RESP Soal 1 Soal 2 Soal 3 Soal 4 Soal 5 Soal 6 Total Rata2

Lampiran 8 Rekapitulasi Jawaban responden dikelompokkan Genap & Ganjil

Tabel X1.2 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 3 2 2 0 3 1 2 1 4 5 1 4 6 3 9 9 10 16 12 9

Jumlah 70 70 70 70 70 70 Ganjil

Genap

143 Tabel X1.4

Jumlah 70 70 70 70 70 70 Ganjil

Genap

134 Tabel X2

Jumlah 70 70 70 70 70 70 Ganjil

Genap

139 Tabel Y

Jumlah 70 70 70 70 70 70 Ganjil

Genap

Hasil uji validitas dengan correlation variabel X 1.1

Correlations

Kualitas X1.1 X1.2 X1.3 X1.4 X1.5 X1.6 Pelayanan

.280 * -0.014 .354 ** Sig. (2-tailed)

X1.1 Pearson Correlation

70 70 70 70 70 70 70 X1.2 Pearson Correlation

0.044 0.107 .401 ** Sig. (2-tailed)

70 70 70 70 70 70 70 X1.3 Pearson Correlation

0.062 0.151 .469 ** Sig. (2-tailed)

70 70 70 70 70 70 70 X1.4 Pearson Correlation

1 0.004 0.075 .415 ** Sig. (2-tailed)

70 70 70 70 70 70 70 X1.5 Pearson Correlation

1 0.002 .365 ** Sig. (2-tailed)

70 70 70 70 70 70 70 X1.6 Pearson Correlation

0.002 1 .398 ** Sig. (2-tailed)

Pearson Correlation

Sig. (2-tailed)

70 70 70 70 70 70 70 *. Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed). **. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).

Hasil uji validitas dengan correlation variabel X 1.2

Correlations

Kualitas X1.7 X1.8 X1.9 X1.10 X1.11 X1.12 Pelayanan

X1.7 Pearson Correlation

0.15 0.075 0.196 .483 ** Sig. (2-tailed)

70 70 70 70 70 70 70 X1.8 Pearson Correlation

0.052 0.16 .486 ** Sig. (2-tailed)

70 70 70 70 70 70 70 X1.9 Pearson Correlation

-0.013 0.137 .557 ** Sig. (2-tailed)

70 70 70 70 70 70 70 X1.10 Pearson Correlation

1 .369 ** 0.185 .401 ** Sig. (2-tailed)

70 70 70 70 70 70 70 X1.11 Pearson Correlation

1 0.009 .362 ** Sig. (2-tailed)

70 70 70 70 70 70 70 X1.12 Pearson Correlation

0.009 1 .369 ** Sig. (2-tailed)

Pearson Correlation

Sig. (2-tailed)

0.002 0.002 N

70 70 70 70 70 70 70 *. Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed). **. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).

Correlations

Kualitas X1.13 X1.14 X1.15 X1.16 X1.17 X1.18 Pelayanan

X1.13 Pearson Correlation

.328 ** 0.105 .358 ** Sig. (2-tailed)

70 70 70 70 70 70 70 X1.14 Pearson Correlation

0.156 0.072 .368 ** Sig. (2-tailed)

70 70 70 70 70 70 70 X1.15 Pearson Correlation

0.035 0.031 .380 ** Sig. (2-tailed)

70 70 70 70 70 70 70 X1.16 Pearson Correlation

1 0.037 0.054 .408 ** Sig. (2-tailed)

70 70 70 70 70 70 70 X1.17 Pearson Correlation

1 0.101 .371 ** Sig. (2-tailed)

70 70 70 70 70 70 70 X1.18 Pearson Correlation

0.101 1 .407 ** Sig. (2-tailed)

Pearson Correlation

Sig. (2-tailed)

70 70 70 70 70 70 70 **. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).

*. Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).

Hasil uji validitas dengan correlation variabel X 1.4

Correlations

Kualitas X1.19 X1.20 X1.21 X1.22 X1.23 X1.24 Pelayanan

X1.19 Pearson Correlation

0.102 0.183 .437 ** Sig. (2-tailed)

70 70 70 70 70 70 70 X1.20 Pearson Correlation

0.199 0.165 .401 ** Sig. (2-tailed)

70 70 70 70 70 70 70 X1.21 Pearson Correlation

0.194 0.225 .604 ** Sig. (2-tailed)

70 70 70 70 70 70 70 X1.22 Pearson Correlation

1 .505 ** -0.012 .353 ** Sig. (2-tailed)

70 70 70 70 70 70 70 X1.23 Pearson Correlation

1 -0.073 .408 ** Sig. (2-tailed)

70 70 70 70 70 70 70 X1.24 Pearson Correlation

-0.073 1 .402 ** Sig. (2-tailed)

Pearson Correlation

Sig. (2-tailed)

70 70 70 70 70 70 70 *. Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed). **. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).

Correlations

Kualitas X1.25 X1.26 X1.27 X1.28 X1.29 X1.30 Pelayanan

X1.25 Pearson Correlation

0.2 0.067 .394 ** Sig. (2-tailed)

70 70 70 70 70 70 70 X1.26 Pearson Correlation

-0.028 0.024 .417 ** Sig. (2-tailed)

70 70 70 70 70 70 70 X1.27 Pearson Correlation

-0.047 0.024 .408 ** Sig. (2-tailed)

70 70 70 70 70 70 70 X1.28 Pearson Correlation

1 .573 ** 0.128 .359 ** Sig. (2-tailed)

70 70 70 70 70 70 70 X1.29 Pearson Correlation

1 0 .403 ** Sig. (2-tailed)

70 70 70 70 70 70 70 X1.30 Pearson Correlation

0 1 .403 ** Sig. (2-tailed)

Pearson Correlation

Sig. (2-tailed)

70 70 70 70 70 70 70 **. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).

Hasil uji validitas dengan correlation variabel X 2

Correlations

Perilaku Individu

X2.1 X2.2 X2.3 X2.4 X2.5 X2.6 Konsumen X2.1 Pearson Correlation

0.16 0.116 0.216 .583 ** Sig. (2-tailed)

70 70 70 70 70 70 70 X2.2 Pearson Correlation

0.224 0.201 .767 ** Sig. (2-tailed)

70 70 70 70 70 70 70 X2.3 Pearson Correlation

0.002 0.203 .677 ** Sig. (2-tailed)

70 70 70 70 70 70 70 X2.4 Pearson Correlation

1 0.177 .256 * .577 ** Sig. (2-tailed)

70 70 70 70 70 70 70 X2.5 Pearson Correlation

1 0.027 .416 ** Sig. (2-tailed)

70 70 70 70 70 70 70 X2.6 Pearson Correlation

0.027 1 .532 ** Sig. (2-tailed)

.416 ** .532 ** 1 Individu Konsumen

Pearson Correlation

Sig. (2-tailed) 0 0 0 0 0 0 N

70 70 70 70 70 70 70 *. Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed). **. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).

Hasil uji validitas dengan correlation variabel Y

Correlations

Minat Pembelian

Y.5 Y.6 Ulang Y.1

0.149 0.098 .461 ** Sig. (2-tailed)

Pearson Correlation

Pearson Correlation

0.181 .259 * .651 ** Sig. (2-tailed)

Pearson Correlation

0.139 .241 * .535 ** Sig. (2-tailed)

1 .246 * .365 ** .714 ** Sig. (2-tailed)

Pearson Correlation

Pearson Correlation

1 0.156 .500 ** Sig. (2-tailed)

0.156 1 .620 ** Sig. (2-tailed)

Pearson Correlation

Pearson Correlation

Sig. (2-tailed) 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ulang N

70 70 70 70 70 70 70 *. Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed). **. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).

Frequencies

Statistics

X 1.1

X 1.1 X1.2 X1.3 X1.4 X 1.5 X 1.6 N

Frequency Table

X 1.1.1

X 1.1.2

X 1.1.3

Valid

Cumulative

Frequency

Percent

Percent

Percent

Valid

Total

X 1.1.4

Valid Cumulative

Percent Percent Valid

X 1.1.5

Valid Cumulative

Percent Percent Valid

X 1.1.6

Valid Cumulative

Percent Percent Valid

Frequency

Percent

5 33 0.47 0.47 1.00 Total

Frequencies

Statistics

X 1.2

X 2.1 X2.2 X2.3 X2.4 X 2.5 X 2.6 N

Frequency Table

X 1.2.1

X 1.2.2

X 1.2.3

Valid

Cumulative

Frequency

Percent

Percent

Percent

Valid

Total

X 1.2.4

Valid Cumulative

Percent Percent Valid

X 1.2.5

Valid Cumulative

Percent Percent Valid

X 1.2.6

Valid Cumulative

Percent Percent Valid

Frequency

Percent

5 36 0.51 0.51 1.00 Total

Frequencies

Statistics

X 1.3

X 3.1 X3.2 X3.3 X3.4 X 3.5 X 3.6 N

Frequency Table

X 1.3.1

X 1.3.2

X 1.3.3

Valid

Cumulative

Frequency

Percent

Percent

Percent

Valid

Total

X 1.3.4

Valid Cumulative

Percent Percent Valid

X 1.3.5

Valid Cumulative

Percent Percent Valid

X 1.3.6

Valid Cumulative

Percent Percent Valid

Frequency

Percent

5 28 0.40 0.40 1.00 Total

Frequencies

Statistics

X 1.4

X 4.1 X4.2 X4.3 X4.4 X 4.5 X 4.6 N

Frequency Table

X 1.4.1

X 1.4.2

X 1.4.3

Valid

Cumulative

Frequency

Percent

Percent

Percent

Valid

Total

X 1.4.4

Valid Cumulative

Percent Percent Valid

X 1.4.5

Valid Cumulative

Percent Percent Valid

X 1.4.6

Valid Cumulative

Percent Percent Valid

Frequency

Percent

5 38 0.54 0.54 1.00 Total

Frequencies

Statistics

X 1.5

X 5.1 X5.2 X5.3 X5.4 X 5.5 X 5.6 N

Frequency Table

X 1.5.1

X 1.5.2

X 1.5.3

Valid

Cumulative

Frequency

Percent

Percent

Percent

Valid

Total

X 1.5.4

Valid Cumulative

Percent Percent Valid

X 1.5.5

Valid Cumulative

Percent Percent Valid

X 1.5.6

Valid Cumulative

Percent Percent Valid

Frequency

Percent

5 34 0.49 0.49 1.00 Total

Frequencies

Statistics

X 6.1 X6.2 X6.3 X6.4 X 6.5 X 6.6 N

Frequency Table

X 2.1

X 2.2

X 2.3

Valid

Cumulative

Frequency

Percent

Percent

Percent

Valid

Total

X 2.4

Valid Cumulative

Percent Percent Valid

X 2.5

Valid Cumulative

Percent Percent Valid

X 2.6

Valid Cumulative

Percent Percent Valid

Frequency

Percent

5 37 0.53 0.53 1.00 Total

Frequencies

Statistics Y

X 6.1 X6.2 X6.3 X6.4 X 6.5 X 6.6 N

Frequency Table Y .1

Y .2

Y .3

Valid

Cumulative

Frequency

Percent

Percent

Percent

Valid

Total

Y .4

Valid Cumulative

Percent Percent Valid

Y .5

Valid Cumulative

Percent Percent Valid

Y .6

Valid Cumulative

Percent Percent Valid

Frequency

Percent

5 33 0.47 0.47 1.00 Total

Uji Reliabilitas

Reliability X1.1 Reliability X1.3 Scale: ALL VARIABLES

Scale: ALL VARIABLES

Case Processing Summary Case Processing Summary

N % Cases

70 100 Excluded a 0 0 Excluded a 0 0

70 100 a. Listwise deletion based on all variables in the procedure.

a. Listwise deletion based on all variables in the procedure.

Reliability Statistics Reliability Statistics

Cronbach's

Cronbach'

Alpha N of Items

N of Items 0.828

s Alpha

6 0.805

Reliability X1.2 Reliability X1.4 Scale: ALL VARIABLES

Scale: ALL VARIABLES

Case Processing Summary Case Processing Summary

N % Cases

Valid

70 100 Excluded a 0 0 Excluded a 0 0 Total

70 100 a. Listwise deletion based on all variables in the procedure.

70 100

Total

a. Listwise deletion based on all variables in the procedure.

Reliability Statistics Reliability Statistics

Cronbach's

Cronbach'

Alpha N of Items

N of Items 0.636

s Alpha

6 0.726

Reliability X1.5

Reliability Y

Scale: ALL VARIABLES Scale: ALL VARIABLES

Case Processing Summary Case Processing Summary

N % Cases

Valid

70 100 Excluded a 0 0 Excluded a 0 0 Total

70 100 a. Listwise deletion based on all variables in the procedure.

70 100

Total

a. Listwise deletion based on all variables in the procedure.

Reliability Statistics Reliability Statistics

Cronbach's

Cronbach'

Alpha N of Items

N of Items 0.681

s Alpha

6 0.616

Reliability X2 Scale: ALL VARIABLES

Case Processing Summary

Cases Valid

70 100

Excluded a 0 0

Total

70 100

a. Listwise deletion based on all variables in the procedure.

Reliability Statistics

Cronbach's Alpha

N of Items 0.736

Uji Regresi Linier Berganda

Regression

Descriptive Statistics

Std.

Deviation N Minat Pembelian

Mean

0.57261 70 Ulang Kualitas Pelayanan

0.42535 70 Perilaku Individu

Minat Pembelian

Mutu Perilaku

Pelayanan Konsumen Pearson

Ulang

Minat Pembelian 1 0.676 0.623 Correlation Ulang Kualitas Pelayanan

1 0.554 Perilaku Individu

0.554 1 Konsumen Sig. (1-

0 0 tailed)

Minat Pembelian

Ulang Kualitas Pelayanan

0 . Perilaku Individu

0 0 . Konsumen

N Minat Pembelian 70 70 70 Ulang Kualitas Pelayanan

70 70 70 Perilaku Individu

70 70 70 Konsumen

Variables Entered/Removed b

Variables

Model Variables Entered

Method 1 Perilaku Individu

Removed

. Enter Konsumen, Kualitas Pelayanan a

a. All requested variables entered. b. Dependent Variable: Minat Pembelian Ulang

Std. Error of Model

Adjusted R

R Square

Square

the Estimate

0.39178 a. Predictors: (Constant), Perilaku Individu Konsumen, Kualitas Pelayanan

1 .739 a 0.545

b. Dependent Variable: Minat Pembelian Ulang

ANOVA b

df Square F Sig. 1 Regression

Squares

2 6.17 40.2 .000 a Residual

a. Predictors: (Constant), Perilaku Individu Konsumen, Kualitas Pelayanan b. Dependent Variable: Minat Pembelian Ulang

Coefficients a

Standardize

Coefficient Model

Unstandardized

Coefficients

t Sig.

B Std. Error

a. Dependent Variable: Minat Pembelian Ulang

Statistics a

Std.

Deviation N Predicted

0.4229 70 Value Std.

0 1 70 Predicted Value Standard

0.029 70 Error of Predicted Value Adjusted

0.42335 70 Predicted Value Residual

0 0.985 70 Residual Stud.

1.015 70 Residual Deleted

1.63 -0.006

0.41026 70 Residual Stud.

1.059 70 Deleted Residual Mahal.

2.653 70 Distance Cook's

0.059 70 Distance Centered

0.038 70 Leverage Value

a. Dependent Variable: Minat Pembelian Ulang

NPar Tests

One-Sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test

Unstandardized Residual N

70 Normal

Mean

Parameters(a,b)

0.30411531 Most Extreme

Std. Deviation

0.092

-0.032 Kolmogorov-Smirnov Z

Negative

0.92 Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed)

0.379

a Test distribution is Normal.

b Calculated from data.

No Perusahaan Pengguna Jasa

2008 1 PT. Semen Gresik (Persero) Tbk

2007

57,696,569,759 66,317,896,275 2 PT. Varia Usaha

1,307,247,124 1,452,496,804 3 PT. Industri Kemasan Semen Gresik

265,530,885 291,792,181 4 PT. United Tractors Semen Gresik

120,327,853 130,791,145 5 PT. Cipta Nirmala

446,006,057 495,562,286 6 Dana Pensiun Semen Gresik

73,264,943 79,635,808 7 PT. Varia Usaha Bahari

133,297,449 144,888,532 8 PT. Ajinomoto

5,844,867,233 7,306,084,042 9 PT. Trans Pacific Petrochemical Indotama

1,021,539,051 1,110,368,534 10 PT. Salam Pacifik Indonesia Lines

453,535,878 492,973,780 11 PT. Santos Jaya Abadi

- - 12 Bank Mandiri

27,089,848 29,445,487 13 Bank BNI

168,495,898 183,147,716 14 Palang Merah Indonesia

- - Jumlah :

67,557,771,980 78,035,082,590 Omzet / Tahun ( Rp.)

No Perusahaan Pengguna Jasa

2009 1 PT. Semen Gresik (Persero) Tbk

2008

66,317,896,275 76,227,466,983 2 PT. Varia Usaha

1,452,496,804 1,578,800,874 3 PT. Industri Kemasan Semen Gresik

291,792,181 313,755,034 4 PT. United Tractors Semen Gresik

130,791,145 142,164,288 5 PT. Cipta Nirmala

495,562,286 550,624,762 6 Dana Pensiun Semen Gresik

79,635,808 86,560,661 7 PT. Varia Usaha Bahari

144,888,532 157,487,535 8 PT. Ajinomoto

7,306,084,042 7,941,395,697 9 PT. Trans Pacific Petrochemical Indotama

1,110,368,534 1,206,922,319 10 PT. Salam Pacifik Indonesia Lines

492,973,780 535,841,066 11 PT. Santos Jaya Abadi

- - 12 Bank Mandiri

29,445,487 32,005,964 13 Bank BNI

183,147,716 199,073,604 14 Palang Merah Indonesia

- - Jumlah :

78,035,082,590 88,972,098,787

No Perusahaan Pengguna Jasa Omzet / Tahun ( Rp.) 2009

2010 1 PT. Semen Gresik (Persero) Tbk

76,227,466,983 97,204,115,000 2 PT. Varia Usaha

1,578,800,874 1,716,087,907 3 PT. Industri Kemasan Semen Gresik

313,755,034 341,038,080 4 PT. United Tractors Semen Gresik

142,164,288 154,526,400 5 PT. Cipta Nirmala

550,624,762 611,805,291 6 Dana Pensiun Semen Gresik

86,560,661 94,087,675 7 PT. Varia Usaha Bahari

157,487,535 171,182,103 8 PT. Ajinomoto

7,941,395,697 8,631,951,845 9 PT. Trans Pacific Petrochemical Indotama

1,206,922,319 1,311,872,086 10 PT. Salam Pacifik Indonesia Lines

535,841,066 582,435,941 11 PT. Santos Jaya Abadi

- 342,766,449 12 Bank Mandiri

32,005,964 34,789,091 13 Bank BNI

199,073,604 216,384,352 14 Palang Merah Indonesia

- - Jumlah :

88,972,098,787 111,413,042,220 Omzet / Tahun ( Rp.)

No Perusahaan Pengguna Jasa

2011 1 PT. Semen Gresik (Persero) Tbk

2010

97,204,115,000 110,912,912,493 2 PT. Varia Usaha

1,716,087,907 2,424,656,195 3 PT. Industri Kemasan Semen Gresik

341,038,080 - 4 PT. United Tractors Semen Gresik

154,526,400 920,220,592 5 PT. Cipta Nirmala

611,805,291 637,229,879 6 Dana Pensiun Semen Gresik

94,087,675 105,280,798 7 PT. Varia Usaha Bahari

171,182,103 180,000,000 8 PT. Ajinomoto

8,631,951,845 9,788,209,268 9 PT. Trans Pacific Petrochemical Indotama

1,311,872,086 1,607,481,281 10 PT. Salam Pacifik Indonesia Lines

582,435,941 707,601,806 11 PT. Santos Jaya Abadi

342,766,449 312,444,734 12 Bank Mandiri

34,789,091 24,537,397 13 Bank BNI

216,384,352 571,186,203 14 Palang Merah Indonesia

- 150,983,674 Jumlah :

111,413,042,220 128,342,744,320