MEASURING FIT BETWEEN ACCOUNTING INFORMATION SYSTEM DESIGN, BUSINESS STRATEGY, AND ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE CASE STUDY: MEDIUM AND LARGE MANUFACTURING COMPANIES IN WEST SUMATERA - Repositori Universitas Andalas

CONTENT
Page
COVER………………………………………………………………………......i
CONTENT…………………………………………………………………….....ii
TABLE…………………………………………………………………………...v
FIGURE………………………………………………………………………..viii
APPENDIX……………………………………………………………………..ix
CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION
I.1 Background………………………………………………….1
I.2 Problem Definition…………………………………………..8
I.3 Research Questions………………………………………….8
I.4 Research Objective…………………………………………..9
I.5 Research Benefit……………………………………………10
I.6 Previous Research…………………………………………..10
CHAPTER II MANUFACTURING INDUSTRY OF WEST SUMATERA…15
CHAPTER III THEORITICAL FRAMEWORK
III.1 Contingency Theory………………………………………20
III.2 Business Strategy…………………………………………21
III.3 Organizational Structure………………………………….27
III.4 Accounting Information System………………………….29
III.5 Theoretical Framework….………………………………...33

III.6 The Relationship between AIS, Business Strategy,
and Organizational Structure…..………………………….34
III.6.1 AIS, Low-cost Strategy, and
Centralized Stucture………………………………..34
III.6.2 AIS, Low-cost Strategy, and
Decentralized Stucture……………………...………37
III.6.3 AIS, Differentiation Strategy, and
ii

Centralized Stucture………………………..……….37
III.6.4 AIS, Differentiation, and
Decentralized Stucture…………………………..….39
CHAPTER IV RESEARCH METHOD
IV.1 Population and Sampling…………………………………41
IV.2 Data Collection …………………………………………..42
IV.3 Variables and Measurements……………………………..42
IV.4 Questionnaire Development………………………………44
IV.5 Data Analysis Method……………………………………46
IV.5.1 Testing Goodness of Data………………….……..46
IV.5.2 Testing of Classic Assumption…………………….47

IV.5.3 Hypothesis Testing…………………………………48
CHAPTER V RESULT AND DISCUSSION
V.1 Result……………………………………………………...50
V.1.1 Descriptive for Questionnaire……………………50
V.1.2 Respondent Profile..……………………………..51
V.1.3 Factor Analysis…………………………………..53
V.1.3.1 Factor Analysis for
AIS Characteristics Variable…………...54
V.1.3.2 Factor Analysis for
Business Strategy Variable………….….59
V.1.3.4 Factor Analysis for
Organizational Structure Variable……...63
V.1.4 Test of Reliability………………………………..68
V.1.5 Descriptive Statistics for Variables……………...69
V.1.6 Hypothesis Testing………………………………79
V.1.6.1 Test of Normality……………………...80
iii

V.1.6.2 Test of ANOVA…………………….…81
V.2 Result Interpretation………………………………………91

V.2.1 Hypothesis 1…………………………………….92
V.2.2 Hypothesis 2…………………………………….93
V.2.3 Hypothesis 3…………………………………….94
V.2.4 Hypothesis 4…………………………………….95
V.3 Discussion…………………………………………………95
CHAPTER VI CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTIONS
VI.1 Conclusion………………………………………………..98
VI.2 Limitation of Research……………………………………98
VI.3
Suggestion………………………………………………….…………………...99
REFERENCES…………………………………………………………………..x

iv

TABLE
Page
Table 1.1

Previous Researches……………………………………………..11


Table 2.1

Sub Sector Classifications of Manufacturing Industries in
West Sumatera……………………………………………….......16

Table 4.1

The Sources of Questionnaire……………………………………45

Table 5.1

Summary of Delivered and Returned Questionnaires……….......51

Table 5.2

Respondent Profile………………………………………………52

Table 5.3

Summary of Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) and Bartlett’s

Test of Sphericity for AIS Characteristics Variable...................54

Table 5.4

Anti Image Matrices for AIS Characteristics Variable......................55

Table 5.5

Communalities.....................................................................................56

Table 5.6

Total Variance Explained for AIS Characteristics Variable
(Scope Indicator)...........................................................................57

Table 5.7

Total Variance Explained for AIS Characteristics Variable
(Timeliness Indicator)....................................................................58


Table 5.8

Total Variance Explained for AIS Characteristics Variable
(Aggregation Indicator)..................................................................58

Table 5.9

Total Variance Explained for AIS Characteristics Variable
(Integration Indicator)....................................................................59

Table 5.10

Summary of Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) and Bartlett’s
Test of Sphericity Business Strategy Variable...........................59

Table 5.11

Anti Image Matrices for Business Strategy Variable........................60

Table 5.12


Communalities……………………………………………….......61

Table 5.13

Total Variance Explained for Business Strategy Variable
(Low-Cost Indicator).....................................................................62

Table 5.14

Total Variance Explained for Business Strategy Variable
(Differentiation Indicator).............................................................63

Table 5.15

Summary of Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) and Bartlett’s
Test of Sphericity Organizational Structure Variable................63

Table 5.16


Anti Image Matrices for Organizational Structure Variable.............64

Table 5.17

Communalities...............................................................................66
v

Table 5.18

Total Variance Explained for Organizational Structure
Variable (Decentralization Indicator)............................................67

Table 5.19

Total Variance Explained for Organizational Structure
Variable (Centralization Indicator)...............................................67

Table 5.20

The Result of Reliability Testing for Instruments……………….68


Table 5.21

Frequency Distribution of Respondent for AIS Characteristics
(Scope Indicator)...........................................................................69

Table 5.22

Frequency Distribution of Respondent for AIS characteristics
Variable (Timeliness Indicator)....................................................70

Table 5.23

Frequency Distribution of Respondent for AIS Characteristics
Variable (Aggregation Indicator)..................................................71

Table 5.24

Frequency Distribution of Respondent for AIS Characteristics
Variable (Integration Indicator)....................................................73


Table 5.25

Frequency Distribution of Respondent for Business Strategy
Variable (Low-Cost Indicator)......................................................74

Table 5.26

Frequency Distribution of Respondent for Business Strategy
Variable (Differentiation Indicator)..............................................75

Table 5.27

Frequency Distribution of Respondent for Organizational
Structure Variable (Decentralization Indicator)............................76

Table 5.28

Frequency Distribution of Respondent for Organizational
Structure Variable (Centralization Indicator)................................78


Table 5.29

Result of Test of Normality One Sample Kolmogorow Smirnov
Test................................................................................................80

Table 5.30

The Result of Homogeneity Test (a)..............................................81

Table 5.31

The Result of Test of ANOVA (Hypothesis 1)..............................82

Table 5.32

Result of Multiple Comparisons (Hypothesis 1)............................83

Table 5.33

Result of Test of Homogeneity (b).................................................84

Table 5.34

Result of Test of ANOVA (Hypothesis 2).....................................84

Table 5.35

Result of Multiple Comparisons (Hypothesis 2)............................85

Table 5.36

Result of Test of Homogeneity (c).................................................86

Table 5.37

Result of Test of ANOVA (Hypothesis 3).....................................87

Table 5.38

Result of Multiple Comparisons (Hypothesis 3)............................87
vi

Table 5.39

Result of Test of Homogeneity (d).................................................88

Table 5.40

Result of Test of ANOVA (Hypothesis 4).....................................89

Table 5.41

Result of Multiple Comparisons (Hypothesis 4)............................90

Table 5.42

Summary of Hypothesis Testing…………………………………91

vii

FIGURE

Figure 3.1

Page
AIS Characteristics.......................................................................30

Figure 3.2

Theoretical Framework.................................................................33

viii

APPENDIX

List of Manufacturing Companies in West Sumatera 2009
Output of Data Analysis

ix

Dokumen yang terkait

MEASURING FIT BETWEEN ACCOUNTING INFORMATION SYSTEM DESIGN, BUSINESS STRATEGY, AND ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE CASE STUDY: MEDIUM AND LARGE MANUFACTURING COMPANIES IN WEST SUMATERA.

0 0 24

Investigating Accounting Information Quality and Accounting Information Systems through Organizational Factors (Survey on Manufacturing Companies in Bandung-Indonesia).

0 0 14

TOP MANAGEMENT TEAM (TMT) CHARACTERISTICS AND COMPANIES STRATEGY (CASE STUDY: SAMPLE COMPANIES IN WEST SUMATERA).

1 1 14

Organizational Factors and Accounting Information System Quality (Empiric Evidence from Manufacturing Firms in Bandung Indonesia).

0 0 11

WORKING CAPITAL MANAGEMENT AND PROFITABILITY OF MANUFACTURING COMPANIES IN INDONESIA - Repositori Universitas Andalas

0 0 1

WORKING CAPITAL MANAGEMENT AND PROFITABILITY OF MANUFACTURING COMPANIES IN INDONESIA - Repositori Universitas Andalas

0 0 2

WORKING CAPITAL MANAGEMENT AND PROFITABILITY OF MANUFACTURING COMPANIES IN INDONESIA - Repositori Universitas Andalas

0 0 6

MEASURING FIT BETWEEN ACCOUNTING INFORMATION SYSTEM DESIGN, BUSINESS STRATEGY, AND ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE CASE STUDY: MEDIUM AND LARGE MANUFACTURING COMPANIES IN WEST SUMATERA - Repositori Universitas Andalas

0 0 14

MEASURING FIT BETWEEN ACCOUNTING INFORMATION SYSTEM DESIGN, BUSINESS STRATEGY, AND ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE CASE STUDY: MEDIUM AND LARGE MANUFACTURING COMPANIES IN WEST SUMATERA - Repositori Universitas Andalas

0 0 1

MEASURING FIT BETWEEN ACCOUNTING INFORMATION SYSTEM DESIGN, BUSINESS STRATEGY, AND ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE CASE STUDY: MEDIUM AND LARGE MANUFACTURING COMPANIES IN WEST SUMATERA - Repositori Universitas Andalas

0 0 1