The effect of using picture series with oral questions on the narrative writing achievement of the English Department students of Widya Mandala University - Widya Mandala Catholic University Surabaya Repository

APPENDD(

MATERIALS OF EXPERIMENTAL GROTJPIN THE FIRST TREATMENT.

TTTLE

: TFIEBRAVE MOUNTAIN CLIMBER

DAY/DATE

: Thursday,6November1997.

PROCEDURES:
l. The studentsare given picture-series.
2. Theteachergivestriggeringquestionsrelatedto the picturesgiven.

TYPESOF QUESTIONS:
l. Whatdid the innkeeperdo in PictureI ?
2. What did the man do in Picture2 ?
3. Why did the manlook frighten in Picture 3 ?
4. WhatdidthemandoinPicture4 ?

5. Did the tiger die ?
6. With what tools did the man useto hit the tiger ?
7. Whathappenedto the tiger ?
8. Why did the peoplewavetheir handsin Pictue 6 ?

6n,
_\-

)V

IITATERALS OF CONTROL GROTJPIN TFE FIRST TREATMENT.
: TT{EBRAVE MOUNTAIN CLIMBER
DAY/DATE : Friday,7 November1997.
PROCEDURES:
I

The studentsare given list of vocabularyand headingsbased on the title
presented.

LIST OF VOCABULARIES :

inn

hunter

look at

staff

scenery

innkeeper

admiration

strike/hit

fierce horor

tiger


proud

persuade
prevent

F{EADINGS:
l. The innkeeperwarnedthe climber aboutthe wild tiger on the mountain.
2, He ignoredthe man.
3. Hecontinuedhisjourney.
4. He sawthe tiger.
5. Therewasa fight.
6. The manwon, manyhunterswereproudof him.

MATERHLS

OF THE EXPERI}IENTAL

GROT]P IN THE SECOND

TREATMENT.

TITLE

: WAITING FORA BUS.

DAY/DATE

: Thursday,13November1997.

PROCEDURES

:

1. The studentsaregivenpicture-series.
2. The teachergives triggeringquestionsto lead the studentsto enterthe pictures.
TYPESOF QUESTIONS:
1. What were the threesmall boys in Picture 1 ?
2. Wherewerethe four big boys?
3. Why did the peoplein the queueget wet ?
4. Whatdid the four big boysdo in Picture2 ?
5. Why did the conductorhold out his arm in Picture 3 ?

6. What had the three small boysto do ?
7. How long had they to wait for the next bus ?
8. Wherewasthe bus in Picture 5 ?
9. Whathappened
to the number26 bus?
10.Whatdid the threesmallbovsdo in Picture6 ?

t

/"-A
of

llrh

\uez

I

rffirlF
il#Jlt'-t-


ir-i-iirTL*
i!*dJ

cn
ql

f)

FI

t,

r9
L

o
o)

t'{(Q


a-

{-J

.E

f!{

/v/t/t)rl

\lv

TITLE

: WAITINGFORABUS

DAYiDATE : Friday,14 November1997.
PROCEDURES:
I


The studentsare given list of vocabularyand headingsbased on the title
presented.

LISTOF VOCABULARIES :
queue

clock

passenger

bus-stop

window

hilt

driver

engine


tired

pass

come

gel on

push

tull

bus-conductor

T{EADINGS:
l. Threeboyswerewaitingfor a bus.
2. They were pushedaway from the line by the four big boys.
3. The buswasfull, waitedfor anotherbus.
4. The four big boys' enginewasbroken.

5. Thethreeboys' buscouldpassthe first bus.
6. Theylaughedand mockedat them.

MATERIALS

OF TEE

EXPERIIVIENTAL GROT'P IN

THE

THIRD

TREATMENT.

TTTLE

: CATCHINGATHIEF

DAY/DATE


: Thursday,20 November1997.

PROCEDURES
1 . Thestudents
aregivenpicture-series.

The teacherguidesthe studentsthroughsome
pictures.

TYPESOF QUESTIONS:
1. WherewereBill andJoein PictureI ?
2. What did they hear?
3. Whatdid they see?
4. Whatdid the mando in Picture2 ?
5. What did the boyschasehim ?
6. What happenedin Picture3 ?
7. Whatdid the peoplein this picturedo ?
8. Why didn't the policemanin Picture4 helpthe boys?
9. Whatdid he do ?
10.Why wasthe manin the chairveryangry?

questionsto enter the

l.F
t;

o
ca

tt:l

P

cg
lll

l)I
(-

EO
F

(E

O

MATERIALS OF THE CONTROL GROUP IN THE TEIRD TREATMENT.

TITLE

CATCHINGATHIEF

DAYIDATE

Friday,2l November1997.

PROCEDURES
I

The studentsare given list of vocabulariesand headingsbased on the title
presented.

LIST OF VOCABULARIES :
shop

watch

thief

film

camera

mistake

surprised

brave

angry

break (to)notice

approach

steal

chase

catch

fight believe

}IEADINGS:
1. Bill andJohnwent for a walk.
2. Theysawa burglarbreakingthejewelry shop'swindow display.
3. Theyran after him andattackedhim.
4. The directorof film got angry.

MATERIALS OF THE EXPERIMENTAL AND CONTROL GROI]P IN THN
POSTTEST.

TITLE

: lvfY MOST EXCITING DAY (IN MY LIFE).

DAY/DATE

: Thwsday,4 December1997.

PROCEDURES

:

r

The teacherexplainsaboutthe title and ask the studentsto write their own
withoutanymedia.
expenence

THE CALCULATION OFTAKING GROTIP
AS SAMPLES FORTEE EXPERIMENTS

GRO UP S

NUMBEROF
STIIDENTS

A

B

c

D

E

F

l.

56
56
54
57
53
60
4l
66
67
63
53
62
57
4l
27
43

48
57
50
42
64
64

32
57
65
32
66
54
50
67
65
60
34
56
29
37
68
5l
65
4l
64
63

56
46
43
6l
49
53
43
46
46

s6

51
53
40
30
56
{s
68
49
47
54
58
37
65
53
53
56
48
53
67
35

53
48
5l
42
62
46
37
27
62
50

73
69
75
73
7l
70
85
72
80
72
72
73
70
70
74
7l
8l
89
80
75

TOTAL

1060

1030

1084

1056

955

1s64

MEAN

53

51.5

54.2

52.8

47.75

78.2

a

-).
4.
)6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
ll.
t2.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.

3t
))

56

6s
38
65
57
5l
69
57
66
42
4l
39
37
68
44

JJ

CALCULATIONFORTWO MEANSOF THE TEST

NO.

1.
2.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
TOTAL

DGERIMENTAL GROUP

CONTROLGROUP

XA

t'A

XD

xzD

56

3136
3136
2916
3249
2809
3600
l68l
4356
4489
3969
2809
3844
3249
l68l
729
1849
1369

32
57
65

29
37
68
51
65
4l
64
63

1024
3249
4225
1024
43s6
2916
2500
4489
422s
3600
1156
3136
841
1369
4624
2601
4225
1681
4096
3969

1056

59306

s6
54
57
53
60
4l
66
67
63
53
62
57
4l
21
43
5t

55
56
56
1060

302s
3136
3136
58168

66
54
50
67
65
60
34

s6

n

20

20

MEAN

53

52.8

SD

10.22895

13.66747

ii5|3

I fJ:--5--:

ilYiu

uF

:

- . i - * . . : j i - - . - . + . 1r . i ; g r e n c e

-; -r ! _ '

f.tc.

=.+rj'

c i : -f - i s r = i l . a

-qig-ificant

J,.

t

f ar

Calcniatic,n

be.tlrc-en

l*t.+r€en

c,b--ei-va ti- c,n i ia)

+{;
f

:.t =

.,

----------'-

-::::1-:-1:':::1!

n

_:j'

i

-t

a?l

i n- 1 )

g, .
.:_

=f,

rrl:r?
F

. - -

-

ljt-,

tirl)'
1 i : ). 3 " 9 9 5

l ,

n

i n--1 i

1L
-*"- ----- ,
,l 1_:nl_i"l_:1':
:11_:i'_:::
( ----rrA 'i- r'rF: -

f

nll\

-r- *---.

)

rr l:i

:
Ct J i \l c L U g M' l
.,:. l: ( i-i--'/2.'l
r-)- {:,:r:f,?::
/|
t::t,tte r- t t',.i: i c,rr .,/ '=
F-tec;ru.:el
"
s a l l c ' i :i a c c E p ' L trj c l ,,
:. ft ir r t: i i:
l r,-,v,;"-i
;rt: , i i:) ., r:;:-'
F l s n i :E : r,Jta c .rr' !c l u rrJ e r ti r;:t
d i i f e r i - e | r c : r : :[]l (::tt ul:,1 t: ar (j i'- o Li l: 1 !3 T ,c - . .s, i . J n i i i c a r i t

MEANS CALCULATTON OF
EXPERIMENTAL GROUP AND CONTROL GROUP
OI{ THE FIRST TR.EATMENT
.THE BRAVE MOUNTAIN CLIMBER'

D@ERIMENTALGROLN
(GROTJPA)

59.5
78
66
84
79
89.5
89
77.5
77
73.5
70.5
78.5
59.5
89.5
77.5
82

7r.5
77
57
60.5

3s40.2s
6084
4356
70s6
6241
8010.25
7921
6006.25
s929
5402.2s
4970.25
6162.2s
3540.25
8010.25
6006.2s
6724
5112.25
5929
3249
3660.25
tt3909.7s

CONTROLGROUP
( G R O U PD )

62
74.5
60.5
67
69
76.5
83
67.25
68
70.5
67
54
74.5
52.5
66.5
66
70.5
67
74.5
68

3844
55s0.25
3660.2s
4489
4761
5852.2s
6889
4556.25
4624
4970.25
4489
2916
5550.25
2756.25
4422.25
4356
4970.25
4489
5550.25
4624

93319.5

TEST OF IIYPOTHESES:
there

1.Ho:mA=mDr
groups .
Ha:mA>DD,
group.
.,

J.

between

mean score of A group is

where df.
t-test,
t (0'05) = 1,125
Calculation

is no difference

for

= nA + nD -

t observation

the

greater

mean

than

D

2 = 38
(to)

of

the First

Treatment:

A : EXPERIMENT

Ex

= 741825

x

n=20

n

= 10,08943559
D

= CONTROL

>x

= 67 ,95

I

n=20

(lx)"
7,t6516

xA-xD

to =

= | ,16t17 6O

n (A-1)s'A + (nlt-1)s'o
nA+nD-2
4 . CONCLUSI ON :

(-

I

1
+-)
nA

= |,7617760 > t

B ec a u se ,/t
rejected.

observat ion,/

Hence $e
significant

a 0,05
that
at
conc lude
di fference between grouPs.

nD
(0,05)
I eve I

so

Ho

there

1S

is

MEANS CALCULATION BASED
ON TITE CONTENT ACIIIEVEHENT
OF TEE FIRST TREATIIIENT
"TIIE BRAVE IIOI'NTAIN CLItr{BER"
NO.

EXPERIMENTALGROUP
( G R O U PA )

x
1
2
3
4
s
6
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16

t7
18

19
20

J(=

x2

25,5
22,5
2l ,5
26
25
2 6, 5
26
2 3, 5
25
24
22,5
25,5
19
27,5
2 6, 5
26
2 6, 5
23,5
27,S
18,5

650, 25
506,25
462,25
676
625
70 2 , 2 5
676
55 2 , 2 5
625
5?6
506, 25
650, 25
361
7 56,25
70 2 , 2 5
616
70 2 , 2 5
552,25
75 6 r 2 5
342,25

488, 5

12056,25

24 ,425

CONTROLGROUP
( G R O U PD )

x

2t
22,5
l9
20,5
22
26
27
25
22
24
19,5
16,5
2t,5
18,5
2 0, 5
22
24
19
2 2, 5
22
435

X = 2t,75

x2

44t
506,25
351
4 2 0, 2 5
484
675
729
625
484
576
380,25
2 75 , 2 5
462,25
342,25
420,25
484
576
361
506,25
484
9591

TEST OF HYPOTHESES:
mean
between the
Dr there is no difference
1. Ho : mA =
groups.
greater
than D
Ha : mA > mD, mean score of A group is
group.
2.

= nA + nB -

where df.
t-test,
= 1,725
(
0
'
0
5
)
t
Calculation
Treatment's

2 = 38
(to)

observation
t
for
Content Achievement:

of

the

First

A : EXPERIMENT

tx
x

= 24,425

=-

n=20

n

= 2,56t224
D

= CONTROL

x

=-

tx

= 2L,75

n=20

n

(Ex)"
= 2,613225

xA-xD

= 3 ' 2693718

to=
n (A-1)s"A

+ (nD-1)stD

nA+nD-2

I
(-+
nA

C O N C L UISO N :
=3,2693718>t
observat ion/
B e c a u s e , /t
rejected.
a 0'05
that
at
Hence we conc I ude
di fference between groups.
significant

1

-)
ND

(0,05) so
level

llo

there

is
is

ilEANS CALCULATION BASED
TEE
ORGANTZATIONACEIEVEI{ENT
O}I
OF THE FTRST TREATMENT
"THE BRAVE }IOT,NTAIN CLItr{BER"
NO.

EXPERIMENTALGROUP

(cRouPA)

x
1
2
J

4
)
6
I

8
9
10
11
l2
13
L4
15
16
t7
18
19
20

X=

x2

CONTROLGROUP

(cRouPD)

x

18,5
20
t2 ,5
18
16,5
20
20
t7
19,5
15
t6
15,5
18,5
19,5
t7
18
t2,5
L7
L2r5
9

342,25
400
1 5 6 ,2 5
324
272,25
400
400
289
342,25
225
256
240,25
342,25
342,25
289
324
156,25
289
156,25
8l

15,5
15
14
l4
12,5
18
t7
t8
12,5
t4,5
t4
10,5
15
10
16
16
14,5
14,5
15,5
1 2, 5

330,5

s627,25

2 8 9, 5

16,525

L4 r475

x2

240,25
225
t96
196
1 5 6 ,2 5
324
289
324
t56,25
2t0..25
196
110,25
225
100
256
256
2lo,2s

zto,25
240,25
t56 ,25

4277,25

TEST OF ITYPOTHESES:
mean
between the
1. Ho : mA = mB, there is no difference
groups.
D
Ha : mA > mD' mean score of A group is greater than
groups.
2.

where df . = nA+nD-2=38
t-test,
= l'725
(
0
,
0
5
)
t
(to)
for
t observation
Calculation
o
f
a
c
h
i
e
v
e
m
e
n
t
t
h
e
f
irst
oreanizat ion

on
based
treatment:

the

A : EXPERIMENT

x

=-

2x

= 16r525

n=20

n
(Ex)'

-- 2,953477

= CONTROL

Ex
x

= 14,475

n=20

n

= 2,136617

;

to =
n (A-1)s'A

a-io

+ (nB-l)s'zD

nA+nD-2

= 2, 5150

11
nA

+-)
nIJ

C O N C L UISO N :
observation/ = 2,5150 > t (0'05) so llo
B e c a u s e , /t
.
rejecteal
there
a 0,05 I eve I
that
at
conclude
Hence we
d i fference between groups .
significant

ls

is

MEANS CALCULATION OF
EXPERIMENTAL GROUP AND CONTROL GROTJP
ON THE SECOND TREATMENT
.WAITING FORA BUS"

EXPERIMENTAL GROUP
(GROUPA)

89.5
87.s
86
t)

74

72.s
7l
74.5
72
88
72
84
96.5
94.5
77.5
94-5
68
96.5
81.5
9'l

8010.25
7656.2s
7396
5329
5476
5256.2s
5041
55s0.25
5r84
7744
5184
7056
9312.2s
8930.25
6006.25
8930.25
4624
9312.2s
6&2.25
9409

CONTROLGROUP

(cRouPD)

80.5
58
57
86
90

82.s
79.s
66.5
17.5
76.5
83
76
71.5
82
67.5
70
79.5
66
70.5
84.5

6480.25
3364
3249
7396
8100
6806.25
6320.25
4422.25
6006.25
s852.25
6889
5776
5112.25
6724
4556.25
4900
6320.25
4356
4970.25
7t40.25
l14740.75

TEST OF IIYPOTHESES:
mean
between the
1. Ho : mA = mD, there is no difference
groups .
greater
than D
Ha : mA > mDr D€ED score of A group is
group.
whete df.
2. t-test,
t (0'05) = 1,725
3. Calculation
Lr.ga9m-41:

for

= nA + nD t

2 = 38
(to)

observation

of

the

Second

A : EXPERIMENT

x

=-

lx

n=20

= 82t5

n

(Ex)'
= 10,064267

D

= CONTROL
2x

x

= 75,225

n=2Q

n
(Ex),

= t,01 49366

xA-xD

to =
n (A-l)s"A

+ (nD-l)s2D

nA+nD-2

= 2,4008205
I

(-+
nA

-)

I

nD

4 . C O N C L UISO N :
Because,/t observat ion,/ = 2,4008205 > t ( 0 ,05) so Ho
rejected.
there
level
that
at
a 0,05
conclude
Hence we
g
r
o
u
p
s
.
between
difference
significant

is
is

IIEANS CALCULATION BASED
ON TEB CONTENT ACHIEVEMENT
OF THE SECOND TREATI{ENT
"wAITING FOR A BUS"
NO.

x
1
2
3
4
)
6
7
8
9
10
11
I2
13
l4
15

t6
t1
18
t9
20

CONTROLGROUP
( G R O U PD )

EXPERIMENTALGROUP
( G R O U PA )

27
26,5
29
2 1, 5
24
22,5
22
22,5
2 3, 5
2 8, 5
25,5
2 5, 5
27
29
29
29
2 3, 5
29,5
27,5
2 9, 5
522
X = 26,1

x

x2

729
702,25
841
462,25
576
506, 25
484
506, 25
552,25
812,25
650,25
650,25
729
841
841
841
552,25
870,25
7 56,25
870'-25

t 3 7 73
[=

F.

24,5
24
2 5, 5
27
18
18
2t
22,5
2 7, 5
t6
26,5
t7
t8
29,5
22,5
2l ,5
23,5
24
2 6, 5
23,5

600,25
576
650,25
729
324
324
441
5 0 5 ,2 5
756,25
256
702,25
289
324
812,25
506,25
462,25
55 2 , 2 5
576
70 6 , 2 5
552,25

455,5

1064l ,7 5

2 2 , 1 15

TEST OF IIYPOTITESES:
mean
between the
1. Ho : mA = mD, there is no difference
groups.
greater
D
than
Ha : mA > mDr mean score of A group is

grouP.

2. t-test, where df.
t (0'05) = 1,725

= nA + nD - 2 = 38
(to)

t
observation
for
3. Calculation
t
C
o
n
te
n
t
T r e a t m en t s
A ch i e veoen!:

of

the

Second

A : EXPERIMENT

tx
x

= 26rt

11--20

n

= 2,798496

D

= CONTROL

x

=-

>x

= 2 2 , 7 75

n=20

n

= 3 ,153858

xA-xD

to =
n (A-1)s'A

= 3,175825

+ (nO-1)s'D

nA+n3-2

I
(nA

I

+-)
nD

C O N C L UISO N :
Because,/t observat ion,/ = 3, 175825 > t (0,05)
rejected.
0 ,05
level
that
at
a
Hence we conc lude
g
r
o
u
p
s
b
e
t
w
e
e
n
d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e
significant

so

Ho

there

is
is

MEANS CALCULATION BASED
ON THE ORGANIZATION ACITIEVEHBNT
OF THE SECOND TREATHENT
"WAITING FoR A BUs"
EXPERIMENTALGROUP

NO.

(cRouPA)

x
1
2
J

4
)
6
7
8
9
10
11
t2
13
t4
15
L6
t7
18
t9
2A

f=

x2

19,5
20
20
18,5
l6
18,5
18
13,5
20
16,5
15,5
18
19
20
18,5
18,5
15,5
19,5
19,5
20

3 8 0 ,2 5
400
400
342,25
256
342,25
324
182,25
400
2 72 , 2 5
240,25
324
361
400
342,25
342,25
240,25
380,25
380,25
400

364,5

6?09,?5

t8,225

CONTROLGROUP
( G R O U PD )

x
11,5
12,5
13,5
15,5
15
t2
13
t2
18
15
13
L 2, 5
15
1 7, 5
L2,5
10,5
12,5
13,5
L 7, 5
16,5
219

1 3, 9 5

xl

| 3 2, 2 5
156,25
t82,25
240,25
225
144
t69
L44
324
225
169
t56,25
225
306,25
156,25
110,25
L 5 6, 2 5
182,25
3 0 6 ,2 5
2 72 , 2 5
3982

TEST OF HYPOTIIESES:
l . Ho : rnA = mD, there is no difference
between the
mean
groups.
Ha : mA > mD, nean scote of A group is greater
than D
group.
2.

= nA + nD -

t-test,
where df.
t (0'05) = 1,725

2 = 38

3. Calculation
for t observation (to) based on
achievement of the second treatment:

organization

A : EXPERIMENT

>x

x

= 18r255

n
n E x'
=/

- (Ex)'
= 1,874t673

n (n - 1)

"

D

= CONTROL

x

=-

n=20

>x

= 13,95

n=20

n
(Ex)'

= z,t1 s824

xA-xD

to :
n (R-1)s'A

+ (nD-1)s3D

nA+nD-2

= l0 ' 36866

11
(-+-)
nA

C O N C L UISO N :
observat ion,/ = 10, 36866 > t
Because/t
rej ected.
a 0,05
that at
Hence we conc lude
groups.
b
e
t
w
e
e
n
di fference
significant

nD
(0,05)
level

so

Ho

there

is
is

MEANS CALCULATION OF
DOERINTENTAL GROUP AND CONTROL GROTJP
ON THE THIRD TREATMENT
.CATCHING A TIIIEF"

E)GERIMENTAL GROUP
( GROL'PA)

89
87
96.5
72.5
70.5
74.5
60
68.5
67
74.5
67.5
88.5
96
97.5
88
95.5
7l
92.5
91.5
95.5

7921
7569
9312.25
5256.25
4970.25
5550.25
3600
4692.25
4489
55s0.25
4556,25
7832.25
92t6
9506.25
7744
9120.25
5041
8556.25
8372.2s
9120.25
t37975.25

x =82.175

CONTROLGROUP
( G R O U PD )

67
66
69.5
75.5
74.5
63
63
64.5
87.5
72.5
68
64.s
77
86.5
69.5

63.s
67.5
79.5
84.5

83.s

4489
4356
4830.25
5700.2s
5550.25
3969
3969
4160.25
7656.25
5256.25
4624
4160.25
5929
7482.2s
4830.25
4032.25
4556.25
6320.25
7t40.2s
6972.25
105983.5

TEST OF HYPOTHESES;
between the
nean
1. Ho : mA = nD, there is no di fference
groups .
greater
than D
Ha : mA > mB, mean score of A group is

group.

2. t-test, where df.
t (0'05) = Lt725

= nA + nD - 2 = 38

3. ealcuaatiqn for t observation (to)

of the Third Treatment:

A : EXPERIMENT

x

)x

= 82't75

=-

n=20

n

= L2,398291

o

= CONTROL

x

=-

Ex

= 72r35

n--20

n
(Ex)'
= 8,2495614

xA-

xD

:

to =

n (e-1)s'A + (nD-l )s'D
nA+nD-2

3, 1231590

I

I

+-)

(nA

nD

C O N C L UISO N :
3,123159 > t (0,05)
Because,/t observat ion/
rejected.
that
a 0 ,05 level
conc lude
at
Hence we
d i fference between groups
significant

so

Ho

there

is
is

}IEANS CALCT'LATION BASED
ON THE CONTENT ACHIEVEMENT
OF TIIE THIRD TREATIiENT
"CATCHING A TEIEFN
NO.

EXPERIMENTALGROUP
( G R O U PA )

x
I
2
J

5
6
7
8
9
10
11
t2
t3
L4
15
t6
l7
18
19
20

2 7, 5
27
29,5
2t,5
23,5
2 4, 5
2l
2l
19,5
2 5, 5
26,5
29
30
30
28,5
30
24
28,5
29
30
526

x -- 26,3

x'
75 6 , 2 5
729
870,25
462,25
552,25
600,25
441
441
380,25
650,25
102,25
841
900
900
8t2,25
900
576
812,25
841
900
14061,5

CONTROLGROUP
( G R O U PD )

x
2 0, 5
2 2, 5
2l
2 2, 5
26,5
18
1?,5
2l
2 5, 5
24
20,5
19,5
23,5
28
2 0, 5
19
20
2 7, 5
2 4, 5
26
446

x -- 22,3

x2

420,25
420,25
441
306,25
702,25
324
306,25

44r

650,25
376
42O..25
380,25
352,25
784
420,25
361
400
73 6, 2 5
600,25
676
10138

TEST OF IIYPOTITESES:
the
mean
betveen
1. Ho : nA = mD, there is no difference
groups.
greater
than D
Ha : mA > mD, mean score of A group is

group.

2. t-test, where df.
t (0'05) = t,725
3. calculation
Treatnent's

= nA + n; - 2 = 38

t
observation
for
Content Achievement :

(to)

of

the

Third

A : EXPERIMENT

x

Xx

n=20

= 2613

=n

= 3'507136
= CONTROL

x

Ex

n=20

= 2213

=n

(zx),

xA-

= 3, 180533

XD

= 3 '78475

to =
n (A-1)s'A

+ (nL-1)s2D

nA+nD-2
A

11
(-+-)
nA

C O N C L UISO N :
3,78475 > t
observation,/
B e c a u s e , /t
rejected.
at
a 0,05
that
conc lude
Hence we
g
roups .
b
e
t
w
e
e
n
d i fference
significant

nC
(0,05 )
I eve I

so

Ho

there

is
ls

MEANS CALCULATION BASED
ON TEE ORGANIZATIONACHIEVEMENT
OF TEE TIIIRD TREATMENT
"CATCHING A THIEF"
NO.

EXPERIMENTALGROUP

(cRouPA)

x
1

a
J

5
6
8
9
10
11
t2
13
l4
15
t6
t7
18
19
20

l8
19
16,5
16
18
20
18
18,5
16
t9
13,5
20
18,5
19
18,5
19
t4
20
19,5
19
350
X=18

x'
3 24
361
2 72 , 2 5
2 56
3 24
400
3 24
342,25
256
361
L82,25
400
342..25
361
342,25
361
t96
400
380,25
361
5 5 4 6 ,5

CONTROLGROUP
( G R O U PD )

x

x2

16,5
10,5
11
1?'5
19
17,5
18,5
13
14,5
15
l1
15
13
18
13,5
l4
t7 ,5
13r5
14
l1

2 1 2, 2 5
110,25
t2t
306,25
361
306,25
342,25
t69
2L0,25
225
289
225
159
324
182,25
L96
306,25
182,25
r96
289

305,5

4782,25

X = 15,275

TEST OF EYPOTHESES:
l.

mean
between the
Ho : mA = mi, there is no difference
groups.
than D
Ha ; mA > mD' nean score of A group is greater

group.

= nA + nD - 2 = 38

where df.
2, t-test'
t (0,05) = 1,725

(to)
based
for
t observation
3. Calculation
t
r
e
a
t
m
ent:
oreanizat ion achievenent of the third

on

the

A : E X P E R IME N T
Xx
x

= 18

=-

rr= 20

n
(2x)'
= 1,87083
= CONTROL

>x
x

15,275

=-

n=20

n

n E x? -

(Ex)t

n (n -

= 2,468Q86
1)

xA-

to =
n (A-1)stA

xD

+ (nD-l)s'D

nA+nD-2

= 3 '93496
I
nA

C O N C L UISO N :
observat ion,/ = 3,93496 > t
B e c a u s e , /t
rejected.
at
a 0,05
Hence we conclude that
d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e
b
e
t
w
e
e
n
.
significant

I
l.

+-)
n!
( 0,05 )

so

level

there

Ho

ls

is

MEANSCALCUII\TION OF
EXPERIMENTALGROT]PAND CONTROLGROUPON THE POSTTEST
"lrfY MOST EXCITING DAY'

E)GERIMENTAL CROUP
( GROUPA)

83
83.5
96
76.5
67.5
68
68.5
7A
77.5
93.5
8l
81.5
90.5
95
95
94
77.5
96
87.5
93

CONTROLGROUP
( GROUPD)

6889
6972.s
9216
s852.25
4556.25
4624
4692.2s
4900
6006.25
8742.25
6 s6 l
6642.25
8 1 9 0 .5
902s
9025
8836
6006.2s
9216
7656.25
8649

82.s

6l
78
69.s
76
88
54
9l
67
70.5
90
75.5
78
8l
84
89
80

6806.2s
5256.25
6642.25
3906.25
3721
6084
4830.25
5776
7744
29t6
8281
4489
4970.2s
8100
5700.25
6084
6561
7056
7921
6400

142257.5

1 5 3I . 5

t19244.7

72.5
81.5

62.s

X= 76.575

TEST OF HYPOTHESES:
mean
between the
1. Ho : mA = [tE, there is no difference
groups.
greater
than D
mean score of A group is
Ha:mA)tni'
group.
j

where df.
t-test'
t (0,05) = 1,725
Calculation

= nA + nD - 2 = 38

for t observation (to)

of the Post Test:

A : EXPERIMENT

Ex

= 83,75

x

n=20

= 10' 198684
F

= CONTROL

x

=-

Ex

-- 16 ,575

n

n=20

(Ex)'
= 10, 182893

xA-xO

to =
n (A-l)stA

+ (nD-l)s'D

nA+nD-2

= 2,2264552
1
(-+
nA

C O N C L UISO N :
observat ion,/ = 2,2264552 > t
B e c a u s e , /t
rejected.
that
at
a 0,05
Hence we
conc lude
between groups.
difference
significant

I
-)
nD
(0,05 )so
level

Ho
there

is
is

MEANS CALCULATION BASED
ON THE CONTENT ACEIEVETENT
OF THE POST TEST
"MY MoST EXCITING DAY"
NO.

x
I
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
1l

t2

l3
l4
15
16
T7
18
19
20

CONTROLGROUP
( G R O U PD )

EXPERIMENTALGROUP
( G R O U PA )

2 8, 5
2 7, 5
28
2 0, 5
24,5
22,5
22
22
22
26
24
28,5
2 9, 5
2 9, 5
28
28,5
24
2 9, 5
2 1, S
28,5

52r
26,05

x

x1

8L2,25
756,25
784
420,25
600,25
506, 25
484
484
484
676
576
8t2,25
870,25
870,25
784
812,25
576
8 70 , 2 5
756,25
812,25

24 r5
22
2l
25r5
26,5
21,5
27

2t
2 2, 5
22
2 7, 5
26
23
2 7, 5
19,5
2l ,5
2 4r s
18,5
20,5
27

t 3 74 7

475
)(=

23,75

xz

600,25
484
441
650,25
702,25
1 5 6, 2 5
729
441
506,25
484
75 6 r 2 5
676
529
756,25
3 8 0, 2 5
462,25
6 0 0, 2 5
342,25
42O,25
729
1t446

TBST OF IIYPOTHESES:
1. Ho : mA = nD, there is no difference
between the
mean
gfoups.
greater
H a : m A > rn D , me a n sco re o f A g r o u p i s
than D
group.
2. t-test, where df.
t (0'05) = l'725

= nA + nD - 2 = 38
of the post Test

3. Calculation for t observation (to)
on the Content Achievement:

Based

A : EXPERIMENT

x

=-

lx

= 26,05

\=20

n

(Ex)"
= 3 ,0344513
'.

= CONTROL

x

=-

Ex

= 23r75

n

n=20

= 2,944665

xA-xD

to =
n (A-l)s2A

+ (nD-1)s"D

nA+nB-2

= 2,43260tO
ll

(-+-)
nA

CONCLUS
I ON:
= 2,4326Q10 > t
B e c a u se / t
observat ion/
rejected.
Hence we
conc I ude
that
at
a 0,05
significant
d i fference between groups.

nD
(0,05)
leve l

so

Ho

there

is
ls

MEANS CALCULATION BASBD
ON THE ORGANIZATION ACBIEVEilENT
OF THE POST TEST
"MY MosT EXCITING DAYN
NO.

x
I
,'
3
4
J

6
7
8
9
10
l1

t2
13
L4
1l

16
L7
l8
19
20

CONTROLGROUP
( G R O U PD )

EXPERIMENTALGROUP
( G R O U PA )

L7
l7
20
L7,5
18,5
16,5
14,5
20
19,5
19,5
19,5
l7 ,5
20
19,5
18,5
20
16,5
19,5
18,5
16,5
366
X = 1813

x

x2

289
289
400
3 0 6| 2 5
342,25
2 72 , 2 5
z t O, 2 5
400
380,25
380,25
3 8 0, 2 5
306,25
400
380,25
342,25
400
2 72 , 2 5
380,25
342,25
272,25
6745,5
)(=

x2

18
L4
18
t7
t2 ,5
13
l3
l6
18,5
10,5
18
15,5
14,5
18
15
1 ?' 5
t7
19
18
16,5

324
196
324
289
156,25
169
169
256
342,25
110,25
324
240,25
2t0,25
324
225
3 0 6, 2 5
289
361
324
2 72 , 2 5

3t 9 , 5

5211,?5

l5 ,975

TEST OF HYPOTHESES:
nean
1. Ho : mA = mD, there is no difference between the
groups .
than D
Ha : nA > mDr ttterlll s c o r e o f A g r o u p i s g r e a t e r

group.

2. t-test, where df.
t (0'05) = 1,725
3. Calculation
orsanization

for

= nA + nD - 2 = 38
t

observation

(to)

based

the

on

achievement of Post Test:

A : EXPERIMENT

x

=-

Ex

= 18r3

n=20

n

= 1,58446
D

= CONTROL

x

=-

>x

= 15,975

n=20

n

= 2,38126

to =

xA-xi
n (A-1)s2A + (nD-l)s2D
nA+nD-2

= 3,63525
I
(-+
nA

C O N C L UISO N :
Becauser/t observat ion,/ = 3,63525 > t
rejected.
conclude
that at a 0,05
Hence we
significant
difference
between groups.

1
-)
nD
(0,05)
level

so

Ho

there

ls

is

'

t s L c o l . t P o s l ' r I oPl tn o P l L E
.TOpl.c

.DAT{I.

STUDZIIT
'
r c€a.! L!r/zr, cstrrntt'

. .rlrj.J!lr.
. t l i t t L i fi f i j r i r l o j r r r r
lrf vllrl cpalFtaerl1tj..ll.
b.t_.,
Ergfl&tE
o talr.rl
L rrrlt..d
!.? I t
iJrrti
I
I
r
a
.
i
{
.
t
.
r
\
b
,
r
.
t
l
.
!
.
r
t
l
.
l
i
.
.
l
l
.
'
r
l
r
9
l
q
r
r
r
l
t
t
q
f
E
a
a
b
o
r
l
r
.
t
r
l l . t t tioco W
o rorUT trlrvrtt. to tG?1., l^|t 1..1, Jotrtl
t.at o, \lrrlr
tltU.
.!:t. tr rc. | | nl a.+rr t.
.l . u ) r r c ! .
lrwl.al..
ilE
t€ tao4l llrl!..,
{rvd orrret a, lrtt..
a roq t.rtl...l
t€ar I Jorr rr: rlqr l.lant r.Jl e o f r r l J r a l . D 3 . . . ' l b . t r . ! l r r
" I l ' 1 1 Ittt
. ol rtt lrr|tl
tP rrrlnrto
.
ll.tl

IE
IH
ffi
H

i rr;rr

lC-tl
lt-ll

tl.lc rAti ri-lsiir
r..$l.5a l t t
r'rrf tqitt

f.t

t t ot f tt' { l J rr

T

^iii.ll,irrr

. tiur

afa alt.l3F.ot
f..a ra! tcirritrlGttr

oci(urrd oi ttrooirratrd r lrtr

o lo

ti Vfi t o a a 0 t td } htrl t.rt

orlrrltrtlan

r or.o!

rrrgr I rr(.otl v.

t-l

rr-tt
,l-lt

a roritDt
II tt lrtt..l c at ttaI t r

lJtcrr,

a,tl I

.6GJlb to rvrlrrir

raord/t{l crr ctotc' r r r,l

rcrfSrr,l
or clrr qrr orl
rt r a t. D
. . D l l I l l r t t rr rrrr. .l .l . ! t s n

uqr{ to.r

I

loltll

. r l ? r o e r l r t . rt (r 4 l r tr .rtr
f t r l r tr r r t . r t
. .. urrti t to,d
. G o € r r lt o lrrrtl r r r o r r o l 9 o r ,{ / l l l o r
e tl r1l 1
a. t r ! ! .
lt-tl
O } S O t O t v lf ltjj!a' t I a d t $
r r . t . L u l! r 9$-rltrD; t r o li (r lA. .rral rrr a
l!.t!
tu:r tO to{lt lltlt.a
r.al. I t3..f\r.!! .s?o.r ol v o r d / l d l t r r ( o . r .
. ttrllr tacylrdgr ol trlllrl
I cl rct rrcrrth tc .v.lt.t.
I

3c r r . c l o l o r ,
olclG.,

r.tl.

rGrrbrltrt.

l! Ci(tlJvt !e. Yrrl O|.at rllrnflvr-earyt11-q31l1rrrGrloo
. a v J . r r c r t r l t' ,' r' .L-q. r . , l r
r t r J r r r r r r l r t t t . v c l a t t a t t l a ! o r ! l o co, c , . i frll!!1l t . .,
!t ., 6. o. a. q! .r. o. . r rper rcrpr rot rr lt rel ror i i
g.rt rlrylr
ooP t{t rYffrg!
3l(.attv.
ooo.rFrcil;o r rlolr'l.'J!"..
tr ocrpi.r
a

!€gllruoBtOl

tavatal

attot,

!f

lrtr{di!t.

t.r...

.ur\ar.

rr-r{

ira^,rru.-rl^-

t r - ! l i...s i-- .rfit r.ler tfcc.er. rt. rlrl.tra€oDtrt.cqoltt{otlo'|
| ttr.t{r!t
rrtart !l
l.t.ttoi,
ttrocrrt!1 t.!r.,
tutb.r. Vorl ciJrr/luocrlon. r?ttotrrr' lijoo,tii.'
o a. tl lta a a t r t a l a t t t a s . a r l r , r l , a - o r . , lar.ttr. it l o rni r. . r . .. a. t ! t
aso
t tr.9
o aaoolfrrr rr rdd o
! f r . -t tl .r6. a
J rr lrtL r

ra-t
t
I.

';

:r.-r 1p91 l! lttt Ogrt
r lJ.r. rtrrrtt
ftr i rrpr.r,tq.
rtrtdrreFto.t.l
. ltAlorl rrlrrao!r9 | ocAertrr
tuoctio! a urlt-cttr!llrd
r toorrly orlrrtrsl
€a'o to lt(llgt
| .G.ryLrt rlrfn'
tnrt .rlr
la.a. r!ti/
l.Lrt lrdorrl. Lr -l kt.qilii
tlylt rJ .upt&\tld:tt..

.! ':!,1.{
rcorrNo!too ..ir., r r."ri,tJ
l=!_F1l1
a a c"!rll,_t!!
lrr.r,
. a r c g o - c n r r t r t . r ! . . - !{'..rLTo.
o|t rot jLry.fLr"..v.tutt.

ttc.
Elc.*lllt

N

llttl

CO00t a.rolltrrtrt

!rrtirt

cf Gorvratloor I l r l

rrto?t

ii.

o(

l r . !l ll tl a
lpr 1
r ryi jr ir1r L, !t b
a ioo e
gt tt i - DDuunnrrsguurrtl ll cc ii .r .rlrttlluulll' rbrrttlloo !! ..
c! ?
aaQ
Qp
p ltg
l g l v tt+
l l EFtl t 9
r i oorr
rr o
o .6cc. l.lt oto
l rlltl rrri
ro
ott rpi
- i t.ti i l ' r-eur
> . D r r . ' o l u .tto r . € . p l t . | | | t ! 1 o . .
prrrlrrpblrj

L
r tl r. t t r p t co rl r. .c.ce\!l{rrr...aJ
Duutl l r .r a
t.r.lraDDlrt
I tlll
!g.t\OOra,r.$rrrt r.rretr .f rprlll,rl, ?...!u.tlo,rr orrttrl(r.!ltvl,
.
r . . r r I c i ' c o rt u r . d o r r g r o s r r l
poir trrrlvelilrt
,. tlrrO.rp\l!t
f -. . .Yf al tt ll .>
D-9+
l ::g
-t :!r-l rt lr r a
l
l
a
a
v
o
l
t
g
n
v
r
t
l
o r r !r- r a< .nli rrl !lr!.rrrtr..c.td L
.
l
l
.
s
f
r
l
e
n
v
r
r
t
l
o
n
b
D te
t .r' r. ri^o' . rt -o t( tr l1. rt tl rt l! 1
r ,1 ,
(t -|I:t I g I I I t |I |t It o tt ,, t U
"C
. o ^r ' i o r
Uiicct rt |tr|trt rot. or .. r . t rt rrt tCCrr rr D
t ll ll !!{t . l r. r. ddvr ,t ritr!l lona! t ll llr.l a
l Ut ri ri r
.r

ro:tl& Seotl

.rattL

t.

rvr lg r i.

RE'IOEI(

col{,'l.Elrrg

THE EXPERIMENTRESULTS BASED ON THE WRITING ASSIGNIiIENTS
llurber

TRTATIEIIT
{t)

0l

Itudents
I

(0 (

L

td

I
7
8
q

l0
il
t1

tl
tl
l5
l6
l1

t8
t9

t0

(

11
?l'5
?0'5
?8'J
59,J
e 0{

??,J
82
?t,5
77
57
50,5
119
6,5

t:

lJ {0,25
508(
{il6
?056
6211
t0l0,2J
1921
6006
,25
59X9
5{02,25
f9?0,25
6162tli
l J{ 0 , 1 5
t 0 l 02, 5
6006,
25

66
tl
19
8 9, 5
t1

I

6t2r

(llt
at
)LlatLJ

59X9
1219
1660
,l5

89,J
8 ?, 5
86
,J

11

tt (
tLtJ

?t
?{'J
1X
88

?1,t25

(ilr)

I

I'

8 0 1205,
?656,25
1396
5329
J{?6

89
6'

96,5
72,5
?0'J
sx95,25 ? f ' 5
50{t
50
5 J J 0 , 2 56 8J,

5t8|
t?{ {
?{'J
tt
Jt8{
6?'5
7056
tf
t8,5
9 6 , 5 9112
96
tls
9 { , 5 8910r15 9 ? ' J
5005,15 8 8
9 15,
t910,25 9 J , J
Dd
t52l
II
9 6 , 5 9l12t25
9X,5
8 1, 5
66{2,25 9 1 , 5
0( (
97
9109

l l ] 9 0 9 , ? 5t650
8X,5

1180{9
,5

PostTtsT

TREITTEl|T

(lrl

I'

I

I

TTEAITEIIT

l 6 { l,J
82tt15

t'

I

1921
dJ
1569
8 1, 5
9112,25 96
J256,25 6t
t9?0,2J ?6'5
5550,25 6 t, 5
I600
6 8, 5
1692,25
rt I
If89
55Jo,25 91,5
{556,25
il
?8t2,2J
8l,J
9Xt6
90,5
9506,25 95
17tl
95
9 ll o, 2 5 9 {
5 0I{
71tt
8556,25 96
8 l?1 , 2 1 8 ?' l
9120,3593
111915
tli

t67J
81,?5

ll

6889
69?2,5
91,t5
1621
1852,2J
{JJ6,2J
1691,15
{ 900
6006,25
81t2,15
656t
66t2,25
r 5,
8l9o
902J
9025
UIJO

6006,
25

9u6

?6l5,ll
t6{9
il225?,5

TEE CONTROL RESULTS BASED ON THE TRITING

ilErtrilt

IlrIet
of
!trd i rtr

t'

I

5l
?l'5
50,!

I
I
!

,
t
I
t0

69
15,5
l,
6?,J
6t

t15l
5t52,25
6Et9
t!J6,15
t52l
1970,2'
fft9
79t6
J5J0,lJ
2755,13
((? 2 , 1 !
(JJ6
{9?0,25
ilt9
55J0,lJ
{61{

JI
?r,!
J2,I
t6,l
55
?0'l

It

l{
tl

t5
l?

ls'

It

t{,5
5t

tq

10

lEll
l SJo,l5
J560,25

{rtt

0,

n

I

nt

to,t

ll

lNrTttn
(llll

iltrililt
(III

(rl

(t

t!

90

u ,J

?9,5
56,1
7?'l
?6,J
tt

5|l0,11
Jl5f
12t'
?195
tt00
6805,15
6120,25

u2,,1t

6l,l
?0
?9'J

5005,lJ
5t5l,:5
68t9
J??5
5lll,l5
5121
{356,
i!
f900
6J20,1J

to,J
lf,J

l 97 0,l J
?1t0,25

,D

?I,J
t2

{r56

6?
!!

69,1
7J,5
?t,J
6t
5t
5l,J
lt,J
tt

t.

6?,9J

i .

75,12!

t :

I

6t
5{,5
1l
t6,!
69,5

6r ,t

5?'5
?9'l
t{,5
t!,5

I t 5 9 lrt : 9llt9,5 I r : l 5 0rl5 l r t : l l l ? { 0 , ?lr : lllT
l.

P0sttill
t'

I

l0,t
JI

ASSTGNMENTS

tt

I

t{tI
{356
tEr0,15
5700,25
5!50,2J
t959
ttnt

f t 60,2t
76!5,2J
JtJ6,2J
{521
il60,!J
lt2t
?{u,2J
t$0,lJ
t0ll,15
tJJ5,l5
5r20,lJ
?l{0,25
69?1,2!

ll,J
?2,5
,!

?t

6t!5

6t
69,J
,!

tt
5{
,l
T'

?0'J
90
15,3
?t
il
E{
tt
l0

6t05,2J
J2J6,?5
55t1,2t
60tI
1906,15
t?1t
{tJ0,2J
Jtt6
??r
I
19l6

t2tr

||t9
{9t0,15
tr00
3t00,lJ
50t{
6551
t0t6
1911
6t00

h t : l 0 ! 9 t t , 5l r : 1 5 ! 1 , 5 l r t : l l 9 1 { t , ? J

?1,!5

t !

75,57J

Thc Findings Basedon thc Writing Assignmcn6
TITLES

TECHN.

X

SD

t-table

obtained+

The BraveMountain
Climber@irst Tr.)

PS
LV

74.825 10.0E9436
67.95 7 .1 6 5 1 6

t.725

1.761?760

Waiting for a Bus
(SecondTreatment)

PS
LV

82.5
10.064267
7

Dokumen yang terkait

The analysis of intralingual errors in descriptive paragraph writings made by the fourth semester students who take writing III course at the English education program of the faculty of teacher training and education of the University of Jember in the 200

0 6 72

The effect of giving homework on structure achievement of the second year students of MAN Jember in the 2000/2001 academic year

0 2 82

The effect of making a summary on reading comprehension achievement of the second year students of SMU 1 Rambipuji in the 2001-2002 academic year

0 3 62

The effect of pocket chart on e\writing achievement of the first year students of SLTP Negeri I Gondanglegi-Malang in the 2000/2001 academic year

0 3 100

The effect of teaching english songs on vocabulary achievement of the fourth year students of SDN Tamansari I Bondowoso in the 2001/2002 academic year

0 3 85

The effect of using the flannel boad on grammar abilities of the second year students of SLTPN I Paiton in the 2001/2002 academic year

0 5 78

The effect of using picture series on students’ reading comprehension of narative text: a quasi-experimental study at the second year students of Islamic School Al-Falah Villa Mutiara-Ciputat.

0 10 109

Analysis of Academic Application Acceptance Widya Mandala Catholic University Surabaya Using Method Unified Theory Of Acceptance And Use Of Technology (UTAUT)

0 1 6

The implementation of teaching writing recount text by using picture series at the tenth graders of Madrasah Aliyah Muslimat NU Palangka Raya - Digital Library IAIN Palangka Raya

1 0 20

The implementation of teaching writing recount text by using picture series at the tenth graders of Madrasah Aliyah Muslimat NU Palangka Raya - Digital Library IAIN Palangka Raya

0 0 23