CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK APPLIED BY THE TEACHER IN TEACHING WRITING DESCRIPTIVE TEXT TO THE FIRST YEAR OF Corrective Feedback Applied By The Teacher In Teaching Writing Descriptive Text To The First Year Of SMP Negeri 2 Blora In 2014/2015 Academic Year.
CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK APPLIED BY THE TEACHER IN
TEACHING WRITING DESCRIPTIVE TEXT TO THE FIRST YEAR OF
SMP NEGERI 2 BLORA IN 2014/2015 ACADEMIC YEAR
RESEARCH PAPER
Submitted as a Partial Fulfillment of the Requirement for Getting Bachelor
Degree of Education in English Department
By
ANDHY SEPTHYAN NUGRAHA
A320110009
SCHOOL OF TEACHER TAINING AND EDUCATION
MUHAMMADIYAH UNIVERSITY OF SURAKARTA
2015
APPROVAL
CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK APPLIED BY THE TEACHER IN TEACHING
WRITING DESCRIPTIVE TEXT TO THE FIRST YEAR OF SMP NEGERI 2
BLORA IN 2014/2015 ACADEMIC YEAR
by
ANDHY SEPTHYAN N
A320110009
Approved to be Examined by Consultant:
First Consultant
Second Consultant
Aryati Prasetyarini, M.Pd
Nur Hidayat, M. Pd.
NIP. 725
NIK. 771
ii
ACCEPTANCE
CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK APPLIED BY THE TEACHER IN TEACHING
WRITING DESCRIPTIVE TEXT TO THE FIRST YEAR OF SMP NEGERI 2
BLORA IN 2014/2015 ACADEMIC YEAR
by
ANDHY SEPTYAN N
A320110009
Accepted and Approved by Board of Examiners School of Teacher Training and
Education Muhammadiyah University of Surakarta on August 8, 2015
Team of Examiners:
1. Aryati Prasetyarini, M.Pd.
(Chair Person)
(
)
2. Nur Hidayat, M.Pd.
(Member I)
(
)
3. Mauly Halwat H, Ph. D.
(Member II)
(
)
Dean,
Prof. Dr. Harun Joko Prayitno
NIP. 196504281993031001
iii
MOTTO
1. Talk Less Do More
2. Trying Better Than Silent And Thinking
3. Fight Until The End
4. Something Look Beautiful If We Don’t Have It
5. …Truly Allah Will Never Change The Condition Of A People Until
They Chanfe It Themselves (With Their Own Souls)… (Ar-Ra’du:11)
6. Imposible Is A Word Only To Be Found In The Dictionary Of Fools.
(Napoleon)
iv
DEDICATION
Alhamdulillah, as Allah’s Mercy
This research is dedicated to:
My beloved mother and father.
My beloved best friend.
v
TESTIMONY
Herewith, I testify that in this research paper, there is no plagiarism of the
previous literary work which has been raised to obtain bachelor degree of a
university, nor there are opinions or masterpieces which have been written or
published by other, except those in which in writing are referred in the manuscript
and mentioned in the literary review and bibliography.
Hence, later, if it is proven that there are some untrue statements in this
testimony hence I will be fully responsible.
Surakarta, July 13 2015
Andhy Septhyan N
A320110009
vi
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
Bismillahirrohmaanirrohiim
Assalaamu’alaikum Wr. Wb.
All praise to Allah SWT, most merciful, most compassionate that blessed
the researcher with health and guidance so that she is able to finish this research
paper entitled “CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK APPLIED THE TEACHER IN
TEACHING WRITING DESCRIPTIVE TEXT TO THE FIRST YEAR OF
SMP NEGERI 2 BLORA IN 2014/2015 ACADEMIC YEAR” as one of the
requirements for getting bachelor degree of education in English Department of
Muhammadiyah University of Surakarta.
Praise and invocation also give to our Great Messenger, Muhammad SAW
whom we always hope his intercession in the end of the world.
The researcher realizes that without the help from the other people, it is
impossible to finish writing this research paper. On this opportunity, the
researcher wants to express his sincere appreciation to:
1. Prof. Dr. Harun Joko Prayitno, as Chief of the School of Teacher
Traininf and Education of Muhammadiyah University of Surakarta,
2. Mauly Halwat Hikmat, Ph.D, as Chief of English Department who has
given the researcher permission to write this research paper,
3. Aryati Prasetyarini, M. Pd., as the first consultant, who has given careful
guidance and suggestion during the completion of this research paper,
vii
4. Nur Hidayat, M.Pd., as the second consultant, who has given valuable
suggestion for the correction of the research paper,
5. All of English Department Lecturers of Muhammadiyah University of
Surakarta,
6. The big family of SMP Negeri 2 Blora “thanks for your kindness”,
7. All students at the first grade of SMP Negeri 2 Blora for helping him in
collecting the data,
8. His beloved parent; mother Anik Herawati and father Muhamad
Mahfud for praying deep affection and everything for me “I’ll always do
the best for your old age, I love you both so much”,
9. His beloved girlfriend (Maruta Ratu Kumala) that always gives support
and affection for study and being a best friend for him,
10. His beloved friends; Tatag P. G., Husein Yusuf. M. Erfan N. Ahmad
Rozin (Wendy), Safrizal Rahardi (Nyapi), and Widya Arif (Begi)
Thanks for the support and accompany me did this paper began morning
till morning.
viii
SUMMARY
Andhy Septhyan N, A320110009. CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK
APPLIED THE TEACHER IN THE TEACHING WRITING
DESCRIPTIVE TEXT TO THE FIRST YEAR OF SMP NEGERI 2 BLORA
IN 2014/2015 ACADEMIC YEAR. Research Paper. Muhammadiyah
Universitity of Surakarta. 2015. This is study is aimed at describing: 1) the
types of corrective feedback in teaching writing descriptive text, and 2) the
students response to the corrective feedback given by teacher in the teaching
writing descriptive text. In achieving the objectives, the researcher used
descriptive qualitative as an approach to collect and analyze the data. The research
was held in SMP Negeri 2 Blora. The research took 33 students of the first grade
students as the subject of the study. The writer gets the data of the research from
event, informant, and document. The techniques of collecting data are the
observation and interview about the writing teaching learning process. The result
of the analysis shows that teacher corrective feedback technique is appropriate and
effective for the first grade students of SMP Negeri 2 Blora in teaching writing
descriptive text. The teacher in the SMP Negeri 2 Blora combined both oral
corrective feedback and written corrective feedback. By using this technique, the
students are capable of knowing their errors, the reason and correct it. Especially
in oral corrective feedback, the researcher found a new technique that was used by
the teacher. So it can facilitate the teaching learning writing process. The students
feel comfortable and enjoy the class. The students were not afraid when they
made an error. Corrective feedback could come from the other students. This
condition make the students active because they could share their idea to another
students when there is an error.
Keyword: teacher corrective feedback technique, descriptive text
ix
TABLE OF CONTENT
COVER................................................................................................................. i
APPROVAL ......................................................................................................... ii
ACCEPTANCE .................................................................................................... iii
MOTTO ................................................................................................................ iv
DEDICATION ..................................................................................................... v
TESTIMONY ....................................................................................................... vi
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT .................................................................................... vii
ABSTRACT ......................................................................................................... ix
TABLE OF CONTENT ....................................................................................... x
CHAPTER I: INTRODUCTION ......................................................................... 1
A. Background of the Study .......................................................................... 1
B. Scope of the Study .................................................................................... 4
C. Problem Statement.................................................................................... 4
D. Objective of the Study .............................................................................. 4
E. Benefit of the Study .................................................................................. 4
F. Paper Organization ................................................................................... 5
CHAPTER II: UNDERLYING THEORY ........................................................... 7
A. Previous Study .......................................................................................... 7
B. Theoretical Review ................................................................................... 9
1. Notion of Teaching Writing............................................................... 9
2. Notion of Writing .............................................................................. 11
3. Principles of Teaching Writing.......................................................... 11
x
4. Method on Teaching Writing ............................................................ 13
5. The Role of Teacher in Teaching Writing ......................................... 14
6. Descriptive Text................................................................................. 15
7. Teacher Corrective Feedback ............................................................ 16
a. Notion Of Teacher Corrective Feedback .................................... 16
b. Types Of Teacher Corrective Feedback ..................................... 17
1) Oral Feedback ...................................................................... 17
2) Written Feedback................................................................. 19
c. Positive And Negative Feedback ................................................ 20
1) Feedback On Content (Positive Feedback) ......................... 21
2) Feedback On Form ( Negative Feedback) ........................... 21
d. The Use Of Teacher Corrective Feedback On
Teaching Writing Skill ............................................................... 22
CHAPTER III: RESEARCH METHOD .............................................................. 23
A. Type of Research ...................................................................................... 23
B. Subject and Object of the Study ............................................................... 23
C. Data and Data Source ............................................................................... 24
D. Method of Collecting Data ....................................................................... 24
E. Technique Of Analyzing Data .................................................................. 25
CHAPTER IV: RESEARCH FINDING AND DISCUSSION ............................ 27
A. Research Finding ...................................................................................... 27
1. The Implementation of Corrective Feedback
in SMP Negeri 2 Blora ...................................................................... 28
xi
2. The Students Response To The Corrective Feedback ....................... 44
B. Discussion of the Finding ......................................................................... 47
CHAPTER V: CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTION ........................................ 52
A. Conclusion ................................................................................................ 52
B. Suggestion ................................................................................................ 53
BIBLIOGRAPHY ............................................................................................... 55
APPENDIX .......................................................................................................... 56
xii
TEACHING WRITING DESCRIPTIVE TEXT TO THE FIRST YEAR OF
SMP NEGERI 2 BLORA IN 2014/2015 ACADEMIC YEAR
RESEARCH PAPER
Submitted as a Partial Fulfillment of the Requirement for Getting Bachelor
Degree of Education in English Department
By
ANDHY SEPTHYAN NUGRAHA
A320110009
SCHOOL OF TEACHER TAINING AND EDUCATION
MUHAMMADIYAH UNIVERSITY OF SURAKARTA
2015
APPROVAL
CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK APPLIED BY THE TEACHER IN TEACHING
WRITING DESCRIPTIVE TEXT TO THE FIRST YEAR OF SMP NEGERI 2
BLORA IN 2014/2015 ACADEMIC YEAR
by
ANDHY SEPTHYAN N
A320110009
Approved to be Examined by Consultant:
First Consultant
Second Consultant
Aryati Prasetyarini, M.Pd
Nur Hidayat, M. Pd.
NIP. 725
NIK. 771
ii
ACCEPTANCE
CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK APPLIED BY THE TEACHER IN TEACHING
WRITING DESCRIPTIVE TEXT TO THE FIRST YEAR OF SMP NEGERI 2
BLORA IN 2014/2015 ACADEMIC YEAR
by
ANDHY SEPTYAN N
A320110009
Accepted and Approved by Board of Examiners School of Teacher Training and
Education Muhammadiyah University of Surakarta on August 8, 2015
Team of Examiners:
1. Aryati Prasetyarini, M.Pd.
(Chair Person)
(
)
2. Nur Hidayat, M.Pd.
(Member I)
(
)
3. Mauly Halwat H, Ph. D.
(Member II)
(
)
Dean,
Prof. Dr. Harun Joko Prayitno
NIP. 196504281993031001
iii
MOTTO
1. Talk Less Do More
2. Trying Better Than Silent And Thinking
3. Fight Until The End
4. Something Look Beautiful If We Don’t Have It
5. …Truly Allah Will Never Change The Condition Of A People Until
They Chanfe It Themselves (With Their Own Souls)… (Ar-Ra’du:11)
6. Imposible Is A Word Only To Be Found In The Dictionary Of Fools.
(Napoleon)
iv
DEDICATION
Alhamdulillah, as Allah’s Mercy
This research is dedicated to:
My beloved mother and father.
My beloved best friend.
v
TESTIMONY
Herewith, I testify that in this research paper, there is no plagiarism of the
previous literary work which has been raised to obtain bachelor degree of a
university, nor there are opinions or masterpieces which have been written or
published by other, except those in which in writing are referred in the manuscript
and mentioned in the literary review and bibliography.
Hence, later, if it is proven that there are some untrue statements in this
testimony hence I will be fully responsible.
Surakarta, July 13 2015
Andhy Septhyan N
A320110009
vi
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
Bismillahirrohmaanirrohiim
Assalaamu’alaikum Wr. Wb.
All praise to Allah SWT, most merciful, most compassionate that blessed
the researcher with health and guidance so that she is able to finish this research
paper entitled “CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK APPLIED THE TEACHER IN
TEACHING WRITING DESCRIPTIVE TEXT TO THE FIRST YEAR OF
SMP NEGERI 2 BLORA IN 2014/2015 ACADEMIC YEAR” as one of the
requirements for getting bachelor degree of education in English Department of
Muhammadiyah University of Surakarta.
Praise and invocation also give to our Great Messenger, Muhammad SAW
whom we always hope his intercession in the end of the world.
The researcher realizes that without the help from the other people, it is
impossible to finish writing this research paper. On this opportunity, the
researcher wants to express his sincere appreciation to:
1. Prof. Dr. Harun Joko Prayitno, as Chief of the School of Teacher
Traininf and Education of Muhammadiyah University of Surakarta,
2. Mauly Halwat Hikmat, Ph.D, as Chief of English Department who has
given the researcher permission to write this research paper,
3. Aryati Prasetyarini, M. Pd., as the first consultant, who has given careful
guidance and suggestion during the completion of this research paper,
vii
4. Nur Hidayat, M.Pd., as the second consultant, who has given valuable
suggestion for the correction of the research paper,
5. All of English Department Lecturers of Muhammadiyah University of
Surakarta,
6. The big family of SMP Negeri 2 Blora “thanks for your kindness”,
7. All students at the first grade of SMP Negeri 2 Blora for helping him in
collecting the data,
8. His beloved parent; mother Anik Herawati and father Muhamad
Mahfud for praying deep affection and everything for me “I’ll always do
the best for your old age, I love you both so much”,
9. His beloved girlfriend (Maruta Ratu Kumala) that always gives support
and affection for study and being a best friend for him,
10. His beloved friends; Tatag P. G., Husein Yusuf. M. Erfan N. Ahmad
Rozin (Wendy), Safrizal Rahardi (Nyapi), and Widya Arif (Begi)
Thanks for the support and accompany me did this paper began morning
till morning.
viii
SUMMARY
Andhy Septhyan N, A320110009. CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK
APPLIED THE TEACHER IN THE TEACHING WRITING
DESCRIPTIVE TEXT TO THE FIRST YEAR OF SMP NEGERI 2 BLORA
IN 2014/2015 ACADEMIC YEAR. Research Paper. Muhammadiyah
Universitity of Surakarta. 2015. This is study is aimed at describing: 1) the
types of corrective feedback in teaching writing descriptive text, and 2) the
students response to the corrective feedback given by teacher in the teaching
writing descriptive text. In achieving the objectives, the researcher used
descriptive qualitative as an approach to collect and analyze the data. The research
was held in SMP Negeri 2 Blora. The research took 33 students of the first grade
students as the subject of the study. The writer gets the data of the research from
event, informant, and document. The techniques of collecting data are the
observation and interview about the writing teaching learning process. The result
of the analysis shows that teacher corrective feedback technique is appropriate and
effective for the first grade students of SMP Negeri 2 Blora in teaching writing
descriptive text. The teacher in the SMP Negeri 2 Blora combined both oral
corrective feedback and written corrective feedback. By using this technique, the
students are capable of knowing their errors, the reason and correct it. Especially
in oral corrective feedback, the researcher found a new technique that was used by
the teacher. So it can facilitate the teaching learning writing process. The students
feel comfortable and enjoy the class. The students were not afraid when they
made an error. Corrective feedback could come from the other students. This
condition make the students active because they could share their idea to another
students when there is an error.
Keyword: teacher corrective feedback technique, descriptive text
ix
TABLE OF CONTENT
COVER................................................................................................................. i
APPROVAL ......................................................................................................... ii
ACCEPTANCE .................................................................................................... iii
MOTTO ................................................................................................................ iv
DEDICATION ..................................................................................................... v
TESTIMONY ....................................................................................................... vi
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT .................................................................................... vii
ABSTRACT ......................................................................................................... ix
TABLE OF CONTENT ....................................................................................... x
CHAPTER I: INTRODUCTION ......................................................................... 1
A. Background of the Study .......................................................................... 1
B. Scope of the Study .................................................................................... 4
C. Problem Statement.................................................................................... 4
D. Objective of the Study .............................................................................. 4
E. Benefit of the Study .................................................................................. 4
F. Paper Organization ................................................................................... 5
CHAPTER II: UNDERLYING THEORY ........................................................... 7
A. Previous Study .......................................................................................... 7
B. Theoretical Review ................................................................................... 9
1. Notion of Teaching Writing............................................................... 9
2. Notion of Writing .............................................................................. 11
3. Principles of Teaching Writing.......................................................... 11
x
4. Method on Teaching Writing ............................................................ 13
5. The Role of Teacher in Teaching Writing ......................................... 14
6. Descriptive Text................................................................................. 15
7. Teacher Corrective Feedback ............................................................ 16
a. Notion Of Teacher Corrective Feedback .................................... 16
b. Types Of Teacher Corrective Feedback ..................................... 17
1) Oral Feedback ...................................................................... 17
2) Written Feedback................................................................. 19
c. Positive And Negative Feedback ................................................ 20
1) Feedback On Content (Positive Feedback) ......................... 21
2) Feedback On Form ( Negative Feedback) ........................... 21
d. The Use Of Teacher Corrective Feedback On
Teaching Writing Skill ............................................................... 22
CHAPTER III: RESEARCH METHOD .............................................................. 23
A. Type of Research ...................................................................................... 23
B. Subject and Object of the Study ............................................................... 23
C. Data and Data Source ............................................................................... 24
D. Method of Collecting Data ....................................................................... 24
E. Technique Of Analyzing Data .................................................................. 25
CHAPTER IV: RESEARCH FINDING AND DISCUSSION ............................ 27
A. Research Finding ...................................................................................... 27
1. The Implementation of Corrective Feedback
in SMP Negeri 2 Blora ...................................................................... 28
xi
2. The Students Response To The Corrective Feedback ....................... 44
B. Discussion of the Finding ......................................................................... 47
CHAPTER V: CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTION ........................................ 52
A. Conclusion ................................................................................................ 52
B. Suggestion ................................................................................................ 53
BIBLIOGRAPHY ............................................................................................... 55
APPENDIX .......................................................................................................... 56
xii