6. DAFTAR PUSTAKA - 07.70.0144 Dominicus Addiea Arviannanda DAFTAR PUSTAKA
6. DAFTAR PUSTAKA
Adawyah, R. (2007). Pengolahan dan Pengawetan Ikan. Bumi Aksara. Jakarta
Aitken, A; I.M. Mackie; J.H. Merrit dan M.L. Windsor. (1982). Fish Handling and
Processing. Crown. Edinburgh.
Anonim (2009). The Shelf Life of Vacuum Packed and Non-Vacuum Packed Food.
Sumber www.lava-vacuum-packing.com. Didownload tanggal: 6 September
2012
Apriyantono, A, D. Fardiaz, N.L. Puspitasari, Sedarnawati dan Budiyanto. (1989).
Petunjuk Laboratorium Analisa. Pangan dan Gizi. IPB
Arambewela, L., Arawwawala M., and Rajapaksa, D. (2006). Piper Betel : a Potential
Natural Antioxidant. International Journal of Food Science Vol 41 (Suplement
1): 10-14
Ariyani, F. J.T.Murtini dan T.H. Siregar. (2010). Penggunaan Ekstrak Daun Jambu Biji
(Psidium guajava) sebagai Pengawet Pindang Tongkol. Jurnal Pascapanen dan
Bioteknologi Kelautan dan Perikanan Vol 5 (1): 29-42
Association of Official Analytical Chemists. (1990). Official Method of Analysis
Volume One 15th Edition. Association of Official Analytical Chemist Inc.
Arlington, Virginia USA.
Badan Pengawas Obat dan Makanan Republik Indonesia. (2009). Penetapan Batas
Maksimum Cemaran Mikroba dan Kimia dalam Makanan. Percetakan Negara.
Jakarta
Bennion, M and O. Hughes. (1975). Introductory Foods 6th ed. Macmillan Publishing
Company, Inc. USA
Caballero, M.E, Lopez, M, Perez-Mateos, J.A, Borderiaz and Montero, P. (2000).
Extension of The Shelf Life of Prawns (Panaeus japonicas) by Vacuum
Packaging and High-Pressure Treatment. Journal of Food Protection Vol 63
(10): 1381-1388
deMan, J.M. (1997). Food Chemistry (Terjemahan: Kimia Makanan, diterjemahkan K.
Padmawinata). Edisi kedua. Penerbit ITB. Bandung
Direktorat Jenderal Perikanan. 1979. Buku Pedoman Pengenalan Sumberdaya
Perikanan Laut Bagian 1: Jenis-jenis Ikan Ekonomis Penting. Direktorat
Jenderal Perikanan. Departemen Pertanian.
Fardiaz, S. (1992). Mikrobiologi Pangan 1. PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama. Jakarta
40
41
Fellows, P. (2000). Food Processing Technology : Principles and Practises 2nd edition.
Woodhead Publishing Limited. Cambridge.
Fitzgerald, M, D.B. Papkovsky, M. Smiddy, J.P. Kerry, C.K. O’Sullivan, D.J. Buckley
and G.G. Guilbault. (2001). Non-Destructive Monitoring of Oxygen Profiles in
Packaged Food Using Phase-Fluorimetric Oxygen Sensor. Journal of Food
Science Vol 66 (1): 105-110
Flick, G. Jr. (2003). Novel Applications of High Pressure Processing. Global
Aquaculture Advocate Vol.6, Issue 3
Frazier, W.C and D.C. Westhoff. (1988). Food Microbiology 4th Edition. McGraw-Hill
Book Co. Singapore
Hadiwiyoto, S. (1995). Hubungan Keadaan Kimiawi dm Mikrobiologik Ikan Pindang
Naya Pada Penyimpanan Suhu Kamar Dengan Sifat Organoleptiknya. Fakultas
Teknologi Pertanian. Universitas Gadjah Mada. Yogyakarta.
Hall, G.M. (1997). Fish Processing Technology 2nd ed. Blackie Academy and
Professional. Glasgow
Handayani, N.M.S, A.A.S. Dewi, N. Riti dan I.G.P.S. Ardana. (2004) Cemaran
Mikroba dan Residu Antibiotika Pada Produk Asal Hewan di Provinsi Bali,
NTB dan NTT Tahun 2003-2004. Sumber http://bppv-dps.info. Didownload
tanggal 6 September 2012.
Herschdoefer, S.M. (1986). Quality Control in the Food Industry 2nd ed. Vol. 2.
Academic Press, Inc. London.
Howgate, P. (2010). A Critical Review of Total-Volatile-Bases and Trimethylamine as
Indices of Freshness of Fish. Part 2: Formation of the Bases and Application in
Quality Assurance. Electronic Journal of Environmental, Agricultural and Food
Chemistry Vol 9(1): 58-88
Ilyas, S. (1983). Teknologi Refrigasi Hasil Perikanan: Teknik Pendinginan Ikan Jilid 1.
CV Paripurna. Jakarta
Jenie, B.S.L, Nuratifa dan Suliantari. (2001). Peningkatan Keamanan dan Mutu Simpan
Pindang Ikan Kembung (Rastrelliger sp) dengan Aplikasi Kombinasi Natrium
Asetat, Bakteri Asam Laktat dan Pengemasan Vakum. Jurnal Teknologi dan
Industri Pangan Vol XII (1) : 21-27
Julianti, E dan M. Nurminah. (2006). Teknologi Pengemasan. Departemen Teknologi
Pertanian Fakultas Pertanian Universitas Sumatera Utara.
Juneja, V.K and J.N. Sofos. (2002). Control of Foodborne Microorganism. Marcel
Dekker Inc. New York
42
Kadoya, T. (1990). Food Packaging. Academic Press Inc. San Diego, California
Kerr, M. Lawicki, P. Aguirre, S. and Rayner, C. (2002). Effect of Storage Conditions on
Histamine Formation in Fresh and Canned Tuna. State Chemitry Laboratory,
Werrbee. Victorian Government Departement of Human Services.
www.foodsafety.vic.gov.au
Komariah, I.I. Arief dan Y. Wiguna. (2004). Kualitas Fisik dan Mikroba Daging Sapi
yang Ditambah Jahe (Zingiber officinale Roscoe) pada Konsentrasi dan Lama
Penyimpanan yang Berbeda. Media Peternakan ed. Agustus Vol 27 (2) : 46-54
Lin, K.W and Lin, S.N. (2002). Physicochemical Properties and Microbial Stability of
Reduced-Fat Chinese-Style Sausage Stored Under Modified Atmosphere
Systems. Journal of Food Science Vol 67 (8): 3184-3189
Marwati, T, Ch. Winarti dan D. Sumangat. (1996). Aktivitas Zat Antibakteri pada
Rimpang Kunyit. Prosiding Simpusium Nasional: Tumbuhan Obat dan
Aromatik APIMAP: 37-43
Moeljanto. (1992). Pengawetan dan Pengolahan Hasil Perikanan. Penebar Swadaya.
Jakarta
Oonmetta-aree, J., T.Suzuki, P.Gasaluck and G.Eumkeb. (2006) Antimicrobial
Properties and Action of Galangal (Alpina galangal Linn.) on Staphylococcus
aureus. www.elsevier.com/locate/lwt LWT 39 (2006): 1214-1220
Pandit, G.S, Mangku, G.P dan Suparwata, N.B. (1997). Penggunaan Jenis Bahan
Pengemas dan Lama Penyimpanan terhadap Stabilitas Mutu Ikan Tongkol.
Prosiding Seminar Teknologi Pangan 1997: 487-495
_____, Suryadhi, N.T, Arka, I.B dan Adiputra, N. (2011). Pengaruh Penyiangan dan
Suhu Penyimpanan terhadap Mutu Kimiawi, Mikrobiologis dan Organoleptik
Ikan Tongkol (Auxis thazard, Lac). Sumber http: //ejournal.unud.ac.id/ abstrak/
e-journal_suranaya_pandit.doc. Didownload tanggal: 6 September 2012
Potter, N.N. and H.J. Hotchkiss. (1996). Food Science 5th Edition. CBB Publisher. New
Delhi.
Purwani, E dan Muwakhidah. (2008). Efek Berbagai Pengawet Alami Sebagai
Pengganti Formalin terhadap Sifat Orgaanoleptik dan Masa Simpan Daging dan
Ikan. Jurnal Penelitian Sains & Teknologi Vol 9(1): 1-4
_________, S.Wulang.N.H dan R.Rauf. (2009). Respon Hambatan Bakteri Gram Positif
dan Negatif pada Ikan Nila (Oreochromis niloticus) yang Diawetkan dengan
Ekstrak Jahe (Zingiber officinale). Jurnal Kesehatan ISSN 1979-7621 Vol 2(1):
61-70
43
_________, E. Retnaningtyas dan D. Widowati. (2012). Pengembangan Model
Pengawet Alami dari Ekstrak Lengkuas (Languas galaga) Kunyit (Curcuma
domestica) dan Jahe (Zingiber officinale) sebagai Pengganti Formalin pada
Daging Segar. Makalah Seminar Nasional IX Pendidikan Biologi FKIP UNS 7
Juli 2012
Puspitasari, Y.F. (2009). Cara Pemindangan dan Kadar Protein Ikan Tomgkol (Auxis
thazard) di Kabupaten Rembang. Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan
Universitas Muhammadiah Surakarta (Skripsi)
Rosenthal, A.J. (1999). Food Texture Measurement & Perception. Aspen Publisher, Inc.
Maryland.
Setyabudi, D.A dan W. Broto. (2008). Kemasan Plastik Telah Menggeser Kemasan
Tradisional.http://pascapanen.litbang.deptan.go.id/index.php/berita/55
didownload tanggal: 6 September 2012.
Shahidi, Fereidoon and J.R. Botta. (1994). Seafoods: Chemistry, Processing Technology
and Quality. Blackie Academy and Professional. Glasgow.
Standar Nasional Indonesia. (2006). Penentuan Angka Lempeng Total (ALT) pada
Produk Perikanan. SNI 01-2332.3-2006
Syarief, R. dan H. Halid. (1991). Teknologi Pengolahan Pangan. Arcan.Jakarta
Widyasari, R.A.H.E. (2006). Pengaruh Pengawetan menggunakan Biji Picung
(Pangium edule Reinw) Terhadap Kesegaran dan Keamanan Ikan Kembung
Segar (Rastrelliger brachysoma). Sekolah Pascasarjana Institut Pertanian Bogor.
Bogor (Thesis)
Winarno, F.G; S. Fardiaz dan F.Dedi. (1984). Pengantar Teknologi Pertanian.
PT.Gramedia. Jakarta.
Welt, B.A; D.S. Sage and K.L. Berger. (2003). Performance Spesification of TimeTemperaature Integrators Designed to Protect Against Botulism in Refrigerated
Fresh Food. Journal of Food Science Vol 68(1): 2-9
Zheng, X; Y. Lan; C. Liu; N. Ding and T. Zhao. (2009) Effect of Rice Fissure on Taste
Quality of Cooked Rice. Agricultural Engineering International: the CIGR
Ejournal. Vol XI: Manuscript 1190
44
7. LAMPIRAN
Lampiran 1. Pindang Ikan Tongkol pada Perlakuan Garam dan Ekstrak Rempah
45
46
47
Lampiran 2. Pengamatan Total Plate Count Pindang Ikan Tongkol
48
49
50
51
Lampiran 3. Hasil Analisa Data (Output SPSS)
Oneway
Post Hoc Tests
Homogeneous Subsets
Air_0
Duncan
Subset for alpha = .05
Treatment
Lengkuas
N
6
1
66.2617
2
3
4
Kluwak
6
66.7400
Lengkuas UV
6
66.7433
Kluwak UV
6
67.2200
Garam UV
6
67.7950
67.7950
Kunyit UV
6
68.1550
68.1550
68.1550
Jahe
6
68.2100
68.2100
68.2100
Kunyit
6
68.7050
68.7050
Garam
6
Jahe UV
6
67.2200
68.9483
68.9533
Sig.
.068
.059
Means for groups in homogeneous subsets are displayed.
a Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size = 6.000.
.083
T_Air_0
Duncan
Subset for alpha = .05
Treatment
Lengkuas
6
1
66.3333
Kluwak
6
66.6667
Lengkuas UV
6
66.6667
Kluwak UV
6
67.1667
Garam UV
6
68.0000
68.0000
Jahe
6
68.1667
68.1667
Kunyit UV
6
68.1667
68.1667
Kunyit
6
68.6667
Garam
6
69.0000
Jahe UV
6
69.0000
Sig.
N
2
3
67.1667
.115
.058
Means for groups in homogeneous subsets are displayed.
a Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size = 6.000.
.069
.138
52
TVN_0
Duncan
Subset for alpha = .05
Treatment
Garam UV
N
6
1
165.54550
2
Garam
6
165.66950
Kunyit
6
168.20900
Jahe
6
168.29200
Jahe UV
6
168.35533
Kunyit UV
6
169.26100
Lengkuas
6
177.00517
Lengkuas UV
6
177.07650
Kluwak
6
Kluwak UV
6
180.58317
.813
.071
Means for groups in homogeneous subsets are displayed.
a Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size = 6.000.
TMA_0
Duncan
Subset for alpha = .05
6
1
22.19917
Jahe UV
6
22.20650
Lengkuas
6
22.49950
Kluwak
6
22.50450
Lengkuas UV
N
2
6
22.50467
Kluwak UV
6
22.50950
Kunyit UV
6
24.12850
Kunyit
6
24.13483
Garam UV
6
24.76767
Garam
6
24.78133
Sig.
4
180.52933
Sig.
Treatment
Jahe
3
.593
.241
Means for groups in homogeneous subsets are displayed.
a Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size = 6.000.
.892
.918
53
Hard_0
Duncan
Subset for alpha = .05
Treatment
Jahe
N
6
1
874.15083
Jahe UV
6
874.15083
Lengkuas
6
884.96967
Lengkuas UV
6
884.96967
Kluwak
6
932.98733
Kluwak UV
6
932.98733
Kunyit
2
1047.9946
7
1047.9946
7
6
Kunyit UV
6
Garam
3
6
Garam UV
6
Sig.
.070
1.000
Means for groups in homogeneous subsets are displayed.
a Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size = 6.000.
1.000
4
1143.5201
7
1143.5201
7
1.000
Spring_0
Duncan
Subset for alpha = .05
Treatment
Lengkuas
N
1
2
3
6
2.51550
Lengkuas UV
6
2.51550
Kunyit
6
2.55667
Kunyit UV
6
2.55667
Kluwak
6
3.02500
Kluwak UV
6
3.02500
Jahe
6
3.32717
Jahe UV
6
3.32717
Garam
6
Garam UV
6
Sig.
4
3.77483
3.77483
.784
1.000
Means for groups in homogeneous subsets are displayed.
a Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size = 6.000.
1.000
1.000
54
TPC_0
Duncan
Subset for alpha = .05
Treatment
Jahe UV
N
6
1
5.45017
2
3
Jahe
6
5.45033
Lengkuas
6
5.47600
Lengkuas UV
6
5.47600
Kunyit
6
5.70717
Kunyit UV
6
5.70717
Garam UV
6
5.72283
Garam
6
5.74517
Kluwak
6
6.45017
Kluwak UV
6
6.45017
Sig.
.640
.491
Means for groups in homogeneous subsets are displayed.
a Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size = 6.000.
Air_3
1.000
Duncan
Subset for alpha = .05
Treatment
Kluwak
6
1
65.5533
Lengkuas
6
66.2300
66.2300
Kunyit
6
66.7483
66.7483
66.7483
Jahe
6
66.8883
66.8883
66.8883
Garam UV
6
67.6783
67.6783
67.6783
Garam
6
67.9250
67.9250
67.9250
Kluwak UV
6
68.4983
68.4983
Jahe UV
6
69.5667
69.5667
Kunyit UV
6
69.5917
69.5917
Lengkuas UV
6
Sig.
N
2
.181
.097
Means for groups in homogeneous subsets are displayed.
a Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size = 6.000.
3
4
5
70.6900
.086
.060
.243
55
TVN_3
Duncan
Treatmen
t
Garam
Kunyit
Kluwak
Jahe
Lengkuas
Jahe UV
Kunyit
UV
Lengkuas
UV
Kluwak
UV
Garam
UV
Sig.
Subset for alpha = .05
N
6
1
135.51
900
6
6
6
2
143.80
883
3
4
151.04
483
152.00
217
6
157.82
467
6
5
170.40
717
6
6
7
178.22
650
182.41
033
6
6
8
193.44
067
6
1.000
1.000
.281
1.000
Means for groups in homogeneous subsets are displayed.
a Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size = 6.000.
1.000
1.000
1.000
1.000
9
196.56
833
1.000
TMA_3
Duncan
Subset for alpha = .05
Treatment
Jahe UV
6
1
31.23500
Lengkuas
6
31.47067
Lengkuas UV
6
35.13867
Kunyit
6
36.00750
Kluwak UV
6
Jahe
6
39.44800
Kunyit UV
6
40.73767
Garam
6
42.84050
Kluwak
6
42.91967
Garam UV
6
Sig.
N
2
.725
.198
Means for groups in homogeneous subsets are displayed.
a Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size = 6.000.
3
4
5
6
38.03400
46.36850
1.000
.059
.906
1.000
56
Hard_3
Duncan
Subset for alpha = .05
Treatment
Kluwak
Jahe
Kunyit
Garam
Garam UV
Lengkuas
Lengkuas
UV
Jahe UV
Kluwak UV
Kunyit UV
N
6
6
1
741.094
50
742.698
00
6
6
2
895.409
67
899.709
17
6
3
949.521
00
6
4
5
1139.26
650
6
6
1167.31
417
6
1588.86
383
6
.759
.412
1.000
1.000
1.000
1.000
Means for groups in homogeneous subsets are displayed.
a Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size = 6.000.
Spring_3
Duncan
Subset for alpha = .05
N
1
6
2
3
4
2.47500
Lengkuas UV
6
2.75083
Kunyit UV
6
2.83667
Lengkuas
6
2.86650
Jahe UV
6
3.11850
Kluwak UV
6
3.12600
Kluwak
6
3.18283
Jahe
6
3.27867
Garam
6
Garam UV
6
Sig.
1735.97
367
6
Sig.
Treatment
Kunyit
7
3.53900
3.60350
1.000
.346
Means for groups in homogeneous subsets are displayed.
a Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size = 6.000.
.208
.575
1.000
8
2437.15
200
1.000
57
TPC_3
Duncan
Subset for alpha = .05
Treatment
Kluwak
N
6
1
6.74083
2
3
4
5
Garam UV
6
6.79117
Jahe UV
6
7.03317
Garam
6
7.12517
Kunyit UV
6
7.20883
7.20883
Kluwak UV
6
7.26850
7.26850
7.26850
Lengkuas UV
6
7.29183
7.29183
7.29183
Kunyit
6
7.31300
7.31300
Lengkuas
6
Jahe
6
7.12517
7.40400
.539
.264
Means for groups in homogeneous subsets are displayed.
a Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size = 6.000.
.066
.251
Air_7
Duncan
Subset for alpha = .05
6
1
55.7650
Jahe
6
56.3467
Garam
6
56.5533
Kunyit
6
56.9467
6
57.2650
Lengkuas
N
2
3
4
Kluwak UV
6
69.3167
Lengkuas UV
6
71.0133
Jahe UV
6
71.2017
Garam UV
6
71.2783
Kunyit UV
6
Sig.
7.40400
7.51500
Sig.
Treatment
Kluwak
6
.120
.050
Means for groups in homogeneous subsets are displayed.
a Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size = 6.000.
71.0133
73.6600
.771
1.000
.135
.179
58
T_Air_7
Duncan
Subset for alpha = .05
Treatment
Kluwak
N
6
1
.6486
2
3
Jahe
6
.6538
Garam
6
.6556
Kunyit
6
.6591
Lengkuas
6
.6617
Kluwak UV
6
.7592
Lengkuas UV
6
.7716
Jahe UV
6
.7731
Garam UV
6
.7734
Kunyit UV
6
.7904
.079
.052
Means for groups in homogeneous subsets are displayed.
a Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size = 6.000.
1.000
Sig.
TVN_7
Duncan
Subset for alpha = .05
Treatment
Jahe UV
Kunyit
Lengkuas
UV
Kunyit UV
Garam
Lengkuas
Kluwak UV
Kluwak
Jahe
Garam UV
Sig.
N
6
6
1
174.080
50
175.018
17
6
2
186.496
33
6
6
3
188.916
17
189.350
83
6
4
195.458
17
6
5
207.793
17
6
6
213.404
83
6
7
221.797
33
6
.306
1.000
.634
Means for groups in homogeneous subsets are displayed.
a Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size = 6.000.
1.000
1.000
1.000
1.000
8
227.496
50
1.000
59
TMA_7
Duncan
Treatmen
t
Jahe UV
Subset for alpha = .05
N
6
Lengkuas
UV
Kluwak
UV
Kunyit
1
38.767
50
6
6
2
3
51.601
17
53.013
33
56.430
83
6
Kunyit UV
4
58.756
83
6
Garam
UV
Garam
5
6
6
65.522
83
6
Lengkuas
7
78.244
50
6
Jahe
8
80.616
00
6
Kluwak
92.422
17
1.000
1.000
95.913
50
1.000
8
9
10
6
Sig.
1.000
.130
1.000
1.000
Means for groups in homogeneous subsets are displayed.
a Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size = 6.000.
Hard_7
1.000
1.000
9
Duncan
Treatme
nt
Lengkua
s UV
Kunyit
UV
Jahe UV
Kunyit
Jahe
Garam
UV
Garam
Lengkua
s
Kluwak
UV
Kluwak
Sig.
Subset for alpha = .05
N
6
6
6
6
6
1
1083.
89300
2
1333.
00700
3
1358.
02600
4
1948.
39900
5
2009.
11317
6
6
2153.
64817
6
7
2464.
72100
6
2714.
29617
6
2853.
79017
6
1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000
Means for groups in homogeneous subsets are displayed.
a Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size = 6.000.
1.000
1.000
1.000
1.000
3134.
08117
1.000
60
Spring_7
Duncan
Subset for alpha = .05
Treatment
Lengkuas UV
N
6
1
2.97717
2
3
4
Kunyit UV
6
3.02483
3.02483
Kunyit
6
3.10083
3.10083
Lengkuas
6
3.15100
3.15100
Jahe UV
6
3.15417
3.15417
Garam UV
6
3.27983
3.27983
Kluwak UV
6
3.32317
3.32317
Kluwak
6
Jahe
6
Garam
6
3.55000
5
3.55000
3.65583
4.16767
Sig.
.239
.050
Means for groups in homogeneous subsets are displayed.
a Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size = 6.000.
.057
.425
TPC_7
Duncan
Subset for alpha = .05
Treatment
Kluwak
6
1
7.20400
Kunyit UV
6
7.29383
Kunyit
6
Jahe UV
6
7.47433
Garam
N
2
3
4
7.29383
7.44150
7.44150
6
7.48917
Kluwak UV
6
7.49117
Garam UV
6
7.50183
Lengkuas UV
6
7.50883
Jahe
6
7.60800
Lengkuas
6
Sig.
.241
.057
Means for groups in homogeneous subsets are displayed.
a Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size = 6.000.
7.60800
7.72100
.061
.142
1.000
Adawyah, R. (2007). Pengolahan dan Pengawetan Ikan. Bumi Aksara. Jakarta
Aitken, A; I.M. Mackie; J.H. Merrit dan M.L. Windsor. (1982). Fish Handling and
Processing. Crown. Edinburgh.
Anonim (2009). The Shelf Life of Vacuum Packed and Non-Vacuum Packed Food.
Sumber www.lava-vacuum-packing.com. Didownload tanggal: 6 September
2012
Apriyantono, A, D. Fardiaz, N.L. Puspitasari, Sedarnawati dan Budiyanto. (1989).
Petunjuk Laboratorium Analisa. Pangan dan Gizi. IPB
Arambewela, L., Arawwawala M., and Rajapaksa, D. (2006). Piper Betel : a Potential
Natural Antioxidant. International Journal of Food Science Vol 41 (Suplement
1): 10-14
Ariyani, F. J.T.Murtini dan T.H. Siregar. (2010). Penggunaan Ekstrak Daun Jambu Biji
(Psidium guajava) sebagai Pengawet Pindang Tongkol. Jurnal Pascapanen dan
Bioteknologi Kelautan dan Perikanan Vol 5 (1): 29-42
Association of Official Analytical Chemists. (1990). Official Method of Analysis
Volume One 15th Edition. Association of Official Analytical Chemist Inc.
Arlington, Virginia USA.
Badan Pengawas Obat dan Makanan Republik Indonesia. (2009). Penetapan Batas
Maksimum Cemaran Mikroba dan Kimia dalam Makanan. Percetakan Negara.
Jakarta
Bennion, M and O. Hughes. (1975). Introductory Foods 6th ed. Macmillan Publishing
Company, Inc. USA
Caballero, M.E, Lopez, M, Perez-Mateos, J.A, Borderiaz and Montero, P. (2000).
Extension of The Shelf Life of Prawns (Panaeus japonicas) by Vacuum
Packaging and High-Pressure Treatment. Journal of Food Protection Vol 63
(10): 1381-1388
deMan, J.M. (1997). Food Chemistry (Terjemahan: Kimia Makanan, diterjemahkan K.
Padmawinata). Edisi kedua. Penerbit ITB. Bandung
Direktorat Jenderal Perikanan. 1979. Buku Pedoman Pengenalan Sumberdaya
Perikanan Laut Bagian 1: Jenis-jenis Ikan Ekonomis Penting. Direktorat
Jenderal Perikanan. Departemen Pertanian.
Fardiaz, S. (1992). Mikrobiologi Pangan 1. PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama. Jakarta
40
41
Fellows, P. (2000). Food Processing Technology : Principles and Practises 2nd edition.
Woodhead Publishing Limited. Cambridge.
Fitzgerald, M, D.B. Papkovsky, M. Smiddy, J.P. Kerry, C.K. O’Sullivan, D.J. Buckley
and G.G. Guilbault. (2001). Non-Destructive Monitoring of Oxygen Profiles in
Packaged Food Using Phase-Fluorimetric Oxygen Sensor. Journal of Food
Science Vol 66 (1): 105-110
Flick, G. Jr. (2003). Novel Applications of High Pressure Processing. Global
Aquaculture Advocate Vol.6, Issue 3
Frazier, W.C and D.C. Westhoff. (1988). Food Microbiology 4th Edition. McGraw-Hill
Book Co. Singapore
Hadiwiyoto, S. (1995). Hubungan Keadaan Kimiawi dm Mikrobiologik Ikan Pindang
Naya Pada Penyimpanan Suhu Kamar Dengan Sifat Organoleptiknya. Fakultas
Teknologi Pertanian. Universitas Gadjah Mada. Yogyakarta.
Hall, G.M. (1997). Fish Processing Technology 2nd ed. Blackie Academy and
Professional. Glasgow
Handayani, N.M.S, A.A.S. Dewi, N. Riti dan I.G.P.S. Ardana. (2004) Cemaran
Mikroba dan Residu Antibiotika Pada Produk Asal Hewan di Provinsi Bali,
NTB dan NTT Tahun 2003-2004. Sumber http://bppv-dps.info. Didownload
tanggal 6 September 2012.
Herschdoefer, S.M. (1986). Quality Control in the Food Industry 2nd ed. Vol. 2.
Academic Press, Inc. London.
Howgate, P. (2010). A Critical Review of Total-Volatile-Bases and Trimethylamine as
Indices of Freshness of Fish. Part 2: Formation of the Bases and Application in
Quality Assurance. Electronic Journal of Environmental, Agricultural and Food
Chemistry Vol 9(1): 58-88
Ilyas, S. (1983). Teknologi Refrigasi Hasil Perikanan: Teknik Pendinginan Ikan Jilid 1.
CV Paripurna. Jakarta
Jenie, B.S.L, Nuratifa dan Suliantari. (2001). Peningkatan Keamanan dan Mutu Simpan
Pindang Ikan Kembung (Rastrelliger sp) dengan Aplikasi Kombinasi Natrium
Asetat, Bakteri Asam Laktat dan Pengemasan Vakum. Jurnal Teknologi dan
Industri Pangan Vol XII (1) : 21-27
Julianti, E dan M. Nurminah. (2006). Teknologi Pengemasan. Departemen Teknologi
Pertanian Fakultas Pertanian Universitas Sumatera Utara.
Juneja, V.K and J.N. Sofos. (2002). Control of Foodborne Microorganism. Marcel
Dekker Inc. New York
42
Kadoya, T. (1990). Food Packaging. Academic Press Inc. San Diego, California
Kerr, M. Lawicki, P. Aguirre, S. and Rayner, C. (2002). Effect of Storage Conditions on
Histamine Formation in Fresh and Canned Tuna. State Chemitry Laboratory,
Werrbee. Victorian Government Departement of Human Services.
www.foodsafety.vic.gov.au
Komariah, I.I. Arief dan Y. Wiguna. (2004). Kualitas Fisik dan Mikroba Daging Sapi
yang Ditambah Jahe (Zingiber officinale Roscoe) pada Konsentrasi dan Lama
Penyimpanan yang Berbeda. Media Peternakan ed. Agustus Vol 27 (2) : 46-54
Lin, K.W and Lin, S.N. (2002). Physicochemical Properties and Microbial Stability of
Reduced-Fat Chinese-Style Sausage Stored Under Modified Atmosphere
Systems. Journal of Food Science Vol 67 (8): 3184-3189
Marwati, T, Ch. Winarti dan D. Sumangat. (1996). Aktivitas Zat Antibakteri pada
Rimpang Kunyit. Prosiding Simpusium Nasional: Tumbuhan Obat dan
Aromatik APIMAP: 37-43
Moeljanto. (1992). Pengawetan dan Pengolahan Hasil Perikanan. Penebar Swadaya.
Jakarta
Oonmetta-aree, J., T.Suzuki, P.Gasaluck and G.Eumkeb. (2006) Antimicrobial
Properties and Action of Galangal (Alpina galangal Linn.) on Staphylococcus
aureus. www.elsevier.com/locate/lwt LWT 39 (2006): 1214-1220
Pandit, G.S, Mangku, G.P dan Suparwata, N.B. (1997). Penggunaan Jenis Bahan
Pengemas dan Lama Penyimpanan terhadap Stabilitas Mutu Ikan Tongkol.
Prosiding Seminar Teknologi Pangan 1997: 487-495
_____, Suryadhi, N.T, Arka, I.B dan Adiputra, N. (2011). Pengaruh Penyiangan dan
Suhu Penyimpanan terhadap Mutu Kimiawi, Mikrobiologis dan Organoleptik
Ikan Tongkol (Auxis thazard, Lac). Sumber http: //ejournal.unud.ac.id/ abstrak/
e-journal_suranaya_pandit.doc. Didownload tanggal: 6 September 2012
Potter, N.N. and H.J. Hotchkiss. (1996). Food Science 5th Edition. CBB Publisher. New
Delhi.
Purwani, E dan Muwakhidah. (2008). Efek Berbagai Pengawet Alami Sebagai
Pengganti Formalin terhadap Sifat Orgaanoleptik dan Masa Simpan Daging dan
Ikan. Jurnal Penelitian Sains & Teknologi Vol 9(1): 1-4
_________, S.Wulang.N.H dan R.Rauf. (2009). Respon Hambatan Bakteri Gram Positif
dan Negatif pada Ikan Nila (Oreochromis niloticus) yang Diawetkan dengan
Ekstrak Jahe (Zingiber officinale). Jurnal Kesehatan ISSN 1979-7621 Vol 2(1):
61-70
43
_________, E. Retnaningtyas dan D. Widowati. (2012). Pengembangan Model
Pengawet Alami dari Ekstrak Lengkuas (Languas galaga) Kunyit (Curcuma
domestica) dan Jahe (Zingiber officinale) sebagai Pengganti Formalin pada
Daging Segar. Makalah Seminar Nasional IX Pendidikan Biologi FKIP UNS 7
Juli 2012
Puspitasari, Y.F. (2009). Cara Pemindangan dan Kadar Protein Ikan Tomgkol (Auxis
thazard) di Kabupaten Rembang. Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan
Universitas Muhammadiah Surakarta (Skripsi)
Rosenthal, A.J. (1999). Food Texture Measurement & Perception. Aspen Publisher, Inc.
Maryland.
Setyabudi, D.A dan W. Broto. (2008). Kemasan Plastik Telah Menggeser Kemasan
Tradisional.http://pascapanen.litbang.deptan.go.id/index.php/berita/55
didownload tanggal: 6 September 2012.
Shahidi, Fereidoon and J.R. Botta. (1994). Seafoods: Chemistry, Processing Technology
and Quality. Blackie Academy and Professional. Glasgow.
Standar Nasional Indonesia. (2006). Penentuan Angka Lempeng Total (ALT) pada
Produk Perikanan. SNI 01-2332.3-2006
Syarief, R. dan H. Halid. (1991). Teknologi Pengolahan Pangan. Arcan.Jakarta
Widyasari, R.A.H.E. (2006). Pengaruh Pengawetan menggunakan Biji Picung
(Pangium edule Reinw) Terhadap Kesegaran dan Keamanan Ikan Kembung
Segar (Rastrelliger brachysoma). Sekolah Pascasarjana Institut Pertanian Bogor.
Bogor (Thesis)
Winarno, F.G; S. Fardiaz dan F.Dedi. (1984). Pengantar Teknologi Pertanian.
PT.Gramedia. Jakarta.
Welt, B.A; D.S. Sage and K.L. Berger. (2003). Performance Spesification of TimeTemperaature Integrators Designed to Protect Against Botulism in Refrigerated
Fresh Food. Journal of Food Science Vol 68(1): 2-9
Zheng, X; Y. Lan; C. Liu; N. Ding and T. Zhao. (2009) Effect of Rice Fissure on Taste
Quality of Cooked Rice. Agricultural Engineering International: the CIGR
Ejournal. Vol XI: Manuscript 1190
44
7. LAMPIRAN
Lampiran 1. Pindang Ikan Tongkol pada Perlakuan Garam dan Ekstrak Rempah
45
46
47
Lampiran 2. Pengamatan Total Plate Count Pindang Ikan Tongkol
48
49
50
51
Lampiran 3. Hasil Analisa Data (Output SPSS)
Oneway
Post Hoc Tests
Homogeneous Subsets
Air_0
Duncan
Subset for alpha = .05
Treatment
Lengkuas
N
6
1
66.2617
2
3
4
Kluwak
6
66.7400
Lengkuas UV
6
66.7433
Kluwak UV
6
67.2200
Garam UV
6
67.7950
67.7950
Kunyit UV
6
68.1550
68.1550
68.1550
Jahe
6
68.2100
68.2100
68.2100
Kunyit
6
68.7050
68.7050
Garam
6
Jahe UV
6
67.2200
68.9483
68.9533
Sig.
.068
.059
Means for groups in homogeneous subsets are displayed.
a Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size = 6.000.
.083
T_Air_0
Duncan
Subset for alpha = .05
Treatment
Lengkuas
6
1
66.3333
Kluwak
6
66.6667
Lengkuas UV
6
66.6667
Kluwak UV
6
67.1667
Garam UV
6
68.0000
68.0000
Jahe
6
68.1667
68.1667
Kunyit UV
6
68.1667
68.1667
Kunyit
6
68.6667
Garam
6
69.0000
Jahe UV
6
69.0000
Sig.
N
2
3
67.1667
.115
.058
Means for groups in homogeneous subsets are displayed.
a Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size = 6.000.
.069
.138
52
TVN_0
Duncan
Subset for alpha = .05
Treatment
Garam UV
N
6
1
165.54550
2
Garam
6
165.66950
Kunyit
6
168.20900
Jahe
6
168.29200
Jahe UV
6
168.35533
Kunyit UV
6
169.26100
Lengkuas
6
177.00517
Lengkuas UV
6
177.07650
Kluwak
6
Kluwak UV
6
180.58317
.813
.071
Means for groups in homogeneous subsets are displayed.
a Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size = 6.000.
TMA_0
Duncan
Subset for alpha = .05
6
1
22.19917
Jahe UV
6
22.20650
Lengkuas
6
22.49950
Kluwak
6
22.50450
Lengkuas UV
N
2
6
22.50467
Kluwak UV
6
22.50950
Kunyit UV
6
24.12850
Kunyit
6
24.13483
Garam UV
6
24.76767
Garam
6
24.78133
Sig.
4
180.52933
Sig.
Treatment
Jahe
3
.593
.241
Means for groups in homogeneous subsets are displayed.
a Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size = 6.000.
.892
.918
53
Hard_0
Duncan
Subset for alpha = .05
Treatment
Jahe
N
6
1
874.15083
Jahe UV
6
874.15083
Lengkuas
6
884.96967
Lengkuas UV
6
884.96967
Kluwak
6
932.98733
Kluwak UV
6
932.98733
Kunyit
2
1047.9946
7
1047.9946
7
6
Kunyit UV
6
Garam
3
6
Garam UV
6
Sig.
.070
1.000
Means for groups in homogeneous subsets are displayed.
a Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size = 6.000.
1.000
4
1143.5201
7
1143.5201
7
1.000
Spring_0
Duncan
Subset for alpha = .05
Treatment
Lengkuas
N
1
2
3
6
2.51550
Lengkuas UV
6
2.51550
Kunyit
6
2.55667
Kunyit UV
6
2.55667
Kluwak
6
3.02500
Kluwak UV
6
3.02500
Jahe
6
3.32717
Jahe UV
6
3.32717
Garam
6
Garam UV
6
Sig.
4
3.77483
3.77483
.784
1.000
Means for groups in homogeneous subsets are displayed.
a Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size = 6.000.
1.000
1.000
54
TPC_0
Duncan
Subset for alpha = .05
Treatment
Jahe UV
N
6
1
5.45017
2
3
Jahe
6
5.45033
Lengkuas
6
5.47600
Lengkuas UV
6
5.47600
Kunyit
6
5.70717
Kunyit UV
6
5.70717
Garam UV
6
5.72283
Garam
6
5.74517
Kluwak
6
6.45017
Kluwak UV
6
6.45017
Sig.
.640
.491
Means for groups in homogeneous subsets are displayed.
a Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size = 6.000.
Air_3
1.000
Duncan
Subset for alpha = .05
Treatment
Kluwak
6
1
65.5533
Lengkuas
6
66.2300
66.2300
Kunyit
6
66.7483
66.7483
66.7483
Jahe
6
66.8883
66.8883
66.8883
Garam UV
6
67.6783
67.6783
67.6783
Garam
6
67.9250
67.9250
67.9250
Kluwak UV
6
68.4983
68.4983
Jahe UV
6
69.5667
69.5667
Kunyit UV
6
69.5917
69.5917
Lengkuas UV
6
Sig.
N
2
.181
.097
Means for groups in homogeneous subsets are displayed.
a Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size = 6.000.
3
4
5
70.6900
.086
.060
.243
55
TVN_3
Duncan
Treatmen
t
Garam
Kunyit
Kluwak
Jahe
Lengkuas
Jahe UV
Kunyit
UV
Lengkuas
UV
Kluwak
UV
Garam
UV
Sig.
Subset for alpha = .05
N
6
1
135.51
900
6
6
6
2
143.80
883
3
4
151.04
483
152.00
217
6
157.82
467
6
5
170.40
717
6
6
7
178.22
650
182.41
033
6
6
8
193.44
067
6
1.000
1.000
.281
1.000
Means for groups in homogeneous subsets are displayed.
a Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size = 6.000.
1.000
1.000
1.000
1.000
9
196.56
833
1.000
TMA_3
Duncan
Subset for alpha = .05
Treatment
Jahe UV
6
1
31.23500
Lengkuas
6
31.47067
Lengkuas UV
6
35.13867
Kunyit
6
36.00750
Kluwak UV
6
Jahe
6
39.44800
Kunyit UV
6
40.73767
Garam
6
42.84050
Kluwak
6
42.91967
Garam UV
6
Sig.
N
2
.725
.198
Means for groups in homogeneous subsets are displayed.
a Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size = 6.000.
3
4
5
6
38.03400
46.36850
1.000
.059
.906
1.000
56
Hard_3
Duncan
Subset for alpha = .05
Treatment
Kluwak
Jahe
Kunyit
Garam
Garam UV
Lengkuas
Lengkuas
UV
Jahe UV
Kluwak UV
Kunyit UV
N
6
6
1
741.094
50
742.698
00
6
6
2
895.409
67
899.709
17
6
3
949.521
00
6
4
5
1139.26
650
6
6
1167.31
417
6
1588.86
383
6
.759
.412
1.000
1.000
1.000
1.000
Means for groups in homogeneous subsets are displayed.
a Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size = 6.000.
Spring_3
Duncan
Subset for alpha = .05
N
1
6
2
3
4
2.47500
Lengkuas UV
6
2.75083
Kunyit UV
6
2.83667
Lengkuas
6
2.86650
Jahe UV
6
3.11850
Kluwak UV
6
3.12600
Kluwak
6
3.18283
Jahe
6
3.27867
Garam
6
Garam UV
6
Sig.
1735.97
367
6
Sig.
Treatment
Kunyit
7
3.53900
3.60350
1.000
.346
Means for groups in homogeneous subsets are displayed.
a Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size = 6.000.
.208
.575
1.000
8
2437.15
200
1.000
57
TPC_3
Duncan
Subset for alpha = .05
Treatment
Kluwak
N
6
1
6.74083
2
3
4
5
Garam UV
6
6.79117
Jahe UV
6
7.03317
Garam
6
7.12517
Kunyit UV
6
7.20883
7.20883
Kluwak UV
6
7.26850
7.26850
7.26850
Lengkuas UV
6
7.29183
7.29183
7.29183
Kunyit
6
7.31300
7.31300
Lengkuas
6
Jahe
6
7.12517
7.40400
.539
.264
Means for groups in homogeneous subsets are displayed.
a Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size = 6.000.
.066
.251
Air_7
Duncan
Subset for alpha = .05
6
1
55.7650
Jahe
6
56.3467
Garam
6
56.5533
Kunyit
6
56.9467
6
57.2650
Lengkuas
N
2
3
4
Kluwak UV
6
69.3167
Lengkuas UV
6
71.0133
Jahe UV
6
71.2017
Garam UV
6
71.2783
Kunyit UV
6
Sig.
7.40400
7.51500
Sig.
Treatment
Kluwak
6
.120
.050
Means for groups in homogeneous subsets are displayed.
a Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size = 6.000.
71.0133
73.6600
.771
1.000
.135
.179
58
T_Air_7
Duncan
Subset for alpha = .05
Treatment
Kluwak
N
6
1
.6486
2
3
Jahe
6
.6538
Garam
6
.6556
Kunyit
6
.6591
Lengkuas
6
.6617
Kluwak UV
6
.7592
Lengkuas UV
6
.7716
Jahe UV
6
.7731
Garam UV
6
.7734
Kunyit UV
6
.7904
.079
.052
Means for groups in homogeneous subsets are displayed.
a Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size = 6.000.
1.000
Sig.
TVN_7
Duncan
Subset for alpha = .05
Treatment
Jahe UV
Kunyit
Lengkuas
UV
Kunyit UV
Garam
Lengkuas
Kluwak UV
Kluwak
Jahe
Garam UV
Sig.
N
6
6
1
174.080
50
175.018
17
6
2
186.496
33
6
6
3
188.916
17
189.350
83
6
4
195.458
17
6
5
207.793
17
6
6
213.404
83
6
7
221.797
33
6
.306
1.000
.634
Means for groups in homogeneous subsets are displayed.
a Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size = 6.000.
1.000
1.000
1.000
1.000
8
227.496
50
1.000
59
TMA_7
Duncan
Treatmen
t
Jahe UV
Subset for alpha = .05
N
6
Lengkuas
UV
Kluwak
UV
Kunyit
1
38.767
50
6
6
2
3
51.601
17
53.013
33
56.430
83
6
Kunyit UV
4
58.756
83
6
Garam
UV
Garam
5
6
6
65.522
83
6
Lengkuas
7
78.244
50
6
Jahe
8
80.616
00
6
Kluwak
92.422
17
1.000
1.000
95.913
50
1.000
8
9
10
6
Sig.
1.000
.130
1.000
1.000
Means for groups in homogeneous subsets are displayed.
a Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size = 6.000.
Hard_7
1.000
1.000
9
Duncan
Treatme
nt
Lengkua
s UV
Kunyit
UV
Jahe UV
Kunyit
Jahe
Garam
UV
Garam
Lengkua
s
Kluwak
UV
Kluwak
Sig.
Subset for alpha = .05
N
6
6
6
6
6
1
1083.
89300
2
1333.
00700
3
1358.
02600
4
1948.
39900
5
2009.
11317
6
6
2153.
64817
6
7
2464.
72100
6
2714.
29617
6
2853.
79017
6
1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000
Means for groups in homogeneous subsets are displayed.
a Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size = 6.000.
1.000
1.000
1.000
1.000
3134.
08117
1.000
60
Spring_7
Duncan
Subset for alpha = .05
Treatment
Lengkuas UV
N
6
1
2.97717
2
3
4
Kunyit UV
6
3.02483
3.02483
Kunyit
6
3.10083
3.10083
Lengkuas
6
3.15100
3.15100
Jahe UV
6
3.15417
3.15417
Garam UV
6
3.27983
3.27983
Kluwak UV
6
3.32317
3.32317
Kluwak
6
Jahe
6
Garam
6
3.55000
5
3.55000
3.65583
4.16767
Sig.
.239
.050
Means for groups in homogeneous subsets are displayed.
a Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size = 6.000.
.057
.425
TPC_7
Duncan
Subset for alpha = .05
Treatment
Kluwak
6
1
7.20400
Kunyit UV
6
7.29383
Kunyit
6
Jahe UV
6
7.47433
Garam
N
2
3
4
7.29383
7.44150
7.44150
6
7.48917
Kluwak UV
6
7.49117
Garam UV
6
7.50183
Lengkuas UV
6
7.50883
Jahe
6
7.60800
Lengkuas
6
Sig.
.241
.057
Means for groups in homogeneous subsets are displayed.
a Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size = 6.000.
7.60800
7.72100
.061
.142
1.000