POWER OF FRIENDSHIP BETWEEN KING GEORGE VI AND LIONEL LOGUE IN THE KING SPEECH MOVIE (2010) Power Of Friendship Between King George Vi And Lionel Logue In The King Speech Movie (2010) Directed By Tom Hooper: An Individual Psychological Approach.
POWER OF FRIENDSHIP BETWEEN KING GEORGE VI
AND LIONEL LOGUE IN THE KING SPEECH MOVIE (2010)
DIRECTED BY TOM HOOPER:
AN INDIVIDUAL PSYCHOLOGICAL APPROACH
RESEARCH PAPER
Submitted as a Partial Fulfillment of the Requirement
for Getting Bachelor Degree of Education
in English Department
Written by:
CORRY AINA
A 320080340
SCHOOL OF TEACHER TRAINING AND EDUCATION
MUHAMMADIYAH UNIVERSITY OF SURAKARTA
2014
MOTTO
Iqra’
Al baqarah ayat 1
v
DEDICATION
This research paper is dedicated to:
Allah SWT,
Thanks a lot for giving me ease and everything.
My beloved Parents, Thank you so much for loves, cares,
prayers and times for me.
My beloved brothers,
Thanks for every help and inspiration for me.
Thanks for Heru Sutimbul, and all my friends always
support me
vi
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
Assalamuala’ikum Wr. Wb.
Alhamdulillahirobbil’alamin, this is the first word that the researcher said as
all her praises are dedicated to ALLAH SWT due to his merciful and grateful.
Therefore, The researcher can accomplish her research paper entitled “POWER OF
FRIENDSHIP BETWEEN KING GEORGE VI AND LIONEL LOGUE IN THE
KING SPEECH MOVIE (2010) DIRECTED BY TOM HOOPER : INDIVIDUAL
PSYCHOLOGICAL APPROACH” as Partial Fulfillment of the Requirement for
Bachelor Degree in English Department, School of Teacher Training and Education,
Muhammadiyah University of Surakarta.
The researcher realizes that her research paper is still far from being perfect
because of her limited knowledge and experience. Therefore, the researcher will
accept all suggestions and critics to improve and evolve this research. She also
realizes that this research paper is impossible to complete without the help of others.
Thus, the researcher would like to express her gratitude and appreciate for all who
have contributed for the completing of this research paper. She is deeply gratitude to:
1. Prof. Dr. Harun Joko Prayitno, the Dean of the School of Teacher Training and
Education of Muhammadiyah University of Surakarta.
vii
2. Dr. Phil. Dewi Candraningrum, S.Pd, M.Ed., as the first consultant who patiently
guided her to accomplish her research paper from the start. Thanks a lot, mam.
3. Titis Setyabudi, S. S. M. Hum., as the second consultant and the head of English
Department for his honesty, kindness, and correction for the researcher.
4. All lecturers of English Department in Muhammadiyah University of Surakarta.
5. Her beloved parents, H.Saifuddin Aly and Hj. Nur Rofi’ah, for their unlimited
love, time, support and prayer for the researcher.
6. Her beloved brother, for support, motivate and help to finish this research paper.
7. The big family of English Department, for their inspiration and togetherness.
8. Her friends in “Wisma Flamboyan” boarding house for their inspiration, advice,
togetherness and happiness. And her other friends who cannot be listed one by
one
9.
And to all of people who have contributed to make this paper accomplish.
Wassalamualai’kum Wr. Wb.
Surakarta, 8 April 2014
The researcher
Corry Aina
viii
TABLE OF CONTENT
TITLE
........................................................................................................
i
APPROVAL ..................................................................................................
ii
ACCEPTANCE .............................................................................................
iii
TESTIMONY .................................................................................................
iv
MOTTO ........................................................................................................
v
DEDICATION ..............................................................................................
vi
ACKNOWLEDGMENT ..............................................................................
vii
TABLE OF CONTENT ................................................................................
ix
SUMMARY ...................................................................................................
xii
CHAPTER I :
CHAPTER II :
INTRODUCTION ...........................................................
1
1. Background of the Study ............................................
1
2. Literature Review ........................................................
7
3. Problem Statement .....................................................
8
4. Limitation of the Study ...............................................
9
5. Objectives of the Study ..............................................
9
6. Benefits of the Study ..................................................
9
7. Research Method .........................................................
10
8. Research Paper Organization ......................................
12
UNDERLYING THEORY ............................................
13
A. Individual Psychology ................................................
13
B. Basic Concept .............................................................
14
ix
1. Fictional Finalism ..................................................
14
2. Striving for Superiority .........................................
14
3. Inferiority Feeling and Compensation ..................
15
4. Style of Life ...........................................................
16
5. Social Interest ........................................................
18
6. Creative Self ..........................................................
19
C. Power ..........................................................................
20
D. Typology of Power .....................................................
21
E. Friendship ...................................................................
23
F. Typology of Friendship ..............................................
25
G. Structural Elements of the Movie ...............................
26
1. Narrative Elements ................................................
26
2. Technical Elements ...............................................
29
H. Theoretical Application ..............................................
35
CHAPTER III : STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS OF THE MOVIE ............
36
A. Structural Analysis of King Speech Movie ..................
36
1. Narrative Elements .................................................
36
2. Technical Elements ................................................
54
B. Discussion ...................................................................
65
CHAPTER IV : AN INDIVIDUAL PSYCHOLOGICAL ANALYSIS ...
69
A. Individual Psychological Analysis ..............................
69
1. Fictional Finalism ..................................................
69
2. Inferiority Feeling ..................................................
73
x
CHAPTER V :
3. Striving for Superiority ..........................................
76
4. Creative Power .......................................................
79
5. Style of Life ...........................................................
84
6. Social Interest ........................................................
87
B. The Power of Best Friend ............................................
88
C. Discussion ...................................................................
91
CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTION ...........................
95
A. Conclusion ...................................................................
95
B. Educational Implication ...............................................
96
C. Suggestion…………………………………………….
97
BIBLIOGRAPHY
xi
SUMMARY
CORRY AINA. A 320080340. “POWER OF FRIENDSHIP BETWEEN
KING GEORGE VI AND LIONEL LOGUE IN THE KING SPEECH
MOVIE (2010) DIRECTED BY TOM HOOPER: INDIVIDUAL
PSYCHOLOGICAL APPROACH”. MUHAMMADIYAH UNIVERSITY
OF SURAKARTA. 2014.
The major issue of this study is; to know the power of best friends between
King George VI and Lionel Logue in The King’s Speech? The objective of this
study is to analyze the structural elements of the movie The King’s Speech and
analyzing The King’s Speech movie based on the psychological approach.
The research is qualitative study. The researcher uses two data sources:
primary data source and secondary data source. The primary data source is The
King’s Speech movie directed by Tom Hooper and script movie written by David
Seidler. The secondary data sources are the data that support the analysis. The
data analysis method is descriptive qualitative analysis based on individual
psychological approach.
The results of the study show; the structural analysis of The King’s George
IV and Lionel Logue is connected to each other. The setting of this movie is in
Wembley and Buckingham Palace. The director showed the trust appears in every
people without seeing gender and status. Based on individual psychological
approach, the striving for superiority of the king and Lionel appears where the
power of the king to become a good father, he tries to get involved in every
activity in the house, especially when he tries to tell the story for his daughters.
The inferiority feeling on this movie appears starts from the King George, where
at the first time he must do the speech in front of the people of England. The
fictional finalism of Lionel who wants to become an artist. The fictional finalism
of King George where he is the grope king who really wants to recover. The
creative power of Lionel to help the king appears related with the simple sentence
‘I am a thistle sifter. I have a sieve of sifted thistles and a sieve of unsifted
thistles’. The style of life of the movie is the social useful types belong to Lionel
and ruling type belongs to the King. The social useful types be seen on every
Lionel activity on helping people to recover from the speech sickness.
Keywords : Individual psychological, The King’s Speech movie, The Power of
Best friendship.
First Consultant
Second Consultant
Dr. Phil. Dewi Candraningrum, S.Pd, M.Ed..
NIK. 772
xii
Titis Setyabudi. SS.M.Hum.
NIK. 948
AND LIONEL LOGUE IN THE KING SPEECH MOVIE (2010)
DIRECTED BY TOM HOOPER:
AN INDIVIDUAL PSYCHOLOGICAL APPROACH
RESEARCH PAPER
Submitted as a Partial Fulfillment of the Requirement
for Getting Bachelor Degree of Education
in English Department
Written by:
CORRY AINA
A 320080340
SCHOOL OF TEACHER TRAINING AND EDUCATION
MUHAMMADIYAH UNIVERSITY OF SURAKARTA
2014
MOTTO
Iqra’
Al baqarah ayat 1
v
DEDICATION
This research paper is dedicated to:
Allah SWT,
Thanks a lot for giving me ease and everything.
My beloved Parents, Thank you so much for loves, cares,
prayers and times for me.
My beloved brothers,
Thanks for every help and inspiration for me.
Thanks for Heru Sutimbul, and all my friends always
support me
vi
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
Assalamuala’ikum Wr. Wb.
Alhamdulillahirobbil’alamin, this is the first word that the researcher said as
all her praises are dedicated to ALLAH SWT due to his merciful and grateful.
Therefore, The researcher can accomplish her research paper entitled “POWER OF
FRIENDSHIP BETWEEN KING GEORGE VI AND LIONEL LOGUE IN THE
KING SPEECH MOVIE (2010) DIRECTED BY TOM HOOPER : INDIVIDUAL
PSYCHOLOGICAL APPROACH” as Partial Fulfillment of the Requirement for
Bachelor Degree in English Department, School of Teacher Training and Education,
Muhammadiyah University of Surakarta.
The researcher realizes that her research paper is still far from being perfect
because of her limited knowledge and experience. Therefore, the researcher will
accept all suggestions and critics to improve and evolve this research. She also
realizes that this research paper is impossible to complete without the help of others.
Thus, the researcher would like to express her gratitude and appreciate for all who
have contributed for the completing of this research paper. She is deeply gratitude to:
1. Prof. Dr. Harun Joko Prayitno, the Dean of the School of Teacher Training and
Education of Muhammadiyah University of Surakarta.
vii
2. Dr. Phil. Dewi Candraningrum, S.Pd, M.Ed., as the first consultant who patiently
guided her to accomplish her research paper from the start. Thanks a lot, mam.
3. Titis Setyabudi, S. S. M. Hum., as the second consultant and the head of English
Department for his honesty, kindness, and correction for the researcher.
4. All lecturers of English Department in Muhammadiyah University of Surakarta.
5. Her beloved parents, H.Saifuddin Aly and Hj. Nur Rofi’ah, for their unlimited
love, time, support and prayer for the researcher.
6. Her beloved brother, for support, motivate and help to finish this research paper.
7. The big family of English Department, for their inspiration and togetherness.
8. Her friends in “Wisma Flamboyan” boarding house for their inspiration, advice,
togetherness and happiness. And her other friends who cannot be listed one by
one
9.
And to all of people who have contributed to make this paper accomplish.
Wassalamualai’kum Wr. Wb.
Surakarta, 8 April 2014
The researcher
Corry Aina
viii
TABLE OF CONTENT
TITLE
........................................................................................................
i
APPROVAL ..................................................................................................
ii
ACCEPTANCE .............................................................................................
iii
TESTIMONY .................................................................................................
iv
MOTTO ........................................................................................................
v
DEDICATION ..............................................................................................
vi
ACKNOWLEDGMENT ..............................................................................
vii
TABLE OF CONTENT ................................................................................
ix
SUMMARY ...................................................................................................
xii
CHAPTER I :
CHAPTER II :
INTRODUCTION ...........................................................
1
1. Background of the Study ............................................
1
2. Literature Review ........................................................
7
3. Problem Statement .....................................................
8
4. Limitation of the Study ...............................................
9
5. Objectives of the Study ..............................................
9
6. Benefits of the Study ..................................................
9
7. Research Method .........................................................
10
8. Research Paper Organization ......................................
12
UNDERLYING THEORY ............................................
13
A. Individual Psychology ................................................
13
B. Basic Concept .............................................................
14
ix
1. Fictional Finalism ..................................................
14
2. Striving for Superiority .........................................
14
3. Inferiority Feeling and Compensation ..................
15
4. Style of Life ...........................................................
16
5. Social Interest ........................................................
18
6. Creative Self ..........................................................
19
C. Power ..........................................................................
20
D. Typology of Power .....................................................
21
E. Friendship ...................................................................
23
F. Typology of Friendship ..............................................
25
G. Structural Elements of the Movie ...............................
26
1. Narrative Elements ................................................
26
2. Technical Elements ...............................................
29
H. Theoretical Application ..............................................
35
CHAPTER III : STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS OF THE MOVIE ............
36
A. Structural Analysis of King Speech Movie ..................
36
1. Narrative Elements .................................................
36
2. Technical Elements ................................................
54
B. Discussion ...................................................................
65
CHAPTER IV : AN INDIVIDUAL PSYCHOLOGICAL ANALYSIS ...
69
A. Individual Psychological Analysis ..............................
69
1. Fictional Finalism ..................................................
69
2. Inferiority Feeling ..................................................
73
x
CHAPTER V :
3. Striving for Superiority ..........................................
76
4. Creative Power .......................................................
79
5. Style of Life ...........................................................
84
6. Social Interest ........................................................
87
B. The Power of Best Friend ............................................
88
C. Discussion ...................................................................
91
CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTION ...........................
95
A. Conclusion ...................................................................
95
B. Educational Implication ...............................................
96
C. Suggestion…………………………………………….
97
BIBLIOGRAPHY
xi
SUMMARY
CORRY AINA. A 320080340. “POWER OF FRIENDSHIP BETWEEN
KING GEORGE VI AND LIONEL LOGUE IN THE KING SPEECH
MOVIE (2010) DIRECTED BY TOM HOOPER: INDIVIDUAL
PSYCHOLOGICAL APPROACH”. MUHAMMADIYAH UNIVERSITY
OF SURAKARTA. 2014.
The major issue of this study is; to know the power of best friends between
King George VI and Lionel Logue in The King’s Speech? The objective of this
study is to analyze the structural elements of the movie The King’s Speech and
analyzing The King’s Speech movie based on the psychological approach.
The research is qualitative study. The researcher uses two data sources:
primary data source and secondary data source. The primary data source is The
King’s Speech movie directed by Tom Hooper and script movie written by David
Seidler. The secondary data sources are the data that support the analysis. The
data analysis method is descriptive qualitative analysis based on individual
psychological approach.
The results of the study show; the structural analysis of The King’s George
IV and Lionel Logue is connected to each other. The setting of this movie is in
Wembley and Buckingham Palace. The director showed the trust appears in every
people without seeing gender and status. Based on individual psychological
approach, the striving for superiority of the king and Lionel appears where the
power of the king to become a good father, he tries to get involved in every
activity in the house, especially when he tries to tell the story for his daughters.
The inferiority feeling on this movie appears starts from the King George, where
at the first time he must do the speech in front of the people of England. The
fictional finalism of Lionel who wants to become an artist. The fictional finalism
of King George where he is the grope king who really wants to recover. The
creative power of Lionel to help the king appears related with the simple sentence
‘I am a thistle sifter. I have a sieve of sifted thistles and a sieve of unsifted
thistles’. The style of life of the movie is the social useful types belong to Lionel
and ruling type belongs to the King. The social useful types be seen on every
Lionel activity on helping people to recover from the speech sickness.
Keywords : Individual psychological, The King’s Speech movie, The Power of
Best friendship.
First Consultant
Second Consultant
Dr. Phil. Dewi Candraningrum, S.Pd, M.Ed..
NIK. 772
xii
Titis Setyabudi. SS.M.Hum.
NIK. 948