Manajemen | Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Maritim Raja Ali Haji joeb.83.1.19-26
Journal of Education for Business
ISSN: 0883-2323 (Print) 1940-3356 (Online) Journal homepage: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/vjeb20
Service Learning: Applications and Research in
Business
Christine P. Andrews
To cite this article: Christine P. Andrews (2007) Service Learning: Applications and Research in
Business, Journal of Education for Business, 83:1, 19-26, DOI: 10.3200/JOEB.83.1.19-26
To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.3200/JOEB.83.1.19-26
Published online: 07 Aug 2010.
Submit your article to this journal
Article views: 116
View related articles
Citing articles: 19 View citing articles
Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at
http://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=vjeb20
Download by: [Universitas Maritim Raja Ali Haji]
Date: 11 January 2016, At: 23:01
Downloaded by [Universitas Maritim Raja Ali Haji] at 23:01 11 January 2016
ServiceLearning:Applicationsand
ResearchinBusiness
CHRISTINEP.ANDREWS
FLORIDAGULFCOASTUNIVERSITY
FORTMYERS,FLORIDA
ABSTRACT.Researchershavedescribed
servicelearningasanidealwaytointegrate
experientialeducationintocoursework
whilemeetingcommunityneedsandimbuingstudentswithcivicresponsibility.They
haveadvocatedservicelearninginbusiness
asamethodtoimplementcourseconcepts
andincreasestudentunderstandingofthe
externalenvironment.Inthisarticle,the
authorbrieflysummarizesinstitutionaland
programcharacteristicsthatareassociated
withsuccessfulservice-learningprograms.
Shereviewsresearchpublicationsrelated
toservice-learningimplementationsin
business.Theauthorfoundthatthefields
ofinformationsystems,management,and
marketinghavemoreservice-learning
applicationstiedtocourse-earningobjectivesthanhavethefieldsofaccountingand
finance.Further,shesuggeststhatservice
learningmayfitbestinbusinesscourses
whereskilledinteractionwithusersisakey
learninggoal.
Keywords:businesseducation,management,servicelearning
Copyright©2007HeldrefPublications
R
esearchers endorse integration of
servicelearning(SL)intohigher
education as a way to improve the relevance of education and address community needs (Zlotkowski, 1996). SL
is increasingly applied in business disciplines. However, assimilating structural changes in the curriculum is not
easy, and an examination of related
research reveals institutional and programcharacteristicsthatareassociated
withsuccessfulSLimplementations.In
addition,SLapplicationsarenotfound
evenly across all disciplines in business.Inthisarticle,Ibrieflysummarize
institutional and program characteristics that are associated with successful SL programs and review published
researchrelatedtoSLimplementations
in business, focusing on the discipline,
course,andparticularSLapplication.I
concludewithsuggestionsaboutwhere
SL implementation may fit best in a
businesscurriculum.
SL has a broad basis of support in
the United States. The presidents of
Brown University, Stanford University,
GeorgetownUniversity,andtheEducation Commission of the United States
startedCampusCompactinaneffortto
createserviceopportunitiesforstudents
andaddresstheperceivedmoraldecline
of college students (Morton &Troppe,
1996). Campus Compact and its Project on Integrating Service With Academic Study has grown from an initial
membership of 23 schools in 1985 to
over 1,000 two-year and four-year collegesanduniversitiesatthepresenttime
(CampusCompact,2006).SLeducators
useexperientialeducationthatengages
students in a curriculum connected to
theircommunity.
Combining community service and
academic courses and successfully
accomplishing service goals while
achieving learning outcomes is challenging, particularly in undergraduate
businesscourseswhosecurriculumcontentisfrequentlytechnicalandstandardized.Integrationintobusinesscurricula
isalsochallengingbecauseinstitutions’
achievementofacademicgoalsiscriticaltomaintainingtheirbusinessaccreditation and enabling them to succeed
with the requisite technical skills in
placing students in professional positions.Accomplishmentofservicegoals
can come at the sacrifice of learning
outcomes and vice versa. The authors
ofstudiesreferredtointhisarticlefrequentlyoffercreativestrategiesforintegrating SL into business curricula and
accomplishingcoursegoals.
InstitutionalandProgram
Characteristics
Theoretical research can be related
to institutional characteristics, instructionalmethods,personaldevelopment,or
academic outcomes in SL. Institutional
September/October2007
19
Downloaded by [Universitas Maritim Raja Ali Haji] at 23:01 11 January 2016
TABLE1.PublicationsonConceptualandGeneralBusinessService
Learning(SL)
Authors
Year
Organization
Godfrey,Illes,&
Berry
2005
BrighamYoung
University
IllustrateshowSLbroadens
businesseducation,focusing
onitsholistic,problemsolvingnature.
Godfrey
1999
BrighamYoung
University
Makesanargumentfor
compassionatecitizenry.
Kolenkoetal.
1996
KennesawState
College,Rutgers
University,
UniversityofWest
Florida,Marymount
ManhattanCollege
Analyzescurriculumissues,
barriers,andfacultyissues
relatedtoteachingSL.
Lambetal.
1998
MontanaState
University
DescribesSLintegration
throughout4-yeareducation.
Lesteretal.
2005
Universityof
Wisconsin–Eau
Clair,Simmons
Schoolof
Management
Usesempiricaldatato
evaluateSLforstudents,
recruiters,andcommunity
byusingstructuralequation
modeling.
Papamarcos
2002
St.John’s
University
Advocatestheuseof
team-basedprojectsinSL
forclientorganizations
illustratingkeypeople,project,andprocessissues.
Papamarcos
2005
St.John’s
University
Reexaminesexperiential
learningadvocatinguniversity–communitypartnerships
andstudentleadership.
McCarthy&
Tucker
2002
Universityof
Baltimore,Ohio
University
Usesempiricaldatato
measurethelikelihoodof
involvementincommunity
serviceafterparticipationin
SLinbusinessclasses.
Morton&Troppe
1996
ProvidenceCollege,
CampusCompact
Providence
ProvideshistoryofSLand
discussionofeffectsonstudentvalues.
Ramaetal.
2000
TexasA&M
International
University,IowaState
University,Wolcott
LynchAssociates,
BentleyCollege
Summarizesacademicand
personalstudentSLoutcomesandhowaccounting
researcherscancontribute.
Salimbeneetal.
2005
BentleyCollege
DescribesBentley’sService
LearningCenter,theirAllianceforEthicsandSocial
Responsibility,andSLintegration.
Taylor
2005
Universityof
Missouri
InterviewsexperiencedSL
expertswhohaveinsights
basedonresearchand
experience.
Zlotkowski
1996
BentleyCollege
AdvocatesuseofSLto
broadenstudentperspectives
andincreaseunderstanding
ofexternalenvironment.
20
JournalofEducationforBusiness
Comment
characteristics refer to dimensions of
theinstitutionthatpromoteorinhibitthe
integration of service learning. Instructional methodology refers to characteristics of SL implementation related to
programmatic features that support the
achievementoflearningoutcomes,butI
donotaddressthatissueinthisarticle.
Researchers liken building an
engaged campus to a maturation process (AmericanAssociation for Higher
Education[AAHE],2004)thatinvolves
not only developing a shared language
and shared learning but also building
infrastructure, expanding collaboration, instituting policies, and assessing effects. Implementation of SL into
universities broadly takes one of three
forms including (a) implementation
by course section, (b) creation of an
officeofSL,or(c)formationofanSL
consortium (Strand, Marullo, Cutforth,
Stoecker,&Donohue,2003).
Lamb, Swinth, Vinton, and Lee
(1998) attributed much of the resistance to the successful integration of
SLtotheabsenceofinfrastructurefor
sustainingserviceefforts.Theypointed out that the operational aspects
of SL, including identifying and nurturing agency connections, assisting
faculty with designing activities, and
assisting students, require infrastructure and financial commitment from
theinstitution.
In a presentation to the National
Service Learning Conference, Andrew
Furco(2004)fromtheServiceLearning
Research and Development Center at
theUniversityofCaliforniaatBerkeley
confirmed the need for infrastructure
andproposedalistofindicatorsofthe
engagedcampus,includinginstitutional
structure,administrativesupport,financial and development support for faculty, and community opportunities and
mechanisms supporting engagement.
Lamb et al. (1998) cited lack of connection to mission as a barrier to the
successfulintegrationofSLintoacollegeofbusiness.Battaglia(1995)found
that the degree of community development was correlated with institutional
mission in a study of 2-year colleges.
MortonandTroppe(1996)summarized
survey results of SL implementations
that indicated that campuses achieved
the most success when SL was con-
TABLE2.PublicationsonService-Learning(SL)Applicationsin
BusinessCoreAreas
Authors
Year
Organization
Comment
Downloaded by [Universitas Maritim Raja Ali Haji] at 23:01 11 January 2016
Accounting
Gujarathi&
McQuade
2002
BentleyCollege
UsesoptionalSLassignmentinanintermediate
accountingcourse.
McPhail
2005
Universityof
Glasgow
Usesavisittounemploymentandcommunitycenterstodemonstrateaccountingprobonoservicesan
introductiontotheprofessionseminar.
Rose,Rose,&
Norman
2005
LincolnUniversity,
SouthernIllinois
University,Virginia
Commonwealth
University
Reportsresultofexperimentingraduateaccounting
informationsystemscourse
usingSLastheindependent
variable.
Strupeck&Whitton
2004
IndianaUniversity
Northwest,Purdue
UniversityNorth
Central
ReviewsuseofVolunteer
IncomeTaxAssistance
programforbothfor-credit
electivecourseandnoncredit
volunteeropportunity.
Tschopp
2004
DamienCollege
Non-course-basedrequirementtodesignabusiness
planforcommunityproject
usingAICPAcorecompetenciesforaframework.
Dahlquist
1998
St.Mary’sUniversity
gruent with a broadly understood and
acceptedmissionandwasarticulatedin
thelanguageofthecampus.
Several researchers have demonstrated that faculty are reluctant to
participate in SL. SL courses typically
take more time to manage than do traditional courses. Morton and Troppe
(1996)foundthatfacultyviewedcourse
developmentgrantsandreleasetimeas
the most important means for motivating faculty to undertake SL. Berman
(1999), Bergkamp (1996), and Euster
and Weinbach (1994) also emphasized
theimportanceoffacultyrewardinsuccessful implementation of SL partnerships. Kolenko, Porter, Wheatley, and
Colby (1996) advocated the use of SL
inteachingbusinessethicsandprovided
an analysis of curriculum and faculty
issues relating to maximization of success. Although some of those issues
maystillinfluencefacultyparticipation,
the continued growth of SL and the
absence of more current publications
regarding faculty issues could indicate
decreased importance of the issue as
facultyexploretheabilityofSLtohelp
themaccomplishcourseobjectives.
Finance
IllustratesuseofaSLprojectinfinancecourse.
InformationSystems
Lazar&Lidtke
2002
TowsonUniversity
DescribesseveralSLapplicationsininformationsystemscurriculum.
Preiser-Huey&
Navarette
2006
CaliforniaState
Polytechnic
University
Usesacase-studySLapplicationinaWeb-basedsystemsdevelopmentcourse.
Management
Angelidis,Tomic,
&Ibrahim
2004
St.John’s
University,Augusta
StateUniversity
Providescomprehensivestrategicanalysisofcommunity
businessororganizationina
strategicmanagementcourse.
Crowe
2003
St.LouisUniversity
Develops,throughempirical
research,anassessmentprotocolforSLinmanagement
education.
Kenworthy-U’Ren
2005
BentleyCollege
Providesdiscussionby
expertsoncrossdisciplinary
issueswithSLandtheir
impactonmanagement
education.
Madsen&Turnbull
2006
UtahValleyState
College
MeasureseffectofSLproject
onstudentlearningincompensationandbenefitscourse.
(tablecontinues)
ResearchonSLinBusiness
TheliteratureonSLreflectsitsinterdisciplinary nature and is a relatively
recentintegrationintobusinessresearch.
Some disciplines have little or no published research relative to SL in their
field. If faculty are not reading general
business journals, then it is highly likely that they know nothing about applications of SL in business. I compiled
researches cited in this review from a
searchforwords“business”and“service
learning”inProquest—anonlinesearch
engine. I also conducted a review of
onlineresourcesavailablefromCampus
Compact, the Corporation for National
andCommunityService,andtheNational Service Learning Clearinghouse. I
scanned the bibliographies of relevant
research articles on business and SL. I
readthearticlesintheirentiretytoobtain
detailedinformationonSLimplementation.Itisimportanttonotethatthereis
a large body of research related to attitudes, behavior, and learning that is not
business specific, and I do not address
thoseissuesinthisarticle.
September/October2007
21
TABLE2.(Continued)
Author
Year
Organization
Comment
Salimbeneetal.
2005
BentleyCollege
Summarizesexperiencein
integratingSLandreports
ontheapplicationofmanagementconceptstosocial
problems.
Weber&Sleeper
2003
St.CloudState
University
DescribesSLapproachesin
organizationalbehaviorand
legalenvironmentcourses.
SLApplicationsinBusinessCoreAreas
Downloaded by [Universitas Maritim Raja Ali Haji] at 23:01 11 January 2016
Marketing
Easterling&
Rudell
1997
BentleyCollege,
IonaCollege
DescribesSLintegration
possibilitiesinmarketing,
includinglearningoutcomes.
Hagenbuch
2006
MessiahCollege
DescribesaSLsalesprojectinanonprofitorganizationandthepositivebenefitsforbothstudentsand
theorganization.
Klink&Athaide
2004
SellingerSchoolof
Businessand
Management,
LoyolaCollege
ProvidesanSLimplementationforaprinciplesofmarketingcoursewithassessmentoutcomes.
Petkus
2000
BoiseStateUniversity
ProvidesexamplesofSL
applicationstoseveralmarketingcourses.Emphasizes
importanceofmarketingto
nonprofits.
In this article, I group and summarize SL business research into one of
fourgroups:(a)conceptualandgeneral
businessSL,(b)SLapplicationsinbusinesscorecourses,(c)SLapplicationsin
graduate business courses, and (d) SL
applications in courses related to businessprograms.
Tables1–4followadiscussionofthe
articlesineachgroup.Iconcludewitha
visionforSLinbusiness.
ConceptualandGeneralBusiness
Research
Theoretical or conceptual research on
businessethicspublishedinbusinessjournalsappearedearliest(seeTable1).Zlotkowski(1996)advocatedtheuseofSLto
broadenstudentperspectiveswhiledemonstratingcourseconceptsandproviding
alinktotheexternalenvironment.Rama,
Ravenscroft, Wolcott, and Zlotkowski
(2000) provided a summary of research
onacademicandpersonalstudentSLoutcomes that was drawn primarily from
22
JournalofEducationforBusiness
ThoseexamplesofSLimplementations
aregreatstartingpointsforlearningfrom
the experts. Conceptual SL researchers
in business addressed the same issues
found in SL in general, emphasizing
theopportunityto(a)putbusinessskills
into practice, (b) strengthen ties with
the community, and (c) capitalize on
experientialeducation.Inthediscussion
that follows, I address SL applications
inbusinesscoreareas.
research from outside of business disciplines but provided valuable information
on the effect of SL on student academic
andpersonaloutcomes.Otherresearchers
emphasized the problem-solving nature
of SL projects (Godfrey, Illes, & Berry,
2005)andadvocatedtheuseofuniversitycommunityprojects(Papamarcos,2005).
I have included research articles
whose authors provided descriptions
of SL integration at their universities.
Business educators at Montana State
University integrate SL in the business curriculum throughout all 4 years
(Lamb et al., 1998). Bentley College
hasacomparativelylonghistoryofSL,
and Salimbene, Buono, LaFrage, and
Nurick (2005) have provided an excellent description of Bentley College’s
AllianceforEthicsandSocialResponsibility and SL integration throughout
the campus. Bentley College (2006)
now offers a service-learning certificate,whichincludesanSLnotationon
student diplomas attesting to student
leadershipandcommunityengagement.
Educatorsachievecurriculumintegration such as that found at Bentley College and the Montana State University
after many years of investment. Most
integrationsstartwithanSLapplication
in a specific course. The majority of
researchersdescribehowSLgivesthem
anopportunitytoapplycourseconcepts
and provide community service. In the
presentdiscussion,Ifocusonwhatareas
in the business core areas are reporting SL implementations and how SL
is implemented. Accounting, finance,
management, marketing, and information systems report SL applications. I
revieweachoftheseareasseparately.
Aquickscanofthepublicationyears
inaccountingindicatesarelativelyrecent
integration into accounting curriculum
(see Table 2). In addition, the majority of the SL implementations are not
coursebased.Usinganoptionalassignment(Gujarathi&McQuade,2002),visitinganunemploymentcenter(McPhail,
2005), providingVolunteer Income Tax
Assistance for elective credit (Strupeck
&Whitton,2004),anddesigningabusiness plan as part of a non-course-based
requirement (Tschopp, 2004) are not
related to classic accounting learning
objectives. Those experiences instead
provide excellent opportunities to
involvestudentsinextracurricularactivities of value to the accounting profession. Rose, Rose, and Norman (2005)
reportedanimprovementintheachievementoflearningobjectivesfromtheuse
of an SL experience in an accounting
information-systems course. The richness and complexity introduced by a
liveclientinanaccountinginformation-
systems course vividly demonstrates
a major learning objective of systems
development. The accounting examples
Downloaded by [Universitas Maritim Raja Ali Haji] at 23:01 11 January 2016
TABLE3.PublicationsonService-Learning(SL)Applicationsin
GraduateBusinessCourses
Author
Year
Organization
Bies
1996
Georgetown
University
DescribesgraduateSLprojectthatfocusedonsocial
realityofpowerlessness.
Brown
2000
Universityof
Washington
MBAstudentslearnproject
managementskillswhile
managingdevelopment
projectsforlow-income
seniors.
Collins
1996
Universityof
Wisconsin–Madison
DescribesMBAteam
projectsinbusinessand
societyethicsclassaimedat
improvinglivingconditions
inlow-incomecommunities.
Friedman
1996
WhartonSchool,
Universityof
Pennsylvania
Describesgraduateteam
projectsincludingcommunityserviceinaleadership
course
Graham
1996
LoyolaUniversity
Chicago
Describesstrategic-managementcapstonecoursein
whichstudentspreparea
businessplantoaddressa
communityneed.
Mercer
1996
Universityof
Michigan
Describes2-dayactionlearningmodelapplied
duringorientationinwhich
studentsworkedoncommunityprojects.
Wittmer
2004
Universityof
Denver
CoreMBAcourseknownas
ValuesinActionconnects
SLtoethics,law,andpublicpolicy.Assessmentalso
included.
may indicate that faculty feel less free
to experiment with alternative learning
strategieswhencoursecontentisclosely
tied to a national exam. Alternatively,
the majority of students in an accountingclassmaynothavegainedsufficient
technicalskillstobeusefulinalivesettingandmayactuallycreateliabilityfor
the institution or require an inordinate
amountoftrainingbythecompany.
FinanceisconspicuousforacomparativelackofSLimplementationsand,like
accounting, may represent the depth of
knowledge required for a student to be
usefulasaprofessional.Achievementof
finance-course learning objectives may
notbewellservedbySLexperience.
Information-systems SL applications
are also relatively recent and derive
the same benefits as do the accounting
information systems explained earlier.
Comment
Theresearchersincludedsystemsanalysis,designandimplementationprojects
(Lazar&Lidtke,2002)andWebdesign
(Preiser-Huey & Navarette, 2006). In
thelattertwoSLapplications,SLhada
positiveanddirecteffectontheachievementofamajorlearningobjective.
Management also has a variety of
recentSLapplications.Experientiallearning appears to support achievement of
managementlearningobjectives.Angelidis,Tomic,andIbrahim(2004)reported
ontheuseofSLtoprovideexperiencein
preparingastrategicanalysisforacommunitybusinessororganization.Madsen
and Turnbull (2006) illustrated an SL
applicationinacompensationandbenefitscourse.Otherapplications,including
application of management concepts to
socialproblems(Salimbeneetal.,2005)
and SL approaches used in organiza-
tionalbehavior(Weber&Sleeper,2003)
are good examples and perhaps more
appropriateforstudentstakingintroductory courses in their major. Use of SL
toprovideastrategicanalysiswouldbe
appropriate for a capstone experience,
requiringavarietyofskillslearnedover
theyearsincollege.
Last,reportedmarketingimplementationsappeartobenefitfromtheexperientialaspectofSL.In1997,Easterling
and Rudell provided several possible
opportunities for integration of SL in
marketing courses. Klink and Athaide
(2004) provided an SL application in
an introductory marketing course on
developing a marketing plan for nonprofit organizations. Several of those
researchers emphasized the importance
ofmarketingtononprofitorganizations
and how this skill is frequently underrepresentedinemployeesofnonprofits.
Overall,theresultsofpublishedstudiesindicatethatSLapplicationsimprove
theachievementoflearningobjectivesin
information systems, management, and
marketing.SLinthesesettingsmaybetteraddressanimportantcoursegoalnot
easilycoveredintheclassroom.TheSL
applications in accounting were related
to peripheral skills and were not directly tied to core coursework in accounting. I identified only one application in
finance.Atthislevel,interpersonalskills
are more highly ranked in information
systems, management, and marketing
thaninfinanceandaccounting.
SLApplicationsinGraduateBusiness
Courses
Several SL applications appeared in
1996, including (a) Master of Business
Administration (MBA) team projects to
improve the living conditions in lowincomecommunities(Collins,1996),(b)
communityserviceasleadership(Friedman,1996),(c)astrategicmanagement
capstone course that addresses a communityneed(Graham,1996),and(d)an
action-oriented learning model (Mercer,
1996). In another research application,
Brown (2000) discussed project management for low-income seniors. Last,
Wittmer(2004)discussedonemorecore
MBAcourseinwhichthereisa“Values
inAction”SLcomponent.
On the basis of this list, I conclude
thatSLapplicationsgotofftoastrong
September/October2007
23
Downloaded by [Universitas Maritim Raja Ali Haji] at 23:01 11 January 2016
TABLE4.PublicationsonService-Learning(SL)Applicationsin
Business-RelatedCourses
Authors
Year
Organization
Comment
Dallimore&
Souza
2002
Northeastern
University,
HumboldtState
University
Pedagogicalissuesrelated
touseofSLinbusiness
communicationsclass.
Fielding
2003
PennState
University
Describesassignmentsthat
integratedcross-culturaland
sociallyconsciousissues
intobusinesscommunicationsandadvancedbusiness
writingcourses.
Fleckenstein
1997
CatholicUniversity
ArguesforuseofSLpedagogytoeducatestudentsin
businessethics.
Hogner
1996
FloridaInternational
University
Reportsonbusinessenvironmentprojectfeeding
homelessthathasspread
acrosstheuniversity.
Kenworthy
1996
BentleyCollege
SummarizesSLprojects
involvingover25%of
businessfacultyand3,000
students.
Kohls
1996
GonzagaUniversity
Describestheuseofstudent
reflectioninstudentjournals
inanethicscourse.
Middleton
2005
TexasA&M
University
UsesanSLprojecttodemonstrateleadershipcharacteristics.
Smith
1996
NorthCentral
College
Describesserviceinternshiptodemonstrateethical
values.
Stevens
2001
Universityof
Michigan
DescribesuseofSLas
jointprojectbetween
AmericanandRussian
studentsassistingnonprofit
organizationsinorganizationalcommunications.
Tuckeretal.
1998
OhioUniversity,
Universityof
Baltimore,Colorado
StateUniversity
DescribesuseofcommunitySLincommunications
coursetoimprovestudent
socialskillsandcommunicationsskills.
startinbusinessandtheneithertapered
off or stayed flat. However, my examination of three university Web sites
revealed impressive activity. Stanford
University’s Graduate School of Business includes the Center for Social
Innovation.Theinstructorsatthecenter
engagestudentsandalumniinsocialand
environmentalissues(StanfordUniversityGraduateSchoolofBusiness,2007)
and encompasses thought leadership,
student engagement, and community
24
JournalofEducationforBusiness
engagement in the School of Business.
Harvard Business School offers a fullimmersion program (Harvard Business
SchoolImmersionProgram,2007)that
includesaNewOrleansServiceImmersion that focuses on education, redevelopment, and rebuilding, and gives
students a chance to use management
skills.ThefocusofColoradoStateUniversity’sCollegeofBusinessCenterfor
BusinessEthicsandSocialIssuesison
the application of marketing principles
andtechniquestosocialproblems(ColoradoStateUniversityCollegeofBusiness, 2007). Although publications on
integration of SL are not readily availableinbusinessliterature,theimportant
innovations of some of the universities
thatwerementionedearliermayreflect
a shift in business education and an
integrationofSLintothecurriculumat
aprogramlevel(seeTable3).
SLApplicationsinBusiness-Related
Courses
I found many SL applications in
courses related to business, including
businesscommunications(Dallimore&
Souza, 2002; Fielding, 2003; Stevens,
2001;andTucker,McCarthy,Hoxmeier,
& Lenk, 1998), ethics (Fleckenstein,
1997;Kohls,1996),andotherareas(see
Table 4). Communication is a good fit
for SL projects because of the opportunities it provides students to explore
cross-cultural issues and build social
skills. Ethics is also a good choice for
SL applications because those experiencescanofferstudentsanopportunity
toexerciseethicaljudgment.
VisionofSLintheBusiness
Curriculum
IntegrationofSLinthebusinesscurriculum can help universities and colleges achieve their objectives. SL can
createstrongertiesbetweenschooland
community and provide students with
experientiallearningandanopportunity
to exercise new skills. My examinationofpublishedliteratureonSLindicated that SL is not integrated evenly
throughout the business curriculum.
Somecontentareasappearedtobeable
toaccommodateanSLapplicationwith
greaterfacilitythanotherswere.Therefore, coordination of SL implementationatthecollegelevelmaybethebest
way to derive maximum benefits from
SL experiences. The question is what
learning objectives do faculty and colleges hope to achieve and what is the
bestwaytoachievethem.
Leadersinthisarea(StanfordUniversity’sCenterforSocialInnovation,UniversityofCaliforniaatBerkley’sService
Learning Research and Development
Center, Colorado State University College of Business’s Center for Business
Downloaded by [Universitas Maritim Raja Ali Haji] at 23:01 11 January 2016
Ethics and Social Issues) create entities with broad umbrellas that provide
focusandcoordination,supportingparticipantsandservingasliaisonsbetween
the campus and community. Educators
attheColoradoStateUniversityCollege
of Business’s Center for Business Ethics and Social Issues conduct research,
training,andserviceprojectsthataddress
social issues. This center operates as
more than an umbrella for SL implementation and provides very specific
strategic focus and direction. Many of
the center’s researchers focus on social
marketing to unsell harmful behaviors
(ColoradoStateUniversity,2007).Those
unifyingconceptsserveasaframework,
with the objective of engaging students
andalumniinsocialandenvironmental
issues. The goal is the development of
people who are engaged in their communityandworld.Althoughinteresting
innovations can arise from individual
course SL applications, SL implementations may not be evenly effective or
applicable across business disciplines;
therefore, coordination of SL efforts at
the college level can provide strategic
direction to assist the achievement of
desiredstudentoutcomesandcoordinate
SLexperiencesinthecollege.
SL has increased because it provides
desiredacademicandpersonaloutcomes.
However,researchersandeducatorshave
todeterminewhereSLbestappliesand
how it should be implemented. Additional research to determine the variablescriticalforsuccessfulimplementation and learning objectives best served
by SL experience, and additional study
about the relationship of SL to the collegeasawhole,wouldhelpclarifyand
strengthentheroleofSLinbusiness.
NOTES
Dr.ChristineP.Andrews’researchfocuseson
therelationbetweenbusinessprocessknowledge
andevaluationandaccountingforenvironmental
impacts.
Correspondence concerning this article should
beaddressedtoDr.ChristineP.Andrews,College
ofBusiness,FloridaGulfCoastUniversity,10501
FGCUBlvd.,S.,FortMyers,FL33965.
E-mail:candrews@fgcu.edu
REFERENCES
American Association for Higher Education
(AAHE). (2004). Campus progress: Supporting the scholarship of teaching and learning.
Washington,DC:Stylus.
Angelidis,A.,Tomic,I.,&Ibrahim,N.A.(2004).
Servicelearningprojectsenhancestudentlearninginstrategicmanagementcourses.Reviewof
Business,25(2),32–36.
Battaglia, P. A. (1995). The community service and adult education functions of urban
two-year colleges: Promising programs in
responsetoinnercityproblems.Unpublished
doctoraldissertation,UniversityofWisconsinMadison,WI.
Bentley College. (2006). Service learning certificate. Retrieved on September 17, 2006,
from http://www.bentley.edu/service-learning
/service-learning_certificate.cfm
Bergkamp,V.(1996).Fanningtheembers:Service
learning in Catholic colleges and universities.
Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University
ofSt.Thomas,MN.
Berman,G.L.(1999).Antecedentsandstrategies
for the successful implementation of service
learningprogramsinhighereducation.Unpublisheddoctoraldissertation,UniversityofMassachusetts,Boston.
Bies, R. J. (1996). Down and out in DC: How
GeorgetownMBAstudentslearnaboutleadershipthroughservicetoothers.JournalofBusinessEthics,15,103–110.
Brown,K.A.(2000).Developingprojectmanagementskills:Aservicelearningapproach.ProjectManagementJournal,31(4),53–58.
Campus Compact. (2006). Welcome to the
Campus Compact website. Retrieved on
September 16, 2006, from http://www.compact.org/
Collins, D. (1996). Serving the homeless and
low-income communities through business &
society/businessethicsclassprojects:TheUniversityofWisconsin-MadisonPlan.Journalof
BusinessEthics,15(1),67–85.
Colorado State University College of Business.
(2007). Center for Business Ethics and Social
Issues.RetrievedJanuary10,2007,fromhttp://
www.biz.colostate.edu/SocialIssues/
Crowe,D.C.(2003).Servicelearningassessment
inmanagementeducation:Thedevelopmentof
a protocol. Unpublished doctoral dissertation,
St.LouisUniversity,St.Louis.
Dahlquist,J.R.(1998).Usingservicelearningin
finance—aprojectexample.JournalofFinancialEducation,24,76–80.
Dallimore, E. J. & Souza, T. J. (2002). Consultingcoursedesign:Theoreticalframeworksand
pedagogical strategies. Business CommunicationQuarterly,65,86–114.
Easterling, D., & Rudell, F. (1997). Rationale,
benefits, and methods of service learning in
marketingeducation.JournalofEducationfor
Business,73(1),58–61.
Euster,G.L.,&Weinbach,R.W.(1994).Faculty
rewards for community service activities: An
update.JournalofSocialWorkEducation,30,
317–324.
Fielding, M. (2003). Two assignments that integratedcrossculturalandsocialissues.Business
CommunicationQuarterly,66,107–121.
Fleckenstein,M.(1997).Servicelearninginbusiness ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 16,
137–141.
Friedman,S.D.(1996).Communityinvolvement
projects in Wharton’s MBA curriculum. JournalofBusinessEthics,15,95–101.
Furco, A. J. (2001). Advancing service learning
at research universities. New Directions for
HigherEducation,2001,67–78.
Furco, A. J. (2004, March 28). The educational impacts of service learning: What do we
knowfromtheresearch?Paperpresentedatthe
National Service Learning Conference, Albuquerque,NM.
Godfrey,P.C.(1999).ArejoindertoKenworthyU’Ren enlarging the tent of service learning.
JournalofManagementInquiry,8,388–390.
Godfrey,P.C.,Illes,L.M.,&Berry,G.R.(2005).
Creatingbreadthinbusinesseducationthrough
service learning. Academy of Management
LearningandEducation,4,309–323.
Graham, J. (1996). Business plan proposals for
inner-city neighborhoods:A strategic management assignment for MBA students at Loyola
UniversityChicago.JournalofBusinessEthics,
15,87–94.
Gujarathi,M.R.,&McQuade,R.J.(2002).Servicelearninginbusinessschools:Acasestudy
in an intermediate accounting course. Journal
ofEducationforBusiness,77,144–150.
Hagenbuch,D.J.(2006).Servicelearninginputs
and outcomes in a personal selling course.
JournalofMarketingEducation,28(1),26–34.
Harvard Business School Immersion Program.
(2007). Harvard Business School offers new
“immersion” programs.RetrievedJanuary10,
2007, from http://www.hbs.edu/news/121906_
immersion.html
Hogner,R.H.(1996).Speakinginpoetry:Communityservice-basedbusinesseducation.JournalofBusinessEthics,15(1),33–43.
Kenworthy,A. L. (1996). Linking business education, campus culture and community: The
Bentley Service Learning Project. Journal of
BusinessEthics,15,121–131.
Kenworthy-U’Ren,A. (2005).Toward a scholarshipofengagement:AdialoguebetweenAndy
VandeVenandEdwardZlotkowski.Academy
of Management Learning and Education, 4,
355–362.
Klink,R.R.,&Athaide,G.A.(2004).Implementingservicelearningintheprinciplesofmarketing course. Journal of Marketing Education,
26,145–153.
Kohls,J.(1996).Studentexperienceswithservice
learninginabusinessethicscourse.Journalof
BusinessEthics,15,45–57.
Kolenko,T.A.,Porter,G.,Wheatley,W.,&Colby,
M.(1996).Acritiqueofservicelearningprojects in management education: Pedagogical
foundations, barriers, and guidelines. Journal
ofBusinessEthics,15,133–142.
Lamb,C.H.,Swinth,R.L.,Vinton,K.L.,&Lee,
J.B.(1998).Integratingservicelearningintoa
business school curriculum. Journal of Management,22,637–655.
Lazar, J., & Lidtke, D. (2002). Service learning
partnerships in the information systems curriculum. In J. Lazar (Ed.), Managing IT community partnerships in the 21st Century (pp.
1–16).Hershey,PA:IdeaGroup.
Lester,S.W.,Tomkovick,C.,Wells,T.,&Flunker,L.(2005).Doesservicelearningaddvalue?
Examining the perspectives of multiple stakeholders. Academy of Management Learning
andEducation,4,278–294.
Madsen,S.R.,&Turnbull,O.(2006).Academic
service learning experiences of compensation
and benefit course students. Journal of ManagementEducation,30,724–742.
McCarthy,A.M.,&Tucker,M.L.(2002).Encouragingcommunityservicethroughservicelearning. Journal of Management Education, 26,
629–648.
McPhail,K.(2005).Careinthecommunity:Professional ethics and the paradox of probono.
AccountingEducation,14,213–227.
Mercer,G.I.(1996).TheglobalcitizenshipMBA
orientationprogram:Actionlearningattheuni-
September/October2007
25
Downloaded by [Universitas Maritim Raja Ali Haji] at 23:01 11 January 2016
versityofMichiganbusinessschool.Journalof
BusinessEthics,15,111–120.
Middleton, K. L. (2005). The service-learning
projectasasupportivecontextforcharismatic
leadership emergence in nascent leaders. The
Academy of Management Learning & Education,4,295–308.
Morton, K., & Troppe, M. (1996). From the
marginstothemainstream:CampusCompact’s
project on integrating service with academic
study.JournalofBusinessEthics,15,21–32.
Papamarcos,S.D.(2002).The“nextwave”inservice learning: Integrative, team-based engagements with structural objectives. Review of
Business,23,31–38.
Papamarcos, S. D. (2005). Giving traction to
management theory: Today’s service learning.
Academy of Management Learning & Education,4,325–335.
Petkus, E. (2000). A Theoretical and Practical
Framework for Service learning in Marketing:
Kolb’sExperientialLearningCycle.Journalo
ISSN: 0883-2323 (Print) 1940-3356 (Online) Journal homepage: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/vjeb20
Service Learning: Applications and Research in
Business
Christine P. Andrews
To cite this article: Christine P. Andrews (2007) Service Learning: Applications and Research in
Business, Journal of Education for Business, 83:1, 19-26, DOI: 10.3200/JOEB.83.1.19-26
To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.3200/JOEB.83.1.19-26
Published online: 07 Aug 2010.
Submit your article to this journal
Article views: 116
View related articles
Citing articles: 19 View citing articles
Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at
http://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=vjeb20
Download by: [Universitas Maritim Raja Ali Haji]
Date: 11 January 2016, At: 23:01
Downloaded by [Universitas Maritim Raja Ali Haji] at 23:01 11 January 2016
ServiceLearning:Applicationsand
ResearchinBusiness
CHRISTINEP.ANDREWS
FLORIDAGULFCOASTUNIVERSITY
FORTMYERS,FLORIDA
ABSTRACT.Researchershavedescribed
servicelearningasanidealwaytointegrate
experientialeducationintocoursework
whilemeetingcommunityneedsandimbuingstudentswithcivicresponsibility.They
haveadvocatedservicelearninginbusiness
asamethodtoimplementcourseconcepts
andincreasestudentunderstandingofthe
externalenvironment.Inthisarticle,the
authorbrieflysummarizesinstitutionaland
programcharacteristicsthatareassociated
withsuccessfulservice-learningprograms.
Shereviewsresearchpublicationsrelated
toservice-learningimplementationsin
business.Theauthorfoundthatthefields
ofinformationsystems,management,and
marketinghavemoreservice-learning
applicationstiedtocourse-earningobjectivesthanhavethefieldsofaccountingand
finance.Further,shesuggeststhatservice
learningmayfitbestinbusinesscourses
whereskilledinteractionwithusersisakey
learninggoal.
Keywords:businesseducation,management,servicelearning
Copyright©2007HeldrefPublications
R
esearchers endorse integration of
servicelearning(SL)intohigher
education as a way to improve the relevance of education and address community needs (Zlotkowski, 1996). SL
is increasingly applied in business disciplines. However, assimilating structural changes in the curriculum is not
easy, and an examination of related
research reveals institutional and programcharacteristicsthatareassociated
withsuccessfulSLimplementations.In
addition,SLapplicationsarenotfound
evenly across all disciplines in business.Inthisarticle,Ibrieflysummarize
institutional and program characteristics that are associated with successful SL programs and review published
researchrelatedtoSLimplementations
in business, focusing on the discipline,
course,andparticularSLapplication.I
concludewithsuggestionsaboutwhere
SL implementation may fit best in a
businesscurriculum.
SL has a broad basis of support in
the United States. The presidents of
Brown University, Stanford University,
GeorgetownUniversity,andtheEducation Commission of the United States
startedCampusCompactinaneffortto
createserviceopportunitiesforstudents
andaddresstheperceivedmoraldecline
of college students (Morton &Troppe,
1996). Campus Compact and its Project on Integrating Service With Academic Study has grown from an initial
membership of 23 schools in 1985 to
over 1,000 two-year and four-year collegesanduniversitiesatthepresenttime
(CampusCompact,2006).SLeducators
useexperientialeducationthatengages
students in a curriculum connected to
theircommunity.
Combining community service and
academic courses and successfully
accomplishing service goals while
achieving learning outcomes is challenging, particularly in undergraduate
businesscourseswhosecurriculumcontentisfrequentlytechnicalandstandardized.Integrationintobusinesscurricula
isalsochallengingbecauseinstitutions’
achievementofacademicgoalsiscriticaltomaintainingtheirbusinessaccreditation and enabling them to succeed
with the requisite technical skills in
placing students in professional positions.Accomplishmentofservicegoals
can come at the sacrifice of learning
outcomes and vice versa. The authors
ofstudiesreferredtointhisarticlefrequentlyoffercreativestrategiesforintegrating SL into business curricula and
accomplishingcoursegoals.
InstitutionalandProgram
Characteristics
Theoretical research can be related
to institutional characteristics, instructionalmethods,personaldevelopment,or
academic outcomes in SL. Institutional
September/October2007
19
Downloaded by [Universitas Maritim Raja Ali Haji] at 23:01 11 January 2016
TABLE1.PublicationsonConceptualandGeneralBusinessService
Learning(SL)
Authors
Year
Organization
Godfrey,Illes,&
Berry
2005
BrighamYoung
University
IllustrateshowSLbroadens
businesseducation,focusing
onitsholistic,problemsolvingnature.
Godfrey
1999
BrighamYoung
University
Makesanargumentfor
compassionatecitizenry.
Kolenkoetal.
1996
KennesawState
College,Rutgers
University,
UniversityofWest
Florida,Marymount
ManhattanCollege
Analyzescurriculumissues,
barriers,andfacultyissues
relatedtoteachingSL.
Lambetal.
1998
MontanaState
University
DescribesSLintegration
throughout4-yeareducation.
Lesteretal.
2005
Universityof
Wisconsin–Eau
Clair,Simmons
Schoolof
Management
Usesempiricaldatato
evaluateSLforstudents,
recruiters,andcommunity
byusingstructuralequation
modeling.
Papamarcos
2002
St.John’s
University
Advocatestheuseof
team-basedprojectsinSL
forclientorganizations
illustratingkeypeople,project,andprocessissues.
Papamarcos
2005
St.John’s
University
Reexaminesexperiential
learningadvocatinguniversity–communitypartnerships
andstudentleadership.
McCarthy&
Tucker
2002
Universityof
Baltimore,Ohio
University
Usesempiricaldatato
measurethelikelihoodof
involvementincommunity
serviceafterparticipationin
SLinbusinessclasses.
Morton&Troppe
1996
ProvidenceCollege,
CampusCompact
Providence
ProvideshistoryofSLand
discussionofeffectsonstudentvalues.
Ramaetal.
2000
TexasA&M
International
University,IowaState
University,Wolcott
LynchAssociates,
BentleyCollege
Summarizesacademicand
personalstudentSLoutcomesandhowaccounting
researcherscancontribute.
Salimbeneetal.
2005
BentleyCollege
DescribesBentley’sService
LearningCenter,theirAllianceforEthicsandSocial
Responsibility,andSLintegration.
Taylor
2005
Universityof
Missouri
InterviewsexperiencedSL
expertswhohaveinsights
basedonresearchand
experience.
Zlotkowski
1996
BentleyCollege
AdvocatesuseofSLto
broadenstudentperspectives
andincreaseunderstanding
ofexternalenvironment.
20
JournalofEducationforBusiness
Comment
characteristics refer to dimensions of
theinstitutionthatpromoteorinhibitthe
integration of service learning. Instructional methodology refers to characteristics of SL implementation related to
programmatic features that support the
achievementoflearningoutcomes,butI
donotaddressthatissueinthisarticle.
Researchers liken building an
engaged campus to a maturation process (AmericanAssociation for Higher
Education[AAHE],2004)thatinvolves
not only developing a shared language
and shared learning but also building
infrastructure, expanding collaboration, instituting policies, and assessing effects. Implementation of SL into
universities broadly takes one of three
forms including (a) implementation
by course section, (b) creation of an
officeofSL,or(c)formationofanSL
consortium (Strand, Marullo, Cutforth,
Stoecker,&Donohue,2003).
Lamb, Swinth, Vinton, and Lee
(1998) attributed much of the resistance to the successful integration of
SLtotheabsenceofinfrastructurefor
sustainingserviceefforts.Theypointed out that the operational aspects
of SL, including identifying and nurturing agency connections, assisting
faculty with designing activities, and
assisting students, require infrastructure and financial commitment from
theinstitution.
In a presentation to the National
Service Learning Conference, Andrew
Furco(2004)fromtheServiceLearning
Research and Development Center at
theUniversityofCaliforniaatBerkeley
confirmed the need for infrastructure
andproposedalistofindicatorsofthe
engagedcampus,includinginstitutional
structure,administrativesupport,financial and development support for faculty, and community opportunities and
mechanisms supporting engagement.
Lamb et al. (1998) cited lack of connection to mission as a barrier to the
successfulintegrationofSLintoacollegeofbusiness.Battaglia(1995)found
that the degree of community development was correlated with institutional
mission in a study of 2-year colleges.
MortonandTroppe(1996)summarized
survey results of SL implementations
that indicated that campuses achieved
the most success when SL was con-
TABLE2.PublicationsonService-Learning(SL)Applicationsin
BusinessCoreAreas
Authors
Year
Organization
Comment
Downloaded by [Universitas Maritim Raja Ali Haji] at 23:01 11 January 2016
Accounting
Gujarathi&
McQuade
2002
BentleyCollege
UsesoptionalSLassignmentinanintermediate
accountingcourse.
McPhail
2005
Universityof
Glasgow
Usesavisittounemploymentandcommunitycenterstodemonstrateaccountingprobonoservicesan
introductiontotheprofessionseminar.
Rose,Rose,&
Norman
2005
LincolnUniversity,
SouthernIllinois
University,Virginia
Commonwealth
University
Reportsresultofexperimentingraduateaccounting
informationsystemscourse
usingSLastheindependent
variable.
Strupeck&Whitton
2004
IndianaUniversity
Northwest,Purdue
UniversityNorth
Central
ReviewsuseofVolunteer
IncomeTaxAssistance
programforbothfor-credit
electivecourseandnoncredit
volunteeropportunity.
Tschopp
2004
DamienCollege
Non-course-basedrequirementtodesignabusiness
planforcommunityproject
usingAICPAcorecompetenciesforaframework.
Dahlquist
1998
St.Mary’sUniversity
gruent with a broadly understood and
acceptedmissionandwasarticulatedin
thelanguageofthecampus.
Several researchers have demonstrated that faculty are reluctant to
participate in SL. SL courses typically
take more time to manage than do traditional courses. Morton and Troppe
(1996)foundthatfacultyviewedcourse
developmentgrantsandreleasetimeas
the most important means for motivating faculty to undertake SL. Berman
(1999), Bergkamp (1996), and Euster
and Weinbach (1994) also emphasized
theimportanceoffacultyrewardinsuccessful implementation of SL partnerships. Kolenko, Porter, Wheatley, and
Colby (1996) advocated the use of SL
inteachingbusinessethicsandprovided
an analysis of curriculum and faculty
issues relating to maximization of success. Although some of those issues
maystillinfluencefacultyparticipation,
the continued growth of SL and the
absence of more current publications
regarding faculty issues could indicate
decreased importance of the issue as
facultyexploretheabilityofSLtohelp
themaccomplishcourseobjectives.
Finance
IllustratesuseofaSLprojectinfinancecourse.
InformationSystems
Lazar&Lidtke
2002
TowsonUniversity
DescribesseveralSLapplicationsininformationsystemscurriculum.
Preiser-Huey&
Navarette
2006
CaliforniaState
Polytechnic
University
Usesacase-studySLapplicationinaWeb-basedsystemsdevelopmentcourse.
Management
Angelidis,Tomic,
&Ibrahim
2004
St.John’s
University,Augusta
StateUniversity
Providescomprehensivestrategicanalysisofcommunity
businessororganizationina
strategicmanagementcourse.
Crowe
2003
St.LouisUniversity
Develops,throughempirical
research,anassessmentprotocolforSLinmanagement
education.
Kenworthy-U’Ren
2005
BentleyCollege
Providesdiscussionby
expertsoncrossdisciplinary
issueswithSLandtheir
impactonmanagement
education.
Madsen&Turnbull
2006
UtahValleyState
College
MeasureseffectofSLproject
onstudentlearningincompensationandbenefitscourse.
(tablecontinues)
ResearchonSLinBusiness
TheliteratureonSLreflectsitsinterdisciplinary nature and is a relatively
recentintegrationintobusinessresearch.
Some disciplines have little or no published research relative to SL in their
field. If faculty are not reading general
business journals, then it is highly likely that they know nothing about applications of SL in business. I compiled
researches cited in this review from a
searchforwords“business”and“service
learning”inProquest—anonlinesearch
engine. I also conducted a review of
onlineresourcesavailablefromCampus
Compact, the Corporation for National
andCommunityService,andtheNational Service Learning Clearinghouse. I
scanned the bibliographies of relevant
research articles on business and SL. I
readthearticlesintheirentiretytoobtain
detailedinformationonSLimplementation.Itisimportanttonotethatthereis
a large body of research related to attitudes, behavior, and learning that is not
business specific, and I do not address
thoseissuesinthisarticle.
September/October2007
21
TABLE2.(Continued)
Author
Year
Organization
Comment
Salimbeneetal.
2005
BentleyCollege
Summarizesexperiencein
integratingSLandreports
ontheapplicationofmanagementconceptstosocial
problems.
Weber&Sleeper
2003
St.CloudState
University
DescribesSLapproachesin
organizationalbehaviorand
legalenvironmentcourses.
SLApplicationsinBusinessCoreAreas
Downloaded by [Universitas Maritim Raja Ali Haji] at 23:01 11 January 2016
Marketing
Easterling&
Rudell
1997
BentleyCollege,
IonaCollege
DescribesSLintegration
possibilitiesinmarketing,
includinglearningoutcomes.
Hagenbuch
2006
MessiahCollege
DescribesaSLsalesprojectinanonprofitorganizationandthepositivebenefitsforbothstudentsand
theorganization.
Klink&Athaide
2004
SellingerSchoolof
Businessand
Management,
LoyolaCollege
ProvidesanSLimplementationforaprinciplesofmarketingcoursewithassessmentoutcomes.
Petkus
2000
BoiseStateUniversity
ProvidesexamplesofSL
applicationstoseveralmarketingcourses.Emphasizes
importanceofmarketingto
nonprofits.
In this article, I group and summarize SL business research into one of
fourgroups:(a)conceptualandgeneral
businessSL,(b)SLapplicationsinbusinesscorecourses,(c)SLapplicationsin
graduate business courses, and (d) SL
applications in courses related to businessprograms.
Tables1–4followadiscussionofthe
articlesineachgroup.Iconcludewitha
visionforSLinbusiness.
ConceptualandGeneralBusiness
Research
Theoretical or conceptual research on
businessethicspublishedinbusinessjournalsappearedearliest(seeTable1).Zlotkowski(1996)advocatedtheuseofSLto
broadenstudentperspectiveswhiledemonstratingcourseconceptsandproviding
alinktotheexternalenvironment.Rama,
Ravenscroft, Wolcott, and Zlotkowski
(2000) provided a summary of research
onacademicandpersonalstudentSLoutcomes that was drawn primarily from
22
JournalofEducationforBusiness
ThoseexamplesofSLimplementations
aregreatstartingpointsforlearningfrom
the experts. Conceptual SL researchers
in business addressed the same issues
found in SL in general, emphasizing
theopportunityto(a)putbusinessskills
into practice, (b) strengthen ties with
the community, and (c) capitalize on
experientialeducation.Inthediscussion
that follows, I address SL applications
inbusinesscoreareas.
research from outside of business disciplines but provided valuable information
on the effect of SL on student academic
andpersonaloutcomes.Otherresearchers
emphasized the problem-solving nature
of SL projects (Godfrey, Illes, & Berry,
2005)andadvocatedtheuseofuniversitycommunityprojects(Papamarcos,2005).
I have included research articles
whose authors provided descriptions
of SL integration at their universities.
Business educators at Montana State
University integrate SL in the business curriculum throughout all 4 years
(Lamb et al., 1998). Bentley College
hasacomparativelylonghistoryofSL,
and Salimbene, Buono, LaFrage, and
Nurick (2005) have provided an excellent description of Bentley College’s
AllianceforEthicsandSocialResponsibility and SL integration throughout
the campus. Bentley College (2006)
now offers a service-learning certificate,whichincludesanSLnotationon
student diplomas attesting to student
leadershipandcommunityengagement.
Educatorsachievecurriculumintegration such as that found at Bentley College and the Montana State University
after many years of investment. Most
integrationsstartwithanSLapplication
in a specific course. The majority of
researchersdescribehowSLgivesthem
anopportunitytoapplycourseconcepts
and provide community service. In the
presentdiscussion,Ifocusonwhatareas
in the business core areas are reporting SL implementations and how SL
is implemented. Accounting, finance,
management, marketing, and information systems report SL applications. I
revieweachoftheseareasseparately.
Aquickscanofthepublicationyears
inaccountingindicatesarelativelyrecent
integration into accounting curriculum
(see Table 2). In addition, the majority of the SL implementations are not
coursebased.Usinganoptionalassignment(Gujarathi&McQuade,2002),visitinganunemploymentcenter(McPhail,
2005), providingVolunteer Income Tax
Assistance for elective credit (Strupeck
&Whitton,2004),anddesigningabusiness plan as part of a non-course-based
requirement (Tschopp, 2004) are not
related to classic accounting learning
objectives. Those experiences instead
provide excellent opportunities to
involvestudentsinextracurricularactivities of value to the accounting profession. Rose, Rose, and Norman (2005)
reportedanimprovementintheachievementoflearningobjectivesfromtheuse
of an SL experience in an accounting
information-systems course. The richness and complexity introduced by a
liveclientinanaccountinginformation-
systems course vividly demonstrates
a major learning objective of systems
development. The accounting examples
Downloaded by [Universitas Maritim Raja Ali Haji] at 23:01 11 January 2016
TABLE3.PublicationsonService-Learning(SL)Applicationsin
GraduateBusinessCourses
Author
Year
Organization
Bies
1996
Georgetown
University
DescribesgraduateSLprojectthatfocusedonsocial
realityofpowerlessness.
Brown
2000
Universityof
Washington
MBAstudentslearnproject
managementskillswhile
managingdevelopment
projectsforlow-income
seniors.
Collins
1996
Universityof
Wisconsin–Madison
DescribesMBAteam
projectsinbusinessand
societyethicsclassaimedat
improvinglivingconditions
inlow-incomecommunities.
Friedman
1996
WhartonSchool,
Universityof
Pennsylvania
Describesgraduateteam
projectsincludingcommunityserviceinaleadership
course
Graham
1996
LoyolaUniversity
Chicago
Describesstrategic-managementcapstonecoursein
whichstudentspreparea
businessplantoaddressa
communityneed.
Mercer
1996
Universityof
Michigan
Describes2-dayactionlearningmodelapplied
duringorientationinwhich
studentsworkedoncommunityprojects.
Wittmer
2004
Universityof
Denver
CoreMBAcourseknownas
ValuesinActionconnects
SLtoethics,law,andpublicpolicy.Assessmentalso
included.
may indicate that faculty feel less free
to experiment with alternative learning
strategieswhencoursecontentisclosely
tied to a national exam. Alternatively,
the majority of students in an accountingclassmaynothavegainedsufficient
technicalskillstobeusefulinalivesettingandmayactuallycreateliabilityfor
the institution or require an inordinate
amountoftrainingbythecompany.
FinanceisconspicuousforacomparativelackofSLimplementationsand,like
accounting, may represent the depth of
knowledge required for a student to be
usefulasaprofessional.Achievementof
finance-course learning objectives may
notbewellservedbySLexperience.
Information-systems SL applications
are also relatively recent and derive
the same benefits as do the accounting
information systems explained earlier.
Comment
Theresearchersincludedsystemsanalysis,designandimplementationprojects
(Lazar&Lidtke,2002)andWebdesign
(Preiser-Huey & Navarette, 2006). In
thelattertwoSLapplications,SLhada
positiveanddirecteffectontheachievementofamajorlearningobjective.
Management also has a variety of
recentSLapplications.Experientiallearning appears to support achievement of
managementlearningobjectives.Angelidis,Tomic,andIbrahim(2004)reported
ontheuseofSLtoprovideexperiencein
preparingastrategicanalysisforacommunitybusinessororganization.Madsen
and Turnbull (2006) illustrated an SL
applicationinacompensationandbenefitscourse.Otherapplications,including
application of management concepts to
socialproblems(Salimbeneetal.,2005)
and SL approaches used in organiza-
tionalbehavior(Weber&Sleeper,2003)
are good examples and perhaps more
appropriateforstudentstakingintroductory courses in their major. Use of SL
toprovideastrategicanalysiswouldbe
appropriate for a capstone experience,
requiringavarietyofskillslearnedover
theyearsincollege.
Last,reportedmarketingimplementationsappeartobenefitfromtheexperientialaspectofSL.In1997,Easterling
and Rudell provided several possible
opportunities for integration of SL in
marketing courses. Klink and Athaide
(2004) provided an SL application in
an introductory marketing course on
developing a marketing plan for nonprofit organizations. Several of those
researchers emphasized the importance
ofmarketingtononprofitorganizations
and how this skill is frequently underrepresentedinemployeesofnonprofits.
Overall,theresultsofpublishedstudiesindicatethatSLapplicationsimprove
theachievementoflearningobjectivesin
information systems, management, and
marketing.SLinthesesettingsmaybetteraddressanimportantcoursegoalnot
easilycoveredintheclassroom.TheSL
applications in accounting were related
to peripheral skills and were not directly tied to core coursework in accounting. I identified only one application in
finance.Atthislevel,interpersonalskills
are more highly ranked in information
systems, management, and marketing
thaninfinanceandaccounting.
SLApplicationsinGraduateBusiness
Courses
Several SL applications appeared in
1996, including (a) Master of Business
Administration (MBA) team projects to
improve the living conditions in lowincomecommunities(Collins,1996),(b)
communityserviceasleadership(Friedman,1996),(c)astrategicmanagement
capstone course that addresses a communityneed(Graham,1996),and(d)an
action-oriented learning model (Mercer,
1996). In another research application,
Brown (2000) discussed project management for low-income seniors. Last,
Wittmer(2004)discussedonemorecore
MBAcourseinwhichthereisa“Values
inAction”SLcomponent.
On the basis of this list, I conclude
thatSLapplicationsgotofftoastrong
September/October2007
23
Downloaded by [Universitas Maritim Raja Ali Haji] at 23:01 11 January 2016
TABLE4.PublicationsonService-Learning(SL)Applicationsin
Business-RelatedCourses
Authors
Year
Organization
Comment
Dallimore&
Souza
2002
Northeastern
University,
HumboldtState
University
Pedagogicalissuesrelated
touseofSLinbusiness
communicationsclass.
Fielding
2003
PennState
University
Describesassignmentsthat
integratedcross-culturaland
sociallyconsciousissues
intobusinesscommunicationsandadvancedbusiness
writingcourses.
Fleckenstein
1997
CatholicUniversity
ArguesforuseofSLpedagogytoeducatestudentsin
businessethics.
Hogner
1996
FloridaInternational
University
Reportsonbusinessenvironmentprojectfeeding
homelessthathasspread
acrosstheuniversity.
Kenworthy
1996
BentleyCollege
SummarizesSLprojects
involvingover25%of
businessfacultyand3,000
students.
Kohls
1996
GonzagaUniversity
Describestheuseofstudent
reflectioninstudentjournals
inanethicscourse.
Middleton
2005
TexasA&M
University
UsesanSLprojecttodemonstrateleadershipcharacteristics.
Smith
1996
NorthCentral
College
Describesserviceinternshiptodemonstrateethical
values.
Stevens
2001
Universityof
Michigan
DescribesuseofSLas
jointprojectbetween
AmericanandRussian
studentsassistingnonprofit
organizationsinorganizationalcommunications.
Tuckeretal.
1998
OhioUniversity,
Universityof
Baltimore,Colorado
StateUniversity
DescribesuseofcommunitySLincommunications
coursetoimprovestudent
socialskillsandcommunicationsskills.
startinbusinessandtheneithertapered
off or stayed flat. However, my examination of three university Web sites
revealed impressive activity. Stanford
University’s Graduate School of Business includes the Center for Social
Innovation.Theinstructorsatthecenter
engagestudentsandalumniinsocialand
environmentalissues(StanfordUniversityGraduateSchoolofBusiness,2007)
and encompasses thought leadership,
student engagement, and community
24
JournalofEducationforBusiness
engagement in the School of Business.
Harvard Business School offers a fullimmersion program (Harvard Business
SchoolImmersionProgram,2007)that
includesaNewOrleansServiceImmersion that focuses on education, redevelopment, and rebuilding, and gives
students a chance to use management
skills.ThefocusofColoradoStateUniversity’sCollegeofBusinessCenterfor
BusinessEthicsandSocialIssuesison
the application of marketing principles
andtechniquestosocialproblems(ColoradoStateUniversityCollegeofBusiness, 2007). Although publications on
integration of SL are not readily availableinbusinessliterature,theimportant
innovations of some of the universities
thatwerementionedearliermayreflect
a shift in business education and an
integrationofSLintothecurriculumat
aprogramlevel(seeTable3).
SLApplicationsinBusiness-Related
Courses
I found many SL applications in
courses related to business, including
businesscommunications(Dallimore&
Souza, 2002; Fielding, 2003; Stevens,
2001;andTucker,McCarthy,Hoxmeier,
& Lenk, 1998), ethics (Fleckenstein,
1997;Kohls,1996),andotherareas(see
Table 4). Communication is a good fit
for SL projects because of the opportunities it provides students to explore
cross-cultural issues and build social
skills. Ethics is also a good choice for
SL applications because those experiencescanofferstudentsanopportunity
toexerciseethicaljudgment.
VisionofSLintheBusiness
Curriculum
IntegrationofSLinthebusinesscurriculum can help universities and colleges achieve their objectives. SL can
createstrongertiesbetweenschooland
community and provide students with
experientiallearningandanopportunity
to exercise new skills. My examinationofpublishedliteratureonSLindicated that SL is not integrated evenly
throughout the business curriculum.
Somecontentareasappearedtobeable
toaccommodateanSLapplicationwith
greaterfacilitythanotherswere.Therefore, coordination of SL implementationatthecollegelevelmaybethebest
way to derive maximum benefits from
SL experiences. The question is what
learning objectives do faculty and colleges hope to achieve and what is the
bestwaytoachievethem.
Leadersinthisarea(StanfordUniversity’sCenterforSocialInnovation,UniversityofCaliforniaatBerkley’sService
Learning Research and Development
Center, Colorado State University College of Business’s Center for Business
Downloaded by [Universitas Maritim Raja Ali Haji] at 23:01 11 January 2016
Ethics and Social Issues) create entities with broad umbrellas that provide
focusandcoordination,supportingparticipantsandservingasliaisonsbetween
the campus and community. Educators
attheColoradoStateUniversityCollege
of Business’s Center for Business Ethics and Social Issues conduct research,
training,andserviceprojectsthataddress
social issues. This center operates as
more than an umbrella for SL implementation and provides very specific
strategic focus and direction. Many of
the center’s researchers focus on social
marketing to unsell harmful behaviors
(ColoradoStateUniversity,2007).Those
unifyingconceptsserveasaframework,
with the objective of engaging students
andalumniinsocialandenvironmental
issues. The goal is the development of
people who are engaged in their communityandworld.Althoughinteresting
innovations can arise from individual
course SL applications, SL implementations may not be evenly effective or
applicable across business disciplines;
therefore, coordination of SL efforts at
the college level can provide strategic
direction to assist the achievement of
desiredstudentoutcomesandcoordinate
SLexperiencesinthecollege.
SL has increased because it provides
desiredacademicandpersonaloutcomes.
However,researchersandeducatorshave
todeterminewhereSLbestappliesand
how it should be implemented. Additional research to determine the variablescriticalforsuccessfulimplementation and learning objectives best served
by SL experience, and additional study
about the relationship of SL to the collegeasawhole,wouldhelpclarifyand
strengthentheroleofSLinbusiness.
NOTES
Dr.ChristineP.Andrews’researchfocuseson
therelationbetweenbusinessprocessknowledge
andevaluationandaccountingforenvironmental
impacts.
Correspondence concerning this article should
beaddressedtoDr.ChristineP.Andrews,College
ofBusiness,FloridaGulfCoastUniversity,10501
FGCUBlvd.,S.,FortMyers,FL33965.
E-mail:candrews@fgcu.edu
REFERENCES
American Association for Higher Education
(AAHE). (2004). Campus progress: Supporting the scholarship of teaching and learning.
Washington,DC:Stylus.
Angelidis,A.,Tomic,I.,&Ibrahim,N.A.(2004).
Servicelearningprojectsenhancestudentlearninginstrategicmanagementcourses.Reviewof
Business,25(2),32–36.
Battaglia, P. A. (1995). The community service and adult education functions of urban
two-year colleges: Promising programs in
responsetoinnercityproblems.Unpublished
doctoraldissertation,UniversityofWisconsinMadison,WI.
Bentley College. (2006). Service learning certificate. Retrieved on September 17, 2006,
from http://www.bentley.edu/service-learning
/service-learning_certificate.cfm
Bergkamp,V.(1996).Fanningtheembers:Service
learning in Catholic colleges and universities.
Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University
ofSt.Thomas,MN.
Berman,G.L.(1999).Antecedentsandstrategies
for the successful implementation of service
learningprogramsinhighereducation.Unpublisheddoctoraldissertation,UniversityofMassachusetts,Boston.
Bies, R. J. (1996). Down and out in DC: How
GeorgetownMBAstudentslearnaboutleadershipthroughservicetoothers.JournalofBusinessEthics,15,103–110.
Brown,K.A.(2000).Developingprojectmanagementskills:Aservicelearningapproach.ProjectManagementJournal,31(4),53–58.
Campus Compact. (2006). Welcome to the
Campus Compact website. Retrieved on
September 16, 2006, from http://www.compact.org/
Collins, D. (1996). Serving the homeless and
low-income communities through business &
society/businessethicsclassprojects:TheUniversityofWisconsin-MadisonPlan.Journalof
BusinessEthics,15(1),67–85.
Colorado State University College of Business.
(2007). Center for Business Ethics and Social
Issues.RetrievedJanuary10,2007,fromhttp://
www.biz.colostate.edu/SocialIssues/
Crowe,D.C.(2003).Servicelearningassessment
inmanagementeducation:Thedevelopmentof
a protocol. Unpublished doctoral dissertation,
St.LouisUniversity,St.Louis.
Dahlquist,J.R.(1998).Usingservicelearningin
finance—aprojectexample.JournalofFinancialEducation,24,76–80.
Dallimore, E. J. & Souza, T. J. (2002). Consultingcoursedesign:Theoreticalframeworksand
pedagogical strategies. Business CommunicationQuarterly,65,86–114.
Easterling, D., & Rudell, F. (1997). Rationale,
benefits, and methods of service learning in
marketingeducation.JournalofEducationfor
Business,73(1),58–61.
Euster,G.L.,&Weinbach,R.W.(1994).Faculty
rewards for community service activities: An
update.JournalofSocialWorkEducation,30,
317–324.
Fielding, M. (2003). Two assignments that integratedcrossculturalandsocialissues.Business
CommunicationQuarterly,66,107–121.
Fleckenstein,M.(1997).Servicelearninginbusiness ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 16,
137–141.
Friedman,S.D.(1996).Communityinvolvement
projects in Wharton’s MBA curriculum. JournalofBusinessEthics,15,95–101.
Furco, A. J. (2001). Advancing service learning
at research universities. New Directions for
HigherEducation,2001,67–78.
Furco, A. J. (2004, March 28). The educational impacts of service learning: What do we
knowfromtheresearch?Paperpresentedatthe
National Service Learning Conference, Albuquerque,NM.
Godfrey,P.C.(1999).ArejoindertoKenworthyU’Ren enlarging the tent of service learning.
JournalofManagementInquiry,8,388–390.
Godfrey,P.C.,Illes,L.M.,&Berry,G.R.(2005).
Creatingbreadthinbusinesseducationthrough
service learning. Academy of Management
LearningandEducation,4,309–323.
Graham, J. (1996). Business plan proposals for
inner-city neighborhoods:A strategic management assignment for MBA students at Loyola
UniversityChicago.JournalofBusinessEthics,
15,87–94.
Gujarathi,M.R.,&McQuade,R.J.(2002).Servicelearninginbusinessschools:Acasestudy
in an intermediate accounting course. Journal
ofEducationforBusiness,77,144–150.
Hagenbuch,D.J.(2006).Servicelearninginputs
and outcomes in a personal selling course.
JournalofMarketingEducation,28(1),26–34.
Harvard Business School Immersion Program.
(2007). Harvard Business School offers new
“immersion” programs.RetrievedJanuary10,
2007, from http://www.hbs.edu/news/121906_
immersion.html
Hogner,R.H.(1996).Speakinginpoetry:Communityservice-basedbusinesseducation.JournalofBusinessEthics,15(1),33–43.
Kenworthy,A. L. (1996). Linking business education, campus culture and community: The
Bentley Service Learning Project. Journal of
BusinessEthics,15,121–131.
Kenworthy-U’Ren,A. (2005).Toward a scholarshipofengagement:AdialoguebetweenAndy
VandeVenandEdwardZlotkowski.Academy
of Management Learning and Education, 4,
355–362.
Klink,R.R.,&Athaide,G.A.(2004).Implementingservicelearningintheprinciplesofmarketing course. Journal of Marketing Education,
26,145–153.
Kohls,J.(1996).Studentexperienceswithservice
learninginabusinessethicscourse.Journalof
BusinessEthics,15,45–57.
Kolenko,T.A.,Porter,G.,Wheatley,W.,&Colby,
M.(1996).Acritiqueofservicelearningprojects in management education: Pedagogical
foundations, barriers, and guidelines. Journal
ofBusinessEthics,15,133–142.
Lamb,C.H.,Swinth,R.L.,Vinton,K.L.,&Lee,
J.B.(1998).Integratingservicelearningintoa
business school curriculum. Journal of Management,22,637–655.
Lazar, J., & Lidtke, D. (2002). Service learning
partnerships in the information systems curriculum. In J. Lazar (Ed.), Managing IT community partnerships in the 21st Century (pp.
1–16).Hershey,PA:IdeaGroup.
Lester,S.W.,Tomkovick,C.,Wells,T.,&Flunker,L.(2005).Doesservicelearningaddvalue?
Examining the perspectives of multiple stakeholders. Academy of Management Learning
andEducation,4,278–294.
Madsen,S.R.,&Turnbull,O.(2006).Academic
service learning experiences of compensation
and benefit course students. Journal of ManagementEducation,30,724–742.
McCarthy,A.M.,&Tucker,M.L.(2002).Encouragingcommunityservicethroughservicelearning. Journal of Management Education, 26,
629–648.
McPhail,K.(2005).Careinthecommunity:Professional ethics and the paradox of probono.
AccountingEducation,14,213–227.
Mercer,G.I.(1996).TheglobalcitizenshipMBA
orientationprogram:Actionlearningattheuni-
September/October2007
25
Downloaded by [Universitas Maritim Raja Ali Haji] at 23:01 11 January 2016
versityofMichiganbusinessschool.Journalof
BusinessEthics,15,111–120.
Middleton, K. L. (2005). The service-learning
projectasasupportivecontextforcharismatic
leadership emergence in nascent leaders. The
Academy of Management Learning & Education,4,295–308.
Morton, K., & Troppe, M. (1996). From the
marginstothemainstream:CampusCompact’s
project on integrating service with academic
study.JournalofBusinessEthics,15,21–32.
Papamarcos,S.D.(2002).The“nextwave”inservice learning: Integrative, team-based engagements with structural objectives. Review of
Business,23,31–38.
Papamarcos, S. D. (2005). Giving traction to
management theory: Today’s service learning.
Academy of Management Learning & Education,4,325–335.
Petkus, E. (2000). A Theoretical and Practical
Framework for Service learning in Marketing:
Kolb’sExperientialLearningCycle.Journalo