Board Governance And Firm's Performance (The Case of Banking Institution).

BOARD GOI'ET(A-.'ANCE ANI} FIRM'S PER'FORMAIICE
tThc Cra ofArtrkire tnrtituriotr)

Br:
SSERLY

sqbod

b

Pfti

I, Pf,RDANA

FunnrD4.i.; t&uodesdunc

DcF4ii6ou hc

2

diKr@uhb

Mjor e!rc6

(FoDn

1r

od effdde (A&ns sd

Mtu 16).

duhld i$ hd drb

c@nb aororE hrDils J !@t.

orD (cr Ahrs ft

$iqjoj

s3ors$hb}Nii,hs[.$

@nFq qbndns

ft *4 tui !

h!&s

d !tuh4 d!* sj$Lis {d

artuge er suoj!.

jot
^!!ro

(cry

a|,) oi

ed sed4s, reo od

rq 6iir

h oE treL

4!iy

pFtsini d o6ir Jicqh orc@d
Brcr aotr) 8dr ,re (Y.mek

md

CONCLIJSIONS AND LIMITATTON

.o[ot!dhy{EseshqldFl.iu]r

69sj@jnoiidE&

{hh60(FtrooDNgnswdbysg

lu\,ogiBiFilioli!{ebqdbukiE

FtromM(rotliFina

io

sd etu

r.rulienr{!$h),r

Bdwq NroDsqs
e aadrdtu .rdy6. pr tt te1

&.oq

Psbhns

ai

6l'&|o!olpuioE,Blqlhtelhd*tr]Lnqh
/d ,a*4g o.,ordb,q Bok

ror

h'mldotrr sd(@{K

&8drq,ts.N(iqt c