THE IMPACT OF REWARD SYSTEM ON EMPLOYEE'S PERFORMANCE CASE OF ELANG PERKASA MOTOR PADANG 2010.

oxfiiiProYEl'sIERmRuNC9

hwdqoP6d4@bohfu4fu)oleN

KdoMadFi!/6^FlDs})Nlni
ltuli:M iq{dNoBP:6Eanr I
slMi : I df, r hre, Akhd 064 16

kt

i6r

e

'tdt

Lir, lJt t@h

tu

roddbndsueEbryPqk6Mod

rcv&dlyj!!bqPlo*!Flomzie
csei30'dFrromN.oilnploq

hoot$ush.L!1h.o@dmbhi*ed.gN]

s6!ddl@nFn$,L4eadsn

en@y

n god o@eh,

rd @{o\ ad

4iied}u4fu6^&li4i4&d

detr

$rt .h{ do eur b b qedyq ad lEi

Lndqqs ({d 6u


6c

'

deF olrueor.he@

4Yircmd (Hari &d

}rn rt]!

rhlr

rbo)

jli

rry

mne detr rtm!


d4

iio Moror

ree)

d by

s.*tug tun oc& hdd$

p5F6lqi.d i*di
s

hdP

idmri! dcqePcd

eNt{ d


od codrrts

t2oo2l

de qphnd

CONCLUSIO\ I,IMITATION, SUCCXSTION

dy*dogslsswhtbds$rdyElFidtdsdplorq{sud

drbryfufu$

mwan\s!al".12

n

! [email protected],,tr, 41.,t stt,t nd

^kaL. ^


0sr). .tuh d b6u h rd]d\ig". lte{k ravrct

"

coD).

,oidorrLri^sotrd.lure.vd
^rkqRs

udnDr4RH

cod).

atltutid

11e .nrroEc rcrccorbn

ie No

d


dc

2.pr. 5 rr.

"6
9$4h@d/,'l1o@,051,,010

aimlm, sei.r:h Peil.nb@ suki a

EnPlo!{nddio6'\d'3aNo5'@494.514

Gftf c. C@t, 'U
Lhk4* re Rde dfr!'sftrgd" dde

Bqlq, D.E sd

otrdrn,ed, r4@efre4 \6r r j

cebpF tuo,


(1ee9, "Usis

ru

HRM

syk". rcd.4

o/

No 7. $.57s 5e4

.

sv.s-'Ld{'riP&opnfulbn

exi4nelJereivd20No6,pP''2jn