WFS FES: Advertise support for sorting in WFS capabilities
All Fields marked with * are mandatory.
Change Request 210
#:
Assigned OGC 12-034
Document #:
Name: *Stefan Apfel
Organization: *Bentley Systems Inc.
Email: *stefan.apfel@bentley.com
Document
Name/Version:
*OpenGIS Web Feature Service 2.0 Interface Standard (also ISO 19142) / 2.0
OGC Project
Document:
*09-025r1
If this is a revision of a previous submission and you have a Change Request Number, then check here:
Enter the CR number here:
Enter the Revsion Number that you are revising here:
Title:
Source:
*Advertise support for sorting in WFS capabilities
*Bentley Systems Inc.
Work item code:
Category:
* B (Addition of feature)
Reason for *
change:
Some servers don't support sorting but can't tell a client it doesn't.
As most other functionalities are advertised it seem consequential to
me to do so for the sorting support.
Summary of *
change:
I think the filter capabilities sectopn should be enhanced.
1
Consequences if
not approved:
Clauses affected: *
8.3.3
Additional &(0".* +!&*$," &5 0&+*
Documents
affected:
Supporting
Documentation:
Comments:
Status:
Assigned To:
Disposition:
Assigned
WFS/FES SWG
Referred and Posted
2
Change Request 210
#:
Assigned OGC 12-034
Document #:
Name: *Stefan Apfel
Organization: *Bentley Systems Inc.
Email: *stefan.apfel@bentley.com
Document
Name/Version:
*OpenGIS Web Feature Service 2.0 Interface Standard (also ISO 19142) / 2.0
OGC Project
Document:
*09-025r1
If this is a revision of a previous submission and you have a Change Request Number, then check here:
Enter the CR number here:
Enter the Revsion Number that you are revising here:
Title:
Source:
*Advertise support for sorting in WFS capabilities
*Bentley Systems Inc.
Work item code:
Category:
* B (Addition of feature)
Reason for *
change:
Some servers don't support sorting but can't tell a client it doesn't.
As most other functionalities are advertised it seem consequential to
me to do so for the sorting support.
Summary of *
change:
I think the filter capabilities sectopn should be enhanced.
1
Consequences if
not approved:
Clauses affected: *
8.3.3
Additional &(0".* +!&*$," &5 0&+*
Documents
affected:
Supporting
Documentation:
Comments:
Status:
Assigned To:
Disposition:
Assigned
WFS/FES SWG
Referred and Posted
2