THE EFFECT OF STRATEGY OF TRAINING MODELS IN LEARNING ELECTRICAL INSTALLATION
Int. J. of GEOMATE, Month, Year, Vol.00, No.00 (Sl. No. 00), pp. 00-00
INTRODUCTION
Department of Electrical Engineering Faculty of Engineering State University of Padang, seeks to increase the quality of graduates of education today that leads to the mastery of both academic and professional competence. So the lecturing process plays an important role to equip graduates to be able to adapt to employment ".
State University of Padang (UNP) as one of the institution of higher education institution in Indonesia always strives to realize the national education function stated in Act on National Education System Number 20 Year 2003, that is to develop the ability and form the character and civilization of dignified nation in order to educate the life and organize the process education to produce educators who will participate to build the country through education.
20/2003 on National Education System emphasizes the autonomy of educational units, competency- based curriculum and paradigm shift from teaching to learning. The existence of paradigm shift from teaching to learning requires a more innovative learning pattern, giving priority to increase the potential of study subjects, learning facilities, and facilities and infrastructure. The establishment of student competence is an educational process that requires the involvement of various parties, among others, family, school / campus, work / industry, government and professional associations.
Associated with learning to improve student competence, curriculum development needs to be oriented to the world of work. Law No.
Student competence will be formed and developed through a learning process that uses student-centered, learning-oriented approaches and methods. This learning will provide a challenging and fun learning experience. Students are expected to use the in-depth approach and strategic approach to learning, not just learning to remember information or learn to graduate. Lessons that need to be developed by lecturers in the framework of the formation of competencies are interactions that enable students to build knowledge, attitudes and skills through various transformations of learning experience.
Education is a process of establishing qualified human resources. Improving the quality of education can only be achieved through improving the quality of the learning process which leads to improving the quality of educational outcomes. The realization of the government's efforts to prepare educational graduates in entering a challenging era of globalization is to apply an industry-minded curriculum.
The success rate of Indonesia's national development in all fields will depend on human resources as the nation's asset in optimizing and maximizing the development of all human resources. These efforts can be done and pursued through education, both through formal education and non- formal education channels. One institution on a formal education path that prepares its graduates to have excellence in the world of work and the Industrial world.
Keywords: Influence Strategy, Training Model, Learning Outcomes 1.
4
electrical installation courses in engineering majors of electrical engineering faculty of state universities of padang. The subjects of this study are students of electrical engineering education courses (S1) force 2016. Which consists of 55 people as an experimental class and 52 people as a control class. Assessment instruments using performance appraisal, and the data obtained were analyzed using two-tension test (t-test). From the results of data analysis showed that the class using the model training strategy has a higher average value when compared with students using conventional learning. Based on the calculation of t-test obtained t arithmetic> t table is 4.21255> 2.0042. Thus, the hypothesis in this study is that there is a significant influence of electrical electrical installation learning results in electrical engineering majors engineering faculty of state universities padang
Department of Electrical Engineering, Fakulty of Engineering, Universitas Negeri Padang Email: ABSTRACT: This study aimed to determine the effect of model training strategy on learning outcomes in
3 123
2 dan Oriza Candra
1 , Syamsuarnis
THE EFFECT OF STRATEGY OF TRAINING MODELS IN LEARNING ELECTRICAL INSTALLATION Elfizon
International Conference on Technical and Vocation Education and Training Padang : November 9-11, 2017
th
Therefore it is recommended to the lecturer as a learning facilitator able to package the lectures that motivate students to work in the business world / industry. Improvement of student learning outcomes in learning can be done with a variety of ways, one
Int. J. of GEOMATE, Month, Year, Vol.00, No.00 (Sl. No. 00), pp. 00-00
1 O
To determine whether there is a difference to the learning outcomes between the two classes of subjects, for normal and homogeneous distributed data, an average two-t test (s) using the formula Sudjana (2005: 241) is used. The t value of the calculated result is compared with the t value of the table. The provisions for acceptance of the research
3. Hypothesis test
Homogeneity test was conducted to find out whether the research data has the same variance. The homogeneity test of experimental class and control class is done using F test with the formula of Sudjana (2005: 249). Homogeneity testing criterion is if Fhitung <Ftabel means data have homogeneous variance, other wise if Fcount> Ftabel means data not homogeneous.
2. Homogeneity test
Normality test is used to determine the distribution of student learning outcomes, whether the data is normally distributed or not. Normality test is done by using chi-square test proposed by Riduwan (2006: 124). Criteria test normality, if ≤ then the data is normally distributed.
1. Normality test
After data collected conducted anilisa data. Prior to testing the research hypothesis, student learning outcomes must meet the requirements of normality test and homogeneity test:
The type of instrument used in this study is the assessment of performance. According to Depdiknas (2009: 14) "Performance assessment is an assessment done by observing the activities of learners in doing something". Validity in this research is content validity. Implementation Content validity is by arranging aspects to be assessed in the electrical installation courses according to the curriculum in the Department of Electrical Engineering FT UNP.
X1=Treatment with Training Models X2 = Conventional learning O1 = The results of the experimental O2 = Results of a control class performance assessment
2 Information:
2 O
4
1 X
X
Control
Class Treatment Result Experiment
This type of research is an experimental research that is categorized into quasi-experimental type. The research was conducted at the Department of Electrical Engineering Faculty of Engineering State University of Padang in Electrical Engineering Education Study Program S1 As the subject of research is the 3rd semester students of Electrical Engineering Education Study Program (S1) FT UNP which took the electrical installations totaling 107 people, consisting of two classes ie 2LA and 2LB. Where 2LA is an experimental class using Model Training strategy and 2LB is a control class that uses conventional learning. The determination of this class is done randomly from the existing class, this is done because the average score of student's GPA does not differ significantly. Thus, based on the t- test the two classes have the same initial capability. The research design used in this study is presented as follows: Table 1. Research Design
The method of investigation is the experimental method. This research consists of two classes namely control class and experiment class. In the experimental class in doing the learning in accordance with the procedure of model training strategy and on the control class is done by conventional learning.
The lesson uses the Training Model's strategy of 6 stages: (1) Submission of objectives, (2) Explanation of supporting materials, (3) Demonstration of performance, (4) Practice simulation, (5) Transfer Practices and (6) Industrial Visits. Problems occur above, the author tries to improve learning outcomes is by comparing the students learning outcomes between learning strategies Model dengan conventional, this is in accordance with the title of research that the authors do is Influence Strategy Model Training on the recovery of electrical installations in engineering majors Electrical Engineering Faculty State University Padang.
Learning Model Strategy Training will improve students' activity. Because in this strategy there is a demonstration or performance by lecturers before the students do lectures so that the students understand the procedure of doing the practice properly and correctly, the practice of diversion with the assignment of practical tasks that are more complex than the practical tasks taught so that students can develop an understanding of the material if linked to problems in the field or industry by giving the task of a visit to the industry so that students can match the lessons learned in school with the state of the field or the industry.
One of the learning strategies is learning model training strategy. Learning strategy Model Training is a strategy that focuses on job skills that are skills that involve all the senses, and are trained repeatedly in the form of organized and coordinated actions.
International Conference on Technical and Vocation Education and Training Padang : November 9-11, 2017 of them with the application of effective learning strategies.
th
2. RESEARCH METHODS
Int. J. of GEOMATE, Month, Year, Vol.00, No.00 (Sl. No. 00), pp. 00-00
4
th
International Conference on Technical and Vocation Education and Training Padang : November 9-11, 2017 hypothesis are: a. Ho accepted if t count <ttabel and Ha rejected.
b. Ho is rejected if thitung> ttabel and Ha accepted.
3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Data Description
Class Amount Result
is 1.389 and Ftable value in experiment class and control class with dk
Based on the normality test and homogeneity test of the final test variant it was found that the two classes were normally distributed and had homogeneous variance, so t test was used to see the difference between the two classes. From the calculation results obtained tcount = 3.62, and the
c. Hypothesis test
means that both classes have a homogeneous variance.
table
<F
count
= 22 is 2.04 at significance level of 0.05. Thus F
denominator
= 23 and dk
numerator
hitung
Experiment (2LA) Control (2LB)
Test homogeneity to see whether the two classes are homogeneous or not. Based on calculation results obtained F
b. Homogeneity Test
This research was conducted in semester July - December 2017 Academic Calendar State University of Padang. The implementation of the research consists of 6 lecture meetings that include; Design of Electric Installation of Sedehana House, Electricity Installation of Multi-storey Home, Maintenance and Maintenance of Electrical Installation. Based on the result of the research, it is found that the average value () of the students' experimental learning result is higher than the control class as can be seen in table 2 Table 2. Average and Percentage Completion of Experiment and Control Class
Differences in learning outcomes were analyzed using t-test by first looking at whether the subject was normally distributed and had a homogeneous variant. Therefore tested normality and homogeneity test.
Data Analysis The data analysis here is done manually.
Figure 1. Graph of Experiment and Control Class From the graph the difference in the mean values of the two classes taught. Where the experimental class (2LA) obtained an average value of 85.5, while for control class (2LB) taught by conventional methods obtained an average value of 81.4.
Strategy Training model is essentially a strategy that can facilitate students in the lecture so that students become skilled. By using the strategy Training model requires students to work in stages and structured, which includes: the preparation stage, demonstration, imitation, and practice. The following is the normal curve of the experimental class and control class as follows:
Based on the description and analysis of data that has been done on student learning outcomes on electrical installation learning through learning model training in the experimental class and conventional learning on the electronics engineering education faculty of Universitas Negeri Padang, there are differences in learning outcomes between the experimental class and the control class. This difference can be seen from the highest value of the experimental class 96 with an average of 85.5, while the control grade is at a high of 89 with an average of 81.41. Thus, it can be stated that the students 'learning outcomes in the experimental class is higher than the students' learning outcomes of the control class.
Strategy Training model is essentially a strategy that can facilitate students in the lecture so that students become skilled. By using the strategy Training model requires students to work in stages and structured, which includes: the preparation stage, demonstration, imitation, and practice.
52 85,5 81,3
55
a. Normality test Based on the calculation results in the experimental class at can = 6.37 and control class at can = 0.908. While for both classes at significance level with α = 0,05, got = 9,488. It can be concluded that the data obtained from the two classes is normally distributed.
Int. J. of GEOMATE, Month, Year, Vol.00, No.00 (Sl. No. 00), pp. 00-00
Bandung: Alfabeta. [11] Singgih Santoso. 2009. Panduan Lengkap
tidak diterbitkan. Padang: UNP [5] Kementerian Pendidikan Nasional. 2011. Buku
Panduan Penulisan Tugas Akhir/Skripsi Universitas Negeri Padang . Padang: Kemenas.
[6] Made Wena. 2008. Strategi Pembejalajaran Inovatif Kontemporer .Jakarta: Bumi Aksara. [7] Nana Sudjana. 2005. Dasar-dasar proses belajar mengajar . Bandung: Sinar Baru Algesindo. [8] Nana Sudjana. 2005. Methode Statistika.
Bandung: Tarsito [9] Oemar Hamalik. 2004. Proses Belajar
Mengajar . Jakarta: Bumi Aksara
[10] Riduwan. 2006. Belajar Mudah Penelitian Untuk Guru, Karyawan dan Penelitia Pemula.
Menguasai Statistik dengan SPSS 17 . Jakarta:
[1] Ahmad Sabri. 2006. Strategi belajar Mengajar & Micro Teaching. Jakarta: Quantum Teaching. [2] Depdiknas.2008. Pengembangan Perangkat Penilaian Psikomotor . Jakarta: Gramedia. [3] Direktorat pembinaan SMA. juknis penyusunan perangkat penilaian psikomotor di sma. http://teguhsasmitosdp1.files.wordpress.com/- juknis-penyusunan-perangkat-penilaian- psikomotor-_isi- revisi__0104.pdf[04/2/2013]. [4] Hermawati. 2012. Efektifitas Model
Gramedia Suharsimi Arikunto.2006. Prosedur
Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktik . Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
[12] Sastriadi. 2013. Model Pembelajaran
konvensional . /2013/01.
[13] Wina Sanjaya. 2006. Strategi Pembelajaran Beroientasi Standar Proses Pendidikan .
Jakarta : Kencana.
Pembelajaran Berbasis Proyek Terhadap Hasil Belajar Psikomotor Siswa Kelas X TITL pada Mata Diklat IPBB di SMKN 1 Batipuh . Skripsi
5.
REFERENCES4
table
th
International Conference on Technical and Vocation Education and Training Padang : November 9-11, 2017 value of t
table
= 2.0157. Thus t
acount
> t
, then Ho is rejected and also receive Ha. It can be concluded that there are significant differences in student learning outcomes that apply the strategy of Model Training with the conventional learning model in the electrical engineering practice course on the students of Electrical Engineering Education (S1) Program of Electrical Engineering Faculty of Engineering Universitas Negeri Padang.
It is expected that FT-UNP Leaders, especially lecturers to always try to improve student's learning achievement and foster self- reliance learning so as to complete the study on time with good achievement quality. For the next researcher, it is suggested that the factors that influence the learning achievement are included as part of the research so that the research result is more objective.
Discussion
Based on the results of data analysis there are significant differences in student learning outcomes that apply the strategy of Model Training with the conventional learning model in Electrical Installation courses in the lectures of undergraduate students (S1) majoring in Electrical Engineering Faculty of Engineering, State University of Padang. Where the application of Strategy Strategy Model Training scores higher than students who are taught conventionally.
This is because the Model Training strategy is able to generate student motivation in learning, so that students are more motivated to improve their learning achievement. Model Strategy Training is a strategy that teaches how to bring students to learn and teach. The atmosphere of training means, not to bring students to the industrial world with sophisticated equipment.
But how the industry trains newly skilled employees is imitated by the strategy of the Model Training Program consists of five main models: 1) work instructions, 2) work methods, 3) employment relations, 4) work safety, 5) program development. All these programs are used to support the success of learning in the course. Application of learning strategy of Model Training in Electric Installation lecture able to increase student motivation in lecture. This is seen with the seriousness of students in doing all jobshet at every lecture meeting.
Based on data analysis and discussion, it can be concluded that the learning motivation mahasisawa using Model Training strategy is better than conventional learning. This can be seen from the learning result obtained by the students who apply the strategy of the Training model is higher than the class that takes the conventional model. Thus there are differences in learning outcomes are significant between the application of training models on electrical installation lectures with conventional learning on students Electrical Engineering Education Studies (S1) Faculty of
Engineering Universitas Negeri Padang
Suggestions
4. CONCLUSION Conclusion
4
th
International Conference on Technical and Vocation Education and Training Padang : November 9-11, 2017
SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT OF CONCENTRATION SELECTION WITH INTEREST TEST BASED ON INTELLIGENT SYSTEM
Elin Haerani Information Technology UIN Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau
Jl. H.R. Soebrantas No.155 KM 15 Simpang Baru Panam, Pekanbaru, Indonesia
ABSTRACT : Universities are designed to prepare graduates who are ready to enter the workforce and are able
to develop a professional attitude. Educational institutions such as the University need a form of decisions in determining the right concentration for students, so that the learning process can be achieved well in accordance with the interests. The decision is very influential on the process of handling the choice of alternative concentration, choosing an appropriate concentration of interest will also have an impact on the research focus for the final assignment of students. To know the right concentration for students is not easy, because of the limited information possessed by students. This research develops student concentration selection system in Electrical Engineering Department UIN Suska Riau. The system was developed with three ktiteria, ie, interest tests using psychological tests, prerequisite concentration course grades, and GPA. The system is built using an intelligent system model that is Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Decision Making (FMADM) web-based, which helps the Department in the selection process and helps the process of career guidance on students. With this selection system, the Department can be provide the most suitable concentration decisions with interest in student concentration.
Keyword : Concentration, Interest, Intelligent, Career Guidance, Decision 1.
INTRODUCTION
Interests are a source of motivation that encourages a person to do what one wants if the person is given the freedom to choose (Elisabeth B. Hurlock, 1999). Interest is also a tendency of a person's general behavior to be attracted to a certain group of things (Guilford in Munandir, 1997). Learning or working in areas that match the skills and interests, will bring motivation in studying or living it. Developing an interest is aimed at getting people to learn well and in the future able to work in a field that suits their abilities and interests so they can develop the capability to learn and work optimally with great enthusiasm. Related to the importance of choosing majors in accordance with the interests, which is one way to help the process of career counseling to students at the university. Career guidance is the most important thing to direct students according to their interests and potential. The selection of the right career in the students, will give satisfaction and will achieve maximum results.
University are part of vocational education developed in Indonesia, designed to prepare students or graduates who are ready to enter the workforce and are able to develop a professional attitude in the vocational field. University graduates, are expected to be productive individuals who are able to work as a manpower and have the readiness to face work competition. In accordance with the provisions set forth in the National Standard of Higher Education (SN
DIKTI) in 2014, each study program shall be supplemented with learning achievement targets (Belmawa, 2015). Educational institutions such as the University often require a form of decision in determining the appropriate concentration for the students so as to achieve good learning in accordance with student interests.
The decision is very influential on the process of handling alternative concentrations to be selected, choosing an appropriate concentration of interest will also have an impact on the research focus for the final assignment of the students. But to know the right concentration is not an easy thing, because of limited information owned by students. The various constraints in determining the concentration according to the criteria will confuse the students. According to Sutejo, et al (2012), in the process of selection of competence skills can affect the success of students at the time of study at the University and after graduation later.
In the selection process of determining the concentration in the Department of Electrical Engineering which acts as a decision-making is the Chief of the Department, the person acting as the decision maker performs comparisons on several alternatives, including evaluating the calculations. The process of choosing a concentration at the Department of Electrical UIN Suska Riau today, is done by conventional method where the selection process is carried out with some administrative requirements by looking at student value attachment or transcript. Some technical problems that often occur is the first, in the implementation
4
4. Perform the ranking process by multiplying the normalized matrix (R) with the weight value (W).
1. Determining the criteria that will be used as a reference in decision making, namely Ci. The criteria included in this research report are 3 as follows:
The SAW (Simple Additive Weighting) method is often also known as the weighted summing method. The basic concept of the SAW method is to find the weighted sum of performance ratings on each alternative on all attributes. The SAW method requires the process of normalizing the decision matrix (X) on a scale that can be compared with all the alternative ratings available. The steps are:
Simple Additive Weighting Method (SAW).
d. Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP)
e.
Ideal Solution (TOPSIS)
c. Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to
Weighted Product (WP)
b.
ELECTREThere are several methods that can be used to solve FMADM problems. Among others (Kusumadewi, 2006):
a.
5. Determine the preference value for each alternative (Vi) by summing the product of the normalized matrix (R) with the weight value (W). A larger value of Vi indicates that Ai's alternatives are preferred. (Kusumadewi, 2007).
3. Normalize the matrix by calculating the normalized performance rating (rij) value of the alternative Ai on the attribute Cj based on the equation adjusted to the type of attribute (attribute benefit = MAXIMUM or cost attribute / cost = MINIMUM). If the attribute is a gain, the crisp (Xij) value of each attribute column is divided by the crisp MAX (MAX Xij) value of each column, while for the cost attribute, the MIN crisp (MIN Xij) value of each attribute column is divided by the crisp value (Xij) each column.
th
2. Provide weight value (W) which is also obtained based on crisp value.
Give each alternative value (Ai) on each criterion (Cj) that has been determined, where the value is obtained based on crisp value; i = 1,2, ... m and j = 1,2, ... n.
Whereas in the objective approach, the weight value is calculated mathematically so that it ignores the subjectivity of the decision maker. The Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Making algorithm is: 1.
According to Kusumadewi (2007), Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Decision Making (FMADM) is a method used to find the optimal alternative of a number of alternatives with certain criteria. The core of FMADM is to determine the weight value for each attribute, then proceed with the ranking process that will select the alternatives already given. Basically there are 3 approaches to finding attribute weight value, that is subjective approach, objective approach and integration approach between subjective & objective. Each approach has its advantages and disadvantages. In the subjective approach the weighting value is determined by the subjectivity of the decision makers, so that several factors in the alternative ranking process can be determined freely.
Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Decision Making (FMADM)
This study aims to develop a concentration selection system of students in the Department of Electricity UIN Suska Riau with interest tests, using an intelligent system model that is Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Decision Making (FMADM). Interest tests are used for students as a guide in choosing concentrations, the system is expected to assist the Department in the selection process and can help the Student Guidance Counseling process, and can provide concentration decisions that best suit the interests of the students.
The purpose of the specialization itself is explained in the guidance of specialization issued by the Ministry of Education and Culture of the Republic of Indonesia (May, 2013) which can be described that the service of student's interest is part of the advocacy effort and facilitate the development of learners to actively develop their potential to have spiritual spiritual power , self- control, personality, intelligence, noble character, and skills needed by him, society, nation and state (direction of Article 1 number 1 of Law Number 20 Year 2003 on National Education System) so as to achieve optimal development. Optimal development is not limited to achievement in accordance with the intellectual capacity and interests it has, but as a condition of development that allows learners to make choices and decisions in a healthy and responsible and have a high adaptability to the dynamics of life it faces.
The second problem is the lack of guidance to students in choosing the right concentration for themselves.
International Conference on Technical and Vocation Education and Training Padang : November 9-11, 2017 of the selection process will take time in the process because it is still done manually. In addition, the selection process is also vulnerable to errors and obstacles in reporting results that can impact on the stage of announcement of results.
II. LITERATURE REVIEW A.
th
4 International Conference on Technical and Vocation Education and Training Padang : November 9-11, 2017
Tabel 1-1 Criteria Information:
r_ij : Normalized performance rating value x_ij : The attribute value that belongs to each KRITERIA KETERANGAN criterion
C1 Interest Test Max〖x_ij〗: The largest value of each criterion prerequisite Min〖x_ij〗: The smallest value of each criterion
C2 concentration course Benefit : If the greatest value is best grades cost : If the smallest value is best
The final result is obtained from the ranking C3 GPA process that is the sum of the normalized matrix multiplication R with the weight vector to obtain
2. Determine the match rating of each alternative the largest value chosen as the best alternative (Ai) on each criterion. That is after determining the as the solution. (Kusumadewi, 2006). The criteria that are used as guidelines for weighting preference value for each alternative (Vi) is given and determine some alternatives to be processed
( = ∑
=1
where each alternative has a value corresponding to The largest value of Vi indicates that Ai's the criteria. Here are the match rate tables of each alternatives are preferred. alternative on each criteria:
Tabel 1-2 Rating Matches Any Alternative B.
Measurements and Psychological Tests Kriteria
Alternatif Interest tests are a type of test instrument
C1 C2 C3 used in assessing individual interests in different A1 X11 X12 X13 types of activities (Chaplin, 2000). Much of interest A2 X21 X22 X23 inventory is designed to estimate individual A3 X31 X32 X33 interests in various occupations. A number of A4 X41 X42 X43 inventories also provide an analysis of interest in
Bobot (W) W1 W2 W3 the educational curriculum or field of study, which in turn is related to career decisions. Then create a decision matrix from the match table:
The identification of students' direction of interest can be done with both test and non test
11 12 13
approaches. A test approach is usually done using
21 22 23
standard instruments such as psychological tests
X = 31 32 33 that we know. While the non-test approach is based
on data from non-standard instruments, such as
41 42 43
academic achievement, observation, interview,
( 1 2 3 ) questionnaire, etc.
Psychological measurement is the
3. Make a decision matrix based on criteria (Ci), measurement of visible aspects of behavior, which then normalize the matrix based on the equation are considered to reflect the achievements, talents, that is adjusted to the type of attribute (attribute attitudes and other aspects of personality (T. Raka gain or cost attribute) so obtained normalized
Joni, 1977). In practice, psychological matrix R. measurements generally use many tests as a tool. The term psychological test is a tool for investigating the reaction or disposition of a person
( ) Max on the basis of his behavior. Thus the notion of psychological measurements and psychological
= tests are essentially the same. Its foundation lies in the process and its tools used as the basis for the
( ) use of the term in practice. { }
C. Various Scale In Psychology (Ordinal Scale) With rij is the normalized performance rating of the
Ordinal scale occurs when the objects that alternative Ai on the attribute Cj; i = 1,2, ..., m and exist in one category of a scale not only different j = 1,2, ..., n. So the R is obtained as follows: from those objects, but also have a relationship with each other. The usual relationships we
11 12 13 encounter among classes are: higher, more 21 22 23 favorable, more frequent, more difficult, more
= 31 32 33 mature and so on 41 42 3
Ordinal measurement scale provides ( ) information about the relative number of different th
4 International Conference on Technical and Vocation Education and Training Padang : November 9-11, 2017 characteristics possessed by a particular object or
III.
RESEARCH METHODOLOGYindividual. This level of measurement has nominal- scale information coupled with a certain relative
Identification of Predecessor Start Data collection problems Research
means of ranking that provides information on whether an object has more or less characteristics
Formulation of but not how many flaws and strengths. the problem
Measurements made on an ordinal scale are objects distinguished according to their equations
Analysis
and in order. So can be made a sequence or a complete and regular rankings delivered classes.
Interest test
Ordinal scale is a scale that is the second level of measure, which is tiered something that
System analysis
becomes 'more' or 'less' than others, this measure is
Requirement Data
used to sort objects from the lowest to the highest
Score value Prerequisite of concentration
and vice versa which means researchers have made
selection
measurements on the variables studied. Example: measure sports championships, work performance, Analysis of FMADM method with SAW seniority of employees. For example: Answer
Function Requirement Analysis
questions such as rank: strongly disagree, disagree,
Functional Analysis
neutral, agree and strongly agree can be symbolized
Data Flow Diagram (DFD)
numbers 1, 2,3,4 and 5. These numbers are only a symbol of ranking, not expressing the number. Entity Relationship Diagram (ERD) The Ordinal scale is higher than the nominal scale, and is often also called the rank scale. This is because on an ordinal scale, the symbols of the number of measurements other than indicating the distinction also indicate the order or degree of the
System planning Implementasi Implementation Limitations Database Design
object as measured by certain characteristics [6]. For example the level of satisfaction of a person to
Operational Environment Display Design PHP Programming Menu Structure
the product. Can we give a number with 5 = very
MySQL
satisfied, 4 = satisfied, 3 = less satisfied, 2 = not Interface satisfied and 1 = very dissatisfied. Or for example
Interface Implementation in a race, the winner is ranked 1,2,3 etc.
On an ordinal scale, unlike the nominal
Testing
scale, when we want to change the numbers, it Finish Blackbox dan user Conclusions and recommendations must be done sequentially from large to small or
acceptance test
from small to large. So, should not be made 1 = very satisfied, 2 = not satisfied, 3 = satisfied dstnya.
1) Design of Data Subsystem
Allowable is 1 = very satisfied, 2 = satisfied, 3 = This stage is the design of the analysis of the less satisfied etc. previous data management subsystem. This
In addition, the need to consider the stage of the sculpting context diagrams, data characteristics of ordinal scale is that although the flow diagrams and entity relationship diagrams. value already has a clear limit but not yet have a And next will be made data dictionary design. distance (difference). We do not know what
2) Design Subsystem Model distance the satisfaction from the unsatisfied to the
This stage is the result of model analysis that is less satisfied. In other words too, although very the method used in making the system. At this satisfied we give 5 and very unsatisfied we give the stage will be made a model design in the form number 1, we can not say that satisfaction is very of flowchart system and flowchart calculation satisfied five times higher than the very FMADM method of the process of determining dissatisfied. the ranking of alternative priority sequence. Just as on a nominal scale, on an ordinal
3) Design of Dialog Subsystem scale we also can not apply standard (arithmetic)
This stage is the result of the analysis of the mathematical operations such as subtraction, dialog management subsystem. This stage will addition, multiplication, and others. Statistical generate a design menu structure and interface equipments that correspond to ordinal scales are design (interface) system. also statistical tools based on numbers and proportions such as mode, frequency distribution, Chi Square and some other non-parametric statistical equipment. th
4 International Conference on Technical and Vocation Education and Training Padang : November 9-11, 2017
The implementation of this system is
IV. ANALYSIS AND DESIGN SYSTEM divided into two components, namely hardware
and software, the following is the operational Context diagram used to describe the work environment used in the implementation of the process of a system in general. DFD level 0 or system: diagram context is depicted in Figure 4.1
a. Hardware below: Processor: Intel Pentium Dual CPU 1.86 GHz Memory (RAM) : 1.00 GB System Type : 32 bits
b. Software Operating System : Windows 8 Programming Language: PHP DBMS : MySQL Tools : Sublime Text Web Browser :Mozilla Firefox
Users are divided into 3 namely the head of the department, admin majors and students. Administrator (head of department and admin) has full access rights to system, can add, change and delete master data and can see student test result report.
Figure 4.1 Context diagram Students can only test interest only. Beforeaccessing the system Students must first fill the Menu Structure Design, The design goal is data to get login permissions. To Fill student to create a design guide at the implementation bios with the way to start the test. stage of the design design of the system to be 1.
Home View built. Menu structure of decision support system Before accessing the system Admin must login of majors selection can be seen in Figure 4.2 first, input username and password. After Login below: will appear Home Page As Next:
Pengembangan Model Seleksi Pemilihan Konsentrasi Jurusan Teknik Elektro UIN Suska
Data Master Data Mahasiswa Perhitungan Hasil Akhir Keluar (FMADM - SAW)
Data Pengguna
Figure 5.1 Home ViewData Kriteria Data Konsentrasi
Figure 4.2 Menu Structure DesignIV. IMPLEMENTATION AND TESTING
Implementation stage is a condition where the system has been analyzed and designed
Figure 5.2 administrators Menuready to be operated under the actual conditions, from this stage of implementation
Figure 5.2 is a view for administrators, will know the success rate of analysis andadministrators can process test data of interest design on the system to be built. and students. On the administrator page
4
on the Submenu of Calculation and Ranking The results can be seen by the student and concentration rankings that best match the interest of the student.
c.
The system may also recommend concentrations for students based on areas of expertise of interest.
b.
Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Decision Making method with Simple Additive Weighting has been built and is able to provide quick decisions to determine the best course for students.
After completing several stages of research in establishing a system of concentration selection in this department of electrical engineering, some conclusions can be drawn: a. the concentration selection system in this electrical engineering department using the
VI. Conclusions
2. User Acceptance Test is a system testing process given to the user with the aim to generate a conclusion whether the system has been developed is acceptable by the user or not. If the test results (testing) already meet the needs of users, it means that the system has been developed in accordance with the understanding and needs of end users (end users). Testing using the user acceptance test technique is done by giving some questions about the function and work system according to the user. In this test taken some users who act as respondents who then given some questions in the form of questionnaires.
1. Blackbox is an application that has been designed and built in accordance with the wishes in terms of appearance and in terms of accuracy of data calculation process. How to test the look of this application is to call the form or display of each application process and test the correctness of the process done, whether it has been in accordance with the design made earlier. Blackbox testing is done with various tests such as menus, input, and buttons.
The purpose of testing is to look for errors or errors in accordance with the criteria set, the benefits of this test is that if the system is used no errors or no problems, which in essence this application in accordance with the design and built based on the analysis described previously. There are two ways of testing that will be done that is testing the application view or using Blackbox and testing with User Acceptance Test.
Figure 5.3 Results Calculation and Rankingth
Sub-menu of Results Calculation and Ranking :
On the Student Data Submenu, a menu to manage student data, by first selecting the desired year and semester. Administrators can fill in MK Value, IPK Value such as add, view, modify, and delete. The administrator can see the Student Interest Value derived from the interest test process that has been done by the student. Administrators can perform the ranking process to see the student grade ratings. Below will show the various processes that have been described above in the form of images.