TEACHING- LEARNING PROCESS OF READING IN THE ELEVEN GRADE OF SMA PGRI SRAGEN Teaching- Learning Process Of Reading In The Eleven Grade Of SMA PGRI Sragen In 2011/ 2012 Academic Year.

TEACHING- LEARNING PROCESS OF READING
IN THE ELEVEN GRADE OF SMA PGRI SRAGEN
IN 2011/ 2012 ACADEMIC YEAR

RESEARCH PAPER

Submitted as a Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements
for Getting Bachelor Degree of Education
in English Department

by
Fitri Maedasari
A 320080136

SCHOOL OF TEACHER TRAINING AND EDUCATION
MUHAMMADIYAH UNIVERSITY OF SURAKARTA
2012

i

ii


ACCEPTANCE

iii

TESTIMONY

Herewith, I hereby that in this research paper, there is no plagiarism of the
previous literary work, and as far as I concern there is no work opinion that has been
written or published by some one else except the written references which are
referred in this paper and mentioned in the bibliography.
Therefore, if it is proven that there are some untrue statements in this
testimony, I will be fully responsible.

Surakarta, July 2012

Fitri Maedasari
A 320 080 136

iv


MOTTO

 Allah will not change the good condition of a
people as long as they do not change their
state of goodness themselves

Man Jadda Wa Jadda

v

DEDICATION

From the bottom of her heart, the writer would like to
dedicate this research paper to
 My beloved parents,
 My beloved sisters and brothers,
 My beloved best friends, and
 My lovely Tada.


vi

ACKNOLEDGMENT

Assalamu’alikum Wr. Wb.
First and foremost, the writer would like to say Alhamdulillahirobbil’aalamin
to Allah SWT, the Almighty, the Merciful, and compassionate so that the writer can
finish the research paper entitled “Teaching- learning Process of Reading in the
Eleven Grade of SMA PGRI Sragen in 2011/ 2012 Academic Year”.
The writer realizes that the research paper could not have been completed
without other people‟s help and contribution Therefore, on this opportunity she would
like to express her special and deepest gratitude and appreciation to:
1. Drs. H. Sofyan Anif, M. Si., as Dean of School of Teacher Training and
Education Faculty of Muhammadiyah University of Surakarta who has given
permission to write her research,
2. Titis Setyabudi, S. S, M. Hum as Head of English Department of School of
Teacher Training and Education,
3. The first consultant, Aryati Prasetyarini, S. Pd, M. Pd. who has given his great
help and guidance in finishing this research paper,
4. The second consultant, Dra. Dwi Haryanti, M. Hum, who has given correction

and suggestion,
5. All lecturers at English Department of Muhammadiyah University of
Surakarta for the useful knowledge and wisdom,

vii

6. The Academic advisor of class D/ „08 Drs. Sigit Haryanto, M Hum., who has
given correction and suggestion,
7. Her beloved parents, Alm Bapak Pardi and Ibu Warni, who have
given her financial support during her study in the English Department, thanks
for their love, endless prayer, best wishes support and everything during her
life, thrust her that she always tries do the best and to be a good daughter,
8. Her old sisters: Ninik and Lia and her old brother Budi and Bowo thanks
for your motivation and prayer,
9. Her cousin Habibi thanks for your cuteness,
10. All her friend in class D/ „08 , thanks for your friendship
11. Her best friends: Lila, Hezti, Reni, Iwin, Nicky, Septy, Trimo
12. Her special person Tada_Sweet who gives motivation, attention and love for
the writer to complete her paper and accompany the writer in lovely days,
13. Mr. S. Minanto, S. Pd., as a headmaster of SMA PGRI Sragen who has given

permission to conduct this research,
14. Mr. Eko Subono, S. Pd., as an English teacher of SMA PGRI Sragen who has
given the time to conduct this research,
15. All of the teachers of SMA PGRI Sragen, thanks for helping and kindness and
all of the students at the eleven grades in SMA PGRI Sragen thanks for the
participation.

viii

16. Muhammadiyah University of Surakarta librarian, without them the writer
would have difficulties in getting information for her research paper, and
17. The persons who can‟t be mentioned one by one toward their support for her
finishing her research.
Finally, nothing is perfect. The writer realizes that this research paper is far from
being perfect, therefore, the writer happily accepts constructive criticism in order to
make perfect.
Wa’alaikum salam Wr. Wb.
Surakarta, July 2012

The Writer


ix

TABLE OF CONTENT
page
TITLE ............................................................................................................

i

APPROVAL ..................................................................................................

ii

ACCEPTENCE ..............................................................................................

iii

TESTIMONY .................................................................................................

iv


MOTTO ..........................................................................................................

v

DEDICATION ................................................................................................

vi

ACKNOWLEDGMENT ...............................................................................

vii

TABLE OF CONTENT ................................................................................

viii

SUMMARY ....................................................................................................

xiii


CHAPTER I : INTRODUCTION ...............................................................

1

A. Background of the Study .............................................

1

B. Limitation of the Study ................................................

3

C. Problem Statement .......................................................

4

D. Objective of the Study ..................................................

4


E. Benefit of the Study ......................................................

5

F. Research Paper Organization .....................................

6

CHAPTER II: REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE ........................

7

A. Previous Study ................................................................

7

B. Notion Reading ..............................................................

8


C. Notion Teaching Reading .............................................

9

x

D. Principle of Teaching Reading .....................................

11

E. Technique of Teaching Reading ..................................

12

F. Method of Teaching Reading .......................................

13

G. Reading Evaluation .......................................................


16

H. Roles of Teacher ............................................................

18

I.

Roles of Student .............................................................

19

CHAPTER III: RESEARCH METHOD ....................................................

20

A. Type of Research ...........................................................

20

B. Place and Time ................................................................

21

C. Subject of Research .......................................................

21

D. Object of Research ........................................................

21

E. Data and Data Source.....................................................

21

F. Method of Collecting Data ...........................................

22

G. Technique of Analyzing Data .......................................

23

CHAPTER IV: RESEARCH FINDING AND DISCUSSION ..................

25

A. Research Finding ............................................................

25

1. Teaching- Learning Process of Reading in the Eleven
Grade of SMA PGRI Sragen ................................

25

2. Problems Faced by the Teacher and Students .....

39

3. Problems Solving by the Teacher ..........................

40

B. Discussion of Research Finding ....................................

42

CHAPTER V: CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTION ...............................

47

xi

A. Conclusion.........................................................................

47

B. Suggestion .........................................................................

49

BIBLIOGRAPHY ..........................................................................................

52

APPENDIX .....................................................................................................

54

xii

SUMMARY
Fitri Maedasari A 320 080 136. TEACHING- LEARNING PROCESS OF

READING IN THE ELEVEN GRADE OF SMA PGRI SRAGEN IN
2011/ 2012 ACADEMIC YEAR.
Research Paper. Muhammadiyah University of Ska. 2012
This research aims at describing the teaching learning process of reading at
the eleventh grades of SMA PGRI Sragen in 2011/ 2012 academic year, the problems
faced by the teacher and the students, and the problems solving by the teacher.
This research is a descriptive qualitative research. The researcher collected the
data by observing the teaching learning process of reading and conducting an
interview. The data are syllabus, field note, reading materials, and interview script.
The techniques of collecting data are observation, interview, and document. And the
techniques of analyzing data include reduction the data, display, and conclusion and
verification.
The result of the research shows that a) the objective of teaching reading is to
develop the reading skill and the students are able to read the meanings of written
hortatory exposition. b) the material is hortatory exposition. c) the materials are taken from
text book, namely Look a Head and students and LKS SIMPATI. d) the classroom activity is
BKF, MOT, JCT, ICT. e) reading techniques used by the teacher are pre reading, while
reading, and post reading. The methods used by the teacher are GTM and genre based
approach. f) the media used by the teacher is whiteboard, textbook, laboratory. g) evaluation
is conducted periodically per week, mid and final test. h) the roles of teacher are source of
learning, organizer, and evaluator. and the roles of the students are listener, performer, tutor.
i) the problems faced by he teacher are managing the class, time allotment. The problems
faced by the students are limitation vocabulary, low motivation, and heterogeneous class. 3)
The problems solving by the teacher are giving homework, suggesting the students to open
dictionary, and reviewing the materials.

xiii

Dokumen yang terkait

The Interest Of English Students Of Faculty Of Letters, In The University Of Sumatera Utara In Reading Literary Works

0 22 111

A Descriptive Study Of Vocabulary Achievement Through Pictures Of The Fifth Year Student Of SDN Gempolan Gurah Kediri In The 2003\2004 Academic Year.

0 5 62

THE EFFECT OF USING COMICS ON THE TENTH GRADE STUDENTS’ READING COMPREHENSION ACHIEVEMENT AT SMA PGRI 6 GENTENG BANYUWANGI

0 4 40

The Effectiveness Of Group Work In Reading Of Narrative Text (An Experimental In The Second Grade Of Ma. Al-Mukhlisin)

2 6 68

The Analysis Of The Reading Materials In “English Alive” Textbook Based On Schoolbased Curriculum For Second Grade Students Of Senior High School (Adescriptive Study Of Analysis Reading Materials In English Alive Textbook For The Second Grade Students Of

2 10 120

THE ROLE OF METACOGNITIVE LEARNING STRATEGIES IN STUDENTS’ READING COMPREHENSION AT FIRST GRADE OF SMA NEGERI 7 BANDAR LAMPUNG

0 12 51

IMPLEMENTING THE EXCLUSIVE LEARNING MODEL IN TEACHING READING COMPREHENSION AT THE FIRST GRADE OF SMA NEGERI 2 METRO

3 14 131

An Analysis Of Students’ Problems In Finding Main Idea Of Reading Text At The Second Grade Of Mtsn 1 Kotabumi

19 81 47

THE EFFECTIVENESS OF SCAFFOLDED READING EXPERIENCE IN TEACHING READING VIEWED FROM STUDENTS’ READING ANXIETY Aksendro Maximilian STKIP PGRI Bandar Lampung ABSTRACT - View of The Effectiveness of Scaffolded Reading Experience In Teaching Reading Viewed fro

0 0 17

The INFLUENCE Of GRANTING RELAXATION TECHNIQUES (BREATHING In) AGAINST THE LEVEL Of CONCENTRATION IN THE PROCESS OF LEARNING (Studies In MTs Riyadlatul Fallah 8

0 1 9