JUWITA G2A009065 BAB 8
DAFTAR PUSTAKA
1. Guyton and Hall. Buku Ajar Fisiologi Kedokteran. Edisi ke 11. Jakarta: EGC.
2007; 244-57.
2. Price SA, Wilson LM. Patofisiologi Konsep Klinis Proses-Proses Penyakit. Edisi
ke 6. Jakarta: EGC. 2005; 530-45.
3. Tim Bagian Anestesiologi dan Terapi Intensif FK Undip/RSUP Dr.Kariadi
Semarang. Anestesiologi. Semarang: Bagian Anestesiologi dan terapi Intensif
Fakultas Kedokteran Undip/RSUP Dr.Kariadi Semarang. 2010; 295-307.
4. SIGN. Postoperative management in adults: A practical guide to postoperative care
for clinical staff. Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network. 2004.
5. Arras, Margarete. Assessment of post-laparotomy pain in laboratory mice by
telemetric recording of heart rate and heart rate variability. BMC Veterinary
Research, 2007(3);16:1-8
6. Departemen Farmakologi dan Terapi FKUI. (2007). Farmakologi dan terapi Ed.5.
Jakarta : Balai Penerbit FKUI. 259-266;314-330.
7. Charapov, Ilia et all. Intraoperative Lidocaine Infusion Analgesia Trial. Ottawa
Anesthesia. 2007.
8. . Kestin, I. Control of Heart Rate. Update in Anesthesia. 1993 (3):1.
9. Physiology
of
Cardiac
Conduction.
Accessed
from
www.rnceus.com/ekg/ekgphys.html. Accessed on October 9, 2012.
10. The Heartbeat Cardiac Physiology. Accessed from www.as.miami.edu. Accessed
on October 10, 2012.
11. Louise Vigneault, MD, et al. Perioperative intravenous lidocaine infusion for
postoperative pain control : a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Canadian J.Anesthesiologists Society, 2011;58:22-37.
12. BK Baral, et al. Perioperative intravenous lidocaine infusion on postoperative pain
relief in patients undergoing upper abdominal surgery.Nepal Med Coll J, 2010;
12(4): 215-220.
13. Barros de Oliveira, Caio Marcio, et al. Intraoperative intravenous
lidocaine.Revista Brasileira de Anestesiologia, 2010;60(3): 325-333.
14. Weihua Cui, et al. Systemic administration of lidocain reduces morphine
requirements and postoperative pain of patients undergoing thoracic surgery after
propofol-remifentanil-based anaesthesia. European Journal of Anesthesiology,
2010;27:41- 6.
15. Kaba.A, et al. Acute rehabilitation program after laparascopic colectomy using
intravenous lidocain. Annual Meeting of the European Society of
Anesthesiologists, 2005;105:53- 8.
16. Koppert, Wolfgang ,et al. Perioperative intravenous lidocaine has preventive
effects on postoperative pain and morphine consumption after major abdominal
surgery. Anesth Analg,2004;98:1050 - 5.
17. Kazuto Omiya,et al. Heart Rate Response to Symphatetic Nervous Stimulation,
Exercise, and Magnesium Concentration in Various Sleep Conditions.
International Journal of Sport Nutrition and Exercise Metabolism,2009,19,127135.
18. Scott B. Groudine, MD, et al. Intravenous lidocaine speeds the return of bowel
function, decreases postoperative pain, and shortens hospital stay in patients
undergoing radical retopubic prostatectomy. Anesth Analg, 1998;86:235-9.
19. Anas Tamsuri, (2006). Konsep dan Penatalaksanaan Nyeri. Penerbit Buku
Kedokteran. Jakarta : EGC
20. Marret E, Rolin M, Beaussier M, Bonnet F. Meta-analysis of intravenous lidocaine
and postoperative recovery after abdominal surgery. Br J Surg 2008; 95: 1331-8.
21. McCarthy GC, Megalla SA, Habib AS. Impact of intravenous lidocaine infusion on
postoperative analgesia and recovery from surgery: a systematic review of
randomized controlled trials. Drugs 2010; 70: 1149-63.
22. Alexander & Hill, (1987). Post Operative Pain. Oxford : Black Well Scientific Publ
23. Kasten GW, Owens E. Evaluation of lidocaine as an adjunct to fentanyl anesthesia
for coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Anesth Analg 1986; 65: 511-5.
24. Mathew JP, Mackensen GB, Phillips-Bute B, et al. Randomized, double-blinded,
placebo controlled study of neuroprotection with lidocaine in cardiac surgery.
Stroke 2009; 40: 880-7.
25. Abdourahamane Kaba, MD, et al. Intravenous lidocaine infusion facilitates acute
rehabilitation after laparoscopic colectomy.
American Society of
Anesthesiologists, 2007; 106:11-8.
26. Caio Marcio Barros de Oliveira, TSA, et al. Intraoperative intravenous
lidocaine.Revista Brasileira de Anestesiologia, 2010;60(3): 325-333.
27. Marsaban A, Maas EM, Bagianto H. Ilmu Pengetahuan Dasar, Mekanisme
Fisiologi Nyeri. In: Chandra S. Panduan Tatalaksana Nyeri Perioperatif. Jakarta :
Perhimpunan Dokter Spesialis Anestesiologi dan Reanimasi Indonesia.2009;1-25.
28. Ganong, William F. Buku Ajar Fisiologi Kedokteran.Jakarta:EGC.2002: 532-5.
29. Singh M. Stress response and anesthesia altering the pre and post-operative
management. Indian J Anesth; 2003: 47:427-34.
30. Hartawan, dr.Dicky. Efektivitas Pemberian Lidocain Intravena 1,5mg/kg/jam
terhadap Nyeri Pasca Laparatomi. 2012. Departemen/SMF Anestesiologi dan
Terapi Intensif Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Diponegoro.
31. Flemming DC, Orkin Fk, Kirby RR. Hazards of tracheal intubation. In: Nikolous
G, Robert RK. Complication in anesthesiology. 2nd ed. Philadelphia:
Lippincottraven; 1996: 229-37
32. Arif, Syafri Kamsul. Perioperative Ischemic and Infark Miokard. The Indonesian
Journal of Medical Science,2009 (1):490-501.
33. Constantino, Robert. Cardiovasculer Effects of Lidocaine. The Annals Thoracic of
Surgery,1999(8):425-36.
34. Ramundus, Alex Bin. Pengaruh Lidokain Intravena 1,5mg/kgBB terhadap
Gejolak Kardiovaskuler pada Tindakan laringoskopi dan Intubasi. 2009.
Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Diponegoro.
35. Atmawan,Derajad Bayu. Perbedaan Tekanan Darah, Laju Jantung dan Rate
Pressure Product (RPP) Pada Pemberian Lidokain 1,5 Mg/Kgbb Intravena
Sebelum Intubasi Dibandingkan Pemasangan Laryngeal Mask Airway (LMA).
Jurnal Anestesiologi Indonesia, 2013 (5):11-20.
LAMPIRAN 1. HASIL UJI STATISTIK
Descriptives
Statistic
Heart Rate jam ke 0
Mean
95% Confidence Interval for
Mean
75.25
Lower Bound
72.13
Upper Bound
78.37
5% Trimmed Mean
75.42
Median
75.00
Variance
1.506
54.457
Std. Deviation
Heart Rate jam ke 48
Std. Error
7.379
Minimum
60
Maximum
88
Range
28
Interquartile Range
10
Skewness
-.371
.472
Kurtosis
-.026
.918
Mean
82.33
1.715
95% Confidence Interval for
Mean
Lower Bound
78.79
Upper Bound
85.88
5% Trimmed Mean
82.87
Median
84.00
Variance
Std. Deviation
70.580
8.401
Minimum
63
Maximum
92
Range
29
Interquartile Range
12
Skewness
Kurtosis
-1.058
.472
.536
.918
Tests of Normality
a
Kolmogorov-Smirnov
Statistic
Df
Shapiro-Wilk
Sig.
Statistic
df
Sig.
Heart Rate jam ke 0
.139
24
.200
*
.955
24
.341
Heart Rate jam ke 48
.329
24
.000
.835
24
.001
a. Lilliefors Significance Correction
*. This is a lower bound of the true significance.
Tests of Normality
a
Kolmogorov-Smirnov
Statistic
hr_48_transf
Df
.343
Shapiro-Wilk
Sig.
24
Statistic
df
.000
.810
N
Mean Rank
Sig.
24
.000
a. Lilliefors Significance Correction
NPar Tests
Wilcoxon Signed Ranks Test
Ranks
Heart Rate jam ke 48 Heart Rate jam ke 0
a
4.86
34.00
b
15.65
266.00
Negative Ranks
7
Positive Ranks
17
c
Ties
0
Total
24
a. Heart Rate jam ke 48 < Heart Rate jam ke 0
b. Heart Rate jam ke 48 > Heart Rate jam ke 0
c. Heart Rate jam ke 48 = Heart Rate jam ke 0
Test Statistics
b
Heart Rate jam
ke 48 - Heart
Rate jam ke 0
Z
Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed)
a. Based on negative ranks.
a
-3.320
.001
Sum of Ranks
Test Statistics
b
Heart Rate jam
ke 48 - Heart
Rate jam ke 0
a
Z
-3.320
Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed)
.001
a. Based on negative ranks.
b. Wilcoxon Signed Ranks Test
T-Test
Group Statistics
Jenis Kelamin
Responden
Heart Rate jam ke 0
N
Mean
laki-laki
perempuan
Std. Deviation
Std. Error Mean
8
73.63
9.826
3.474
16
76.06
6.027
1.507
Independent Samples Test
Levene's Test for
Equality of Variances
F
Heart Rate jam ke 0
Equal
variances
Sig.
2.641
t-test for Equality of Means
t
.118
Sig. (2-
df
tailed)
Mean Difference
Std. Error
Difference
-.756
22
.458
-2.438
3.2
-.644
9.721
.535
-2.438
3.7
assumed
Equal
variances not
assumed
Descriptives
Statistic
Umur Responden
Mean
95% Confidence Interval for
Mean
51.04
Lower Bound
47.76
Upper Bound
54.32
Std. Error
1.585
5% Trimmed Mean
50.55
Median
50.00
Variance
60.303
Std. Deviation
7.765
Minimum
42
Maximum
69
Range
27
Interquartile Range
5
Skewness
1.315
.472
Kurtosis
1.047
.918
Tests of Normality
a
Kolmogorov-Smirnov
Statistic
Umur Responden
df
Shapiro-Wilk
Sig.
.303
24
Statistic
.000
df
Sig.
.807
24
.000
a. Lilliefors Significance Correction
Tests of Normality
a
Kolmogorov-Smirnov
Statistic
umur_transf
Df
.280
Shapiro-Wilk
Sig.
24
Statistic
.000
.847
df
Sig.
24
.002
a. Lilliefors Significance Correction
Correlations
Umur
Heart Rate jam
Responden
Spearman's rho
Umur Responden
Correlation Coefficient
Sig. (2-tailed)
N
Heart Rate jam ke 0
Correlation Coefficient
Sig. (2-tailed)
N
ke 0
1.000
-.090
.
.675
24
24
-.090
1.000
.675
.
24
24
Tests of Normality
a
Kolmogorov-Smirnov
Statistic
Berat Badan Responden
Df
.192
Shapiro-Wilk
Sig.
24
Statistic
.022
df
Sig.
.923
24
a. Lilliefors Significance Correction
Correlations
Berat Badan
Heart Rate jam
Responden
Berat Badan Responden
Pearson Correlation
ke 0
1
Sig. (2-tailed)
.237
N
Heart Rate jam ke 0
24
24
Pearson Correlation
.251
1
Sig. (2-tailed)
.237
N
24
Statistics
Umur
Berat Badan
Responden
N
Valid
Responden
24
24
0
0
Mean
51.04
56.25
Median
50.00
54.50
Std. Deviation
7.765
12.453
Missing
.251
24
.067
LAMPIRAN 2. DOKUMENTASI PENELITIAN
LAMPIRAN 3. ETHICAL CLEARANCE
LAMPIRAN
Identitas
Nama
: Juwita Kusumadewi
NIM
: G2A009065
Tempat/tanggal lahir : Semarang, 14 Juni 1991
Jenis kelamin
: Perempuan
Alamat
: Jl Pucang Karya Raya no.7 Pucang Gading, Semarang
Nomor Telpon
: 02476727293
Nomor HP
: 085640961991
e-mail
: [email protected]
Riwayat Pendidikan Formal
1. SD
: SDN Batursari 6
Lulus tahun
: 2003
2. SMP
: SMP Negeri 2 Semarang
Lulus tahun
: 2006
3. SMA
: SMA Negeri 5 Semarang
Lulus tahun
: 2009
4. FK UNDIP : Masuk tahun : 2009
1. Guyton and Hall. Buku Ajar Fisiologi Kedokteran. Edisi ke 11. Jakarta: EGC.
2007; 244-57.
2. Price SA, Wilson LM. Patofisiologi Konsep Klinis Proses-Proses Penyakit. Edisi
ke 6. Jakarta: EGC. 2005; 530-45.
3. Tim Bagian Anestesiologi dan Terapi Intensif FK Undip/RSUP Dr.Kariadi
Semarang. Anestesiologi. Semarang: Bagian Anestesiologi dan terapi Intensif
Fakultas Kedokteran Undip/RSUP Dr.Kariadi Semarang. 2010; 295-307.
4. SIGN. Postoperative management in adults: A practical guide to postoperative care
for clinical staff. Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network. 2004.
5. Arras, Margarete. Assessment of post-laparotomy pain in laboratory mice by
telemetric recording of heart rate and heart rate variability. BMC Veterinary
Research, 2007(3);16:1-8
6. Departemen Farmakologi dan Terapi FKUI. (2007). Farmakologi dan terapi Ed.5.
Jakarta : Balai Penerbit FKUI. 259-266;314-330.
7. Charapov, Ilia et all. Intraoperative Lidocaine Infusion Analgesia Trial. Ottawa
Anesthesia. 2007.
8. . Kestin, I. Control of Heart Rate. Update in Anesthesia. 1993 (3):1.
9. Physiology
of
Cardiac
Conduction.
Accessed
from
www.rnceus.com/ekg/ekgphys.html. Accessed on October 9, 2012.
10. The Heartbeat Cardiac Physiology. Accessed from www.as.miami.edu. Accessed
on October 10, 2012.
11. Louise Vigneault, MD, et al. Perioperative intravenous lidocaine infusion for
postoperative pain control : a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Canadian J.Anesthesiologists Society, 2011;58:22-37.
12. BK Baral, et al. Perioperative intravenous lidocaine infusion on postoperative pain
relief in patients undergoing upper abdominal surgery.Nepal Med Coll J, 2010;
12(4): 215-220.
13. Barros de Oliveira, Caio Marcio, et al. Intraoperative intravenous
lidocaine.Revista Brasileira de Anestesiologia, 2010;60(3): 325-333.
14. Weihua Cui, et al. Systemic administration of lidocain reduces morphine
requirements and postoperative pain of patients undergoing thoracic surgery after
propofol-remifentanil-based anaesthesia. European Journal of Anesthesiology,
2010;27:41- 6.
15. Kaba.A, et al. Acute rehabilitation program after laparascopic colectomy using
intravenous lidocain. Annual Meeting of the European Society of
Anesthesiologists, 2005;105:53- 8.
16. Koppert, Wolfgang ,et al. Perioperative intravenous lidocaine has preventive
effects on postoperative pain and morphine consumption after major abdominal
surgery. Anesth Analg,2004;98:1050 - 5.
17. Kazuto Omiya,et al. Heart Rate Response to Symphatetic Nervous Stimulation,
Exercise, and Magnesium Concentration in Various Sleep Conditions.
International Journal of Sport Nutrition and Exercise Metabolism,2009,19,127135.
18. Scott B. Groudine, MD, et al. Intravenous lidocaine speeds the return of bowel
function, decreases postoperative pain, and shortens hospital stay in patients
undergoing radical retopubic prostatectomy. Anesth Analg, 1998;86:235-9.
19. Anas Tamsuri, (2006). Konsep dan Penatalaksanaan Nyeri. Penerbit Buku
Kedokteran. Jakarta : EGC
20. Marret E, Rolin M, Beaussier M, Bonnet F. Meta-analysis of intravenous lidocaine
and postoperative recovery after abdominal surgery. Br J Surg 2008; 95: 1331-8.
21. McCarthy GC, Megalla SA, Habib AS. Impact of intravenous lidocaine infusion on
postoperative analgesia and recovery from surgery: a systematic review of
randomized controlled trials. Drugs 2010; 70: 1149-63.
22. Alexander & Hill, (1987). Post Operative Pain. Oxford : Black Well Scientific Publ
23. Kasten GW, Owens E. Evaluation of lidocaine as an adjunct to fentanyl anesthesia
for coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Anesth Analg 1986; 65: 511-5.
24. Mathew JP, Mackensen GB, Phillips-Bute B, et al. Randomized, double-blinded,
placebo controlled study of neuroprotection with lidocaine in cardiac surgery.
Stroke 2009; 40: 880-7.
25. Abdourahamane Kaba, MD, et al. Intravenous lidocaine infusion facilitates acute
rehabilitation after laparoscopic colectomy.
American Society of
Anesthesiologists, 2007; 106:11-8.
26. Caio Marcio Barros de Oliveira, TSA, et al. Intraoperative intravenous
lidocaine.Revista Brasileira de Anestesiologia, 2010;60(3): 325-333.
27. Marsaban A, Maas EM, Bagianto H. Ilmu Pengetahuan Dasar, Mekanisme
Fisiologi Nyeri. In: Chandra S. Panduan Tatalaksana Nyeri Perioperatif. Jakarta :
Perhimpunan Dokter Spesialis Anestesiologi dan Reanimasi Indonesia.2009;1-25.
28. Ganong, William F. Buku Ajar Fisiologi Kedokteran.Jakarta:EGC.2002: 532-5.
29. Singh M. Stress response and anesthesia altering the pre and post-operative
management. Indian J Anesth; 2003: 47:427-34.
30. Hartawan, dr.Dicky. Efektivitas Pemberian Lidocain Intravena 1,5mg/kg/jam
terhadap Nyeri Pasca Laparatomi. 2012. Departemen/SMF Anestesiologi dan
Terapi Intensif Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Diponegoro.
31. Flemming DC, Orkin Fk, Kirby RR. Hazards of tracheal intubation. In: Nikolous
G, Robert RK. Complication in anesthesiology. 2nd ed. Philadelphia:
Lippincottraven; 1996: 229-37
32. Arif, Syafri Kamsul. Perioperative Ischemic and Infark Miokard. The Indonesian
Journal of Medical Science,2009 (1):490-501.
33. Constantino, Robert. Cardiovasculer Effects of Lidocaine. The Annals Thoracic of
Surgery,1999(8):425-36.
34. Ramundus, Alex Bin. Pengaruh Lidokain Intravena 1,5mg/kgBB terhadap
Gejolak Kardiovaskuler pada Tindakan laringoskopi dan Intubasi. 2009.
Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Diponegoro.
35. Atmawan,Derajad Bayu. Perbedaan Tekanan Darah, Laju Jantung dan Rate
Pressure Product (RPP) Pada Pemberian Lidokain 1,5 Mg/Kgbb Intravena
Sebelum Intubasi Dibandingkan Pemasangan Laryngeal Mask Airway (LMA).
Jurnal Anestesiologi Indonesia, 2013 (5):11-20.
LAMPIRAN 1. HASIL UJI STATISTIK
Descriptives
Statistic
Heart Rate jam ke 0
Mean
95% Confidence Interval for
Mean
75.25
Lower Bound
72.13
Upper Bound
78.37
5% Trimmed Mean
75.42
Median
75.00
Variance
1.506
54.457
Std. Deviation
Heart Rate jam ke 48
Std. Error
7.379
Minimum
60
Maximum
88
Range
28
Interquartile Range
10
Skewness
-.371
.472
Kurtosis
-.026
.918
Mean
82.33
1.715
95% Confidence Interval for
Mean
Lower Bound
78.79
Upper Bound
85.88
5% Trimmed Mean
82.87
Median
84.00
Variance
Std. Deviation
70.580
8.401
Minimum
63
Maximum
92
Range
29
Interquartile Range
12
Skewness
Kurtosis
-1.058
.472
.536
.918
Tests of Normality
a
Kolmogorov-Smirnov
Statistic
Df
Shapiro-Wilk
Sig.
Statistic
df
Sig.
Heart Rate jam ke 0
.139
24
.200
*
.955
24
.341
Heart Rate jam ke 48
.329
24
.000
.835
24
.001
a. Lilliefors Significance Correction
*. This is a lower bound of the true significance.
Tests of Normality
a
Kolmogorov-Smirnov
Statistic
hr_48_transf
Df
.343
Shapiro-Wilk
Sig.
24
Statistic
df
.000
.810
N
Mean Rank
Sig.
24
.000
a. Lilliefors Significance Correction
NPar Tests
Wilcoxon Signed Ranks Test
Ranks
Heart Rate jam ke 48 Heart Rate jam ke 0
a
4.86
34.00
b
15.65
266.00
Negative Ranks
7
Positive Ranks
17
c
Ties
0
Total
24
a. Heart Rate jam ke 48 < Heart Rate jam ke 0
b. Heart Rate jam ke 48 > Heart Rate jam ke 0
c. Heart Rate jam ke 48 = Heart Rate jam ke 0
Test Statistics
b
Heart Rate jam
ke 48 - Heart
Rate jam ke 0
Z
Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed)
a. Based on negative ranks.
a
-3.320
.001
Sum of Ranks
Test Statistics
b
Heart Rate jam
ke 48 - Heart
Rate jam ke 0
a
Z
-3.320
Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed)
.001
a. Based on negative ranks.
b. Wilcoxon Signed Ranks Test
T-Test
Group Statistics
Jenis Kelamin
Responden
Heart Rate jam ke 0
N
Mean
laki-laki
perempuan
Std. Deviation
Std. Error Mean
8
73.63
9.826
3.474
16
76.06
6.027
1.507
Independent Samples Test
Levene's Test for
Equality of Variances
F
Heart Rate jam ke 0
Equal
variances
Sig.
2.641
t-test for Equality of Means
t
.118
Sig. (2-
df
tailed)
Mean Difference
Std. Error
Difference
-.756
22
.458
-2.438
3.2
-.644
9.721
.535
-2.438
3.7
assumed
Equal
variances not
assumed
Descriptives
Statistic
Umur Responden
Mean
95% Confidence Interval for
Mean
51.04
Lower Bound
47.76
Upper Bound
54.32
Std. Error
1.585
5% Trimmed Mean
50.55
Median
50.00
Variance
60.303
Std. Deviation
7.765
Minimum
42
Maximum
69
Range
27
Interquartile Range
5
Skewness
1.315
.472
Kurtosis
1.047
.918
Tests of Normality
a
Kolmogorov-Smirnov
Statistic
Umur Responden
df
Shapiro-Wilk
Sig.
.303
24
Statistic
.000
df
Sig.
.807
24
.000
a. Lilliefors Significance Correction
Tests of Normality
a
Kolmogorov-Smirnov
Statistic
umur_transf
Df
.280
Shapiro-Wilk
Sig.
24
Statistic
.000
.847
df
Sig.
24
.002
a. Lilliefors Significance Correction
Correlations
Umur
Heart Rate jam
Responden
Spearman's rho
Umur Responden
Correlation Coefficient
Sig. (2-tailed)
N
Heart Rate jam ke 0
Correlation Coefficient
Sig. (2-tailed)
N
ke 0
1.000
-.090
.
.675
24
24
-.090
1.000
.675
.
24
24
Tests of Normality
a
Kolmogorov-Smirnov
Statistic
Berat Badan Responden
Df
.192
Shapiro-Wilk
Sig.
24
Statistic
.022
df
Sig.
.923
24
a. Lilliefors Significance Correction
Correlations
Berat Badan
Heart Rate jam
Responden
Berat Badan Responden
Pearson Correlation
ke 0
1
Sig. (2-tailed)
.237
N
Heart Rate jam ke 0
24
24
Pearson Correlation
.251
1
Sig. (2-tailed)
.237
N
24
Statistics
Umur
Berat Badan
Responden
N
Valid
Responden
24
24
0
0
Mean
51.04
56.25
Median
50.00
54.50
Std. Deviation
7.765
12.453
Missing
.251
24
.067
LAMPIRAN 2. DOKUMENTASI PENELITIAN
LAMPIRAN 3. ETHICAL CLEARANCE
LAMPIRAN
Identitas
Nama
: Juwita Kusumadewi
NIM
: G2A009065
Tempat/tanggal lahir : Semarang, 14 Juni 1991
Jenis kelamin
: Perempuan
Alamat
: Jl Pucang Karya Raya no.7 Pucang Gading, Semarang
Nomor Telpon
: 02476727293
Nomor HP
: 085640961991
: [email protected]
Riwayat Pendidikan Formal
1. SD
: SDN Batursari 6
Lulus tahun
: 2003
2. SMP
: SMP Negeri 2 Semarang
Lulus tahun
: 2006
3. SMA
: SMA Negeri 5 Semarang
Lulus tahun
: 2009
4. FK UNDIP : Masuk tahun : 2009