09.40.0038 Christina Rasma Prasanti DAFTAR PUSTAKA

  57    

  DAFTAR PUSTAKA Ahmadi, A. dan Sholeh, M. 2005. Psikologi Perkembangan: Edisi Revisi.

  Jakarta: PT. Rineka Cipta Alwisol. 2004. Psikologi Kepribadian: Edisi Revisi. Malang: UPT Penerbitan Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang

Anna, L.K. 2013. Tambah Sehat Berkat Pelihara Hewan.

http://health.kompas.com/read/2013/04/30/13435924/Tambah.Sehat.B erkat.Pelihara.Hewan. 2 Juli 2013

  Archer, J. 1997. Why Do People Love Their Pets. Journal of Evolution and Human Behavior. Volume 18, Issue 4, pp:237–259

Assad,M. 2010. Hukum Memelihara Anjing Dalam Perspektif Islam.

http://muhammadassad.wordpress.com/2010/04/20/hukum- memelihara-anjing-dalam-perspektif-islam/. 28 Juni 2013

  Atkinson,R.L ,dkk. 2010. Pengantar Psikologi. Jilid Dua. Tangerang : Interaksara Brad, K. 2006. Urban Animal Magazine. New South Wales, Australia. www.urbananimal.net/press Brotowidjoyo, M. 1991. Metodologi Penelitian dan Penulisan Karangan

Ilmiah. Yogyakarta : Liberty

  Cakraningrat, K.P.H. 1994. Kitab Primbon: Betaljemur Adammakna.

  Yogyakarta: CV. Buana Raya. Coren, S. 2010. Personality Differences Between Dog and Cat Owners.

  58     ________. 2012. Your Dog Watches You and Interprets Your Behavior.

http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/canine-corner/201210/your-

dog-watches-you-and-interprets-your-behavior (23 oktober 2012)

  Chandra, B. 1995. Pengantar Statistik Kesehatan. Jakarta: penerbit buku kedokteran EGC Daly, B dan Morton, L. 2006. An Investigation Of Human–Animal Interactions And Empathy As Related To Pet Preference,Ownership,

  Attachment,And Attitudes In Children. Journal Anthrozoos. Vol.19,No.2, p.113-127 Douglas, D. 2005. Benefits To Pets From The Human-Animal Bond : A Study Of Pet Owner Behaviors and Their Relation To Attachment. Wichita State University

  

Egan, V. 2009. The ‘Big Five’: Neuroticism,Extraversion, Openness,

Agreeableness And Conscientiousness as Anorganisational Schemefor Thinking About Aggression And Violence. Dalam Mary McMurran & Richard Howard (Eds) Personality, Personality Disorder And Violence. UK.

  Ensiclopedia Britannica. 2013. http://global.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/453505/pet. 5 Februari 2013

Fazriyati, W. 2013. Kepribadian Di Balik Fantasi Seks.

http://female.kompas.com/read/2013/02/23/11565871/Kepribadian.di.

Balik.Fantasi.Seks. 2 Juli 2013

  Feist, J.dan Feist, G. 2010. Teori Kepribadian. Edisi 7. Jakarta: Salemba Humanika

  59    

  

Friedman, H. dan Schustack, M. 2006. Kepribadian : Teori Klasik dan Riset

Modern: Jilid 2. Alih bahasa: Ikarini, D. F., Hany. M., Prima. P.A.

  Jakarta: Erlangga (Edisi Ketiga)

Gosling, S. Bonnenburg, A.V. 1998. An Integrative Approach to Personality

Research in Anthrozoology: Rating Six Of Pets and Their Owners.

  Journal Anthrozoos. Vol 11, h.148-156

Gosling, S. Kwan,V, John, O. 2003. A Dog’s Got Personality: A Cross-

Species Comparative Approach to Personality Judgments in Dogs and

  Humans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology . Washington:

American Psychological Association. Vol. 85, No. 6, 1161–1169

Gosling, S. Sandy, C. Potter, J. 2010. Personalities of Self-Identified “Dog

People”and “Cat People”. Journal Anthrozoos.Volume 23 hal.213-222.

Hall. C. dan Lindzey. G. 1993. Psikologi Kepribadian 3: Teori-Teori Sifat

dan Behavioristik. Editor : Supratiknya. Jakarta: Kanisius

  Hergovich,dkk. 2011. Exotic Animal Companions And The Personality Of Their Owners. Journal Anthrozoos Vol. 24, h. 317–327 Hurlock, E. 1993. Psikologi Perkembangan. Edisi 5. Jakarta: Erlangga

John, O. dan Srivastava, S. 1999. The big Five Trait Taxonomy: history,

measurement, and theoritical perspective. Handbook of Personality :

Theory and Research. 2nd Edition. New York: The Guilford Press

  

King, L. 2010. Psikologi Umum : Sebuah Pandangan Apresiatif. Jakarta:

Salemba Humanika

Kodiran. 2004. Pewarisan Budaya dan Kepribadian. Jurnal Humaniora.

  Vol.16,h.10-16

  60    

  

McConnell, A. Brown, C. Shoda, T. 2011. Friends With Benefits: On the

Positive Consequences of Pet Ownership. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. American Psychological Association.

  McCrae, R. dan Costa, P. 1995. Domains and Facets: Hierarchical Personality Assessment Using the Revised NEO Personality Inventory. Journal of Personality Assessment. Vol. 64. No.1 ( 21-50)

McGreal, S. 2013. Cat People Are More Distinctive Than Dog People.

http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/unique-everybody- else/201304/cat-people-are-more-distinctive-dog-people. 24 Juni 2013.

  

McConnell, A. Brown, C. Shoda, T. 2011. Friends With Benefits: On the

Positive Consequences of Pet Ownership. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. American Psychological Association.

  McCrae, R. dan Costa, P. 1995. Domains and Facets: Hierarchical Personality Assessment Using the Revised NEO Personality Inventory. Journal of Personality Assessment. Vol. 64. No.1 ( 21-50)

Meirisa, P. 2012. Cara Berpakaian Menceritakan Siapa Anda.

http://female.kompas.com/read/2012/08/28/20020729/Cara.Berpakaia n.Menceritakan.Siapa.Anda. 2 Juli 2013

  

Merrill, S.M. 2012. Individual Differences and Pet Ownership Status:

Distinguishing Among Types Of Pet Owner and Non-Owner. San Jose State University.

Narbuko, C. dan Achmadi, A. 2002. Metodologi Penelitian. Jakarta: Bumi

Aksara

Nasution, E. dan Usman,H. 2006. Proses Penelitian Kuantitatif. Jakarta:

Lembaga Penerbit Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Indonesia

  61    

Pratama, B. 2010. Survey Hewan Peliharaan.

http://id.ipanelonline.com/uploads/static_html/28/self_survey_stat_51

91.html. 11 Desember 2012

  Purnomo, R. 2010. Pengaruh Kepribadian, Self-Efficacy, Dan Locus Of

Control Terhadap Persepsi Kinerja Usaha Skala Kecil Dan Menengah.

  Jurnal Bisnis dan Ekonomi (JBE), Vol. 17, No. 2. Hal. 144 – 160 Robins, D. Sanders, C. Cahill, S. 1991. Pet-Facilitated Interaction in a Public. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography. Volume 20, No.1, pp. 3-25 Setyanti, C.A. 2013. Kepribadian Dilihat Dari Gaya Bercinta Anda.

http://female.kompas.com/read/2013/06/20/15094198/Kepribadian.Dil

ihat.dari.Gaya.Bercinta.Anda. 2 Juli 2013

  ____________. 2012. Tipe Keperibadian Berdasarkan Golongan Darah.

http://female.kompas.com/read/2012/06/08/15077563/Tipe.Keperibadi

an.Berdasarkan.Golongan.Darah. 2 Juli 2013.

  Smolkovic, I. Fajfar, M. Mlinaric, V. 2012. Attachment to Pets and

Interpersonal Relationships. Journal of Europian: Psychology

Students. Vol. 3. pp. 15-23

  Soto, C. dan John, O. 2009. Ten facet scales for the Big Five Inventory:

Convergence with NEO PI-R Facets, Self-Peer Agreement, and

Discriminant Validity. Journal of Research in Personality 43. 84–90 Suryabrata, S. 2003. Psikologi Kepribadian. Jakarta: CV Rajawali.

  Triandis, H. dan Suh, M. 2002. Cultural Influences On Personality. Annual Reviews Psychology vol. 53:133–60

  62    

  Woodward, L. dan Bauer, A. 2007. People and Their Pets: A Relational Perspective on Interpersonal Complementarity and Attachment in Companion Animal Owners. Journal of human-animal studies.

  Society and Animals. Vol: 15,h:169-189.

   Widhiarso, W. 2011. Orientasi Kepatutan Sosial dan Respons Tipuan Pada Alat Ukur dalam Konteks Seleksi Kerja. Jurnal Benefit ; Manajemen dan Bisnis. Vol 15, hal 79-90.

  Widyorini, E. Kristiana. Roswita, Y. 2003. Adaptasi Inventory Kepribadian “NEO-PI-R”.

  Hasil Penelitian. Semarang: Laboratorium Psikodiagnostik Fakultas Psikologi Unika Soegijapranata. (Tidak Diterbitkan)

  

LAMPIRAN: UJI VALIDITAS DAN RELIABILITAS

Neuroticism Scale: ALL VARIABLES Case Processing Summary

  N % Cases Valid 68 100.0

  a

  Excluded 0 0.0 Total 68 100.0 a. Listwise deletion based on all variables in the procedure.

  Reliability Statistics

  Cronbach's Alpha N of Items

  .768 8

  Item-Total Statistics

  Scale Scale Mean if Variance if Corrected Cronbach's

  Item Item Item-Total Alpha if Item Deleted Deleted Correlation Deleted b4

  21.0294 18.895 .267 .775 b14 20.3088 15.560 .569 .724 b19 20.2794 15.100 .684 .700 b29 19.8676 18.326 .286 .775 b39 20.3824 15.911 .700 .703 b9a 21.1912 17.321 .447 .747 b24a 20.7500 19.354 .268 .772 b34a 20.5882 17.141 .537 .732

   

Extraversion

    Scale: ALL VARIABLES Case Processing Summary

  N % Cases Valid 68 100.0

  a

  Excluded 0 0.0 Total 68 100.0 a. Listwise deletion based on all variables in the procedure.

  Reliability Statistics

  Cronbach's Alpha N of Items

  .801 8

  

Item-Total Statistics

  Scale Scale Mean Variance if Corrected Cronbach's if Item Item Item-Total Alpha if Item

  Deleted Deleted Correlation Deleted b1 25.4559 18.282 .613 .765 b11 25.4853 20.134 .372 .797 b16 25.2941 20.509 .379 .796 b26 25.6176 19.016 .498 .781 b36 25.1765 19.043 .652 .766 b6a 25.7206 18.025 .432 .795 b21a 25.7941 16.823 .597 .765 b31a 26.2059 16.226 .631 .758

       

Openness

    Scale: ALL VARIABLES Case Processing Summary

  N % Cases Valid 68 100.0

  a

  Excluded 0 0.0 Total 68 100.0 a. Listwise deletion based on all variables in the procedure.

  Reliability Statistics

  Cronbach's Alpha N of Items

  .796 10

  

Item-Total Statistics

  Scale Scale Mean Variance if Corrected Cronbach's if Item Item Item-Total Alpha if Item

  Deleted Deleted Correlation Deleted b5 33.0147 19.239 .591 .762 b10 32.4853 22.791 .324 .792 b15 32.8529 21.441 .432 .782 b20 32.7059 20.748 .530 .772 b25 33.0147 20.343 .594 .765 b30 32.6029 20.452 .441 .781 b40 33.1765 20.655 .541 .771 b44 33.3235 18.939 .537 .770 b35a 33.7353 21.033 .268 .810 b41a 32.5147 20.134 .529 .770

   

Agreeableness

    Scale: ALL VARIABLES Case Processing Summary

  N % Cases Valid 68 100.0

  a

  Excluded 0 0.0 Total 68 100.0 a. Listwise deletion based on all variables in the procedure.

  Reliability Statistics

  Cronbach's Alpha N of Items

  .510 9

  Item-Total Statistics

  Scale Corrected Cronbach's Scale Mean if Variance if Item-Total Alpha if Item

  Item Deleted Item Deleted Correlation Deleted b7 30.3529 9.844 .091 .522 b17 30.2059 8.912 .229 .479 b22 30.0588 9.429 .365 .455 b32 30.0735 10.308 .061 .522 b42 30.1618 8.914 .368 .440 b2a 30.7794 9.010 .180 .499 b12a 30.3824 8.120 .309 .447 b27a 29.9853 8.851 .270 .465 b37a 30.8235 8.864 .213 .486

   

Conscientiousness

    Scale: ALL VARIABLES Case Processing Summary

  N % Cases Valid 68 100.0

  a

  Excluded 0 0.0 Total 68 100.0 a. Listwise deletion based on all variables in the procedure.

  Reliability Statistics

  Cronbach's Alpha N of Items

  .609 9

  Item-Total Statistics

  Corrected Cronbach's Scale Mean if Scale Variance Item-Total Alpha if Item

  Item Deleted if Item Deleted Correlation Deleted b3 28.0147 11.716 .322 .574 b13 28.1029 12.124 .360 .570 b28 28.1912 10.545 .554 .512 b33 28.2941 13.255 .085 .623 b38 28.1324 11.818 .349 .569 b8a 28.2353 11.824 .132 .640 b18a 28.6176 10.419 .449 .533 b23a 28.7500 11.653 .279 .584 b43a 28.8382 11.988 .215 .602

       

Agreeableness Revisi

    Scale: ALL VARIABLES Case Processing Summary

  N % Cases Valid 68 100.0

  a

  Excluded 0 0.0 Total 68 100.0 a. Listwise deletion based on all variables in the procedure.

  Reliability Statistics

  Cronbach's Alpha N of Items

  .505 5

  Item-Total Statistics

  Scale Corrected Cronbach's Scale Mean if Variance if Item-Total Alpha if Item

  Item Deleted Item Deleted Correlation Deleted b22 15.0588 4.594 .313 .449 b42 15.1618 4.347 .267 .457 b27a 14.9853 4.074 .239 .474 b12a 15.3824 3.434 .307 .433 b37a 15.8235 3.640 .306 .429

       

Conscientiousness Revisi

    Scale: ALL VARIABLES Case Processing Summary

  N % Cases Valid 68 100.0

  a

  Excluded 0 0.0 Total 68 100.0 a. Listwise deletion based on all variables in the procedure.

  Reliability Statistics

  Cronbach's Alpha N of Items

  .686 6

  Item-Total Statistics

  Cronbach's Scale Mean Corrected Item- Alpha if if Item Scale Variance Total Item

  Deleted if Item Deleted Correlation Deleted b3 17.6912 6.963 .385 .656 b13 17.7794 7.309 .442 .643 b28 17.8676 6.266 .568 .593 b38 17.8088 6.873 .472 .630 b18a 18.2941 6.509 .368 .668 b23a 18.4265 6.965 .318 .682

       

LAMPIRAN: HASIL TAMBAHAN Attachment Correlations

  totalvalidNeu totalvalidExtra totalvalidOpen ttlvalidargee2 ttlvalidcons2 ATTCH3 totalvalidNeu Pearson 1 -.126 -.006 -.182 -.043 .031 Correlation

  Sig. (2- .307 .959 .137 .727 .803 tailed) N

  68 68 68 68 68 68 totalvalidExtra Pearson

• .126 1 .433 .164 .120 .328 Correlation Sig. (2- .307 .000 .180 .331 .006 tailed) N 68 68 68 68 68 68 totalvalidOpen Pearson
• .006 .433 1 .124 .188 .219 Correlation Sig. (2- .959 .000 .314 .125 .073 tailed) N 68 68 68 68 68 68 ttlvalidargee2 Pearson
• .182 .164 .124

  1 .347 -.226 Correlation Sig. (2- .137 .180 .314 .004 .064 tailed) N

  68 68 68 68 68 68 ttlvalidcons2 Pearson

• .043 .120 .188 .347

  1 -.114 Correlation Sig. (2- .727 .331 .125 .004 .355 tailed) N

  68 68 68 68 68 68 ATTCH3 Pearson

• .031 .328 .219 -.226 -.114

  1 Correlation Sig. (2- .803 .006 .073 .064 .355 tailed)

  N 68 68 68 68 68 68

• . Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).

       

  LAMPIRAN UJI HIPOTESIS & UJI ASUMSI-UJI HOMOGENITAS Group Statistics Std.

  Std. Error JenisHewan N Mean Deviation Mean validtotal Anjing 31 132.0645 10.58280 1.90073

  Kucing 37 133.9189 11.14395 1.83205 Independent Samples Test

  Levene's Test for Equality of

Variances t-test for Equality of Means

95% Confidence

  Interval of the Difference Sig. (2- Mean Std. Error F Sig. T df tailed) Difference Difference Lower Upper validtotal Equal variances

  .159 .691 -.699 66 .487 -1.85440 2.65216 -7.14960 3.44080 assumed Equal variances not

• .702 64.932 .485 -1.85440 2.63992 -7.12680 3.41799 assumed

                   

  Group Statistics

Std.

  Std. Error JenisHewan N Mean Deviation Mean totalvalidNeu Anjing 31 23.0968 4.25327 .76391

  Kucing 37 23.8108 5.01574 .82458 totalvalidExtra Anjing 31 29.0000 5.05964 .90874

  Kucing 37 29.4595 4.72343 .77653 totalvalidOpen Anjing 31 37.1290 4.66720 .83825

  Kucing 37 36.1622 5.25734 .86430 ttlvalidagree2 Anjing 31 19.0323 2.28741 .41083

  Kucing 37 19.1622 2.45531 .40365 ttlvalidcons2 Anjing 31 20.9355 3.05435 .54858

  Kucing 37 22.1081 2.96070 .48674 Independent Samples Test

  Levene's Test for Equality of Variances t-test for Equality of Means 95% Confidence Interval of the Difference

  Sig. (2- Mean Std. Error F Sig. T df tailed) Difference Difference Lower Upper totalvalidNeu Equal variances .328 .569 -.626 66 .533 -.71404 1.14062 -2.99137 1.56329 assumed Equal variances not -.635 65.986 .527 -.71404 1.12405 -2.95829 1.53022 assumed totalvalidExtra Equal variances .207 .650 -.387 66 .700 -.45946 1.18800 -2.83137 1.91245 assumed Equal variances not -.384 62.179 .702 -.45946 1.19532 -2.84874 1.92982 assumed totalvalidOpen Equal variances assumed .543 .464 .795 66 .430 .96687 1.21688 -1.46270 3.39644 Equal variances not assumed

  .803 65.759 .425 .96687 1.20403 -1.43722 3.37096 ttlvalidagree2 Equal variances .239 .627 -.224 66 .823 -.12990 .57961 -1.28713 1.02732 assumed Equal variances not assumed

• .226 65.225 .822 -.12990 .57595 -1.28008 1.02027