Manajemen | Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Maritim Raja Ali Haji joeb.84.3.142-150
Journal of Education for Business
ISSN: 0883-2323 (Print) 1940-3356 (Online) Journal homepage: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/vjeb20
Leveraging Alumni and Business Community
Relations to Assess the Information Systems
Curriculum
Robert K. Plice & Bruce A. Reinig
To cite this article: Robert K. Plice & Bruce A. Reinig (2009) Leveraging Alumni and Business
Community Relations to Assess the Information Systems Curriculum, Journal of Education for
Business, 84:3, 142-150, DOI: 10.3200/JOEB.84.3.142-150
To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.3200/JOEB.84.3.142-150
Published online: 07 Aug 2010.
Submit your article to this journal
Article views: 25
View related articles
Citing articles: 5 View citing articles
Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at
http://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=vjeb20
Download by: [Universitas Maritim Raja Ali Haji]
Date: 11 January 2016, At: 22:49
Downloaded by [Universitas Maritim Raja Ali Haji] at 22:49 11 January 2016
LeveragingAlumniandBusiness
CommunityRelationstoAssess
theInformationSystemsCurriculum
ROBERTK.PLICE
BRUCEA.REINIG
SANDIEGOSTATEUNIVERSITY
SANDIEGO,CALIFORNIA
ABSTRACT.ArecentAssociationto
AdvanceCollegiateSchoolsofBusiness
(2006)taskforcecalledforincreasedinteractionbetweenbusinessschoolsandthebusinesscommunitytoidentifyessentialskillsets
andhelpwiththecurriculum-management
process.Aninformationsystemscurriculumassessmentstudysolicitedinputfromrecent
alumniworkinginthebusinesscommunity
whohaddemonstratedasolidgraspofthe
curriculum.Ananalysisoftheresponses
indicatesthatcommunicationsandteamwork
skillsareperceivedashighlyimportanttothe
businesscommunity.Qualitativeandstatisticalanalysesshowthatthebusinesscommunityperceivesvalueincurriculumcontent
thatemphasizesmanagerialandsystems
developmenttopicsandcoverstechnicaltopicsbroadlyratherthandeeply.
Keywords:alumni,businesscommunity,
curriculumassessment,informationsystems
Copyright©2008HeldrefPublications
142
JournalofEducationforBusiness
T
he following quotation is from a
recent report by the Alliance for
Management Education (AME; 2006)
task force, comprising business communityrepresentatives,businessschool
deans,andAssociationtoAdvanceCollegiate Schools of Business (AACSB;
2006)administrators:
Management education must develop
mechanismsforunderstandingtheessential competencies and skill sets of business school graduates, forecasting how
those competencies will change in the
future,andassessingthelevelofmastery
ofthoseskillsandcompetencies.(p.9)
Thereportexpressesfrustrationover
thelackofstrategicinteractionbetween
businessschoolsandthebusinesscommunity. Further,AACSB’s (2006) strategic management standards explicitly
called for involvement of key stakeholders in the curriculum-management
process and identified alumni and the
business community among this group
(e.g.,facultyandadministrators).
Information systems (IS) programs,
perhaps more so than other disciplines
in business schools, immediately benefit from such interaction. IS faculty
face a considerable challenge in maintaining a current, value-added curriculum that prepares students to succeed
intoday’sglobalbusinessenvironment.
In addressing this challenge, they are
constrainedandmotivatedbythereality
thatISandothercomputer-relatedpro-
grams at universities worldwide have
experienced marked drops in enrollments since the collapse of the 1990s
dot-com bubble. For this trend to be
reversed, faculty and program administrators must learn how to incorporate
new technologies, evolving standards,
and applicable regulatory conditions
effectively into their programs, so that
current and potential students perceive
alignment between what they (a) learn
intheISprogramand(b)needtobegin
andsustainacareer.Involvementofthe
business community is crucial for providingguidanceontheseissues.
In the present article, we discuss an
approach to IS curriculum assessment
thatevaluatesperceptionsofalumniinan
IS program at a large, public university
in the western United States currently
workinginthebusinesscommunity.People at the intersection of these two key
stakeholderpopulations(i.e.,alumniand
businesses) may offer rich insights into
curriculum issues because they possess
frontline knowledge of business needs
and an in-depth understanding of the
IScurriculum.Otherstakeholders—such
as recruiters, business executives, and
university administrators—are likely to
possess extensive knowledge of businessneedsortheIScurriculumbutnot
both.Moreover,whenopen-endedquestionsareaskedaboutcurriculumissues,
there is a risk of response misinterpretation unless the terminology used is
Downloaded by [Universitas Maritim Raja Ali Haji] at 22:49 11 January 2016
commonlyunderstoodbytheresearchers
and respondents. For example, such IS
curriculum-relatedconstructsassystems
analysis and project management can
have significantly different meanings to
engineers, computer scientists, and IS
graduates.EvenifISgraduatesfromseveraldifferentinstitutionsarequestioned,
their responses may include terms that
areusedinsubtlydifferentways,orthey
mayrefertocoursesthattheytookabout
which limited information is available.
In the present study, we avoided these
threats to validity by analyzing the perceptions of business- community memberswhosharewith theresearchersthe
exact vocabulary regarding the content
ofIScourses.
We begin this presentation with a
discussion of the current outlook for
IS programs and the research questions that our investigation addressed.
Then, we describe the participating IS
department’s alumni advisory board
and the approach we used to solicit its
knowledge and insight regarding what
isneededintheindustryandthevalue
of the IS curriculum in meeting those
needs.Last,wepresenttheresultsofthe
assessment and specific recommendationsandactionsthathaveresultedfrom
theevaluationprocess.
WhyCurriculumAssessmentIs
UrgentlyNeededforISPrograms
TherapidbuildupofInternet-related
companies in the late 1990s resulted
in a well-discussed hiring binge, with
muchoftheactivityfundedbyventure
capital and the proceeds from initial
publicofferings.Asanaftereffectofthe
consequentcorrection,businessschools
in the United States have seen sharp
drops in enrollment in IS degree programs. The IS department that served
as the setting for this research is typical among universities that have large
undergraduate IS programs. The numberofundergraduatesdeclaringamajor
in IS in 2006 was approximately 25%
ofthenumberin2000.Therehavebeen
similar reports from other universities,
andthephenomenonhasalsobeenseen
in majors related to such complementary disciplines as computer science
andelectricalengineering(Foster,2005;
George,Valacich,&Valor,2005).Many
universitieshavecutbackonISfaculty
becausetherehavebeentoofewstudents
tofilltheavailableseats(Frolick,Chen,
&Janz,2005).Anotherreasonstudents
maynowshuncomputer-relatedcareers
is the widespread publicity regarding
off-shoring of IT jobs. This could lead
students to consider IS careers risky
overthelong-term.
There is not likely to be a return to
the dot-com-driven enrollment trends
in IS in which graduates commonly
received multiple offers and enjoyed
starting salaries among the highest of
anybusinessmajor(NationalAssociationofCollegesandEmployers,2000).
However,theBureauofLaborStatistics
(2000)andtheFederalReserveBoard
(2005) have forecast that demand for
ISworkerswillbestrong;shortagesof
qualifiedapplicantshavebeenreported
in some parts of the United States. If
the enrollment trends in IS programs
arenotreversed,itmaybedifficultfor
futureemployerstofindadequatenumbers of qualified workers. The present research questions were designed
to capture the elements necessary to
evaluate whether the IS curriculum is
meetingoneofitsmostimportantpurposes: to prepare graduates for successful,sustainablecareersindevising
information strategies and guiding the
efforts of organizations to build and
implement systems that support those
strategies.
ResearchQuestions
The first research question aims to
give a sense of the skills that are perceivedtobemostimportantforgraduatesinachievingcareersuccess.
ResearchQuestion1(RQ1):Whatare
themostimportantskillsthatshouldbe
taughttoISmajors?
Thesecondresearchquestionassesses the value of helping students to
achieve certain industry certifications
(e.g.,CompTIA’sA+,MicrosoftCertified Systems Engineer, Cisco Certified Network Analyst). These certifications are sometimes mentioned in
job-opportunity postings, and students
often inquire about their worth. In the
ISdepartmentusedforthisstudy,there
hasbeendiscussionof(a)theoptionof
including course material specifically
intended to enable students to sit for
theassociatedexaminationsand(b)the
possibilityofrequiringstudentstopass
oneormorecertificationexamspriorto
graduation.
RQ2: Should the IS program require
students to achieve specific industry
certifications?
The third and fourth research questions relate to the practical challenges
of implementing the results of a curriculumassessmentatthecourselevel:
It is one thing to gather input from
constituenciesbutanothertoapplythat
knowledgewithrespecttocoursedevelopment,offerings,andrequirements.To
supportthiseffort,wesoughtanunderstandingabouthoweachcourseoffered
aspartoftheISprogramprovidesvalue
to the business constituency. Specifically, perceptions were sought about
whether the course should be required
orelectiveandwhattheperceivedvalue
addedmaybe.
RQ3: Which courses should be
required,andwhichshouldbeelective?
RQ4:Whatistherelativevalueadded
to the business community of each
course?
ToexploreRQ1andRQ2,theperceptions of recruiters or possibly membersofindustryassociationssuchasthe
Association for Computing Machinery
ortheAssiociationofInformationTechnology Professionals could reasonably
besought.However,perceptionsrelative
to RQ3 are only valuable if they come
from someone with firsthand experienceofthecoursesavailablefromtheIS
departmentwheretheresearchwasconducted (i.e., faculty, current students,
alumni).Ofthese,onlyalumniworking
in the business community also have
valid perceptions relevant to RQ1 and
RQ2. Thus, they represent a uniquely
valuable source of information: They
have the knowledge to address all four
oftheresearchquestions.
AlumniAdvisoryBoard
Becauseoftheobjectiveofexploring
theperceptionsofanalumnigroupthat
hasthebestpossiblegraspofthecurrent
curriculum, the assessment initiative
focusedonalumniwhohadestablished
themselvesduringtheirstudentyearsas
havingmasteredthecurriculuminplace
January/February2009
143
Downloaded by [Universitas Maritim Raja Ali Haji] at 22:49 11 January 2016
atthetime.Also,inquirieswerelimited
toalumniwhoreceivedtheirdegreesin
the last 10 years, when the curriculum
was comparable in its IS content and
emphasistotheonetoday.
Thedepartmentservingastheresearch
setting actively maintains an alumni
advisory board, with a membership
thatincludesgraduatesfromthepast10
yearswhohaveundergonepriorvetting
by the faculty about their suitability for
inclusion on the panel (Penrose, 2002).
Thedepartmentestablishedandusesthe
board to provide advice on curriculum
issues and business needs, support the
department by providing information
about career trends, and bring in board
membersasguestlecturers.
METHOD
A survey was developed to address
our research questions, and it was
administered to the alumni advisory
board.Inadditiontodemographicquestions, the survey included open-ended
questions designed to capture the skill
set required of graduates. Addressing
RQ1, the survey asked, “What are the
most important skills that should be
taughttoISmajorsattheuniversity?”
To evaluate perceptions relative to
RQ2, the survey asked, “Should the IS
majorattheuniversityrequirestudents
to achieve specific industry certifications?”and“Ifso,whatspecificcertificationsshouldberequired?”Toaddress
perceptions relative to RQ3 and RQ4,
the survey presented the respondents
withalistofcoursesthatarepresently
included in the undergraduate IS program and a brief description of each
course,whichwastakenverbatimfrom
thelatest(2005–2006)officialuniversitycatalog.1Foreachcourse,thesurvey
asked respondents to (a) recommend
whetherthecourseshouldbearequired
oranelectivecomponentoftheISprogramand(b)rateitsvaluetothemselves
andtheircareerona5-pointLikert-type
scale ranging from 1 (low value) to 5
(highvalue).
The survey was mailed to all members of the alumni advisory board in
May 2005 and was followed by an email reminder a few weeks later. Of
the 182 surveys initially sent out, 25
werereturnedashavinginvalidmailing
144
JournalofEducationforBusiness
addresses, resulting in a base of 157
possible responses. In all, 81 surveys
werereturnedovera3-monthperiodfor
a response rate of 51.6%. The respondentsindicatedameanageof32.9years
(SD=8.1years)andmeanworkexperience of 9.7 years (SD = 8.6 years). In
terms of gender, 50 (61.7%) indicated
male, 28 (34.6%) indicated female,
and3(3.7%)didnotrespond.Interms
of organization size, 11 (14.9%) had
fewer than 25 employees, 9 (12.2%)
had26–100employees,13(17.6%)had
101–500 employees, and 41 (55.4%)
hadmorethan500employees.Interms
oflocation,54(66.7%)wereintheuniversity’s local area, 10 were in adjoiningregionsofthestate(12.3%),andthe
remaining17(20.1%)wereelsewhere.
AnalysisofRQ1:ISSkillSet
A content analysis was conducted
ontheopen-endedquestion,“Whatare
themostimportantskillsthatshouldbe
taughttoISmajors?”Thisquestionelicitedawiderangeofresponses(seethe
Appendix). The results are categorized
underthreemajorthemes:communication and teamwork skills, managerial
and systems development skills, and
technicalskills,allofwhichreceiveda
largenumberofmentions.Eachtheme
was divided into subheadings that are
further divided into the actual commentsmentionedbytherespondents.
CommunicationsandTeamworkSkills
The first theme emerging from the
open-endedquestionwascommunication
and teamwork skills. Written communication, general communication, teamwork,andoralcommunicationskillsall
received frequent mention by the experienced alumni. Communication-related
skills (written, oral) were identified far
morefrequentlybytherespondentsthan
anyotherarea,evenmorethancoretopicssuchassystemsdevelopment,project
management,anddatabases.Theclarity
with which this theme emerged is evidence of the perceived career value of
goodcommunicationsskills.TheparticipatingISdepartment’sdiscussionabout
curriculum choices has been influenced
bythisfinding:Ratherthanfocusingits
attention on the relative emphasis that
thecurriculumgivestotechnicalthemes
versusbusinessthemes(atraditionaldiscussion in an IS faculty), the departmenthasbeenmotivatedtolookatways
of introducing more communication
skill-building exercises throughout the
curriculum.
ManagerialandSystemsDevelopment
Skills
The second theme emerging from
the content analysis of the open-ended
question is that of managerial- and
systems-development skills. General
project management, general managerial and systems-development skills
(includingsystemsanalysisanddesign)
were all frequently suggested by the
respondents. In particular, project-
management skills were recognized as
highly important. Thus, it would seem
that there is considerable perceived
value in the group projects commonly
assigned to students pursuing a major
inISthatgiveclassroomexperiencein
project-managementissues.
TechnicalSkills
Thethirdthemethatemergedfromthe
contentanalysisistechnicalskills.Generalprogramming,databaseanddesign,
andnetwork-computingskillsweremost
frequently perceived as important. It is
interestingthatfewspecifictechnologies
emergedfromtheresponses.Rather,the
responsessuggestthatexperiencedgraduates perceive general knowledge of a
broadrangeoftechnologiestobemore
important than in-depth specialization.
Forexample,therewaslittlementionof
teaching Oracle or Access, but general
database skills were frequently mentioned. In addition, more than twice as
manyrespondentsrecommendedgeneral
programmingskillsthanallofthementionsreceivedforspecificprogramming
languagescombined.Thiscanbeinterpretedtomeanthatrespondentsperceive
a general knowledge of programming
concepts and database systems to be
importantfortheircareers,evenasthey
moveintomanagerialroles.
Another implication of the study
is that communication and teamwork
skills occur prominently in the perceptions of experienced graduates
of the IS program. This finding suggests ways in which the faculty can
of2.4certifications(SD=1.9).However,
therewasnoclearconsensusonwhichis
mostvaluable.Generalsystems-oriented
certifications from Microsoft received
themostfrequentmention.Networking
certifications were also widely mentioned, especially those of Cisco. Project management and security-oriented
certifications received relatively infrequentmention.Thevastmajorityofthe
mentionedcertificationsfocusprimarily
ontechnicalskillsratherthanbusiness-
orientedtopics.
The certification question also capturedsomeunpromptedresponsesfrom
the alumni, including comments from
those who felt strongly in favor or
against requiring certifications. Some
recent reports hold that the value of
certifications may be overestimated,
with one survey suggesting that noncertified workers have received larger
annual pay increases than certified
workers (Pratt, 2005). According to
Pratt’sreport,thismaybebecausecertification exams have become watered
down and their value diluted as the
number of third-party teaching centers
AnalysisofRQ2:Certifications
Figure1providesdescriptivestatistics
relative to the certifications question:
“Should the IS major require students
to achieve specific industry certifications?”Amongthe31respondentswho
answeredyes(38.3%),6didnotrecommendanyspecificcertifications,andthe
remaining25recommendedanaverage
Shouldtheinformationsystems 25
majorrequirestudentstoachieve
specificindustrycertifications?
20
Linux+
SCDJWS
MCSA
No
response 15
12.3%
MCP
CCDP
CCNP
Network+
10
MCDBA
aly
sis
UML
An
ion
cat
pli
uri
ty
s
CCSP
Security+
CISSP SAP
OCP
ase
tab
ent
Da
gem
ner
rks
two
Ne
ste
ms
0
al
PMP
Ap
CAPM
A+
Sec
CCNA
Ma
na
Yes
38.3%
MCSE
5
Ge
No
49.4%
Sy
Downloaded by [Universitas Maritim Raja Ali Haji] at 22:49 11 January 2016
beproactiveaboutimprovingteaching
methodstobetterpreparestudentsfor
the workplace. A renewed emphasis
on group projects, presentations, and
writtencommunicationskillsthroughout the curriculum—in addition to
continuingtorequirestudentstocomplete a formal course of instruction
in business communications—may be
the most important set of actions that
can be taken to help graduates obtain
jobs and advance in their careers. It
is not enough to train students in the
managerial and technological aspects
of the IS field: Programs must also
produce graduates who can articulate
theirknowledge.
FIGURE1.Relativefrequencyforrequiringcertificationsandrecommendedcertificationsforthoseanswering“yes.”CAPM=certified
associateinprojectmanagement;CCDP=Ciscocertifieddesignprofessional;CCNA=Ciscocertifiednetworkassociate;CCNP=Ciscocertified
networkprofessional;CCSP=Ciscocertifiedsecurityprofessional;CISSP
=certifiedinformationsystemssecurityprofessional;MCDBA=Microsoft
certifieddatabaseadministrator;MCP=Microsoftcertifiedprofessional;
MCSA=Microsoftcertifiedsystemsadministrator;MCSE=Microsoftcertifiedsystemsengineer;OCP=Oraclecertifiedprofessional;PMP=project
managementprofessional;SAP=systems,applications,andproducts;
SCDJWS=suncertifieddeveloperforJavaWebservices;UML=unified
modelinglanguage.
has grown. Nevertheless, certifications
are still reported to be good differentiatorsforentry-levelcandidates.Those
who favored certifications (38.3%)
often cited (a) the advantage that they
would provide graduates entering the
workforce and (b) the opportunity for
advancement after entering the workforce. Comments supporting this positionincludedthefollowing:“Technical
certification will help graduates compete with computer science majors for
jobs. Businesses do not seem to favor
thebusinessorientationofthe[IS]program, all things being equal”; “If the
student wants to work with systems
on a technical level, then they should
also consider looking into a technical certificate. Lots of people start out
withtechnicalpositionsandmoveinto
managerialpositionfromtherebecause
they technically understand the system”; and “To avoid entry-level work,
best to get certified so that graduates
can get hired with better skill set and
advancemorequickly.”
Those recommending against requiring certifications (49.4%) also included
some unsolicited comments explaining
their opposition. This group of respondents seemed to associate certifications
with technical schools or computer scienceschoolsratherthan4-yearbusiness
degrees. Others viewed certification as
something that would be useful after a
graduatehaschosenacareerpath.Comments supporting this position included
the following: “No! Don’t do that.You
aren’ta[communitycollege]orvocationalschool—teachISfolkshowtothink”;
“I think IT needs to remain a business
degreenotcomputerscience”;and“This
comes later. Too much pressure—and
maykeepyounarrowlyfocused.”
A prominent third view of certifications was that they should be optional.
Therespondentswiththatviewtendedto
answernoorneithertothecertification
question,andtheyexpressedmixedattitudestowardcertificationsandtheirrole
intheISprogram.Commentsrepresentativeofthisviewincludedthefollowing:
“I feel that the certifications should be
offered as an option or elective. They
are sometimes required for a position,
but many employers will pay for the
training. It can give an advantage if
student already has the certification”;
January/February2009
145
Downloaded by [Universitas Maritim Raja Ali Haji] at 22:49 11 January 2016
“This should be an individual choice,
perhapsanelectivecourse”;and“Ithink
[theuniversity]shouldpresenttheoptions
butnotrequirethem.Itdependsonif[the
university]wantstocompetewithITT....
Getting certified in CISCO networks is
morelikeatradeinmyopinion.”
Thus,perceptionsrelatedtotheissue
of certifications appear to be contentious and represent a tradeoff between
two categories of skills that emerged
fromRQ1:(a)managerialandsystemsdevelopment skills and (b) technical
skills. The responses should be interpretedcautiously,butthereisanadvantageinknowingthattherespondentsas
a group were thinking about the certification question within the framework
of the present curriculum structure. If
the curriculum was to be modified to
emphasize the technical skills needed
forcertificationexams,therewouldbea
costintermsofreducingthemanagerial
andsystems-developmentcontentofthe
courses.Iftheknowledgeneededtosit
for the exams could be acquired without cost, there would be every reason
to do so. The advantage of surveying
individuals with knowledge of the curriculum and the needs of the business
constituency is that they are able to
evaluate the costs and benefits. It can
be concluded from this question that
there is a widespread perception that
certifications can be useful for helping
new graduates gain entry to the workforce, but that the managerial and systems-development skills in the current
curriculumarevaluableforsustaininga
careerovertime.
AnalysisofRQ3:Course
Requirements
ToanalyzeRQ3,thesurveypresented
the respondents with a list of courses
that are presently included in the participating university’s undergraduate
IS program and a brief description of
each course; it asked respondents to
recommend whether the course should
be a required or elective component
of the IS program. Figure 2 summarizestheresponses.AWilcoxon-Mann-
Whitney test (Siegel & Castellan,
1988) was conducted to determine if
thealumniresponseswerealignedwith
thecurrentdesignationsofrequiredand
146
JournalofEducationforBusiness
Electivecourses
Requiredcourses
ISanalysis
Reportingtechniquesforbusinessprofessionals
ISdesign
IStechnology
Datamanagementsystems
Businessapplicationprogramming
ManagementofIS
Projectmanagement
Networkinganddatacommunications
Statitisticalanalysisforbusiness
Informationtechnologyprojects
E-businessandwebdevelopment
Advancedprogrammingforbusiness
Javaprogrammingforbusinessapplications
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
PercentageofRespondents
100%
FIGURE2.Relativefrequencyofrespondentsrecommendingcurrent
informationsystems(IS)majorcoursesasrequiredcurriculum.
elective courses. TheWilcoxon-MannWhitney test was chosen because it
only requires data in ordinal format
(Siegel&Castellan).Otherapproaches,
suchasaggregatingthesevenrequired
courses and comparing them with the
aggregation of the elective courses,
would be overly sensitive to outliers,
and,inthiscase,wouldundulyreduce
theratingsoftheelectivecourses(e.g.,
Javaprogrammingforbusinessapplications; see Figure 2) and be less informative of the overall mix of courses.
Therequiredcourseswereratedsignificantly higher—in terms of their rank
order with regard to recommendations
for required curriculum—than were
the elective courses (Wilcoxon-MannWhitney = 33, p = .015). Overall, the
existing designations of required and
electivecoursesseemtobewellaligned
with the perceptions of the business
community.
In Figure 2, the three courses with
the highest percentages of respondents
recommending the course as required
curriculum are shown to be systems
analysis (95.8%), reporting techniques
(90.3%), and systems design (90.1%).
The reporting-techniques course is a
purelycommunications-orientedpartof
thecurriculum,anditsprominentposi-
tioninthefigurereinforcesthefinding
from RQ1 that experienced graduates
perceiveaneedforstronginterpersonal
andcommunicationsskills.Theanalysis
and design courses deal primarily with
analysis of business IS requirements
andmappingtechnicalsolutionstobusiness problems. Thus, they align more
with the managerial and system-developmentskillscategoryintheAppendix
thanwiththetechnicalskillscategory.
Thethreecourseswiththelowestpercentagesofrespondentsrecommending
the course as required curriculum fall
intothetechnicalskillscategoryinthe
Appendix: Web development (43.1%),
advanced programming (29.2%), and
Java programming (16.7%). On the
whole,Figure2supportstheideasthat
experienced graduates tend to favor
emphasizing managerial and systemsdevelopmenttopicsovertechnicalmaterial and that communications skills are
perceivedasimportant.
TwocoursesstandoutinFigure2as
beingoutofalignmentwiththerespondents’ perceptions of what should be
requiredinthecurriculum.IStechnology is presently an elective course,
and networking and data communications are required. However, the share
of respondents who perceived that IS
Downloaded by [Universitas Maritim Raja Ali Haji] at 22:49 11 January 2016
technology should be required was
greater than that of those who perceived that networking and data communicationsshouldberequired.Interpretingthisresultwouldbeespecially
difficult if the sampling frame were
the general population of the business
constituency. However, because the
respondents were each familiar with
the actual content of the courses as
they are currently offered, this can be
recognized as entirely consistent with
the perception that technical material
shouldbecoveredbroadly,ratherthan
deeply,asnotedintheanalysisofRQ1.
IS technology covers a broad array
of computer and communications topics,withanemphasisondevelopinga
vocabularyandbackgroundthatenables
students to evaluate the significance
of future developments in technology.
Networkinganddatacommunications,
however,delvedeeplyintoaparticular
facetoftechnology:networking.
AnalysisofRQ4:ValueAddedof
CourseContent
ToanalyzeRQ4,therespondentswere
presentedwithalistofcoursesthatare
presently included in the undergraduate IS program, and the respondents
wereaskedtoratethevalueofeachto
themselvesandtheircareerona5-point
Likert-type scale ranging from 1 (low
value)to5(highvalue).Theresultsare
summarized in Figure 3. The required
courseswereratedsignificantlyhigher,
intermsoftheirrankorderwithregard
to career value, than were the elective
courses (Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney =
34,p=.022).Thus,thedesignationsof
requiredandelectivecoursesseemtobe
wellalignedwiththevalueperceptions
ofthebusinesscommunity.
Again, it can be seen that the communications course and the system
analysis and design courses have the
highest mean value ratings and that
the programming and Web-development courses have mean value ratingsamongthelowest.Ingeneral,this
comports with the findings from RQ3
that experienced graduates perceive
managerial and systems-development
coursecontenttobeespeciallyimportant to them. Two courses, Management of IS and Business Application
Electivecourses
Requiredcourses
Reportingtechniquesforbusinessprofessionals
ISanalysis
ISdesign
Datamanagementsystems
Businessapplicationprogramming
Projectmanagement
IStechnology
Informationtechnologyprojects
Networkinganddatacommunications
ManagementofIS
E-businessandwebdevelopment
Advancedprogrammingforbusiness
Javaprogrammingforbusinessapplications
Statitisticalanalysisforbusiness
1
2
3
4
5
FIGURE3.Meanvalueassignedtoinformationsystems(IS)majorcoursesaccordingtoalumni.Alumniwereaskedtoevaluatethe“valueofthe
coursetoyouandyourcareer”ona5-pointLikert-typescaleranging
from1(lowvalue)to5(highvalue).
Programming, appear to be out of
placeintherankingsunderthisinterpretation.ManagementofISisnominally a management-oriented course,
but it is ranked toward the bottom
of the list, whereas Business Application Programming is a technically
oriented course that is ranked in the
top half. Again, there is less dissonance in this result than is suggested
by the names and simple descriptions
of the courses. For respondents who
haveknowledgeofthecoursesasthey
have actually been taught and delivered, Management of IS is viewed
as mostly containing technical contentdealingwithadministrationissues
related to IT infrastructure. Business
Application Programming, however,
is a course that emphasizes general
programming concepts and how they
applytobusinesssystems,andituses
a particular programming language to
illustrate those issues. In general, the
resultssummarizedinFigure3support
the same themes that emerged from
theanalysisoftheRQ1,RQ2,RQ3:(a)
Communications skills are perceived
to be important, (b) it is more important to give students a broad understanding of technology concepts than
todelvedeeplyintoparticulartechnol-
ogies, and (c) it is perceived that the
systems-development content of the
curriculum has a great deal of value
toexperiencedgraduatesinsustaining
theircareers.
Conclusion
TheIScomponentofbusinessschool
educationisfacinguniquecircumstances, and the need for alignment among
the objectives of the business constituency and the content of the curriculum has been articulated by many. In
the present research, we sought insight
from alumni in the business community to assess the program and courses
offeredbytheISdepartmentthatserved
astheresearchsetting.Theresultspresented in this article provide guidance
toward achieving alignment between
theIScurriculumandneedsofthebusinesscommunity.
Themainconclusionsfromtheanalysisarethefollowing:(a)TheISprogram
should have opportunities built in for
the development of interpersonal communications skills; (b) a broad range
of technical topics should be covered
in the curriculum, rather than a focus
on in-depth coverage of a few specific
hardware or software environments or
January/February2009
147
Downloaded by [Universitas Maritim Raja Ali Haji] at 22:49 11 January 2016
programminglanguages;and(c)acore
competency in systems development,
project management, and business and
managerialskillsshouldbeacquiredby
studentsintheISprogram.
IfanISfacultysucceedsinachieving
these objectives, the resulting curriculumwillbedistinctfromwhatistaught
inrelateddisciplines,suchascomputer
science.Studentswhoaremainlyinterested in specializing in one or more
specific areas of technology may be
better served by a computer science
or engineering degree. The responses
to the survey questions are persuasive:
Business constituency needs graduates
whocanhelpthemtoimplementstrategicITinitiativesintheirorganizations.
There are a number of limitations
and boundaries that may reduce the
degree to which these findings can be
generalized. The scope of the research
wasaspecificcurriculumforgraduates
workingpredominantlyinoneregionin
the western United States. The results
may differ for graduates of other universities with their own unique curricula or even for similar students and
curriculainotherregionsofthecountry
withdifferenteconomiesandindustries.
Eveninthecontextoftheparticipating
university’s program and its regional
economy, the IS field is continually
changing. Thus, the views of experiencedgraduatesmaychangeovertime,
and the research presented here should
be repeated periodically as part of an
ongoingassessmentprocess.
The responses to the curriculumassessment portion of the survey (i.e.,
rating the value of each course and
whether the course should be required
or elective in the curriculum) has at
least two limitations. First, the value
construct was measured with a single
item to keep the length of the survey
manageable,eventhoughitwouldhave
been preferable to capture this rating
usingmultipleitems.Second,responses
148
JournalofEducationforBusiness
to these items may be influenced by
whichinstructortaughtthecoursewhen
therespondentwasinschooland,inthe
case of elective courses, whether the
respondenthadtakenthecourse.
BecauseISdepartmentshaverecently
beenchallengedbydecliningenrollments,
they need a framework for evaluating
their curricula and making adjustments
that improve alignment with the needs
of their stakeholders. Ongoing assessment through interaction with the businesscommunitycanhelptoensurethat
the needs of the stakeholders are being
metbydeterminingifthoseneedshave
changed or are no longer being met
by the curriculum. Graduates from the
preceding10-yearperiodareinaunique
position to inform this process because
they are knowledgeable of the curriculum and the requirements of industry.
By drawing on their knowledge of the
kindsofworkresponsibilitiesthegraduates are likely to confront over time,
skills can be identified that help sustain successful careers.Also, a courseby-course evaluation of the curriculum
helps to avoid unwarranted assumptionsaboutthevalueofthatcurriculum.
Although the importance of the findings may vary from one university to
the next, depending on its unique local
situation,universitiesareencouragedto
use these results for guidance and to
adaptandimprovethemethodologypreviously described as they conduct their
individualassessments.
NOTES
1. Co
ISSN: 0883-2323 (Print) 1940-3356 (Online) Journal homepage: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/vjeb20
Leveraging Alumni and Business Community
Relations to Assess the Information Systems
Curriculum
Robert K. Plice & Bruce A. Reinig
To cite this article: Robert K. Plice & Bruce A. Reinig (2009) Leveraging Alumni and Business
Community Relations to Assess the Information Systems Curriculum, Journal of Education for
Business, 84:3, 142-150, DOI: 10.3200/JOEB.84.3.142-150
To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.3200/JOEB.84.3.142-150
Published online: 07 Aug 2010.
Submit your article to this journal
Article views: 25
View related articles
Citing articles: 5 View citing articles
Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at
http://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=vjeb20
Download by: [Universitas Maritim Raja Ali Haji]
Date: 11 January 2016, At: 22:49
Downloaded by [Universitas Maritim Raja Ali Haji] at 22:49 11 January 2016
LeveragingAlumniandBusiness
CommunityRelationstoAssess
theInformationSystemsCurriculum
ROBERTK.PLICE
BRUCEA.REINIG
SANDIEGOSTATEUNIVERSITY
SANDIEGO,CALIFORNIA
ABSTRACT.ArecentAssociationto
AdvanceCollegiateSchoolsofBusiness
(2006)taskforcecalledforincreasedinteractionbetweenbusinessschoolsandthebusinesscommunitytoidentifyessentialskillsets
andhelpwiththecurriculum-management
process.Aninformationsystemscurriculumassessmentstudysolicitedinputfromrecent
alumniworkinginthebusinesscommunity
whohaddemonstratedasolidgraspofthe
curriculum.Ananalysisoftheresponses
indicatesthatcommunicationsandteamwork
skillsareperceivedashighlyimportanttothe
businesscommunity.Qualitativeandstatisticalanalysesshowthatthebusinesscommunityperceivesvalueincurriculumcontent
thatemphasizesmanagerialandsystems
developmenttopicsandcoverstechnicaltopicsbroadlyratherthandeeply.
Keywords:alumni,businesscommunity,
curriculumassessment,informationsystems
Copyright©2008HeldrefPublications
142
JournalofEducationforBusiness
T
he following quotation is from a
recent report by the Alliance for
Management Education (AME; 2006)
task force, comprising business communityrepresentatives,businessschool
deans,andAssociationtoAdvanceCollegiate Schools of Business (AACSB;
2006)administrators:
Management education must develop
mechanismsforunderstandingtheessential competencies and skill sets of business school graduates, forecasting how
those competencies will change in the
future,andassessingthelevelofmastery
ofthoseskillsandcompetencies.(p.9)
Thereportexpressesfrustrationover
thelackofstrategicinteractionbetween
businessschoolsandthebusinesscommunity. Further,AACSB’s (2006) strategic management standards explicitly
called for involvement of key stakeholders in the curriculum-management
process and identified alumni and the
business community among this group
(e.g.,facultyandadministrators).
Information systems (IS) programs,
perhaps more so than other disciplines
in business schools, immediately benefit from such interaction. IS faculty
face a considerable challenge in maintaining a current, value-added curriculum that prepares students to succeed
intoday’sglobalbusinessenvironment.
In addressing this challenge, they are
constrainedandmotivatedbythereality
thatISandothercomputer-relatedpro-
grams at universities worldwide have
experienced marked drops in enrollments since the collapse of the 1990s
dot-com bubble. For this trend to be
reversed, faculty and program administrators must learn how to incorporate
new technologies, evolving standards,
and applicable regulatory conditions
effectively into their programs, so that
current and potential students perceive
alignment between what they (a) learn
intheISprogramand(b)needtobegin
andsustainacareer.Involvementofthe
business community is crucial for providingguidanceontheseissues.
In the present article, we discuss an
approach to IS curriculum assessment
thatevaluatesperceptionsofalumniinan
IS program at a large, public university
in the western United States currently
workinginthebusinesscommunity.People at the intersection of these two key
stakeholderpopulations(i.e.,alumniand
businesses) may offer rich insights into
curriculum issues because they possess
frontline knowledge of business needs
and an in-depth understanding of the
IScurriculum.Otherstakeholders—such
as recruiters, business executives, and
university administrators—are likely to
possess extensive knowledge of businessneedsortheIScurriculumbutnot
both.Moreover,whenopen-endedquestionsareaskedaboutcurriculumissues,
there is a risk of response misinterpretation unless the terminology used is
Downloaded by [Universitas Maritim Raja Ali Haji] at 22:49 11 January 2016
commonlyunderstoodbytheresearchers
and respondents. For example, such IS
curriculum-relatedconstructsassystems
analysis and project management can
have significantly different meanings to
engineers, computer scientists, and IS
graduates.EvenifISgraduatesfromseveraldifferentinstitutionsarequestioned,
their responses may include terms that
areusedinsubtlydifferentways,orthey
mayrefertocoursesthattheytookabout
which limited information is available.
In the present study, we avoided these
threats to validity by analyzing the perceptions of business- community memberswhosharewith theresearchersthe
exact vocabulary regarding the content
ofIScourses.
We begin this presentation with a
discussion of the current outlook for
IS programs and the research questions that our investigation addressed.
Then, we describe the participating IS
department’s alumni advisory board
and the approach we used to solicit its
knowledge and insight regarding what
isneededintheindustryandthevalue
of the IS curriculum in meeting those
needs.Last,wepresenttheresultsofthe
assessment and specific recommendationsandactionsthathaveresultedfrom
theevaluationprocess.
WhyCurriculumAssessmentIs
UrgentlyNeededforISPrograms
TherapidbuildupofInternet-related
companies in the late 1990s resulted
in a well-discussed hiring binge, with
muchoftheactivityfundedbyventure
capital and the proceeds from initial
publicofferings.Asanaftereffectofthe
consequentcorrection,businessschools
in the United States have seen sharp
drops in enrollment in IS degree programs. The IS department that served
as the setting for this research is typical among universities that have large
undergraduate IS programs. The numberofundergraduatesdeclaringamajor
in IS in 2006 was approximately 25%
ofthenumberin2000.Therehavebeen
similar reports from other universities,
andthephenomenonhasalsobeenseen
in majors related to such complementary disciplines as computer science
andelectricalengineering(Foster,2005;
George,Valacich,&Valor,2005).Many
universitieshavecutbackonISfaculty
becausetherehavebeentoofewstudents
tofilltheavailableseats(Frolick,Chen,
&Janz,2005).Anotherreasonstudents
maynowshuncomputer-relatedcareers
is the widespread publicity regarding
off-shoring of IT jobs. This could lead
students to consider IS careers risky
overthelong-term.
There is not likely to be a return to
the dot-com-driven enrollment trends
in IS in which graduates commonly
received multiple offers and enjoyed
starting salaries among the highest of
anybusinessmajor(NationalAssociationofCollegesandEmployers,2000).
However,theBureauofLaborStatistics
(2000)andtheFederalReserveBoard
(2005) have forecast that demand for
ISworkerswillbestrong;shortagesof
qualifiedapplicantshavebeenreported
in some parts of the United States. If
the enrollment trends in IS programs
arenotreversed,itmaybedifficultfor
futureemployerstofindadequatenumbers of qualified workers. The present research questions were designed
to capture the elements necessary to
evaluate whether the IS curriculum is
meetingoneofitsmostimportantpurposes: to prepare graduates for successful,sustainablecareersindevising
information strategies and guiding the
efforts of organizations to build and
implement systems that support those
strategies.
ResearchQuestions
The first research question aims to
give a sense of the skills that are perceivedtobemostimportantforgraduatesinachievingcareersuccess.
ResearchQuestion1(RQ1):Whatare
themostimportantskillsthatshouldbe
taughttoISmajors?
Thesecondresearchquestionassesses the value of helping students to
achieve certain industry certifications
(e.g.,CompTIA’sA+,MicrosoftCertified Systems Engineer, Cisco Certified Network Analyst). These certifications are sometimes mentioned in
job-opportunity postings, and students
often inquire about their worth. In the
ISdepartmentusedforthisstudy,there
hasbeendiscussionof(a)theoptionof
including course material specifically
intended to enable students to sit for
theassociatedexaminationsand(b)the
possibilityofrequiringstudentstopass
oneormorecertificationexamspriorto
graduation.
RQ2: Should the IS program require
students to achieve specific industry
certifications?
The third and fourth research questions relate to the practical challenges
of implementing the results of a curriculumassessmentatthecourselevel:
It is one thing to gather input from
constituenciesbutanothertoapplythat
knowledgewithrespecttocoursedevelopment,offerings,andrequirements.To
supportthiseffort,wesoughtanunderstandingabouthoweachcourseoffered
aspartoftheISprogramprovidesvalue
to the business constituency. Specifically, perceptions were sought about
whether the course should be required
orelectiveandwhattheperceivedvalue
addedmaybe.
RQ3: Which courses should be
required,andwhichshouldbeelective?
RQ4:Whatistherelativevalueadded
to the business community of each
course?
ToexploreRQ1andRQ2,theperceptions of recruiters or possibly membersofindustryassociationssuchasthe
Association for Computing Machinery
ortheAssiociationofInformationTechnology Professionals could reasonably
besought.However,perceptionsrelative
to RQ3 are only valuable if they come
from someone with firsthand experienceofthecoursesavailablefromtheIS
departmentwheretheresearchwasconducted (i.e., faculty, current students,
alumni).Ofthese,onlyalumniworking
in the business community also have
valid perceptions relevant to RQ1 and
RQ2. Thus, they represent a uniquely
valuable source of information: They
have the knowledge to address all four
oftheresearchquestions.
AlumniAdvisoryBoard
Becauseoftheobjectiveofexploring
theperceptionsofanalumnigroupthat
hasthebestpossiblegraspofthecurrent
curriculum, the assessment initiative
focusedonalumniwhohadestablished
themselvesduringtheirstudentyearsas
havingmasteredthecurriculuminplace
January/February2009
143
Downloaded by [Universitas Maritim Raja Ali Haji] at 22:49 11 January 2016
atthetime.Also,inquirieswerelimited
toalumniwhoreceivedtheirdegreesin
the last 10 years, when the curriculum
was comparable in its IS content and
emphasistotheonetoday.
Thedepartmentservingastheresearch
setting actively maintains an alumni
advisory board, with a membership
thatincludesgraduatesfromthepast10
yearswhohaveundergonepriorvetting
by the faculty about their suitability for
inclusion on the panel (Penrose, 2002).
Thedepartmentestablishedandusesthe
board to provide advice on curriculum
issues and business needs, support the
department by providing information
about career trends, and bring in board
membersasguestlecturers.
METHOD
A survey was developed to address
our research questions, and it was
administered to the alumni advisory
board.Inadditiontodemographicquestions, the survey included open-ended
questions designed to capture the skill
set required of graduates. Addressing
RQ1, the survey asked, “What are the
most important skills that should be
taughttoISmajorsattheuniversity?”
To evaluate perceptions relative to
RQ2, the survey asked, “Should the IS
majorattheuniversityrequirestudents
to achieve specific industry certifications?”and“Ifso,whatspecificcertificationsshouldberequired?”Toaddress
perceptions relative to RQ3 and RQ4,
the survey presented the respondents
withalistofcoursesthatarepresently
included in the undergraduate IS program and a brief description of each
course,whichwastakenverbatimfrom
thelatest(2005–2006)officialuniversitycatalog.1Foreachcourse,thesurvey
asked respondents to (a) recommend
whetherthecourseshouldbearequired
oranelectivecomponentoftheISprogramand(b)rateitsvaluetothemselves
andtheircareerona5-pointLikert-type
scale ranging from 1 (low value) to 5
(highvalue).
The survey was mailed to all members of the alumni advisory board in
May 2005 and was followed by an email reminder a few weeks later. Of
the 182 surveys initially sent out, 25
werereturnedashavinginvalidmailing
144
JournalofEducationforBusiness
addresses, resulting in a base of 157
possible responses. In all, 81 surveys
werereturnedovera3-monthperiodfor
a response rate of 51.6%. The respondentsindicatedameanageof32.9years
(SD=8.1years)andmeanworkexperience of 9.7 years (SD = 8.6 years). In
terms of gender, 50 (61.7%) indicated
male, 28 (34.6%) indicated female,
and3(3.7%)didnotrespond.Interms
of organization size, 11 (14.9%) had
fewer than 25 employees, 9 (12.2%)
had26–100employees,13(17.6%)had
101–500 employees, and 41 (55.4%)
hadmorethan500employees.Interms
oflocation,54(66.7%)wereintheuniversity’s local area, 10 were in adjoiningregionsofthestate(12.3%),andthe
remaining17(20.1%)wereelsewhere.
AnalysisofRQ1:ISSkillSet
A content analysis was conducted
ontheopen-endedquestion,“Whatare
themostimportantskillsthatshouldbe
taughttoISmajors?”Thisquestionelicitedawiderangeofresponses(seethe
Appendix). The results are categorized
underthreemajorthemes:communication and teamwork skills, managerial
and systems development skills, and
technicalskills,allofwhichreceiveda
largenumberofmentions.Eachtheme
was divided into subheadings that are
further divided into the actual commentsmentionedbytherespondents.
CommunicationsandTeamworkSkills
The first theme emerging from the
open-endedquestionwascommunication
and teamwork skills. Written communication, general communication, teamwork,andoralcommunicationskillsall
received frequent mention by the experienced alumni. Communication-related
skills (written, oral) were identified far
morefrequentlybytherespondentsthan
anyotherarea,evenmorethancoretopicssuchassystemsdevelopment,project
management,anddatabases.Theclarity
with which this theme emerged is evidence of the perceived career value of
goodcommunicationsskills.TheparticipatingISdepartment’sdiscussionabout
curriculum choices has been influenced
bythisfinding:Ratherthanfocusingits
attention on the relative emphasis that
thecurriculumgivestotechnicalthemes
versusbusinessthemes(atraditionaldiscussion in an IS faculty), the departmenthasbeenmotivatedtolookatways
of introducing more communication
skill-building exercises throughout the
curriculum.
ManagerialandSystemsDevelopment
Skills
The second theme emerging from
the content analysis of the open-ended
question is that of managerial- and
systems-development skills. General
project management, general managerial and systems-development skills
(includingsystemsanalysisanddesign)
were all frequently suggested by the
respondents. In particular, project-
management skills were recognized as
highly important. Thus, it would seem
that there is considerable perceived
value in the group projects commonly
assigned to students pursuing a major
inISthatgiveclassroomexperiencein
project-managementissues.
TechnicalSkills
Thethirdthemethatemergedfromthe
contentanalysisistechnicalskills.Generalprogramming,databaseanddesign,
andnetwork-computingskillsweremost
frequently perceived as important. It is
interestingthatfewspecifictechnologies
emergedfromtheresponses.Rather,the
responsessuggestthatexperiencedgraduates perceive general knowledge of a
broadrangeoftechnologiestobemore
important than in-depth specialization.
Forexample,therewaslittlementionof
teaching Oracle or Access, but general
database skills were frequently mentioned. In addition, more than twice as
manyrespondentsrecommendedgeneral
programmingskillsthanallofthementionsreceivedforspecificprogramming
languagescombined.Thiscanbeinterpretedtomeanthatrespondentsperceive
a general knowledge of programming
concepts and database systems to be
importantfortheircareers,evenasthey
moveintomanagerialroles.
Another implication of the study
is that communication and teamwork
skills occur prominently in the perceptions of experienced graduates
of the IS program. This finding suggests ways in which the faculty can
of2.4certifications(SD=1.9).However,
therewasnoclearconsensusonwhichis
mostvaluable.Generalsystems-oriented
certifications from Microsoft received
themostfrequentmention.Networking
certifications were also widely mentioned, especially those of Cisco. Project management and security-oriented
certifications received relatively infrequentmention.Thevastmajorityofthe
mentionedcertificationsfocusprimarily
ontechnicalskillsratherthanbusiness-
orientedtopics.
The certification question also capturedsomeunpromptedresponsesfrom
the alumni, including comments from
those who felt strongly in favor or
against requiring certifications. Some
recent reports hold that the value of
certifications may be overestimated,
with one survey suggesting that noncertified workers have received larger
annual pay increases than certified
workers (Pratt, 2005). According to
Pratt’sreport,thismaybebecausecertification exams have become watered
down and their value diluted as the
number of third-party teaching centers
AnalysisofRQ2:Certifications
Figure1providesdescriptivestatistics
relative to the certifications question:
“Should the IS major require students
to achieve specific industry certifications?”Amongthe31respondentswho
answeredyes(38.3%),6didnotrecommendanyspecificcertifications,andthe
remaining25recommendedanaverage
Shouldtheinformationsystems 25
majorrequirestudentstoachieve
specificindustrycertifications?
20
Linux+
SCDJWS
MCSA
No
response 15
12.3%
MCP
CCDP
CCNP
Network+
10
MCDBA
aly
sis
UML
An
ion
cat
pli
uri
ty
s
CCSP
Security+
CISSP SAP
OCP
ase
tab
ent
Da
gem
ner
rks
two
Ne
ste
ms
0
al
PMP
Ap
CAPM
A+
Sec
CCNA
Ma
na
Yes
38.3%
MCSE
5
Ge
No
49.4%
Sy
Downloaded by [Universitas Maritim Raja Ali Haji] at 22:49 11 January 2016
beproactiveaboutimprovingteaching
methodstobetterpreparestudentsfor
the workplace. A renewed emphasis
on group projects, presentations, and
writtencommunicationskillsthroughout the curriculum—in addition to
continuingtorequirestudentstocomplete a formal course of instruction
in business communications—may be
the most important set of actions that
can be taken to help graduates obtain
jobs and advance in their careers. It
is not enough to train students in the
managerial and technological aspects
of the IS field: Programs must also
produce graduates who can articulate
theirknowledge.
FIGURE1.Relativefrequencyforrequiringcertificationsandrecommendedcertificationsforthoseanswering“yes.”CAPM=certified
associateinprojectmanagement;CCDP=Ciscocertifieddesignprofessional;CCNA=Ciscocertifiednetworkassociate;CCNP=Ciscocertified
networkprofessional;CCSP=Ciscocertifiedsecurityprofessional;CISSP
=certifiedinformationsystemssecurityprofessional;MCDBA=Microsoft
certifieddatabaseadministrator;MCP=Microsoftcertifiedprofessional;
MCSA=Microsoftcertifiedsystemsadministrator;MCSE=Microsoftcertifiedsystemsengineer;OCP=Oraclecertifiedprofessional;PMP=project
managementprofessional;SAP=systems,applications,andproducts;
SCDJWS=suncertifieddeveloperforJavaWebservices;UML=unified
modelinglanguage.
has grown. Nevertheless, certifications
are still reported to be good differentiatorsforentry-levelcandidates.Those
who favored certifications (38.3%)
often cited (a) the advantage that they
would provide graduates entering the
workforce and (b) the opportunity for
advancement after entering the workforce. Comments supporting this positionincludedthefollowing:“Technical
certification will help graduates compete with computer science majors for
jobs. Businesses do not seem to favor
thebusinessorientationofthe[IS]program, all things being equal”; “If the
student wants to work with systems
on a technical level, then they should
also consider looking into a technical certificate. Lots of people start out
withtechnicalpositionsandmoveinto
managerialpositionfromtherebecause
they technically understand the system”; and “To avoid entry-level work,
best to get certified so that graduates
can get hired with better skill set and
advancemorequickly.”
Those recommending against requiring certifications (49.4%) also included
some unsolicited comments explaining
their opposition. This group of respondents seemed to associate certifications
with technical schools or computer scienceschoolsratherthan4-yearbusiness
degrees. Others viewed certification as
something that would be useful after a
graduatehaschosenacareerpath.Comments supporting this position included
the following: “No! Don’t do that.You
aren’ta[communitycollege]orvocationalschool—teachISfolkshowtothink”;
“I think IT needs to remain a business
degreenotcomputerscience”;and“This
comes later. Too much pressure—and
maykeepyounarrowlyfocused.”
A prominent third view of certifications was that they should be optional.
Therespondentswiththatviewtendedto
answernoorneithertothecertification
question,andtheyexpressedmixedattitudestowardcertificationsandtheirrole
intheISprogram.Commentsrepresentativeofthisviewincludedthefollowing:
“I feel that the certifications should be
offered as an option or elective. They
are sometimes required for a position,
but many employers will pay for the
training. It can give an advantage if
student already has the certification”;
January/February2009
145
Downloaded by [Universitas Maritim Raja Ali Haji] at 22:49 11 January 2016
“This should be an individual choice,
perhapsanelectivecourse”;and“Ithink
[theuniversity]shouldpresenttheoptions
butnotrequirethem.Itdependsonif[the
university]wantstocompetewithITT....
Getting certified in CISCO networks is
morelikeatradeinmyopinion.”
Thus,perceptionsrelatedtotheissue
of certifications appear to be contentious and represent a tradeoff between
two categories of skills that emerged
fromRQ1:(a)managerialandsystemsdevelopment skills and (b) technical
skills. The responses should be interpretedcautiously,butthereisanadvantageinknowingthattherespondentsas
a group were thinking about the certification question within the framework
of the present curriculum structure. If
the curriculum was to be modified to
emphasize the technical skills needed
forcertificationexams,therewouldbea
costintermsofreducingthemanagerial
andsystems-developmentcontentofthe
courses.Iftheknowledgeneededtosit
for the exams could be acquired without cost, there would be every reason
to do so. The advantage of surveying
individuals with knowledge of the curriculum and the needs of the business
constituency is that they are able to
evaluate the costs and benefits. It can
be concluded from this question that
there is a widespread perception that
certifications can be useful for helping
new graduates gain entry to the workforce, but that the managerial and systems-development skills in the current
curriculumarevaluableforsustaininga
careerovertime.
AnalysisofRQ3:Course
Requirements
ToanalyzeRQ3,thesurveypresented
the respondents with a list of courses
that are presently included in the participating university’s undergraduate
IS program and a brief description of
each course; it asked respondents to
recommend whether the course should
be a required or elective component
of the IS program. Figure 2 summarizestheresponses.AWilcoxon-Mann-
Whitney test (Siegel & Castellan,
1988) was conducted to determine if
thealumniresponseswerealignedwith
thecurrentdesignationsofrequiredand
146
JournalofEducationforBusiness
Electivecourses
Requiredcourses
ISanalysis
Reportingtechniquesforbusinessprofessionals
ISdesign
IStechnology
Datamanagementsystems
Businessapplicationprogramming
ManagementofIS
Projectmanagement
Networkinganddatacommunications
Statitisticalanalysisforbusiness
Informationtechnologyprojects
E-businessandwebdevelopment
Advancedprogrammingforbusiness
Javaprogrammingforbusinessapplications
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
PercentageofRespondents
100%
FIGURE2.Relativefrequencyofrespondentsrecommendingcurrent
informationsystems(IS)majorcoursesasrequiredcurriculum.
elective courses. TheWilcoxon-MannWhitney test was chosen because it
only requires data in ordinal format
(Siegel&Castellan).Otherapproaches,
suchasaggregatingthesevenrequired
courses and comparing them with the
aggregation of the elective courses,
would be overly sensitive to outliers,
and,inthiscase,wouldundulyreduce
theratingsoftheelectivecourses(e.g.,
Javaprogrammingforbusinessapplications; see Figure 2) and be less informative of the overall mix of courses.
Therequiredcourseswereratedsignificantly higher—in terms of their rank
order with regard to recommendations
for required curriculum—than were
the elective courses (Wilcoxon-MannWhitney = 33, p = .015). Overall, the
existing designations of required and
electivecoursesseemtobewellaligned
with the perceptions of the business
community.
In Figure 2, the three courses with
the highest percentages of respondents
recommending the course as required
curriculum are shown to be systems
analysis (95.8%), reporting techniques
(90.3%), and systems design (90.1%).
The reporting-techniques course is a
purelycommunications-orientedpartof
thecurriculum,anditsprominentposi-
tioninthefigurereinforcesthefinding
from RQ1 that experienced graduates
perceiveaneedforstronginterpersonal
andcommunicationsskills.Theanalysis
and design courses deal primarily with
analysis of business IS requirements
andmappingtechnicalsolutionstobusiness problems. Thus, they align more
with the managerial and system-developmentskillscategoryintheAppendix
thanwiththetechnicalskillscategory.
Thethreecourseswiththelowestpercentagesofrespondentsrecommending
the course as required curriculum fall
intothetechnicalskillscategoryinthe
Appendix: Web development (43.1%),
advanced programming (29.2%), and
Java programming (16.7%). On the
whole,Figure2supportstheideasthat
experienced graduates tend to favor
emphasizing managerial and systemsdevelopmenttopicsovertechnicalmaterial and that communications skills are
perceivedasimportant.
TwocoursesstandoutinFigure2as
beingoutofalignmentwiththerespondents’ perceptions of what should be
requiredinthecurriculum.IStechnology is presently an elective course,
and networking and data communications are required. However, the share
of respondents who perceived that IS
Downloaded by [Universitas Maritim Raja Ali Haji] at 22:49 11 January 2016
technology should be required was
greater than that of those who perceived that networking and data communicationsshouldberequired.Interpretingthisresultwouldbeespecially
difficult if the sampling frame were
the general population of the business
constituency. However, because the
respondents were each familiar with
the actual content of the courses as
they are currently offered, this can be
recognized as entirely consistent with
the perception that technical material
shouldbecoveredbroadly,ratherthan
deeply,asnotedintheanalysisofRQ1.
IS technology covers a broad array
of computer and communications topics,withanemphasisondevelopinga
vocabularyandbackgroundthatenables
students to evaluate the significance
of future developments in technology.
Networkinganddatacommunications,
however,delvedeeplyintoaparticular
facetoftechnology:networking.
AnalysisofRQ4:ValueAddedof
CourseContent
ToanalyzeRQ4,therespondentswere
presentedwithalistofcoursesthatare
presently included in the undergraduate IS program, and the respondents
wereaskedtoratethevalueofeachto
themselvesandtheircareerona5-point
Likert-type scale ranging from 1 (low
value)to5(highvalue).Theresultsare
summarized in Figure 3. The required
courseswereratedsignificantlyhigher,
intermsoftheirrankorderwithregard
to career value, than were the elective
courses (Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney =
34,p=.022).Thus,thedesignationsof
requiredandelectivecoursesseemtobe
wellalignedwiththevalueperceptions
ofthebusinesscommunity.
Again, it can be seen that the communications course and the system
analysis and design courses have the
highest mean value ratings and that
the programming and Web-development courses have mean value ratingsamongthelowest.Ingeneral,this
comports with the findings from RQ3
that experienced graduates perceive
managerial and systems-development
coursecontenttobeespeciallyimportant to them. Two courses, Management of IS and Business Application
Electivecourses
Requiredcourses
Reportingtechniquesforbusinessprofessionals
ISanalysis
ISdesign
Datamanagementsystems
Businessapplicationprogramming
Projectmanagement
IStechnology
Informationtechnologyprojects
Networkinganddatacommunications
ManagementofIS
E-businessandwebdevelopment
Advancedprogrammingforbusiness
Javaprogrammingforbusinessapplications
Statitisticalanalysisforbusiness
1
2
3
4
5
FIGURE3.Meanvalueassignedtoinformationsystems(IS)majorcoursesaccordingtoalumni.Alumniwereaskedtoevaluatethe“valueofthe
coursetoyouandyourcareer”ona5-pointLikert-typescaleranging
from1(lowvalue)to5(highvalue).
Programming, appear to be out of
placeintherankingsunderthisinterpretation.ManagementofISisnominally a management-oriented course,
but it is ranked toward the bottom
of the list, whereas Business Application Programming is a technically
oriented course that is ranked in the
top half. Again, there is less dissonance in this result than is suggested
by the names and simple descriptions
of the courses. For respondents who
haveknowledgeofthecoursesasthey
have actually been taught and delivered, Management of IS is viewed
as mostly containing technical contentdealingwithadministrationissues
related to IT infrastructure. Business
Application Programming, however,
is a course that emphasizes general
programming concepts and how they
applytobusinesssystems,andituses
a particular programming language to
illustrate those issues. In general, the
resultssummarizedinFigure3support
the same themes that emerged from
theanalysisoftheRQ1,RQ2,RQ3:(a)
Communications skills are perceived
to be important, (b) it is more important to give students a broad understanding of technology concepts than
todelvedeeplyintoparticulartechnol-
ogies, and (c) it is perceived that the
systems-development content of the
curriculum has a great deal of value
toexperiencedgraduatesinsustaining
theircareers.
Conclusion
TheIScomponentofbusinessschool
educationisfacinguniquecircumstances, and the need for alignment among
the objectives of the business constituency and the content of the curriculum has been articulated by many. In
the present research, we sought insight
from alumni in the business community to assess the program and courses
offeredbytheISdepartmentthatserved
astheresearchsetting.Theresultspresented in this article provide guidance
toward achieving alignment between
theIScurriculumandneedsofthebusinesscommunity.
Themainconclusionsfromtheanalysisarethefollowing:(a)TheISprogram
should have opportunities built in for
the development of interpersonal communications skills; (b) a broad range
of technical topics should be covered
in the curriculum, rather than a focus
on in-depth coverage of a few specific
hardware or software environments or
January/February2009
147
Downloaded by [Universitas Maritim Raja Ali Haji] at 22:49 11 January 2016
programminglanguages;and(c)acore
competency in systems development,
project management, and business and
managerialskillsshouldbeacquiredby
studentsintheISprogram.
IfanISfacultysucceedsinachieving
these objectives, the resulting curriculumwillbedistinctfromwhatistaught
inrelateddisciplines,suchascomputer
science.Studentswhoaremainlyinterested in specializing in one or more
specific areas of technology may be
better served by a computer science
or engineering degree. The responses
to the survey questions are persuasive:
Business constituency needs graduates
whocanhelpthemtoimplementstrategicITinitiativesintheirorganizations.
There are a number of limitations
and boundaries that may reduce the
degree to which these findings can be
generalized. The scope of the research
wasaspecificcurriculumforgraduates
workingpredominantlyinoneregionin
the western United States. The results
may differ for graduates of other universities with their own unique curricula or even for similar students and
curriculainotherregionsofthecountry
withdifferenteconomiesandindustries.
Eveninthecontextoftheparticipating
university’s program and its regional
economy, the IS field is continually
changing. Thus, the views of experiencedgraduatesmaychangeovertime,
and the research presented here should
be repeated periodically as part of an
ongoingassessmentprocess.
The responses to the curriculumassessment portion of the survey (i.e.,
rating the value of each course and
whether the course should be required
or elective in the curriculum) has at
least two limitations. First, the value
construct was measured with a single
item to keep the length of the survey
manageable,eventhoughitwouldhave
been preferable to capture this rating
usingmultipleitems.Second,responses
148
JournalofEducationforBusiness
to these items may be influenced by
whichinstructortaughtthecoursewhen
therespondentwasinschooland,inthe
case of elective courses, whether the
respondenthadtakenthecourse.
BecauseISdepartmentshaverecently
beenchallengedbydecliningenrollments,
they need a framework for evaluating
their curricula and making adjustments
that improve alignment with the needs
of their stakeholders. Ongoing assessment through interaction with the businesscommunitycanhelptoensurethat
the needs of the stakeholders are being
metbydeterminingifthoseneedshave
changed or are no longer being met
by the curriculum. Graduates from the
preceding10-yearperiodareinaunique
position to inform this process because
they are knowledgeable of the curriculum and the requirements of industry.
By drawing on their knowledge of the
kindsofworkresponsibilitiesthegraduates are likely to confront over time,
skills can be identified that help sustain successful careers.Also, a courseby-course evaluation of the curriculum
helps to avoid unwarranted assumptionsaboutthevalueofthatcurriculum.
Although the importance of the findings may vary from one university to
the next, depending on its unique local
situation,universitiesareencouragedto
use these results for guidance and to
adaptandimprovethemethodologypreviously described as they conduct their
individualassessments.
NOTES
1. Co