Verbal input and interaction in the english reading comprehension class of the fifth semester of the social-science program of SMAK Santo Stanislaus - Widya Mandala Catholic University Surabaya Repository
VERBAL INPUT AND INTERACTION IN THE ENGLISH
RfADING COMPREHENSION CLASS OF THE FIFTH SEMESTER
I
Of THE SOCIAL- SCIENCE PROGRAM OF SMAK SANTO STANISLAUS
A
THESIS
In Partial Fulfilment of the Requirement for
the Sarjana Pendidikan Degree in
English Language Teaching
by
KOPI Kf
CRaltAyu SetlAUfaH
1213085035
UNIVERSITAS KATOLIK WIDYA MANDALA SURABAYA
FAKUL TAS KEGURUAN DAN ILMU PENDIDIKAN
.JURUSAN PENDIDIKAN BAHASA DAN SENI
PROGRAM STUDI PENDIDIKAN BAHASA INGGRIS
DECEMBER, 1989
APPROVAL SHEET
(1)
This i;hesis entitled VERBAL INPUT AND INTERACTION IN THE ENGLISH READING COr·lPBEHENSION CLASS OP THE
FIF'l'H SE!·JESTEH OF
~!.'HE
SOCIAL-·SCIENCE l'RCGltAl'l OF SMAK
SANTO S'l'ANISLAUS
and prepared and subrni tted
by
Rahayu Setim1an
has been approved and accepted as partial fulfilment of
tl1e requirements for the
Sar~n
Pendidikan deEree in
English Lane;uage Teaching by the following advisors.
\
Ii irst Advisor
Second Advisor
APPROVAL SHEET
(2)
This thesis has been ,examined by the Committee
on Oral Examination with a g:t:ade of ::.A:....._ _ _ _ _ _ __
on December 20, 1989.
Drs. Antonius Gurito
\
Chairman
Jap
Hember
Drs.
Dr a.
rv:ember
l'1ember
Approved. by
~
DR. Wuri Soedjatmiko
Head of
the Teacher Trainine
College
the Eng;lish Department
AClOTOVILEDGEl'iENTS
The writer would like to
thanl~
G.od who has
given His blessing to her in accomplishing this thesis.
Her deepest gratitude also goes to:
1. Drs. Stefanus Laga 'rukan, her first thesis
writinB advisor, for his invaluable guidance,
comments, and sugge.stions.
2. Dra. :!:'lorensia Jap, her second advisor, who
has spent her valua·Jle time on encouracing,
advising, and helping the writer ratiently.
3. DR. Vluri Soedjatmiko, the Head of the English
Department, who has given the writer
permission to conduct this study.
4.
~1r.
\·iidaryono, the Headmaster of SfvlAK Santo
Stanislaus, who has allowed the writer to
do her research there.
5. The subjects of this study, the fifth
semester students of the social-science
program of SMAK Santo Stanislaus taking
Reading Comprehension class of the 1989-1990
academic year along with their respective
teacher whose name is kept secret, \-.rho have
made this study possible.
6. Drs. Antonius Gurito, Drs. Agustinus Ngadiman,
and Dra. Agnes Santi \vidiati, serving
together with the writer•s thesis writing
advisors, as the thesis Examination-Committee
chairman and members, who have given her
invaluable suggestions for the improvement
of this thesis.
7. All the librarians of vJidya t·1andala Catholic
University, who have allowed the writer to
borrow books as the references to the
accomplishment of this thesis.
8. Anybody else whose name is not mentioned here
but who has given his/her assistance to the
writer in composing and improving this thesis.
Without their help, this thesis would have never
been accomplished as it should be.
v
Page
APPROVAL SHEET ( 1)
ii
APPROVAL SHEET ( 2)
iii
ACENO\'JLEDGEMENTS
iv
TABLE OF CONTEm.'S
vi
viii
LIS'l' OF TABLES
LIST OF FIGUHES
X
LIS'r OF APFBNDIXES
xi
ABS'l'RACT
CHAPTEH I
xii
INTRODUC'l'ION
1
1.1 Background of the Study
1
1.2 Statement of the Problems
7
1.3 The Objectives of the Study
9
1.4 The Significance of the Study
10
1.5 Scope and Limitations of the
11
Stud;y
1.6 Theoretical Framework
13
1.7 Assumptions
14
1.8 Definition of Key Terms
15
1.9 Orr::;anization :)f the 'l'hesis
18
CHAl'TER II REVIE\·J OJi' RELATED LITEh:A'l'UR:E
Comprehnsibl~
20
Verbal Input
20
2.2 Modified Verbal Interaction
30
2.1
~
2.3 The
System
Se~·nt-Cagory
35
55
CIIAF'l'EH III rmTIIClDOI"OGY
3.1 Design
55
3.2 Population ar:.d Samples
56
3.3 Instruments
59
3.4 Procedures
or
Collecting the Data
3.5 Techniques of the Data Analysis
CHAPTER IV
THE FINDINGS AND THEil{
CHAPTER V
62
INTER'W~AO
O:F 'I'liE FINDINGS
LJ.•
60
l The Findinc;s
69
69
4.2 Interpretaticn of the Findincs
89
CONCLUSION
99
5.1 Summary and Conclusion
99
5.2 Suggestions
102
BIBLIOGRAPHY
108
APPEliDIXES
110
vii
Page
TABLE 3.1
The Talk I'ercentat:;e of Each of the
Seventeen-Categor;r System
TABLE 3.2
The Percentage of Initiate and
Hcspond of the Teacher and the Pupils
TABLE 3.3
64
64-
The Rank Order of the Percentage of
Teacher Talk and Pupil 'l'all( in
English or in Indonesian
TABLE 3.4
65
The Percentage of Each Type of
Elicitation
67
TABLE 3.5
The Percentage of Reply
68
TABLE 3.6
The Percentage of Each Type of
tion
~lodifca
TABLE 4.1
The Talk Percentage of Each
Category
TABLE 4.2
71
The Percentage of Initiate and Respond
of the Teacher and the Pupils
TABLE 4-.3
68
73
The Hank Order of the Percentac;e
of 'l'eacher Tall
RfADING COMPREHENSION CLASS OF THE FIFTH SEMESTER
I
Of THE SOCIAL- SCIENCE PROGRAM OF SMAK SANTO STANISLAUS
A
THESIS
In Partial Fulfilment of the Requirement for
the Sarjana Pendidikan Degree in
English Language Teaching
by
KOPI Kf
CRaltAyu SetlAUfaH
1213085035
UNIVERSITAS KATOLIK WIDYA MANDALA SURABAYA
FAKUL TAS KEGURUAN DAN ILMU PENDIDIKAN
.JURUSAN PENDIDIKAN BAHASA DAN SENI
PROGRAM STUDI PENDIDIKAN BAHASA INGGRIS
DECEMBER, 1989
APPROVAL SHEET
(1)
This i;hesis entitled VERBAL INPUT AND INTERACTION IN THE ENGLISH READING COr·lPBEHENSION CLASS OP THE
FIF'l'H SE!·JESTEH OF
~!.'HE
SOCIAL-·SCIENCE l'RCGltAl'l OF SMAK
SANTO S'l'ANISLAUS
and prepared and subrni tted
by
Rahayu Setim1an
has been approved and accepted as partial fulfilment of
tl1e requirements for the
Sar~n
Pendidikan deEree in
English Lane;uage Teaching by the following advisors.
\
Ii irst Advisor
Second Advisor
APPROVAL SHEET
(2)
This thesis has been ,examined by the Committee
on Oral Examination with a g:t:ade of ::.A:....._ _ _ _ _ _ __
on December 20, 1989.
Drs. Antonius Gurito
\
Chairman
Jap
Hember
Drs.
Dr a.
rv:ember
l'1ember
Approved. by
~
DR. Wuri Soedjatmiko
Head of
the Teacher Trainine
College
the Eng;lish Department
AClOTOVILEDGEl'iENTS
The writer would like to
thanl~
G.od who has
given His blessing to her in accomplishing this thesis.
Her deepest gratitude also goes to:
1. Drs. Stefanus Laga 'rukan, her first thesis
writinB advisor, for his invaluable guidance,
comments, and sugge.stions.
2. Dra. :!:'lorensia Jap, her second advisor, who
has spent her valua·Jle time on encouracing,
advising, and helping the writer ratiently.
3. DR. Vluri Soedjatmiko, the Head of the English
Department, who has given the writer
permission to conduct this study.
4.
~1r.
\·iidaryono, the Headmaster of SfvlAK Santo
Stanislaus, who has allowed the writer to
do her research there.
5. The subjects of this study, the fifth
semester students of the social-science
program of SMAK Santo Stanislaus taking
Reading Comprehension class of the 1989-1990
academic year along with their respective
teacher whose name is kept secret, \-.rho have
made this study possible.
6. Drs. Antonius Gurito, Drs. Agustinus Ngadiman,
and Dra. Agnes Santi \vidiati, serving
together with the writer•s thesis writing
advisors, as the thesis Examination-Committee
chairman and members, who have given her
invaluable suggestions for the improvement
of this thesis.
7. All the librarians of vJidya t·1andala Catholic
University, who have allowed the writer to
borrow books as the references to the
accomplishment of this thesis.
8. Anybody else whose name is not mentioned here
but who has given his/her assistance to the
writer in composing and improving this thesis.
Without their help, this thesis would have never
been accomplished as it should be.
v
Page
APPROVAL SHEET ( 1)
ii
APPROVAL SHEET ( 2)
iii
ACENO\'JLEDGEMENTS
iv
TABLE OF CONTEm.'S
vi
viii
LIS'l' OF TABLES
LIST OF FIGUHES
X
LIS'r OF APFBNDIXES
xi
ABS'l'RACT
CHAPTEH I
xii
INTRODUC'l'ION
1
1.1 Background of the Study
1
1.2 Statement of the Problems
7
1.3 The Objectives of the Study
9
1.4 The Significance of the Study
10
1.5 Scope and Limitations of the
11
Stud;y
1.6 Theoretical Framework
13
1.7 Assumptions
14
1.8 Definition of Key Terms
15
1.9 Orr::;anization :)f the 'l'hesis
18
CHAl'TER II REVIE\·J OJi' RELATED LITEh:A'l'UR:E
Comprehnsibl~
20
Verbal Input
20
2.2 Modified Verbal Interaction
30
2.1
~
2.3 The
System
Se~·nt-Cagory
35
55
CIIAF'l'EH III rmTIIClDOI"OGY
3.1 Design
55
3.2 Population ar:.d Samples
56
3.3 Instruments
59
3.4 Procedures
or
Collecting the Data
3.5 Techniques of the Data Analysis
CHAPTER IV
THE FINDINGS AND THEil{
CHAPTER V
62
INTER'W~AO
O:F 'I'liE FINDINGS
LJ.•
60
l The Findinc;s
69
69
4.2 Interpretaticn of the Findincs
89
CONCLUSION
99
5.1 Summary and Conclusion
99
5.2 Suggestions
102
BIBLIOGRAPHY
108
APPEliDIXES
110
vii
Page
TABLE 3.1
The Talk I'ercentat:;e of Each of the
Seventeen-Categor;r System
TABLE 3.2
The Percentage of Initiate and
Hcspond of the Teacher and the Pupils
TABLE 3.3
64
64-
The Rank Order of the Percentage of
Teacher Talk and Pupil 'l'all( in
English or in Indonesian
TABLE 3.4
65
The Percentage of Each Type of
Elicitation
67
TABLE 3.5
The Percentage of Reply
68
TABLE 3.6
The Percentage of Each Type of
tion
~lodifca
TABLE 4.1
The Talk Percentage of Each
Category
TABLE 4.2
71
The Percentage of Initiate and Respond
of the Teacher and the Pupils
TABLE 4-.3
68
73
The Hank Order of the Percentac;e
of 'l'eacher Tall