M01691
Theorizing Students’ Attributions on Their EFL Learning Process
Yustinus Calvin Gai Mali
Universitas Kristen Satya Wacana
E-mail: [email protected]
Abstract
This study explores students’ attributions for success and failure in their English
as a Foreign Language (EFL) learning process at English Language Education
Study Program, Satya Wacana Christian University (ED-SWCU). For data
collection, a semi-structured interview was conducted with three ED-SWCU
students. The results appear to prove that the students’ negative environment,
time management, and negative habits are the attributions for their failure, while
strategies and family support are the primary attributions for their success. In
essence, the results would seem to indicate that external influences primarily
take an essential role in the students’ failure and success in their learning
process. The interconnections possibly state that classroom teachers cannot
completely be the one who handles the particular outcomes of their students’
EFL learning. In light of the findings, this study proposes some pedagogical
ideas for the development of EFL teaching and learning particularly in
Indonesian Higher Education context.
Keywords: attributions, failure, success, EFL learning process
Introduction
Limiting our view of teaching and learning relationships primarily to the teacher’s
perspective provides only a partial view of classroom life and thus limited
understanding of teaching and learning processes in classroom. Attention must be
given to student experience if we are to more fully understand these relationships
and processes among teachers and students (Prentiss, 1995, p.27).
Teaching is not always a matter of transmitting knowledge to students (Harmer,
2007; Alwasilah, 2013) since they sometimes need to be listened and cared for
(Smith, 2012).
Ideas to conduct this study are from the researcher’s experience as a teacher. He
likes to come earlier to his classroom, spend some minutes to walk around the class, and
talk to his students more specifically to discuss their study. In that case, he usually asks
them about the progress of their study as well as whether they enjoy their learning
process, have questions to ask or need to share their academic problems.
One day, the researcher had an opportunity to talk to a student who was absent at
the first meeting of his class. The researcher started the conversation by asking his name
and reasons why he did not come to the class. The student introduced his name and
explained the reasons for his absences, which, in fact, led him to share stories dealing
with his learning process at the English Language Education Study Program, Faculty of
Language and Literature, Satya Wacana Christian University (ED-SWCU). In his stories,
the student told his experience when he failed in some courses that drastically lowered his
Grade Point Average (GPA). He also told his struggle to enhance his performance, so he
can presently pass the courses and successfully increase his GPA. Reflecting on the story,
the researcher starts to think about exploring further students’ attributions, an affective
factor in second language acquisition (Brown, 2007), on their English as a Foreign
Language (EFL), “situations where students were learning English to use it with any
other English speakers in the world” (Harmer, 2007, p.19), learning process.
Literature suggests some definitions of the term attribution. Dornyei (2001) defines
it as “an explanation people offer about why they were successful or, more importantly,
why they failed in the past” (p.118). It is also an explanation that learners provide for the
progress of their second language learning (Ellis, 2008) and reasons that they attribute to
their success or failure when they are in the process of learning a target language
(Gonzales, 2011). Based on ideas mentioned above, the study regards the attribution as
explanations and reasons that people provide for progress, achievement, and even failure
towards something they have experienced, particularly in their language learning.
It is well noted that the attribution can influence students’ learning motivation and
academic achievement. Weiner (1972) believes that the attribution process is an essential
determinant of learning and performance in a classroom. Lei (2009) asserts that
attribution made toward the success or failure in studying will result in changes in
expectations and emotions, which possibly affect motivation that individuals have for
learning and subsequently for their academic achievement. Weiner (1992) as cited in
Dornyei (2001, p.10) claims, “the individual explanations of why past successes and
failures have occurred have consequences on the person’s motivation to initiate future
action.” The theory proposes a framework that can help teachers in interpreting their
students’ claim such as “I cannot do this task.” After understanding its underlying factor,
the teachers may start to change the negative attitude.
In the field of education, some international studies have been conducted to explore
students’ attributions in the process of their English as a Second Language (ESL) and
EFL learning. The studies involved students from different educational levels. Some of
them are particularly secondary students (Williams, Burden, Poulet, & Maun, 2004; Farid
& Iqbal, 2012) and higher education students (Tse, 2000; Gobel & Mori; 2007; Mori,
Gobel, Thepsiri, & Pojanapunya, 2010; Zohri, 2011; Thang, Gobel, Mohd.Nor, &
Suppiah, 2011; Yilmaz, 2012; Mali, 2015a).
Tse (2000) conducted a qualitative study involving 51 University students who
learned a foreign language while they were studying in the United States. The study
revealed that the students’ attributions for the success in their learning were related to
external factors. They were their teachers and professors’ willingness to support their
learning, language inputs from their family, and community interactions. On the other
hand, most of the students believe that a low level of success in the study of their foreign
language was because of themselves. They admitted that they did not have enough
practice and not spend their time sufficiently to study the language.
In 2010, Mori, et al. sought to explore how EFL university students in Thailand
and Japan judged their successes and failures towards some language learning tasks. The
study would seem to indicate that the students regard their teacher’s influence and
classroom atmosphere as primary factors for their success. Conversely, the students
perceive a lack of ability and effort as the causes of their failures.
Zohri (2011) undertook a more recent study investigating Moroccoan university
students’ perceptions of failure. The study involved three hundred and thirty-three
subjects who studied English. The findings indicated that teachers’ attitude, effort/hard
work, interest, and pressure became the attributions for failure in their study.
In Pakistan, Farid and Iqbal (2012) conducted another related study. The results of
their study emphasized parents and teachers as a cause of success than failure for learning
outcomes. In a sense, this would be in harmony with ideas that people who are close to
students would greatly influence their attitudes to their language learning (Harmer, 2007).
Graham (1994) as cited in Dornyei (2001) also addresses ideas on typical
attributions on students’ successes and failures. He regards ability, effort, task difficulty,
and luck as the most common attributions in school environments. Other possible factors
deal with mood, family background, and help or hindrance from others.
Nevertheless, to the best of the researcher’s knowledge, there have been a limited
number of studies that sought to explore the issues possessed by undergraduates in the
Indonesian context, where English is considered as a foreign language. Thus, this study
aims to explore students’ attribution for their failure and successes in their EFL learning
process at the Study Program. With these in minds, the researcher aims to answer the
following research question: "What are students’ attributions for their failure and success
on their EFL learning process at ED-SWCU?”
Although the purpose of the present study might sound similar to that conducted by
the previous studies, the researcher still maintains that deeply exploring students’ real life
experience can be expected to contribute towards wider discussions of the attribution
studies. Besides, this study hopes to provide ED-SWCU teachers with insights related to
possible reasons for their students’ successes and failures in their language learning, so
they can develop a better understanding of helping their students avoid the failures, in
teaching all their students, and in helping them to achieve their successes in their
language learning.
Research Method
This research was designed qualitatively to explore students’ attributions for failure
and success on their EFL learning process at ED-SWCU. In particular, the research
employed a grounded theory approach. It aims to build a theory that faithfully reflects the
evidence or, in other words, to build a theory constructed from and grounded in the data
(Strauss & Corbin, 1990, as cited in Neuman, 2006). The approach also enables the
researcher to understand the nature and meaning of an experience for a particular group
of people in a particular setting (Glaser and Strauss, 1967, as cited in Moustakas, 1994,
p.4).” Though Gobel and Mori (2007) believe that using qualitative methods would seem
to follow the general trend in conducting an attribution research, the researcher has mixed
feelings about it. He still maintains that the methods can open up silent ideas possessed
by the research participants without being limited by one’s pre-understanding. The
methods are expected to result in richer findings related to the attribution issues within
the particular context.
Participants
The participants in this research were 3 ED-SWCU students; (2 males and 1
female). They are all the seventh-semester students who have spent two and half years
studying at the Study Program. The selection of the research participants was due to the
consideration that all of them have experienced the similar issues in their learning
process. The experience covers their failure in some courses at ED-SWCU and their
struggle to enhance their performance, so they can now pass the courses and successfully
increase their GPA. Besides, accessibility to meet them regularly in Second Language
Acquisition class, flexibility to conduct the research, and the participants’ willingness to
participate further in this research within a certain period were other essential factors for
selecting the participants. In this research, their names were kept in pseudonyms to keep
their confidentiality.
Materials
For the data collection, the researcher conducted a semi-structured interview, in
which an interviewer may ask a series of structured questions to his interviewees and
explore more deeply with open-form questions to obtain further information from them
(Gall, Gall, & Borg, 2007). In this research, the interviewees were asked to tell and
reconstruct their stories dealing with the attributions. The researcher conducted the
interview in Bahasa Indonesia to ensure that they could completely understand all
questions in the interview and, therefore, provide clear and deep responses.
Data collection
The interview section was conducted on three different occasions. They were on
October 31st, 2014 for interviewing the first participant, on November 7th, 2014 for
interviewing the second participant, and finally on November 12th, 2014 for interviewing
the third participant. The researcher started the interview by asking the participants to tell
their brief personal information. Then, they were asked to tell their experience of failure
and success in their learning process since the beginning of their study at ED-SWCU. In
this research, the term failure was defined as a situation when the students either got a bad
result or failed in a course. The term success, on the other hand, indicated that the
students could learn from mistakes making them fail the course, enhance their
performance, so they could successfully increase their GPA. The researcher recorded,
transcribed, and analyzed all the information from the interview to identify common
themes related to the issues. Within a week period after the interview session, the
researcher met each participant to show the interview transcription, let him/her read it and
add information towards his/her responses. It was done to ensure whether the participant
still needed to clarify his/her responses.
Data analysis
In this research, the researcher followed an inductive data analysis as adapted from
Hatch (2002); Ary et al. (2010). First, the researcher re-read repeatedly the interview
transcription, so he could break the data into some analyzable parts/ units. In that case, he
developed two general parts of analysis, namely attributions [1] for the students’ failure
and [2] for the students’ success. Second, he started to develop a set of categories of
meaning reflecting a cause-effect relation for each analyzable part. Third, he underlined
some responses that were in line with the issues and supported the discussions of the
emerging categories. That step was followed by reducing responses that were not salient
and related to the issues discussed in this research. Last, he searched for relationships
among the categories. These processes would eventually result in emerging themes about
the students’ attributions for their failures and successes in their EFL learning process at
ED-SWCU.
Findings and Discussion
The study aims to answer the research question; "What are students’ attributions
for their failure and success on their EFL learning process at ED-SWCU?" To answer the
question, the discussions in this part are divided into three sections namely [1] the
students’ learning process, [2] the students’ attributions for the failure and [3] the
students’ attributions for the success. The first section covers the summary of
participants’ experience extracted from the interview data (ITD) while the next two
sections clarify core themes extracted from the data presented in the first section. The
themes would become the answer to the research question.
The Students’ Learning Process
Doni’s story
His name is Doni. He was born in Salatiga twenty-six years ago. He has started to
learn English since he was in the first grade of Junior High School, meaning that he has
been studying English for more-less six years before entering ED-SWCU. The motivation
to study at the Study Program is the fact that he wants to become an English teacher. He
enjoyed his process studying English in his initial semesters. It was the first time for him
to be in classrooms whose communication during teaching and learning processes was
done in English. It was a new challenge for him. He was also happy because he could
meet new friends in his campus and practice his listening skills in a language laboratory,
the one he had not experienced in his schools.
Nevertheless, the situation was very different when he entered his fifth semester.
He admitted that he had socialized with his “wrong” friends. They were nice but,
unfortunately, liked to do negative things, which influenced his decision to join an
activity (Doni-FL-ITD-FRN). At first, he did not do the activity regularly until he, on one
occasion, gained many temporal benefits that soon made him do anything to keep him
involving in the activity.
The activity also made him stay awake at all night. With his sleepless nights, he
simply decided to join morning classes held at seven o’clock. As a result, he did not feel
fresh being in the classroom, so he could not follow the classroom discussions and
understand the points explained by his teacher (Doni-FL-ITD-PSC). Staying awake all
the night made him feel lazy to go to the campus. In that case, he did not deny that most
of his E scores, causing his failures, were because of his frequent absences in his
classroom. Besides, the bad score was due to his usual decision not to continue a course
when he knew that he obtained a bad result in his first progress test (Doni-FL-ITD-HBT).
The similar things had happened for five semesters. He could not control them.
Knowing the condition, Doni’s mother decided to visit him in Salatiga, finished all
his problems, and helped him to have a better life. She met the Chairperson of the Study
Program to discuss whether he could continue his study. He thought that it was all his
mother’s work that made him be a better person than what he was in the past (Doni-SCITD-FMY). The presence of his mother also significantly makes him stop doing the
activity. Moreover, he has started to consider his present age that is getting older and to
think that if his GPA remains low, it will be difficult for him to obtain a job (Doni-SCITD-SLR).
Dono’s story
Dono, a twenty-one-year-old student, was the second participant involved in this
study. He comes from Central Java. He has been learning English since he was in his
fourth grade of elementary school. He never thought that he would study English at the
Study Program since his passion was more on music. The fact that his brother is an
alumnus from the Study Program influenced his decision to study there. Besides, he soon
realized that he could work in many different places with his Bachelor of Education
Degree. At the beginning of his study, he just considered things he learned in classrooms
would only deal with how to be a teacher. It turned out to be wrong. In fact, he found out
that studying at the Study Program required him to learn some linguistics theories, such
as semantics, phonetics, and other related theories.
In his first semester, he felt so nervous specifically when he entered the Integrated
Course (IC) class consisting of eight credits. All students were expected to pass the class
and were only given a chance to repeat the class once. Being failed in the class twice
means that they would be recommended to quit their study from ED-SWCU.
Nevertheless, he could pass the class in his C score, regarded as a very minimum score
for the class. In that case, he mentioned that he frequently read IC books and asked his
brother questions about how he learned the materials, how to improve his grammatical
accuracy, and what to prepare for the test (Dono-SC-ITD-STR).
Though he passed the course, his overall score from his first semester to the fifth
semester got worse and was out of his expectation. For instance, he told that his GPA in
the fourth semester was only one. He admitted that such failure was because he liked to
postpone doing assignments that he did not like and to be absent in some of his classes,
such as Academic Writing and Academic Reading classes (Dono-FL-ITD-HBT). The
fourth and fifth semesters were obviously the worst semesters in his study.
His failure in the semesters meant a lot to him. It became a turning point for him to
enhance his performance in his upper semesters. He started to think that doing the same
things continuously would make him fail to finish his study. It would also disappoint his
parents who have worked very hard for his study. Therefore, he always comes to his
classes and does all his assignments with his very best efforts.
Further, he always remembers what his mother did to him when he experienced
such failure in the semesters. He was amazed at his mother who was not angry after she
knew the situation faced by her son. She always encourages and reminds him to study
harder and more diligently (Dono-SC-ITD-FMY). That makes him ask himself why his
mother can be so patient with him. He has promised to himself that he has to do his very
best in his study and be able to graduate in year two thousand and sixteen.
Dini’s story
Her name is Dini. She is a twenty-year-old student coming from Salatiga, Central
Java. She has been learning English since she was in her fourth grade of Elementary
School. She is interested in studying at ED-SWCU because she wants to continue what
she learned in her language class in Senior High School.
She felt anxious entering her classroom at the beginning of her study. She
remembered her experience in her Extensive Reading class, which was held at seven
o’clock in the morning and taught by a native speaker teacher who could not speak
Bahasa Indonesia at all. She was nervous whenever the teacher asked her questions in
English as she could not respond it using the same language. She was also afraid of
making mistakes. Therefore, she frequently kept silent during the class. Besides feeling
anxious, she admitted that the result of her study in the first semester was out of her
expectation. She could not manage her time well, so she did not have enough time to
study. She told that she had to teach her private students and use the money she obtained
to pay her first semester’s fee (Dini-FL-ITD-ATY).
She could enhance her performance in the second semester. She met her mentor,
whom she had more time to practice her English with (Dini-SC-ITD-MNR). Besides, the
mentor was her source of inspiration advising that she should positively consider her
failure as her encouragement to do better in her future. Her decision to live in a rented
house also helped her to enhance her performance. There, she could meet students,
coming from outside Java, with whom she could share her academic problems and
encourage one another (Dini-SC-ITD-FRN).
In her subsequent semester, she valued her being able to enhance her writing skill,
specifically dealing with her grammar accuracy in her writing. She notes that she can
learn more about grammar when she teaches it to other people (Dini-SC-ITD-STR). It is
not when she learns it from her teacher or listens to the teacher’s explanation in the
classroom.
In her fifth semester, she had to a join an activity, assigned by her scholarship
sponsor. The activity assigned her to hold an event working and involving many people
coming from different universities and faculties in Indonesia. The event was even bigger
that the annual drama performance held by the Study Program (Dini-SC-ITD-ATY). As a
result, she found it difficult to handle all the things and her academic matters at the same
time. She just felt that she only had limited time to study and finish all her classrooms’
assignments, so she could not do her best to finish them.
The Students’ Attributions for the Failure
Dealing with the attributions to the students’ failure, the study extracts some
possible themes from the text description. The first theme is a negative environment.
Making a relation with friends who have negative behavior causes problems to Doni’s
study. They successfully involve him in the activity that makes him have his sleepless
days. As a result, he cannot attend his morning classes and finish all his assignments.
Such condition is the reason for his frequent classroom absences that make him fail in a
class. This experience appears to become corroboration towards the view that people who
are close to students would greatly influence their attitudes to their language learning
(Harmer, 2007). It also might be a clarification that hindrance from others was as typical
attributions on students’ failure (Graham, 1994, as cited in Dornyei, 2001). Time
management and negative habits are other themes extracted from the text. It shows that
the students find it difficult to manage their time when they specifically have to deal with
their overloaded activities. They do not have a sufficient time to finish their classroom
assignments.
The Students’ Attributions for the Success
Williams, et al. (2004) state that to differentiate between effort and strategy is not
easy to do. Therefore, this study regards the term strategy operationally as a directed
effort. Interestingly, teaching learning materials to other people is revealed as a strategy
that can help Dini to enhance her grammar. In other words, she can learn grammar better
when she teaches it to other people. Spending time to read books and asking questions to
one’s brother and mentor are other helpful strategies that help Dono and Dini during their
learning process. In a sense, this would endorse Tse’s (2000) findings that language input
from students’ family and community interactions became their attributions for the
success in their learning. The findings conceivably prove that inputs that students obtain
outside their classrooms help them to learn the language.
It is also obvious that students need to keep developing a proper learning strategy
for their EFL learning. Within a classroom, teachers can invite students to share their
experience of learning strategies that they usually do in enhancing their English skills. It
is also possible for teachers to share their experience of their failure and success when
they were still students and practical ways to be successful language learners.
Family support is also invaluable for Doni and Dono. Specifically, the study
reveals the fact that a mother takes an essential role in the progress of their study. She is
the one who encourages Dono to study more diligently. This condition successfully
makes Dono promise to himself that he has to finish his study soon. She is also a person
who cares about Doni’s difficult situation. She helps him to solve all his problems. In a
sense, the findings are in harmony with Harmer’s (2007) view that people who are close
to students would greatly influence their attitudes to their language learning. Besides, the
findings can reinforce an essential role that parents have in motivating students to learn
(Mali, 2015b).
In light of the findings, building regular communication with students’ parents is
essential during a student’s learning process. In that case, teachers can tell the parents
about the learning problems possessed by their sons or daughters, and work together with
them to solve the problems. Building such communication can conceivably involve the
parents to participate and communicate actively in encouraging their sons, or daughters,
to do their best during their learning process.
Conclusion
To sum up, negative environment, time management, and negative habits are the
students’ attributions for the failure in their EFL learning process. Conversely, strategies
and family support are the students’ primary attributions for the success in their learning
process. These results may be a demonstration that in the Indonesian context, external
influences can primarily affect the students’ failure and success in their EFL learning.
These interconnections also appear to prove that classroom teachers cannot completely be
the one who handles the particular outcomes of their students’ EFL learning. It is
essential to have a constructive collaboration among teachers, students, parents, and
people outside the classrooms during the students EFL learning process. This
collaboration is expected to provide students with more opportunities to receive more
inputs for their EFL learning. As the constructive collaboration, the study would suggest
teachers to build a good rapport with their students. Possibly, it is done by always
providing students with positive encouragement that they can finish their study
successfully. Besides, teachers can regularly ask their students to tell the progress of their
study and their learning problems. Then, they can start to encourage their students to meet
and to consult different people who can help them and provide more inputs to solve the
problems. It can be done, for instance, by joining a certain academic community in which
they can share their learning problems and obtain solutions from members of the
community. The students can also meet people, who can be other teachers, professionals
with their expertise, to whom they can share the problems that they are encountering. By
doing so, teachers are expected to take a part in monitoring their students’ learning
process, to have a better understanding of possible factors causing the failures in the
students’ learning, and to take a role in minimizing the factors. Eventually, it is hoped
that the teachers can help their students to achieve their goal in their EFL learning.
References
Alwasilah, A.C. (2013, March 02). Designing education for modernity. The Jakarta Post.
Retrieved December 7, 2014, from
http://www.thejakartapost.com/news/2013/03/02/designing-educationmodernity.html.
Ary, D., Jacobs, L.C., & Sorensen, C. (2010). Introduction to research in education.
Belmont: Wadsworth, Cengage Learning.
Brown, H.D. (2007). Principles of language learning and teaching (5thed.). New York:
Pearson Education, Inc.
Dornyei, Z. (Eds.). (2001). Motivational strategies in the language classroom.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ellis, R. (2008). The study of second language acquisition (2nded.). Oxford: Oxford
University Press.
Farid, M.F., & Iqbal, H.M. (2012). Causal attribution beliefs among school students in
Pakistan. Interdisciplinary Journal of Contemporary Research in Business, 4(2),
pp.411-424.
Gall, M.D., Gall, J.P., Borg, W.R. (2007). Educational research: An introduction (8th
ed.). Boston: Pearson Education, Inc.
Gobel, P., & Mori, S. (2007). Success and failure in the EFL classroom: Exploring students’ attributional beliefs in language learning. In L. Roberts, A. Gürel, S. Tatar,
& L. Martı (Eds.), EUROSLA Yearbook 7 (pp. 149-169). Amsterdam: John
Benjamins Publishing Company.
Gonzales, A.S. (2011). Attribution theory and culture: using focus groups to uncover
parameters of influence. Language Studies Working Papers, 3, pp.29-37.
Harmer, J. (2007). The practice of English language teaching (4th ed.). Essex: Pearson
Education Limited.
Hatch, J.M. (2002). Doing qualitative research in education settings. New York: State
University of New York Press.
Lei, C. (2009). On the causal attribution of academic achievement in college Students.
Asian Social Science, 5(8), pp.87-96.
Mali, Y.C.G. (2015a). Students’ attributions on their English speaking enhancement.
Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics.4 (2), pp.32-43.
Mali, Y.C.G.(2015b). Motivational factors in the Indonesian EFL writing classroom.
Bahasa & Sastra , 15(2), pp.1-10.
Mori, S., Gobel, P., Thepsiri, K., & Pojanapunya, P. (2010) Attributions for performance:
A comparative study of Japanese and Thai University Students, JALT Journal.
32(1), pp.5-28.
Moustakas, C. (1994). Phenomenological research methods. London: Sage Publications.
Neuman, W.L. (2006). Social research methods qualitative and quantitative approaches
(6th ed.). Boston: Pearson.
Prentiss, T.M. (1995). An analysis of student lived and perceived experiences in high
school English. The Journal of Classroom Interaction, 30(2), pp.27-39.
Smith, M. K. (2012). What is pedagogy? The Encyclopedia of Informal Education.
Retrieved December 7, 2014, from http://infed.org/mobi/what-is-pedagogy.
Thang, S.W., Gobel, P., Mohd. Nor, N.F., & Suppiah, V.L. (2011). Students’ attributions
for success and failure in the learning of English as a second language: A
comparison of undergraduates from six public universities in Malaysia. Pertanika
J. Soc. Sci. & Hum, 19(2), pp.459-474.
Tse, L. (2000). Student perceptions of foreign language study: A qualitative analysis of
foreign language. The Modern Language Journal, (84)1, pp.69-84.
Weiner, B. (1972). Attributions theory, achievement motivation, and the educational
process. American Educational Research Association, 42(2), pp.203-215.
Williams, M., Burden, R.L., Poulet, G.M.A., & Maun, I.C. (2004). Learners’ perceptions
of their successes and failures in foreign language learning. Language Learning
Journal,30, pp.19-29.
Yilmaz, C. (2012). An investigation into Turkish EFL students’ attributions in reading
comprehension. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 3(5), pp.823-828.
Zohri, A. (2011). Causal attributions for failure and the effect of gender among Marocoan
EFL university learners. English Language Teaching Journal, 4 (4), pp.130-137.
Yustinus Calvin Gai Mali
Universitas Kristen Satya Wacana
E-mail: [email protected]
Abstract
This study explores students’ attributions for success and failure in their English
as a Foreign Language (EFL) learning process at English Language Education
Study Program, Satya Wacana Christian University (ED-SWCU). For data
collection, a semi-structured interview was conducted with three ED-SWCU
students. The results appear to prove that the students’ negative environment,
time management, and negative habits are the attributions for their failure, while
strategies and family support are the primary attributions for their success. In
essence, the results would seem to indicate that external influences primarily
take an essential role in the students’ failure and success in their learning
process. The interconnections possibly state that classroom teachers cannot
completely be the one who handles the particular outcomes of their students’
EFL learning. In light of the findings, this study proposes some pedagogical
ideas for the development of EFL teaching and learning particularly in
Indonesian Higher Education context.
Keywords: attributions, failure, success, EFL learning process
Introduction
Limiting our view of teaching and learning relationships primarily to the teacher’s
perspective provides only a partial view of classroom life and thus limited
understanding of teaching and learning processes in classroom. Attention must be
given to student experience if we are to more fully understand these relationships
and processes among teachers and students (Prentiss, 1995, p.27).
Teaching is not always a matter of transmitting knowledge to students (Harmer,
2007; Alwasilah, 2013) since they sometimes need to be listened and cared for
(Smith, 2012).
Ideas to conduct this study are from the researcher’s experience as a teacher. He
likes to come earlier to his classroom, spend some minutes to walk around the class, and
talk to his students more specifically to discuss their study. In that case, he usually asks
them about the progress of their study as well as whether they enjoy their learning
process, have questions to ask or need to share their academic problems.
One day, the researcher had an opportunity to talk to a student who was absent at
the first meeting of his class. The researcher started the conversation by asking his name
and reasons why he did not come to the class. The student introduced his name and
explained the reasons for his absences, which, in fact, led him to share stories dealing
with his learning process at the English Language Education Study Program, Faculty of
Language and Literature, Satya Wacana Christian University (ED-SWCU). In his stories,
the student told his experience when he failed in some courses that drastically lowered his
Grade Point Average (GPA). He also told his struggle to enhance his performance, so he
can presently pass the courses and successfully increase his GPA. Reflecting on the story,
the researcher starts to think about exploring further students’ attributions, an affective
factor in second language acquisition (Brown, 2007), on their English as a Foreign
Language (EFL), “situations where students were learning English to use it with any
other English speakers in the world” (Harmer, 2007, p.19), learning process.
Literature suggests some definitions of the term attribution. Dornyei (2001) defines
it as “an explanation people offer about why they were successful or, more importantly,
why they failed in the past” (p.118). It is also an explanation that learners provide for the
progress of their second language learning (Ellis, 2008) and reasons that they attribute to
their success or failure when they are in the process of learning a target language
(Gonzales, 2011). Based on ideas mentioned above, the study regards the attribution as
explanations and reasons that people provide for progress, achievement, and even failure
towards something they have experienced, particularly in their language learning.
It is well noted that the attribution can influence students’ learning motivation and
academic achievement. Weiner (1972) believes that the attribution process is an essential
determinant of learning and performance in a classroom. Lei (2009) asserts that
attribution made toward the success or failure in studying will result in changes in
expectations and emotions, which possibly affect motivation that individuals have for
learning and subsequently for their academic achievement. Weiner (1992) as cited in
Dornyei (2001, p.10) claims, “the individual explanations of why past successes and
failures have occurred have consequences on the person’s motivation to initiate future
action.” The theory proposes a framework that can help teachers in interpreting their
students’ claim such as “I cannot do this task.” After understanding its underlying factor,
the teachers may start to change the negative attitude.
In the field of education, some international studies have been conducted to explore
students’ attributions in the process of their English as a Second Language (ESL) and
EFL learning. The studies involved students from different educational levels. Some of
them are particularly secondary students (Williams, Burden, Poulet, & Maun, 2004; Farid
& Iqbal, 2012) and higher education students (Tse, 2000; Gobel & Mori; 2007; Mori,
Gobel, Thepsiri, & Pojanapunya, 2010; Zohri, 2011; Thang, Gobel, Mohd.Nor, &
Suppiah, 2011; Yilmaz, 2012; Mali, 2015a).
Tse (2000) conducted a qualitative study involving 51 University students who
learned a foreign language while they were studying in the United States. The study
revealed that the students’ attributions for the success in their learning were related to
external factors. They were their teachers and professors’ willingness to support their
learning, language inputs from their family, and community interactions. On the other
hand, most of the students believe that a low level of success in the study of their foreign
language was because of themselves. They admitted that they did not have enough
practice and not spend their time sufficiently to study the language.
In 2010, Mori, et al. sought to explore how EFL university students in Thailand
and Japan judged their successes and failures towards some language learning tasks. The
study would seem to indicate that the students regard their teacher’s influence and
classroom atmosphere as primary factors for their success. Conversely, the students
perceive a lack of ability and effort as the causes of their failures.
Zohri (2011) undertook a more recent study investigating Moroccoan university
students’ perceptions of failure. The study involved three hundred and thirty-three
subjects who studied English. The findings indicated that teachers’ attitude, effort/hard
work, interest, and pressure became the attributions for failure in their study.
In Pakistan, Farid and Iqbal (2012) conducted another related study. The results of
their study emphasized parents and teachers as a cause of success than failure for learning
outcomes. In a sense, this would be in harmony with ideas that people who are close to
students would greatly influence their attitudes to their language learning (Harmer, 2007).
Graham (1994) as cited in Dornyei (2001) also addresses ideas on typical
attributions on students’ successes and failures. He regards ability, effort, task difficulty,
and luck as the most common attributions in school environments. Other possible factors
deal with mood, family background, and help or hindrance from others.
Nevertheless, to the best of the researcher’s knowledge, there have been a limited
number of studies that sought to explore the issues possessed by undergraduates in the
Indonesian context, where English is considered as a foreign language. Thus, this study
aims to explore students’ attribution for their failure and successes in their EFL learning
process at the Study Program. With these in minds, the researcher aims to answer the
following research question: "What are students’ attributions for their failure and success
on their EFL learning process at ED-SWCU?”
Although the purpose of the present study might sound similar to that conducted by
the previous studies, the researcher still maintains that deeply exploring students’ real life
experience can be expected to contribute towards wider discussions of the attribution
studies. Besides, this study hopes to provide ED-SWCU teachers with insights related to
possible reasons for their students’ successes and failures in their language learning, so
they can develop a better understanding of helping their students avoid the failures, in
teaching all their students, and in helping them to achieve their successes in their
language learning.
Research Method
This research was designed qualitatively to explore students’ attributions for failure
and success on their EFL learning process at ED-SWCU. In particular, the research
employed a grounded theory approach. It aims to build a theory that faithfully reflects the
evidence or, in other words, to build a theory constructed from and grounded in the data
(Strauss & Corbin, 1990, as cited in Neuman, 2006). The approach also enables the
researcher to understand the nature and meaning of an experience for a particular group
of people in a particular setting (Glaser and Strauss, 1967, as cited in Moustakas, 1994,
p.4).” Though Gobel and Mori (2007) believe that using qualitative methods would seem
to follow the general trend in conducting an attribution research, the researcher has mixed
feelings about it. He still maintains that the methods can open up silent ideas possessed
by the research participants without being limited by one’s pre-understanding. The
methods are expected to result in richer findings related to the attribution issues within
the particular context.
Participants
The participants in this research were 3 ED-SWCU students; (2 males and 1
female). They are all the seventh-semester students who have spent two and half years
studying at the Study Program. The selection of the research participants was due to the
consideration that all of them have experienced the similar issues in their learning
process. The experience covers their failure in some courses at ED-SWCU and their
struggle to enhance their performance, so they can now pass the courses and successfully
increase their GPA. Besides, accessibility to meet them regularly in Second Language
Acquisition class, flexibility to conduct the research, and the participants’ willingness to
participate further in this research within a certain period were other essential factors for
selecting the participants. In this research, their names were kept in pseudonyms to keep
their confidentiality.
Materials
For the data collection, the researcher conducted a semi-structured interview, in
which an interviewer may ask a series of structured questions to his interviewees and
explore more deeply with open-form questions to obtain further information from them
(Gall, Gall, & Borg, 2007). In this research, the interviewees were asked to tell and
reconstruct their stories dealing with the attributions. The researcher conducted the
interview in Bahasa Indonesia to ensure that they could completely understand all
questions in the interview and, therefore, provide clear and deep responses.
Data collection
The interview section was conducted on three different occasions. They were on
October 31st, 2014 for interviewing the first participant, on November 7th, 2014 for
interviewing the second participant, and finally on November 12th, 2014 for interviewing
the third participant. The researcher started the interview by asking the participants to tell
their brief personal information. Then, they were asked to tell their experience of failure
and success in their learning process since the beginning of their study at ED-SWCU. In
this research, the term failure was defined as a situation when the students either got a bad
result or failed in a course. The term success, on the other hand, indicated that the
students could learn from mistakes making them fail the course, enhance their
performance, so they could successfully increase their GPA. The researcher recorded,
transcribed, and analyzed all the information from the interview to identify common
themes related to the issues. Within a week period after the interview session, the
researcher met each participant to show the interview transcription, let him/her read it and
add information towards his/her responses. It was done to ensure whether the participant
still needed to clarify his/her responses.
Data analysis
In this research, the researcher followed an inductive data analysis as adapted from
Hatch (2002); Ary et al. (2010). First, the researcher re-read repeatedly the interview
transcription, so he could break the data into some analyzable parts/ units. In that case, he
developed two general parts of analysis, namely attributions [1] for the students’ failure
and [2] for the students’ success. Second, he started to develop a set of categories of
meaning reflecting a cause-effect relation for each analyzable part. Third, he underlined
some responses that were in line with the issues and supported the discussions of the
emerging categories. That step was followed by reducing responses that were not salient
and related to the issues discussed in this research. Last, he searched for relationships
among the categories. These processes would eventually result in emerging themes about
the students’ attributions for their failures and successes in their EFL learning process at
ED-SWCU.
Findings and Discussion
The study aims to answer the research question; "What are students’ attributions
for their failure and success on their EFL learning process at ED-SWCU?" To answer the
question, the discussions in this part are divided into three sections namely [1] the
students’ learning process, [2] the students’ attributions for the failure and [3] the
students’ attributions for the success. The first section covers the summary of
participants’ experience extracted from the interview data (ITD) while the next two
sections clarify core themes extracted from the data presented in the first section. The
themes would become the answer to the research question.
The Students’ Learning Process
Doni’s story
His name is Doni. He was born in Salatiga twenty-six years ago. He has started to
learn English since he was in the first grade of Junior High School, meaning that he has
been studying English for more-less six years before entering ED-SWCU. The motivation
to study at the Study Program is the fact that he wants to become an English teacher. He
enjoyed his process studying English in his initial semesters. It was the first time for him
to be in classrooms whose communication during teaching and learning processes was
done in English. It was a new challenge for him. He was also happy because he could
meet new friends in his campus and practice his listening skills in a language laboratory,
the one he had not experienced in his schools.
Nevertheless, the situation was very different when he entered his fifth semester.
He admitted that he had socialized with his “wrong” friends. They were nice but,
unfortunately, liked to do negative things, which influenced his decision to join an
activity (Doni-FL-ITD-FRN). At first, he did not do the activity regularly until he, on one
occasion, gained many temporal benefits that soon made him do anything to keep him
involving in the activity.
The activity also made him stay awake at all night. With his sleepless nights, he
simply decided to join morning classes held at seven o’clock. As a result, he did not feel
fresh being in the classroom, so he could not follow the classroom discussions and
understand the points explained by his teacher (Doni-FL-ITD-PSC). Staying awake all
the night made him feel lazy to go to the campus. In that case, he did not deny that most
of his E scores, causing his failures, were because of his frequent absences in his
classroom. Besides, the bad score was due to his usual decision not to continue a course
when he knew that he obtained a bad result in his first progress test (Doni-FL-ITD-HBT).
The similar things had happened for five semesters. He could not control them.
Knowing the condition, Doni’s mother decided to visit him in Salatiga, finished all
his problems, and helped him to have a better life. She met the Chairperson of the Study
Program to discuss whether he could continue his study. He thought that it was all his
mother’s work that made him be a better person than what he was in the past (Doni-SCITD-FMY). The presence of his mother also significantly makes him stop doing the
activity. Moreover, he has started to consider his present age that is getting older and to
think that if his GPA remains low, it will be difficult for him to obtain a job (Doni-SCITD-SLR).
Dono’s story
Dono, a twenty-one-year-old student, was the second participant involved in this
study. He comes from Central Java. He has been learning English since he was in his
fourth grade of elementary school. He never thought that he would study English at the
Study Program since his passion was more on music. The fact that his brother is an
alumnus from the Study Program influenced his decision to study there. Besides, he soon
realized that he could work in many different places with his Bachelor of Education
Degree. At the beginning of his study, he just considered things he learned in classrooms
would only deal with how to be a teacher. It turned out to be wrong. In fact, he found out
that studying at the Study Program required him to learn some linguistics theories, such
as semantics, phonetics, and other related theories.
In his first semester, he felt so nervous specifically when he entered the Integrated
Course (IC) class consisting of eight credits. All students were expected to pass the class
and were only given a chance to repeat the class once. Being failed in the class twice
means that they would be recommended to quit their study from ED-SWCU.
Nevertheless, he could pass the class in his C score, regarded as a very minimum score
for the class. In that case, he mentioned that he frequently read IC books and asked his
brother questions about how he learned the materials, how to improve his grammatical
accuracy, and what to prepare for the test (Dono-SC-ITD-STR).
Though he passed the course, his overall score from his first semester to the fifth
semester got worse and was out of his expectation. For instance, he told that his GPA in
the fourth semester was only one. He admitted that such failure was because he liked to
postpone doing assignments that he did not like and to be absent in some of his classes,
such as Academic Writing and Academic Reading classes (Dono-FL-ITD-HBT). The
fourth and fifth semesters were obviously the worst semesters in his study.
His failure in the semesters meant a lot to him. It became a turning point for him to
enhance his performance in his upper semesters. He started to think that doing the same
things continuously would make him fail to finish his study. It would also disappoint his
parents who have worked very hard for his study. Therefore, he always comes to his
classes and does all his assignments with his very best efforts.
Further, he always remembers what his mother did to him when he experienced
such failure in the semesters. He was amazed at his mother who was not angry after she
knew the situation faced by her son. She always encourages and reminds him to study
harder and more diligently (Dono-SC-ITD-FMY). That makes him ask himself why his
mother can be so patient with him. He has promised to himself that he has to do his very
best in his study and be able to graduate in year two thousand and sixteen.
Dini’s story
Her name is Dini. She is a twenty-year-old student coming from Salatiga, Central
Java. She has been learning English since she was in her fourth grade of Elementary
School. She is interested in studying at ED-SWCU because she wants to continue what
she learned in her language class in Senior High School.
She felt anxious entering her classroom at the beginning of her study. She
remembered her experience in her Extensive Reading class, which was held at seven
o’clock in the morning and taught by a native speaker teacher who could not speak
Bahasa Indonesia at all. She was nervous whenever the teacher asked her questions in
English as she could not respond it using the same language. She was also afraid of
making mistakes. Therefore, she frequently kept silent during the class. Besides feeling
anxious, she admitted that the result of her study in the first semester was out of her
expectation. She could not manage her time well, so she did not have enough time to
study. She told that she had to teach her private students and use the money she obtained
to pay her first semester’s fee (Dini-FL-ITD-ATY).
She could enhance her performance in the second semester. She met her mentor,
whom she had more time to practice her English with (Dini-SC-ITD-MNR). Besides, the
mentor was her source of inspiration advising that she should positively consider her
failure as her encouragement to do better in her future. Her decision to live in a rented
house also helped her to enhance her performance. There, she could meet students,
coming from outside Java, with whom she could share her academic problems and
encourage one another (Dini-SC-ITD-FRN).
In her subsequent semester, she valued her being able to enhance her writing skill,
specifically dealing with her grammar accuracy in her writing. She notes that she can
learn more about grammar when she teaches it to other people (Dini-SC-ITD-STR). It is
not when she learns it from her teacher or listens to the teacher’s explanation in the
classroom.
In her fifth semester, she had to a join an activity, assigned by her scholarship
sponsor. The activity assigned her to hold an event working and involving many people
coming from different universities and faculties in Indonesia. The event was even bigger
that the annual drama performance held by the Study Program (Dini-SC-ITD-ATY). As a
result, she found it difficult to handle all the things and her academic matters at the same
time. She just felt that she only had limited time to study and finish all her classrooms’
assignments, so she could not do her best to finish them.
The Students’ Attributions for the Failure
Dealing with the attributions to the students’ failure, the study extracts some
possible themes from the text description. The first theme is a negative environment.
Making a relation with friends who have negative behavior causes problems to Doni’s
study. They successfully involve him in the activity that makes him have his sleepless
days. As a result, he cannot attend his morning classes and finish all his assignments.
Such condition is the reason for his frequent classroom absences that make him fail in a
class. This experience appears to become corroboration towards the view that people who
are close to students would greatly influence their attitudes to their language learning
(Harmer, 2007). It also might be a clarification that hindrance from others was as typical
attributions on students’ failure (Graham, 1994, as cited in Dornyei, 2001). Time
management and negative habits are other themes extracted from the text. It shows that
the students find it difficult to manage their time when they specifically have to deal with
their overloaded activities. They do not have a sufficient time to finish their classroom
assignments.
The Students’ Attributions for the Success
Williams, et al. (2004) state that to differentiate between effort and strategy is not
easy to do. Therefore, this study regards the term strategy operationally as a directed
effort. Interestingly, teaching learning materials to other people is revealed as a strategy
that can help Dini to enhance her grammar. In other words, she can learn grammar better
when she teaches it to other people. Spending time to read books and asking questions to
one’s brother and mentor are other helpful strategies that help Dono and Dini during their
learning process. In a sense, this would endorse Tse’s (2000) findings that language input
from students’ family and community interactions became their attributions for the
success in their learning. The findings conceivably prove that inputs that students obtain
outside their classrooms help them to learn the language.
It is also obvious that students need to keep developing a proper learning strategy
for their EFL learning. Within a classroom, teachers can invite students to share their
experience of learning strategies that they usually do in enhancing their English skills. It
is also possible for teachers to share their experience of their failure and success when
they were still students and practical ways to be successful language learners.
Family support is also invaluable for Doni and Dono. Specifically, the study
reveals the fact that a mother takes an essential role in the progress of their study. She is
the one who encourages Dono to study more diligently. This condition successfully
makes Dono promise to himself that he has to finish his study soon. She is also a person
who cares about Doni’s difficult situation. She helps him to solve all his problems. In a
sense, the findings are in harmony with Harmer’s (2007) view that people who are close
to students would greatly influence their attitudes to their language learning. Besides, the
findings can reinforce an essential role that parents have in motivating students to learn
(Mali, 2015b).
In light of the findings, building regular communication with students’ parents is
essential during a student’s learning process. In that case, teachers can tell the parents
about the learning problems possessed by their sons or daughters, and work together with
them to solve the problems. Building such communication can conceivably involve the
parents to participate and communicate actively in encouraging their sons, or daughters,
to do their best during their learning process.
Conclusion
To sum up, negative environment, time management, and negative habits are the
students’ attributions for the failure in their EFL learning process. Conversely, strategies
and family support are the students’ primary attributions for the success in their learning
process. These results may be a demonstration that in the Indonesian context, external
influences can primarily affect the students’ failure and success in their EFL learning.
These interconnections also appear to prove that classroom teachers cannot completely be
the one who handles the particular outcomes of their students’ EFL learning. It is
essential to have a constructive collaboration among teachers, students, parents, and
people outside the classrooms during the students EFL learning process. This
collaboration is expected to provide students with more opportunities to receive more
inputs for their EFL learning. As the constructive collaboration, the study would suggest
teachers to build a good rapport with their students. Possibly, it is done by always
providing students with positive encouragement that they can finish their study
successfully. Besides, teachers can regularly ask their students to tell the progress of their
study and their learning problems. Then, they can start to encourage their students to meet
and to consult different people who can help them and provide more inputs to solve the
problems. It can be done, for instance, by joining a certain academic community in which
they can share their learning problems and obtain solutions from members of the
community. The students can also meet people, who can be other teachers, professionals
with their expertise, to whom they can share the problems that they are encountering. By
doing so, teachers are expected to take a part in monitoring their students’ learning
process, to have a better understanding of possible factors causing the failures in the
students’ learning, and to take a role in minimizing the factors. Eventually, it is hoped
that the teachers can help their students to achieve their goal in their EFL learning.
References
Alwasilah, A.C. (2013, March 02). Designing education for modernity. The Jakarta Post.
Retrieved December 7, 2014, from
http://www.thejakartapost.com/news/2013/03/02/designing-educationmodernity.html.
Ary, D., Jacobs, L.C., & Sorensen, C. (2010). Introduction to research in education.
Belmont: Wadsworth, Cengage Learning.
Brown, H.D. (2007). Principles of language learning and teaching (5thed.). New York:
Pearson Education, Inc.
Dornyei, Z. (Eds.). (2001). Motivational strategies in the language classroom.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ellis, R. (2008). The study of second language acquisition (2nded.). Oxford: Oxford
University Press.
Farid, M.F., & Iqbal, H.M. (2012). Causal attribution beliefs among school students in
Pakistan. Interdisciplinary Journal of Contemporary Research in Business, 4(2),
pp.411-424.
Gall, M.D., Gall, J.P., Borg, W.R. (2007). Educational research: An introduction (8th
ed.). Boston: Pearson Education, Inc.
Gobel, P., & Mori, S. (2007). Success and failure in the EFL classroom: Exploring students’ attributional beliefs in language learning. In L. Roberts, A. Gürel, S. Tatar,
& L. Martı (Eds.), EUROSLA Yearbook 7 (pp. 149-169). Amsterdam: John
Benjamins Publishing Company.
Gonzales, A.S. (2011). Attribution theory and culture: using focus groups to uncover
parameters of influence. Language Studies Working Papers, 3, pp.29-37.
Harmer, J. (2007). The practice of English language teaching (4th ed.). Essex: Pearson
Education Limited.
Hatch, J.M. (2002). Doing qualitative research in education settings. New York: State
University of New York Press.
Lei, C. (2009). On the causal attribution of academic achievement in college Students.
Asian Social Science, 5(8), pp.87-96.
Mali, Y.C.G. (2015a). Students’ attributions on their English speaking enhancement.
Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics.4 (2), pp.32-43.
Mali, Y.C.G.(2015b). Motivational factors in the Indonesian EFL writing classroom.
Bahasa & Sastra , 15(2), pp.1-10.
Mori, S., Gobel, P., Thepsiri, K., & Pojanapunya, P. (2010) Attributions for performance:
A comparative study of Japanese and Thai University Students, JALT Journal.
32(1), pp.5-28.
Moustakas, C. (1994). Phenomenological research methods. London: Sage Publications.
Neuman, W.L. (2006). Social research methods qualitative and quantitative approaches
(6th ed.). Boston: Pearson.
Prentiss, T.M. (1995). An analysis of student lived and perceived experiences in high
school English. The Journal of Classroom Interaction, 30(2), pp.27-39.
Smith, M. K. (2012). What is pedagogy? The Encyclopedia of Informal Education.
Retrieved December 7, 2014, from http://infed.org/mobi/what-is-pedagogy.
Thang, S.W., Gobel, P., Mohd. Nor, N.F., & Suppiah, V.L. (2011). Students’ attributions
for success and failure in the learning of English as a second language: A
comparison of undergraduates from six public universities in Malaysia. Pertanika
J. Soc. Sci. & Hum, 19(2), pp.459-474.
Tse, L. (2000). Student perceptions of foreign language study: A qualitative analysis of
foreign language. The Modern Language Journal, (84)1, pp.69-84.
Weiner, B. (1972). Attributions theory, achievement motivation, and the educational
process. American Educational Research Association, 42(2), pp.203-215.
Williams, M., Burden, R.L., Poulet, G.M.A., & Maun, I.C. (2004). Learners’ perceptions
of their successes and failures in foreign language learning. Language Learning
Journal,30, pp.19-29.
Yilmaz, C. (2012). An investigation into Turkish EFL students’ attributions in reading
comprehension. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 3(5), pp.823-828.
Zohri, A. (2011). Causal attributions for failure and the effect of gender among Marocoan
EFL university learners. English Language Teaching Journal, 4 (4), pp.130-137.