Challenges on Sustainable Coal Supply and Proposed Policy Hele Workshop 1

Challenges on Sustainable Coal Supply and Proposed Policy

HELE Coal Technology Workshop
World Coal Association
Jakarta, 6 September 2016

2

Disclaimer

The materials in this presentation have been prepared by APBI-ICMA (“APBI”).
These materials may contain statements that constitute forward-looking statements. These statements
include descriptions regarding the intent, belief or current expectations of either APBI, or those of other
third-party entities whose data sources have been published for public use, hence used in this
presentation. These statements can be recognized by the use of words such as “expects,” “plan,” “will,”
“estimates,” “projects,” “intends,” or words of similar meaning. Such forward-looking statements are not
guarantees of future performance and involve risks and uncertainties, and actual results may differ from
those in the forward-looking statements as a result of various factors and assumptions. APBI has no
obligation and does not undertake to revise forward-looking statements to reflect future events or
circumstances.
These materials are for information purposes only and do not constitute or form part of an offer, solicitation

or invitation of any offer, in any jurisdiction, nor should it or any part of it form the basis of, or be relied
upon in any connection with, any contract, commitment or investment decision whatsoever.

Agenda
1

Need for Electricity in Indonesia

2

35 GW Program & Coal’s Important Role

3

Coal Industry Overview & Challenges Faced

4

Proposed Policy Solution


Agenda
1

2

3

4

Need for Electricity in Indonesia

Indonesian Economy & Energy Demand
FORECAST

GDP Growth (%)
Electricity Consumption (TWh)
Electricity Consumption per Capita
(KWh)

0.3


500
3
450

0.25

4005

0.2

702

746

779

784

646

0.15
156

172

186

196

200

6.2%

6.0%

5.6%

5.0%

0.05


4.8%



2505

100
5
50

2012

2013

2014

2015

1,011


1,089

1,162

244

268

1,241

1,322

1,409
457
425

292

315


340

500
450

394

839

350
2
300

0

0

2011


932

366

400
350
300

217

200
1501

0.1



1,604
1,506


250
200

5.5%

7.1%

7.5%

8.0%

6.4%

6.4%

6.4%

6.4%

6.4%


6.4%

150
100
50

0

0
2016

2017

2018

2019

2020


2021

2022

2023

2024

2025

Energy plays fundamental part in economic growth process. Economic growth needs to
be supported by sufficient Electrification Ratio (ER)
Power consumption is related to productivity level of its population. As countries switch
to manufacturing-based economies, power consumption per capita increases

Source: PLN Business Plan (RUPTL) 2016 – 2025; Central Bureau of Statistics (BPS); Note: PLN is State Electricity Utility

Current Electricity Condition
Deficit
Alert
Normal

 As can be seen in graph above,
only small parts of Indonesia
actually have sufficient supply of
electricity
 PLN has traditionally been having
problems in providing electricity to
its customers, as shown by SAIDI
and SAIFI numbers
Sources: PELAYANAN TERPADU SATU PINTU (PTSP)
PUSAT KETENAGALISTRIKAN, Jakarta, 28 January 2015,
PLN 2015 Annual Report

7.26

6.96

6.82

5.76

5.97

5.81

5.58

5.31
4.9

4.71

4.22

3.85

2010

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
SAIDI = System Average
Interruption Duration Index

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
SAIFI = System Average
Interruption Frequency Index

2015

Growing Power Demand
As government pushes for infrastructure & industrial development, low electricity consumption
and installed capacity levels create significant upside potentials in electricity demand
ASEAN Electrification Ratio Comparables

Energy Consumption per Capita (KWh)

Target 2019: >95%

9,000

8,023

8,000
7,000

7,765

6,000
5,000

3,724

4,000

528

358

166

109

Myanmar

780

1,000

Cambodia

1,113

Laos

2,000

Phillipines

2,501

3,000

Indonesia

Vietnam

Thailand

Malaysia

Singapore

Brunei

-

 Indonesia is behind its ASEAN peers in Electrification Ratio (ER)
 Developed countries tend to have larger electricity consumption per capita
Source: PLN Investor Presentation May 2015, RUPTL 2016-2025, MEMR, World Bank, Indexmundi

Indonesian Electricity Development Progress
Installed Capacity excluding Rental Power
as of December 2015

Installed Capacity 2010 - 2015

Installed Capacity* 46 GW
41GW
31GW

34GW

43GW

46GW

15

20

25
23 GW

37GW

Gas-fired

Diesel
2011

10

Coal-fired

Hydro

2010

5

2012
PLN

2013
IPP

2014

14 GW
4 GW
2 GW

2015

Total

Others

2 GW

* Per 2015, excluding rental from 3rd party sources ~4 GW

Installed capacity of power plants increased
slowly at 6% CAGR over 2010-2015. PLN
installed capacity increased at 5% CAGR, while
IPP increased at 11% CAGR

Coal and gas are largest sources of energy for
electricity generation with highest total
installed capacity and at most economical price

Source: RUPTL 2016 – 2025; Note: IPP is Independent Power Producer

Agenda
1

2

3

4

35 GW Program & Coal’s Important Role

35 GW Electricity Plan
35 GW Power Projects

21%

60%

19%

Coal Fired Power
Plant (CFPP)

Gas & Steam
Power

Others

~20 GW

~7.5 GW

~6.5 GW

PLN

IPP

2 GW

18 GW

Project Costs
US$ 27 – 36 bln

DEBT
(Proj. Financing)
US$ 19 – 25 bln





EQUITY
US$ 8 – 11 bln

President Jokowi ‘s Administration committed to adding 35 GW new capacity to current installed capacity
of 46 GW to increase ER from currently ~88% to >95% by after 2019
~60% of total 35 GW power projects will come from CFPP & this 35 GW require significant participation
from private (IPP) at ~53% of project costs vs PLN’s portion of ~47% (inc. transmission)
IPPs (inc. CFPP) secure power purchase agreement (PPA) from PLN with typical tenor of 25-30 years

Source: RUPTL 2016-2025, internal calculations; Note: CFPP is Coal-fired power plant

35 GW Electricity Development Progress
Past Electricity Programs Failed to
Meet Expectations

35 GW
Progress
Government’s
35 GW
Program

RUPTL 2010 – 2019

30 GW additional capacity
planned

PPA
Signed

51 % realized
15 GW realized additional
capacity

31 GW

2010

34 GW 37 GW

2011

2012

Installed Capacity



41 GW

2013

43 GW 46 GW

2014

2015

COD

~0.2 GW

Under
Construction

~8.2 GW

Have Not
Started
Construction

~9.8 GW

Tender Process

~10.8 GW

Planning Process

~7.7 GW

Additional Capacity

Based on RUPTL 2010 – 2019, PLN
planned additional capacity of approx 30
GW for 2010 - 2015 but only realized 15
GW

Source: RUPTL 2016-2025, PLN presentation




Only 0.2 GW operational and 8.2 GW
under construction out of 35 GW planned
18 GW of power plant projects have not
secured PPA

CFPP Will Drive National Electricity
Planned Year-End Capacity
35 GW Electricity Program

2025 Installed Capacity Composition

Future Electricity Programs

140

126 GW

120

13%

113 GW

100

88 GW

80
60

11%

94 GW

104 GW
97 GW 100 GW

67 GW

50 GW

30%

46%

54 GW

40
20
0

27 GW 28 GW 31 GW 48 GW 53 GW 55 GW 55 GW 56 GW 56 GW 58 GW
2016

2017

2018

2019
CFPP

2020

2021

Others

2022

2023

2024

Gas

Coal

Others

2025

Total

Total installed capacity will grow by 10% CAGR in
next 10 years. CFPP installed capacity will grow by
11 % in same period
Source: RUPTL 2016-2025

Renewables

By 2025, CFPP will make up 46%
of all power plants in Indonesia

Forecast

Coal Requirement for CFPP
35 GW Electricity Program

Coal requirements for power (million tons)

55 GW 55 GW 56 GW
53 GW 54 GW

Installed coal-fired power plants (GW)

48 GW

26 GW 27 GW
20 GW

58 GW

31 GW

22 GW 23 GW

166

168

170

171

173

175

177

2019

2020

2021

2022

2023

2024

2025

15 GW 16 GW

11 GW

34

2010

45

53

55

2011

2012

2013

CAGR: 21%





70

2014

88

93

95

2015

2016

2017

109

2018

CAGR: 21%

Coal consumption has increased by 21% CAGR in past five years
It is expected to continue to increase by another 21% CAGR from 2016 until 2019, if 20
GW of new CFPP capacity from 35 GW program is installed according to plan
This assumes each MW requires 3500 - 4000 tons of coal p.a.
Source: PWC Report - Supplying and Financing Coal-Fired Power Plants in the 35 GW Program, RUPTL 2016 - 2025

Agenda
1

2

3

4

Coal Industry Overview & Challenges Faced

Indonesia’s Coal Reserve
MoMER Data

24
19

Coal Type
Low

Reserves
(billion ton)

%

GAR

9.2

28%

6,700

32.4

100%

Medium

Total



Data from MoMER as of 2012
suggests Indonesia has more than
sufficient reserves of 32.4 bn tons



Difficult to validate information, as
MoMER does not publish detailed
methodology and sources of data

PWC Survey
$97

120
100

39%
80

14
$59

60

9
40

29%
4

20
11.7

-1

2012
Mineable Reserves (billion tons)

8.3
2015
NEWC Coal Price



Based on PWC survey, mineable reserves in
2015 were reported at 8.3 bn tons, contrasting
MoMER figure of 32.4 bn tons



This was down by 29% from previously
reported JORC of 11.7 bn tons in 2012



Decrease in NEWC coal price has reduced
economically mineable reserves

Source: MoMER Strategic Plan (Renstra), PWC Report “Supplying and Financing Coal-Fired Power Plants in the 35 GW Program”

Falling Profitability & Investments
EBITDA fell 74% since 2011, from US$ 6.5 bn to US$ 1.6 bn in 2015



Capital expenditure (capex) dropped by 79% since 2012 from US$ 1.9 bn to US$ 0.4
bn by end 2015



Mining industry is expected to decrease capex by further 10-19 % in 2016; this may
be approaching the level where investment is not sustaining reserves each year

$ billion



10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0

140

$121

120
100

$97
$85

80

$71
$59

60
40

20
0
2011

2012
EBITDA

2013
Capex

2014
NEWC Price ($/ton)

Source: PWC Report “Supplying and Financing Coal-Fired Power Plants in the 35 GW Program”; Bloomberg

2015

Sterilization of Reserves


Average strip ratio (SR) has plunged from 9.6x in 2011 to around 6.6x in 2015. SR have
likely continued to fall in 2016



Mine plans are being modified, setting lower strip ratios and reducing reserves to be able
to return to profitability



This is likely to make future reserves more costly to extract, or even uneconomical to
extract, which can result in ‘sterilization’ of remaining reserves from mine plan

Industry Strip Ratio
14.0

12.0

2011 avg. =

10.0

9.6x

8.0

2015 avg. =

6.0

6.6x

4.0

2.0
Adaro

ITM

Bukit Asam

Harum
2011 SR

Source: PWC Report; Annual Reports

Bayan
2015 SR

Toba Bara

Baramulti

Atlas

Coal Consumption Forecast
Switch to imports
2015

2019

2024

2030

2050

DMO
(Power)

88

166

175

185

226

DMO
(Others)

2

74

78

82

101

Exports

313

160

140

116

36

Total

403

400

393

383

363

Coal Type

 By end-2019, coal consumption for DMO (power) is expected to reach 166 mn tons
 We should see steady increase in coal consumption for DMO (power) going
forward
 Coal consumption for 2016 – 2050 is forecasted to be in range of 350 – 400 million
tons per annum
Source: PWC Report; RJPMN (National Medium-Term Development Plan)

Uncertain Coal Supply

 Based on PWC’s March 2016 report, current proven coal reserves are at 8.3 bn tons
 Assuming coal reserves of 8.3 billion tons, with annual production forecast of 350400 mn tons at current coal prices, current coal reserves will run out by 2036

 This is less than 20 years into lifecycle of new CFPP (typically 25-30 years from
COD)
Source: PWC Report ; RJPMN

Agenda
1

2

3

4

Proposed Policy Solution

Cost Based Pricing Policy
Example of how it works?
Long-term cost-based price
contracts between coal
procurers (PLN and IPP) and
coal miners.

Positive effects of policy to miners

*
*

Price at which coal procurers
purchase coal (approx $36-38/ton)
Fixed margin
(20% - 25%)
Long-term
average
mining
cost
(approx
$30/ton)

*

Provide predictable and stable returns for miners

Recovery in investments, encourage life-of-mine
planning and stabilize economically mineable
reserves

Incentive to invest in IPP

Advantages to Government

*
*

Protects against increase in price of coal

Avoids domestic reserve crisis and need to import
coal and/or switch to more costly alternatives

Cost based pricing should not only be applied to mine-mouth CFPP but
to all forms of CFPP

Updates & Recommendation


On the recent update, the new minister of mines regulation No. 9/2016
sets out 15-25% range of margin that could be used by coal miners in
proposing coal sales price in Mine-Mouth Power Plant



Detail of cost as stipulated in the regulation should be reasonable.
However, PLN has been asking for review of the margin and cost detail,
which they consider too high



Government is working to find the best solution that would ensure the
reasonable margin for miners while benefiting PLN as the user for
sustainable coal supply



Extensive discussions with relevant government institutions on supply
sustainability to meet coal demand in 35 GW program must be
encouraged to create win-win solution for all stakeholders, including on
the viability of adopting cost plus margin method for all CFPP

THANK YOU