FAKTOR YANG BERHUBUNGAN DENGAN STATUS GIZI SISWAI SD JUARA MEDAN

CURRICULUM VITAE

  Nama : Moehammad Al Ghazali Loebis Tempat / tanggal lahir : Medan/ 22 – 12 - 1993 Pekerjaan : Mahasiswa Agama : Islam Alamat : Komp. Tasbih Blok B No.17 A Nomor Telepon : 089627537141 Orang Tua : Prof. Dr. H. M. Nawawi Loebis M phil.Ph-D (Ayah) Hj. Pristiwani Mei Hilda (Ibu) Riwayat Pendidikan : SD YP Shafiyyatul Amaliah Medan (1998 – 2004) SMP YP Shafiyyatul Amaliah Medan (2004 – 2007)

  SMA YP Shafiyyatul Amaliah Medan (2007 – 2010)

Fakultas Kedokteran USU (2010 – sekarang)

Kegiatan : Melakukan proposal penelitian untuk mengetahui faktor fakor penyebab kurang gizi pada siswa - siswi

  SD Juara Medan KUESIONER

FAKTOR YANG BERHUBUNGAN DENGAN STATUS GIZI SISWA/I SD JUARA MEDAN

  Alamat Responden : Identitas Responden

• Nama :
• Umur :
• Pekerjaan :
• Pendapatan per bulan : Pendidikan : a.

  Tidak Sekolah/tidak tamat SD b.

  Tamat SD c. Tamat SLTP d.

  Tamat SLTA e. Tamat Akademi f. Sarjana Jumlah anak :

  Identitas Anak

• Nama :
• Umur :
• Jenis kelamin : Pola Makan 1.

  Apakah pola makan teratur (3 kali sehari) ? a. Ya b.

  Tidak

  2. Apakah Anda memasak sendiri makanan yang dihidangkan kepada anak Anda? a.

1. Sumber air minum keluarga a.

  PAM/Sumur bor c. Air kemasan 2.

  c. beninig, tidak berasa dan berbau

  Kondisi air minum a.Keruh, berasa dan bebau

  Kadang-kandang di masak c. Di masak sampai mendidih 3.

  Tidak di masak b.

  Kebiasaan minum keluarga a.

  Sumur gali b.

  Ya b.

  Tidak Faktor Lingkungan

  Ya b.

  Tidak 4. Apakah makanan yang dihidangkan mengikuti kaidah 4 Sehat 5 sempurna? a.

  Ya b.

  3. Apakah Anda memperhatikan kebersihan makanan yang dihidangkan kepada anak anda? a.

  Tidak ( Sebutkan cara anda mendapatkan makanan tersebut …………………………)

b. Bening, tidak berasa dan berbau

4. Tipe jamban a.

  Cemplung b.

  Jamban leher angsa c. Closet 5.

  Keadaan jamban a.

  Tidak terawat sama sekali b.

  Jarang dibersihkan c. Terawat dan bersih 6.

  Jenis tempat pembuangan sampah a.

  Tidak ada b.

  Lubang tanah galian c. Tong sampah 7.

  Cara pengolahan sampah a.

  Tidak diolah dan dibiarkan berserakan b.

  Dibakar c. Diangkut petugas kebersihan

  polamakan1 * imt Crosstabulation

  imt Gemuk Kurus Normal Total polamakan1 a Count

  6 19 112 137 % of Total 3.9% 12.4% 73.2% 89.5% b Count

  1

  2

  13

  16 % of Total .7% 1.3% 8.5% 10.5%

  Total Count

  7 21 125 153 % of Total 4.6% 13.7% 81.7% 100.0%

  polamakan2 * imt Crosstabulation

  imt Gemuk Kurus Normal Total polamakan2 a Count

  7 20 112 139 % of Total 4.6% 13.1% 73.2% 90.8% b Count

  1

  13

  14 % of Total .0% .7% 8.5% 9.2%

  Total Count

  7 21 125 153 % of Total 4.6% 13.7% 81.7% 100.0%

  polamakan3 * imt Crosstabulation

  imt Gemuk Kurus Normal Total polamakan3 a Count

  7 21 125 153 % of Total 4.6% 13.7% 81.7% 100.0%

  Total Count

  7 21 125 153 % of Total 4.6% 13.7% 81.7% 100.0%

  polamakan4 * imt Crosstabulation

  imt Gemuk Kurus Normal Total polamakan4 a Count

  5

  11 92 108 % of Total 3.3% 7.2% 60.1% 70.6% b Count

  2

  10

  33

  45 % of Total 1.3% 6.5% 21.6% 29.4%

  Total Count

  7 21 125 153 % of Total 4.6% 13.7% 81.7% 100.0%

  lingkungan1 * imt Crosstabulation

  imt Gemuk Kurus Normal Total lingkungan1 a Count

  5

  5 % of Total .0% .0% 3.3% 3.3% b Count

  2

  13

  55

  70 % of Total 1.3% 8.5% 35.9% 45.8% c Count

  5

  8

  65

  78 % of Total 3.3% 5.2% 42.5% 51.0%

  Total Count

  7 21 125 153 % of Total 4.6% 13.7% 81.7% 100.0%

  lingkungan2 * imt Crosstabulation

  imt Gemuk Kurus Normal Total lingkungan2 a Count

  1

  4

  31

  36 % of Total .7% 2.6% 20.3% 23.5% b Count

  3

  1

  26

  30 % of Total 2.0% .7% 17.0% 19.6% c Count

  3

  16

  68

  87 % of Total 2.0% 10.5% 44.4% 56.9%

  Total Count

  7 21 125 153 % of Total 4.6% 13.7% 81.7% 100.0%

  lingkungan3 * imt Crosstabulation

  imt Gemuk Kurus Normal Total lingkungan3 b Count

  3

  3 % of Total .0% .0% 2.0% 2.0% c Count

  7 21 122 150 % of Total 4.6% 13.7% 79.7% 98.0%

  Total Count

  7 21 125 153 % of Total 4.6% 13.7% 81.7% 100.0%

  lingkungan4 * imt Crosstabulation

  imt Gemuk Kurus Normal Total lingkungan4 a Count

  9

  9 % of Total .0% .0% 5.9% 5.9% c Count

  7 21 116 144 % of Total 4.6% 13.7% 75.8% 94.1%

  Total Count

  7 21 125 153 % of Total 4.6% 13.7% 81.7% 100.0%

  lingkungan5 * imt Crosstabulation

  imt Gemuk Kurus Normal Total lingkungan5 b Count

  1

  15

  16 % of Total .0% .7% 9.8% 10.5% c Count

  7 20 110 137 % of Total 4.6% 13.1% 71.9% 89.5%

  Total Count

  7 21 125 153 % of Total 4.6% 13.7% 81.7% 100.0%

  lingkungan6 * imt Crosstabulation

  imt Gemuk Kurus Normal Total lingkungan6 a Count

  2

  9

  11 % of Total .0% 1.3% 5.9% 7.2% b Count

  3

  2

  7

  12 % of Total 2.0% 1.3% 4.6% 7.8% c Count

  4 17 109 130 % of Total 2.6% 11.1% 71.2% 85.0%

  Total Count

  7 21 125 153 % of Total 4.6% 13.7% 81.7% 100.0%

  lingkungan7 * imt Crosstabulation

  imt Gemuk Kurus Normal Total lingkungan7 a Count

  2

  2 % of Total .0% 1.3% .0% 1.3% b Count

  5

  9

  41

  55 % of Total 3.3% 5.9% 26.8% 35.9% c Count

  2

  10

  84

  96 % of Total 1.3% 6.5% 54.9% 62.7%

  Total Count

  7 21 125 153 % of Total 4.6% 13.7% 81.7% 100.0%

  pendidikan

  Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid d3

  8

  5.2

  5.2

  5.2 s1

  18

  11.8

  11.8

  17.0 sd

  2

  1.3

  1.3

  18.3 slta

  95

  62.1

  62.1

  80.4 sltp

  29

  19.0

  19.0

  99.3 tidak se 1 .7 .7 100.0

  Total 153 100.0 100.0

  penyakit

  Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid a

  2

  1.3

  1.3

  1.3 b 1 .7 .7

  2.0 c 1 .7 .7

  2.6 d 149 97.4 97.4 100.0

  Total 153 100.0 100.0

  Pekerjaan

  Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent

  Valid buruh tetap

  25

  16.3

  16.3

  16.3 buruh lepas

  34

  22.2

  22.2

  38.6 ibu rumah tangga

  94

  61.4 61.4 100.0 Total 153 100.0 100.0

  imt

  Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid Gemuk

  7

  4.6

  4.6

  4.6 Kurus

  21

  13.7

  13.7

  18.3 Normal 125

  81.7 81.7 100.0 Total 153 100.0 100.0

  imt * pendidikan Crosstabulation

  pendidikan d3 s1 sd slta sltp tidak se Total imt Gemuk Count

  1

  4

  2

  7 % within imt 14.3% .0% .0% 57.1% 28.6% .0% 100.0% % within pendidikan 12.5% .0% .0% 4.2% 6.9% .0% 4.6% % of Total .7% .0% .0% 2.6% 1.3% .0% 4.6%

  Kurus Count

  1

  1

  12

  7

  21 % within imt .0% 4.8% 4.8% 57.1% 33.3% .0% 100.0% % within pendidikan .0% 5.6% 50.0% 12.6% 24.1% .0% 13.7% % of Total .0% .7% .7% 7.8% 4.6% .0% 13.7%

  Normal Count

  7

  17

  1

  79

  20 1 125 % within imt 5.6% 13.6% .8% 63.2% 16.0% .8% 100.0% % within pendidikan 87.5% 94.4% 50.0% 83.2% 69.0% 100.0% 81.7% % of Total 4.6% 11.1% .7% 51.6% 13.1% .7% 81.7%

  Total Count

  8

  18

  2

  95

  29 1 153 % within imt 5.2% 11.8% 1.3% 62.1% 19.0% .7% 100.0% % within pendidikan 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 5.2% 11.8% 1.3% 62.1% 19.0% .7% 100.0%

  Chi-Square Tests

  Asymp. Sig. (2- Value df sided)

  a

  Pearson Chi-Square 10.108 10 .431 Likelihood Ratio 11.004 10 .357 N of Valid Cases 153

  a. 13 cells (72.2%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .05.

  imt * Pekerjaan Crosstabulation

  Pekerjaan buruh tetap buruh lepas ibu rumah tangga Total imt Gemuk Count

  3

  4

  7 % within imt .0% 42.9% 57.1% 100.0% % within Pekerjaan .0% 8.8% 4.3% 4.6% % of Total .0% 2.0% 2.6% 4.6%

  Kurus Count

  2

  6

  13

  21 % within imt 9.5% 28.6% 61.9% 100.0% % within Pekerjaan 8.0% 17.6% 13.8% 13.7% % of Total 1.3% 3.9% 8.5% 13.7%

  Normal Count

  23

  25 77 125 % within imt 18.4% 20.0% 61.6% 100.0% % within Pekerjaan 92.0% 73.5% 81.9% 81.7% % of Total 15.0% 16.3% 50.3% 81.7%

  Total Count

  25

  34 94 153 % within imt 16.3% 22.2% 61.4% 100.0% % within Pekerjaan 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 16.3% 22.2% 61.4% 100.0%

  Chi-Square Tests

  Asymp. Sig. (2- Value df sided)

  a

  Pearson Chi-Square 4.088 4 .394 Likelihood Ratio 5.014 4 .286 N of Valid Cases 153

  a. 5 cells (55.6%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1.14.

  imt * jumlahanak Crosstabulation

  jumlahanak

  1

  2

  3

  4

  5

  7 Total imt Gemuk Count

  2

  2

  2

  1

  7 % within imt .0% 28.6% 28.6% 28.6% 14.3% .0% 100.0% % within jumlahanak .0% 4.8% 4.5% 4.2% 9.1% .0% 4.6% % of Total .0% 1.3% 1.3% 1.3% .7% .0% 4.6%

  Kurus Count

  1

  5

  6

  5

  4

  21 % within imt 4.8% 23.8% 28.6% 23.8% 19.0% .0% 100.0% % within jumlahanak 16.7% 11.9% 13.6% 10.4% 36.4% .0% 13.7% % of Total .7% 3.3% 3.9% 3.3% 2.6% .0% 13.7%

  Normal Count

  5

  35

  36

  41

  6 2 125 % within imt 4.0% 28.0% 28.8% 32.8% 4.8% 1.6% 100.0% % within jumlahanak 83.3% 83.3% 81.8% 85.4% 54.5% 100.0% 81.7% % of Total 3.3% 22.9% 23.5% 26.8% 3.9% 1.3% 81.7%

  Total Count

  6

  42

  44

  48

  11 2 153 % within imt 3.9% 27.5% 28.8% 31.4% 7.2% 1.3% 100.0% % within jumlahanak 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 3.9% 27.5% 28.8% 31.4% 7.2% 1.3% 100.0%

  Chi-Square Tests

  Asymp. Sig. (2- Value df sided)

  a

  Pearson Chi-Square 6.953 10 .730 Likelihood Ratio 6.354 10 .785 N of Valid Cases 153

  a. 11 cells (61.1%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .09.

  imt * polamakan1 Crosstabulation

  polamakan1 a b Total imt Gemuk Count

  6

  1

  7 % within imt 85.7% 14.3% 100.0% % within polamakan1 4.4% 6.3% 4.6% % of Total 3.9% .7% 4.6%

  Kurus Count

  19

  2

  21 % within imt 90.5% 9.5% 100.0% % within polamakan1 13.9% 12.5% 13.7% % of Total 12.4% 1.3% 13.7%

  Normal Count 112 13 125 % within imt 89.6% 10.4% 100.0% % within polamakan1 81.8% 81.3% 81.7% % of Total 73.2% 8.5% 81.7%

  Total Count 137 16 153 % within imt 89.5% 10.5% 100.0% % within polamakan1 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 89.5% 10.5% 100.0%

  Chi-Square Tests

  Asymp. Sig. (2- Value df sided)

  a

  Pearson Chi-Square .130 2 .937 Likelihood Ratio .120 2 .942 N of Valid Cases 153

  a. 2 cells (33.3%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .73.