s fis 0705413 bibliography
DAFTAR PUSTAKA
Adair, John. (2007). Decision Making & Problem Solving Strategies. London:
Kogan Page.
Anderson, L. W. & Krathwohl, D. R. (eds). (2001). A Taxonomy for Learning
Teaching and Assessing. A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of education
Objectives. New York: Addisin Wesley.
Anderson, D. dan Nashon, S. (2006). “Predators of Knowledge Construction:
Interpreting Students’ Metacognition in an Amusement Park Physics
Program”. Wiley InterScience. Tersedia: http//www.interscience.wiley.co.
Arends, R. L. (1997). Classroom Instruction and Management. New York:
McGraw-Hill Book Co.
. (2004). Learning to Teach. 5th Ed. Boston: McGraw Hill
. (2008a). Learning to Teach. Buku I. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Belajar.
. (2008b). Learning to Teach. Buku II. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Belajar.
Baser, M. (2006). Effect of Conceptual Change Oriented Instruction on Students’
Understanding of Heat and Temperature Concepts. Journal Maltese
Education
Research.
Vol:4
No.1
2006
64-79.
Tersedia:
www.educ.um.edu.mt/jmer.
Borg, W. R. & Gall, M. D. (1989). Educational Research. 4st Edition. New York:
Longman, Inc.
Campbell, J. (2007). “Using Metacogs to Collaborate with Students to Improve
Teaching
and
Learning
in
Physics”.
Tersedia
http://www.ccfi.educ.ubc.ca/publication/insight/v11n02/articles/campbell.
html
Cartwright, C. A. & Cartwright, G. P. (1984). Developing Observation Skills. 2nd
Ed. McGraw-Hill Book Company.
Costa, A.L. (ed). (1985). Developing Minds, A Resource Book for Teaching
Thinking. Alexandria: ASCD.
166
Crocker, L. & Algina, J. (1986). Introduction to Classical and Modern Test
Theory, New York: CBS College Publishing.
Dahar, R.W. (1996) Teori-teori belajar. Jakarta: Erlangga.
Desoete, A., (2007). “Evaluating and improving the mathematics teachinglearning process through metacognitiaon”. Electronic Journal of Research
in Educational Psychology. 5, (13), 705-730.
Desoete, A., Roeyers, H., dan Buysse, A. (2001). “Metacognition and
Mathematical Problem Solving in Grade 3”. Journal of Learning
Disabilities. 34, (5), 435-449.
Dori, Y. I & Belcher, J. (2005). “How does technology-enabled active learning
affect undergraduate students’ understanding of electromagnetism
concepts”. The journal of learning science. 14, (2). 243-279. Tersedia:
http://web.mit.edu/.[26 September 2007].
Escalada, L., & Zollman, D. A., (1997). “An Investigation on the Effects of Using
Interactive Digital Video in a Physics Classroom on Student Learning and
Attitudes”. Journal of research in science teaching. 34, (5). 467–489.
Gaigher, E., Rogan J. M. and Braun, M. W. H. (2007). “Exploring the
Development of Conceptual Understanding through Structured Problemsolving in Physics”. International Journal of Science Education. 29, (9),
1089–1110.
Garritz, A. (2010). Pedagogical Content Knowledge and the Affective domain of
Scholarship of Teaching and Learning. International Journal for the
Scholarship of Teaching and Learning. Vol. 4, No. 2 (July 2010). ISSN
1931-4744. Tersedia: http://www.georgiasouthern.edu/ijsotl.
Giancoli, D. C. (2001). Physics: Principles with Applications, Fifth Edition. New
Jersey: Prentice Hall International.
Gok, T. (2010). “The general Assessment of Problem Solving Processes and
Metacognition in Physics Education”. Eurasian Journal Physics Chemical
Education. 2,(2).110-122.
Grinnel, Jr., R. M. (1988). Social Work Research and Evaluation. Illionis: F.E.
Peacock Pub. Inc.
Guilford, J. P. and Fruchter, B. (1978). Fundamental Statistic in Psychology and
Education. Singapure: McGraw-Hill.
Guskey T. R. & Marzano, R. J. (2001). Scoring Rubrics in The Classroom. Using
Performance Criteria for Assessing and Improving Student Performance.
167
Corwin Press, INC. A Sage Publications Company Thousand Oaks,
California.
Heller, K., & Heller, P. (1999). Problem-Solving Labs. Introductory Physics I
Mechanics. Cooperative Group problem-solving in physics.
Henderson, C., & Kuo, V. (2001). Instructors’ Ideas about Problem Solving –
Setting Goals. Proceedings of
the
Physics Education Research
Conference, Rochester, NY.
Hestenes, D. & Wells, M. (1997). Mechanics Baseline Test.
Hollingworth, R. & McLoughlin. (2002). The Development of Metacognitive
Skilss
among
Firts
Year
Science
Student.
Tersedia
http://fyhe.Qut.Edu.au./FYHE-Previous/Papers/HollingworthPaper.doc.
Israel, S. E., Block, C. C., Bauserman, K. L., Kinnucan-Welsch (Ed). (2005).
Metacognition in Literacy Learning. Theory, Assessment, Instruction, and
Professional Development. Laurence Erlbaum Associates, Publisher.
Mahwah, New Jersey. London.
Joice, B., Weil, M., & Calhoun, E. (2008). Models of Teaching. Yogyakarta:
Pustaka Belajar.
Jennifer L. (2006). Physics Problem Solving. University of Minnesota.
Kaplan & Saccuzzo. (2005). Psychological Testing. USA: Thomson Wadsworth.
Kipnis, M. dan Hofstein, A. (2007). “The Inquiry Laboratory as a Source for
Development of Metacognitive Skills”. International Journal of Science
and Mathematics Education.
Kuo, V. (2004). An explanatory model of physics faculty conception about the
problem solving process. University of Minnesota: Ph. D. Thesis.
Kuhn, D. & Dean, D. Jr. (2004). Metacognitive: A Bridge between Cognitive
Psycology and Educational Practice. Theory Into Practice. Volume 43.
No. 4.
Lorenzo, M. (2005). The Development, Implementation, and Evaluation of a
Problem Solving Heuristic. International Journal of Science and
Mathematics Education, 3: 33–58.
Livingston, J.A. (1997). Metacognition: An Overview Unpublished manuscript,
State University of New York at Buffalo.
168
Malone, L. K. (2006a). A comparative Study of the Cognitive and Metacognitive
between Modeling and Non-Modeling High School Physics Students.
Thesis.
Malone, L. K. (2006b). “The convergence of knowledge organization, problemsolving behavior, and metacognition research with the Modeling Method
of physics instruction” – Part I. Journal Physics Teacher Education.
Online, 4(1).
_____. (2007). “The convergence of knowledge organization, problem-solving
behavior, and metacognition research with the Modeling Method of
physics instruction” – Part II. Journal Physics Teacher Education.
www.phy.ilstu.edu/jpteo. 4, (2).
Marzano, R. J. (2006). Classroom Assessment & Grading that Work. Association
for Supervision and Curriculum Development. Alexandria, Virginia USA.
Marzano, R. J., Brandt, R. S Hughes, C. S., Jones, B. F., Presseisen, B. Z.,
Rankin, S. C., Suhor (1998). Dimensions of Thinking: Framework for
Curriculum and Instruction. CUSO: ASCD.
Matlin, M. E. (2009). Cognitive Psychology. Seventh Edition. International
Student Version. Jhon Wiley & Sons, Inc.
_______ (2003). Cognition. Fifth Edition. Jhon Wiley & Sons, Inc.
McGregor, D. (2007). Developing Thinking Developing Learning : A Guide to
Thinking Skills in Education Berkshire: Open University Press, Mc GrawHill.
Mehrens & Lehmann. (1984). Measurement and Evaluation in Education and
Psychology. New York: New York: CBS College Publishing.
Meltzer, D. E. (2002). “The Relationshif between Mathematics Preparation and
Conceptual Learning Gain in Physics: A Possible Hidden Variable in
Diagnostic
Pretest
Score”.
Am.J.Phys.70,(2),1259-1267.[Online].
Tersedia: w.physic.lastate.edu/per/does/addendum_on_normalizedgain.
[10 Februari 2008].
National Research Council (2000). Inquiry and the National Science Education
Standards: A Guide for Teaching and Learning. [Online]. Tersedia:
http://books.nap.edu/html/inquiry_addendum/notice.html. [9 Oktober
2001].
National Research Council (1996). Inquiry and the National Science Education.
Washington DC: National Academic Press.
169
Ornek, F., Robinson, W. R., & Haugan, M. P. (2008). What Makes Physics
Difficult? International Journal of Environmental & Science Education.
2008. 3(1).
Panaoura, A. & Philippou, G. (2004) The Measurement of Young Pupils’
Metacognitive Ability in Mathematics: The Case of Self-Representation
and Self-Evaluation. In Journal CERME 4 [Online] Provided:
http://Cerme4.crm.es/papers%20 definities /2/ panaoura.philippou.pdf
Panaoura, A. & Panaoura, G. (2006) Cognitive and Metacognitive Performance
on Mathematics. [Online]. Provided : http:/self.uws.edu.au/conferences/
2004 panaoura. philippou
Perfect, T. J. & Schwartz, B. L. (2002). Applied Metacognition. Cambridge
University Press.
Phang, F. A. (2006). The Patterns of Physics Problem-Solving From the
Perspective of Metacognition. Master dissertation, University of
Cambridge.
Retrieved:
http://people.pwf.cam.ac.ok./kst/24/ResearchStudents/Abdullah2006metacognition.pdf
Pretz, J.E., Naples, A., & Sternberg, R.J. (2003). Recognizing, Defining, and
Representing Problems dalam Davidson & Sternberg (Eds). The
Psychology of Problem Solving. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Priyatno, D. (2009). Lima jam Belajar Olah Data dengan SPSS 17. Penerbit Andi
Yogyakarta
Ruseffendi, H. E. T. (1998). Dasar-dasar Penelitian Pendidikan dan Bidang
Noneksakta Lainnya. Semarang: IKIP Semarang.
Rutherford, F. J. & Ahlgren, A. (1990). Science for All Americans. New York:
Oxford University Press.
Saleh, S. (2011). The Level of B.Sc.Ed Students’ Conceptual Understanding of
Newtonian Physics. International Journal of Academic Research in
Business and Social Sciences October 2011, Vol. 1, No. 3 ISSN: 22226990
Santyasa, I. W. (2006). Pengembangan Pemahaman Konsep dan Kemampuan
Pemecahan Masalah Fisika bagi Siswa SMA dengan Pemberdayaan Model
Perubahan Konseptual Berseting Investigasi Kelompok.
170
Schraw, G. & Moshman, D. (1995). Metacognitive Theories. Educational
Psychology, Departement of Educational Psychology Papers and
Publications. http://www.springerlink.com/content/1040-726X.
Selçuk, G. S., Çalı kan, S., dan Erol, M. (2008). “The Effects of Problem solving
Instruction on Physics Achievement, Problem Solving Performance and
Strategy Use”. Lat. Am. J. Phys. Educ. 2, (3). 151-166.
http://www.journal.lapen.org.mx
Slavin, R. E. (2000). Educational Psychology: Thoery and Practice. Sixth
Edition. Boston: Allyn and Bacon Publisher.
Slavin, R. E. (1994). Educational Psychology: Theories and Practies. Fourth
Edition. Massachusetts: Allyn and Bacon Publisher.
Solaz-Portolés, J. J. & Sanjosé, V. (2007). Representation in Problem Solving in
Science: Direction for Practice. Asia Pasific Forum Science Learning and
Teaching. Volume 8, Issue 2, Article 4, p.1.
Solaz-Portolés, J.J. & Sanjosé, V. (2007). “Cognitive variables in science problem
solving: A review of research”. Journal Physics Teacher Education.
www.phy.ilstu.edu/jpteo. 4, (2).
Sugiyono, (2008). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R & D. Bandung:
Alfabeta.
______ , (2006). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan: Pendekatan Kuantitatif,
Kualitatif, dan R & D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Sukmadinata, N.S. (2007). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan. Bandung: PT Remaja
Rosdakarya.
Sukmadinata, N. S. (2004). Pengembangan Kurikulum, Teori dan Praktek.
Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
Supranata, S. (2006) Analitis, Validitas, Reliabilitas, dan Interpretasi Hasil Tes.
Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
Tan, O. S. (2004). Enhanching Thinking Problem Based Learning Approached.
Singapura: Thomson.
Teese, R. (2007). Video Analysis - A Multimedia Tool for Homework and Class
Assignments. 12th International Conference on Multimedia in Physics
Teaching and Learning, 13-15 September 2007, Wroclaw, Poland.
171
Thiagarajan, S., Semmel, D. S. & Semmel, M. (1974). Instructional Development
for Training Teachers of
Exceptional Children. Source Book.
Bloominton: Center for Innovation on Teaching the Handicapped.
Thomas, G., Anderson, D. and Nashon, S. (2008). “Development of an Instrument
Designed to Investigate Elements of Science Students’ Metacognition,
Self-Efficacy and Learning Processes: The SEMLI-S”. International
Journal of Science Education. 30, (13), (17). 1701–1724.
Ronald K. Thornton, R. K. & Sokoloff, D. R. (1998). “Assessing student learning
of Newton’s laws: The Force and Motion Conceptual Evaluation and the
Evaluation of Active Learning Laboratory and Lecture Curricula”. Am. J.
Phys. 66, (4). 338-352.
Tipler, P. A. (1991). Fisika untuk Sains dan Teknik. Jilid 1. PT. Gelora Aksara
Pratama. Penerbit Erlangga.
Wagner A., Altherr, S., Eckert, B., and Jodl, H. J. (2006). Multimedia in physics
education: a video for the quantitative analysis of the centrifugal force and
the Coriolis force. Eur. J. Phys. 27 (2006) L27–L30.
Weinert, F. E. and Kluwe, R. H. (1987). Metacognition, Motivation, and
Understanding. The Psycholigy of education and Instruction. Lawrence
Erlbaum Associates, Publishers Hillsdale, New Jersey. London.
Weisberg, R.W. (2006). Creativity: Understanding Innovation in Problem
Solving, Science, Invention, and the Arts. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons,
Inc.
Wenning, C. J. and Wenning, R. E. (2006). “A generic model for inquiry-oriented
lab in postsecondary introductory physics”. Journal of Physics Teacher
Education Online. 3(3). 24-33. Available at: http://www.phy.ilstu.
edu/jpteo
Winn, W. and Snyder, D. (1998). Metacognition. Graduate Student, SDSU
Depart-ment of Educational Technology
Yürük, N. (2007). “A Case Study of one Student’s Metaconteptual Process and
the Changes in Her Alternative Conceptions of Force and Motion”.
Eurasia Journal, Sciences & Technology Education. 3, (4). 305-325.
Zainul, A. (2008). Asesmen Sumatif dan Formatif. Makalah. PPs UPI. Bandung:
tidak diterbitkan.
Zollman, D. A. (2001). Modeling Real World Events and Video Data Collection.
http://www.phys.ksu.edu/perg.
172
173
Adair, John. (2007). Decision Making & Problem Solving Strategies. London:
Kogan Page.
Anderson, L. W. & Krathwohl, D. R. (eds). (2001). A Taxonomy for Learning
Teaching and Assessing. A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of education
Objectives. New York: Addisin Wesley.
Anderson, D. dan Nashon, S. (2006). “Predators of Knowledge Construction:
Interpreting Students’ Metacognition in an Amusement Park Physics
Program”. Wiley InterScience. Tersedia: http//www.interscience.wiley.co.
Arends, R. L. (1997). Classroom Instruction and Management. New York:
McGraw-Hill Book Co.
. (2004). Learning to Teach. 5th Ed. Boston: McGraw Hill
. (2008a). Learning to Teach. Buku I. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Belajar.
. (2008b). Learning to Teach. Buku II. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Belajar.
Baser, M. (2006). Effect of Conceptual Change Oriented Instruction on Students’
Understanding of Heat and Temperature Concepts. Journal Maltese
Education
Research.
Vol:4
No.1
2006
64-79.
Tersedia:
www.educ.um.edu.mt/jmer.
Borg, W. R. & Gall, M. D. (1989). Educational Research. 4st Edition. New York:
Longman, Inc.
Campbell, J. (2007). “Using Metacogs to Collaborate with Students to Improve
Teaching
and
Learning
in
Physics”.
Tersedia
http://www.ccfi.educ.ubc.ca/publication/insight/v11n02/articles/campbell.
html
Cartwright, C. A. & Cartwright, G. P. (1984). Developing Observation Skills. 2nd
Ed. McGraw-Hill Book Company.
Costa, A.L. (ed). (1985). Developing Minds, A Resource Book for Teaching
Thinking. Alexandria: ASCD.
166
Crocker, L. & Algina, J. (1986). Introduction to Classical and Modern Test
Theory, New York: CBS College Publishing.
Dahar, R.W. (1996) Teori-teori belajar. Jakarta: Erlangga.
Desoete, A., (2007). “Evaluating and improving the mathematics teachinglearning process through metacognitiaon”. Electronic Journal of Research
in Educational Psychology. 5, (13), 705-730.
Desoete, A., Roeyers, H., dan Buysse, A. (2001). “Metacognition and
Mathematical Problem Solving in Grade 3”. Journal of Learning
Disabilities. 34, (5), 435-449.
Dori, Y. I & Belcher, J. (2005). “How does technology-enabled active learning
affect undergraduate students’ understanding of electromagnetism
concepts”. The journal of learning science. 14, (2). 243-279. Tersedia:
http://web.mit.edu/.[26 September 2007].
Escalada, L., & Zollman, D. A., (1997). “An Investigation on the Effects of Using
Interactive Digital Video in a Physics Classroom on Student Learning and
Attitudes”. Journal of research in science teaching. 34, (5). 467–489.
Gaigher, E., Rogan J. M. and Braun, M. W. H. (2007). “Exploring the
Development of Conceptual Understanding through Structured Problemsolving in Physics”. International Journal of Science Education. 29, (9),
1089–1110.
Garritz, A. (2010). Pedagogical Content Knowledge and the Affective domain of
Scholarship of Teaching and Learning. International Journal for the
Scholarship of Teaching and Learning. Vol. 4, No. 2 (July 2010). ISSN
1931-4744. Tersedia: http://www.georgiasouthern.edu/ijsotl.
Giancoli, D. C. (2001). Physics: Principles with Applications, Fifth Edition. New
Jersey: Prentice Hall International.
Gok, T. (2010). “The general Assessment of Problem Solving Processes and
Metacognition in Physics Education”. Eurasian Journal Physics Chemical
Education. 2,(2).110-122.
Grinnel, Jr., R. M. (1988). Social Work Research and Evaluation. Illionis: F.E.
Peacock Pub. Inc.
Guilford, J. P. and Fruchter, B. (1978). Fundamental Statistic in Psychology and
Education. Singapure: McGraw-Hill.
Guskey T. R. & Marzano, R. J. (2001). Scoring Rubrics in The Classroom. Using
Performance Criteria for Assessing and Improving Student Performance.
167
Corwin Press, INC. A Sage Publications Company Thousand Oaks,
California.
Heller, K., & Heller, P. (1999). Problem-Solving Labs. Introductory Physics I
Mechanics. Cooperative Group problem-solving in physics.
Henderson, C., & Kuo, V. (2001). Instructors’ Ideas about Problem Solving –
Setting Goals. Proceedings of
the
Physics Education Research
Conference, Rochester, NY.
Hestenes, D. & Wells, M. (1997). Mechanics Baseline Test.
Hollingworth, R. & McLoughlin. (2002). The Development of Metacognitive
Skilss
among
Firts
Year
Science
Student.
Tersedia
http://fyhe.Qut.Edu.au./FYHE-Previous/Papers/HollingworthPaper.doc.
Israel, S. E., Block, C. C., Bauserman, K. L., Kinnucan-Welsch (Ed). (2005).
Metacognition in Literacy Learning. Theory, Assessment, Instruction, and
Professional Development. Laurence Erlbaum Associates, Publisher.
Mahwah, New Jersey. London.
Joice, B., Weil, M., & Calhoun, E. (2008). Models of Teaching. Yogyakarta:
Pustaka Belajar.
Jennifer L. (2006). Physics Problem Solving. University of Minnesota.
Kaplan & Saccuzzo. (2005). Psychological Testing. USA: Thomson Wadsworth.
Kipnis, M. dan Hofstein, A. (2007). “The Inquiry Laboratory as a Source for
Development of Metacognitive Skills”. International Journal of Science
and Mathematics Education.
Kuo, V. (2004). An explanatory model of physics faculty conception about the
problem solving process. University of Minnesota: Ph. D. Thesis.
Kuhn, D. & Dean, D. Jr. (2004). Metacognitive: A Bridge between Cognitive
Psycology and Educational Practice. Theory Into Practice. Volume 43.
No. 4.
Lorenzo, M. (2005). The Development, Implementation, and Evaluation of a
Problem Solving Heuristic. International Journal of Science and
Mathematics Education, 3: 33–58.
Livingston, J.A. (1997). Metacognition: An Overview Unpublished manuscript,
State University of New York at Buffalo.
168
Malone, L. K. (2006a). A comparative Study of the Cognitive and Metacognitive
between Modeling and Non-Modeling High School Physics Students.
Thesis.
Malone, L. K. (2006b). “The convergence of knowledge organization, problemsolving behavior, and metacognition research with the Modeling Method
of physics instruction” – Part I. Journal Physics Teacher Education.
Online, 4(1).
_____. (2007). “The convergence of knowledge organization, problem-solving
behavior, and metacognition research with the Modeling Method of
physics instruction” – Part II. Journal Physics Teacher Education.
www.phy.ilstu.edu/jpteo. 4, (2).
Marzano, R. J. (2006). Classroom Assessment & Grading that Work. Association
for Supervision and Curriculum Development. Alexandria, Virginia USA.
Marzano, R. J., Brandt, R. S Hughes, C. S., Jones, B. F., Presseisen, B. Z.,
Rankin, S. C., Suhor (1998). Dimensions of Thinking: Framework for
Curriculum and Instruction. CUSO: ASCD.
Matlin, M. E. (2009). Cognitive Psychology. Seventh Edition. International
Student Version. Jhon Wiley & Sons, Inc.
_______ (2003). Cognition. Fifth Edition. Jhon Wiley & Sons, Inc.
McGregor, D. (2007). Developing Thinking Developing Learning : A Guide to
Thinking Skills in Education Berkshire: Open University Press, Mc GrawHill.
Mehrens & Lehmann. (1984). Measurement and Evaluation in Education and
Psychology. New York: New York: CBS College Publishing.
Meltzer, D. E. (2002). “The Relationshif between Mathematics Preparation and
Conceptual Learning Gain in Physics: A Possible Hidden Variable in
Diagnostic
Pretest
Score”.
Am.J.Phys.70,(2),1259-1267.[Online].
Tersedia: w.physic.lastate.edu/per/does/addendum_on_normalizedgain.
[10 Februari 2008].
National Research Council (2000). Inquiry and the National Science Education
Standards: A Guide for Teaching and Learning. [Online]. Tersedia:
http://books.nap.edu/html/inquiry_addendum/notice.html. [9 Oktober
2001].
National Research Council (1996). Inquiry and the National Science Education.
Washington DC: National Academic Press.
169
Ornek, F., Robinson, W. R., & Haugan, M. P. (2008). What Makes Physics
Difficult? International Journal of Environmental & Science Education.
2008. 3(1).
Panaoura, A. & Philippou, G. (2004) The Measurement of Young Pupils’
Metacognitive Ability in Mathematics: The Case of Self-Representation
and Self-Evaluation. In Journal CERME 4 [Online] Provided:
http://Cerme4.crm.es/papers%20 definities /2/ panaoura.philippou.pdf
Panaoura, A. & Panaoura, G. (2006) Cognitive and Metacognitive Performance
on Mathematics. [Online]. Provided : http:/self.uws.edu.au/conferences/
2004 panaoura. philippou
Perfect, T. J. & Schwartz, B. L. (2002). Applied Metacognition. Cambridge
University Press.
Phang, F. A. (2006). The Patterns of Physics Problem-Solving From the
Perspective of Metacognition. Master dissertation, University of
Cambridge.
Retrieved:
http://people.pwf.cam.ac.ok./kst/24/ResearchStudents/Abdullah2006metacognition.pdf
Pretz, J.E., Naples, A., & Sternberg, R.J. (2003). Recognizing, Defining, and
Representing Problems dalam Davidson & Sternberg (Eds). The
Psychology of Problem Solving. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Priyatno, D. (2009). Lima jam Belajar Olah Data dengan SPSS 17. Penerbit Andi
Yogyakarta
Ruseffendi, H. E. T. (1998). Dasar-dasar Penelitian Pendidikan dan Bidang
Noneksakta Lainnya. Semarang: IKIP Semarang.
Rutherford, F. J. & Ahlgren, A. (1990). Science for All Americans. New York:
Oxford University Press.
Saleh, S. (2011). The Level of B.Sc.Ed Students’ Conceptual Understanding of
Newtonian Physics. International Journal of Academic Research in
Business and Social Sciences October 2011, Vol. 1, No. 3 ISSN: 22226990
Santyasa, I. W. (2006). Pengembangan Pemahaman Konsep dan Kemampuan
Pemecahan Masalah Fisika bagi Siswa SMA dengan Pemberdayaan Model
Perubahan Konseptual Berseting Investigasi Kelompok.
170
Schraw, G. & Moshman, D. (1995). Metacognitive Theories. Educational
Psychology, Departement of Educational Psychology Papers and
Publications. http://www.springerlink.com/content/1040-726X.
Selçuk, G. S., Çalı kan, S., dan Erol, M. (2008). “The Effects of Problem solving
Instruction on Physics Achievement, Problem Solving Performance and
Strategy Use”. Lat. Am. J. Phys. Educ. 2, (3). 151-166.
http://www.journal.lapen.org.mx
Slavin, R. E. (2000). Educational Psychology: Thoery and Practice. Sixth
Edition. Boston: Allyn and Bacon Publisher.
Slavin, R. E. (1994). Educational Psychology: Theories and Practies. Fourth
Edition. Massachusetts: Allyn and Bacon Publisher.
Solaz-Portolés, J. J. & Sanjosé, V. (2007). Representation in Problem Solving in
Science: Direction for Practice. Asia Pasific Forum Science Learning and
Teaching. Volume 8, Issue 2, Article 4, p.1.
Solaz-Portolés, J.J. & Sanjosé, V. (2007). “Cognitive variables in science problem
solving: A review of research”. Journal Physics Teacher Education.
www.phy.ilstu.edu/jpteo. 4, (2).
Sugiyono, (2008). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R & D. Bandung:
Alfabeta.
______ , (2006). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan: Pendekatan Kuantitatif,
Kualitatif, dan R & D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Sukmadinata, N.S. (2007). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan. Bandung: PT Remaja
Rosdakarya.
Sukmadinata, N. S. (2004). Pengembangan Kurikulum, Teori dan Praktek.
Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
Supranata, S. (2006) Analitis, Validitas, Reliabilitas, dan Interpretasi Hasil Tes.
Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
Tan, O. S. (2004). Enhanching Thinking Problem Based Learning Approached.
Singapura: Thomson.
Teese, R. (2007). Video Analysis - A Multimedia Tool for Homework and Class
Assignments. 12th International Conference on Multimedia in Physics
Teaching and Learning, 13-15 September 2007, Wroclaw, Poland.
171
Thiagarajan, S., Semmel, D. S. & Semmel, M. (1974). Instructional Development
for Training Teachers of
Exceptional Children. Source Book.
Bloominton: Center for Innovation on Teaching the Handicapped.
Thomas, G., Anderson, D. and Nashon, S. (2008). “Development of an Instrument
Designed to Investigate Elements of Science Students’ Metacognition,
Self-Efficacy and Learning Processes: The SEMLI-S”. International
Journal of Science Education. 30, (13), (17). 1701–1724.
Ronald K. Thornton, R. K. & Sokoloff, D. R. (1998). “Assessing student learning
of Newton’s laws: The Force and Motion Conceptual Evaluation and the
Evaluation of Active Learning Laboratory and Lecture Curricula”. Am. J.
Phys. 66, (4). 338-352.
Tipler, P. A. (1991). Fisika untuk Sains dan Teknik. Jilid 1. PT. Gelora Aksara
Pratama. Penerbit Erlangga.
Wagner A., Altherr, S., Eckert, B., and Jodl, H. J. (2006). Multimedia in physics
education: a video for the quantitative analysis of the centrifugal force and
the Coriolis force. Eur. J. Phys. 27 (2006) L27–L30.
Weinert, F. E. and Kluwe, R. H. (1987). Metacognition, Motivation, and
Understanding. The Psycholigy of education and Instruction. Lawrence
Erlbaum Associates, Publishers Hillsdale, New Jersey. London.
Weisberg, R.W. (2006). Creativity: Understanding Innovation in Problem
Solving, Science, Invention, and the Arts. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons,
Inc.
Wenning, C. J. and Wenning, R. E. (2006). “A generic model for inquiry-oriented
lab in postsecondary introductory physics”. Journal of Physics Teacher
Education Online. 3(3). 24-33. Available at: http://www.phy.ilstu.
edu/jpteo
Winn, W. and Snyder, D. (1998). Metacognition. Graduate Student, SDSU
Depart-ment of Educational Technology
Yürük, N. (2007). “A Case Study of one Student’s Metaconteptual Process and
the Changes in Her Alternative Conceptions of Force and Motion”.
Eurasia Journal, Sciences & Technology Education. 3, (4). 305-325.
Zainul, A. (2008). Asesmen Sumatif dan Formatif. Makalah. PPs UPI. Bandung:
tidak diterbitkan.
Zollman, D. A. (2001). Modeling Real World Events and Video Data Collection.
http://www.phys.ksu.edu/perg.
172
173