, gully plugs, bunds, percolat ion bunds, gully plugs, bunds, percolat ion bunds gully plugs bunds percolat ion bunds gully plugs bunds percolat ion t anks t anks Alt ernat e land uses in t he non-- arable Alt ernat e land uses in t he non -- Alt ernat e land uses in t he non Alt ernat e land uses in t he non arable arable arable lands: Afforest at ion and plant at ion of lands: Afforest at ion and plant at ion of fodder and fuel t rees fodder and fuel t rees

Con t d Con t d…. …

2. 2 I m proved Product ion pract ices I m proved Product ion pract ices

– – I n I n-- sit u w at er conservat ion sit u w at er conservat ion
– – Agricult ural w at er m anagem ent Agricult ural w at er m anagem ent I m proved crop and cropping syst em s I m proved crop and cropping syst em s – – I m proved crop and cropping syst em s I m proved crop and cropping syst em s

Foundat ion pract ices depend upon financial Foundat ion pract ices depend upon financial i id d b h i id d b h assist ance provided by t he governm ent assist ance provided by t he governm ent

Product ion pract ices depend upon t he Product ion pract ices depend upon t he p p p p p p people part icipat ion people part icipat ion

Be n e fit s of W a t e r sh e d M a n a ge m e n t Be n e fit s of W a t e r sh e d M a n a ge m e n t

  Cont rol flood drought Cont rol flood drought

  Cont rol flood, drought Cont rol flood, drought

  Reduce erosion and sedim ent product ion Reduce erosion and sedim ent product ion

  Maxim ize product ivit y per unit area, t im e & w at er Maxim ize product ivit y per unit area, t im e & w at er

  I ncrease crop int ensit y I ncrease crop int ensit y p y p y

  Ut ilizat ion of m arginal or w ast e lands t hrough Ut ilizat ion of m arginal or w ast e lands t hrough alt ernat e land use syst em s alt ernat e land use syst em s a t e at e a d use syst e s a t e at e a d use syst e s

  Ensure ecological balance Ensure ecological balance

  Maxim ize com bined incom e Maxim ize com bined incom e

  St abilize incom e in unfavorable condit ions St abilize incom e in unfavorable condit ions

W a t e r sh e d M a n a ge m e n t St r a t e gie s W a t e r sh e d M a n a ge m e n t St r a t e gie s

 

preserve exist ing preserve exist ing i i i i

Prevent ive st rat egies Prevent ive st rat egies Prevent ive st rat egies Prevent ive st rat egies

– – sust ainable land use st rat egies. sust ainable land use st rat eg
– Prevent problem s in a wat ershed Prevent problem s in a wat ershed Prevent problem s in a wat ershed Prevent problem s in a wat ershed –

 

designed t o overcom e designed t o overcom e

Rest orat ive st rat egies Rest orat ive st rat egies

– –

ident ified problem s ident ified problem s – ident ified problem s ident ified problem s – t o rest ore condit ions in a wat ershed t o rest ore condit ions in a wat ershed t o rest ore condit ions in a wat ershed t o rest ore condit ions in a wat ershed t o desirable level . t o desirable level .

– To rest ore condit ions once problem s occurred. To rest ore condit ions once problem s occurred. –

  I n m ost cases – I n m ost cases – WM bet w een t w o ext rem es: WM bet w een t w o ext rem es:

Rout ine prevent ive st rat egies & som e Rest orat ive Rout ine prevent ive st rat egies & som e Rest orat ive st rat egies. st rat egies. st rat egies st rat egies

Prevent ive st rat egies – Prevent ive st rat egies key t o WM key t o WM

–  

W a t e r sh e d M a n a ge m e n t – W a t e r sh e d M a n a ge m e n t – m u lt iple u se m u lt iple u se Re sou r ce s Pr odu ct s

To To

Aim of m ult iple use: Aim of m ult iple use: Wat er I rrigat ion,

m anage nat ural resources m anage nat ural resources --

Municipal Municipal

m ost beneficial com binat ion m ost beneficial com binat ion m ost beneficial com binat ion m ost beneficial com binat ion

indust rial and

for present & fut ure uses for present & fut ure uses

Recreat ion Resource Orient ed: Resource Orient ed: Resource Orient ed: Resource Orient ed:

Tim ber Ti b Pulp, Wood, Fuel, P l W d F l

product ion capabilit ies of product ion capabilit ies of

Recreat ion

nat ural resources nat ural resources

Forage g Livest ock, Wild , life, Recreat ion Area Orient ed: Area Orient ed: Based on Based on

Wildlife Consum pt ion, dynam ics of local, dynam ics of local, y y

Recreat ion Recreat ion regional and nat ional regional and nat ional

Minerals Depends on t ype dem ands dem ands of m ineral

M u lt i-- D isciplin a r y Appr oa ch in W M M u lt i D isciplin a r y Appr oa ch in W M Scopin g a n d Pla n n e r s, Scie n t ist s, pu blic da t a ga t h e r in g ou t r e a ch e x pe r t s, st a k e h olde r s Ecologist s, H ydr ologist s, Asse ssm e n t En gin e e r s, Econ om ist s Pr ior it ie s a n d St a k e h olde r s, Officia ls, t a r ge t s Scie n t ist s, Pla n n e r s Pla n n e r s, St a k e h olde r s, Pla n Officia ls, Scie n t ist s, En gin e e r s Officia ls, Scie n t ist s, En gin e e r s D e ve lopm e n t D e ve lopm e n t St a k e h olde r s, Re gu la t or s, , g

I m plem ent at ion I m plem ent at ion Te ch n ica l su ppor t , e x pe r t s

Con ce pt of St a k e h olde r s Con ce pt of St a k e h olde r s

“ St akeholder” “ St akeholder”

Any group Any group of of people, people, organized organized or or

unorganized, unorganized, w ho unorganized w ho unorganized w ho share w ho share share a share a a com m on a com m on com m on int erest com m on int erest int erest or int erest or or st ake or st ake st ake st ake in a in a part icular part icular issue issue or or syst em syst em ..

I m por t a n ce of st a k e h olde r s I m por t a n ce of st a k e h olde r s

  St akeholders involvem ent -- key aspect s in t he St akeholders involvem ent key aspect s in t he success t o im plem ent developm ent act ivit ies success t o im plem ent developm ent act ivit ies success t o im plem ent developm ent act ivit ies success t o im plem ent developm ent act ivit ies

  I nvolvem ent of st akeholders helps -- dovet ailing I nvolvem ent of st akeholders helps dovet ailing of funds, supply of goods and hum an of funds, supply of goods and hum an f f f f d d l f l f d d d h d h resources required for proj ect im plem ent at ion resources required for proj ect im plem ent at ion

  I nvolvem ent of st akeholders -- leads t o a I nvolvem ent of st akeholders leads t o a confidence building process for com m unit y confidence building process for com m unit y b based proj ect s b based proj ect s d d j j t t

St a k e h olde r An a lysis ( SA) St a k e h olde r An a lysis ( SA) y y ( ( ) )

  St akeholder analysis -- generat e know ledge St akeholder analysis generat e know ledge about relevant act ors about relevant act ors -- t o underst and t heir about relevant act ors t o underst and t heir about relevant act ors t o underst and t heir t o underst and t heir behavior , int ent ions, int er-- relat ions, agendas, behavior , int ent ions, int er relat ions, agendas, int erest and influence and resources t hey int erest and influence and resources t hey bring t o bear on decision m aking process bring t o bear on decision m aking process

  St akeholder analysis -- t ool for policy St akeholder analysis t ool for policy form ulat ion and im plem ent at ion form ulat ion and im plem ent at ion

  Developed -- t o Developed p p t o challenge challenge of g g of m ult iple m ult iple obj ect ives p p obj ect ives jj and int erest s and int erest s

St e ps for St a k e h olde r An a lysis ( SA) St e ps for St a k e h olde r An a lysis ( SA) p p y y ( ( ) )

  St akeholder I dent ificat ion St akeholder I dent ificat ion

    Developm ent of relevant issues and t heir Developm ent of relevant issues and t heir Developm ent of relevant issues and t heir Developm ent of relevant issues and t heir charact erizat ion charact erizat ion

    Discussion w it h regional and local subj ect Discussion w it h regional and local subj ect Discussion w it h regional and local subj ect Discussion w it h regional and local subj ect m at t er expert ( form al as w ell as non-- form al m at t er expert ( form al as w ell as non form al int erview ))) int erview )

  Focused group discussion Focused group discussion

  Sem i-- st ruct ured int erview s Sem i st ruct ured int erview s

  Developm ent of I nfluence-- int erest m at Developm ent of I nfluence int erest m at rix rix

St a k e h olde r s I de n t ifica t ion St a k e h olde r s I de n t ifica t ion

D e ve lopm e n t a l I ssu e s & M e t h ods D e ve lopm e n t a l I ssu e s & M e t h ods p p

 

Cross cut t ing syst em & st akeholder int erest s Cross cut t ing syst em & st akeholder int erest s

   

Mult iple uses and users of t he Resources Mult iple uses and users of t he Resources Mult iple uses and users of t he Resources Mult iple uses and users of t he Resources

 

Subt ract abilit y and t em poral t rade-- offs Subt ract abilit y and t em poral t rade offs

 

Povert y and under-- represent at ion Povert y and under represent at ion

Photo, A.K. Singh, 2002  

M e t h ods M e t h ods

Focus group discussion Focus group discussion – – People’s opinion People’s opinion – I nt eract ive – I nt eract ive – gives dat a & insight . Eg. Wom en group gives dat a & insight . Eg. Wom en group

–  

 

Sem i-- st ruct ured int erviews: about nat ural resources, Sem i st ruct ured int erviews: about nat ural resources, problem s & solut ions. problem s & solut ions. problem s & solut ions. problem s & solut ions.

 

I nt erest – I nt erest –I nfluence Mat rix: t o underst and t he relat ive I nfluence Mat rix: t o underst and t he relat ive int erest s and influence of t he st akeholders int erest s and influence of t he st akeholders

USEPA Appr oa ch e s USEPA Appr oa ch e s

 

St akeholder involvem ent is essent ial t o t he developm ent St akeholder involvem ent is essent ial t o t he developm ent

– eg. Wat er pollut ion m anagem ent eg. Wat er pollut ion m anagem ent –

 

USEPA USEPA – – Two approaches Two approaches  Tradit ional sim ulat ion and decision m aking approach 

– Tradit ional sim ulat ion and decision m aking approach – based on com m and & cont rol St akeholders based on com m and & cont rol based on com m and & cont rol -- St akeholders based on com m and & cont rol St akeholders St akeholders involvem ent – involvem ent – aft er m ost decisions m ade aft er m ost decisions m ade

 Decision support syst em for st akeholder involvem ent  Decision support syst em for st akeholder involvem ent -- I nvolves st akeholders t o m ake m anagem ent decisions

I I I nvolves st akeholders t o m ake m anagem ent decisions l l t k h ld t k h ld t t k k t d t d i i i i

Guides st akeholders t hrough t he decision m aking Guides st akeholders t hrough t he decision m aking process – process – Fit s t he needs Fit s t he needs – – Mult iple opt ions accessible. Mult iple opt ions accessible.

 WARMF  WARMF -- Wat ershed Analysis Risk Managem ent Wat ershed Analysis Risk Managem ent Fram ew ork -- Dat a Module, Engineering Module, Fram ework Dat a Module, Engineering Module, Knowledge Module DSS Knowledge Module Knowledge Module -- DSS Knowledge Module DSS DSS

St a k e h olde r An a lysis St a k e h olde r An a lysis-- r oa d m a p r oa d m a p

 Organize t hem selves  Organize t hem selves g g _{List Organization}  Develop a work plan  Develop a work plan  I d   I dent ify wat er qualit y issues  I dent ify w at er qualit y issues I d t if t t if t lit lit i i _Simulate  Learn about river basin  Learn about river basin  Form ulat e alt ernat ives  Form ulat e alt ernat ives  Perform analysis  Perform analysis y y  Research Consensus  Research Consensus _Consensus _{achieved?. hi d?}

SA in W M -- Pe ople Pa r t icipa t ion SA in W M Pe ople Pa r t icipa t ion

 

Sust ainabilit y of Sust ainabilit y of WM WM program m e program m e is is not not possible if possible if t he t he people people are are bypassed bypassed in in planning and planning and decision decision m aking m aking processes processes

 

Role of Role of proj ect proj ect im plem ent at ion im plem ent at ion agencies agencies

 

Com m unit y organizat ions Com m unit y organizat ions and/ or and/ or NGOs NGOs

   

They should m ake effort s t o ensure t hat They should m ake effort s t o ensure t hat They should m ake effort s t o ensure t hat They should m ake effort s t o ensure t hat people have cont rol over ent ire process people have cont rol over ent ire process

   

Ent ire process Ent ire process Ent ire process-- planning and Ent ire process planning and planning and planning and im plem ent at ion, including financial and im plem ent at ion, including financial and t echnical m onit oring and evaluat ion t echnical m onit oring and evaluat ion

SA in W M -- Pe ople Pa r t icipa t ion .. SA in W M Pe ople Pa r t icipa t ion ..

  Promotion of Promotion of sustainable sustainable economic economic development development

 Optimum  Optimum utilization utilization of of land, land, water water and and vegetation vegetation to to mitigate the mitigate the adverse adverse effects effects of of drought drought Provide employment employment and and local local capacity capacity building building to to generate generate

  Provide income income

  Restore Restore ecological ecological balance balance through through community community participation p participation p p p

  I mproving living I mproving living conditions conditions of of the the poorer poorer through through more more equitable more more equitable equitable resources equitable resources resources distribution resources distribution distribution distribution

SA in W M -- Pe ople Pa r t icipa t ion .. SA in W M Pe ople Pa r t icipa t ion ..

Ref: A. K. Singh, g , Eldh o T. I ., D. Prinz, ( 2002) , ‘I nt egrat ed wat ershed approach for com bat ing , , ( ) , g pp g drought in sem i- arid region of I ndia: A case of Jhabua wat ershed’, Jou r n a l of W a t e r Scie n ce

SA in W M -- Pe ople Pa r t icipa t ion .. SA in W M Pe ople Pa r t icipa t ion .

Ref: A. K. Singh, Eldh o T. I ., D. Prinz, ( 2002) , ‘I nt egrat ed wat ershed approach for com bat ing drought in sem i- arid region of I ndia: A case of Jhabua wat ershed’, Jou r n a l of W a t e r Scie n ce

_{. 85-92.}

a n d Te ch n ology, Vol. 46( 6- 7) , 2002, pp

Natural Social Resources Mapping Mapping M Mapping i Village Volunteers Volunteers Participatory Participatory Appraisal

I mplementation Prioritising g Options

Ca se St u dy: Jh a bu a w a t e r sh e d Ca se St u dy: Jh a bu a w a t e r sh e d

Cat chm ent Area- 1800 km

2 Avg. rainfall ~ 750m m / annum .

57% bl l d ~ 57% arable land

W a t e r sh e d Re la t e d Pr oble m s W a t e r sh e d Re la t e d Pr oble m s

 

Econom ically am ong m ost backward regions in I ndia Econom ically am ong m ost backward regions in I ndia

 

Forest cover -- sparsely dist ribut ed on sloping lands Forest cover sparsely dist ribut ed on sloping lands

 

Wat ershed has poor soil dept h Wat ershed has poor soil dept h -- 0.30 0.30-- 0.40 m in hilly 0.40 m in hilly areas and 1-- 2m in valleys areas and 1 2m in valleys

   

Classified as drought prone based on agro ecological Classified as drought prone based on agro Classified as drought prone based on agro-- ecological Classified as drought prone based on agro ecological ecological classificat ion classificat ion

Socio-- econom ic Socio econom ic charact erist ics charact erist ics users users of of nat ural nat ural resources cat egorized resources eso eso es es at ego i ed cat egorized below at ego i ed belo below povert y belo po e t po e t povert y line line line line

 

 

Seasonal m igrat ion Seasonal m igrat ion (( 50 50% % )) t o t o nearby nearby urban urban cent ers cent ers in in search of search of j obs jj j obs

Maj or crops: Maize, Cot t on, Peanut s, Soyabeans; G Gram , Black beans, Oil seeds. Bl k b Oil d

Photo, A.K. Singh, 2002

Photo, A.K. Singh, 2002 D e ve lopm e n t a l I n t e r ve n t ion s D e ve lopm e n t a l I n t e r ve n t ion s

Developm ent al int ervent ions t aken place at Developm ent al int ervent ions t aken place at

1990s & 2000s) 1990s & 2000s) 1990s & 2000s) 1990s & 2000s)

Jhabua Wat ershed Jhabua Jhabua Jhabua Wat ershed Wat ershed Wat ershed – – NGOs ( NGOs ( NGOs ( NGOs (

 Wat er harvest ing for supplem ent ary irrigat ion  Wat er harvest ing for supplem ent ary irrigat ion  Soil and wat er conservat ion  Soil and wat er conservat ion  Joint Forest Managem ent   Joint Forest Managem ent  Joint Forest Managem ent Joint Forest Managem ent  Com m unit y part icipat ion and local capacit y building  Com m unit y part icipat ion and local capacit y building  Wom en em powerm ent  Wom en em powerm ent   W t   Wat er regulat ion Wat er regulat ion W t l t i l t i

Photo, A.K. Singh, 2002

Com m u n it y pa r t icipa t ion a n d loca l Com m u n it y pa r t icipa t ion a n d loca l ca pa cit y bu ildin g ca pa cit y bu ildin g it b ildi it b ildi

  People in Jhabua People in p p Jhabua wat ershed wat ershed -- involved in involved in developm ent al act ivit ies -- concept ion, developm ent al act ivit ies concept ion, planning, financing and m aint enance planning, financing and m aint enance

  Eg. Social m apping & resources m apping was Eg . Social m apping & resources m apping was undert aken t oget her w it h village com m unit y, undert aken t oget her w it h village com m unit y, & it & com m unit y organizers ( CO) . & com m unit y organizers ( CO) . & it i i ( CO) ( CO)

  Efficient ut ilizat ion of funds Efficient ut ilizat ion of funds

  10 15% i 10 10-- 15% is spent on adm inist rat ion 10 15% is spent on adm inist rat ion 15% i t t d d i i t i i t t i t i

Photo, A.K. Singh, 2002  

85-- 90% are used for act ual proj ect 85 90% are used for act ual proj ect im plem ent at ion act ivit ies im plem ent at ion act ivit ies im plem ent at ion act ivit ies im plem ent at ion act ivit ies

Photo, A.K. Singh, 2002 Wat er Regulat ion & Forest Managem ent Wat er Regulat ion & Forest Managem ent

 

Self-- regulat ion: com m unit y based wat ershed Self regulat ion: com m unit y based wat ershed m onit oring syst em m onit oring syst em m onit oring syst em m onit oring syst em

 

Local people Local people -- developed syst em of wat er m anagem ent developed syst em of wat er m anagem ent

 

Account ing uncert aint ies of rainfall and ret aining t he Account ing uncert aint ies of rainfall and ret aining t he runoff from t he wat ershed runoff from t he wat ershed ff f ff f h h h d h d

 

Sharing of wat er -- fam ily size & locat ion of fields close Sharing of wat er fam ily size & locat ion of fields close t o source t o source t o source t o source

 

Wat er use priorit ies had given t o Wat er use priorit ies had given t o

– Life support ing syst em t han needs – Life support ing syst em t han needs-- during drought during drought

 

Joint Forest Managem ent – Joint Forest Managem ent – Forest com m it t ees Forest com m it t ees --

con ce pt of “Socia l Fe n cin g”

Forest developm ent – in 10 years ( 1991- 2000) – from 16% t o 25- 30% forest cover. 16% t o 25 30% forest cover.

 

Photo, A.K. Singh, 2002  

Wom en em powerm ent Wom en em powerm ent

 

Children goes t o school Children goes t o school

 

No m igrat ion No m igrat ion

I m pact Assessm ent I m pact Assessm ent Photo, A.K. Singh, 2002

 

Drought proofing Drought proofing

 

I m proved agricult ural out put : 30 I m proved agricult ural out put : 30-- 100% increase 100% increase

 

Wat er availabilit y im proved considerably Wat er availabilit y im proved considerably -- About 2- 4m wat er level increase is observed in select ed wells. d l l d l l

 

Overall social & econom ical im provem ent Overall social & econom ical im provem ent

W M Ca se St u dy– Le sson s Le a r n e d

 

I nt egrat ion-- appropriat e t echnical & m anagerial m easures I nt egrat ion appropriat e t echnical & m anagerial m easures

 

Success u Successful t echnical aspect s: Successful t echnical aspect s: Success u ec ec ca aspec s ca aspec s

Syst em at ic wat ershed developm ent work, Syst em at ic wat ershed developm ent work,
Priorit izat ion of wat er conservat ion m easures Priorit izat ion of wat er conservat ion m easures
Harvest ed wat er for supplem ent ary irrigat ion Harvest ed wat er for supplem ent ary irrigat ion

 

St akeholder analysis in WM St akeholder analysis in WM

   

People’s part icipat ion from incept ion t o im plem ent at ion People s part icipat ion from incept ion t o im plem ent at ion People s part icipat ion from incept ion t o im plem ent at ion People’s part icipat ion from incept ion t o im plem ent at ion

 

Rest orat ion of ecological balance t hrough com m unit y Rest orat ion of ecological balance t hrough com m unit y

part icipat ion & sust ainable developm ent of nat ural resources resources

part icipat ion & sust ainable developm ent of nat ural

 

Encouragem ent of available low cost affordable Encouragem ent of available low cost affordable t echnologies for easy accept ance t echnologies for easy accept ance t echnologies for easy accept ance t echnologies for easy accept ance

_{ } Re fe r e n ce s Re fe r e n ce s Brugha, R., Varvasovszky,Z.( 2000) Brugha, R., Varvasovszky,Z.( 2000) H e a lt h Policy a n d Pla n n in g H e a lt h Policy a n d Pla n n in g , Oxford , Oxford _{ } Universit y Press , vol. 15( 3) . Universit y Press , vol. 15( 3) . Carl, W. C., Joel, H., and Laura W.( 2004) Carl, W. C., Joel, H., and Laura W.( 2004) D e cision Su ppor t Syst e m for D e cision Su ppor t Syst e m for

_{  Reed M et al., ( 2009) Reed M et al., ( 2009) W h o’s in a n d w h y? A t yopology of st a k e h oldr a n a lysis W h o’s in a n d w h y? A t yopology of st a k e h oldr a n a lysis}

St a k e h olde r I n volve m e n t . St a k e h olde r I n volve m e n t . St a k e h olde r I n volve m e n t . St a k e h olde r I n volve m e n t . Journal of environm ent al engineering, ASCE. Journal of environm ent al engineering, ASCE. Journal of environm ent al engineering, ASCE. Journal of environm ent al engineering, ASCE. _{  Grim ble R., Wellard K. ( 1997) Grim ble R., Wellard K. ( 1997) St a k e h olde r M e t h odologie s in N a t u r a l St a k e h olde r M e t h odologie s in N a t u r a l} m e t h ods for n a t u r a l r e sou r ce s,, m e t h ods for n a t u r a l r e sou r ce s Journal of Env. Managem ent . Journal of Env. Managem ent .

Re sou r ce M a n a ge m e n t : a r e vie w of pr in ciple , con t e x t , e x pe r ie n ce s a n d Re sou r ce M a n a ge m e n t : a r e vie w of pr in ciple , con t e x t , e x pe r ie n ce s a n d _{  Salam A.,Toshikuni M. ( 2006) Salam A.,Toshikuni M. ( 2006) Eva lu a t in g ca pa cit y de ve lopm e n t for Eva lu a t in g ca pa cit y de ve lopm e n t for} oppor t u n it ie s oppor t u n it ie s t t it i it i ,, Agricult ural Syst em s , Vol 55( 2) . A A Agricult ural Syst em s , Vol 55( 2) . i i lt lt l S l S t t V l 55( 2) V l 55( 2) pa r t icipa t or y for e st m a n a ge m e n t in Ba n gla de sh ’s Sa l for e st ba se d on 4 R’s pa r t icipa t or y for e st m a n a ge m e n t in Ba n gla de sh ’s Sa l for e st ba se d on 4 R’s _{   } st a k e h olde r s a n a lysis, For e st Policy a n d Econ om ics,, st a k e h olde r s a n a lysis, For e st Policy a n d Econ om ics pp 785-- 796. pp 785 796.

Anupam Anupam Anupam Anupam K K K..S K..S S..,, S..,, Eldho T Eldho Eldho Eldho T T.. T..

II .. ..,, ..,, and Diet er and and Diet er and Diet er Diet er P.. P P.. P (( 2002 (( 2002 2002)) 2002)) I n t e gr a t e d I n t e gr a t e d I n t e gr a t e d I n t e gr a t e d w a t e r sh e d w a t e r sh e d w a t e r sh e d w a t e r sh e d a ppr oa ch for a ppr oa ch for com ba t in g com ba t in g dr ou gh t dr ou gh t in in se m ia r id se m ia r id r e gion r e gion of of I n dia I n dia :: A A ca se ca se of of Jh a bu a w a t e r sh e d Jh a bu a w a t e r sh e d ,, Wat er _{ } Wat er Science Science & & Technology, Technology, Vol Vol.. 46 46 (( 6 6-- 7 7) , ) , pp pp 85 85-- 92

II ..

92 ht t p: / / w w w .fao.org/ docrep/ x5307e/ x5307e00.ht m # Cont ent s ht t p: / / w w w .fao.org/ docrep/ x5307e/ x5307e00.ht m # Cont ent s

“ The com m unit y’s t oolbox: t he idea, m et hods and t ools for part icipat ory – “ The com m unit y’s t oolbox: t he idea, m et hods and t ools for part icipat ory – _{ } assessm ent , m onit oring and evaluat ion in t he com m unit y forest ry” assessm ent , m onit oring and evaluat ion in t he com m unit y forest ry” ht t p: / / w w w .sas2.net / t ools/ social-- analysis ht t p: / / w w w .sas2.net / t ools/ social analysis-- t echniques t echniques

SAS2 S SAS2 S SAS2 Social Analysis Techniques SAS2 Social Analysis Techniques i l A i l A l l i T i T h i h i – –

Tu t or ia ls - Qu e st ion s!.?

 Discuss t he wat ershed m anagem ent

A) issues at different levels. issues at different levels.

 

B) I llust rat e w at ershed m anagem ent as a m ult i disciplinary approach.

B) I llust rat e w at ershed m anagem ent as a



C) Discuss t he USEPA approaches of ) pp St akeholder analysis.

Se lf Eva lu a t ion - Qu e st ion s!. Q



A) What are t he im port ant com ponent s of wat ershed m anagem ent pract ices?. wat ershed m anagem ent pract ices? 

B) What are t he im port ant benefit s of wat ershed m anagem ent ?. wat ershed m anagem ent ? 



D) I llust rat e St akeholder analysis w it hin t he p perspect ive of “ People part icipat ion” ?. p p p p

Assign m e n t - Qu e st ion s?. g Q



A) What are t he im port ant obj ect ives of wat ershed m anagem ent ?. wat ershed m anagem ent ? 

B) Discuss wat ershed m anagem ent wit hin t he perspect ives of m ult iple uses of t he perspect ives of “ m ult iple uses” of resources.

 

C) Describe t he wat ershed m anagem ent st rat egies w it h exam ples?.

C) Describe t he wat ershed m anagem ent



D) Wit h t he help of a case st udy, show t he ) p y, im port ance of St akeholder Analysis in Wat ershed Managem ent ?.

Un solve d Pr oble m !. Un solve d Pr oble m !

Consider a hypot het ical sit uat ion of canal wat er Consider a hypot het ical sit uat ion of canal wat er •• supply for a village in I ndia, where wat er is drawn supply for a village in I ndia, where wat er is drawn supply for a village in I ndia, where wat er is drawn supply for a village in I ndia, where wat er is drawn and regulat ed from m edium size irrigat ion t ank t o and regulat ed from m edium size irrigat ion t ank t o bot h u/ s and d/ s com m and areas. Draw various bot h u/ s and d/ s com m and areas. Draw various st akeholders form al and inform al involved for it st akeholders form al and inform al involved for it st akeholders form al and inform al involved for it , st akeholders form al and inform al involved for it , t heir individual int erest s and int erest -- influence t heir individual int erest s and int erest influence m at rix for t hem . m at rix for t hem .

Hint : Form al st akeholders Hint : Form al st akeholders •• Hi t F Hi t F l t k h ld l t k h ld

A. Governm ent al agency; B. Village Elect oral Represent at ive

C. Form al Associat ions; D. Associat ion of indust ries

A. A R A R Research organizat ion / t eam h h i i i i / /  

A. Research organizat ion / t eam

I nform al st akeholders I nform al st akeholders

1. Farm er’s group; 2. Village level com m unit y group

Dr. T. I. Eldho Dr. T. I. Eldho Professor, Professor, Department of Civil Engineering, Department of Civil Engineering, p p g g g g Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, Mumbai, India, 400 076. Mumbai, India, 400 076. Email: Email: Email: Email: eldho@iitb.ac.in eldho@iitb.ac.in eldho@iitb.ac.in eldho@iitb.ac.in

Watershed Management Stakeholder Analysis