SarahFauzianisa 22010112130208 LapKTI Bab7

65

DAFTAR PUSTAKA

1.

Callagher M. 2015 Essential Facts About the Computer and Video Game
Industry. Soc Sci Comput Rev. 2015;4(1).

2.

Bavelier D, Achtman RL, Mani M, Föcker J. Neural bases of selective
attention in action video game players. Vision Res. 2012;61:132-43.

3.

Anguera JA, Boccanfuso J, Rintoul JL, Al-Hashimi O, Faraji F, Janowich J,
et al. Video game training enhances cognitive control in older adults. Nature.
2013;501(7465):97-101.

4.


Blacker KJ, Curby KM. Enhanced visual short-term memory in action video
game players. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2013;75(6):1128-36.

5.

Green CS, Bavelier D. Action video game modifies visual selective
attention. Nature. 2003;423(6939):534-7.

6.

Owen N, Healy GN, Matthews CE, Dunstan DW. Too much sitting: the
population health science of sedentary behavior. Exerc Sport Sci Rev.
2010;38(3):105-13.

7.

Hasan Y, Bègue L, Scharkow M, Bushman BJ. The more you play, the more
aggressive you become: A long-term experimental study of cumulative
violent video game effects on hostile expectations and aggressive behavior.

J Exp Soc Psychol. 2013;49(2):224-7.

8.

Wolf MJPW, Perron B. The Routledge Companion to Video Game Studies.
Routledge; 2014.

9.

Team NSN. Microsoft’s body-sensing, button-busting controller. Dikutip
dari
https://www.newscientist.com/article/mg20527426-800-microsoftsbody-sensing-button-busting-controller/. Terbit 2010. Diakses 1 Desember
2015.

10.

Witherspoon L. Exergaming. Journal of American College of Science
Medicine.

11.


Su H, Chang Y, Lin Y, Chu I. Effects of training using an active video game
on agility and balance - Minerva Medica - Journals. J Sports Med Phys
Fitness. 2015;9(55):14-21.

12.

Maloney AE, Bethea TC, Kelsey KS, Marks JT, Paez S, et al. A pilot of a
video game (DDR) to promote physical activity and decrease sedentary
screen time. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2008;16(9):2074-80.

13.

Sheehan DP, Katz L. The effects of a daily, 6-week exergaming curriculum
on balance in fourth grade children. J Sport Heal Sci. 2013;2(3):131-7.

65

66


14.

Mills A, Rosenberg M, Stratton G, Carter HH, Spence AL, Pugh CJ, et al.
The effect of exergaming on vascular function in children. J Pediatr.
2013;163(3):806-10.

15.

Kloos AD, Fritz NE, Kostyk SK, Young GS, Kegelmeyer DA. Video game
play (Dance Dance Revolution) as a potential exercise therapy in
Huntington’s disease: a controlled clinical trial. Clin Rehabil.
2013;27(11):972-82.

16.

Natbony LR, Zimmer A, Ivanco LS, Studenski SA, Jain S. Perceptions of a
Videogame-Based Dance Exercise Program Among Individuals with
Parkinson’s Disease. Games Health J. 2013;2(4):235-9.

17.


Pichierri G, Murer K, de Bruin ED. A cognitive-motor intervention using a
dance video game to enhance foot placement accuracy and gait under dual
task conditions in older adults: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Geriatr.
2012;12(1):74.

18.

Maddison R, Mhurchu CN, Jull A, Prapavessis H, Foley LS, Jiang Y. Active
video games: the mediating effect of aerobic fitness on body composition.
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2012;9:54.

19.

Richard A, Harper P, Simons R, Ogawa E. Guinness World Records
Gamer’s Edition β015. Vol 6. Guinness World Records; 2014.

20.

Sporis G, Jukic I, Milanovic L, Vucetic V. Reliability and Factorial

Validity of Agility Tests for Soccer Players. J Strength Cond Res.
2010;24(3):679-86.

21.

Maillot P, Perrot A, Hartley A. Effects of interactive physical-activity
video-game training on physical and cognitive function in older adults.
Psychol Aging. 2012;27(3):589-600.

22.

Rollings A, Adams E. Andrew Rollings and Ernest Adams on Game
Design.; 2003.

23.

Guggenheim JA, Pong-Wong R, Haley CS, Gazzard G, Saw SM.
Correlations in refractive errors between siblings in the Singapore Cohort
Study of Risk factors for Myopia. Br J Ophthalmol. 2007;91(6):781-4.


24.

Franceschini S, Gori S, Ruffino M, Viola S, Molten M, Facoetti A. Action
Video Games Make Dyslexic Children Read Better. Curr Biol.
2013;23(6):462-6.

25.

Li RW, Ngo C, Nguyen J, Levi DM. Video-game play induces plasticity in
the visual system of adults with amblyopia. PLoS Biol. 2011;9(8):e1001135.

26.

Goris J, Jalink MB, Ten Cate Hoedemaker HO. Training basic laparoscopic
skills using a custom-made video game. Perspect Med Educ. 2014;3(4):3148.

27.

Chen A. Effects of exergaming and the physical education curriculum. J


67

Sport Heal Sci. 2013;2(3):129-30.
28.

Anderson CA, Shibuya A, Ihori N, Swing EL, Bushman BJ, Sakamoto A, et
al. Violent video game effects on aggression, empathy, and prosocial
behavior in Eastern and Western countries: A meta-analytic review. Psychol
Bull. 2010;2(136):151-73.

29.

Kelly J. Taiwan teen dies after gaming for 40 hours. The Australian Press.
Dikutip dari http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/latest-news/taiwanteen-dies-after-gaming-for-40-hours/story-fn3dxix6-1226428437223.
Diterbitkan 2012. Diakses 7 Mei 2016.

30.

Simons M, Chinapaw MJ, Brug J, Seidell J, de Vet E. Associations between
active video gaming and other energy-balance related behaviours in

adolescents: a 24-hour recall diary study. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act.
2015;12(1):192.

31.

de Castell S, Jenson J, Thumlert K. From Simulation to Imitation:
Controllers, Corporeality, and Mimetic Play. Simul Gaming.
2014;45(3):332-55.

32.

Hoysniemi J. International survey on the Dance Dance Revolution game.
Theor Pract Comput Appl Entertain. 2006;4(2).

33.

Steinberg S. The top 10 music games of all time. CNN. Dikutip dari
http://edition.cnn.com/2011/09/26/tech/gaming-gadgets/top-10-musicgames-steinberg/. Diterbitkan 2011. Diakses 7 Mei 2016.

34.


Sun H. Impact of exergames on physical activity and motivation in
elementary school students: A follow-up study. J Sport Heal Sci.
2013;2(3):138-45.

35.

Hoysniemi J. International survey on the Dance Dance Revolution game.
Comput Entertain. 2006;4(2):8.

36.

Hoeger W, Hoeger S. Lifetime Physical Fitness and Wellness. Cengage
Learning; 2006.

37.

Young W, Farrow D. A Review of Agility: Practical Applications for
Strength and Conditioning. Strength Cond J. 2006;28(5):24.


38.

Sheppard, Jeremy M WBY. Agility Literature Review: Classifications,
Training and Testing. J Sports Sci. 2006;24(9).

39.

Galpin AJ, Li Y, Lohnes CA, Schilling BK. A 4-week choice foot speed and
choice reaction training program improves agility in previously non-agility
trained, but active men and women. J Strength Cond Res. 2008;22(6):19017.

40.

Tanner R, Gore C. Physiological Tests for Elite Athletes-2nd Edition.
Champaign:Human Kinetics; 2013.

68

41.

Hall JE, Guyton AC. Buku Ajar Fisiologi Kedokteran. Edisi Keduabelas.
Diterjemahkan oleh Ilyas EI. Singapura:Elsevier; 2014.

42.

Barrett KE, Barman SM, Boitano S, Brooks H. Ganong’s Review of Medical
Physiology, 24th Edition. New York:McGraw Hill Professional; 2012.

43.

Ropper AH, Samuels MA. Adams & Victor’s Principles of Neurology, 9th
Edition. New York:McGraw Hill Professional; 2009.

44.

Snell R. Clinical Neuroanatomy 7th Edition. Baltimore:Lippincott Williams
& Wilkins; 2014.

45.

Marieb E, Hoehn K. Human Anatomy & Physiology. New York:Pearson
Benjamin Cummings;2006.

46.

Raya M, Gailey RS, Gaunaurd IA, Jayne DM, Campbell SM, Gagne E, et al.
Comparison of three agility tests with male servicemembers: Edgren Side
Step Test, T-Test, and Illinois Agility Test. J Rehabil Res Dev.
2013;50(7):951-60.

47.

Beekhuizen KS, Davis MD, Kolber MJ, Cheng M-SS. Test-retest reliability
and minimal detectable change of the hexagon agility test. J Strength Cond
Res. 2009;23(7):2167-71.

48.

Green CS, Bavelier D. Action video game training for cognitive
enhancement. Curr Opin Behav Sci. 2015;4:103-8.

49.

Latash MM. Neurophysiological Basis of Movement 2nd Edition.
Champaign:Human Kinetics; 2008.

50.

Mancall EL, Brock DG. Gray’s Clinical Neuroanatomy: The Anatomical
Basis for Clinical Neuroscience. Elsevier Inc; 2011.

69

Lampiran 1. Ethical Clearance

70

Lampiran 2. Persetujuan Sesudah Penjelasan/Informed Consent
JUDUL PENELITIAN:
Pengaruh Bermain Video Game Kinetik Simulasi Tari
sebagai Exergame terhadap Kelincahan
INSTANSI PELAKSANA:
Bagian Fisiologi FK Undip Mahasiswa Program Studi Strata-1 Kedokteran
Umum Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Diponegoro

PERSETUJUAN SESUDAH PENJELASAN
(INFORMED CONSENT)

Yth, …………………………………..
Perkenalkan nama saya Sarah Fauzianisa. Saya adalah mahasiswi Program
Studi Strata-1 Kedokteran Umum Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Diponegoro.
Guna mendapatkan gelar Sarjana Kedokteran maka salah satu syarat yang
ditetapkan kepada saya adalah menyusun sebuah karya tulis ilmiah. Penelitian yang
akan saya lakukan berjudul “Pengaruh Bermain Video Game Kinetik Simulasi Tari
sebagai Exergame terhadap Kelincahan”.
Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk membuktikan manfaat bermain video
game kinetik simulasi tari terhadap kelincahan. Dalam penelitian ini saya akan
memberikan permainan video game kinetik simulasi tari yang akan dilakukan
dalam waktu 30 menit per sesi dalam 2 kali seminggu selama 8 minggu atau tidak
memberikan permainan video game kinetik simulasi tari dan melakukan
pengukuran kelincahan. Subjek diminta untuk tidak mengikuti program latihan fisik
lainnya selain permainan video game kinetik yang diberikan selama penelitian
karena akan mempengaruhi kelincahan yang merupakan variabel penelitian.

71

Penelitian ini diharapkan dapat bermanfaat dengan memberikan informasi
kepada masyarakat, memberi pengetahuan baru, dan menjadi acuan bagi penelitian
selanjutnya tentang bermain video game kinetik simulasi tari sebagai exergame
terhadap kelincahan.
Penelitian yang saya lakukan ini bersifat sukarela terhadap subjek dan tidak
ada unsur paksaan. Partisipasi Anda dalam penelitian ini juga tidak akan digunakan
dalam hal-hal yang merugikan Anda dalam bentuk apapun. Data yang didapatkan
dari penelitian ini akan dijamin kerahasiaannya, yaitu identitas subjek penelitian
tidak akan dicantumkan dan data tersebut hanya akan saya gunakan untuk
kepentingan penelitian, pendidikan, dan ilmu pengetahuan.
Penanggung jawab penelitian adalah:
Sarah Fauzianisa
Bagian Ilmu Fisiologi FK Undip
Jl. Prof. H. Soedarto, SH, Tembalang, Semarang
Telepon 024-76928010 ext 7771
HP. 083822333913

Sesudah mendengar dan memahami penjelasan penelitian, dengan ini saya
menyatakan

SETUJU / TIDAK SETUJU
untuk ikut sebagai subjek/sampel penelitian ini.
Semarang, …………………….β016
Saksi

:

Nama Terang :
Alamat
:

Nama Terang :
Alamat
:

72

Lampiran 3. Hasil analisis

Means
Report
Kelompok

Umur (tahun)
Mean

53.111

21.196

.667

.06616

4.7703

1.9868

21.00

1.6000

54.300

21.200

Minimum

20

1.50

47.4

17.9

Maximum

22

1.68

61.3

24.9

21.22

1.5967

53.867

21.078

.667

.05074

6.5846

1.7015

21.00

1.6000

52.000

20.630

Minimum

20

1.53

47.5

18.6

Maximum

22

1.67

65.5

24.1

21.22

1.5906

53.489

21.137

.647

.05755

5.5914

1.7954

21.00

1.6000

52.800

21.135

Minimum

20

1.50

47.4

17.9

Maximum

22

1.68

65.5

24.9

Median

Std. Deviation
Median

Mean
Std. Deviation
Total

IMT

1.5844

Mean

Kontrol

Berat Badan

21.22

Std. Deviation
Perlakuan

Tinggi badan

Median

Explore
Descriptives
Statistic
Mean

Std. Error

21.22
Lower Bound

20.90

Upper Bound

21.54

.152

95% Confidence Interval for Mean

Umur (tahun)

5% Trimmed Mean

21.25

Median

21.00

Variance

.418

Std. Deviation

.647

Minimum

20

Maximum

22

Range

2

Interquartile Range

1

Skewness

-.230

.536

Kurtosis

-.411

1.038

73

Mean
95% Confidence Interval for Mean

1.5906
Lower Bound

1.5619

Upper Bound

1.6192

5% Trimmed Mean

1.5906

Median

1.6000

Variance
Tinggi badan

.003

Std. Deviation

.05755

Minimum

1.50

Maximum

1.68

Range

.18

Interquartile Range

.11

Skewness

-.101

.536

Kurtosis

-1.148

1.038

Mean

53.489

1.3179

95% Confidence Interval for Mean

Berat Badan

.01356

Lower Bound

50.708

Upper Bound

56.269

5% Trimmed Mean

53.160

Median

52.800

Variance

31.263

Std. Deviation

5.5914

Minimum

47.4

Maximum

65.5

Range

18.1

Interquartile Range

7.5

Skewness

.944

.536

Kurtosis

.225

1.038

21.137

.4232

Mean
Lower Bound

20.244

Upper Bound

22.030

95% Confidence Interval for Mean
5% Trimmed Mean

21.110

Median

21.135

Variance

3.224

+IMT
Std. Deviation

1.7954

Minimum

17.9

Maximum

24.9

Range

7.0

Interquartile Range

1.9

Skewness

.303

.536

74

Kurtosis

.150

1.038

Tests of Normality
Kolmogorov-Smirnova
Statistic

df

Shapiro-Wilk
Sig.

Statistic

df

Sig.

Umur (tahun)

.301

18

.000

.786

18

.001

Tinggi badan

.127

18

.200*

.948

18

.398

Berat Badan

.147

18

.200*

.889

18

.037

IMT

.167

18

.198

.975

18

.888

*. This is a lower bound of the true significance.
a. Lilliefors Significance Correction

NPar Tests
Mann-Whitney Test
NPar Tests

Mann-Whitney Test

Ranks
Kelompok

Umur (tahun)

9.50

85.50

Kontrol

9

9.50

85.50

18

Perlakuan

9

9.06

81.50

Kontrol

9

9.94

89.50

18

Perlakuan

9

9.67

87.00

Kontrol

9

9.33

84.00

Total

IMT

Sum of Ranks

9

Total

Berat Badan

Mean Rank

Perlakuan

Total

Tinggi badan

N

18

Perlakuan

9

9.89

89.00

Kontrol

9

9.11

82.00

Total

18

75

Test Statisticsa
Umur (tahun)

Tinggi badan

Berat Badan

IMT

Mann-Whitney U

40.500

36.500

39.000

37.000

Wilcoxon W

85.500

81.500

84.000

82.000

.000

-.355

-.133

-.309

1.000

.722

.895

.757

1.000b

.730b

.931b

.796b

Mean Rank

Sum of Ranks

Z
Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed)
Exact Sig. [2*(1-tailed Sig.)]
a. Grouping Variable: Kelompok
b. Not corrected for ties.

NPar Tests: PRE-TEST
Mann-Whitney Test

Ranks
Kelompok

Skor kelincahan pre test

N

Perlakuan

9

9.78

88.00

Kontrol

9

9.22

83.00

Total

18

Test Statisticsa
Skor kelincahan pre test
Mann-Whitney U

38.000

Wilcoxon W

83.000

Z
Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed)
Exact Sig. [2*(1-tailed Sig.)]
a. Grouping Variable: Kelompok
b. Not corrected for ties.

-.221
.825
.863b

76

NPar Tests: POST-TEST
Mann-Whitney Test
Ranks
Kelompok

Skor kelincahan Post Test (minggu ke 8)

N

Mean Rank

Perlakuan

9

5.00

45.00

Kontrol

9

14.00

126.00

Total

18

Test Statisticsa
Skor kelincahan Post Test (minggu ke 8)
Mann-Whitney U

.000

Wilcoxon W

45.000

Z

-3.576

Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed)
Exact Sig. [2*(1-tailed Sig.)]
a. Grouping Variable: Kelompok
b. Not corrected for ties.

Sum of Ranks

.000
.000b

77

NPar Tests: Kelompok Perlakuan
Wilcoxon Signed Ranks Test

Ranks
N

b. Skor kelincahan Post Test (minggu ke 8) > Skor kelincahan Pre Test (minggu ke 0)
c. Skor kelincahan Post Test (minggu ke 8) = Skor kelincahan Pre Test (minggu ke 0)

Test Statisticsa
Skor kelincahan Post Test (minggu ke 8) - Skor
kelincahan Pre Test (minggu ke 0)
Z
Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed)
a. Wilcoxon Signed Ranks Test
b. Based on positive ranks.

-2.666b
.008

Sum of Ranks

Negative Ranks

9a

5.00

45.00

Positive Ranks

0b

.00

.00

Ties

0c

Total

9

Skor kelincahan Post Test (minggu ke 8) - Skor kelincahan Pre Test (minggu ke 0)

a. Skor kelincahan Post Test (minggu ke 8) < Skor kelincahan Pre Test (minggu ke 0)

Mean Rank

78

NPar Tests: Kelompok Kontrol
Wilcoxon Signed Ranks Test

Ranks
N

b. Skor kelincahan Post Test (minggu ke 8) > Skor kelincahan Pre Test (minggu ke 0)
c. Skor kelincahan Post Test (minggu ke 8) = Skor kelincahan Pre Test (minggu ke 0)

Test Statisticsa
Skor kelincahan Post Test (minggu ke 8) - Skor
kelincahan Pre Test (minggu ke 0)
Z
Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed)
a. Wilcoxon Signed Ranks Test
b. Based on positive ranks.

-2.668b
.008

Sum of Ranks

Negative Ranks

9a

5.00

45.00

Positive Ranks

0b

.00

.00

Ties

0c

Total

9

Skor kelincahan Post Test (minggu ke 8) - Skor kelincahan Pre Test (minggu ke 0)

a. Skor kelincahan Post Test (minggu ke 8) < Skor kelincahan Pre Test (minggu ke 0)

Mean Rank

79

Kelompok * Kategori Kelincahan Pre
Crosstab
Kelompok

Total

Perlakuan
Count

Kontrol

% within Kategori

Count

% within Kategori

Kelincahan Pre

Count

% within Kategori

Kelincahan Pre

Kelincahan Pre

Bawah Rata-rata

2

50.0%

2

50.0%

4

100.0%

Rata-rata

7

50.0%

7

50.0%

14

100.0%

9

50.0%

9

50.0%

18

100.0%

Asymp. Sig. (2-

Exact Sig. (2-

Exact Sig. (1-

sided)

sided)

sided)

Kategori Kelincahan Pre
Total

Chi-Square Tests
Value

Pearson Chi-Square
Continuity

Correctionb

Likelihood Ratio

df

.000a

1

1.000

.000

1

1.000

.000

1

1.000

Fisher's Exact Test
Linear-by-Linear Association
N of Valid Cases

1.000
.000

1

1.000

18

a. 2 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 2.00.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

.712

80

81

Kelompok*Kategori Kelincahan Post

Crosstab
Kategori Kelincahan Post
Bawah Rata-rata
Count

Rata-rata

Total

Atas Rata-rata

Sangat Baik

0

0

2

7

9

0.0%

0.0%

100.0%

100.0%

50.0%

2

7

0

0

9

100.0%

100.0%

0.0%

0.0%

50.0%

2

7

2

7

18

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

Perlakuan
% within Kategori Kelincahan Post
Kelompok
Count
Kontrol
% within Kategori Kelincahan Post
Count
Total
% within Kategori Kelincahan Post

Chi-Square Tests
Value

df

Asymp. Sig. (2sided)

18.000a

3

.000

Likelihood Ratio

24.953

3

.000

Linear-by-Linear Association

14.495

1

.000

Pearson Chi-Square

N of Valid Cases

18

a. 8 cells (100.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count
is 1.00.

82

83

Means: Delta Kelincahan
Case Processing Summary
Cases
Included
N

Excluded

Percent
18

N

100.0%

Total

Percent
0

0.0%

N

Percent
18

delta_kelincahan * Kelompok

Report
delta_kelincahan
Kelompok
Perlakuan
Kontrol
Total

Mean

Std. Deviation

Median

Minimum

Maximum

-5.7900

.83349

-5.3700

-7.16

-5.10

-.7922

.38577

-.8000

-1.67

-.42

-3.2911

2.64740

-3.3850

-7.16

-.42

100.0%

84

Lampiran 4. Dokumentasi penelitian

85

Lampiran 5. Biodata mahasiswa

Identitas
Nama

: Sarah Fauzianisa

NIM

: 22010112130208

Tempat, tanggal lahir : Bandung, 1 Maret 1994
Jenis Kelamin

: Perempuan

Alamat

: Jl, Gondang Timur 2, Bulusan, Tembalang – Semarang

Nomor HP

: 083822333913

e-mail

: sarahfauzianisa@gmail.com

Riwayat Pendidikan
SD

: SDN Banjarsari I, Bandung

lulus tahun 2006

SMP : SMP Negeri 5 Bandung

lulus tahun 2009

SMA : SMA Negeri 3 Bandung

lulus tahun 2011

Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Diponegoro

masuk tahun 2012