Report in Brief aon brief final
Limitations with Current Arctic Observations
Despite the long history of arctic observations, long-term records are incomplete, and there are
measurement gaps in all domains. It is also difficult
to compare data across disciplines. Many voids exist
because measurement programs are inadequate or
because of technological limitations created by the
6-1
harsh conditions and remoteness. In addition, some areas have lost measurement capabilities as gauges and
observatories have been decommissioned due to lack
of resources. Declines in surface-based observations
erode the capability to validate satellite imagery, thus
also undermining the usefulness of that data source.
Many of the observational data that do exist
come from specific research projects that collected
data in limited areas for short periods of time. As
such, continuity in time and space is rarely the result
of a larger plan. Most existing science planning efforts
address specific questions, processes, time scales, or
regions, and they gather just the data needed for the
specific project. The overlay of a comprehensive AON
Figure 1. This flow diagram shows how the four essential functions of the AON (large ovals) relate to each other and the
broader stakeholders. The direct connection of AON functions to the stakeholders indicates that the AON builds on and
enhances existing capabilities. The placement of network enhancement at the center of the diagram and its connectivity
to all elements of the network shows how the AON plays an central role in tying together many existing components,
strengthening ties among observation platforms, data centers, and users, and generally supporting and enhancing observing activities of all participants. Graphics by N. Hulbirt and B.G. Bays, jr, University of Hawaii.
could supply the wide-area, long-term observations
needed to track the state of the Arctic and understand
how the system functions as part of the global environmental system.
to satisfy current and future scientific and operational
needs. In its initial phase, the network should monitor
selected key variables consistently across the arctic
system.
Building the New Arctic Observing Network
A number of important internationally coordinated efforts with relevance to observing the arctic
system are being planned for the International Polar
Year 2007-2008 (IPY). During the IPY, there will be a
burst of new and intensive monitoring for a two-year
period that will help jump-start the AON. Experience,
knowledge, and infrastructure gained through the
IPY could advance the AON beyond its existing core
components (e.g., Arctic Monitoring and Assessment
Programme, Co-operative programme for monitoring and evaluation of the long range transmission of
air pollutants in Europe, International Arctic Buoy
Programme, International Tundra Experiment, etc).
Several emerging activities provide timely opportunities to enhance and better coordinate the AON because
they offer access to international partners and capabilities. These include the Global Earth Observation
An integrated, complete, dynamic, and multidisciplinary environmental observing network will
improve society’s understanding of and ability to
respond to ongoing systemic changes in the Arctic
and its capability to anticipate, predict, and respond to
future change both in the Arctic and around the globe.
The data flowing from this network could contribute
to a wide range of programs and activities, including
research studies, decision-support tools, and integrated
environmental assessments that help decision makers understand what is happening and, as appropriate,
adopt adaptation and mitigation measures.
Recommendation 1: An arctic observing network
should be initiated using existing activities and with
the flexibility and resources to expand and improve
Box 1. General Recommendations that Relate to Network Implementation and Operation
Recommendation 3.1a: A system design assessment should be conducted within the first two years of AON development—that is, as a component of IPY—to ensure a pan-arctic, multidisciplinary, integrated network. This effort
should be undertaken by a diverse team, with participation and input from multiple disciplines, stakeholder groups,
and those involved in related international observing activities. The assessment should use existing design studies,
models, statistical approaches, and other tools.
Recommendation 3.1b: The AON should be continuously improved and enhanced by taking advantage of the findings and recommendations in the system design assessment and performance metrics and data provider and user
feedback that will become an enduring feature of the network.
Recommendation 3.2a: The first phase of AON development will require sustaining existing observational capabilities (including those under threat of closure) and filling critical gaps.
Recommendation 3.2b: The AON should support development, testing, and deployment of new sensors and other
network-related technology. In parallel with recognizing the importance of systems engineering and instrument
validation and calibration, this will require supporting (i) expert groups to track advances in technology that satisfy
overarching network needs and (ii) centers of excellence and a technology incubator program to adapt and develop
needed technology.
Recommendation 3.3: A data management system initially built on existing data centers and resources must be
designed and implemented immediately by an AON data management committee to support major functions of the
network. This system should be accessible through a single portal that connects data across disciplines and themes
and should seamlessly link information from arctic sensors, historical datasets, and researchers and other users across
space and time.
Recommendation 3.4a: For the AON to realize its potential, long-term, coordinated, international resources and
efforts should be dedicated to sustaining observing platforms, providing incentives for contributions to the network,
network coordination and integration, communication, and human resource development.
Recommendation 3.4b: Arctic residents must be meaningfully involved in the design and development of all stages
of the AON. From the outset, the system design assessment should cultivate, incorporate, and build on the perspectives of human dimensions research and arctic residents. The AON must learn what is needed to facilitate the involvement of local communities and create an observing network that is useful to them as well as to scientists and other
users.
System of Systems, the Study of Environmental
Arctic Change, the International Study of Arctic
Change, and the Arctic Council’s Consortium for
coordination of Observation and Monitoring of the
Arctic for Assessment and Research.
4. network maintenance and sustainability
(which includes network and observation
sustainability, personnel development,
coordination and integration regionally and
globally, and communication).
Recommendation 2: Work to design and implement an internationally coordinated arctic observing network should begin immediately to take
advantage of a unique window of opportunity
created by a convergence of international activities
during the International Polar Year that focus on
observations.
Progress on all four of these functions is
needed in parallel—in part because different communities and disciplines are at different stages of
development, but also because each function is
critical to development of a comprehensive network. Flexibility to accommodate technological
improvements and changing sensor density is needed from the outset. The report presents detailed
implementation ideas for these essential functions
in its report. Box 1 (p. 3) contains examples of
recommendations specific to network implementation and operation.
The AON will build on existing efforts and
will require new resources (including dedicated
personnel) to fuel its development. The details of
who should take responsibility for such efforts are
outside the report’s purview. Instead, the report
presents fundamental activities that must be organized at the heart of the network and will need constant and focused activity to maintain and enhance
observations and data flow. It is not necessary
that one international body coordinate all of these
activities, but these activities must be developed
under a common framework. The AON would have
four essential functions (see Figure 1, p. 2):
1. observing system development (which
includes assessing complete coverage,
system design and optimization, technology development, and sensor and observer
deployment);
2. data acquisition (which includes maintaining existing observational capabilities and
filling critical gaps);
3. data management, integration, access, and
dissemination; and
Conclusion
Building the Arctic Observing Network will
require international cooperation and support.
Because some areas of the Arctic have more developed monitoring and information systems than
others, it will be critical to engage all arctic nations
from the outset. This report provides a broad vision
for such a network and the next step is for the international community of scientists, operational and
research government agencies, other governmental
and nongovernmental groups, arctic residents, and
industry to take what they find useful from this
vision, refine it, and implement the ideas. Because
many potential components of the network already
exist or are being planned, and because of the surge
of activity during the International Polar Year, there
is an immediate opportunity for major progress.
Committee on Designing an Arctic Observing Network: W. Berry Lyons (Chair),
Chair The Ohio State University,
Columbus: Keith Alverson, Global Ocean Observing System Project Office at the Intergovernmental Oceanographic
Commission of UNESCO, Paris; David Barber, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada; James G. Bellingham,
Monterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute, Moss Landing, CA; Terry V. Callaghan, University of Sheffield, UK;
Abisko Scientific Research Station, Sweden; Lee W. Cooper, University of Tennessee, Knoxville; Margo Edwards,
University of Hawaii, Honolulu; Shari Gearheard, University of Western Ontario, Canada; Molly McCammon,
Alaska Ocean Observing System, Anchorage; Jamie Morison, Polar Science Center, Seattle, Washington; Scott E.
Palo, University of Colorado, Boulder; Andrey Proshutinsky, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, MA; LarsOtto Reiersen, Arctic Monitoring and Assessment Programme, Oslo, Norway; Vladimir E. Romanovsky, University
of Alaska, Fairbanks; Peter Schlosser, Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory, Palisades, NY; Julienne C. Stroeve, National Snow and Ice Data Center, Boulder, CO; Craig Tweedie, University of Texas, El Paso; John Walsh, University
of Alaska, Fairbanks; Paul Cutler (Study
Study Director
Director), Polar Research Board.
This report brief was prepared by the National Research Council based on the committee’s report. For
more information, contact the Polar Research Board at (202) 334-3479 or visit http://dels.nas.edu/prb.
Copies of Toward an Integrated Arctic Observing Network are available from the National Academies Press,
500 Fifth Street, NW, Washington, D.C. 20001; (800) 624-6242; www.nap.edu.
© 2006 The National Academy of Sciences
Despite the long history of arctic observations, long-term records are incomplete, and there are
measurement gaps in all domains. It is also difficult
to compare data across disciplines. Many voids exist
because measurement programs are inadequate or
because of technological limitations created by the
6-1
harsh conditions and remoteness. In addition, some areas have lost measurement capabilities as gauges and
observatories have been decommissioned due to lack
of resources. Declines in surface-based observations
erode the capability to validate satellite imagery, thus
also undermining the usefulness of that data source.
Many of the observational data that do exist
come from specific research projects that collected
data in limited areas for short periods of time. As
such, continuity in time and space is rarely the result
of a larger plan. Most existing science planning efforts
address specific questions, processes, time scales, or
regions, and they gather just the data needed for the
specific project. The overlay of a comprehensive AON
Figure 1. This flow diagram shows how the four essential functions of the AON (large ovals) relate to each other and the
broader stakeholders. The direct connection of AON functions to the stakeholders indicates that the AON builds on and
enhances existing capabilities. The placement of network enhancement at the center of the diagram and its connectivity
to all elements of the network shows how the AON plays an central role in tying together many existing components,
strengthening ties among observation platforms, data centers, and users, and generally supporting and enhancing observing activities of all participants. Graphics by N. Hulbirt and B.G. Bays, jr, University of Hawaii.
could supply the wide-area, long-term observations
needed to track the state of the Arctic and understand
how the system functions as part of the global environmental system.
to satisfy current and future scientific and operational
needs. In its initial phase, the network should monitor
selected key variables consistently across the arctic
system.
Building the New Arctic Observing Network
A number of important internationally coordinated efforts with relevance to observing the arctic
system are being planned for the International Polar
Year 2007-2008 (IPY). During the IPY, there will be a
burst of new and intensive monitoring for a two-year
period that will help jump-start the AON. Experience,
knowledge, and infrastructure gained through the
IPY could advance the AON beyond its existing core
components (e.g., Arctic Monitoring and Assessment
Programme, Co-operative programme for monitoring and evaluation of the long range transmission of
air pollutants in Europe, International Arctic Buoy
Programme, International Tundra Experiment, etc).
Several emerging activities provide timely opportunities to enhance and better coordinate the AON because
they offer access to international partners and capabilities. These include the Global Earth Observation
An integrated, complete, dynamic, and multidisciplinary environmental observing network will
improve society’s understanding of and ability to
respond to ongoing systemic changes in the Arctic
and its capability to anticipate, predict, and respond to
future change both in the Arctic and around the globe.
The data flowing from this network could contribute
to a wide range of programs and activities, including
research studies, decision-support tools, and integrated
environmental assessments that help decision makers understand what is happening and, as appropriate,
adopt adaptation and mitigation measures.
Recommendation 1: An arctic observing network
should be initiated using existing activities and with
the flexibility and resources to expand and improve
Box 1. General Recommendations that Relate to Network Implementation and Operation
Recommendation 3.1a: A system design assessment should be conducted within the first two years of AON development—that is, as a component of IPY—to ensure a pan-arctic, multidisciplinary, integrated network. This effort
should be undertaken by a diverse team, with participation and input from multiple disciplines, stakeholder groups,
and those involved in related international observing activities. The assessment should use existing design studies,
models, statistical approaches, and other tools.
Recommendation 3.1b: The AON should be continuously improved and enhanced by taking advantage of the findings and recommendations in the system design assessment and performance metrics and data provider and user
feedback that will become an enduring feature of the network.
Recommendation 3.2a: The first phase of AON development will require sustaining existing observational capabilities (including those under threat of closure) and filling critical gaps.
Recommendation 3.2b: The AON should support development, testing, and deployment of new sensors and other
network-related technology. In parallel with recognizing the importance of systems engineering and instrument
validation and calibration, this will require supporting (i) expert groups to track advances in technology that satisfy
overarching network needs and (ii) centers of excellence and a technology incubator program to adapt and develop
needed technology.
Recommendation 3.3: A data management system initially built on existing data centers and resources must be
designed and implemented immediately by an AON data management committee to support major functions of the
network. This system should be accessible through a single portal that connects data across disciplines and themes
and should seamlessly link information from arctic sensors, historical datasets, and researchers and other users across
space and time.
Recommendation 3.4a: For the AON to realize its potential, long-term, coordinated, international resources and
efforts should be dedicated to sustaining observing platforms, providing incentives for contributions to the network,
network coordination and integration, communication, and human resource development.
Recommendation 3.4b: Arctic residents must be meaningfully involved in the design and development of all stages
of the AON. From the outset, the system design assessment should cultivate, incorporate, and build on the perspectives of human dimensions research and arctic residents. The AON must learn what is needed to facilitate the involvement of local communities and create an observing network that is useful to them as well as to scientists and other
users.
System of Systems, the Study of Environmental
Arctic Change, the International Study of Arctic
Change, and the Arctic Council’s Consortium for
coordination of Observation and Monitoring of the
Arctic for Assessment and Research.
4. network maintenance and sustainability
(which includes network and observation
sustainability, personnel development,
coordination and integration regionally and
globally, and communication).
Recommendation 2: Work to design and implement an internationally coordinated arctic observing network should begin immediately to take
advantage of a unique window of opportunity
created by a convergence of international activities
during the International Polar Year that focus on
observations.
Progress on all four of these functions is
needed in parallel—in part because different communities and disciplines are at different stages of
development, but also because each function is
critical to development of a comprehensive network. Flexibility to accommodate technological
improvements and changing sensor density is needed from the outset. The report presents detailed
implementation ideas for these essential functions
in its report. Box 1 (p. 3) contains examples of
recommendations specific to network implementation and operation.
The AON will build on existing efforts and
will require new resources (including dedicated
personnel) to fuel its development. The details of
who should take responsibility for such efforts are
outside the report’s purview. Instead, the report
presents fundamental activities that must be organized at the heart of the network and will need constant and focused activity to maintain and enhance
observations and data flow. It is not necessary
that one international body coordinate all of these
activities, but these activities must be developed
under a common framework. The AON would have
four essential functions (see Figure 1, p. 2):
1. observing system development (which
includes assessing complete coverage,
system design and optimization, technology development, and sensor and observer
deployment);
2. data acquisition (which includes maintaining existing observational capabilities and
filling critical gaps);
3. data management, integration, access, and
dissemination; and
Conclusion
Building the Arctic Observing Network will
require international cooperation and support.
Because some areas of the Arctic have more developed monitoring and information systems than
others, it will be critical to engage all arctic nations
from the outset. This report provides a broad vision
for such a network and the next step is for the international community of scientists, operational and
research government agencies, other governmental
and nongovernmental groups, arctic residents, and
industry to take what they find useful from this
vision, refine it, and implement the ideas. Because
many potential components of the network already
exist or are being planned, and because of the surge
of activity during the International Polar Year, there
is an immediate opportunity for major progress.
Committee on Designing an Arctic Observing Network: W. Berry Lyons (Chair),
Chair The Ohio State University,
Columbus: Keith Alverson, Global Ocean Observing System Project Office at the Intergovernmental Oceanographic
Commission of UNESCO, Paris; David Barber, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada; James G. Bellingham,
Monterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute, Moss Landing, CA; Terry V. Callaghan, University of Sheffield, UK;
Abisko Scientific Research Station, Sweden; Lee W. Cooper, University of Tennessee, Knoxville; Margo Edwards,
University of Hawaii, Honolulu; Shari Gearheard, University of Western Ontario, Canada; Molly McCammon,
Alaska Ocean Observing System, Anchorage; Jamie Morison, Polar Science Center, Seattle, Washington; Scott E.
Palo, University of Colorado, Boulder; Andrey Proshutinsky, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, MA; LarsOtto Reiersen, Arctic Monitoring and Assessment Programme, Oslo, Norway; Vladimir E. Romanovsky, University
of Alaska, Fairbanks; Peter Schlosser, Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory, Palisades, NY; Julienne C. Stroeve, National Snow and Ice Data Center, Boulder, CO; Craig Tweedie, University of Texas, El Paso; John Walsh, University
of Alaska, Fairbanks; Paul Cutler (Study
Study Director
Director), Polar Research Board.
This report brief was prepared by the National Research Council based on the committee’s report. For
more information, contact the Polar Research Board at (202) 334-3479 or visit http://dels.nas.edu/prb.
Copies of Toward an Integrated Arctic Observing Network are available from the National Academies Press,
500 Fifth Street, NW, Washington, D.C. 20001; (800) 624-6242; www.nap.edu.
© 2006 The National Academy of Sciences