S FIS 0902056 Bibliography
DAFTAR PUSTAKA
Acar, O., Patton, B.R. (2012). Argumentation and formal reasoning skills
in an argumentation based guided inquiry course. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences 46 ( 2012 ) 4756 – 4760.
Arikunto, S. (2010). Prosedur Penelitian: Suatu Pendekatan Praktik.
Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Arikunto, S. (2013). Prosedur Penelitian: Suatu Pendekatan Praktik.
Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Beck, U. (1992). Risk society: towards a new modernity. London: Sage.
Departemen Pendidikan Nasional (2006). Kurikulum 2006 Mata Pelajaran
IPA SMA/MA. Jakarta: depdiknas.
Driver et all. (2000). Establishing the Norms of Scientific Argumentation
in Classroom. Science Education, 85 (3), 287-312
Erduran, Sibel. (2007). Methodological Foundations in the Study of
Argumentation in Science Classrooms. STOA,3.
Erduran, S., & Jimenez-Aleixandre, M.P. (2008). Argumenation in Science
Education. Florida State University-USA: Spinger.
Firdaus,
M.R. (2012). Hakikat Sains. [Online]. Tersedia di:
http://www.mrifqifirdauspgsdipa.blogspot.com/2012/09/hakikatsains.html?m=1. Diakses 11 September 2014
Gardner, H. (1999). The dicipline mind: What all students should
understand. New York: Simon & Schuster Inc.
Giddens, A. (1999) The Reith Lectures: Risk. London: BBC.
Grooms, J.A. (2011). Using argument-driven inquiry to enhance students’
argument sophistication when supporting a stance in the context
of socioscientific issues. (Disertasi). The Florida State University
College Of Education.
Anggara Bayu Pratama, 2014
Penerapan Model Pembangkit Argumen D engan Metode Investigasi Sains Untuk Meningkatkan
Kemampuan Berargumentasi Siswa Pada Materi Kalor
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu |perpustakaan.upi.edu
67
Hake, R. R. (1998). Interactive Engagement Methods In Introductory
Mechanics
Courses.
[online]
Tersedia
:
http://www.physics.indiana.edu/~sdi/IEM-2b.pdf
[3 Maret
2014]
Kelly, G. J., & Bazerman, C. (2003). How Student Argue Scientific Claim:
A Rhetorical-Semantic Analysis. University of California:
Oxford University Press.
Kelly, G. J., & Takao, A. (2002). Epistemic levels in argumen: An
analysis of university oceanography students’ use of evidence in
writing. Science Education, 86, 314-342.
Kuhn, D. (1993). Science as argument: Implications for teaching and
learning scientific thinking. Science Education, 77(3), 319-337.
Kuhn, D. (2009). Teaching and Learning Science as Argument. Wiley
Online Library. 10(1002).
McNeill, K. L., Lizotte, D. J., & Krajcik, J. (2006). Supporting students’
construction of scientific explanations by fading scaffolds in
instructional materials. The Journal of the Learning Sciences,
15(2), 153-191.
Millar, R. and Osborne, J. F. ed. (1998). Beyond 2000: Science education
for the future. London: King’s College London.
Muslim. (2013). Penerapan Model Pembangkit Argumen Berbasis
Investigasi Sains Dalam Pembelajaran Fisika Untuk
Meningkatkan Kemampuan Argumentasi Siswa SMA. Laporan
Akhir Hibah Penelitian Dalam Rangka Implementasi Program
DIA bermutu BACH III. Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia: tidak
diterbitkan.
Norris, S., Philips, L. & Osborne, J. (2007). Scientific inquiry: the place of
interpretation and argumenation. In J. Luft, R. Bell & J. GessNewsome (Eds.), Science as Inquiry in the Secondary Setting.
Arlington, VA: NSTA Press
Osborne, J., Erduran, S., & Simon, S. (2001). Enhancing the quality of
argumenation in school science. Journal of Research in Science
Teaching, 82(301).
Anggara Bayu Pratama, 2014
Penerapan Model Pembangkit Argumen D engan Metode Investigasi Sains Untuk Meningkatkan
Kemampuan Berargumentasi Siswa Pada Materi Kalor
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu |perpustakaan.upi.edu
68
Osborne, J., Erduran, S., & Simon, S. (2004). Learning to teach
Argumentation: Research And development in the science
Classroom. Journal of Research in Science Teaching.
Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Nomor 54. (2013).
Standar Kompetensi Lulusan Pendidikan Dasar Dan Menengah.
Jakarta: Kementrian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik
Indonesia
Quinn, V. (1997). Critical thinking in young minds. London: David
Fulton.
Rachman, P. (2013). Hakikat IPA. [Online]. Tersedia
http://www.praditarachman.blogspot.com/2013/03/hakikatipa.html?m=1. Diakses 11 September 2014.
di:
Rutherford, F.J. & Ahlgren, A. (1990). Science for All Americans. New
York : Oxford University Press.
Sampson, V., Gerbino, F. (2010). Two Instructional Models That Teachers
Can Use to Promote & Support Scientific Argumenation in the
Biology Classroom The American Biology Teacher, 72(7), 427–
431.
Schen, M. S. (2007). Scientific reasoning skills development in the
introductory biology courses for undergraduates. (Disertasi). The
Ohio State University, Columbus.
Trend, R. (2009). Fostering Students’ Argumenation Skills in Geoscience
Education. Journal of Geoscience Education. 57(4), 224-232
Wenning, C. J. (2006). A pramework for teaching the nature of science.
Journal of Physics Teacher Education Online. 3(3), 3-10.
Available at: http://www . phy.ilstu. edu/ jpteo
Zohar, A., & Nemet, F. (2002). Fostering students’ knowledge and
argumenation skills through dilemmas in human genetics.
Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(1), 35-62.
Anggara Bayu Pratama, 2014
Penerapan Model Pembangkit Argumen D engan Metode Investigasi Sains Untuk Meningkatkan
Kemampuan Berargumentasi Siswa Pada Materi Kalor
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu |perpustakaan.upi.edu
Acar, O., Patton, B.R. (2012). Argumentation and formal reasoning skills
in an argumentation based guided inquiry course. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences 46 ( 2012 ) 4756 – 4760.
Arikunto, S. (2010). Prosedur Penelitian: Suatu Pendekatan Praktik.
Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Arikunto, S. (2013). Prosedur Penelitian: Suatu Pendekatan Praktik.
Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Beck, U. (1992). Risk society: towards a new modernity. London: Sage.
Departemen Pendidikan Nasional (2006). Kurikulum 2006 Mata Pelajaran
IPA SMA/MA. Jakarta: depdiknas.
Driver et all. (2000). Establishing the Norms of Scientific Argumentation
in Classroom. Science Education, 85 (3), 287-312
Erduran, Sibel. (2007). Methodological Foundations in the Study of
Argumentation in Science Classrooms. STOA,3.
Erduran, S., & Jimenez-Aleixandre, M.P. (2008). Argumenation in Science
Education. Florida State University-USA: Spinger.
Firdaus,
M.R. (2012). Hakikat Sains. [Online]. Tersedia di:
http://www.mrifqifirdauspgsdipa.blogspot.com/2012/09/hakikatsains.html?m=1. Diakses 11 September 2014
Gardner, H. (1999). The dicipline mind: What all students should
understand. New York: Simon & Schuster Inc.
Giddens, A. (1999) The Reith Lectures: Risk. London: BBC.
Grooms, J.A. (2011). Using argument-driven inquiry to enhance students’
argument sophistication when supporting a stance in the context
of socioscientific issues. (Disertasi). The Florida State University
College Of Education.
Anggara Bayu Pratama, 2014
Penerapan Model Pembangkit Argumen D engan Metode Investigasi Sains Untuk Meningkatkan
Kemampuan Berargumentasi Siswa Pada Materi Kalor
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu |perpustakaan.upi.edu
67
Hake, R. R. (1998). Interactive Engagement Methods In Introductory
Mechanics
Courses.
[online]
Tersedia
:
http://www.physics.indiana.edu/~sdi/IEM-2b.pdf
[3 Maret
2014]
Kelly, G. J., & Bazerman, C. (2003). How Student Argue Scientific Claim:
A Rhetorical-Semantic Analysis. University of California:
Oxford University Press.
Kelly, G. J., & Takao, A. (2002). Epistemic levels in argumen: An
analysis of university oceanography students’ use of evidence in
writing. Science Education, 86, 314-342.
Kuhn, D. (1993). Science as argument: Implications for teaching and
learning scientific thinking. Science Education, 77(3), 319-337.
Kuhn, D. (2009). Teaching and Learning Science as Argument. Wiley
Online Library. 10(1002).
McNeill, K. L., Lizotte, D. J., & Krajcik, J. (2006). Supporting students’
construction of scientific explanations by fading scaffolds in
instructional materials. The Journal of the Learning Sciences,
15(2), 153-191.
Millar, R. and Osborne, J. F. ed. (1998). Beyond 2000: Science education
for the future. London: King’s College London.
Muslim. (2013). Penerapan Model Pembangkit Argumen Berbasis
Investigasi Sains Dalam Pembelajaran Fisika Untuk
Meningkatkan Kemampuan Argumentasi Siswa SMA. Laporan
Akhir Hibah Penelitian Dalam Rangka Implementasi Program
DIA bermutu BACH III. Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia: tidak
diterbitkan.
Norris, S., Philips, L. & Osborne, J. (2007). Scientific inquiry: the place of
interpretation and argumenation. In J. Luft, R. Bell & J. GessNewsome (Eds.), Science as Inquiry in the Secondary Setting.
Arlington, VA: NSTA Press
Osborne, J., Erduran, S., & Simon, S. (2001). Enhancing the quality of
argumenation in school science. Journal of Research in Science
Teaching, 82(301).
Anggara Bayu Pratama, 2014
Penerapan Model Pembangkit Argumen D engan Metode Investigasi Sains Untuk Meningkatkan
Kemampuan Berargumentasi Siswa Pada Materi Kalor
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu |perpustakaan.upi.edu
68
Osborne, J., Erduran, S., & Simon, S. (2004). Learning to teach
Argumentation: Research And development in the science
Classroom. Journal of Research in Science Teaching.
Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Nomor 54. (2013).
Standar Kompetensi Lulusan Pendidikan Dasar Dan Menengah.
Jakarta: Kementrian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik
Indonesia
Quinn, V. (1997). Critical thinking in young minds. London: David
Fulton.
Rachman, P. (2013). Hakikat IPA. [Online]. Tersedia
http://www.praditarachman.blogspot.com/2013/03/hakikatipa.html?m=1. Diakses 11 September 2014.
di:
Rutherford, F.J. & Ahlgren, A. (1990). Science for All Americans. New
York : Oxford University Press.
Sampson, V., Gerbino, F. (2010). Two Instructional Models That Teachers
Can Use to Promote & Support Scientific Argumenation in the
Biology Classroom The American Biology Teacher, 72(7), 427–
431.
Schen, M. S. (2007). Scientific reasoning skills development in the
introductory biology courses for undergraduates. (Disertasi). The
Ohio State University, Columbus.
Trend, R. (2009). Fostering Students’ Argumenation Skills in Geoscience
Education. Journal of Geoscience Education. 57(4), 224-232
Wenning, C. J. (2006). A pramework for teaching the nature of science.
Journal of Physics Teacher Education Online. 3(3), 3-10.
Available at: http://www . phy.ilstu. edu/ jpteo
Zohar, A., & Nemet, F. (2002). Fostering students’ knowledge and
argumenation skills through dilemmas in human genetics.
Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(1), 35-62.
Anggara Bayu Pratama, 2014
Penerapan Model Pembangkit Argumen D engan Metode Investigasi Sains Untuk Meningkatkan
Kemampuan Berargumentasi Siswa Pada Materi Kalor
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu |perpustakaan.upi.edu