journal european economy
,7
g,C*N*WY
Pr':tili*?r**r
*>3;
A1\
*fiarrt*g-tir *;izx*.i"**r*r
:u*{rrt*r*i*e L}*in.**:*itw
/lr'!Dl aEstrYr
oF usA u'{lvERslr}EsAs RErr'E {UE DIVER$FIeRs
ot Rtt{G lHE HilA,rc1al c;rsrs
*-.
"il}i]$ffil*s
co'tPARATTvE ADVAIITAGE At{o corPErrhrcilEss:
r cAs€ sruDy foR IHD,A ril Honrcu.ruR.t.- F*olxrcrst
*rr-r#fffi
$'s,'runoi*t A?lRAcr llo* FoRsGil DnEcr HvEsrcEflT
rn * o.ffffi
FaF ErrpEr{cE rRoil gB/E-opF{G corr{rruEs
* l,snruno$rs Ar{D rAx REVENUE ,O,,L,ZATOI\. tN su&sAHARA AFRtcA
,,,, ,"ffy#ff
TllE PRACnCE OF SALr.E[r_s|t{Ess AclMnES
xr s, v6
nd/'f, r*y,,t&U7n- -' - " ".'-v N LATVIA
xuntu ilt-oAvtw/ftog
,*,rmff.l.fl?g,H'L
,no
nte ecotorps or-ft
W,HEADEY
**L
*rrr&l#-
FOOO CRtsls REALLY A C&Sts?
r.1ffiff^ffiffiffryffi
"-"'
srulrnoils
ffd?mHF*oilEs
,-.-.l,ffiinrd
u-r,*}ffi)f ffi
HATTAGETEiIT ACCOTX
Ph,f,tn xHFlll€ATHAL
or
oEt{srrY; rHE cASE oF A REqorrAL
BA,{x
Aror,E/t
wilnrV,
Ancfi,l
SELF{EpoirrN
\/ERSUS
ffiEffifaffi|PPRoPRATE
Fn,Ee
,,ARC;H,TII,
D/pTALLElr',
- "-#tiH^tffiffcor
ll,er-vss
Excll
RAIE PtoLlcY
'rGE
L,',* Fmrn
iii1fitrliffiipo
X.tdl HtUAtt lt
A HUUP€I{APED RELATKIf,IS}{f,
(xrniltr NofTA, Arryb,ra
HIffiHil.ff'
i'triE
SffiI
FoR nrE
Posr€ocrArlsr EuRopEAir couNrRES:
r*Rqr€i,{ rsocrAt!€ryos(Ar^Lysrsr:
rHEcAsEsruoy
EA
$tFl^noiaAif,,
EraoocEraous cRourm
^'rAI
Fooo Ar{D sEvER^c€ r^ilrF^CruRfrc rlousrR_s
"rHo,oTryEEil
.*"
rEffir.n*Er3s
."*'.
FRor srvss LoucR lEcor{oar/ sorooLs
m1'ffiHXi,.ffi,ffiF**
ro irliiixir-jiidiir
oBa-opED corJrrmr:
tN
**ffi
"*-
e r-ess
nl;#Hlinenlms
iffiilffiv'
*rtffir;#* r"* o#f,^i#fr
*... !ffifi&:
HffiSll$ffi,i[*.
rrx poLrcy HARrcfuqncfi
iio6[In flHfrclL
mo
*
rl*
,,\*.UAUTY Ar^Rsrorr oF
,€]r^vtot'R or n{e
l.rfirpd
S{IEBFO|
cStXC,.il
oF PRoor'filvlrYcHAflGE oF
#iTltsEo{
- run
(Iry, E3rr poarl,
Ssril
.*,ffiffi
*,, *lfiffiIffi"rs
Suloytttot
arDErrcE FoR nao.ilEsn
ttst
R
soc*w -
x^RxEr
Assrsr3xElr
r{EcotrtslRucror{ cofEANtEs
tN
rHArLANo.Ar!AprucAnoil
OUIA|
ffi 'ffiH*tffi
Ssst:3#"ffilliJl*i#Iilnffi tr,!ffi.fftrs,A*Es
Atlo PRoJEcro{'|s oF oEr^ilo FoR
HToHER E[xrcAnot r,. poRruGAL
tr.co*E $lEOlJAUlY, nrE Aito llrtcotE souRcEs
At{ALys€s N crl,t{A
*.uu*ffi!t
SlGtill.l.tn6 tll nrE SIOCX *TRXETS: EVDE
{CE FROI Jt \rEt{?US FC
Vsl.
11
Special issue
2Afi
Angela BESANA
CLUSTER ANALYSIS OII USA UNIVERSITIES
AS REVENUE DIVERSIFIERS DURING
THE FINANCIAL CRISIS
Abstract
For more than ten years, Universities have experienced
an increase in the
complexity of their work and the competitive scenario
that is very crowded, unstable and rather unforeseeable.
on one side, audiences. are multip,re and arways changing in their
esti_
rnates of relationships with universities. On the other
side, uiiversities are al'"'rays looking for diversified revenues, as public
ano private'giant_mat>, The Journal 6r Human Resources
Vol. 32 (3):481-504
13. Halvorsen, R. ParmguisLn (t980) , American Economrc Review Vol.7
2.
-
-
No.3.474475
loslna Purrartutl,
paul illll0r,
Economic Returns to Schooling in
14. Heckman
IuIul
.t
Developed Country:
Evidence for Indonesia
a Less
J, (1979), ,
-
15. Jamison, D. T. J. v. D. Gaag. (1987), , pacific
Economic Review 9(3): 173-189.
18. Miller, P. -charles, M. - Martin, B. (1997), , Economica 64, 131 -54.
19. Mincer, J. (1974), schooling, Earnings and Experience. columbia University
Press: New York
20. okuwa o. B. (20u), aPrivate returns to higher education in Nigeria>, AERC
Research Paper 139. African Economic Researqh consortium, Nairobi.
21. Psacharopoulos, G. (1981),
g,C*N*WY
Pr':tili*?r**r
*>3;
A1\
*fiarrt*g-tir *;izx*.i"**r*r
:u*{rrt*r*i*e L}*in.**:*itw
/lr'!Dl aEstrYr
oF usA u'{lvERslr}EsAs RErr'E {UE DIVER$FIeRs
ot Rtt{G lHE HilA,rc1al c;rsrs
*-.
"il}i]$ffil*s
co'tPARATTvE ADVAIITAGE At{o corPErrhrcilEss:
r cAs€ sruDy foR IHD,A ril Honrcu.ruR.t.- F*olxrcrst
*rr-r#fffi
$'s,'runoi*t A?lRAcr llo* FoRsGil DnEcr HvEsrcEflT
rn * o.ffffi
FaF ErrpEr{cE rRoil gB/E-opF{G corr{rruEs
* l,snruno$rs Ar{D rAx REVENUE ,O,,L,ZATOI\. tN su&sAHARA AFRtcA
,,,, ,"ffy#ff
TllE PRACnCE OF SALr.E[r_s|t{Ess AclMnES
xr s, v6
nd/'f, r*y,,t&U7n- -' - " ".'-v N LATVIA
xuntu ilt-oAvtw/ftog
,*,rmff.l.fl?g,H'L
,no
nte ecotorps or-ft
W,HEADEY
**L
*rrr&l#-
FOOO CRtsls REALLY A C&Sts?
r.1ffiff^ffiffiffryffi
"-"'
srulrnoils
ffd?mHF*oilEs
,-.-.l,ffiinrd
u-r,*}ffi)f ffi
HATTAGETEiIT ACCOTX
Ph,f,tn xHFlll€ATHAL
or
oEt{srrY; rHE cASE oF A REqorrAL
BA,{x
Aror,E/t
wilnrV,
Ancfi,l
SELF{EpoirrN
\/ERSUS
ffiEffifaffi|PPRoPRATE
Fn,Ee
,,ARC;H,TII,
D/pTALLElr',
- "-#tiH^tffiffcor
ll,er-vss
Excll
RAIE PtoLlcY
'rGE
L,',* Fmrn
iii1fitrliffiipo
X.tdl HtUAtt lt
A HUUP€I{APED RELATKIf,IS}{f,
(xrniltr NofTA, Arryb,ra
HIffiHil.ff'
i'triE
SffiI
FoR nrE
Posr€ocrArlsr EuRopEAir couNrRES:
r*Rqr€i,{ rsocrAt!€ryos(Ar^Lysrsr:
rHEcAsEsruoy
EA
$tFl^noiaAif,,
EraoocEraous cRourm
^'rAI
Fooo Ar{D sEvER^c€ r^ilrF^CruRfrc rlousrR_s
"rHo,oTryEEil
.*"
rEffir.n*Er3s
."*'.
FRor srvss LoucR lEcor{oar/ sorooLs
m1'ffiHXi,.ffi,ffiF**
ro irliiixir-jiidiir
oBa-opED corJrrmr:
tN
**ffi
"*-
e r-ess
nl;#Hlinenlms
iffiilffiv'
*rtffir;#* r"* o#f,^i#fr
*... !ffifi&:
HffiSll$ffi,i[*.
rrx poLrcy HARrcfuqncfi
iio6[In flHfrclL
mo
*
rl*
,,\*.UAUTY Ar^Rsrorr oF
,€]r^vtot'R or n{e
l.rfirpd
S{IEBFO|
cStXC,.il
oF PRoor'filvlrYcHAflGE oF
#iTltsEo{
- run
(Iry, E3rr poarl,
Ssril
.*,ffiffi
*,, *lfiffiIffi"rs
Suloytttot
arDErrcE FoR nao.ilEsn
ttst
R
soc*w -
x^RxEr
Assrsr3xElr
r{EcotrtslRucror{ cofEANtEs
tN
rHArLANo.Ar!AprucAnoil
OUIA|
ffi 'ffiH*tffi
Ssst:3#"ffilliJl*i#Iilnffi tr,!ffi.fftrs,A*Es
Atlo PRoJEcro{'|s oF oEr^ilo FoR
HToHER E[xrcAnot r,. poRruGAL
tr.co*E $lEOlJAUlY, nrE Aito llrtcotE souRcEs
At{ALys€s N crl,t{A
*.uu*ffi!t
SlGtill.l.tn6 tll nrE SIOCX *TRXETS: EVDE
{CE FROI Jt \rEt{?US FC
Vsl.
11
Special issue
2Afi
Angela BESANA
CLUSTER ANALYSIS OII USA UNIVERSITIES
AS REVENUE DIVERSIFIERS DURING
THE FINANCIAL CRISIS
Abstract
For more than ten years, Universities have experienced
an increase in the
complexity of their work and the competitive scenario
that is very crowded, unstable and rather unforeseeable.
on one side, audiences. are multip,re and arways changing in their
esti_
rnates of relationships with universities. On the other
side, uiiversities are al'"'rays looking for diversified revenues, as public
ano private'giant_mat>, The Journal 6r Human Resources
Vol. 32 (3):481-504
13. Halvorsen, R. ParmguisLn (t980) , American Economrc Review Vol.7
2.
-
-
No.3.474475
loslna Purrartutl,
paul illll0r,
Economic Returns to Schooling in
14. Heckman
IuIul
.t
Developed Country:
Evidence for Indonesia
a Less
J, (1979), ,
-
15. Jamison, D. T. J. v. D. Gaag. (1987), , pacific
Economic Review 9(3): 173-189.
18. Miller, P. -charles, M. - Martin, B. (1997), , Economica 64, 131 -54.
19. Mincer, J. (1974), schooling, Earnings and Experience. columbia University
Press: New York
20. okuwa o. B. (20u), aPrivate returns to higher education in Nigeria>, AERC
Research Paper 139. African Economic Researqh consortium, Nairobi.
21. Psacharopoulos, G. (1981),