Manajemen | Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Maritim Raja Ali Haji joeb.83.5.295-301
Journal of Education for Business
ISSN: 0883-2323 (Print) 1940-3356 (Online) Journal homepage: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/vjeb20
The Integrated Business Curriculum: An
Examination of Perceptions and Practices
Manoj Athavale , Rod Davis & Mark Myring
To cite this article: Manoj Athavale , Rod Davis & Mark Myring (2008) The Integrated Business
Curriculum: An Examination of Perceptions and Practices, Journal of Education for Business,
83:5, 295-301, DOI: 10.3200/JOEB.83.5.295-301
To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.3200/JOEB.83.5.295-301
Published online: 07 Aug 2010.
Submit your article to this journal
Article views: 93
View related articles
Citing articles: 10 View citing articles
Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at
http://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=vjeb20
Download by: [Universitas Maritim Raja Ali Haji]
Date: 11 January 2016, At: 23:13
TheIntegratedBusinessCurriculum:An
ExaminationofPerceptionsandPractices
MANOJATHAVALE
RODDAVIS
Downloaded by [Universitas Maritim Raja Ali Haji] at 23:13 11 January 2016
MARKMYRING
BALLSTATEUNIVERSITY
MUNCIE,INDIANA
ABSTRACT. Constituentsoftencriticize
businessschoolsforfailingtoprovidestudentswithacomprehensiveunderstanding
ofhowbusinessorganizationsfunction.
Businessschoolshaverespondedtothe
mandatewithattemptstointegrate
discipline-specificfunctionalknowledge
intoacoherentunderstandingoftheevolvingbusinessorganization.Successful
integrationoftheundergraduatebusiness
curriculumwillresultinstudentswho
aremoredirectlyinvolvedinthelearning
processandwillincreasecurricularrelevancebytranslatingfunctionalknowledge
intobusinessskills.However,curriculum
integrationisanextensiveandpotentially
disruptivecurricularchangethatmay
involvecostandisfraughtwithpitfalls.
Theauthorssurveyeddeansatmember
schoolsoftheAssociationtoAdvanceCollegiateSchoolsofBusinessInternationalto
assesstheextenttowhichandthemanner
inwhichintegrationhastakenplacewithin
thebusinesscurriculum.
Keywords:assessment,businessschools,
corecurriculum,integration
Copyright©2008HeldrefPublications
I
n this study, we surveyed deans at
schools that were members of the
Association to Advance Collegiate
Schools of Business International
(AACSB) to assess their perceptions
ofanintegratedcurriculumandalsoto
assesstheprogressmadeindeveloping
suchanintegratedbusinesscurriculum.
An integrated curriculum is designed
to emphasize the interrelationships
betweenfunctionalareasofabusiness,
thereby providing students with an
understanding of how businesses operate.Previousresearchhasprovidedthe
rational for and the methods used in
curriculumintegration,butnostudyhas
provided a comprehensive overview of
the current state of integrated curriculuminbusinessschools.Wetriedtofill
thisvoidintheresearch.
Anintegratedcurriculumisaninnovative method of business education
with a broad-based, multidisciplinary,
organization-centric approach. This
technique departs significantly from
traditional function-centric business
education. An integrated business curriculumoffersmanybenefits.However,
the development and successful implementationofthiseducationalchangeis
difficult.DeConinckandSteiner(1999)
suggestedthatanintegratedcurriculum
provides students with a better understanding of the dependencies between
thefunctionalareasofthefirm,emphasizes effective communication and the
abilitytoworkincross-functionalteams,
and fosters a better understanding of
organizational purpose, resources, and
functioning. In addition to the traditional focus on acquiring knowledge,
the integrated curriculum emphasizes
developing skills that are relevant to a
successfulcareer.
The extent of potential benefits and
the transformational nature of an integrated curriculum have resulted in
much attention in the scholarly literature. According to Hamilton, McFarland, and Mirchandani (2000), more
than 60 publications have reported on
20 different methods to integrate the
business curriculum at 35 universities.
Much of the existing literature focuses
on descriptions of the external forces
that create the demand for integration
(e.g.,Porter&McKibbin,1988;Stover,
Morris, Pharr, Reyes, & Byers, 1997)
or examines techniques used in curriculumintegration(e.g.,Brunel&Hibbard, 2006; DeMoranville, Aurand, &
Gordon, 2000; Kwok, 1994;Young &
Murphy, 2003). Although this literaturehasmadeasignificantcontribution
to the field, it fails to provide direct
evidence of the perception of business
schooldeansoftheforcesthatmotivate
integration.Inaddition,priorstudiesdo
not examine the frequency with which
proposed methods of integration are
used.Last,fewdataexistregardingthe
techniques used to assess the success
May/June2008
295
of curriculum integration.These issues
provide the motivation for the present
study.
Wesurveyedbusinessschooldeansto
examinetheperceivedneedtointegrate
thecurriculumandthefactorsmotivating
this need. We also examined the methods used in curriculum integration, the
resourcesallocated,thecurrentstatusof
theintegrationproject,andthemethods
ofassessingthesuccessonintegration.
Downloaded by [Universitas Maritim Raja Ali Haji] at 23:13 11 January 2016
DemandforandCost
ofCurriculumIntegration
Faculty, students, and the business
community exert significant pressure
and demands on the content and form
of business school curricula (Heinfeldt
&Wolf,1998;Ramaswamy,1992).The
businesscommunityprefersemployees
whoareteamplayers,understandorganizational interactions, and make decisions that benefit the entire company.
Ifcurriculumintegrationdevelopsthese
skills, employers will support initiatives in this area. Current and potential students may demand curriculum
integration(Smith-Ducoffe,Tromley,&
Tucker,2006)undertheperceptionthat
an integrated curriculum will provide
enhanced educational experiences and
betteremploymentopportunities.
Integrated curriculum development
haslargelybeentheresultofperceived
demand from the business community
for employees with multidisciplinary
skills. DeMoranville et al. (2000) stated that business organizations have
begun to focus on the development of
cross-functional teams.Although organizations value employees with cross-
functionalskills,evidencesuggeststhat
functionally aligned organizations find
it difficult to make the transition to
cross-functional teams (Bishop, 1999),
largelybecauseemployeeslackacrossfunctional perspective (Gerwin, 1999)
and associate with functional departments more than they associate with
organizationalgoals(Hennessey,1999).
Thiscreatesademandfromthebusiness
communityforstudentswhounderstand
how businesses operate and who can
performincross-functionalteams.
Students will likely attend business
schools that they believe will provide
the highest quality education and the
296
JournalofEducationforBusiness
bestemploymentopportunitiesongraduation. Employers value students who
have an understanding of how business organizations function. An integrated curriculum builds this skill set,
and hence potential employers may
recruit heavily at schools with such a
curriculum. Because of the benefits
that likely accrue to students (higher-
quality education and better employment opportunities) and the university
(prestige, enrollment, and budgets),
business school faculty have a strong
motivationtoattaintheobjectivesofan
integrated curriculum. Faculty involvement is important to this initiative
becauseitisthebusinessschoolfaculty
whowilldesign,implement,andassess
thesuccessoftheinitiative.
Although the AACSB tries to avoid
prescribingacookie-cutterbusinesscurriculum, the organization does list the
integratedcurriculumconceptasaninteresting new curricular development that
business schools need to look at, adapt,
orimproveon(Ryan,1999).Inaddition,
the AACSB standards recommend an
integrated core business curriculum and
analysisoforganizationalissuesusinga
cross-functionalmethodology.
The AACSB has played a key role
in influencing the business curriculum
by participating in influential studies
on standards and practices, which has
enabled universities to provide worldclassmanagementeducation.Porterand
McKibbin(1988)specificallyraisedthe
issueofcurriculumintegration.Thisproactiveprojectappraisedthethen-current
state of management education, consideredthelikelyfutureifnomajorchanges
were made, and developed a set of recommendationsforthedirectioninwhich
the profession should be moving. An
important conclusion from this project
wasthattherewasinsufficientemphasis
onintegrationacrossthefunctionalareas.
Theneedforcurriculumintegrationwas
reinforced in 2002 with the publication of Management Education at Risk:
Report of the Management Education
Task Force to the AACSB International
Board of Directors. In a section titled
“Blurring Disciplinary Boundaries,” the
AACSB(2002)statedthat
Aprimeexampleofconcernsaboutcurrencyandrelevanceofbusinesscurricula
relatestothefunctionalsilosthatprovide
theorganizationalframeworkfordepartments, core curricula, and even elective
courses in typical business degree programs. Yet actual business problems or
solutions rarely present themselves in
neatlyorganized,verticalsilos.(p.20)
The successful implementation of an
integratedcurriculumrequiresinvestment
of significant resources and substantial
effort on the part of the faculty. Failure
to garner these resources may account
fortherelativelylowlevelofintegration
in business schools today. Specifically,
inasurveyofAACSB-accreditedundergraduatebusinessschools,DeMoranville
et al. (2000) found that although most
(90%)hadaseniorcapstonecoursethat
integrated business functions, very few
(lessthan5%)hadacomprehensiveprogram that formally addressed the need
for cross-functional integration of businessprinciples.
Thesignificantcostsassociatedwith
thedeliveryofanintegratedcurriculum
may also play a role in its slow adoption. Kwok (1994) recognized the pitfalls associated with integration when
hesuggestedthatalthoughanintegrated
approach seems preferable, in reality
the extent and manner of integration
leavesmuchtobedesired.Pharr(2000,
2003)hasnotedthatthecauseofmany
oftheproblemscitedinintegratingthe
curriculum may be found in the attitudinal, infrastructure, and resource support allocated to the implementation
of an integrated curriculum. Another
hurdle to the development of an integrated curriculum is the need to align
facultyperceptionsoftheimportanceof
functional competence to the needs of
the integrated business-process-driven
curriculum.Thefailuretoalignperceptionsmayresultincurriculummodificationsthatveertowardabrokeredcompromise between functional disciplines
rather than a ground-up review of the
completebusinesscurriculum.
CommonMethodsofCurriculum
Integration
Untilrecently,manycollegesofbusiness relied entirely on a single course,
oftenaseniorcapstone,toprovidestudents with an integrated experience.
Becauseoftheperceiveddemandsexertedonthembythebusinesscommunity,
students,faculty,andAACSB,business
Downloaded by [Universitas Maritim Raja Ali Haji] at 23:13 11 January 2016
schoolshaveenhancedtheircoverageof
integrative topics and have considered
newtechniquesforachievingtheobjectives of an integrated curriculum. We
reviewsomecommonmethods.
The use of a comprehensive case
over the entire business curriculum is
acommonlyadoptedmethodologythat
delivers a consistent message on the
integrated nature of the business organization. Besides the desired objective
of introducing the students to the integrated nature of businesses, the case
approach can be used to provide students with semantic knowledge skills,
higher-ordercriticalthinkingskills,and
areal-worldorientation.Environmental
changes can also be incorporated in
cases on a periodic basis without the
need to make extensive modifications
tothecaseandwithoutlossofcontinuity.Markulis,Howe,andStrang(2005)
presented the rationale, methodology,
andprocessofdevelopingsuchacasebasedmodelforcurriculumintegration
andoutlinedplanstointegratethecase
intoupper-levelbusinesscourses.
Another model for delivery of an
integrated undergraduate curriculum
followstheentrepreneurialpathofnew
product development. Brunel and Hibbard (2006) described such a process,
wherein 4 traditional courses (marketing, operations, information systems,
and finance) are integrated into a 16credit, semester-long sequence. This
process culminates in a project in
which students develop a comprehensive business plan for a new consumer
product idea. Walker and Ainsworth
(2001) illustrated a similar businessprocessapproachtodeliveringthecore
undergraduate curriculum, consistent
withthetrendtowardprocess-managed
organizations. Their study also investigatedhowaccountingeducationcanbe
incorporatedintothismodelandhowa
process-centered curriculum may give
accountingstudentsabroaderandmore
integratededucationalexperience.
Somebusinessschoolshaveproposed
the use of course modules to integrate
the business curriculum. For example,
Miller (2000) reported on an attempt
to improve business and economics
instruction by integrating economics
and other undergraduate business disciplines that were previously taught in
stand-alone courses, into a 6-module
sequence over 2 semesters, and providedaqualitativebenefit–costanalysis
oftheintegrationeffort.
Awidevarietyofmethodshavebeen
used to integrate curriculum.Although
this research provides an interesting
descriptionofsomeofthenewermethods used in curricular integration, it
does not provide quantitative information about the commonly used techniques. Such information is of interest
to business schools whose administratorsaretryingtochooseamongalternativeintegrationmethods.Inthepresent
article, we fill this void by presenting
directevidenceonthisissue.
METHOD
Wedesignedthesurveythatweused
inthisstudytoprovidedataonthecurrent state of curriculum integration in
AACSBmemberschools.Itwasintended to capture information related to
attemptsatintegratingthecurriculum—
factors driving the change toward an
integrated curriculum, the techniques
used by business schools to meet the
goals of integration, and the methods
usedtoassessthesuccessofintegration
efforts. The survey comprises 29 questions:9demographicquestionsaboutthe
deans and their institution, 3 questions
abouttherespondent’sperceptionofthe
significanceofcurriculumintegration,4
questionsaboutthecurrentstatusofcurriculum integration at the respondent’s
school,7questionsaboutresourcesused
in the process, 2 questions about curriculumintegrationmethods,and4questionsabouttheassessmentofcurriculum
integrationefforts.
The AACSB provided us e-mail
addresses, which enabled us to communicate with business school deans.
Deansareoftensurveyedfortheirperceptionsonmattersofimportancetothe
academic community (e.g., Hazeldine
& Miles, 2007; Martell, 2007; Pringle
& Michel, 2007). However, to the best
ofourknowledge,ourswasthefirstsurvey to assess the extent and manner to
whichintegrationhastakenplacewithin
the business curriculum. In November
2005,wesenttobusinessschooldeans
TABLE1.BusinessSchoolDeans’PerceptionofNeedtoIntegratethe
BusinessCurriculum
Towhatdegreedoyouperceivetheneedtointegratetheundergraduatecorecurriculum?
Degree
Strongneed
Mildneed
Neutral
Verylittleneed
Noneed
Total
Frequency
69
47
20
6
1
143
%
48.2
32.9
14.0
4.2
0.7
100.0
Ifyouperceivethereisaneedtointegratetheundergraduatecorecurriculum,what
factorsmotivatedyourperception?
Factor
Criticaltofuturesuccessofstudents
Partofaccreditationrequirements
Encouragementorpressurefromrecruitersoremployers
Initiatedbyfaculty
Encouragementorpressurefromadvisoryboard
Pressurefromcurrentstudents
Thereisnoperceivedneedforintegration
Other
Total
Frequency
110
38
26
29
24
7
7
13
254
%
76.9
26.6
18.2
20.3
16.8
4.9
4.9
9.1
177.6
Note.Multipleresponseswereallowed.
May/June2008
297
a short e-mail explaining the purpose
oftheprojectandsolicitingtheircooperation in completing the project. The
e-mail directed participants to a Webbased survey to answer a brief questionnaire regarding their perceptions
about the integration process and their
school’s practices relating to curricular
integration.Afollow-upletterwassent
in December 2005. Of 630 deans, 143
chose to participate in the project, a
responserateofapproximately23%.
Downloaded by [Universitas Maritim Raja Ali Haji] at 23:13 11 January 2016
RESULTS
Wegroupedtheresultsofthissurvey
into five issues related to curriculum
integration:thesignificanceofcurriculum integration, the current status of
the integration process, methods used
to integrate the curriculum, resources necessary for integration, and an
assessment of integration efforts. We
first examined the perceived need to
integratethebusinesscurriculum,with
emphasisplacedontheunderlyingfactorsthatmotivatetheneedtointegrate.
Participantswereaskedtheirperception
oftheneedtointegratethecurriculum.
Results of this analysis are presented
in Table 1. Of the 143 respondents,
116(81.1%)reportedastrongneedor
a mild need to integrate the business
curriculum across disciplines. Based
ontheseresults,itisclearthatrespondentsbelieveintheimportanceofcurriculum integration across disciplines.
This result is not surprising given the
demandsplacedonbusinessschoolsto
integratethecurriculum.
Next, we examined the factors that
motivatedtheneedtointegratethecurriculum. Respondents were provided
withalistoffactorsandwereaskedto
select those that might have influenced
their perception of the need to integrate across disciplines. The results of
this analysis are presented in Table 1.
Respondents indicated that the most
important factor motivating curriculum
integrationwasthatitwascriticaltothe
futuresuccessofstudents(76.9%).Other
motivatingfactorscitedwereaccreditationrequirements(26.6%),partofafaculty initiative (20.3%), encouragement
orpressurefromrecruitersandemployers(18.2%),andencouragementorpressurefromadvisoryboards(16.8%).
298
JournalofEducationforBusiness
TABLE2.ParticipantResponsestotheQuestion,“Whichstatementbest
describesthecurrentstatusofundergraduatecurriculumintegration
effortsinyouracademicunit?”
Response
Wehaveexaminedtheconceptofintegrationandare
intheprocessofdevelopinganintegrationplan.
Wehavenotexaminedtheconceptofintegration.
Wehaveimplementedaplantointegratethe
undergraduatecorecurriculum.
Wehaveexaminedtheconceptofintegrationand
havedecidednottopursueit.
Westartedtheplanningprocessbutdiscontinued
effortsbeforeimplementation.
Total
Frequency
%
52
40
37.1
28.6
32
22.9
14
10.0
2
140
1.4
100.0
Note.Multipleresponseswereallowed.
TABLE3.MethodsofBusinessCurriculumIntegration
Whereshouldintegrationeffortsbemade?
Response
Corecurriculum
Businesspolicyandstrategycourse
Capstonecasecourse
Introductorybusinesscourse
Acrosstheentirecurriculum,including
coursesinthemajor
Other
Total
Frequency
%
105
92
88
69
73.4
64.3
61.5
48.3
39
8
401
27.3
5.6
280.4
Whatmethodshaveyouusedordoyouplantousetoprovideanintegratedcurriculum?
Method
Businesspolicyandstrategycourse
Useofcurrenttopics(e.g.,BusinessWeek,WallStreet
Journal)todiscusscross-disciplineimplications
Guestspeakers
Criticalthinkingandinterpersonalskills
Teamteaching
Acommonandconsistentmessage(e.g.,teamwork,
communicationskills,ethics)acrossthecurriculum
Useofcaseswithineachcourse
Communityservice,mentoring,andinternships
Multi-disciplinarystudentteams
Participationinlive,multi-disciplinaryprojectswith
localbusinesses
Useofacommoncaseacrosscorecourses
Developmentofnontraditionalmulti-disciplinarycourses
Individualfacultymembersteachingdiversedisciplines
Schedulecorecoursesasablockratherthan
assinglecourses
Refocuscurrentcurriculumonbusinessprocesses
Useofinformationsystemscomponentacross
corecourses
Lock-stepcurriculum
Other
Total
Note.Multipleresponseswereallowed.
Frequency
%
85
59.4
73
72
69
63
51.0
50.3
48.3
44.0
63
59
58
49
44.0
41.2
40.5
34.3
48
44
38
35
33.6
30.8
26.6
24.5
32
29
22.4
20.3
26
10
9
862
18.2
7.0
6.3
602.8
Downloaded by [Universitas Maritim Raja Ali Haji] at 23:13 11 January 2016
It is encouraging that respondents
concurred with the AACSB that curriculumintegrationisimportanttoprovidinghigh-qualityeducation.Itisalso
importanttonotethatrespondentsperceivedthattheiradvisoryboards,which
generally comprise professionals from
outside the colleges of business, favor
integrationofthecurriculum.
We next examined the current status of integration efforts at business
schools.Becauseoftheperceptionthat
integrationisanimportantfactorinthe
success of business school graduates,
itisrationaltoexpectsignificantprogresstowardcurriculumintegration.The
current status of integration efforts are
presentedinTable2.Surprisingly,40%
ofschoolseitherhadnotexaminedthe
conceptofcurriculumintegrationorhad
examined the concept and decided not
to pursue it. Only 22.9% of schools
had implemented a plan to integrate
the undergraduate core curriculum,
although 37.1% of schools were in the
processofdevelopingaplanforcurricularintegration.Thislackofintegration
maybeduetothehighcostsassociated
withcurriculumintegration.
Therearemanyplacesinthebusiness
curriculum where integration could take
place.Weprovidedparticipantswithalist
of logical places for curriculum integration and asked them to choose where,
in their perception, the integration effort
shouldbemade.TheresultsofthisanalysisarepresentedinTable3.Mostrespondents believed that the appropriate place
forcurriculumintegrationwasinthecore
curriculum (73.4%). A business policy
and strategy course (64.3%), a capstone
casecourse(61.5%),andanintroductory
businesscourse(48.3%)werealsofavored
places in which to integrate the curriculum.Thisfindingsuggeststhatintegration
couldcommonlyoccuratmultiplestages
inthebusinesscurriculum.
An important consideration for the
many institutions whose administrators
areplanningcurriculumintegrationisthe
method used to achieve curricular integration. Table 3 presents methods that
business school administrators planned
to use or had used to provide an integrated curriculum. The most common
methodforfacilitatingcurricularintegration was the use of the business policy
andstrategycourse(59.4%),followedby
TABLE4.ResourcesforBusinessCurriculumIntegration
Ifyouarepursuingorhaveimplementedcurricularintegration,whatresources
facilitatedintegrationefforts?
Resource
Interestorcommitmentfromfaculty
InformationorattendanceatAACSBconferences
Financialincentivestofacultytoconduct
curriculumdevelopment
Teachingloadreductions
Fundingforrelatedfacultyresearch
Other
Wearenotpursuinganintegratedcurriculum
Total
Frequency
%
61
34
42.7
23.8
20
16
13
8
21
173
14.0
11.2
9.1
5.6
14.7
121.0
Towhatextentdoyouagreethat,inthefuture,newfacultyhireswillneedtobemore
cross-disciplined?
Response
Stronglyagree
Mildlyagree
Neutral
Mildlydisagree
Stronglydisagree
Total
Frequency
43
53
23
15
5
139
%
30.9
38.1
16.5
10.8
3.6
100.0
Note.Multipleresponseswerenotallowed.AACSB=AssociationtoAdvanceCollegiate
SchoolsofBusinessInternational.
discussions of cross-disciplinary implications arising from current topic readings from popular business periodicals
(51.0%)andinvitationofguestspeakers
forinteractionwithbusinesspractitioners
relating integrated business practices in
their business (50.3%). Many schools
achievedcurricularintegrationbydeveloping new courses or improving the
method of delivery. Courses that developed critical thinking and interpersonal
skills (48.3%), encouraged team teaching (44.0%), and ensured a consistent
message—forexample,teamwork,communicationskills,andethics—acrossthe
curriculum(44.0%)werealsothefocus
of integration efforts. Other commonly
adoptedpracticesincludedtheextensive
useofcaseswithincoursesandbusiness
interactionsthroughcommunityservice,
mentoring,andinternships.
Business schools adopted multiple
methods to ensure curricular integration, with the average business school
adopting six methods from those listed
in Table 3. Further, the methods listed
are not exclusive. Thus, the business
policyandstrategycoursecouldinclude
theuseofcasesandguestspeakersand
could involve multidisciplinary teams
thatparticipateinliveprojectswithlocal
businesses. Another theme that arises
from the data that we present is that
most schools perceived that the objectives of curricular integration could be
achieved through interaction with practitioners from outside academia. Note
theuseofguestspeakers(50.3%);community service, mentoring, and internships(40.5%);andparticipationinlive,
multidisciplinary projects with local
businesses(33.6%).Last,mostbusiness
schoolsreliedonthebusinesspolicyand
strategycourse(59.4%)toachievesome
measure of curricular integration, and
thatrelianceshouldmotivatetheneedfor
reviewing course content, hiring crossdiscipline trained faculty, engaging in
teamteachingtosupplementskills,and
focusing on this course for assessment
of student learning as part of the curriculummanagementprocess.
Theimportanceofbusinesscorecurriculumintegrationtothefuturesuccess
May/June2008
299
TABLE5.AssessmentofBusinessCurriculumIntegration
Towhatextentdoyouagreethatcurriculumintegrationcanbeeffectivelyassessed?
Response
Frequency
Stronglyagree
Mildlyagree
Neutral
Mildlydisagree
Stronglydisagree
Total
34
70
27
9
0
140
%
24.3
50.0
19.3
6.4
0.0
100.0
Whatdirectmeasuresareusedtoassesscurriculumintegration?
Downloaded by [Universitas Maritim Raja Ali Haji] at 23:13 11 January 2016
Response
Frequency
Performanceinanintegrativecapstonecourse
Caseanalysis
Businessplan
Graduationorexitexam
Traditionalexams
Businesssimulation
Pretestandposttest
Idon’tknow
Other
Total
64
52
37
34
34
29
25
21
16
312
%
44.7
36.4
25.9
23.8
23.8
20.3
17.5
14.7
11.2
218.2
Whatindirectmeasuresareusedtoassesscurriculumintegration?
Response
Frequency
Seniorexitsurvey
Alumnisurvey
Facultydiscussion
Employersurvey
Advisoryboarddiscussion
Studentfocusgroups
Comparisonwithtargetedlevelsoflearning
Facultylevelaccountabilitythroughannualreview
Bloom’staxonomy
Placementrecord
Recruitmentofcross-disciplinarytrainedfaculty
Idon’tknow
Other
Total
69
55
54
45
41
41
33
25
23
19
18
17
11
451
%
48.2
38.5
37.8
31.5
28.7
28.7
23.1
17.5
16.1
13.3
12.5
11.9
7.7
315.4
Note.Multipleresponseswereallowed.
of students and the diverse methods
used to integrate curriculum necessitateanassessmentoftheresourcesthat
businessschoolshavecommittedtothe
process.Analysis of the resources that
such schools have provided to support
curricular integration is presented in
Table4.Itisnotsurprisingthatthemain
factorthatfacilitatedcurricularintegration was faculty commitment (42.7%).
A relatively small number of universities (23.8%) had funded attendance at
300
JournalofEducationforBusiness
AACSB conferences, and even fewer
provided financial incentives (14.0%)
or teaching load reductions (11.2%) to
faculty pursuing integration initiatives.
Thefactthatcurriculumintegrationhas
notbeenmoreaggressivelyencouraged
and supported with adequate resources
isindeedsurprising.
A large proportion of respondents
(69.0%) believed that future faculty-
hiringpracticeswouldneedtoconsider
thecross-disciplinarycapabilitiesofnew
hires.Thisfindingshowedasignificant
commitment to curriculum integration.
Such changes in hiring practices may
have implications for the recruitment
and training of candidates at doctoral
institutions.
Last,wealsoexaminedrespondents’
perceptionsoftheirabilitytoassessthe
extenttowhichthecurriculumhadbeen
integrated and the methods commonly
adoptedtoconductsuchanassessment.
TheseresultsarepresentedinTable5.
TheinformationpresentedinTable5
shows that most respondents (74.3%)
believed that curriculum integration
couldbeaffectivelyassessed.Examining
this issue in greater detail, we identifiedbothdirectandindirectmeasuresof
assessment.Oursurveyresultsindicated
that performance in an integrative capstone course (44.7%) and case analysis
(36.4%) were the most common direct
techniquesusedinassessmentofcurriculumintegration,andaseniorexitsurvey
(48.2%),analumnisurvey(38.5%),and
a faculty discussion (37.8%) were the
most common indirect techniques used
inassessmentofcurriculumintegration.
Institutionsdidnotrelyononlyasingle
measure of assessment but on average
used2.18directand3.15indirectassessmenttechniques.
DISCUSSION
In this article, we examined the currentstatusofeffortstomakethebusiness
curriculum more relevant to the future
successofbusinessstudentsbyimprovingcorebusinessknowledgeandproviding a better understanding of the integrativenatureofbusinessorganizations.
Althoughpriorresearchhasoutlinedthe
needtointegratethecurriculumandhas
describedeffortsmadeinthisdirection,
we believe that the present study providesacomprehensiveassessmentofthe
currentstateofcurricularintegration.
Our results indicate that business
schools have responded to the demands
of various constituents and perceive curricular integration as an important issue.
However,curricularintegrationisacostly and time-consuming process fraught
withpitfalls.Manybusinessschoolshave
made little significant progress toward
design, implementation, and assessment.
Our analysis of the present results also
Downloaded by [Universitas Maritim Raja Ali Haji] at 23:13 11 January 2016
indicate that methods of integration and
thepointatwhichintegrationisintroduced
varysignificantlyacrossbusinessschools.
Despite the perceived need for curricular integration, relatively few resources
havebeencommittedtothisactivity.Last,
respondentsfeltthatcurricularintegration
couldbesuccessfullyassessed.
The results of our analysis are of
interest to college administrators, faculty, and the business community.
Specifically, data on the current state
of curriculum integration, support for
integration projects, and assessment
methods provide administrators an
understandingofhowtheprocessofcurriculum integration has been managed
at other institutions. This knowledge
is useful to business school administrators considering curricular integration. Information regarding the use of
alternative methods of integration is
helpfultofacultywhowillbereliedon
to implement this change in curriculum.Specifically,facultywillbeableto
identify commonly used (and presumablysuccessful)methodsofintegration
easily.Finally,theresultsofthisstudy
provide information to the business
community about the progress made
by business schools toward providing
studentswithabetterideaofhowbusinessesoperate.Thismaymotivatemore
cooperation between business schools
and the business community to ensure
successful implementation of the integratedcurriculumconcept.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
The authors thank theAssociation toAdvance
Collegiate Schools of Business International for
assistancewiththisproject.
NOTES
Manoj Athavale is an associate professor of
finance and chair of the Department of Finance
andInsuranceatBallStateUniversity.
RodDavisisaprofessorandtheInterimDean
of the Miller College of Business at Ball State
University.
Mark Myring is an associate professor of
accounting, theAlumni Distinguished Professor,
andDirectoroftheGraduatePrograminAccountingatBallStateUniversity.
Correspondence concerning this article should
beaddressedtoRodDavis,InterimDean,Miller
College of Business, Ball State University, 2000
UniversityAvenue,Muncie,IN47306,USA.
E-mail:Rdavis2@bsu.edu
REFERENCES
Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of
BusinessInternational(AACSB).(2002).Managementeducationatrisk:ReportoftheManagement Education Task Force to the AACSB
International Board of Directors. St. Louis,
MO:Author.
Bishop, S. K. (1999). Cross-functional project
teams in functionally aligned organizations.
ProjectManagementJournal,36,6–12.
Brunel,F.F.,&Hibbard,J.D.(2006).Usinginnovations in student teaming to leverage crossfunctional and marketing learning: Evidence
from a fully integrated undergraduate core.
MarketingEducationReview,16(3),15–23.
DeConinck, J., & Steiner, T. (1999). Developing an integrated finance and marketing MBA
core course. Journal of Marketing Education,
21,44–50.
DeMoranville, C.,Aurand, T. W., & Gordon, G.
L. (2000). The delivery of an undergraduate
cross-functional business principles program:
Oneuniversity’scontinuingjourney.Marketing
EducationReview,10(3),29–41.
Gerwin, D. (1999). Team empowerment in new
product development. Business Horizons, 42,
29–36.
Hamilton,D.,McFarland,D.,&Mirchandani,D.
(2000).Adecisionmodelforintegrationacross
businesscurriculuminthe21stcentury.Journal
ofManagementEducation,24(1),102–126.
Hazeldine, M., & Miles, M. (2007). Measuring
entrepreneurship in business schools. Journal
ofEducationforBusiness,82,234–240.
Heinfeldt, J., & Wolf, F. (1998). Re-engineering
the business curriculum: A stakeholder para-
digm. Journal of Education for Business, 73,
198–201.
Hennessey,P.(1999).Nomoresilos.Training&
Development,53, 32–37.
Kwok, C. C. Y. (1994). An empirical study on
financecurriculuminternationalization.FinancialPracticeandEducation,4(2),35–46.
Markulis, P., Howe, H. & Strang, D. (2005).
Integratingthebusinesscurriculumwithacomprehensivecasestudy:Aprototype.Simulation
andGaming,36,250–258.
Martell, K. (2007). Assessing student learning:
Are business schools making the grade? JournalofEducationforBusiness,82,189–195.
Miller, J. (2000). Economics in the integrated
business curriculum. Journal of Education for
Business,76,113–118.
Pharr, S.W. (2000). Foundational considerations
forestablishinganintegratedbusinesscommon
corecurriculum.JournalofEducationforBusiness,76,20–23.
Pharr,S.W.(2003).Integrationofthecorebusiness curriculum: Levels of involvement and
supportprovided.MarketingEducationReview,
13(1),21–31.
Porter,L.W.,&McKibbin,L.E.(1988).Managementeducationanddevelopment:Driftorthrust
intothe21stcentury?NewYork:McGraw-Hill.
Pringle,C.,&Michel,M.(2007).Assessmentpractices in AACSB-accredited business schools.
JournalofEducationforBusiness,82,202–211.
Ramaswamy, K. (1992). Enhancing business
school effectiveness: A multiple-constituency
approach. Journal of Education for Business,
67,353–357.
Ryan,C.(1999).Trendsinbusinesscurricula:The
view from AACSB. Business Communication
Quarterly,62(1),91–95.
Smith-Ducoffe, S. J., Tromley, C. L., & Tucker, M. (2006). Interdisciplinary, team-taught,
undergraduatebusinesscourses:Theimpactof
integration.JournalofManagementEducation,
30,276–294.
Stover, D., Morris, J. S., Pharr, S., Reyes, M.
G.,&Byers,C.R.(1997).Breakingdownthe
silos:Attaininganintegratedbusinesscommon
core.AmericanBusinessReview,15(2),1–11.
Young,M.R.,&Murphy,J.W.(2003).Integrating communications skills into the marketing
curriculum:Acasestudy.JournalofMarketing
Education,25(1),57–70.
Walker,K.B.,&Ainsworth,P.L.(2001).Developing a process approach in the business core
curriculum. Issues in Accounting Education,
16(1),41–66.
May/June2008
301
ISSN: 0883-2323 (Print) 1940-3356 (Online) Journal homepage: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/vjeb20
The Integrated Business Curriculum: An
Examination of Perceptions and Practices
Manoj Athavale , Rod Davis & Mark Myring
To cite this article: Manoj Athavale , Rod Davis & Mark Myring (2008) The Integrated Business
Curriculum: An Examination of Perceptions and Practices, Journal of Education for Business,
83:5, 295-301, DOI: 10.3200/JOEB.83.5.295-301
To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.3200/JOEB.83.5.295-301
Published online: 07 Aug 2010.
Submit your article to this journal
Article views: 93
View related articles
Citing articles: 10 View citing articles
Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at
http://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=vjeb20
Download by: [Universitas Maritim Raja Ali Haji]
Date: 11 January 2016, At: 23:13
TheIntegratedBusinessCurriculum:An
ExaminationofPerceptionsandPractices
MANOJATHAVALE
RODDAVIS
Downloaded by [Universitas Maritim Raja Ali Haji] at 23:13 11 January 2016
MARKMYRING
BALLSTATEUNIVERSITY
MUNCIE,INDIANA
ABSTRACT. Constituentsoftencriticize
businessschoolsforfailingtoprovidestudentswithacomprehensiveunderstanding
ofhowbusinessorganizationsfunction.
Businessschoolshaverespondedtothe
mandatewithattemptstointegrate
discipline-specificfunctionalknowledge
intoacoherentunderstandingoftheevolvingbusinessorganization.Successful
integrationoftheundergraduatebusiness
curriculumwillresultinstudentswho
aremoredirectlyinvolvedinthelearning
processandwillincreasecurricularrelevancebytranslatingfunctionalknowledge
intobusinessskills.However,curriculum
integrationisanextensiveandpotentially
disruptivecurricularchangethatmay
involvecostandisfraughtwithpitfalls.
Theauthorssurveyeddeansatmember
schoolsoftheAssociationtoAdvanceCollegiateSchoolsofBusinessInternationalto
assesstheextenttowhichandthemanner
inwhichintegrationhastakenplacewithin
thebusinesscurriculum.
Keywords:assessment,businessschools,
corecurriculum,integration
Copyright©2008HeldrefPublications
I
n this study, we surveyed deans at
schools that were members of the
Association to Advance Collegiate
Schools of Business International
(AACSB) to assess their perceptions
ofanintegratedcurriculumandalsoto
assesstheprogressmadeindeveloping
suchanintegratedbusinesscurriculum.
An integrated curriculum is designed
to emphasize the interrelationships
betweenfunctionalareasofabusiness,
thereby providing students with an
understanding of how businesses operate.Previousresearchhasprovidedthe
rational for and the methods used in
curriculumintegration,butnostudyhas
provided a comprehensive overview of
the current state of integrated curriculuminbusinessschools.Wetriedtofill
thisvoidintheresearch.
Anintegratedcurriculumisaninnovative method of business education
with a broad-based, multidisciplinary,
organization-centric approach. This
technique departs significantly from
traditional function-centric business
education. An integrated business curriculumoffersmanybenefits.However,
the development and successful implementationofthiseducationalchangeis
difficult.DeConinckandSteiner(1999)
suggestedthatanintegratedcurriculum
provides students with a better understanding of the dependencies between
thefunctionalareasofthefirm,emphasizes effective communication and the
abilitytoworkincross-functionalteams,
and fosters a better understanding of
organizational purpose, resources, and
functioning. In addition to the traditional focus on acquiring knowledge,
the integrated curriculum emphasizes
developing skills that are relevant to a
successfulcareer.
The extent of potential benefits and
the transformational nature of an integrated curriculum have resulted in
much attention in the scholarly literature. According to Hamilton, McFarland, and Mirchandani (2000), more
than 60 publications have reported on
20 different methods to integrate the
business curriculum at 35 universities.
Much of the existing literature focuses
on descriptions of the external forces
that create the demand for integration
(e.g.,Porter&McKibbin,1988;Stover,
Morris, Pharr, Reyes, & Byers, 1997)
or examines techniques used in curriculumintegration(e.g.,Brunel&Hibbard, 2006; DeMoranville, Aurand, &
Gordon, 2000; Kwok, 1994;Young &
Murphy, 2003). Although this literaturehasmadeasignificantcontribution
to the field, it fails to provide direct
evidence of the perception of business
schooldeansoftheforcesthatmotivate
integration.Inaddition,priorstudiesdo
not examine the frequency with which
proposed methods of integration are
used.Last,fewdataexistregardingthe
techniques used to assess the success
May/June2008
295
of curriculum integration.These issues
provide the motivation for the present
study.
Wesurveyedbusinessschooldeansto
examinetheperceivedneedtointegrate
thecurriculumandthefactorsmotivating
this need. We also examined the methods used in curriculum integration, the
resourcesallocated,thecurrentstatusof
theintegrationproject,andthemethods
ofassessingthesuccessonintegration.
Downloaded by [Universitas Maritim Raja Ali Haji] at 23:13 11 January 2016
DemandforandCost
ofCurriculumIntegration
Faculty, students, and the business
community exert significant pressure
and demands on the content and form
of business school curricula (Heinfeldt
&Wolf,1998;Ramaswamy,1992).The
businesscommunityprefersemployees
whoareteamplayers,understandorganizational interactions, and make decisions that benefit the entire company.
Ifcurriculumintegrationdevelopsthese
skills, employers will support initiatives in this area. Current and potential students may demand curriculum
integration(Smith-Ducoffe,Tromley,&
Tucker,2006)undertheperceptionthat
an integrated curriculum will provide
enhanced educational experiences and
betteremploymentopportunities.
Integrated curriculum development
haslargelybeentheresultofperceived
demand from the business community
for employees with multidisciplinary
skills. DeMoranville et al. (2000) stated that business organizations have
begun to focus on the development of
cross-functional teams.Although organizations value employees with cross-
functionalskills,evidencesuggeststhat
functionally aligned organizations find
it difficult to make the transition to
cross-functional teams (Bishop, 1999),
largelybecauseemployeeslackacrossfunctional perspective (Gerwin, 1999)
and associate with functional departments more than they associate with
organizationalgoals(Hennessey,1999).
Thiscreatesademandfromthebusiness
communityforstudentswhounderstand
how businesses operate and who can
performincross-functionalteams.
Students will likely attend business
schools that they believe will provide
the highest quality education and the
296
JournalofEducationforBusiness
bestemploymentopportunitiesongraduation. Employers value students who
have an understanding of how business organizations function. An integrated curriculum builds this skill set,
and hence potential employers may
recruit heavily at schools with such a
curriculum. Because of the benefits
that likely accrue to students (higher-
quality education and better employment opportunities) and the university
(prestige, enrollment, and budgets),
business school faculty have a strong
motivationtoattaintheobjectivesofan
integrated curriculum. Faculty involvement is important to this initiative
becauseitisthebusinessschoolfaculty
whowilldesign,implement,andassess
thesuccessoftheinitiative.
Although the AACSB tries to avoid
prescribingacookie-cutterbusinesscurriculum, the organization does list the
integratedcurriculumconceptasaninteresting new curricular development that
business schools need to look at, adapt,
orimproveon(Ryan,1999).Inaddition,
the AACSB standards recommend an
integrated core business curriculum and
analysisoforganizationalissuesusinga
cross-functionalmethodology.
The AACSB has played a key role
in influencing the business curriculum
by participating in influential studies
on standards and practices, which has
enabled universities to provide worldclassmanagementeducation.Porterand
McKibbin(1988)specificallyraisedthe
issueofcurriculumintegration.Thisproactiveprojectappraisedthethen-current
state of management education, consideredthelikelyfutureifnomajorchanges
were made, and developed a set of recommendationsforthedirectioninwhich
the profession should be moving. An
important conclusion from this project
wasthattherewasinsufficientemphasis
onintegrationacrossthefunctionalareas.
Theneedforcurriculumintegrationwas
reinforced in 2002 with the publication of Management Education at Risk:
Report of the Management Education
Task Force to the AACSB International
Board of Directors. In a section titled
“Blurring Disciplinary Boundaries,” the
AACSB(2002)statedthat
Aprimeexampleofconcernsaboutcurrencyandrelevanceofbusinesscurricula
relatestothefunctionalsilosthatprovide
theorganizationalframeworkfordepartments, core curricula, and even elective
courses in typical business degree programs. Yet actual business problems or
solutions rarely present themselves in
neatlyorganized,verticalsilos.(p.20)
The successful implementation of an
integratedcurriculumrequiresinvestment
of significant resources and substantial
effort on the part of the faculty. Failure
to garner these resources may account
fortherelativelylowlevelofintegration
in business schools today. Specifically,
inasurveyofAACSB-accreditedundergraduatebusinessschools,DeMoranville
et al. (2000) found that although most
(90%)hadaseniorcapstonecoursethat
integrated business functions, very few
(lessthan5%)hadacomprehensiveprogram that formally addressed the need
for cross-functional integration of businessprinciples.
Thesignificantcostsassociatedwith
thedeliveryofanintegratedcurriculum
may also play a role in its slow adoption. Kwok (1994) recognized the pitfalls associated with integration when
hesuggestedthatalthoughanintegrated
approach seems preferable, in reality
the extent and manner of integration
leavesmuchtobedesired.Pharr(2000,
2003)hasnotedthatthecauseofmany
oftheproblemscitedinintegratingthe
curriculum may be found in the attitudinal, infrastructure, and resource support allocated to the implementation
of an integrated curriculum. Another
hurdle to the development of an integrated curriculum is the need to align
facultyperceptionsoftheimportanceof
functional competence to the needs of
the integrated business-process-driven
curriculum.Thefailuretoalignperceptionsmayresultincurriculummodificationsthatveertowardabrokeredcompromise between functional disciplines
rather than a ground-up review of the
completebusinesscurriculum.
CommonMethodsofCurriculum
Integration
Untilrecently,manycollegesofbusiness relied entirely on a single course,
oftenaseniorcapstone,toprovidestudents with an integrated experience.
Becauseoftheperceiveddemandsexertedonthembythebusinesscommunity,
students,faculty,andAACSB,business
Downloaded by [Universitas Maritim Raja Ali Haji] at 23:13 11 January 2016
schoolshaveenhancedtheircoverageof
integrative topics and have considered
newtechniquesforachievingtheobjectives of an integrated curriculum. We
reviewsomecommonmethods.
The use of a comprehensive case
over the entire business curriculum is
acommonlyadoptedmethodologythat
delivers a consistent message on the
integrated nature of the business organization. Besides the desired objective
of introducing the students to the integrated nature of businesses, the case
approach can be used to provide students with semantic knowledge skills,
higher-ordercriticalthinkingskills,and
areal-worldorientation.Environmental
changes can also be incorporated in
cases on a periodic basis without the
need to make extensive modifications
tothecaseandwithoutlossofcontinuity.Markulis,Howe,andStrang(2005)
presented the rationale, methodology,
andprocessofdevelopingsuchacasebasedmodelforcurriculumintegration
andoutlinedplanstointegratethecase
intoupper-levelbusinesscourses.
Another model for delivery of an
integrated undergraduate curriculum
followstheentrepreneurialpathofnew
product development. Brunel and Hibbard (2006) described such a process,
wherein 4 traditional courses (marketing, operations, information systems,
and finance) are integrated into a 16credit, semester-long sequence. This
process culminates in a project in
which students develop a comprehensive business plan for a new consumer
product idea. Walker and Ainsworth
(2001) illustrated a similar businessprocessapproachtodeliveringthecore
undergraduate curriculum, consistent
withthetrendtowardprocess-managed
organizations. Their study also investigatedhowaccountingeducationcanbe
incorporatedintothismodelandhowa
process-centered curriculum may give
accountingstudentsabroaderandmore
integratededucationalexperience.
Somebusinessschoolshaveproposed
the use of course modules to integrate
the business curriculum. For example,
Miller (2000) reported on an attempt
to improve business and economics
instruction by integrating economics
and other undergraduate business disciplines that were previously taught in
stand-alone courses, into a 6-module
sequence over 2 semesters, and providedaqualitativebenefit–costanalysis
oftheintegrationeffort.
Awidevarietyofmethodshavebeen
used to integrate curriculum.Although
this research provides an interesting
descriptionofsomeofthenewermethods used in curricular integration, it
does not provide quantitative information about the commonly used techniques. Such information is of interest
to business schools whose administratorsaretryingtochooseamongalternativeintegrationmethods.Inthepresent
article, we fill this void by presenting
directevidenceonthisissue.
METHOD
Wedesignedthesurveythatweused
inthisstudytoprovidedataonthecurrent state of curriculum integration in
AACSBmemberschools.Itwasintended to capture information related to
attemptsatintegratingthecurriculum—
factors driving the change toward an
integrated curriculum, the techniques
used by business schools to meet the
goals of integration, and the methods
usedtoassessthesuccessofintegration
efforts. The survey comprises 29 questions:9demographicquestionsaboutthe
deans and their institution, 3 questions
abouttherespondent’sperceptionofthe
significanceofcurriculumintegration,4
questionsaboutthecurrentstatusofcurriculum integration at the respondent’s
school,7questionsaboutresourcesused
in the process, 2 questions about curriculumintegrationmethods,and4questionsabouttheassessmentofcurriculum
integrationefforts.
The AACSB provided us e-mail
addresses, which enabled us to communicate with business school deans.
Deansareoftensurveyedfortheirperceptionsonmattersofimportancetothe
academic community (e.g., Hazeldine
& Miles, 2007; Martell, 2007; Pringle
& Michel, 2007). However, to the best
ofourknowledge,ourswasthefirstsurvey to assess the extent and manner to
whichintegrationhastakenplacewithin
the business curriculum. In November
2005,wesenttobusinessschooldeans
TABLE1.BusinessSchoolDeans’PerceptionofNeedtoIntegratethe
BusinessCurriculum
Towhatdegreedoyouperceivetheneedtointegratetheundergraduatecorecurriculum?
Degree
Strongneed
Mildneed
Neutral
Verylittleneed
Noneed
Total
Frequency
69
47
20
6
1
143
%
48.2
32.9
14.0
4.2
0.7
100.0
Ifyouperceivethereisaneedtointegratetheundergraduatecorecurriculum,what
factorsmotivatedyourperception?
Factor
Criticaltofuturesuccessofstudents
Partofaccreditationrequirements
Encouragementorpressurefromrecruitersoremployers
Initiatedbyfaculty
Encouragementorpressurefromadvisoryboard
Pressurefromcurrentstudents
Thereisnoperceivedneedforintegration
Other
Total
Frequency
110
38
26
29
24
7
7
13
254
%
76.9
26.6
18.2
20.3
16.8
4.9
4.9
9.1
177.6
Note.Multipleresponseswereallowed.
May/June2008
297
a short e-mail explaining the purpose
oftheprojectandsolicitingtheircooperation in completing the project. The
e-mail directed participants to a Webbased survey to answer a brief questionnaire regarding their perceptions
about the integration process and their
school’s practices relating to curricular
integration.Afollow-upletterwassent
in December 2005. Of 630 deans, 143
chose to participate in the project, a
responserateofapproximately23%.
Downloaded by [Universitas Maritim Raja Ali Haji] at 23:13 11 January 2016
RESULTS
Wegroupedtheresultsofthissurvey
into five issues related to curriculum
integration:thesignificanceofcurriculum integration, the current status of
the integration process, methods used
to integrate the curriculum, resources necessary for integration, and an
assessment of integration efforts. We
first examined the perceived need to
integratethebusinesscurriculum,with
emphasisplacedontheunderlyingfactorsthatmotivatetheneedtointegrate.
Participantswereaskedtheirperception
oftheneedtointegratethecurriculum.
Results of this analysis are presented
in Table 1. Of the 143 respondents,
116(81.1%)reportedastrongneedor
a mild need to integrate the business
curriculum across disciplines. Based
ontheseresults,itisclearthatrespondentsbelieveintheimportanceofcurriculum integration across disciplines.
This result is not surprising given the
demandsplacedonbusinessschoolsto
integratethecurriculum.
Next, we examined the factors that
motivatedtheneedtointegratethecurriculum. Respondents were provided
withalistoffactorsandwereaskedto
select those that might have influenced
their perception of the need to integrate across disciplines. The results of
this analysis are presented in Table 1.
Respondents indicated that the most
important factor motivating curriculum
integrationwasthatitwascriticaltothe
futuresuccessofstudents(76.9%).Other
motivatingfactorscitedwereaccreditationrequirements(26.6%),partofafaculty initiative (20.3%), encouragement
orpressurefromrecruitersandemployers(18.2%),andencouragementorpressurefromadvisoryboards(16.8%).
298
JournalofEducationforBusiness
TABLE2.ParticipantResponsestotheQuestion,“Whichstatementbest
describesthecurrentstatusofundergraduatecurriculumintegration
effortsinyouracademicunit?”
Response
Wehaveexaminedtheconceptofintegrationandare
intheprocessofdevelopinganintegrationplan.
Wehavenotexaminedtheconceptofintegration.
Wehaveimplementedaplantointegratethe
undergraduatecorecurriculum.
Wehaveexaminedtheconceptofintegrationand
havedecidednottopursueit.
Westartedtheplanningprocessbutdiscontinued
effortsbeforeimplementation.
Total
Frequency
%
52
40
37.1
28.6
32
22.9
14
10.0
2
140
1.4
100.0
Note.Multipleresponseswereallowed.
TABLE3.MethodsofBusinessCurriculumIntegration
Whereshouldintegrationeffortsbemade?
Response
Corecurriculum
Businesspolicyandstrategycourse
Capstonecasecourse
Introductorybusinesscourse
Acrosstheentirecurriculum,including
coursesinthemajor
Other
Total
Frequency
%
105
92
88
69
73.4
64.3
61.5
48.3
39
8
401
27.3
5.6
280.4
Whatmethodshaveyouusedordoyouplantousetoprovideanintegratedcurriculum?
Method
Businesspolicyandstrategycourse
Useofcurrenttopics(e.g.,BusinessWeek,WallStreet
Journal)todiscusscross-disciplineimplications
Guestspeakers
Criticalthinkingandinterpersonalskills
Teamteaching
Acommonandconsistentmessage(e.g.,teamwork,
communicationskills,ethics)acrossthecurriculum
Useofcaseswithineachcourse
Communityservice,mentoring,andinternships
Multi-disciplinarystudentteams
Participationinlive,multi-disciplinaryprojectswith
localbusinesses
Useofacommoncaseacrosscorecourses
Developmentofnontraditionalmulti-disciplinarycourses
Individualfacultymembersteachingdiversedisciplines
Schedulecorecoursesasablockratherthan
assinglecourses
Refocuscurrentcurriculumonbusinessprocesses
Useofinformationsystemscomponentacross
corecourses
Lock-stepcurriculum
Other
Total
Note.Multipleresponseswereallowed.
Frequency
%
85
59.4
73
72
69
63
51.0
50.3
48.3
44.0
63
59
58
49
44.0
41.2
40.5
34.3
48
44
38
35
33.6
30.8
26.6
24.5
32
29
22.4
20.3
26
10
9
862
18.2
7.0
6.3
602.8
Downloaded by [Universitas Maritim Raja Ali Haji] at 23:13 11 January 2016
It is encouraging that respondents
concurred with the AACSB that curriculumintegrationisimportanttoprovidinghigh-qualityeducation.Itisalso
importanttonotethatrespondentsperceivedthattheiradvisoryboards,which
generally comprise professionals from
outside the colleges of business, favor
integrationofthecurriculum.
We next examined the current status of integration efforts at business
schools.Becauseoftheperceptionthat
integrationisanimportantfactorinthe
success of business school graduates,
itisrationaltoexpectsignificantprogresstowardcurriculumintegration.The
current status of integration efforts are
presentedinTable2.Surprisingly,40%
ofschoolseitherhadnotexaminedthe
conceptofcurriculumintegrationorhad
examined the concept and decided not
to pursue it. Only 22.9% of schools
had implemented a plan to integrate
the undergraduate core curriculum,
although 37.1% of schools were in the
processofdevelopingaplanforcurricularintegration.Thislackofintegration
maybeduetothehighcostsassociated
withcurriculumintegration.
Therearemanyplacesinthebusiness
curriculum where integration could take
place.Weprovidedparticipantswithalist
of logical places for curriculum integration and asked them to choose where,
in their perception, the integration effort
shouldbemade.TheresultsofthisanalysisarepresentedinTable3.Mostrespondents believed that the appropriate place
forcurriculumintegrationwasinthecore
curriculum (73.4%). A business policy
and strategy course (64.3%), a capstone
casecourse(61.5%),andanintroductory
businesscourse(48.3%)werealsofavored
places in which to integrate the curriculum.Thisfindingsuggeststhatintegration
couldcommonlyoccuratmultiplestages
inthebusinesscurriculum.
An important consideration for the
many institutions whose administrators
areplanningcurriculumintegrationisthe
method used to achieve curricular integration. Table 3 presents methods that
business school administrators planned
to use or had used to provide an integrated curriculum. The most common
methodforfacilitatingcurricularintegration was the use of the business policy
andstrategycourse(59.4%),followedby
TABLE4.ResourcesforBusinessCurriculumIntegration
Ifyouarepursuingorhaveimplementedcurricularintegration,whatresources
facilitatedintegrationefforts?
Resource
Interestorcommitmentfromfaculty
InformationorattendanceatAACSBconferences
Financialincentivestofacultytoconduct
curriculumdevelopment
Teachingloadreductions
Fundingforrelatedfacultyresearch
Other
Wearenotpursuinganintegratedcurriculum
Total
Frequency
%
61
34
42.7
23.8
20
16
13
8
21
173
14.0
11.2
9.1
5.6
14.7
121.0
Towhatextentdoyouagreethat,inthefuture,newfacultyhireswillneedtobemore
cross-disciplined?
Response
Stronglyagree
Mildlyagree
Neutral
Mildlydisagree
Stronglydisagree
Total
Frequency
43
53
23
15
5
139
%
30.9
38.1
16.5
10.8
3.6
100.0
Note.Multipleresponseswerenotallowed.AACSB=AssociationtoAdvanceCollegiate
SchoolsofBusinessInternational.
discussions of cross-disciplinary implications arising from current topic readings from popular business periodicals
(51.0%)andinvitationofguestspeakers
forinteractionwithbusinesspractitioners
relating integrated business practices in
their business (50.3%). Many schools
achievedcurricularintegrationbydeveloping new courses or improving the
method of delivery. Courses that developed critical thinking and interpersonal
skills (48.3%), encouraged team teaching (44.0%), and ensured a consistent
message—forexample,teamwork,communicationskills,andethics—acrossthe
curriculum(44.0%)werealsothefocus
of integration efforts. Other commonly
adoptedpracticesincludedtheextensive
useofcaseswithincoursesandbusiness
interactionsthroughcommunityservice,
mentoring,andinternships.
Business schools adopted multiple
methods to ensure curricular integration, with the average business school
adopting six methods from those listed
in Table 3. Further, the methods listed
are not exclusive. Thus, the business
policyandstrategycoursecouldinclude
theuseofcasesandguestspeakersand
could involve multidisciplinary teams
thatparticipateinliveprojectswithlocal
businesses. Another theme that arises
from the data that we present is that
most schools perceived that the objectives of curricular integration could be
achieved through interaction with practitioners from outside academia. Note
theuseofguestspeakers(50.3%);community service, mentoring, and internships(40.5%);andparticipationinlive,
multidisciplinary projects with local
businesses(33.6%).Last,mostbusiness
schoolsreliedonthebusinesspolicyand
strategycourse(59.4%)toachievesome
measure of curricular integration, and
thatrelianceshouldmotivatetheneedfor
reviewing course content, hiring crossdiscipline trained faculty, engaging in
teamteachingtosupplementskills,and
focusing on this course for assessment
of student learning as part of the curriculummanagementprocess.
Theimportanceofbusinesscorecurriculumintegrationtothefuturesuccess
May/June2008
299
TABLE5.AssessmentofBusinessCurriculumIntegration
Towhatextentdoyouagreethatcurriculumintegrationcanbeeffectivelyassessed?
Response
Frequency
Stronglyagree
Mildlyagree
Neutral
Mildlydisagree
Stronglydisagree
Total
34
70
27
9
0
140
%
24.3
50.0
19.3
6.4
0.0
100.0
Whatdirectmeasuresareusedtoassesscurriculumintegration?
Downloaded by [Universitas Maritim Raja Ali Haji] at 23:13 11 January 2016
Response
Frequency
Performanceinanintegrativecapstonecourse
Caseanalysis
Businessplan
Graduationorexitexam
Traditionalexams
Businesssimulation
Pretestandposttest
Idon’tknow
Other
Total
64
52
37
34
34
29
25
21
16
312
%
44.7
36.4
25.9
23.8
23.8
20.3
17.5
14.7
11.2
218.2
Whatindirectmeasuresareusedtoassesscurriculumintegration?
Response
Frequency
Seniorexitsurvey
Alumnisurvey
Facultydiscussion
Employersurvey
Advisoryboarddiscussion
Studentfocusgroups
Comparisonwithtargetedlevelsoflearning
Facultylevelaccountabilitythroughannualreview
Bloom’staxonomy
Placementrecord
Recruitmentofcross-disciplinarytrainedfaculty
Idon’tknow
Other
Total
69
55
54
45
41
41
33
25
23
19
18
17
11
451
%
48.2
38.5
37.8
31.5
28.7
28.7
23.1
17.5
16.1
13.3
12.5
11.9
7.7
315.4
Note.Multipleresponseswereallowed.
of students and the diverse methods
used to integrate curriculum necessitateanassessmentoftheresourcesthat
businessschoolshavecommittedtothe
process.Analysis of the resources that
such schools have provided to support
curricular integration is presented in
Table4.Itisnotsurprisingthatthemain
factorthatfacilitatedcurricularintegration was faculty commitment (42.7%).
A relatively small number of universities (23.8%) had funded attendance at
300
JournalofEducationforBusiness
AACSB conferences, and even fewer
provided financial incentives (14.0%)
or teaching load reductions (11.2%) to
faculty pursuing integration initiatives.
Thefactthatcurriculumintegrationhas
notbeenmoreaggressivelyencouraged
and supported with adequate resources
isindeedsurprising.
A large proportion of respondents
(69.0%) believed that future faculty-
hiringpracticeswouldneedtoconsider
thecross-disciplinarycapabilitiesofnew
hires.Thisfindingshowedasignificant
commitment to curriculum integration.
Such changes in hiring practices may
have implications for the recruitment
and training of candidates at doctoral
institutions.
Last,wealsoexaminedrespondents’
perceptionsoftheirabilitytoassessthe
extenttowhichthecurriculumhadbeen
integrated and the methods commonly
adoptedtoconductsuchanassessment.
TheseresultsarepresentedinTable5.
TheinformationpresentedinTable5
shows that most respondents (74.3%)
believed that curriculum integration
couldbeaffectivelyassessed.Examining
this issue in greater detail, we identifiedbothdirectandindirectmeasuresof
assessment.Oursurveyresultsindicated
that performance in an integrative capstone course (44.7%) and case analysis
(36.4%) were the most common direct
techniquesusedinassessmentofcurriculumintegration,andaseniorexitsurvey
(48.2%),analumnisurvey(38.5%),and
a faculty discussion (37.8%) were the
most common indirect techniques used
inassessmentofcurriculumintegration.
Institutionsdidnotrelyononlyasingle
measure of assessment but on average
used2.18directand3.15indirectassessmenttechniques.
DISCUSSION
In this article, we examined the currentstatusofeffortstomakethebusiness
curriculum more relevant to the future
successofbusinessstudentsbyimprovingcorebusinessknowledgeandproviding a better understanding of the integrativenatureofbusinessorganizations.
Althoughpriorresearchhasoutlinedthe
needtointegratethecurriculumandhas
describedeffortsmadeinthisdirection,
we believe that the present study providesacomprehensiveassessmentofthe
currentstateofcurricularintegration.
Our results indicate that business
schools have responded to the demands
of various constituents and perceive curricular integration as an important issue.
However,curricularintegrationisacostly and time-consuming process fraught
withpitfalls.Manybusinessschoolshave
made little significant progress toward
design, implementation, and assessment.
Our analysis of the present results also
Downloaded by [Universitas Maritim Raja Ali Haji] at 23:13 11 January 2016
indicate that methods of integration and
thepointatwhichintegrationisintroduced
varysignificantlyacrossbusinessschools.
Despite the perceived need for curricular integration, relatively few resources
havebeencommittedtothisactivity.Last,
respondentsfeltthatcurricularintegration
couldbesuccessfullyassessed.
The results of our analysis are of
interest to college administrators, faculty, and the business community.
Specifically, data on the current state
of curriculum integration, support for
integration projects, and assessment
methods provide administrators an
understandingofhowtheprocessofcurriculum integration has been managed
at other institutions. This knowledge
is useful to business school administrators considering curricular integration. Information regarding the use of
alternative methods of integration is
helpfultofacultywhowillbereliedon
to implement this change in curriculum.Specifically,facultywillbeableto
identify commonly used (and presumablysuccessful)methodsofintegration
easily.Finally,theresultsofthisstudy
provide information to the business
community about the progress made
by business schools toward providing
studentswithabetterideaofhowbusinessesoperate.Thismaymotivatemore
cooperation between business schools
and the business community to ensure
successful implementation of the integratedcurriculumconcept.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
The authors thank theAssociation toAdvance
Collegiate Schools of Business International for
assistancewiththisproject.
NOTES
Manoj Athavale is an associate professor of
finance and chair of the Department of Finance
andInsuranceatBallStateUniversity.
RodDavisisaprofessorandtheInterimDean
of the Miller College of Business at Ball State
University.
Mark Myring is an associate professor of
accounting, theAlumni Distinguished Professor,
andDirectoroftheGraduatePrograminAccountingatBallStateUniversity.
Correspondence concerning this article should
beaddressedtoRodDavis,InterimDean,Miller
College of Business, Ball State University, 2000
UniversityAvenue,Muncie,IN47306,USA.
E-mail:Rdavis2@bsu.edu
REFERENCES
Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of
BusinessInternational(AACSB).(2002).Managementeducationatrisk:ReportoftheManagement Education Task Force to the AACSB
International Board of Directors. St. Louis,
MO:Author.
Bishop, S. K. (1999). Cross-functional project
teams in functionally aligned organizations.
ProjectManagementJournal,36,6–12.
Brunel,F.F.,&Hibbard,J.D.(2006).Usinginnovations in student teaming to leverage crossfunctional and marketing learning: Evidence
from a fully integrated undergraduate core.
MarketingEducationReview,16(3),15–23.
DeConinck, J., & Steiner, T. (1999). Developing an integrated finance and marketing MBA
core course. Journal of Marketing Education,
21,44–50.
DeMoranville, C.,Aurand, T. W., & Gordon, G.
L. (2000). The delivery of an undergraduate
cross-functional business principles program:
Oneuniversity’scontinuingjourney.Marketing
EducationReview,10(3),29–41.
Gerwin, D. (1999). Team empowerment in new
product development. Business Horizons, 42,
29–36.
Hamilton,D.,McFarland,D.,&Mirchandani,D.
(2000).Adecisionmodelforintegrationacross
businesscurriculuminthe21stcentury.Journal
ofManagementEducation,24(1),102–126.
Hazeldine, M., & Miles, M. (2007). Measuring
entrepreneurship in business schools. Journal
ofEducationforBusiness,82,234–240.
Heinfeldt, J., & Wolf, F. (1998). Re-engineering
the business curriculum: A stakeholder para-
digm. Journal of Education for Business, 73,
198–201.
Hennessey,P.(1999).Nomoresilos.Training&
Development,53, 32–37.
Kwok, C. C. Y. (1994). An empirical study on
financecurriculuminternationalization.FinancialPracticeandEducation,4(2),35–46.
Markulis, P., Howe, H. & Strang, D. (2005).
Integratingthebusinesscurriculumwithacomprehensivecasestudy:Aprototype.Simulation
andGaming,36,250–258.
Martell, K. (2007). Assessing student learning:
Are business schools making the grade? JournalofEducationforBusiness,82,189–195.
Miller, J. (2000). Economics in the integrated
business curriculum. Journal of Education for
Business,76,113–118.
Pharr, S.W. (2000). Foundational considerations
forestablishinganintegratedbusinesscommon
corecurriculum.JournalofEducationforBusiness,76,20–23.
Pharr,S.W.(2003).Integrationofthecorebusiness curriculum: Levels of involvement and
supportprovided.MarketingEducationReview,
13(1),21–31.
Porter,L.W.,&McKibbin,L.E.(1988).Managementeducationanddevelopment:Driftorthrust
intothe21stcentury?NewYork:McGraw-Hill.
Pringle,C.,&Michel,M.(2007).Assessmentpractices in AACSB-accredited business schools.
JournalofEducationforBusiness,82,202–211.
Ramaswamy, K. (1992). Enhancing business
school effectiveness: A multiple-constituency
approach. Journal of Education for Business,
67,353–357.
Ryan,C.(1999).Trendsinbusinesscurricula:The
view from AACSB. Business Communication
Quarterly,62(1),91–95.
Smith-Ducoffe, S. J., Tromley, C. L., & Tucker, M. (2006). Interdisciplinary, team-taught,
undergraduatebusinesscourses:Theimpactof
integration.JournalofManagementEducation,
30,276–294.
Stover, D., Morris, J. S., Pharr, S., Reyes, M.
G.,&Byers,C.R.(1997).Breakingdownthe
silos:Attaininganintegratedbusinesscommon
core.AmericanBusinessReview,15(2),1–11.
Young,M.R.,&Murphy,J.W.(2003).Integrating communications skills into the marketing
curriculum:Acasestudy.JournalofMarketing
Education,25(1),57–70.
Walker,K.B.,&Ainsworth,P.L.(2001).Developing a process approach in the business core
curriculum. Issues in Accounting Education,
16(1),41–66.
May/June2008
301