HYDRAULIC ANALYSIS OF THE JOHOR RIVER USING HEC-RAS

  

HYDRAULIC ANALYSIS OF THE JOHOR RIVER

USING HEC-RAS

Dyah Indriana Kusumastuti

Abstract

  

Kota Tinggi located in the southern state of Malaysia, i.e. Johor Baru, experienced severe floods

in December 2006 and January 2007, which was due to prolonged and intense rainfall. Johor

River was inadequate to accommodate the water and at the same time the flow unable to escape

the swolen river, hence water inundated the town. One of the river characteristics that may

contribute in flooding is the meandering shape. Therefore it was proposed to do a hydraulic

model that simulated some alternate channels that straightened some parts of the river. The model

used one dimensional steady state approach using HEC-RAS software. The simulation result of the

existing condition estimated that January 2007 flood event had a return period of 100 years. From

the hydraulic model, it can be concluded that the choice of location and the length of the alternate

channel had an effect on how much water level reduced.

  

Abstrak

  Kota tinggi yang terletak di negara bagian Malaysia bagian selatan, yaitu Johor Baru, mengalami banjir besar pada Desember 2006 dan Januari 2007 yang disebabkan oleh hujan dengan intensitas tinggi dan berdurasi lama. Sungai Johor saat itu tidak mampu menampung air dan pada saat yang bersamaan aliran tidak dapat menghindari air sungai yang sudah membludak, hingga air akhirnya menggenangi kota. Salah satu karakteristik sungai yang memberikan kontribusi dalam kejadian banjir adalah bentuknya yang berkelok. Oleh karenng mensimulasikan a itu diusulkan untuk melakukan pemodelan hidraulika yang mensimulasikan beberapa saluran yang berbentuk lurus di beberapa bagian sungai. Model yang digunakan menggunakan pendekatan steady state satu dimensi menggunakan software HEC-RAS. Hasil simulasi pada kondisi existing menunjukkan bahwa banjir yang terjadi pada Januari 2007 disebabkan oleh kejadian hujan dengan kala ulang 100 tahun. Dari hasil simulasi juga dapat disimpulkan bahwa pemilihan lokasi dan panjang saluran alternatif berdampak terhadap seberapa tinggi air yang tereduksi.

1. INTRODUCTION

  Kota Tinggi experienced severe floods in December 2006 and January 2007, which was due to prolonged and intense rainfall. In December flood event, heavy rain fell in several places in southern Johor for few days, and the highest rainfall recorded was 289 mm which fell on December 19, 2006. At those situations Johor River was inadequate to accommodate the water and at the same time the flow unable to escape the swollen river. Therefore water inundates the neighbouring area of Sungai Johor. Floods have consequences for a wide range of structural, economic, social, and environmental factors. At the period of December 2006 to January 2007, severe floods not only occurred in Malaysia but also in Singapore and Sumatra. The overall losses in these countries are RM 1.5b. Six people were dead as a result from this severe flood in ₁ Malaysia.

  Staf Pengajar Jurusan Teknik Sipil Fakultas Teknik Universitas Lampung Jl. Prof. Sumantri Brojonegoro No 1 Gedong Meneng, Bandar Lampung To understand the hydrology and hydraulic processes which have transformed the rainfall into severe flood disaster as the flood events occurring in Kota Tinggi, a flood model is needed. The flood modeling works include hydrological analysis (Kusumastuti, 2009) and hydraulic analysis. Based on the result of design flood from the hydrology analysis done by Kusumastuti (2009), this paper discusses the hydraulic analysis. Meteorological data has been collected from Bureau of Meteorology and hydraulic data has been collected from JPS and own Survey conducted on 14 and 15 December 2007. The hydraulic model was performed using HEC-RAS software. The HEC-RAS modeling system is a software that allows us to perform one-dimensional steady flow and unsteady flow calculations. HEC-RAS is the US Army Corps of Engineers River Analysis System developed by the Hydrologic Engineering. HEC-RAS is an integrated system of software, designed for interactive use in a multi-tasking, multi-user network environment. The system is comprised of a graphical user interface (GUI), separate hydraulic analysis components, data storage and management capabilities, graphics and reporting facilities. This software is widely used in water resources area, especially in hydraulic analysis and modeling. Some of the works are done by Kusumastuti (2008), Kastamto (2009), Hazarika (2008), Tate dan Maidment (1999). One of the problems of the Johor River is the meandering shape at the downstream section. Because of that, water could not escape the part of the river quickly. When the rain still falls in addition to discharge from the upstream, the river cannot hold the water anymore. Water inundates to the surrounding area and therefore flood happens. Such situation occurred in Kota Tinggi during December 2006 and January 2007 flood events. There was an idea to alter the existing flow route to obtain a straight channel in order to the water flows faster. This study investigates several alternate flows and the impact on reducing water level of the river. The aim of the study is to do hydraulic analysis of the Johor River at existing condition as well as at proposed alternate flows

2. METHODOLOGY

  This study used Steady flow surface profiles in the analysis. Based on available hydraulic data, the hydraulic model was based on a one-dimensioanl steady state computation. HEC-RAS is capable of performing one-dimensional water surface profile calculation for steady gradually varied flow in natural or constructed channels. The model also can be used in the subcritical, supercritical, and mixed flow regime. The equation for basic profile calculation involves cross section subdivision for conveyance calculations; Manning’s n for the main channel; velocity weighting coefficient alpha; and friction loss.

2.1. Equations for basic profile calculations

  Water surface profiles are computed from one cross section to the next by solving the energy equation with an iterative procedure called the standard step method. The energy equation is written as follows. _{2 2}

  α ₂ V α _{2 1} V ₁ Y Z = Y Z h [1] ₂ + + + + + _{2 1 1 e} 2 g 2 g Where : Y ^{1 , Y 2 = depth of water at cross sections}

   Z , Z = elevation of the main channel inverts _{1 2} V ^{1 , V 2 = average velocities (total discharge/total flow area)}

  α , α = velocity weighting coefficients _{1 2} α

   g = gravitational acceleration h e = energy head loss

2.2. Input Data for the Model

2.2.1. Geometric Data

  The study area is Johor River basin with the downstream part of the river as the modeling area (Figure 1). A contour map of Sg Johor Basin (Figure 2 ) was used as a basis to draw the schematic river system. However, the modelling area was confined to the town of Kota Tinggi and down stream until Simpang Empat (Figure 3).

  Modelling area

Figure 1. Sg Johor Basin and the modeling area

  Kota Tinggi bridge Ldg Tanjong Putus

  Sebadan

  Main channel

  Simpang Empat

  Tributary

  P. Kayu Figure 2. Modelling area Figure 3. Schematization of

   (main channel and tributaries) the river system For the modeling purpose, the river system was simplified as in Figure 3 and only major tributary was considered. JPS (Jabatan Pengaliran dan Saliran Malaysia) has carried out detailed survey from Kota Tinggi to Simpang Empat and the grid distance is about 100 meters. Sametime a simple survey was carried out on the 15 December 2007 by the author with two other colleagues from Malaysia to determine the depth and width of the Sg. Johor from Simpang Empat to Kg Panchor(Kuala).

2.2.2. Flow Data (Design Discharge)

  Design discharges with various return periods as calculated in the Flood frequency analysis (Kusumastuti, 2009) were used as flow data input.

3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

  3.1. Existing Condition The simulation used 5 years return period of flood, and the result is presented in Figure 4.

  The elevation of the river bottom is negative assuming that the elevation of the water surface during survey is 0.0 meter. Simulation was done to the section between Kota Tinggi to Simpang Empat.

  Simpang Empat Kota Tinggi _{) 4 6 8} Kota Tinggi-Kuala Plan: Plan 01 _{KtTinggi-Sp4 WS Q 5 y rs Legend Ground E at lev -2 ion (} m _{-6 -4 2 ROB LOB}

• 8 _{2000 4000 6000 8000 10000 12000 Main Channel Distance (m)}

  

Figure 4. Long profile Kota Tinggi – Simpang Empat

Dash lines (legend : LOB and ROB) represent left of bank and right of bank of the river.

  Solid line with dot (legend : ground) is the ground and solid line with no dot (legend : WS Q 5 yrs) represents water surface.

   Proposals for Alternate River Flow 3.2.

  To reduce flood in Kota Tinggi, several alternate flows were proposed to see the impact on flood level. Alternate Channel 1 alters the flow before Kota Tinggi bridge to after Ldg Tanjong Putus into a straight channel. Alternate Channel 2 propose a shorter straight channel after Kota Tinggi bridge until before Ldg Tanjong Putus. Alternate Channel 3 similar to Alternate Channel 2, only it is proposed at the other side of the meandering section.

a. Alternate Channel 1

  Kota Tinggi bridge Ldg Tanjong Putus

  Sebadan Simpang Empat

  P. Kayu

  Figure 5. River schematization with alternate channel 1

  The alternate channel is proposed before Kota Tinggi bridge (Figure 5; represented by red line) in which the alternate flow bypassing the existing flow. The length of the alternate channel is 2.5 km. The result shows that the alternate channel significantly reduces the water level in Kota Tinggi to 1.92 meters (Figure 6). A cross section of the alternate channel is presented in Figure 7, where the elevation of the river bed and river were adopted from the river channel. In Figure 7, bed channel width, top channel width and channel depth are 80 meters, 108 meters, and 9.6 meters respectively.

  Simpang Empat Kota Tinggi _{) 4 6 8} Kota Tinggi-Kuala Plan: Plan 01 _{KotaTinggi2 WS Q 5 y rs Legend Ground E lev -2 at ion (} m _{-6 -4 2 ROB LOB}

• 8 _{2000 4000 6000 8000 10000 Main Channel Distance (m)}

  

Figure 6. Long profile from Kota Tinggi to Simpang Empat using Alternate

Channel 1

  

Kota Tinggi-Kuala Plan: Plan 01

Sudetan2

  4 Legend WS Q 5 y rs

2 Ground

  ) m Bank Sta n ( o ti a

• 2

  lev E

• 4
• 6 50 100 150 200 250 300 Station (m)

  

Figure 7. Cross section of alternate channel 1

b. Alternate Channel 2

  Kota Tinggi bridge Ldg Tanjong Putus

  Sebadan Simpang Empat

  P. Kayu

  Figure 8. River schematization with alternate channel 2

  The length of alternate channel 2 is 1.4 km (Figure 8). The simulation result shows that this alternate channel does not significantly reduce water level (Figure 9). Bed channel width, top channel width and channel depth are 55 meters, 98 meters, and 8.7 meters respectively (Figure 10).

  Simpang Empat Kota Tinggi _{) 4 6 8} Kota Tinggi-Kuala Plan: Plan 01 _{KtTinggi2 WS Q 5 y rs Legend Ground E} m _{ion ( lev -2 at -6 -4 2 ROB LOB}

• 8 _{2000 4000 6000 8000 10000 12000 Main Channel Distance (m)}

  

Figure 9. Long profile from Kota Tinggi to Simpang Empat using Alternate

Channel 2

Kota Tinggi-Kuala Plan: Plan 01

UJU NG SUDETAN

  6 Legend WS Q 5 y rs

  4 )

  Ground m

2 Bank Sta

  n ( o ti a lev E

• 2
• 4 50 100 150 200 250 300 Station (m)

  

Figure 10. Cross section of alternate channel 2

c. Alternate Channel 3

  Kota Tinggi bridge Ldg Tanjong Putus

  Sebadan Simpang Empat

  P. Kayu

  Figure 11. River schematization with alternate channel 3 The length of alternate channel 3 is 1.4 km (Figure 4.12). Proposed alternate channel insignificantly reduce water level (Figure 4.13). Bed channel width, top channel width and channel depth are 45 meters, 80 meters, and 7.5 meters respectively (Figure 4.14).

  Simpang Empat Kota Tinggi _{) 8 4 6} Kota Tinggi-Kuala Plan: Plan 01 _{KtTg2b WS Q 5 y rs Legend Ground E lev -2 at ion (} m _{-4 -6 2 ROB LOB}

• 8 _{2000 4000 6000 8000 10000 12000 Main Channel Distance (m)}

  

Figure 12. Long profile from Kota Tinggi to Simpang Empat using Alternate

Channel 3

Kota Tinggi-Kuala Plan: Plan 01

  CH 10400

  5 Legend

  4 WS Q 5 y rs

  3 Ground ) m

  2 Bank Sta n ( io

  1 at lev E

• 1
• 2
• 3

  50 100 150 200 250 300

  Station (m)

  

Figure 13. Cross section of alternate channel 3

  From the simulation on several alternate channels, it is observed that the alternate channel has an impact in reducing the water level. Selection of location and the length of the alternate channel impacts on the extend of water level reduced. This is because the longer the length of straight channel (of alternate channel), reduces the friction, increases the velocity, and hence reduce water level.

   Simulation for high storm depth 3.3.

  During severe flood event, drainage capacity (main channel and river bank) not sufficient for flow. There are two important things found during the flood events, i.e. inadequate urban drainage and inability of drainage water to escape. Extreme condition (December 2006 and January 2007 Johor Baru flood events), Kota Tinggi Town was flooded. In the hydraulic sense, the town became wide flood plain area as illustrated in Figure 14.

  Town flooded River flood plain

  Main channel

  Figure 14. Cross section for severe flood

  The long profile of the river for the simulation using 100 years return period of flood for the reach between Kota Tinggi to Simpang Empat is presented in Figure 15. It is shown that surface water level exceeds the river bank.

  Kota Tinggi-Kuala Plan: Plan 01

  Town flooded

  CH 6400

  6 Legend

  4 WS Q 100 y rs

  2 )

  Ground m

  Bank Sta n ( o ti a

• 2

  River cross section

  lev E

• 4
• 6
• 8 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 Station (m)

  Figure 15. Cross section during flood

  Once the river is incapable to accommodate the flow, water inundates the area surrounding the river. The range of the land inundated by the flood is about few kilometers from the river. It is seen in Figure 15 that river main channel is much smaller than the town area flooded. During that severe flood event, simulation result shows that the elevation of water level is 5.70 meter, which is close to the real elevation of the water at January 2007 flood event, i.e. 5.45 meter.

4. CONCLUSION

  1. The hydraulic model analysis shows that the alternate channel has an impact in reducing the water level. Selection of location and the length of the alternate channel impacts on the extend of water level reduced.

  2. Drainage capacity at Kota Tinggi is only able to accommodate water at low return ±5-10 years return period) periods of floods (

  3. January 2007 flood event was caused by 100 years return period of flood.

  ±5.7 m, which is close to

  4. Simulation result shows that water level at Kota Tinggi is the real elevation of flood ±5.45 m