A study of intrapersonal and interpersonal conflicts of darby shaw in john grisham`s the pelican brief - USD Repository

PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI

  A STUDY OF INTRAPERSONAL AND INTERPERSONAL CONFLICTS OF DARBY SHAW IN JOHN GRISHAM’S THE PELICAN BRIEF A THESIS

  Presented as partial Fulfillment of the Requirements To obtain the Sarjana Pendidikan Degree in English Language Education.

  By Dodik Prianggo Dono Saliro Student Number: 01 1214 103 ENGLISH LANGUAGE EDUCATION STUDY PROGRAMME DEPARTMENT OF LANGUAGE AND ARTS EDUCATION FACULTY OF TEACHER TRAINING AND EDUCATION SANATA DHARMA UNIVERSITY YOGYAKARTA

PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI

PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI

PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI

PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI

PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI

PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI

  

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

  First of all, I would like to thank God for blessing me through my life. I have finally finished this study.

  My deepest gratitude is expressed to my major sponsor, Drs. L. Bambang

  

Hendarto Y, M.Hum, for giving his valuable time during his busy days to correct

  and discuss my paper. I thank him for his patience, support, suggestion, and valuable criticism in guiding me to complete this study.

  I would also like to thank all the lecturers of English Education Study Program of Sanata Dharma University for sharing their knowledge during my study.

  I also thank the secretary and library staffs for their good services and friendliness.

  With lots of love, I dedicate this paper to my wonderful family. I am sincerely grateful to my beloved parents Bapak Ignatius Sudradjad and Ibu

  

Iswanti Wiryo Suprapto, for their endless love, prayers, and supports in my life,

  especially in my study. I am sorry for taking a long time to finish my study. I also thank my lovely brothers and sister, Irwan Febriantoro, Kunanti, and Androeigo

  

Mardhotilla for their support, and love. For My Beloved Grandpa and Grandma,

Alm. S. Wiryo Suprapto and Partinah Wiryo Suprapto, The big family of

Wiryo Suprapto, Yohanes Daryanta and Family, Atmo Martono’s Family.

  My special thanks so to my beloved girlfriend, the one and only, Martina

  

Asri Sasongko Irmawati for always being there for me, for her love, support and

patience and for all the beautiful and sad times we have spent together.

PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI

  

Coly”, Rismanto ‘Texex’, Lintang, Nanda, ‘Lambhe, Tommy, Bonchu, Doni,

Gowest, Bebe Belgiano, The Bangirejoez, Heineken F.C. I thank them for their

  endless, happiest and craziest friendship. My appreciation also goes to my friends in PBI: ‘Memex’, Noo-chie , Reny, Rara, Ukhe, Nophie, Ratri, Ale, Catur, Henry,

  

Kris and etc. I am honored to have such friends as them. I am so blessed to have

friends like them. Knowing them makes my life more colorful.

  I would like to thank my SPD’s team, The Incredibles, my Play Performance’s group, AVANTASIA, and also my PPL 2 and KKN’s friends for sharing experiences and time with me.

  Last but not least, I would like to thank those whose names are not mentioned on this page. I thank them for their contribution, support and prayer to me.

  Dodik Prianggo DS

  PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI

PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI

  TABLE OF CONTENTS

TITLE PAGE ................................................................................................... i

PAGES OF APPROVAL ................................................................................. ii

STATEMENT OF WORK’S ORIGINALITY .............................................. iv

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ............................................................................. v

TABLE OF CONTENTS ................................................................................. vii

ABSTRACT ...................................................................................................... ix

ABSTRAK .......................................................................................................... x

  

CHAPTER I. INTRODUCTION .................................................................... 1

  

1.1 Background of the Study ........................................................................ 1

  

1.2 Problem Formulation............................................................................... 4

  

1.3 Objectives of the Study............................................................................ 4

  

1.4 Benefits of the Study .............................................................................. 4

  

1.5 Definition of Terms ................................................................................ 5

  

CHAPTER II. REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE ........................... 6

  

2.1 Review on Related Theories ...................................................................... 6

  

2.1.1 Character and Characterization ......................................................... 6

  2.1.1.1 Definitions of Character ................................................................ 6

  2.1.1.1. Types of Characters ............................................................ 7

  2.1.1.2 Characterization ............................................................................. 8

  2.1.2 Critical Approach .............................................................................. 11

  

2.1.3 Conflict .............................................................................................. 12

  2.1.3.1 Psychological Theories of Conflict ............................................... 12

  2.1.3.2 Kinds of Conflict ........................................................................... 13

  2.1.3.3 Conflict Resolution ........................................................................ 14

  2.1.3.3.1 Private Decision Making by Parties......................................... 14

  2.1.3.3.2 Private Third-Party Decision Making ...................................... 16

  PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI

PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI

  2.1.3.3.3 Extralegal Approach................................................................. 16

  

2.2 Theoretical Framework ............................................................................. 17

  

CHAPTER III. METHODOLOGY ............................................................... 19

  

3.1 Subject Matter ........................................................................................... 19

  

3.2 Approach .................................................................................................... 20

  

3.3 Methods of the study ................................................................................. 21

  

CHAPTER IV. ANALYSIS ............................................................................ 23

  

4.1 Darby Shaw’s Characterization.................................................................. 23

  4.1.1 Beautiful ........................................................................................... 23

  4.1.2 Clever ............................................................................................... 25

  4.1.3 Brave ................................................................................................ 27

  

4.1.4 Diligent ............................................................................................. 28

  4.1.1 Caring ............................................................................................... 30

  

4.2 Darby Shaw’s Conflicts and Resolutions.................................................. 32

  4.2.1 Intra-personal Conflicts .................................................................... 32

  4.2.1.1 Conflict on Thomas Callahan’s Death ....................................... 33

  4.2.1.2 On the car Explosion .................................................................. 35

  4.2.1.3 Believing in Grantham ............................................................... 37

  4.2.1.4 In Solving the Case .................................................................... 39

  4.2.2 Interpersonal Conflicts ..................................................................... 41

  4.2.2.1 Against Callahan ........................................................................ 41

  4.2.2.2 Against the Killer ....................................................................... 43

  4.2.2.3 Against FBI ................................................................................ 45

  4.2.2.1 Against Grantham ...................................................................... 46

  

CHAPTER V. CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTION .................................. 48

A. Conclusion ............................................................................................. 48 B. Suggestion .............................................................................................. 50

  PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI

PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI

  2. Suggestion for Teaching English Using Literature ........................... 51

BIBLIOGRAPHY ............................................................................................ 53

APPENDICES .................................................................................................. 54

APPENDIX 1. Lesson Plan for Teaching Speaking Using The Pelican Brief . 55

APPENDIX 2. Material for Teaching Speaking Using The Pelican Brief ....... 57

APPENDIX 3. The Summary of The Pelican Brief.......................................... 60

APPENDIX 4. Biography of John Grisham ..................................................... 62

APPENDIX 5 John Grisham’s Booklists......................................................... 65

PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI

  

ABSTRACT

  Prianggo, Dodik. 2008. A Study of Intrapersonal and Interpersonal conflicts of

  

Darby Shaw in John Grisham’s The Pelican Brief. Yogyakarta: English Language

Education Study Program, Sanata Dharma University.

  This thesis analyzes a twenty four-year-old beautiful and diligent woman named Darby Shaw, who is the main character of John Grisham’s novel entitled The Pelican Brief. She faces both intrapersonal and interpersonal conflicts and tries hard to solve them. In the beginning of the story two Supreme Court Justices, Rosenberg and Jensen, are murdered. Darby Shaw, who is clever, starts an investigation in different libraries for some days and opens file about her theory why Rosenberg and Jensen are killed. Her theory is completely true.

  This thesis aims (1) to describe Darby Shaw’s characteristics, and (2) Darby Shaw’s solve both intrapersonal and interpersonal conflicts she faces. There were two kinds of sources used, namely, primary and secondary sources. The primary source was the novel, The Pelican Brief. Some relevant references such as psychological theories, literary theories and theory of critical approach were the secondary sources. Those theories were used to analyze the novel. The psychological approach was applied, because it was the most appropriate one to observe the main character’s personality in this novel.

  Based on the analysis of this study, Darby Shaw is described as beautiful, clever, brave and diligent woman. She wants to prove to everybody that the president of FBI, named Mattiece, is the actor behind the all tragedy. Darby Shaw is experiences various intra-personal conflicts. The conflicts are on believing in Thomas Callahan’s death, on the car explosion, believing Grantham and in solving the case. Darby Shaw experiences many interpersonal conflicts. They are conflict between Darby Shaw and outside powers such as Callahan, the killer, FBI, and Grantham. She can solve them all. She mostly uses negotiation method to solve her intra-personal conflict.

  Although Darby Shaw experiences many conflicts, she can resolve them because she is a clever. In resolving her conflicts, she uses negotiation, and mediation process.

PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI

  

ABSTRAK

  Prianggo, Dodik. 2008. A Study of Intrapersonal and Interpersonal conflicts of

  

Darby Shaw in John Grisham’s The Pelican Brief. Yogyakarta: Program Studi

Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris. Universitas Sanata Dharma. Yogyakarta.

  Tesis ini mendiskusikan tentang wanita cantik dan rajin yang berusia 24 tahun bernama Darby Shaw. Tak lain adalah tokoh utama dalam novel John Grisham yang berjudul The Pelican Brief. Dia menghadapi dua konflik sekaligus yakni intrapersonal dan interpersonal dan berusaha keras untuk menyelesaikannya. Di awal cerita terjadi pembunuhan dua mahkamah agung, Rosenberg dan Jensen. Darby shaw untuk memulai pemeriksaan di perpustakaan yang berbeda untuk beberapa hari dan membuka file tentang mengapa rosenberg dan Jensen dibunuh. Teori yang didapatnya ternyata tepat.

  Tujuan dari tesis ini (1) menggambarkan Darby shaw's karakteristik, dan (2) memecahkan kedua konflik, intrapersonal dan interpersonal. Ada dua jenis sumber yang digunakan, Sumber utama dan sumber kedua. Sumber utama novel, "Pelican

  

Brief ". Beberapa referensi seperti teori psikologi, Teori literatur dan Teori “critical

  approach”. Teori itu digunakan dalam menganalisa novel. Teori yang digunakan adalah teori tentang psikologi karena teori ini yang sangat penting untuk menganalisa kejiwaan dari tokoh utama dalam novel ini.

  Berdasarkan analisis ini, Darby Shaw digambarkan sebagai wanita cantik, pintar, berani dan rajin. Dia ingin membuktikan ke setiap orang bahwa presiden FBI, Bernama Mattiece, adalah aktor di belakang semua tragedi pembunuhan. Darby mengalami berbagai macam konflik intrapersonal. Konflik itu adalah kematian Thomas Callaghan dalam ledakan mobil, mempercayai Grantham dalam pemecahan masalah. Darby juga mengalami benyak konflik interpersonal, yaitu konflik dirinya dengan Callahan, the killer, FBI, and Grantham. Dia dapat memecahkan itu semua. Kebanyakan Darby menggunakan cara negosiasi dalam memecahkan semua persoalan itu.

  Meskipun Darby Shaw mengalami berbagai macam konflik, dia dapat menyelesaikannya semua karena dia pintar dan cekatan. Dalam pemecahan semua masalah dia menggunakan proses negosiasi dan mediasi.

PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI

CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION This chapter consists of five parts. Those are background of the study, problem

  

formulation, and objectives of the study, benefits and definition of terms. The first

  

part is background of the study, which discusses the reasons of why I chose the topic

of this study and the need for analyzing the topic. The second part is problem

formulation, which expresses the general description of the problems that would be

analyzed in this thesis. The third part states the objectives of the study that explains

the goals of the study. The fourth part describes the benefits of the study and the last

  

part is the definition of terms. In this part, some key words which are related to the

study would be defined based on valid references.

1.1 Background of the Study

  Everybody knows that human cannot live alone. Everybody needs to interact

with other people. In order to be able to survive with his or her lives, everybody

needs someone else. However, every condition may lead to the fact that everybody

might encounter problems when building relations with others. As we know, in

social interaction someone is experiencing may cause her to have conflict within

herself and with the other people.

  According to Redman (1964, 363), conflicts can be divided into two types;

they are intrapersonal and interpersonal conflicts. First, intrapersonal conflict is a

conflict that arises within one self. Second, interpersonal conflict is a conflict that

PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI

  2

arises between someone and the power outside the character. We often have a

conflict that comes from us and outside, because situation creates us with the power

to gain our goal. Even though sometimes we cannot reach that goal, it may create

conflicts.

  An intrapersonal conflict usually happens because of the failure of doing

something. So, self evaluation, is needed when we have an intrapersonal conflict.

  

With self evaluation we can know how to achieve the goals based on our capability

and if we only have motivation but we forget our own potential, the process to

achieve the goals will be not effective.

  We live in the world and we always interact with other people who are

unique in personality and have different point of view, reaction, or response in facing

problem. Thus interpersonal conflict may happen when we try to interact or

communicate with people around us because they have their own habits and opinions

that may be against what we have, and the result is we will solve conflicts in our life.

  According to Little (1982, 2) a novel as one of the literary works that can reflect

human’s life such as human conflicts. We can assume that literary work is the

expression of reality because it reflects human’s problem. It can describe how people

overcome or solve the problems or their conflicts in their life. Based on that fact, it is

interesting to discuss a novel entitled The Pelican Brief, because we can see many

conflicts that the main character faces; both interpersonal and intrapersonal.

  This novel tells about 24 year old beautiful and diligent woman named Darby

Shaw. In the beginning of the story two Supreme Court Justice, Rosenberg and

Jensen, are murdered. Darby Shaw who is clever enough starts an investigation in

PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI

  3

different libraries for some days and opens a file about her theory why Rosenberg

and Jensen are killed. Her theory is completely true.

  Darby Shaw writes a brief named "Pelican Brief" and shows the document to

Thomas Callahan. The man who can take the "Pelican Brief" brings it to the FBI, the

CIA and of course the White House. The president now has to restructure the Court

because of Rosenberg’s and Jensen's death. Mattiece, the president of FBI, becomes

aware of the "Pelican Brief" and decides to kill everyone who is involved in it to

keep his plans secretly. He hires a killer "Khamel", who also kills the two Supreme

Court Justices, to kill Darby Shaw and Thomas Callahan. Callahan is killed in a car

explosion. Darby is very suspicious because she knows that Thomas murderers

follow her.

  Darby Shaw runs away and phones Gray Grantham, a reporter, to help her to

make a list of people who have contributed the President’s campaign three years

before. The situation forces her to be a strong and clever, because if Darby is not

strong and clever the problem cannot be solved as soon as possible. She decides to

ask Gray Grantham for help to go to the office of the Washington Post where Gray

writes his story. After that contact Denton Voyles, Mattiece's lawyers and the White

House. The White House decides to tell everyone what Mattiece has done and denies

any connection between Mattiece and the President. FBI Director helps Darby to

leave the country unknown. Darby and Gray are safe at the island of St.Thomas.

  The Pelican Brief is an interesting novel to discuss because there are lots of

conflicts that the main character faces. The way she deals with conflicts which come

from within her and the people around her are interesting to analyze. That is why, I

PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI

  4

want to analyze her intrapersonal and interpersonal conflicts in this novel and how

she deals with the conflicts.

1.2 Problem Formulation

  The problems of this study are formulated as follows:

  1. How is the main character, Darby Shaw, described?

  

2. How does Darby Shaw solve both intrapersonal and interpersonal conflicts?

  1.3 Objectives of the Study The objectives of the study are formulated as follows: 1. To find out the characteristics of the main character that described in the novel.

  2. To find the conflict that Darby Shaw faces and to analyze how she deals with the conflicts

  1.4 Benefits of the Study The benefits of the study are formulated as follows; First, I hope with this study

can help the readers understand the characters and kind of the conflicts are resolved.

  

In my opinion, this novel is good for literary analysis. Second, I expect that the result

of this writing will be useful for teaching literature and this study can be used as a

reference to introduce the students to some of the elements of the novel such as the

characters and their conflicts.

PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI

  5

1.5 Definitions of Terms

  To analyze this novel, there are four terms to define. These are character,

conflict, intrapersonal conflict and interpersonal conflict. To make the discussion

become easier, each will be described.

   1.5.1 Character According to Abrams (1981, 20) characters are persons or characteristics of

the figures that are presented in dramatic or narrative work, which are taken by the

reader of being capable with moral and character qualities and that are expressed in

the dialogue and the action. It means that characteristic of the character is the

important thing in the novel.

   1.5.2 Conflict According to Laurence Perrine (1974, 44) conflict means a clash of action, ideas,

and desires or wills between two characters or among the people in the society. In

this study, the main character is facing many problem both intrapersonal and

interpersonal conflicts.

  1.5.3 Intrapersonal Conflict and Interpersonal Conflict Stephen Worchel and Joel Cooper (1974, 499) define intrapersonal conflict as a

conflict within the individual. The terms in this study refer to the above definition.

  

While, interpersonal conflict refers to a conflict that can involve a competition

between two or more individuals in reaching a goal or it can involve a disagreement

as to the means for reaching a goal.

PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI

CHAPTER 2 REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE This chapter presents a review of related literature. It consists of the theory of

  

character and characterization, the theory of conflict and the theory of conflict

resolution.

2.1 Review on related theories

  This section is used as a basis to analyze the novel. It consists of the theory of

character and theory of characterization, which help to find out the description of the

main character. The theory of critical approach is also an important element in this

section to make a better understanding on the work of literature.

2.1.1 Character and Characterization

2.1.1.1 Definitions of Character

  A novel contains many characters. The characters are presented by the author

with physical or psychological appearances and through their behaviors and ways of

thinking to make them like ordinary human beings. Stanton (1965, 17) states that a

character is a person who does the action in a story. From the character itself the

readers can enjoy the development of the story from beginning to the end. Fictional

character of a story will lead the readers to imagine or may experience the course and

the emotional aspects of the story through their action and their dialogues.

PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI

  7 Abrams (1981, 20) defines characters as people established in a literary work

that have “moral and dispositional qualities that are expressed in what they say –the

dialogue-and what they do –the action”. He also adds that the character in the novel

has similar disposition with the real human beings that can be found on their moral

and temperaments, which become the base or the reason of their actions and their

discourse. The characters in the literary works are created as living characters in the

fictional world.

2.1.1.1.1 Types of characters

  According to Milligan (1983, 155) character can be categorized into two

kinds based on their roles in a story, namely major and minor characters. The story

usually focuses on a major character because she/ he is the center of the story.

Whereas a minor character is character that appears only once or twice in the story

and their roles are less important than the major character. A major character in the

novel performs an important role, so the readers’ expectation depends on it. The

minor characters are those who appear in a certain setting, just necessarily to become

the background of the major characters. Their role is less important (Milligan 1983,

55)

  According to Foster in Abrams (1981, 85), there are two types of characters

that can be found in literature. Firstly type is “flat or simple character” that is built

around “a single idea or quality” and presented without much individualizing details.

Flat characters generally have a dominant characteristic and are not developed.

PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI

  8 Because they are not central to the plot, they do not change or grow. The term stock character is used to refer the characters that perform in repeating situations.

  Secondly, a round or complex character is the one who is complex in

temperament and motivation and is represented with subtle particularly. Such a

character is difficult to describe with any adequacy as a person in real life and like

real people. Round characters are more complex, many sided and life like than the

flat characters. Round characters are also complex and difficult to understand as

individual living people. Abrams (1981, 20) states that to some degree a round

characters posses many individual and unpredictable human traits. They may be

considered as dynamic; that is, they demonstrate their capacity to change or to grow.

  Furthermore, a major character could be static or dynamic. A static character

is the one who changes little or not at all. Meanwhile, a dynamic character is a

character that undergoes any changes. The circumstance where the character lives

gives significant influences on their personality development.

2.1.1.2 Characterization

  Sometimes a character cannot easily be understood if we do not know what

characteristics inside the character are. To help us understand a character in details,

we have to know how the author characterizes them. It is important to understand the

process of revealing the character in order to figure out the description of the main

character. Character and characterization are tightly connected and they cannot be

separated. Characterization is a process by which an author creates a character

(Rohberger and Woods. Jr. 1971, 20). Therefore, to understand the character well,

PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI

  9

readers have to read the whole story and draw a conclusion from that. The author

usually just presents a brief description of the character. The rest is given to the

readers to increase their imagination about the character through the story.

  According to Perrine, to be convincing, characterization must also observe

three principles (1974, 69). The first principle is consistency in behavior that is

characters must not behave one way on one occasion and a different way on another

unless there is a clearly sufficient reason for the changes. The second is motivation;

characters should be motivated in whatever they do especially when there is any

change in their behavior. Readers must be able to understand the reason for what

they do if not immediately or at least by the end of the story. The last principle is

plausibility; characters must be plausible or lifelike. They must be relevant to the

readers. Characters must have some traits which are the same as those of human

beings in the real world.

  According to Murphy (1972, 161-173), there are nine ways of how an author

may reveal the characters’ personality. These methods will give significant

contribution to the readers in understanding the characters through characterization.

Those methods are personal descriptions, character as seen by another, speech, past

life, conversation of others, reactions, direct comments, thoughts, and mannerisms.

  The first is personal descriptions in which the author can describe a person’s

character from the appearance and clothes. The description is focused in our mind’s

eye and what is the physical appearance we see.

PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI

  10 The second method is character as seen by another. Using this method the

author describes a person/ character through the eyes and opinions of other

characters in the novel.

  The third method is speech. In this method the author can describe the

character through what that person says. Sometimes one’s characteristics can be

clearly seen through their words.

  The forth method is past life. The author can give us a clue to describe the

character through their past life events that have helped to shape that person’s

character.

  The fifth method is about conversation of others. Using this method the

author describes someone’s character through what they are talking about the person.

  The sixth method is the character’s reactions in facing a problem became

people may have various ways to solves. Different people may have different ways.

  From their reactions, we will also get some clues to describe a character.

  The seventh method is direct comments. In this method; the author describes

or gives comment on a person’s character directly so that it would be very easy for

the reader to get the image of the character.

  The eighth method is thoughts. The author lets the readers know the

character’s personality by stating explicitly what is in the character’s mind or what

the character is thinking about. The readers are led to the mental process of the

character that conveys the idea.

PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI

  11 The last method is mannerisms. The author can describe the character’s

behavior and also his habits either the positive or the negative ones. From his or her

habits and behavior, the readers can know the reflection of his personality.

2.1.2 Critical approach

  According Rohberger and Woods Jr. (1971, 6-15), the theory of critical

approach involves five approaches. The first approach is the formalist approach; this

approach tries to examine the literature work reference to the fact of the author’s life

without reference to the genre of the work or its place in the development of the

genre or literary history, and without reference to its social milieu.

  The second approach is the biographical approach; this approach will guide

the readers to tries learning as much as they understand about the author’s life and

the development of the author.

  The third approach is the sociocultural-historical approach; it takes us to

analyze a novel based on the civilization that produces the novel. Civilization is

defined as the attitude and actions of a specific group of people. The subject matter

of the novel itself is their attitudes and actions.

  The forth is about the mythopoeic approach. Applying this approach the

readers analyze a novel by trying to discover certain universally recurrent patterns or

a human thought, which is found first expression in ancient myth and folk rites and

also basic to human thought that they have meaning for all characters. The last

approach is the psychological approach; the psychological approach brings us to

analyze the novel from psychological aspects.

PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI

  12

2.1.3 Conflict

  Conflict is something very common in our life. Almost everyday we experience

conflicts. Perrine (1974, 44) describes conflict as “a clash of action, ideas, desire, or

wills between two individuals or people in the society that can include, physical,

mental, emotional, or moral. “ While Kalish (1973, 450) states that conflict is a type

of stress as a result of two or more different needs. The satisfaction of one need leads

to the non satisfaction of another need, or the satisfaction of one need brings

unpleasant consequences.

  A novel as a reflection of human life experiences shows conflict in it. Meredith

and Fitzgerald (1972, 27) states “conflict is something which is unpleasant which has

happened or to be experienced by the character, and if the character has a free choice

to choose, he will not choose it”.

2.1.3.1 Psychological theories of conflict

  Atkinson and Hillgard (1983, 424) state that a major source of frustration is

conflict between two opposing motives. When two motives are in conflict, the

satisfaction of one leads to the frustration of the order. There are two kinds of

conflicts which could be happen in our daily life. Atkinson and Hillgard (1983, 424)

also state this in their book: Sometimes conflicts arise between a motive and a person’s internal standards rather than between two external goals. An individual’s desires may conflict with his or her standards of acceptable social behavior. Achievement motives may conflict with individual standards of helpful and cooperative; to succeed may require competing with – or even undermining collogues and associates (1983, 424)

PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI

  13 They also state that conflicts between motives and internal standards often can be more difficult to resolve than between external goals.

  For example, words and sentences which are said by a man can influence

another man’s feeling and mind, whether he is happy or being hurt. If they cause a

conflict and it cannot be solved, third –party (mediator) is needed to help (Lim and

Corneval, 1990, 373). When the bad communications may lead a conflict, a good and

intense communication can be used as the media to resolve the differences among the

people who have the conflicts.

2.1.3.2 Kinds of Conflict

  Worchel and Cooper (1979, 460) use different terms in defining kinds of

conflicts. First is intrapersonal conflict. It is a conflict that arises within one

character. Second is interpersonal conflict it is a conflict that arises between the

characters with the power outside the character. They use the term intrapersonal

conflict to mean internal conflict and the term interpersonal conflict to mean external

conflict. Discussing further about intrapersonal conflict, they categorize this conflict

into four types.

  The first kind of conflict is approach-approach. This kind of conflict will

happen when someone is motivated to reach two positive goals or ambition but only

can attain one. This is a simple conflict that everyone usually faces, because an

individual only has to choose one goal from many equally attracting things.

  The second is avoidance-avoidance. This type of conflict usually happens

when someone must choose one goal from two unattractive goals. This conflict is

PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI

  14

difficult to resolve, since whenever he gets more pay attention to one negative goal

and the force to avoid those goals increases. The best way to resolve this type of

conflict is to get out from situation and refresh.

  The third is approach-avoidance. This kind of conflict involves only one goal,

which has both attractive and unattractive aspects associated with it. This conflict is

rather difficult to resolve as the individual’s own desire to both obtain the goal and

escape from it trap human.

  The last is double approach-avoidance. This type of conflict can involve

having to choose between two goals, each of which has positive and negative

aspects, or having to choose whether to approach or to avoid a goal that has two

positive and two negative aspects.

2.1.3.3 Conflict Resolution

  Everybody that has a conflict can generally resolve their dispute by a variety

of means. Conflict can arise in relationship easily. Every body who has a conflict

does not want to stay inside the conflict in for a long time. They want to solve their

conflicts as soon as possible in order to continue their peaceful life. In this analysis,

there are many ways to resolve the conflict. According to Moore (1999, 23) those

four continuums can be the strategy to resolve the conflict. Those are private

decision-making by parties, private third-party decision-making, legal authoritative

third-party decision making and extralegal coerced decision-making.

PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI

  15

2.1.3.3.1 Private Decision Making by Parties

  Private decision making by parties is explained into four ways. First is

avoidance, sometimes people prefer to interact with other with certain condition, or

they feel what it has less potential of conflict. They realize that there is something

important beneath it. They have the power to change the situation and believe that

the situation can be improved. Many people are likely to repress emotional reactions,

looking different view, or leave the situation totally.

  The second is informal problem-solving discussion. As we know when

avoidance is no longer possible and the pressure of the conflict grows stronger and

the parties have to solve the disagreements immediately. They can use informal

problem solving discussion to resolve their differences between the parties. The

consequence from these discussion is either the conflicts are resolved or less to the

satisfaction of the people that involved or dropped the conflicts immediately because

they are unable and do not have the capacity to make the resolution for it.

  The third is negotiation. This way is used by the parties to resolve of their

conflicts by communicating their interest between them. Negotiation is an option

which emotional degree and substantive polarization will make the process lead to a

conflict resolution.