(UPDATE) MATERI KULIAH manajemen | Kuliah Di Awang-Awang chap11 int finance1

(1)

!

INTERNATIONAL

FINANCIAL

MANAGEMENT

EUN / RESNICK

Second Edition

11

Chapter Eleven

International Portfolio

Investments

Chapter Objectives:

1. Why investors diversify their portfolios internationally. 2. How much investors can gain from international

diversification.

3. The effects of fluctuating exchange rates on international portfolio investments.

4. Whether and how much investors can benefit from investing in U.S. based international mutual funds. 5. The reasons for “home bias” in portfolio holdings.


(2)

!

Chapter Outline

International Correlation Structure and Risk Diversification

Optimal International Portfolio Selection Effects of Changes in the Exchange Rate International Bond Investment

International Mutual Funds: A Performance Evaluation


(3)

!

Chapter Outline (continued)

International Diversification through Country Funds

International Diversification with ADRs International Diversification with WEBS Why Home Bias in Portfolio Holdings?


(4)

! $

International Correlation Structure and

Risk Diversification

Security returns are much less correlated across countries than within a country.

This is so because economic, political, institutional, and even psychological factors affecting security returns

tend to vary across countries, resulting in low correlations among international securities.

Business cycles are often high asynchronous across countries.


(5)

! %

International Correlation Structure

Stock Market AU FR GM JP NL SW UK US

Australia (AU) .586

France (FR) .286 .576

Germany (GM) .183 .312 .653

Japan (JP) .152 .238 .300 .416

Netherlands (NP)

.241 .344 .509 .282 .624

Switzerland (SW)

.358 .368 .475 .281 .517 .664

United Kingdom (UK)

.315 .378 .299 .209 .393 .431 .698

United States (US)

.304 .225 .170 .137 .271 .272 .279 .439

Relatively low international correlations imply that investors should be able to reduce portfolio risk more if they

diversify internationally rather than domestically.


(6)

! &

Domestic vs. International

Diversification

0.44 0.27 0.12 P or tf ol io R is k ( % )

Number of Stocks

1 10 20 30 40 50

Swiss stocks U.S. stocks

International stocks When fully diversified, an international portfolio can be less than half as risky as a purely U.S. portfolio. A fully diversified international portfolio is only 12 percent as risky as holding a single security.


(7)

! '

Optimal International Portfolio

Selection

The correlation of the U.S. stock market with the returns on the stock markets in other nations

varies.

The correlation of the U.S. stock market with the Canadian stock market is 70%.

The correlation of the U.S. stock market with the Japanese stock market is 24%.

A U.S. investor would get more diversification from investments in Japan than Canada.


(8)

! (

Summary Statistics for Monthly

Returns 1980-1992 ($U.S.)

Stock Market Correlation Coefficient Mean (%) SD (%) β β β β

CN FR GM JP UK

Canada (CN) .79 5.83 0.90

France (FR) 0.38 1.42 7.01 1.02

Germany (GM)

0.33 0.66 1.23 6.74 0.87

Japan (JP) 0.26 0.42 0.36 1.47 7.31 1.22

United Kingdom

0.58 0.54 0.49 0.42 1.52 5.41 0.90

United States 0.70 0.45 0.37 0.24 0.57 1.33 4.56 0.80

.79% monthly return = 9.48% per year


(9)

! )

Summary Statistics for Monthly

Returns 1980-1992 ($U.S.)

Stock Market Correlation Coefficient Mean (%) SD (%) β β β β

CN FR GM JP UK

Canada (CN) .79 5.83 0.90

France (FR) 0.38 1.42 7.01 1.02

Germany (GM)

0.33 0.66 1.23 6.74 0.87

Japan (JP) 0.26 0.42 0.36 1.47 7.31 1.22

United Kingdom

0.58 0.54 0.49 0.42 1.52 5.41 0.90

United States 0.70 0.45 0.37 0.24 0.57 1.33 4.56 0.80

β measures the sensitivity of the market to the world market. Clearly the Japanese market is

more sensitive to the world market than is the U.S.


(10)

! *

The Optimal International Portfolio

US

CN

GM UK

JP

FR

4.2%

1.53 OIP Efficient set


(11)

!

Composition of the OIP for a U.S. Investor

Belgian market 14.66%

Italian market 0.37%

Japanese market 9.25%

Dutch market 14.15%

Swedish market 20.26%

U.S. market 41.31%


(12)

!

1.53% 1.33%

Gains from

International Diversification

For a U.S. investor, the risk-return tradeoff for the optimal international portfolio and optimal domestic portfolio are shown below and at right.

OIP ODP Mean Return 1.53% 1.33% Standard Deviation

4.27% 4.56% risk

re

tur

n

4.27% 4.56%

OIP


(13)

!

Effects of Changes

in the Exchange Rate

The realized dollar return for a U.S. resident

investing in a foreign market will depend not only on the return in the foreign market but also on the change in the exchange rate between the U.S.


(14)

! $

Effects of Changes

in the Exchange Rate

The realized dollar return for a U.S. resident investing in a foreign market is given by

Where

R

i is the local currency return in the ith market

ei is the rate of change in the exchange rate between


(15)

! %

Effects of Changes

in the Exchange Rate

For example, if a U.S. resident just sold shares in a British firm that had a 15% return (in pounds) during a period when the pound depreciated 5%, his dollar return is 9.25%:


(16)

! &

Effects of Changes

in the Exchange Rate

The risk for a U.S. resident investing in a foreign market will depend not only on the risk in the

foreign market but also on the risk in the exchange rate between the U.S. dollar and the foreign

currency.

The ∆Var term represents the contribution of the

cross-product term, R

iei, to the risk of foreign


(17)

! '

Effects of Changes

in the Exchange Rate

This equation demonstrates that exchange rate fluctuations contribute to the risk of foreign investment through three channels:

1. Its own volatility, Var(ei).

2. Its covariance with the local market returns

Cov(R

i,ei).


(18)

! (

International Bond Investment

There is substantial exchange rate risk in foreign bond investment. This suggests that investors may be able to increase their gains is they can control this risk, for example with currency forward

contracts or swaps.

The advent of the euro is likely to alter the risk-return characteristics of the euro-zone bond

markets enhancing the importance of non-euro currency bonds.


(19)

! )

International Mutual Funds: A

Performance Evaluation

A U.S. investor can easily achieve international diversification by investing in a U.S.-based

international mutual fund. The advantages include:

1. Savings on transaction and information costs.

2. Circumvention of legal and institutional barriers

to direct portfolio investments abroad.


(20)

! *

International Mutual Funds: A

Performance Evaluation

As can be seen below, a sample of U.S. based international mutual funds has outperformed the S&P 500 during the period 1977-1986, with a higher standard deviation. ββββUS

Mean Annual Return Standard Deviation β ββ

βUS R2

U.S. Based International Mutual Funds

18.96% 5.78% 0.69 0.39

S&P 500 14.04% 4.25% 1.00 1.00

U.S. MNC Index


(21)

!

International Mutual Funds: A

Performance Evaluation

U.S. stock market movements account for less than 40% of the fluctuations of international mutual funds, but over 90% of the

movements in U.S. MNC shares. This means that the shares of U.S. MNCs behave like those of domestic firms, without providing effective international diversification. Mean Annual Return Standard Deviation β ββ

βUS R2

U.S. Based International Mutual Funds

18.96% 5.78% 0.69 0.39

S&P 500 14.04% 4.25% 1.00 1.00


(22)

!

International Diversification through

Country Funds

Recently, country funds have emerged as one of the most popular means of international

investment.

A country fund invests exclusively in the stocks of a single county. This allows investors to:

1. Speculate in a single foreign market with minimum

cost.

2. Construct their own personal international portfolios. 3. Diversify into emerging markets that are otherwise


(23)

!

American Depository Receipts

Foreign stocks often trade on U.S. exchanges as ADRs.

It is a receipt that represents the number of foreign shares that are deposited at a U.S. bank.


(24)

! $

American Depository Receipts

There are many advantages to trading ADRs as opposed to direct investment in the company’s shares:

ADRs are denominated in U.S. dollars, trade on U.S. exchanges and can be bought through any broker.

Dividends are paid in U.S. dollars.

Most underlying stocks are bearer securities, the ADRs are registered.


(25)

! %

International Diversification

with ADRs

Adding ADRs to domestic portfolios has a substantial risk reduction benefit.


(26)

! &

World Equity Benchmark Shares

World Equity Benchmark Shares (WEBS)

Country-specific baskets of stocks designed to replicate the country indexes of 14 countries.

WEBS are subject to U.S. SEC and IRS diversification requirements.

Low cost, convenient way for investors to hold


(27)

! '

International Diversification with

WEBS

Recent research suggests that WEBs are an

excellent tool for international risk diversification. For investors who desire international exposure, WEBs may well serve as a major alternative to such traditional tools as international mutual funds, ADRs, and closed-end country funds


(28)

! (

Why Home Bias in

Portfolio Holdings?

Home bias refers to the extent to which portfolio investments are concentrated in domestic equities.


(29)

! )

The Home Bias in Equity Portfolios

Country Share in World Market Value

Proportion of Domestic Equities in Portfolio

France 2.6% 64.4%

Germany 3.2% 75.4%

Italy 1.9% 91.0%

Japan 43.7% 86.7%

Spain 1.1% 94.2%

Sweden 0.8% 100.0%

United Kingdom 10.3% 78.5%

United States 36.4% 98.0%


(30)

! *

Why Home Bias in

Portfolio Holdings?

Three explanations come to mind:

1. Domestic equities may provide a superior

inflation hedge.

2. Home bias may reflect institutional and legal

restrictions on foreign investment.

3. Extra taxes and transactions/information costs

for foreign securities may give rise to home bias.


(31)

! $


(1)

! &

World Equity Benchmark Shares

World Equity Benchmark Shares (WEBS)

Country-specific baskets of stocks designed to replicate the country indexes of 14 countries.

WEBS are subject to U.S. SEC and IRS diversification requirements.

Low cost, convenient way for investors to hold


(2)

! '

International Diversification with

WEBS

Recent research suggests that WEBs are an

excellent tool for international risk diversification. For investors who desire international exposure, WEBs may well serve as a major alternative to such traditional tools as international mutual funds, ADRs, and closed-end country funds


(3)

! (

Why Home Bias in

Portfolio Holdings?

Home bias refers to the extent to which portfolio investments are concentrated in domestic equities.


(4)

! )

The Home Bias in Equity Portfolios

Country Share in World Market

Value

Proportion of Domestic Equities in Portfolio

France 2.6% 64.4%

Germany 3.2% 75.4%

Italy 1.9% 91.0%

Japan 43.7% 86.7%

Spain 1.1% 94.2%

Sweden 0.8% 100.0%

United Kingdom 10.3% 78.5%

United States 36.4% 98.0%


(5)

! *

Why Home Bias in

Portfolio Holdings?

Three explanations come to mind:

1. Domestic equities may provide a superior inflation hedge.

2. Home bias may reflect institutional and legal restrictions on foreign investment.

3. Extra taxes and transactions/information costs for foreign securities may give rise to home bias.


(6)

! $