THE STUDENTS' MASTERY OF POLYSEMY IN CONTEXT (A CASE STUDY : THE SECOND YEAR STUDENTS OF SMUK STELLA MARIS SURABAYA)
THE STUDENTS' MASTERY OF POLYSEMY
IN CONTEXT (A CASE STUDY : THE SECOND YEAR
STUDENTS OF SMUK STELLA MARIS SURABAYA)
A THESIS
In Partial Fulfillment of the Requiremelltl
for tbe Sarjaoa Pendidiho Depee in
Enclisll Lanpgc Teaching
By:
AGUmEN SRI TJANDRA
121309104,
UNIVERSITAS KAlOLIX WIDYA MANDALA SURABAYA
FAKULTAS JCEGURUAN DAN ILMU PENDIDIKAN
JURUSAN PENDIDIKAN BAHASA DAN SENI
PROGRAM STUDt PENDIDIKAN BAHASA INGGRIS
FEBRUARY, 1997
APPROVAL SHEET
(1)
IN
CC}NTE/T
SMUK STELLA MARIS SI!RABAYAl
-------·----------·
prepar-ed and
been
~.ubmi
tted by f:sGi tSTIEN SF: I
T·.J?'d'•JDF:A has
approved and accepted as partial fulfilment of
requirements
for
the Sarjana Pendidikan Degree
in
English Language Teaching by the following advisors.
DR
Veronica L. Diptoadi, Msc.
Fir-s:.t f:·,dvisor-
the
the
APPROVAL SHEET
{2)
________8 -------------·-
\
Drs. M.P. Soetrisno,MA
r Per-son
Ch~',.i
Drs. Hendra Tedjasuksmana,M.Hum
Tamah
Me!nber
(~
I
Memb~;-
DR. Veronica L. Diptoadi, Msc
r11:-.
Tr-aining College
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
First
of all, the writer would like to adore
for his blessing so that she can accomplish writing
God
this
thesis. It is impossible to finish it without his grace.
On
this occasion, the writer would also
like
to
express her deepest gratitude to :
1. DR.
Veronica L. Diptoadi, M.Sc., her
advisor
who
guided her patienly in
thesis
the
writing
process
of
accomplishing this thesis.
Petrlf~
2. Drz.
Marit~"
Ratidj-;:~!
the Headmast.er of
Sl"HJK
"St.ella
who has given permission to,carry out
St~ra\y,
this research in his school.
3. Drs.
Rochadi,
one of the English
teachers
of
SMUK
''Stella Maris'' Surabaya for his generosity in allowing
the writer to carry out this research in his class, as
well as for his suggestions and encouragement for this
study.
4. Drs. I Nyoman Arcana who has spent his t.ime in helping
her with the statie.tical computation for this study.
[;. The other lecturers loho have helped the writer
by
giving
valuable
suggestions
and
kindly
encouragement
during her thesis and her study at the university.
6. The
second year
Surabaya
who
students
supported
the
iii
._..,f
SMUK
writer
"Stella
Maris"
with their good
CO()peration
of
and willingness to become the
her
1
<
family
Her
and
e.ncouraged
7
.:~uported
during her study and this thesis writing,
Finally, the writer would like to thank all
whc~
have l::,een a
the
thesis
t~ig
would
help yet. unable to
name~
since
accomplished
never
The
iv
~-r
iter
those
them
it
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
APPROVAL SHEET (1)
i
APPROVAL SHEET (2)
ii
AC.KNOWLED;}Et1ENT5
~
, , , ........ , ...........
It
•
"
••••••
,
•
•
iii
TABLE OF CONTENTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
ABSTRACT
viii
I
CHAPTER
'I
II
INTRODUCTION
1.1. Background of the Study ........
1
1.2. Statement of the Problem .......
4
1. 3. Objective of the St.udy . . . . . . . . .
4
1. 4. Significance of t.be St.udy . . . . . .
5
1.5. Scope and Limitation ...........
5
1. 6. Assumption . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
6
1.7. Theoretical Framework
7
1.8. Definition of the Key Terms ....
8
1. 9. Organization of the Study . . . . . .
9
REVIEW OF THE RELATED LITERATURE
2.1. Role of Vocabulary Teaching
10
2. 2. p,_..,lysemy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
19
2.3. Error Analysis .................
24
2. 3. 1 Language Comp finizh the test. From the tezt, the writer could get
the e:tudente:" score ae: the data of their polye:emy ma;:;tery
level. The scores were then categorized into mae:tery
level as proposed by Drs. Moh. Uzer Usman and Dra. Lllis
Setiawati. If the studente: can answer t.he test > 94~i.
Crrectly, it meane: that
their maztery
is good or minimal : But when they can
only
answer < 75% correctly, it means they
have
inadequate mae:tery level.
The result from t.he test shverall was
inadequate ( 7Uq. This means that in
IN CONTEXT (A CASE STUDY : THE SECOND YEAR
STUDENTS OF SMUK STELLA MARIS SURABAYA)
A THESIS
In Partial Fulfillment of the Requiremelltl
for tbe Sarjaoa Pendidiho Depee in
Enclisll Lanpgc Teaching
By:
AGUmEN SRI TJANDRA
121309104,
UNIVERSITAS KAlOLIX WIDYA MANDALA SURABAYA
FAKULTAS JCEGURUAN DAN ILMU PENDIDIKAN
JURUSAN PENDIDIKAN BAHASA DAN SENI
PROGRAM STUDt PENDIDIKAN BAHASA INGGRIS
FEBRUARY, 1997
APPROVAL SHEET
(1)
IN
CC}NTE/T
SMUK STELLA MARIS SI!RABAYAl
-------·----------·
prepar-ed and
been
~.ubmi
tted by f:sGi tSTIEN SF: I
T·.J?'d'•JDF:A has
approved and accepted as partial fulfilment of
requirements
for
the Sarjana Pendidikan Degree
in
English Language Teaching by the following advisors.
DR
Veronica L. Diptoadi, Msc.
Fir-s:.t f:·,dvisor-
the
the
APPROVAL SHEET
{2)
________8 -------------·-
\
Drs. M.P. Soetrisno,MA
r Per-son
Ch~',.i
Drs. Hendra Tedjasuksmana,M.Hum
Tamah
Me!nber
(~
I
Memb~;-
DR. Veronica L. Diptoadi, Msc
r11:-.
Tr-aining College
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
First
of all, the writer would like to adore
for his blessing so that she can accomplish writing
God
this
thesis. It is impossible to finish it without his grace.
On
this occasion, the writer would also
like
to
express her deepest gratitude to :
1. DR.
Veronica L. Diptoadi, M.Sc., her
advisor
who
guided her patienly in
thesis
the
writing
process
of
accomplishing this thesis.
Petrlf~
2. Drz.
Marit~"
Ratidj-;:~!
the Headmast.er of
Sl"HJK
"St.ella
who has given permission to,carry out
St~ra\y,
this research in his school.
3. Drs.
Rochadi,
one of the English
teachers
of
SMUK
''Stella Maris'' Surabaya for his generosity in allowing
the writer to carry out this research in his class, as
well as for his suggestions and encouragement for this
study.
4. Drs. I Nyoman Arcana who has spent his t.ime in helping
her with the statie.tical computation for this study.
[;. The other lecturers loho have helped the writer
by
giving
valuable
suggestions
and
kindly
encouragement
during her thesis and her study at the university.
6. The
second year
Surabaya
who
students
supported
the
iii
._..,f
SMUK
writer
"Stella
Maris"
with their good
CO()peration
of
and willingness to become the
her
1
<
family
Her
and
e.ncouraged
7
.:~uported
during her study and this thesis writing,
Finally, the writer would like to thank all
whc~
have l::,een a
the
thesis
t~ig
would
help yet. unable to
name~
since
accomplished
never
The
iv
~-r
iter
those
them
it
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
APPROVAL SHEET (1)
i
APPROVAL SHEET (2)
ii
AC.KNOWLED;}Et1ENT5
~
, , , ........ , ...........
It
•
"
••••••
,
•
•
iii
TABLE OF CONTENTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
ABSTRACT
viii
I
CHAPTER
'I
II
INTRODUCTION
1.1. Background of the Study ........
1
1.2. Statement of the Problem .......
4
1. 3. Objective of the St.udy . . . . . . . . .
4
1. 4. Significance of t.be St.udy . . . . . .
5
1.5. Scope and Limitation ...........
5
1. 6. Assumption . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
6
1.7. Theoretical Framework
7
1.8. Definition of the Key Terms ....
8
1. 9. Organization of the Study . . . . . .
9
REVIEW OF THE RELATED LITERATURE
2.1. Role of Vocabulary Teaching
10
2. 2. p,_..,lysemy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
19
2.3. Error Analysis .................
24
2. 3. 1 Language Comp finizh the test. From the tezt, the writer could get
the e:tudente:" score ae: the data of their polye:emy ma;:;tery
level. The scores were then categorized into mae:tery
level as proposed by Drs. Moh. Uzer Usman and Dra. Lllis
Setiawati. If the studente: can answer t.he test > 94~i.
Crrectly, it meane: that
their maztery
is good or minimal : But when they can
only
answer < 75% correctly, it means they
have
inadequate mae:tery level.
The result from t.he test shverall was
inadequate ( 7Uq. This means that in