The idea of absurdity reflected in the characterization of characters in Samuel Beckett`s Endgame - USD Repository
THE IDEA OF ABSURDITY REFLECTED IN THE
CHARACTERIZATION OF CHARACTERS IN SAMUEL
BECKETT’S ENDGAME
AN UNDERGRADUATE THESIS
Presented as Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements
for the Degree of Sarjana Sastra
in English Letters
By
ARMANDO SORIANO
Student Number: 034214123
ENGLISH LETTERS STUDY PROGRAMME
DEPARTMENT OF ENGLISH LETTERS
FACULTY OF LETTERS
SANATA DHARMA UNIVERSITY
YOGYAKARTA
2009
THE IDEA OF ABSURDITY REFLECTED IN THE
CHARACTERIZATION OF CHARACTERS IN SAMUEL
BECKETT’S ENDGAME
AN UNDERGRADUATE THESIS
Presented as Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements
for the Degree of Sarjana Sastra
in English Letters
By
ARMANDO SORIANO
Student Number: 034214123
ENGLISH LETTERS STUDY PROGRAMME
DEPARTMENT OF ENGLISH LETTERS
FACULTY OF LETTERS
SANATA DHARMA UNIVERSITY
YOGYAKARTA
2009
For my beloved Grandfathers,
Armando Soriano and Semuel Laikopan
.
AKNOWLEDGEMENTS
This Undergraduate Thesis had been improved by the help, support, and assistance of some people, who with their kindness, have been generous enough to be involved during the process of writing this thesis.
In this opportunity, I must thank Drs. Hirmawan Wijanarka, M.Hum.,my advisor, for his patience in guiding me writing this thesis, and for the suggestions that are really valuable. I thank Dewi Widyastuti, S.Pd.,M.Hum. ,my co-advisor, for the consultation, and Dr. Harry Susanto, S.J. for providing me the discussion and a lot of second opinions.
I thank God for His blessing and guidance. My sincere gratitude goes to my family, Bapa, Mama, IyOo, and the big family of Soriano and Laikopan, for the endless praying and support. I also thank my colleagues in KKN-XXXII- Kelompok 21 for the friendship, my companions in Media Sastra Community, and Sastra Mungil for the process, discussion, and help. I thank the buddies, Anton “ktx”, Vino Alberto, Nicodemus and Jonathan Martumpal for the different but inspirational perspective. A special thank goes to Guruh ‘Iyan-ahong’ and Fr. Evencio, OFM for providing me those rare books and also to all compatriots in those melanesian students communities for the solidarity.
Armando Soriano
TABLE OF CONTENTS TITLE PAGE ……………………………………………………………………. i APPROVAL PAGE
…………………………………………………….……….. ii
ACCEPTANCE PAGE
…………………………………………………………….. iii
LEMBAR PERNYATAAN ……………………………………………………….. iv
MOTTO PAGE……………………………………………………………………. v
DEDICATION PAGE ……………………………………………………………. vi
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS…………………………………………………….. vii
TABLE OF CONTENTS ………………………………………………………… viii
ABSTRACT………………………………………………………………………. ix
ABSTRAK
……………………………………………………………………….. x
CHAPTER I: INTRODUCTION
…………………………………………….... 1
A. Background of the Study ……………………………………………... 1
B. Problem Formulation ………………………………………………… 4
C. Objectives of the Study ……………………………………………….. 4
D. Definition of Terms …………………………………………………… 4
CHAPTER II: THEORETICAL REVIEW ……………………………………... 6 A. Review of Related Studies……………………………………………… 6 B. Review of Related Theories……………………………………………. 17 C. Theoretical Framework…………………………………………………. 24 CHAPTER III: METHODOLOGY
……………………………………………. 26
A. Object of the Study …………………………………………………… 26
B. Approach of the Study …………………………………………………. 27
C. Method of the Study …………………………………………………… 27
CHAPTER IV: ANALYSIS ……………………………………………………..
30 A. Characterization of Characters in Endgame …….……………………... 31
B. The Idea of Absurdity Reflected in the Characterization of Characters in Endgame …………................................................................................
48
1. The Routine ……………………………………………………
49 2. Meaningless Condition ………………………………………..
53 3. The End ……………………………………………………......
57 CHAPTER V: CONCLUSION ………………………………………………….
61 BIBLIOGRAPHY ………………………………………………………………... 65
ABSTRACT
ARMANDO SORIANO. The Idea of Absurdity Reflected in the Characterization of Characters in Samuel Beckett’s Endgame.
Yogyakarta: Departement of English Letters, Faculty of Letters, Sanata Dharma University, 2009.
Endgame is a play with the theme of a criticism on human’s existence.
The author, Samuel Beckett, is known as a dramatist who brings a new atmosphere to the field of theatre. The characters can be analyzed in their characterization to find a condition that criticizes the existence of human. The criticism can be seen in the idea of absurdity about human life that is reflected on the characters. The analysis on the characterization of the characters and its reflection of the idea of absurdity is the main goal to discuss in this study.
This study firstly tries to find out the characterization of the Clov, Hamm, Nagg, and Nell and the way it reflected the idea of absurdity. The play is containing a criticism or moreover can be said as an idea which is aimed to a reader. For this reason the writer choose to apply moral- philosophical approach in the study. The writer used the method of library research in collecting data and several processes that can be classified as reading data, analyzing data, and drawing conclusion.
Absurdity is philosophical idea raised by Albert Camus. It is a study that explores the reality of human life. One of the conclusions on this idea is that absurdity is the ultimate truth. Absurdity, according to Camus, cannot be explored thoroughly. It can only be identified by using the scheme of the explanation of idea of absurdity. The characters in the play trough their actions, speeches, and thinking, reflect some themes. These themes are the routine, meaningless condition, and the end. These themes, based on the Camus’ philosophy of absurdity, can be categorized as the reflection of the idea of absurdity. The criticism on the human existence that is raised by the author through the play can be seen by using the scope of Camus’ idea of absurdity as the characterization of characters shows the reflection of the idea of absurdity.
.
ABSTRAK The Idea of Absurdity Reflected in the ARMANDO SORIANO. Characterization of Characters in Samuel Beckett’s Endgame.
Yogyakarta: Departement of English Letters, Faculty of Letters, Sanata Dharma University, 2009.
Endgame
adalah naskah drama dengan tema mengenai kritik atas keberadaan manusia. Penulisnya Samuel Beckett, dikenal sebagai dramawan yang membawa nuansa baru dalam dunia teater. Tokoh-tokoh dalam drama ini dapat dianalisa berdasarkan penokohan mereka untuk menemukan kondisi yang mengkritik keberadaan manusia. Kritik ini dapat dilihat pada ide mengenai absurditas kehidupan manusia yang terefleksi oleh tokoh- tokoh dalam drama ini. Analisa mengenai penokohan tokoh Clov, Hamm, Nagg, dan Nell dan cara penokohan tersebut merefleksikan ide absurditas merupakan tujuan utama untuk dibahas di dalam studi ini.
Studi ini pertama-tama akan mencoba memaparkan penokohan dari Clov,Hamm,Nagg dan Nell dan cara penokohan tersebut merefleksikan ide absurditas.
Drama ini berisikan kritik yang dapat dikatakan sebagai ide yang diarahkan kepada pembaca. Berdasarkan alasan ini penulis memilih untuk menerapkan pendekatan moral-filosofis di dalam studi ini. Penulis menggunakan metode studi pustaka dalam mengumpulkan data dan beberapa proses yang dapat dijabarkan seperti membaca data, menganalisa data, dan menarik kesimpulan.
Absurditas adalah ide filosofis yang diungkapkan oleh Albert Camus. Ide ini adalah studi yang menjelajahi kenyataan dalam kehidupan manusia. Salah satu kesimpulan mengenai ide ini adalah bahwa absurditas adalah kebenaran mutlak. Absurditas menurut Camus tidak dapat dijelajahi secara tuntas. Ide ini hanya dapat dipelajari dengan menggunakan skema penjelasan tentang ide absurditas. Tokoh-tokoh di dalam Endgame melalui tindakannya, perkataannya, dan pemikirannya merefleksikan tema-tema tertentu. Tema-tema itu adalah rutinitas, kondisi ketiadaan makna, dan akhir. Tema-tema tersebut berdasarkan filsafat absurditas menurut Albert Camus dapat di kategorikan sebagai refleksi dari absurditas. Kritik atas keberadaan manusia yang diungkapkan oleh penulis naskah di dalam drama tersebut dapat dilihat dengan menggunakan pemahaman filsafat dari Camus di mana penokohan dari para tokohnya menunjukan refleksi dari ide tentang absurditas.
CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION A. Background of the Study The routine of human life has been an object of analysis and discussion by
many of the existentialism thinkers or philosophers. One among others is Albert
Camus who uses this routine as an element in his work. Another person, Samuel
Beckett, who is known more as a dramatist, also has used the theme of the routine
of human life. He stated that habit and routine were the "cancer of time”
(http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/literature/laureates/1969/press.html, accessed
thon October 11 , 2007). This theme can be said as a point where the discussion of
the absurdity can be started.In Endgame, the habit or the routine that the character has can be said as
one of the themes of the play. The use of this theme can be seen in the way the
character elaborated it in the play. In Beckett’s another work, Waiting for Godot,
the theme is about the act of waiting that became the main routine of the
characters. Waiting for Godot goes by showing the way the characters interact one
with another in their endless act of waiting. These characters find the fact that they
are in such condition where they are unable to run away from. This condition is
formed in the shape of the daily routine which is seemed like a trap for them.Albert Camus in his essay, Myth of Sisyphus, said that the absurdity of
human condition is that the situation of man who are full of the desire to explain
anything in his life and the world. He faced the reality that nothing can be
explained from life and the world.
But what is absurd is the confrontation of the irrational and the wild longing for
clarity whose calls echoes in the human heart. The absurd depends as much on
man as on the world. (Camus,1955:16).The moment of absurdity appears when man realized about his condition
of being. It is the time when he is aware about his existence. This awareness
raised a basic question about man’s existence. This awareness also leads mean to
a feeling of alienation between him and the world. Camus describes this situation
by using the example of people with their routine.Rising, streetcar, four hours of work, meal, sleep, and Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday and Saturday according to the same rhythm-this path is easily followed most of the time. But one day the "why" arises and everything begins in that weariness tinged with amazement. In another words, absurdity arises from moments when all the acts of life that flow mechanically
stop, and when consciousness starts to wake up and move (Camus, 1955:15).
Martin Esslin in The Theatre of the Absurd, a book that introduced the
term of The Theater of The Absurd in the field of theatre, analyzed Beckett and
his work using the theme of The Search for The Self. Endgame is discussed in
many aspects, such as the symbolism, the relation to other works of Beckett, and
also the bibliographical aspect of the author. Beckett, as said in The Theater of the
, is influenced by James Joyce, the writer who is a friend and literary Absurd master of Beckett.Endgame then becomes an allegory of the relationship between the domineering, nearly blind Joyce and his adoring disciple, who felt himself crushed by his master’s overpowering literary influence…Yet Endgame undoubtedly, has a very large number of human beings. The problems of the relationship between a literary master and his pupil would be very unlikely
As we can see in many of Beckett’s work, Endgame is full with the tone of
pessimistic, and the pathetic of life. Characters appear in their physical boundary
and their inability to reach the reason or the meaning of their lives. Everything
seems nothing. It will be like what Beckett said that “nothing is more real than
thnothing” (http://samuel-beckett.net/godot_greg html, accessed on October 11 ,
2007). also shows Beckett’s contemplation about the contradictionEndgame
between man’s personality and the world outside. The setting of the play is an
inside part the room of a house that said as the building for the last human beings
on earth. There is little description about the outside part of the room. Hamm, one
of the characters, always said that outside the room is “a death” (Beckett,
1986:96). The only thing that seemed clear for the characters is the death, the
natural end of their life that exactly will happen. Esslin showed this as the symbol
of the personality of man and the power outside him.In Endgame we are also certainly confronted with a very powerful expression of the sense of deadness, of leaden heaviness and hopelessness, that is the experienced in the states of deep depression: the world outside goes for the victim of such states, but inside his mind there is ceaseless argument between parts of his personality that have become autonomous entities (Esslin, 1969:48).
The characterization of characters in Endgame leads to Camus ‘idea of
absurdity. Their failure to communicate with each other and the condition and all
the contradiction that appear between them and the world are the points that will
guide the study to find a reflection of the idea of absurdity. This thesis will
analyze the characterization of the four characters, Clov, Hamm, Nagg, and Nell
B. Problems Formulation
In the relation with the explanation above, the writer raises two problems formulation that will be discussed further in the thesis.
1. How are Clov, Hamm, Nagg, and Nell characterized in Samuel Beckett’s
Endgame ?
2. How does the characterization of characters in Endgame reflect the idea of
absurdity? C. Objectives of the StudyConcerning the problems formulation that have been stated previously, the objectives of the study are represented as follows.
The first objective is to find out how Clov, Hamm, Nagg, and Nell are characterized in Endgame.
The second objective is to identify how characterization of characters in Endgame reflects the idea of absurdity.
D. Definition of Term As stated in the title and explored in the above explanation, the writer
define the key concept of this study namely absurdity. In this Thesis the writer
applied Albert Camus’ concept of the idea of absurdity for the discussion.1. Absurdity The term of absurdity is defined into two major meanings. Firstly, one
refers to the general term of absurdity as described in dictionary. According to the
New Oxford American Dictionary Second Edition (2005), absurdity is the quality
or state of being ridiculous or wildly unreasonable.Another meaning of absurdity is rather specific to a philosophical term.
According to Albert Camus, absurdity can be said as the feeling, or situation
which is born of a confrontation between the human need of meaning and the
unreasonable silence of the world. In The Myth of Sisyphus Camus said as
follows.A world that can be explained even with bad reasons is a familiar world. But, on the other hand, in a universe suddenly divested of illusions and lights, man feels an alien, a stranger. His exile is without remedy since he deprived of the memory of a lost home or the hope of a promised land. This divorce between man and his life, the actor and his setting, is properly the feeling of absurdity (Camus, 1955:5).
CHAPTER II THEORETICAL REVIEW A. Review of Related Studies In the English Department of Sanata Dharma University, the studies on
absurdity had been conducted before. One of them is an undergraduate thesis by
Dicky Christanto entitled “Humanity, Absurdity, and Atheism Found in Albert
Camus’ The Plague in Relation with Karl Marx’ Criticism Toward Religion”.
This thesis analyzed the relation of Camus’ theory with Marx’ criticsm toward
religion. The analysis was aimed to find the answer for the philosophical
explanation of the main character believe on the atheism, the implication of the
main character atheism understanding toward the other character in the story in
relation to their atheism, the similarity and the difference of the atheism and it’s
application showed by the main character and the message from discussion over
the discourse of atheism on the story (Christanto, 1998:6).The other study is F.X. Lilik Dwi Mardjianto’s “The Significance of the
Characterization of the Minor characters to the Elaboration of the Theme in Albert
Camus’ The Stranger”. This study tries to find the characterization of the minor
character and then explores the significance of the characterization as the
antithesis of absurdity to the development of the theme of the story (Mardjianto,
2005:6).One of the studies on absurdity that analyzed Beckett’s works of drama is
done by Martin Esslin in his book The Theatre of the Absurd that the title became
Beckett and his works as The search for the self. The analysis on Beckett’s works
in this book was done in numbers of aspects.In The Theatre of the Absurd, Esslin said about the earlier works of
Samuel Beckett. One example of the works is Beckett’s poem Whoroscope which
presenting the philoshoper Descartes’ meditation. Another Beckett’s works is his
study on Proust, the French novelist, essayist, and critic. In this study, the theme
of Beckett’s later works can be seen such as his disbelief in communication. This
theme is inspired by Proust whose idea is that the art is the apotheosis of solitude.
On the communication, Proust said that there is no communication because there
are no vehicles of communication (Esslin, 1969:13).On the characters of Endgame, Esslin has done numbers of analysis in his
book that the writer will not state it entirely in here. The points that will be
reviewed are those that have been considered as having a significant issue to the
analysis. In his book, Esslin pointed out that Endgame can be seen as a
monodrama. This is a psychological view on the play. Endgame is seen as a
structure of a psychological part of a man. Esslin said that in the play the character
of Clov is performing the function of the senses for his senile master Hamm. This
idea is about the representation of different aspects of single personality.Hamm, Blind and emotional; Clov, performing the function of the senses for him- all these might well represent different aspects of a single personality, repressed memories in the subconscious mind, the emotional and the intellectual selves (Esslin,1969 : 44).
Another psychological view on characters in Beckett’s work, in The
Theatre of the Absurd , is the characteristic that the characters of Beckett’s
different works have in common. It is about idea that the characters in most of
Beckett’s drama are all often been noticed for their peculiar psychological reality.
The characters from Beckett’s Waiting for Godot, Vladimir and Estragon, have
been seen as so complementary that they might be the two halves of a single
personality, the conscious and the subconscious mind. Each of these three pairs
Pozzo-Lucky, Vladimir-Estragon, Hamm-Clov is linked by a relationship of
mutual independence, wanting to leave each other, at war with each other, and yet
dependent on each other. It is also an image of the interrelatedness of the elements
within a single personality, particularly if the personality is in conflict with itself
(Esslin, 1969:45).Esslin’s study also said about Beckett’s using the idea of disbelief on
communication. It is said as an original experience of Beckett himself which is
more profound and fundamental nature than mere autobiography. Endgame is said
as a revelation of Beckett’s experience of temporarily and evanescence; his sense
of the difficulty of communication between human beings (Esslin, 1969:48).
Beckett is said as a writer who success in depicting the inner side of a person. His
creative intuition explores the elements of experience and shows to what extent all
human beings carry the seeds of such depression and disintegration within the
deeper layers of their personality (Esslin, 1969:48).Esslin also reviewed the atmosphere that Beckett used in writing his
works. Esslin said that in Endgame we are confronted with a great expression of
pathetic and pessimism of life. The indications for this expression are the sense of
deadness, leaden heaviness, and hopelessness. This idea drawn a scheme about the
situation between an argument in man’s mind and the depression condition
surround him.In Endgame we are also certainly confronted with a very powerful expression of the sense of deadness, of leaden heaviness and hopelessness, that is experienced in states of deep depression: the world outside goes dead for the victim of such states, but inside his mind there is ceaseless argument between part of his personality that have become autonomous entities (Esslin, 1969:48).
On the other hand, Esslin also criticized Endgame. He said that Endgame
is lacking of characters and plot. Characters in Endgame, Hamm and Clov, Nagg
and Nell, are not characters but the embodiments of basic human attitudes. He
stated that these characters are rather like the personified virtues and vices in
medieval mystery plays or Spanish autos sacramentales (Esslin, 1969:53).
Moreover, Esslin made a conclusion on the feature that he thought as the main
factor of success of Beckett’s Plays.This is also the key to the wide success of Beckett’s plays: to be confronted with concrete projections of the deepest fears and anxieties, which have been only vaguely experienced at a half-concious level, constitutes a process of catharsis and liberation analogous to the therapeutic effect in psychoanalysis of confronting the subconscious content of mind (Esslin, 1969:48).
The most dominated analysis in The Theatre of the Absurd is about the
biography of Beckett and his exploration about the elusiveness of human
personality in his works. The theme, the search for the self, is deeply explored in
Esslin’s study on Beckett’s work. As we can see in his opinion in Beckett’s other
play, Krapp’s last Tape, Esslin said that Beckett has found graphic expression for
the problem of the human ever-changing identity (Esslin, 1969:55).Through the brilliant device of the autobiographical library of annual recorded statements, Beckett has found a graphic expression for the problem of the ever-changing identity of the self, which already described in his essay on proust. In Krapp’s Last Tape, the self at one moment in time is confronted
with its earlier incarnation only to find it utterly strange (Esslin,1969:56).
Another study on Beckett is Alan Astro’s Understanding Samuel Beckett.
This book provides an analysis on Beckett’s works such as his early writings,
major novels, and major theatrical works. The analysis on the character can be
seen in several parts. Astro analyzed on Beckett’s drama in a complex way. The
analysis is dominated with Astro’s opinion on the way Beckett used the theme of
pessimism and the chaotic atmosphere in most of his play.In his analysis on Endgame, Astro focused on the relation between two
major characters in it, Hamm and Clov. Their physical description is the object
that Astro used for his analysis. The relation between Hamm and Clov is said as
the pseudocouple in the way they are complementing each other.Later we learn he is Hamm, Clov’s blind and paralyzed master. He cannot stand, and Clov cannot sit. They complement each other’s infirmities, as befits a pseudocouple (Astro, 1990:132).
The catastrophe that is used as the setting of Endgame is one of the objects
of Astro’s analysis. The setting of Endgame is described as a painful place. A
great holocaust has happened in the world. This condition has affected the
characters. They live a sorrowful life. Astro gives a philosophical opinion about
Hamm. He said that Hamm’s need of pain-killer can be interpreted as his sickness
of his existence.Life in this postholocaust world is quite painful. Hamm repeatedly asks Clov for a pain-killer, and Clov always answers that the time for it has not yet to come. Until the end when he informs him,”There’s no more pain-killer” (E 71). These words apply to the audience as well: we share the characters’ pain as spectators of the terribly laborious dialogue and action. We cannot escape from the fact that existence is painful, and that world is bent on destruction. (Astro, 1990:132).
Astro’s book provided opinion from other philosopher about the
significant of holocaust setting that is used in Endgame. It posted the Theodore
Adorno’s opinion about the using of symbols in Endgame. It is an argument about
the significant of Ardens mountains that has been used as the setting for the place
where Nagg and Nell, two of four characters in the play, having an accident and
lost their legs.Theodore Adorno, the social theoretician of the Frankfurt school, argues in an article on Endgame that the reference to the Ardennes Mountains is significant, for they were the site of one of the first modern mass destruction, the battlegrounds of World-War I (Astro, 1990:132).
The idea of denying the existence of God appears as one of objects that
can be seen in the character. God, according to Astro’s analysis, is said as the
nonexistent creator for characters in Endgame. This can be seen in the part where
Astro discussed about they way Beckett use Antonin Artaud’s perception about
the modern theatre.Beckett follows the precepts of Antonin Artaud, who urged that modern theater leave realism behind and look toward classical Greek theater and its origin in ritual. Sacrifice is the most dramatic of rituals, and it is an important part of Endgame, where all humankind is offered up in an empty holocaust to
a God of whom Hamm says “the bastard! He doesn’t exist”(Astro,1990:133).
The names of the four characters, Clov, Hamm, Nagg, and Nell, are
analyzed in the relation of their position, and condition on the play and as a
system of symbolism. These names said as having symbolical relation of the
significant of one characters towards the others.Hamm would be the hammer, merciless against all humanity, who bears down on several nails: his slave Clov (Clou in French means Nail), his father Nagg ( Nagel is german for Nail)and his mother Nell(who name sounds like Nail)(Astro,1990:134).
The study on Endgame in Understanding Samuel Beckett also analyzed the
concept of time that is used in Endgame. To reach this, Astro analyzed the way
the character said about time. There is a significant relationship between the
character and time. On the idea of time, which is a complex one, Astro drew a
conclusion about the eternity of time as the time setting of the play.Hamm then says that “time was never and time is over, reckoning closed and story ended”(E 83). That time should be both over and never have been is contradictory but not illogical; if time has ended, we are in a timeless dimension; therefore it is impossible for time to have existed before, for there could be no “before” (Astro, 1990:135).
In Endgame, Hamm has knowledge about a paradox of the end of time that
leads him to doubt that anything can end. The characters will not reach the end
since they will not feel or aware of it because they already end or death when the
end appears. As Astro stated that death is something that, in a sense, never comes.
Wait for it as we like, when it arrives we have died and cannot know it has arrived
(Astro, 1990:135).The idea of end that never arrives in Endgame is related to Sartre’s
concept of existentialism. This opinion about an end in Endgame is only can be
understood by using Sartre idea about being. This concept will help in
understanding the idea that it is impossible to say that anything could reach finish
in Endgame. It will be related to what professor Astro said as the “Non-
dimensional world”.It seems impossible for anything to finish in Endgame, for if all human life ceased, there would be nothingness, not and an “end”. In order that there be an end, a subjectivity is required to notice the ending; ends do not exist in themselves (Astro, 1990:137).
Endgame has been an object of numbers of analyses. Most of them
characters are characterized. Others focused on the fact that the play could be
analyzed on its use of symbolism, the way it criticizing something, the value of
philosophical ideas in it, and its relation with Beckett’s life.In the relation to the school of philosophical thoughts Endgame is said as
having a critique toward several philosophical and aesthetic movements. Endgame
implies a critique of several philosophical and aesthetic movements: Naturalism,
Realism, Romanticism, Classicism, Enlightenment progress, Empiricism, and
Rationalism (http://[email protected] .accessed on October, 2007).
Many studies on Beckett’s dramas are made by the comparison between
them. Beckett’s most known play, Waiting for Godot, is the one that is mostly
used to be compared with others. As we can see in Wallace Fowlie’s Dionysus in
, it said that Endgame is having much features than Waiting for Godot. The Parisanalysis about this features concern on the style of acting and performances that is
used in Endgame ( http:// www.theatrehistory.com/irish/beckett/endgame. html.
Accessed on October, 2007).
Beckett’s style of writing in Endgame is said as indicates with great
precision, as if he was writing a musical score, the pauses between speeches. This
is unusual for the French style of acting. If observed in the performance of the
play, the effect may well enhance the painfulness of waiting, the emptiness of
existence, the expectancy of collapse, of a manifestation of total despair. The
innumerable pauses between speeches when the stage is silent underscore the
anguish in each of the four characters and the nudity of the words themselves
when they are spoken (http:// www.theatrehistory.com/irish/beckett/endgame.
Beckett is said as a play writer that allows total freedom to directors,
actors and critics, but then wishes to correct their interpretations. Worton in his
essay said that, Beckett does not want his actors to act. He wants them to do only
what he tells them. When they try to act, he becomes very angry.
What is most interesting is that whenever he directed or was closely involved in
the production of his plays, he focused on different aspects
(http://web.archive.org/web/20010128075500/http://www.cyberuni.vu/wormi001.
html. Accessed on October, 2007).Worton in his review of Endgame is comparing the theme that is used in
the play with the later works of Beckett’s novels. It cannot be denied, of course,
that Waiting for Godot and Endgame present many of the themes already explored
in the novels, all of which centre on the complex problem of how we can cope
with being-in-time. There is the abiding concern with death and dying, but death
as an event (i.e., actually becoming “a little heap of bones”) is presented as desired
but ultimately impossible, whereas dying as a process is shown to be our only
sure reality. Beckett's characters are haunted by “the sin of having been born”, a
sin which they can never expiate. Pozzo remarks that, one day we were born, one
day we shall die, the same day, the same second
(http://web.archive.org/web/20010128075500/http://www.cyberuni.vu/wormi001.
html. Accessed on October, 2007).As we have already seen in Astro’s analysis on Beckett’s play, the concept
of time is one of the analyzed objects. Worton also put this as one of the topic in
his analysis, Waiting for Godot and Endgame: Theatre as Text. The concept of
continuity. In other words, time indubitably exists as a force of which the
characters are aware in that they become increasingly decrepit, but they have no
sense of its continuity. If each day is like all the others, how can they then know
that time is really passing and that an end is night. Waitng for Godot is grounded
in the promise of an arrival that never occurs, and Endgame is the promise of a
departure that never happens. This would seem to imply that the characters look
forward to the future, yet if there is no past, there can be neither present nor
future. So in order to be able to project onto an unlocatable, and perhaps non-
existent future, the characters need to invent a past for themselves
(http://web.archive.org/web/20010128075500/http://www.cyberuni.vu/wormi001.
html. Accessed on October, 2007).Samuel Beckett was known with his inspirable works that open a new
chapter in the world of Theatre. We can see this in an article on New York Times
which said about Beckett’s influence to the traditional character. It said that,
Beckett's great innovation in Waiting for Godot and Endgame is both to question
the formal structure that playwrights of previous traditions have felt obliged to
respect, and to offer a mimesis or representation of reality that recognizes and
inscribes the formlessness of existence without attempting to make it 'fit' any
model.” ''(http://www.nytimes.com/books/97/08/03/reviews/20046.html.
Accessed on October, 2007 ).Beckett himself gives an opinion about the new form that he brings in the What I am saying does not mean that there will henceforth be no form in art. It only means that there will be a new form, and that this form will be of such a type that it admits the chaos, and does not try to say that the chaos is really something else. The form and the chaos remain separate. The latter is not reduced to the former. That is why the form itself becomes a preoccupation, because it exists as a problem separate from the material it accommodates. To find a form that accommodates the mess, that is the task of the artist (http://www.nytimes.com/books/97/08/03/reviews/20046.html. Accessed on ). October, 2007 Beckett’s work is mostly considered as a work which has an element of
bleakness. This consideration might comes from the use of pathetic, and