S FIS 0900439 Bibliography
DAFTAR PUSTAKA
Arikunto, S. (2010).ProsedurPenelitian: SuatuPendekatanPraktik. Jakarta:
RinekaCipta.
Arikunto, S. (2011). ProsedurPenelitian:
Jakarta: RinekaCipta.
SuatuPendekatanPraktik.
Arikunto, S. (2013). ProsedurPenelitian:
Jakarta: RinekaCipta.
SuatuPendekatanPraktik.
Arifin, Z. (2012). Penelitian Pendidikan Metode dan Paradigma Baru .
Bandung: PT remaja Rosdakarya
Asmara, Y. (2014). Pengaruh penerapan model pembangkit argumen
dengan metode investigasi sains terhadap peningkatan
kemampuan argumentasi siswa pada materi listrik dinamis.
Skripsi. Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia: tidak diterbitkan.
Departemen Pendidikan Nasional (2006). Kurikulum 2006 Mata Pelajaran
IPA SMP/MTs. Jakarta: depdiknas.
Driver et all. (2000). Establishing the Norms of Scientific Argumentation
in Classroom. Science Education, 85 (3), 287-312
Erduran, Sibel. (2007). Methodological Foundations in the Study of
Argumentation in Science Classrooms. STOA,3.
Erduran, S., & Jimenez-Aleixandre, M.P. (2008). Argumenation in Science
Education. Florida State University-USA: Spinger.
Erduran& Osborne. (2006). ‘Learning to teach argumentation: Research
and development in the science classroom’. International Journal
of Science Education
Furtaket al. (2008). A Framework for Analyzing Reasoning In Science
Classroom Discourse. Annual Meeting of the American
Educational Research Association.
Gardner, H. (1999).The dicipline mind: What all students should
understand. New York: Simon & Schuster Inc.
Grooms, Jonathon. (2011). Using Argument-Driven Inquiry to Enhance
Students' Argument Sophistication When Supporting a Stance in
73
Juwansyah Sasmita, 2014
Efektivitas Model Pembelajaran Pembangkit Argumen Menggunakan Metode Investigasi
Sains Untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Argumentasi Siswa Smp Pada Materi Cahaya
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu
74
the Context of Socioscientific Issues. Electronic Theses, Treatises
and Dissertations. Paper 3950. Florida University State
Hake, R. R. (1998). Interactive Engagement Methods In Introductory
Mechanics
Courses.
[online]
Tersedia
:
[3 Maret
http://www.physics.indiana.edu/~sdi/IEM-2b.pdf
2014]
Hillock, G. (2009). Teaching Argument Writing Grades 6-12. United
States : Heinemann
Huda,
FauziaNur.
(2014).
PengaruhPenerapan
Model
PembangkitArgumendenganMetodeInvestigasiSainsterhadapPeni
ngkatanKemampuanArgumentasiSiswapadaMateriFluidaStatis.
Skripsi. UniversitasPendidikan Indonesia.
Kelly, G. J., & Takao, A. (2002). Epistemic levels in argumen: An
analysis of university oceanography students’ use of evidence in
writing. Science Education, 86, 314-342.
KementrianPendidikandanKebudayaan (2013) Implementasikurikulum
2013.
Jakarta:
BadanPengembanganSumberDayaManusiaPendidikandanKebuda
yaandanPenjaminMutuPendidikanKementrianPendidikandanKeb
udayaan.
King, H. (2013) Argumentation as part of lab work. An ISE research brief
discussing Kind et al.’s, "Peer argumentation in the school
science
laboratory." [online]
Tersedia
:
http://www.relatingresearchtopractice.org/article/252. [ juli 2014]
Kuhn, Deanna. (2009). Teaching and Learning Science as Argument .
Wiley Online Library. 10(1002).
McNeill, K. L., Lizotte, D. J., & Krajcik, J. (2006). Supporting students’
construction of scientific explanations by fading scaffolds in
instructional materials. The Journal of the Learning Sciences,
15(2), 153-191.
Muslim.
(2013).
Penerapan
Model
PembangkitArgumenBerbasisInvestigasiSainsDalamPembelajara
nFisikaUntukMeningkatkanKemampuanArgumentasiSiswa SMA.
LaporanAkhirHibahPenelitianDalamRangkaImplementasi
Program DIA bermutu BACH III. UniversitasPendidikan
Indonesia: tidakditerbitkan.
Juwansyah Sasmita, 2014
Efektivitas Model Pembelajaran Pembangkit Argumen Menggunakan Metode Investigasi
Sains Untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Argumentasi Siswa Smp Pada Materi Cahaya
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu
75
Norris, S., Philips, L. & Osborne, J. (2007). Scientific inquiry: the place of
interpretation and argumenation. In J. Luft, R. Bell & J. GessNewsome (Eds.), Science as Inquiry in the Secondary Setting .
Arlington, VA: NSTA Press
Nuffield. (2012). Argumentation and practical work. [online] Tersedia:
www.nuffieldfoundation.org [juni 2014]
Osborne, J., Erduran, S., & Simon, S. (2004). Enhancing the quality of
argumenation in school science. Journal of Research in Science
Teaching, 41(10), 994-1020.
Osborne, J., Erduran, S., & Simon, S. (2001). Enhancing the quality of
argumenation in school science. Journal of Research in Science
Teaching, 82(301).
Osborne, J., Erduran, S., & Simon, S. (2004). Learning to teach
Argumentation: Research And development in the science
Classroom. Journal of Research in Science Teaching.
PeraturanPemerintahPendidikandanKebudayaan. (2013) 81-A. Jakarta:
Badan Pengembangan Sumber Daya Manusia Pendidikan dan
Kebudayaan dan Penjamin Mutu Pendidikan Kementrian
Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.
Prasodjo, B. (2006). Teori dan Aplikasi Fisika SMP kelas VII. Yogyakarta:
YudhistiraGhalia Indonesia.
Rex, Lesley et al. (2014). What are warrant. The argumentresearch
group.
[online]
Tersedia:
http://sitemaker.umich.edu/argument/[juli 2014]
Sampson, V., Gerbino, F. (2010). Two Instructional Models That Teachers
Can Use to Promote & Support Scientific Argumenation in the
Biology Classroom The American Biology Teacher, 72(7), 427–
431.
Sugiyono. (2011). Metodepenelitiankombinasi(mixed method). Bandung:
Alfabeta.
Trent, R. (2009). Fostering Students’ Argumenation Skills in Geoscience
Education. Journal of Geoscience Education . 57(4), 224-232
Venville, G. J and Dawson, V. M. (2010). The Impact of classroom
intervention on grade 10 students’ argumentation skills, informal
Juwansyah Sasmita, 2014
Efektivitas Model Pembelajaran Pembangkit Argumen Menggunakan Metode Investigasi
Sains Untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Argumentasi Siswa Smp Pada Materi Cahaya
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu
76
reasoning, and conceptual understanding of science. Journal of
research in science teaching , 47 (8), 952-957.
Zohar, A., &Nemet, F. (2002). Fostering students’ knowledge and
argumenationskills through dilemmas in human genetics. Journal
of Research in Science Teaching, 39 (1), 35-62.
Juwansyah Sasmita, 2014
Efektivitas Model Pembelajaran Pembangkit Argumen Menggunakan Metode Investigasi
Sains Untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Argumentasi Siswa Smp Pada Materi Cahaya
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu
Arikunto, S. (2010).ProsedurPenelitian: SuatuPendekatanPraktik. Jakarta:
RinekaCipta.
Arikunto, S. (2011). ProsedurPenelitian:
Jakarta: RinekaCipta.
SuatuPendekatanPraktik.
Arikunto, S. (2013). ProsedurPenelitian:
Jakarta: RinekaCipta.
SuatuPendekatanPraktik.
Arifin, Z. (2012). Penelitian Pendidikan Metode dan Paradigma Baru .
Bandung: PT remaja Rosdakarya
Asmara, Y. (2014). Pengaruh penerapan model pembangkit argumen
dengan metode investigasi sains terhadap peningkatan
kemampuan argumentasi siswa pada materi listrik dinamis.
Skripsi. Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia: tidak diterbitkan.
Departemen Pendidikan Nasional (2006). Kurikulum 2006 Mata Pelajaran
IPA SMP/MTs. Jakarta: depdiknas.
Driver et all. (2000). Establishing the Norms of Scientific Argumentation
in Classroom. Science Education, 85 (3), 287-312
Erduran, Sibel. (2007). Methodological Foundations in the Study of
Argumentation in Science Classrooms. STOA,3.
Erduran, S., & Jimenez-Aleixandre, M.P. (2008). Argumenation in Science
Education. Florida State University-USA: Spinger.
Erduran& Osborne. (2006). ‘Learning to teach argumentation: Research
and development in the science classroom’. International Journal
of Science Education
Furtaket al. (2008). A Framework for Analyzing Reasoning In Science
Classroom Discourse. Annual Meeting of the American
Educational Research Association.
Gardner, H. (1999).The dicipline mind: What all students should
understand. New York: Simon & Schuster Inc.
Grooms, Jonathon. (2011). Using Argument-Driven Inquiry to Enhance
Students' Argument Sophistication When Supporting a Stance in
73
Juwansyah Sasmita, 2014
Efektivitas Model Pembelajaran Pembangkit Argumen Menggunakan Metode Investigasi
Sains Untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Argumentasi Siswa Smp Pada Materi Cahaya
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu
74
the Context of Socioscientific Issues. Electronic Theses, Treatises
and Dissertations. Paper 3950. Florida University State
Hake, R. R. (1998). Interactive Engagement Methods In Introductory
Mechanics
Courses.
[online]
Tersedia
:
[3 Maret
http://www.physics.indiana.edu/~sdi/IEM-2b.pdf
2014]
Hillock, G. (2009). Teaching Argument Writing Grades 6-12. United
States : Heinemann
Huda,
FauziaNur.
(2014).
PengaruhPenerapan
Model
PembangkitArgumendenganMetodeInvestigasiSainsterhadapPeni
ngkatanKemampuanArgumentasiSiswapadaMateriFluidaStatis.
Skripsi. UniversitasPendidikan Indonesia.
Kelly, G. J., & Takao, A. (2002). Epistemic levels in argumen: An
analysis of university oceanography students’ use of evidence in
writing. Science Education, 86, 314-342.
KementrianPendidikandanKebudayaan (2013) Implementasikurikulum
2013.
Jakarta:
BadanPengembanganSumberDayaManusiaPendidikandanKebuda
yaandanPenjaminMutuPendidikanKementrianPendidikandanKeb
udayaan.
King, H. (2013) Argumentation as part of lab work. An ISE research brief
discussing Kind et al.’s, "Peer argumentation in the school
science
laboratory." [online]
Tersedia
:
http://www.relatingresearchtopractice.org/article/252. [ juli 2014]
Kuhn, Deanna. (2009). Teaching and Learning Science as Argument .
Wiley Online Library. 10(1002).
McNeill, K. L., Lizotte, D. J., & Krajcik, J. (2006). Supporting students’
construction of scientific explanations by fading scaffolds in
instructional materials. The Journal of the Learning Sciences,
15(2), 153-191.
Muslim.
(2013).
Penerapan
Model
PembangkitArgumenBerbasisInvestigasiSainsDalamPembelajara
nFisikaUntukMeningkatkanKemampuanArgumentasiSiswa SMA.
LaporanAkhirHibahPenelitianDalamRangkaImplementasi
Program DIA bermutu BACH III. UniversitasPendidikan
Indonesia: tidakditerbitkan.
Juwansyah Sasmita, 2014
Efektivitas Model Pembelajaran Pembangkit Argumen Menggunakan Metode Investigasi
Sains Untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Argumentasi Siswa Smp Pada Materi Cahaya
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu
75
Norris, S., Philips, L. & Osborne, J. (2007). Scientific inquiry: the place of
interpretation and argumenation. In J. Luft, R. Bell & J. GessNewsome (Eds.), Science as Inquiry in the Secondary Setting .
Arlington, VA: NSTA Press
Nuffield. (2012). Argumentation and practical work. [online] Tersedia:
www.nuffieldfoundation.org [juni 2014]
Osborne, J., Erduran, S., & Simon, S. (2004). Enhancing the quality of
argumenation in school science. Journal of Research in Science
Teaching, 41(10), 994-1020.
Osborne, J., Erduran, S., & Simon, S. (2001). Enhancing the quality of
argumenation in school science. Journal of Research in Science
Teaching, 82(301).
Osborne, J., Erduran, S., & Simon, S. (2004). Learning to teach
Argumentation: Research And development in the science
Classroom. Journal of Research in Science Teaching.
PeraturanPemerintahPendidikandanKebudayaan. (2013) 81-A. Jakarta:
Badan Pengembangan Sumber Daya Manusia Pendidikan dan
Kebudayaan dan Penjamin Mutu Pendidikan Kementrian
Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.
Prasodjo, B. (2006). Teori dan Aplikasi Fisika SMP kelas VII. Yogyakarta:
YudhistiraGhalia Indonesia.
Rex, Lesley et al. (2014). What are warrant. The argumentresearch
group.
[online]
Tersedia:
http://sitemaker.umich.edu/argument/[juli 2014]
Sampson, V., Gerbino, F. (2010). Two Instructional Models That Teachers
Can Use to Promote & Support Scientific Argumenation in the
Biology Classroom The American Biology Teacher, 72(7), 427–
431.
Sugiyono. (2011). Metodepenelitiankombinasi(mixed method). Bandung:
Alfabeta.
Trent, R. (2009). Fostering Students’ Argumenation Skills in Geoscience
Education. Journal of Geoscience Education . 57(4), 224-232
Venville, G. J and Dawson, V. M. (2010). The Impact of classroom
intervention on grade 10 students’ argumentation skills, informal
Juwansyah Sasmita, 2014
Efektivitas Model Pembelajaran Pembangkit Argumen Menggunakan Metode Investigasi
Sains Untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Argumentasi Siswa Smp Pada Materi Cahaya
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu
76
reasoning, and conceptual understanding of science. Journal of
research in science teaching , 47 (8), 952-957.
Zohar, A., &Nemet, F. (2002). Fostering students’ knowledge and
argumenationskills through dilemmas in human genetics. Journal
of Research in Science Teaching, 39 (1), 35-62.
Juwansyah Sasmita, 2014
Efektivitas Model Pembelajaran Pembangkit Argumen Menggunakan Metode Investigasi
Sains Untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Argumentasi Siswa Smp Pada Materi Cahaya
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu