(UPDATE) MATERI KULIAH manajemen | Kuliah Di Awang-Awang chap11 int finance1
!
INTERNATIONAL
FINANCIAL
MANAGEMENT
EUN / RESNICK
Second Edition
11
Chapter Eleven
International Portfolio
Investments
Chapter Objectives:
1. Why investors diversify their portfolios internationally. 2. How much investors can gain from international
diversification.
3. The effects of fluctuating exchange rates on international portfolio investments.
4. Whether and how much investors can benefit from investing in U.S. based international mutual funds. 5. The reasons for “home bias” in portfolio holdings.
(2)
!
Chapter Outline
International Correlation Structure and Risk Diversification
Optimal International Portfolio Selection Effects of Changes in the Exchange Rate International Bond Investment
International Mutual Funds: A Performance Evaluation
(3)
!
Chapter Outline (continued)
International Diversification through Country FundsInternational Diversification with ADRs International Diversification with WEBS Why Home Bias in Portfolio Holdings?
(4)
! $
International Correlation Structure and
Risk Diversification
Security returns are much less correlated across countries than within a country.
This is so because economic, political, institutional, and even psychological factors affecting security returns
tend to vary across countries, resulting in low correlations among international securities.
Business cycles are often high asynchronous across countries.
(5)
! %
International Correlation Structure
Stock Market AU FR GM JP NL SW UK US
Australia (AU) .586
France (FR) .286 .576
Germany (GM) .183 .312 .653
Japan (JP) .152 .238 .300 .416
Netherlands (NP)
.241 .344 .509 .282 .624
Switzerland (SW)
.358 .368 .475 .281 .517 .664
United Kingdom (UK)
.315 .378 .299 .209 .393 .431 .698
United States (US)
.304 .225 .170 .137 .271 .272 .279 .439
Relatively low international correlations imply that investors should be able to reduce portfolio risk more if they
diversify internationally rather than domestically.
(6)
! &
Domestic vs. International
Diversification
0.44 0.27 0.12 P or tf ol io R is k ( % )Number of Stocks
1 10 20 30 40 50
Swiss stocks U.S. stocks
International stocks When fully diversified, an international portfolio can be less than half as risky as a purely U.S. portfolio. A fully diversified international portfolio is only 12 percent as risky as holding a single security.
(7)
! '
Optimal International Portfolio
Selection
The correlation of the U.S. stock market with the returns on the stock markets in other nations
varies.
The correlation of the U.S. stock market with the Canadian stock market is 70%.
The correlation of the U.S. stock market with the Japanese stock market is 24%.
A U.S. investor would get more diversification from investments in Japan than Canada.
(8)
! (
Summary Statistics for Monthly
Returns 1980-1992 ($U.S.)
Stock Market Correlation Coefficient Mean (%) SD (%) β β β β
CN FR GM JP UK
Canada (CN) .79 5.83 0.90
France (FR) 0.38 1.42 7.01 1.02
Germany (GM)
0.33 0.66 1.23 6.74 0.87
Japan (JP) 0.26 0.42 0.36 1.47 7.31 1.22
United Kingdom
0.58 0.54 0.49 0.42 1.52 5.41 0.90
United States 0.70 0.45 0.37 0.24 0.57 1.33 4.56 0.80
.79% monthly return = 9.48% per year
(9)
! )
Summary Statistics for Monthly
Returns 1980-1992 ($U.S.)
Stock Market Correlation Coefficient Mean (%) SD (%) β β β β
CN FR GM JP UK
Canada (CN) .79 5.83 0.90
France (FR) 0.38 1.42 7.01 1.02
Germany (GM)
0.33 0.66 1.23 6.74 0.87
Japan (JP) 0.26 0.42 0.36 1.47 7.31 1.22
United Kingdom
0.58 0.54 0.49 0.42 1.52 5.41 0.90
United States 0.70 0.45 0.37 0.24 0.57 1.33 4.56 0.80
β measures the sensitivity of the market to the world market. Clearly the Japanese market is
more sensitive to the world market than is the U.S.
(10)
! *
The Optimal International Portfolio
US
CN
GM UK
JP
FR
4.2%
1.53 OIP Efficient set
(11)
!
Composition of the OIP for a U.S. Investor
Belgian market 14.66%
Italian market 0.37%
Japanese market 9.25%
Dutch market 14.15%
Swedish market 20.26%
U.S. market 41.31%
(12)
!
1.53% 1.33%
Gains from
International Diversification
For a U.S. investor, the risk-return tradeoff for the optimal international portfolio and optimal domestic portfolio are shown below and at right.
OIP ODP Mean Return 1.53% 1.33% Standard Deviation
4.27% 4.56% risk
re
tur
n
4.27% 4.56%
OIP
(13)
!
Effects of Changes
in the Exchange Rate
The realized dollar return for a U.S. resident
investing in a foreign market will depend not only on the return in the foreign market but also on the change in the exchange rate between the U.S.
(14)
! $
Effects of Changes
in the Exchange Rate
The realized dollar return for a U.S. resident investing in a foreign market is given by
Where
R
i is the local currency return in the ith market
ei is the rate of change in the exchange rate between
(15)
! %
Effects of Changes
in the Exchange Rate
For example, if a U.S. resident just sold shares in a British firm that had a 15% return (in pounds) during a period when the pound depreciated 5%, his dollar return is 9.25%:
(16)
! &
Effects of Changes
in the Exchange Rate
The risk for a U.S. resident investing in a foreign market will depend not only on the risk in the
foreign market but also on the risk in the exchange rate between the U.S. dollar and the foreign
currency.
The ∆Var term represents the contribution of the
cross-product term, R
iei, to the risk of foreign
(17)
! '
Effects of Changes
in the Exchange Rate
This equation demonstrates that exchange rate fluctuations contribute to the risk of foreign investment through three channels:
1. Its own volatility, Var(ei).
2. Its covariance with the local market returns
Cov(R
i,ei).
(18)
! (
International Bond Investment
There is substantial exchange rate risk in foreign bond investment. This suggests that investors may be able to increase their gains is they can control this risk, for example with currency forward
contracts or swaps.
The advent of the euro is likely to alter the risk-return characteristics of the euro-zone bond
markets enhancing the importance of non-euro currency bonds.
(19)
! )
International Mutual Funds: A
Performance Evaluation
A U.S. investor can easily achieve international diversification by investing in a U.S.-based
international mutual fund. The advantages include:
1. Savings on transaction and information costs.
2. Circumvention of legal and institutional barriers
to direct portfolio investments abroad.
(20)
! *
International Mutual Funds: A
Performance Evaluation
As can be seen below, a sample of U.S. based international mutual funds has outperformed the S&P 500 during the period 1977-1986, with a higher standard deviation. ββββUS
Mean Annual Return Standard Deviation β ββ
βUS R2
U.S. Based International Mutual Funds
18.96% 5.78% 0.69 0.39
S&P 500 14.04% 4.25% 1.00 1.00
U.S. MNC Index
(21)
!
International Mutual Funds: A
Performance Evaluation
U.S. stock market movements account for less than 40% of the fluctuations of international mutual funds, but over 90% of the
movements in U.S. MNC shares. This means that the shares of U.S. MNCs behave like those of domestic firms, without providing effective international diversification. Mean Annual Return Standard Deviation β ββ
βUS R2
U.S. Based International Mutual Funds
18.96% 5.78% 0.69 0.39
S&P 500 14.04% 4.25% 1.00 1.00
(22)
!
International Diversification through
Country Funds
Recently, country funds have emerged as one of the most popular means of international
investment.
A country fund invests exclusively in the stocks of a single county. This allows investors to:
1. Speculate in a single foreign market with minimum
cost.
2. Construct their own personal international portfolios. 3. Diversify into emerging markets that are otherwise
(23)
!
American Depository Receipts
Foreign stocks often trade on U.S. exchanges as ADRs.
It is a receipt that represents the number of foreign shares that are deposited at a U.S. bank.
(24)
! $
American Depository Receipts
There are many advantages to trading ADRs as opposed to direct investment in the company’s shares:ADRs are denominated in U.S. dollars, trade on U.S. exchanges and can be bought through any broker.
Dividends are paid in U.S. dollars.
Most underlying stocks are bearer securities, the ADRs are registered.
(25)
! %
International Diversification
with ADRs
Adding ADRs to domestic portfolios has a substantial risk reduction benefit.
(26)
! &
World Equity Benchmark Shares
World Equity Benchmark Shares (WEBS)Country-specific baskets of stocks designed to replicate the country indexes of 14 countries.
WEBS are subject to U.S. SEC and IRS diversification requirements.
Low cost, convenient way for investors to hold
(27)
! '
International Diversification with
WEBS
Recent research suggests that WEBs are an
excellent tool for international risk diversification. For investors who desire international exposure, WEBs may well serve as a major alternative to such traditional tools as international mutual funds, ADRs, and closed-end country funds
(28)
! (
Why Home Bias in
Portfolio Holdings?
Home bias refers to the extent to which portfolio investments are concentrated in domestic equities.
(29)
! )
The Home Bias in Equity Portfolios
Country Share in World Market Value
Proportion of Domestic Equities in Portfolio
France 2.6% 64.4%
Germany 3.2% 75.4%
Italy 1.9% 91.0%
Japan 43.7% 86.7%
Spain 1.1% 94.2%
Sweden 0.8% 100.0%
United Kingdom 10.3% 78.5%
United States 36.4% 98.0%
(30)
! *
Why Home Bias in
Portfolio Holdings?
Three explanations come to mind:1. Domestic equities may provide a superior
inflation hedge.
2. Home bias may reflect institutional and legal
restrictions on foreign investment.
3. Extra taxes and transactions/information costs
for foreign securities may give rise to home bias.
(31)
! $
(1)
! &
World Equity Benchmark Shares
World Equity Benchmark Shares (WEBS)
Country-specific baskets of stocks designed to replicate the country indexes of 14 countries.
WEBS are subject to U.S. SEC and IRS diversification requirements.
Low cost, convenient way for investors to hold
(2)
! '
International Diversification with
WEBS
Recent research suggests that WEBs are an
excellent tool for international risk diversification. For investors who desire international exposure, WEBs may well serve as a major alternative to such traditional tools as international mutual funds, ADRs, and closed-end country funds
(3)
! (
Why Home Bias in
Portfolio Holdings?
Home bias refers to the extent to which portfolio investments are concentrated in domestic equities.
(4)
! )
The Home Bias in Equity Portfolios
Country Share in World Market
Value
Proportion of Domestic Equities in Portfolio
France 2.6% 64.4%
Germany 3.2% 75.4%
Italy 1.9% 91.0%
Japan 43.7% 86.7%
Spain 1.1% 94.2%
Sweden 0.8% 100.0%
United Kingdom 10.3% 78.5%
United States 36.4% 98.0%
(5)
! *
Why Home Bias in
Portfolio Holdings?
Three explanations come to mind:
1. Domestic equities may provide a superior inflation hedge.
2. Home bias may reflect institutional and legal restrictions on foreign investment.
3. Extra taxes and transactions/information costs for foreign securities may give rise to home bias.
(6)
! $