2017 Mutu Sesi 4 Bahan Bacaan Effect Analysis Tool to Review the Process of Ordering and Administrating Potassium Chloride
MedicationSafety
Using Healthcare Failure Mode
and Effect Analysis Tool to Review
the Process of Ordering and
Administrating Potassium Chloride
and Potassium Phosphate
RosminEsmail,CherylCummings,DeonneDersch,GregDuchscherer,JudyGlowa,GailLiggett,
TerranceHulmeandthePatientSafetyandAdverseEventsTeam*
CalgaryHealthRegion,Calgary,Alberta,Canada
Abstract
During the spring of 2004, in the Calgary Health Region (CHR)
two critical incidents occurred involving patients receiving
continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) in the intensive
care unit (ICU). The outcome of these events resulted in the
sudden death of both patients.
The Department of Critical Care Medicine’s Patient Safety
and Adverse Events Team (PSAT), utilized the Healthcare Failure
Mode and Effect Analysis (HFMEA) tool to review the process
and conditions surrounding the ordering and administration of
potassium chloride (KCl) and potassium phosphate (KPO4) in
our ICUs.
The HFMEA tool and the multidisciplinary team structure
provided a solid framework for systematic analysis and prioritization of areas for improvement regarding the use of intravenous,
high-concentration KCL and KPO4 in the ICU.
INTRODUCTION
“An83-year-oldwomanwhowasapatientinthecardiovascularcareunitattheFoothillsMedicalCenter(FMC)
site of the CHR died suddenly in the presence of her
physicianandmembersofherfamily.Shewasalertand
orientedatthetimeandhercondition,whileveryserious,
didnotseemtoindicatereasonsforimmediateconcern.
Herunexpecteddeathwasdevastatingforherfamilyand
extremelydistressingforallthoseinvolvedinhercare.An
ICUphysiciansuspectedthecause—thecompositionof
dialysatesolutionbeingusedtotreatherkidneyfailure.
Thiswasquicklyconfirmedand30bagsofthesolution
madeinthesamebatchwereremovedfrompatientcare
areas,undoubtedlypreventingthedeathsofotherpatients.
Ananalysisoftheotherbagsfromthatbatchaswellas
asystematicreviewofpatientrecordsidentifiedasecond
patientwhosedeath,oneweekearlier,waslikelycausedby
thesamesetofcircumstances.Thiswasnotsuspectedatthe
timeofdeathduetothepatient’sseriouscondition.”
For the Calgary Health Region (CHR), patient safety was
broughttotheforefrontinthespringof2004,whentherewere
twocriticalincidentsthatresultedinthedeathoftwopatients
Upon further investigation, it was determined that in
receivingCRRTintwodifferentICUsoftheCHR(ISMPalert February2004,pharmacytechniciansinthecentralproduction
March25,2004).Hereisabriefdescriptionoftheincidents facilityoftheCHRpharmacydepartmentpreparedadialysate
fromtheExternalPatientSafetyReview(June2004):
solutionforpatientsreceivingCRRT.Duringtheprocess,KCL
H E A LT H CA R E Q U A R T E R LY V O L . 8 , S P E C I A L I S S U E • O C T O B E R 2 0 0 5
| 73
UsingHealthcareFailureModeandEffectAnalysisTool Rosmin Esmail et al.
wasinadvertentlyaddedtothedialysatebagsinsteadofsodium
chloride(NaCl)solution.Itisbelievedthattheseincorrectly
preparedsolutionswereusedinthedialysisofthetwopatients
whodied(ExternalPatientSafetyReview,CHRJune2004).
The CHR publicly disclosed the facts and initiated an
externalpatientsafetyreview.TheDepartmentofCriticalCare
Medicine(DCCM)alsoundertookareviewoftheprocessfor
orderingandadministeringintravenous,high-concentration
KClandKPO4,usingtheHFMEAtooldevelopedbyDeRosier,
Josephetal.(2002).Thefocusofthisarticleistodescribethe
applicationofthetoolwithrespecttoreviewingtheprocesses
involved in ordering and administering intravenous, highconcentrationKClandKPO4,therebyallowingtheDCCM
toproactivelyidentifyhazardsthatmayexistandestablisha
saferprocess.
BACKGROUND
toolforriskassessmentinthehealthcarefield.TheHFMEA
toolwasformedbycombiningindustry’sFMEAmodelwith
theU.S.FoodandDrugAdministration’sHazardAnalysisand
CriticalControlPoint(HACCP)tooltogetherwithcomponentsfromtheVA’srootcauseanalysis(RCA)process.HACCP
wasdevelopedtoprotectfoodfromchemicalandbiological
contamination and physical hazards.The HACCP system
usessevensteps:(1)conductahazardanalysis,(2)identify
criticalcontrolpoints,(3)establishcriticallimits,(4)establishmonitoringprocedures,(5)establishcorrectiveactions,
(6)establishverificationprocedures,and(7)establishrecordkeepinganddocumentationprocedures(CenterforFoodSafety
andAppliedNutrition,1997).Itusesquestionstoprobefor
foodsystemvulnerabilitiesaswellasadecisiontreetoidentify
criticalcontrolpoints.Thedecisiontreeconceptwasadapted
bytheVAfortheHFMEAtool.
TheHFMEAtoolhasbeensubsequentlyrecognizedinthe
WhitePaperpreparedbytheAmericanSocietyforHealthcare
RiskManagement(ASHRM).Inanefforttogloballysharethe
meritsofthisprocess,avideo,instructionalCDandworksheets
ontheuseandapplicationofHFMEAhasbeensenttoevery
hospitalCEOintheUStobesharedwithindividualsandrisk
managersresponsibleforpatientsafety(AmericanSocietyfor
HealthRiskManagement2002).
TheDCCMhasbeenengagedinongoingqualityimprovementandpatientsafetyinitiativesbothformallyandinformallyforover10years(Esmailetal.2005).Atpresent,the
regionincludesthreeadultacutecareteachinghospitalsand
onepediatrichospital:FoothillsMedicalCentre(FMC),Peter
LougheedCenter(PLC),RockyviewGeneralHospital(RGH)
andtheAlbertaChildren’sHospital.TheDepartmentofCritical
CareMedicineoverseesfouradultintensivecareunits:
•A24-bedMultisystemICU(FMC)
HFMEA TOOL
•A14-bedCardiovascularICU(FMC)
TherearefivestepsintheHFMEAtool.Steponeistodefine
•A12-bedMultisystemICUs(PLC)
thetopic;steptwoistoassembletheteam;stepthreerequires
•A10-bedMultisystemICUs(RGH)
thedevelopmentofaprocessmapforthetopicandconsecutivelynumberingeachstepandsubstepsofthatprocess;step
HFMEA VS FAILURE MODE AND EFFECT
fouristoconductthehazardanalysis.Thisstepinvolvesfour
ANALYSIS (FMEA)
processes:theidentificationoffailuremodes,identificationof
Inthepast,medicineusedahumanerrorapproachwhich thecausesofthesefailuremodes,scoringeachfailuremode
identifiedtheindividualasthecauseoftheadverseevent. usingtheHazardScoringMatrix,andworkingthroughthe
Wenowrecognizethaterrorsarecausedbysystemorprocess DecisionTreeAnalysis.Thefinalstepistodevelopactionsand
failures(McNallyetal.1997).FMEAwasdevelopedforuse outcomes.ThenextsectionwilldescribehowtheDCCM’s
bytheUnitedStatesmilitaryandisutilizedbytheNational PatientSafetyandAdverseEventsteam(PSAT)workedthrough
AeronauticsandSpaceAdministration(NASA),topredict eachstepoftheHFMEAtooltoreviewtheprocessofordering
and evaluate potential failures and unrecognized hazards processoforderingintravenous,high-concentrationKCland
andtoproactivelyidentifystepsinaprocessthatcouldhelp KPO4.
reduceoreliminateafailurefromoccurring(Reilingetal.
2003).FMEAfocusesonthesystemwithinanenvironment HFMEA — Step One
andusesamultidisciplinaryteamtoevaluateaprocessfroma SteponeistodefinetheHFMEAtopic.Thetopicisusuallya
qualityimprovementperspective.TheJointCommissionfor processthathashighvulnerabilitiesandpotentialforimpacting
AccreditationofHealthcareOrganizations(JCAHO)inthe patientsafety.ItisimportantinaHFMEAanalysistodefine
UShasrecommendedthathealthcareinstitutionsconduct boundariesandlimitthescopeofthetopicbeingreviewed.
proactiveriskmanagementactivitiesthatidentifyandpredict
Followingthetwopreviouslymentionedcriticalincidents,
systemweaknessesandadoptchangestominimizepatientharm tworeviewswereconductedintheCHR.Thefirstwasan
(Adachietal.2001).
internalreviewandwasconductedbythePatientSafetyTask
In2001theVeteran’sAdministration(VA)NationalCentre Force,andthesecondwasconsideredexternalandperformed
forPatientSafety(NCPS)specificallydesignedtheHFMEA bytheExternalPatientSafetyReviewCommittee(June2004).
74 | H E A LT H CA R E Q U A R T E R LY V O L . 8 , S P E C I A L I S S U E • O C T O B E R 2 0 0 5
Rosmin Esmail et al. UsingHealthcareFailureModeandEffectAnalysisTool
Duringthesametime,inresponsetothetragiceventsfrom
March2004,disparateandpoorlycoordinatedchangesinpolicy
regardingthestorageanduseofhighlyconcentratedpotassium
wereinitiatedwithintheregionalICUs.Thedepartment’sICU
executivecouncildeterminedtheneedtoundertakeareview
oftheprocessforthegeneralhandlingofintravenous,highconcentrationKClandKPO4 priortoreviewingtheprocess
ofpreparingCRRTbagsfordialysis.Itwasunderstoodthat
someofthestepsinthisprocesswouldoverlapwiththeCRRT
process.
HFMEA — Step Two
SteptwointheHFMEAtoolistoassembleateam.Theteam
shouldincludesixtoeightmultidisciplinarymemberswhoare
involvedintheprocessbeinganalyzedandaretosomedegree
considered“subjectmatter”experts.
Thedepartment’sPSATwasassignedthistask.Theteamwas
co-ledbyanintensivistandthedepartment’squalityimprovementandpatientsafetyconsultant.Theteamwasmultidisciplinary,withtwointensivists,threerespiratorytherapists,two
nursingeducators,twofrontlinenursingstafffromeachhospital
siteandtwopharmacists.Theteamhadbeenpreviouslyworking
onchartreviewsofadverseeventsusingtheIHItriggertool
methodology(Rozichetal.2003)andstaffeducationwith
respecttoincidentsandincidentreporting.Theteammetevery
otherweekoveratwo-monthperiod(AprilandMay2004).
HFMEA — Step Three
StepthreeoftheHFMEAtoolrequiresthedevelopmentofa
processmapforthetopicandconsecutivelynumberingeach
stepandsubstepsofthatprocess.Iftheprocessistoocomplex,
aspecificareawithintheoverallprocesscanbefocusedupon.
Theteamidentified11stepsintheprocessoforderingand
administeringKClandKPO4(Figure1).Afterreviewingthese
11steps,theteamfocusedontwocriticalsteps:obtainingthe
drug(step#6)andmixingthedrug(step#7)andthenidentified
thesubstepsforeachofthesetwoHFMEAsteps(Figure2).Site
visitstoreviewwhereKCLandKPO4werestoredandconversationswithfrontlinestaffintheunitstoverifytheprocesswere
alsoconducted.
Figure1:ProcessforOrderingPotassiumChloride/PotassiumPhosphateattheFoothills
MedicalCentre
STEP 1
Pre-order lab
through
OPSCAR/TDS
STEP 2
Order ordered by
residents or
attending; or
residents/attending
may tell nurse to
order in TDS
STEP 3
Print out order –
2 copies (1 copy in
unit, 1 copy in
pharmacy)
STEP 4
Unit Clerk takes
order to beside
STEP 5
Unit clerk gets
attention of nurse
re; order but this
does not always
occur
STEP 6
Nurse gets drug
from narcotic
cupboard
6A. Pharmacy assistant stocks
narcotic cupboard.
6B. Nurse gets the key.
6C. Nurse goes to narcotic
cupboard in desk A.
6D. Opens narcotic cupboard.
6E. Gets KCI or KPO4
6F. Locks cupboard.
*Sign for KCI
*If any discard then co-sign.
6G. Nurse puts key back.
STEP 11
Patient monitoring
of drug
STEP 10
Patient gets drug
STEP 9
Nurse administers
the drug
STEP 8
Nurse brings drug to
bedside or can be
another RN
STEP 7
Nurse mixes and
labels drug if
potassium
phosphate. Another
RN can mix if busy
DAY- pharmacy
mixes Kphosphate
NIGHT- (22000700)- Nurse mixes
7A. Nurse takes KPO4
7B. Need to do calculations
(rate and volume).
7C. Mix and label drug.
H E A LT H CA R E Q U A R T E R LY V O L . 8 , S P E C I A L I S S U E • O C T O B E R 2 0 0 5 | 75
DAY- pharmacy
mixes Kphosphate
NIGHT- (22000700)- Nurse mixes
7A. Nurse takes KPO4
7B. Need to do calculations
(rate and volume).
7C. Mix and label drug.
UsingHealthcareFailureModeandEffectAnalysisTool Rosmin Esmail et al.
Figure2:FailureModesforStep6and7
Step#6:NursegetsDrugfromNarcoticsCupboard
6A
Pharmacy Assistant
stocks narcotic
cupboard
Failure Mode:
1. Stocking Error.
6B
Nurse gets the key
6C
Nurse goes to
narcotic cupboard in
Desk A
6D
Opens narcotic
cupboard
Failure Mode:
1. Key not there.
6E
Gets KCI or KPO4
Failure Mode:
1. Picks the wrong
drug
6F
Locks cupboard
* Sign for KCL
*If any discard then
co-sign
6G
Nurse puts key back
Failure Mode:
1. Leave discard
on counter
This Failure Mode is
illustrated on the
worksheet
Step#7:NurseMixesandLabelsDrugifPotassiumPhosphate
7A
Nurse takes KPO4
7B
Need to do
calculations (rate
and volume)
7C
Mix and label drug
Failure Mode:
1. Nurse takes
wrong drug.
Failure Mode:
1. No worksheet/
reference to do
calculations.
Failure Mode:
1. Incorrect mixing.
2. No routine double checking
of mixing
3. Inaccurate (not reliable) label.
4. Stab bag by accident.
5. Forget to sign or co-sign
waste.
6. Put solution in wrong bag.
7. Not throwing out waste.
HFMEA —Step Four
InstepfouroftheHFMEAtool,theareaoffocusisfurther
narrowedusingthefollowingfourprocesses:identificationof
failuremodes,identificationofthecausesofthesefailuremodes,
scoringeachfailuremodeusingtheHazardScoringMatrix,
andworkingthroughtheDecisionTreeAnalysis(DeRosieret
al.2002).Theteamidentifiedthefailuremodesforsteps#6
and#7(Figure2).Thefailuremodesthatreceivedthehighest
hazardsscoreswere:nurseselectingthewrongdrug,distractions
whenmixingandinaccurate,orincompletelabels.Usingthe
HFMEAdecisiontreeanalysis,theteamworkedthrougheach
hazardtodetermineifitneededfurtheraction.
This Failure
Mode is
illustrated on
the worksheet
orcontributingfactorsandneedtobespecificandconcrete.
Frontlinestaffinvolveddirectlyintheprocessneedtoreview
them.Actionscanthenbetestedpriortoimplementationusing
theImprovementModelmethodologythatincludestesting
changesusingthePlan-Do-Study-Act(PDSA)cycle(Langley
etal.1996).Outcomesmustbemeasurable,withadefined
samplingstrategy,settimeframeformeasurementandwitha
realisticwell-articulatedgoal.
Eleven recommendations were developed based on this
analysis(AppendixI).Theserecommendationswereplaced
intotwocategories,generalandICU-specific,andsubsequently
presentedtotheICUexecutivecouncilinJuly2004.These
recommendationsaddressedhowKClandKPO4aretobe
HFMEA — Step Five
storedandwho,where,andhowthedrugsaretobemixed.
InstepfiveoftheHFMEAtool,actionsaredeveloped.Actions Theserecommendationsalsofocusedontheidentificationof
toaddresstheidentifiedhazardsneedtofocusonrootcauses look-alikeandsound-alikeproductsbasedonhumanfactor
76 | H E A LT H CA R E Q U A R T E R LY V O L . 8 , S P E C I A L I S S U E • O C T O B E R 2 0 0 5
Rosmin Esmail et al. UsingHealthcareFailureModeandEffectAnalysisTool
principles(Gosbeeetal.2002andWickensetal.2004).Key
recommendationsweresummarizedintoanactionplanwith
delegated responsibility and timelines for implementation
(Figure3).
Implementation of the recommendations has proven to
bemoredifficultthantheHFMEAprocessitself.Oncethe
recommendationswerepresentedandapprovedatICUexecutivecouncil,thosethatwerekeyICU-specificrecommendationswereprimarilydelegatedtopharmacy,unitpatientcare
managers(PCMs)andunitdirectorsandPSATforimplementationwithspecifiedtimelines.Forexample,forrecommendation
#2,a“safetysnippet”onthesevenrightsofdrugadministration
wasdevelopedbyaPSATmemberandpostedontheinternal
DCCMwebsitetoeducatestaff.Recommendationsthathada
broaderregionalimpactweresharedwiththeregion’sworking
grouponhigh-riskmedicationswhoweredevelopingaregional
policyonKCl.Theregionisalsointheprocessofdeveloping
standardlabelsforlook-alikeandsound-alikedrugs.
ofthenumerousstepsinvolvedinadministratingthismedicationanditbecameobviousthatthereweremanyopportunities
forerrorstooccur.HFMEAenabledtheteamtoprioritizethe
criticalitemsofacomplexprocessandtookthesubjectivityout
oftheanalysis.
ThemultidisciplinarystructureofPSATallowedmembersto
identifyeachstepfromtheirownprofessionalpracticeperspective.ThePSATcompositionalsogenerateddiverseideaswhen
brainstormingactionsandallowedforgooddiscussionand
deliberation,whichultimatelypromotedteambuilding.
HFMEAwasaneasytooltousebyallmembersoftheteam.
Itmadetheapproachtoaverycomplicatedprocessrelatively
straightforward.UsingtheHFMEAtool,thetwoleaderswere
abletofocustheteamonthespecificcomponentsofthetool.
Thetoolenabledtheteamtodevelopastructuredoutlineofthe
goalsthatneededtobeaccomplishedateachmeeting.Theteam
hasalsousedthistooltoanalyzethehazardsoftheprocessfor
preparingCRRTbagsfordialysispatientsintheICU.
AlthoughtheworkofthePSATwasextremelyvaluable
DISCUSSION
forthedepartment,itwasalsotimeconsuming.Itwouldbe
TE AM LE SSONS LE ARNE D
appropriatetoconductaHFMEAanalysisononeortwohighHFMEAwaswellrecognizedbythePSATanditprovided prioritytopicsperyearashasbeenrecommendedbytheJoint
asolidframeworkforthestep-by-stepanalysisofpotassium CommissiononAccreditationofHealthCareOrganizationsin
orderingandadministration.Theteammemberswereunaware theUnitedStates(Adachietal.2001).
Figure3:WorksheetforFailureModels6E1and7C3
Follow-upDate
December,2005
December2005
#ofinaccuratelabels
beingfilledinbystaff
Pharmacy,PCMs,unit Person/
directors,PSATteam Responsible
•numberofstaff
educatedon7rights
•Sodiumphosphate
substitutedforpotassiumphosphate
•Improvedlabelingof
lookalikeandsound
alikedrugs
PCMsandunit
directors
Recommendation8a Recommendations#2, Action
inAppendix1
#3,#6
inAppendix1
Yes
Proceed?
OutcomeMeasure
Yes
ExistingControl
Measure?
No
Major
Major
No
Distractions,doctor
callsnurse,time
constraints
SinglePoint
Weakness?
7C3
HazardScore
Inaccurate
label(not
reliable)
12
Nurseinahurry,
frustratedlookingfor
key,chaseafterresidentforverbalorder
andputinwrongbox,
inconsistentlabel
frompharmacy(look-
alikedrug)
HPMEA–IdentifyActionsandOutcomes
9
6E1
Frequent
Picksthe
wrongdrug
Occasional
PotentialCauses
Severity
FailureMode:
Probability
HFMEAStep4–HazardAnalysis
H E A LT H CA R E Q U A R T E R LY V O L . 8 , S P E C I A L I S S U E • O C T O B E R 2 0 0 5 | 77
UsingHealthcareFailureModeandEffectAnalysisTool Rosmin Esmail et al.
Pharmacy Lessons Learned
Thedialysatemanufacturingerrorcameasaharshreminder
totheCHR’spharmacydepartmentofitsneedforstructured
policiesandproceduresforerroravoidance.Thiserroroccurred
despiteexistingsafetyproceduresthatincludingfourdouble
checksbypharmacists.Therisksassociatedwithintravenous
potassiumcametotheforefrontofthepharmacydepartment’s
focusandtherewasaheightenedawarenessofpharmacy’srole
inpatientsafety.
Since 2002, intravenous high concentration KCL vials
have not been available in most patient care areas in the
CHR.PremixedKCLbagsareavailableandanyspecialbags
notcommerciallyavailablearetobemixedinthepharmacy
department.ThesepoliciesarebasedontheISMPCanada
recommendations (2002) and also reiterated in the PSAT
recommendations.Priortotheincidents,intravenouspotassium
vialswereavailableinthenightdispensaryforusewhilethe
pharmacywasclosed;thesehavenowbeenreplacedbypremixed
bags.Theonlyvialsofintravenouspotassiumavailableoutside
thepharmacydepartmentincludeasmallsupplyofKClvials
keptinnarcoticcupboardsofcriticalcareanddialysisunits.
ThesevialsaretobeusedforspecialCRRTsolutionsonly.
Beforethedialysatemanufacturingerroroccurred,intravenouspotassiumvialswerestoredontheregulardrugshelves
withinthepharmacydepartment.Sincetheerror,allintravenouspotassiumvialsarestoredinaseparate,lockedarea
within the pharmacy. All intravenous potassium vials and
minibagsarenowlabelledwithawarningstickertofurther
distinguish them, as per the recommendation from ISMP
Canada(ISMPalert2002).
Additionally,drugidentificationnumbershavebeenadded
tothemanufacturingworksheetsusedbypharmacytechniciansinthesterileproductpreparationarea.Thisaddsredundancythroughcheckingoftheprocedureforsterileproducts,
includingdialysate.Batchesofdialysatearenowquarantined
untilpotassiumlevelsineachbatchareconfirmedtobezeroby
laboratorytesting.
By changing preparation, manufacturing, labelling and
storageproceduresforintravenouspotassiumproducts,therisk
oferrorhasbeensubstantiallyreduced.
CONCLUSION
ThisarticledescribedtheuseoftheHFMEAtooldevelopedby
theVAanditsapplicationintheprocessoforderingandadministrating intravenous high-concentration KCL and KPO4.
Elevenrecommendationsresultedfromthisanalysis.TheICUspecificrecommendationsthatdidnotincurcostswereimplementedexpeditiously.Generalrecommendations,whichwere
notunderthepurviewoftheDCCM,weresharedwithCHR’s
RegionalPatientSafetyCommittee,whichhassincedeveloped
aregionalpolicyonKCl.
Inadditiontothiswork,theknowledgeandunderstanding
gainedfromtheapplicationoftheHFMEAtoolbyDCCM’s
PSATwillbesharedwiththeRegionalPatientSafetyTransport
workinggroupreviewingpatienttransportbetweenhospitals.
Thisgrouphasbeenformedbasedonrecommendationsfrom
theExternalPatientSafetyReview(June2004).TheQuality,
Safety&HealthInformationPortfoliooftheregionisalsoin
theprocessofdeterminingtheuseormodificationofthistool
toproactivelyidentifyhazardsinthesystem.
Moreimportantly,thetwocriticalincidentsservedastriggers
thatbroughtpatientsafetytotheforefrontfortheCHRand
theDCCM.Numerouschangesandinitiativesbasedonthe
recommendationsfromtheinternalandexternalreviewshave
beeninitiatedorareunderwaywithanattempttotransformthe
cultureoftheorganizationtoonewithamuchgreaterawarenessofhazardidentification,incidentandnearmissreporting
andpatientsafety.
References
Adachi,W. and A. E. Lodolce. 2005. “Use of Failure Mode and
EffectsAnalysisinImprovingtheSafetyofI.V.DrugAdministration.”
AmericanJournalofHealth-SystemPharmacy62:917–20.
AmericanSocietyforHealthcareRiskManagement.2002.White
paper:StrategiesandTipsforMaximizingFailureModeEffectAnalysis
inYourOrganizationAmericanHospitalAssociation.
CalgaryHealthRegion.2004.ExternalPatientSafetyReview.
CenterforFoodSafetyandAppliedNutrition,AdvisoryCommittee
onMicrobiologicalCriteriaforFoods.1997.HazardAnalysisand
CriticalControlPointPrinciplesandApplicationGuidelines.U.S.Food
andDrugAdministration.U.S.DeptofAgriculture.RetrievedAugust
5,2005.
DeRosier,J.,E.Stalhandske,J.P.BagianandT.Nudell.2002.“Using
HealthCareFailureModeandEffectAnalysisTM:TheVANational
CentreforPatientSafety’sProspectiveRiskAnalysisSystem.”Journal
onQualityImprovement28(5):248–67.
Esmail,R.,A.Kirby,T.InksonandP.J.E.Boiteau.2005.“Quality
ImprovementintheICU.ACanadianPerspective.”JournalofCritical
Care20:74–6.
Gosbee,J.2002.“HumanFactorsEngineeringandPatientSafety.”
QualityandSafetyinHealthcare11:352s–54.
InstituteforSafeMedicationPracticesCanada.2004.ISMPCanada
SafetyBulletin4(3):1–2.
Langley,J.G.,K.M.Nolan,T.W.Nolan,C.L.Norman,L.P.Provost.
1996.TheImprovementGuide:APracticalApproachtoEnhancing
OrganizationalPerformance.NewYork(NY):Jossey-Bass.
McNally,M.K.,M.A.PageandV.B.Sunderland.1997.“FailuremodeandeffectsAnalysisinImprovingaDrugDistributionSystem.”
AmericanJournalHealth-SystemPharmacy54:171–7.
Reiling,G.J,B.L.KnutzenandM.Stoecklein.2003.FMEA–the
CureforMedicalErrors.QualityProgress36(8):67–71.
Rozich,DJ.,C.R.Haradon,R.K.Resar.2003.“AdverseDrugEvent
TriggerTool:APracticalMethodologyforMeasuringMedication
RelatedHarm.”QualityandSafetyinHealthcare12:194–200.
78 | H E A LT H CA R E Q U A R T E R LY V O L . 8 , S P E C I A L I S S U E • O C T O B E R 2 0 0 5
Rosmin Esmail et al. UsingHealthcareFailureModeandEffectAnalysisTool
Wickens,D.C.,J.D.Lee,Y.Liu,S.E.G.Becker.2004.AnIntroduction
toHumanFactorsEngineering.UpperSaddleRiver,NewJersey:Pearson
PrenticeHall.
Dr.TerranceHulme, MD, FRCPC, is an intensivist at the Rockyview
Hospital, CHR
Corresponding Author: Rosmin Esmail, Email: rosmin.esmail@
calgaryhealthregion.ca
About the Authors
RosminEsmail, MSc, is the Quality Improvement and Patient
Safety Consultant for the DCCM, CHR.
CherylCummings, RN, is an ICU nurse at the Peter Lougheed
Hospital, CHR
DeonneDersch, RPh, is a pharmacist at the Foothills Medical
Center, CHR
Acknowledgment
*Special thanks to the contribution of the other members of
the Patient Safety and Adverse Events Team. They are Dr. Paul
Boiteau, Colin Dececco, Judy Duffett-Martin, Alyce Kolody, Bobbi
Sheppy, Arkadi Shuman, Teresa Thurber, Doug Vanstaalduine,
and Peter Wiesner.
Greg Duchscherer, RRT, is a clinical development specialist,
CHR
JudyGlowa, RN, BN, is an ICU Clinical Nurse Educator at the
Foothills Medical Center, CHR
GailLiggett, RN, BN, is an ICU/CCU Clinical Nurse Educator at
the Peter Lougheed Hospital, CHR
AppendixI:Recommendations
General/ICU
1. Usepremixedsolutionsforhigh-riskdrugsasmuchas
possible.
(a)Pharmacypremixesthehigh-riskmedications.
(b)Unusualornonstandarddosesnotbemixedor
administered,further,minimizingtheneedtomix
potassiumsolutions.
General/ICU
2. Education,tore-emphasizethe5(7)RIGHTSofdrug
administration:Rightpatient,rightdrug,rightdose,right
route,andrighttime,and,
Rightreasonandrightdocumentation.
(a)Encourageacultureofdouble-checkingoforderswith
physicians,whenhigh-riskdrugsareordered.
(b)Promotetheidentificationofhigh-riskdrugs.
General
3. Concentratedpotassiumsolutions(high-concentrated
vials)areremovedfromwardstockandthenightpharmacy.
(a)Sodiumphosphateissubstitutedforpotassium
phosphate.
(b)Monobasicpotassiumphosphatesolution,when
needed,istheonlysolutionused.
ICU
(c)WithrespecttoCRRT,concentratedsolutionsare
CRRT-specificorpatient-specificmedications.Onlya
smallsupply(4–6vials)isavailable,afterpharmacy
hasclosed,forCRRTuseonly.
ICU
4a.Betteridentificationandstorageofthevariousminibags,
withlargecolour-codedlabelsused.
(i) Storageandmedicationareasarereorganizedto
separatebins,makethemmoredistinctandplacedat
anappropriateandsafeworkinglevel.
(ii)Thebinsfortherespectivepotassiumconcentrations
arecolourcoded(i.e.,withauxiliaryfluorescent
labels).
(iii)Minibagsbelabelledanddistributedfrompharmacy.
(iv)Pharmacyparticipatesinthisreorganizationandtakes
ownershipofthelong-termorganizationofmedication
areas.
(v)Haveamagnifyingglassavailableinallmedication
areas.
ICU
4b.Reducetherangeofpremixedpotassiumsolutions
available.
(i)Restrictaccessanduseof40-mmolKCLminibagsto
onlyICUpatients,whosepotassiumisbeingreplaced,
perICUpotassiumprotocol.Providedthatrecommendation4aisimplemented.
(ii)Usemultiplesofpremixedbagsforpatientswhose
potassiumisnotbeingreplacedperprotocol.
(iii)Goalshouldbetostandardizetheorderingof
potassiumwithuniversaldosesorprotocol,
concentrationsandsetinfusionrates.
continued
H E A LT H CA R E Q U A R T E R LY V O L . 8 , S P E C I A L I S S U E • O C T O B E R 2 0 0 5 | 79
UsingHealthcareFailureModeandEffectAnalysisTool Rosmin Esmail et al.
continued
General/ICU
4c.Ifpossible,useoralpotassiumsupplementsinlieuofintravenoussolutions.
ICU
5a.IntheFMCsite,the“A”medicationareaismovedaway
fromtheunitclerk’sdesk.AttheRGHsite,medication
areamovedorrenovatedtodecreasenoiseanddistractions.
General/ICU
5b.Educateandencourageadonotdisturbpolicywhenmedicationsarebeingmixed.
General/ICU
6. Look-alikeandsound-alikedrugsarehighlightedbetter.
(a)Usethesamewarninglabels,consistently,throughout
theregion.
(b)“Medicationalert”labelsbereplacedwithmore
specificlabelsstatingeitherlook-alike,sound-alike,
differentdosesorroutes.
ICU
7. Whenbolusesofpotassiumarebeinggiventheordersand
medicationbedouble-checkedandchartedinQS.This
shouldincludepatientsreceivingbolusesof40mmolsor
greaterorwhentheICUKprotocolisused.
General/ICU
8a.WhenmedicationsaremixedintheICUorontheward,
properlabellingistoincludepatientname,drug,concentration,date/timeandwhomixedthemedication.
ICU
8b.Astandardizedprotocolisdevelopedandimplementedfor
theadministrationandmonitoringofpotassiumreplacementinseverelifethreateninghypokalemia.
General/ICU
9a.Clearandsimpleinstructionsformixingasolutionare
includedintheregion’sintravenoustherapymanual.
(i) Goalistominimizecalculationsanderrors.
(ii) Considerationisgiventouseofcalculationgridsinthe
instructionmanuals.
(iii) Revisethepharmacyinformationsectiononthe
internalICUwebsite,makinginformationmoreeasily
available.
General
10.Considerusingsatellitepharmaciesinareaswherehighriskdrugsareused.
ICU
9b.Usea“keypadbox”forthenarcoticskeyattheFMCsite.
(CurrentlyusedatthePLCandRGH.)
General
11.ImmediatechangestotheTDSordersetsaremade.
(a)Reducetheoptions;i.e.,solutions,concentrations,
volumesandratesavailablefororderingpotassium.
(b)Promotetheculturalchangesnecessarytoreducethe
useofverbalordersforallhigh-riskdrugs.General/
ICU
(c)Introducebarrierswhenorderingpotassiumto
preventduplicatedormultiplepotassiumordersforan
individualpatient.
(d)ImplementKCLprotocolswithappropriateinclusion
andexclusioncriteria,timelimitsortermination
pointsaredevelopedfornon-ICUpatients.Includein
theprotocollinkstoserumcreatinineandprevious
potassiumdoses(similartocurrentCoumadinorder
setsinTDS).
(e)Tablesshowingestimatedpotassiumdeficitsandrate
ofreplacementareincludedintheprotocols.
Research. Evidence. Dissemination.
www.healthcarepolicy.net
80 | H E A LT H CA R E Q U A R T E R LY V O L . 8 , S P E C I A L I S S U E • O C T O B E R 2 0 0 5
Using Healthcare Failure Mode
and Effect Analysis Tool to Review
the Process of Ordering and
Administrating Potassium Chloride
and Potassium Phosphate
RosminEsmail,CherylCummings,DeonneDersch,GregDuchscherer,JudyGlowa,GailLiggett,
TerranceHulmeandthePatientSafetyandAdverseEventsTeam*
CalgaryHealthRegion,Calgary,Alberta,Canada
Abstract
During the spring of 2004, in the Calgary Health Region (CHR)
two critical incidents occurred involving patients receiving
continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) in the intensive
care unit (ICU). The outcome of these events resulted in the
sudden death of both patients.
The Department of Critical Care Medicine’s Patient Safety
and Adverse Events Team (PSAT), utilized the Healthcare Failure
Mode and Effect Analysis (HFMEA) tool to review the process
and conditions surrounding the ordering and administration of
potassium chloride (KCl) and potassium phosphate (KPO4) in
our ICUs.
The HFMEA tool and the multidisciplinary team structure
provided a solid framework for systematic analysis and prioritization of areas for improvement regarding the use of intravenous,
high-concentration KCL and KPO4 in the ICU.
INTRODUCTION
“An83-year-oldwomanwhowasapatientinthecardiovascularcareunitattheFoothillsMedicalCenter(FMC)
site of the CHR died suddenly in the presence of her
physicianandmembersofherfamily.Shewasalertand
orientedatthetimeandhercondition,whileveryserious,
didnotseemtoindicatereasonsforimmediateconcern.
Herunexpecteddeathwasdevastatingforherfamilyand
extremelydistressingforallthoseinvolvedinhercare.An
ICUphysiciansuspectedthecause—thecompositionof
dialysatesolutionbeingusedtotreatherkidneyfailure.
Thiswasquicklyconfirmedand30bagsofthesolution
madeinthesamebatchwereremovedfrompatientcare
areas,undoubtedlypreventingthedeathsofotherpatients.
Ananalysisoftheotherbagsfromthatbatchaswellas
asystematicreviewofpatientrecordsidentifiedasecond
patientwhosedeath,oneweekearlier,waslikelycausedby
thesamesetofcircumstances.Thiswasnotsuspectedatthe
timeofdeathduetothepatient’sseriouscondition.”
For the Calgary Health Region (CHR), patient safety was
broughttotheforefrontinthespringof2004,whentherewere
twocriticalincidentsthatresultedinthedeathoftwopatients
Upon further investigation, it was determined that in
receivingCRRTintwodifferentICUsoftheCHR(ISMPalert February2004,pharmacytechniciansinthecentralproduction
March25,2004).Hereisabriefdescriptionoftheincidents facilityoftheCHRpharmacydepartmentpreparedadialysate
fromtheExternalPatientSafetyReview(June2004):
solutionforpatientsreceivingCRRT.Duringtheprocess,KCL
H E A LT H CA R E Q U A R T E R LY V O L . 8 , S P E C I A L I S S U E • O C T O B E R 2 0 0 5
| 73
UsingHealthcareFailureModeandEffectAnalysisTool Rosmin Esmail et al.
wasinadvertentlyaddedtothedialysatebagsinsteadofsodium
chloride(NaCl)solution.Itisbelievedthattheseincorrectly
preparedsolutionswereusedinthedialysisofthetwopatients
whodied(ExternalPatientSafetyReview,CHRJune2004).
The CHR publicly disclosed the facts and initiated an
externalpatientsafetyreview.TheDepartmentofCriticalCare
Medicine(DCCM)alsoundertookareviewoftheprocessfor
orderingandadministeringintravenous,high-concentration
KClandKPO4,usingtheHFMEAtooldevelopedbyDeRosier,
Josephetal.(2002).Thefocusofthisarticleistodescribethe
applicationofthetoolwithrespecttoreviewingtheprocesses
involved in ordering and administering intravenous, highconcentrationKClandKPO4,therebyallowingtheDCCM
toproactivelyidentifyhazardsthatmayexistandestablisha
saferprocess.
BACKGROUND
toolforriskassessmentinthehealthcarefield.TheHFMEA
toolwasformedbycombiningindustry’sFMEAmodelwith
theU.S.FoodandDrugAdministration’sHazardAnalysisand
CriticalControlPoint(HACCP)tooltogetherwithcomponentsfromtheVA’srootcauseanalysis(RCA)process.HACCP
wasdevelopedtoprotectfoodfromchemicalandbiological
contamination and physical hazards.The HACCP system
usessevensteps:(1)conductahazardanalysis,(2)identify
criticalcontrolpoints,(3)establishcriticallimits,(4)establishmonitoringprocedures,(5)establishcorrectiveactions,
(6)establishverificationprocedures,and(7)establishrecordkeepinganddocumentationprocedures(CenterforFoodSafety
andAppliedNutrition,1997).Itusesquestionstoprobefor
foodsystemvulnerabilitiesaswellasadecisiontreetoidentify
criticalcontrolpoints.Thedecisiontreeconceptwasadapted
bytheVAfortheHFMEAtool.
TheHFMEAtoolhasbeensubsequentlyrecognizedinthe
WhitePaperpreparedbytheAmericanSocietyforHealthcare
RiskManagement(ASHRM).Inanefforttogloballysharethe
meritsofthisprocess,avideo,instructionalCDandworksheets
ontheuseandapplicationofHFMEAhasbeensenttoevery
hospitalCEOintheUStobesharedwithindividualsandrisk
managersresponsibleforpatientsafety(AmericanSocietyfor
HealthRiskManagement2002).
TheDCCMhasbeenengagedinongoingqualityimprovementandpatientsafetyinitiativesbothformallyandinformallyforover10years(Esmailetal.2005).Atpresent,the
regionincludesthreeadultacutecareteachinghospitalsand
onepediatrichospital:FoothillsMedicalCentre(FMC),Peter
LougheedCenter(PLC),RockyviewGeneralHospital(RGH)
andtheAlbertaChildren’sHospital.TheDepartmentofCritical
CareMedicineoverseesfouradultintensivecareunits:
•A24-bedMultisystemICU(FMC)
HFMEA TOOL
•A14-bedCardiovascularICU(FMC)
TherearefivestepsintheHFMEAtool.Steponeistodefine
•A12-bedMultisystemICUs(PLC)
thetopic;steptwoistoassembletheteam;stepthreerequires
•A10-bedMultisystemICUs(RGH)
thedevelopmentofaprocessmapforthetopicandconsecutivelynumberingeachstepandsubstepsofthatprocess;step
HFMEA VS FAILURE MODE AND EFFECT
fouristoconductthehazardanalysis.Thisstepinvolvesfour
ANALYSIS (FMEA)
processes:theidentificationoffailuremodes,identificationof
Inthepast,medicineusedahumanerrorapproachwhich thecausesofthesefailuremodes,scoringeachfailuremode
identifiedtheindividualasthecauseoftheadverseevent. usingtheHazardScoringMatrix,andworkingthroughthe
Wenowrecognizethaterrorsarecausedbysystemorprocess DecisionTreeAnalysis.Thefinalstepistodevelopactionsand
failures(McNallyetal.1997).FMEAwasdevelopedforuse outcomes.ThenextsectionwilldescribehowtheDCCM’s
bytheUnitedStatesmilitaryandisutilizedbytheNational PatientSafetyandAdverseEventsteam(PSAT)workedthrough
AeronauticsandSpaceAdministration(NASA),topredict eachstepoftheHFMEAtooltoreviewtheprocessofordering
and evaluate potential failures and unrecognized hazards processoforderingintravenous,high-concentrationKCland
andtoproactivelyidentifystepsinaprocessthatcouldhelp KPO4.
reduceoreliminateafailurefromoccurring(Reilingetal.
2003).FMEAfocusesonthesystemwithinanenvironment HFMEA — Step One
andusesamultidisciplinaryteamtoevaluateaprocessfroma SteponeistodefinetheHFMEAtopic.Thetopicisusuallya
qualityimprovementperspective.TheJointCommissionfor processthathashighvulnerabilitiesandpotentialforimpacting
AccreditationofHealthcareOrganizations(JCAHO)inthe patientsafety.ItisimportantinaHFMEAanalysistodefine
UShasrecommendedthathealthcareinstitutionsconduct boundariesandlimitthescopeofthetopicbeingreviewed.
proactiveriskmanagementactivitiesthatidentifyandpredict
Followingthetwopreviouslymentionedcriticalincidents,
systemweaknessesandadoptchangestominimizepatientharm tworeviewswereconductedintheCHR.Thefirstwasan
(Adachietal.2001).
internalreviewandwasconductedbythePatientSafetyTask
In2001theVeteran’sAdministration(VA)NationalCentre Force,andthesecondwasconsideredexternalandperformed
forPatientSafety(NCPS)specificallydesignedtheHFMEA bytheExternalPatientSafetyReviewCommittee(June2004).
74 | H E A LT H CA R E Q U A R T E R LY V O L . 8 , S P E C I A L I S S U E • O C T O B E R 2 0 0 5
Rosmin Esmail et al. UsingHealthcareFailureModeandEffectAnalysisTool
Duringthesametime,inresponsetothetragiceventsfrom
March2004,disparateandpoorlycoordinatedchangesinpolicy
regardingthestorageanduseofhighlyconcentratedpotassium
wereinitiatedwithintheregionalICUs.Thedepartment’sICU
executivecouncildeterminedtheneedtoundertakeareview
oftheprocessforthegeneralhandlingofintravenous,highconcentrationKClandKPO4 priortoreviewingtheprocess
ofpreparingCRRTbagsfordialysis.Itwasunderstoodthat
someofthestepsinthisprocesswouldoverlapwiththeCRRT
process.
HFMEA — Step Two
SteptwointheHFMEAtoolistoassembleateam.Theteam
shouldincludesixtoeightmultidisciplinarymemberswhoare
involvedintheprocessbeinganalyzedandaretosomedegree
considered“subjectmatter”experts.
Thedepartment’sPSATwasassignedthistask.Theteamwas
co-ledbyanintensivistandthedepartment’squalityimprovementandpatientsafetyconsultant.Theteamwasmultidisciplinary,withtwointensivists,threerespiratorytherapists,two
nursingeducators,twofrontlinenursingstafffromeachhospital
siteandtwopharmacists.Theteamhadbeenpreviouslyworking
onchartreviewsofadverseeventsusingtheIHItriggertool
methodology(Rozichetal.2003)andstaffeducationwith
respecttoincidentsandincidentreporting.Theteammetevery
otherweekoveratwo-monthperiod(AprilandMay2004).
HFMEA — Step Three
StepthreeoftheHFMEAtoolrequiresthedevelopmentofa
processmapforthetopicandconsecutivelynumberingeach
stepandsubstepsofthatprocess.Iftheprocessistoocomplex,
aspecificareawithintheoverallprocesscanbefocusedupon.
Theteamidentified11stepsintheprocessoforderingand
administeringKClandKPO4(Figure1).Afterreviewingthese
11steps,theteamfocusedontwocriticalsteps:obtainingthe
drug(step#6)andmixingthedrug(step#7)andthenidentified
thesubstepsforeachofthesetwoHFMEAsteps(Figure2).Site
visitstoreviewwhereKCLandKPO4werestoredandconversationswithfrontlinestaffintheunitstoverifytheprocesswere
alsoconducted.
Figure1:ProcessforOrderingPotassiumChloride/PotassiumPhosphateattheFoothills
MedicalCentre
STEP 1
Pre-order lab
through
OPSCAR/TDS
STEP 2
Order ordered by
residents or
attending; or
residents/attending
may tell nurse to
order in TDS
STEP 3
Print out order –
2 copies (1 copy in
unit, 1 copy in
pharmacy)
STEP 4
Unit Clerk takes
order to beside
STEP 5
Unit clerk gets
attention of nurse
re; order but this
does not always
occur
STEP 6
Nurse gets drug
from narcotic
cupboard
6A. Pharmacy assistant stocks
narcotic cupboard.
6B. Nurse gets the key.
6C. Nurse goes to narcotic
cupboard in desk A.
6D. Opens narcotic cupboard.
6E. Gets KCI or KPO4
6F. Locks cupboard.
*Sign for KCI
*If any discard then co-sign.
6G. Nurse puts key back.
STEP 11
Patient monitoring
of drug
STEP 10
Patient gets drug
STEP 9
Nurse administers
the drug
STEP 8
Nurse brings drug to
bedside or can be
another RN
STEP 7
Nurse mixes and
labels drug if
potassium
phosphate. Another
RN can mix if busy
DAY- pharmacy
mixes Kphosphate
NIGHT- (22000700)- Nurse mixes
7A. Nurse takes KPO4
7B. Need to do calculations
(rate and volume).
7C. Mix and label drug.
H E A LT H CA R E Q U A R T E R LY V O L . 8 , S P E C I A L I S S U E • O C T O B E R 2 0 0 5 | 75
DAY- pharmacy
mixes Kphosphate
NIGHT- (22000700)- Nurse mixes
7A. Nurse takes KPO4
7B. Need to do calculations
(rate and volume).
7C. Mix and label drug.
UsingHealthcareFailureModeandEffectAnalysisTool Rosmin Esmail et al.
Figure2:FailureModesforStep6and7
Step#6:NursegetsDrugfromNarcoticsCupboard
6A
Pharmacy Assistant
stocks narcotic
cupboard
Failure Mode:
1. Stocking Error.
6B
Nurse gets the key
6C
Nurse goes to
narcotic cupboard in
Desk A
6D
Opens narcotic
cupboard
Failure Mode:
1. Key not there.
6E
Gets KCI or KPO4
Failure Mode:
1. Picks the wrong
drug
6F
Locks cupboard
* Sign for KCL
*If any discard then
co-sign
6G
Nurse puts key back
Failure Mode:
1. Leave discard
on counter
This Failure Mode is
illustrated on the
worksheet
Step#7:NurseMixesandLabelsDrugifPotassiumPhosphate
7A
Nurse takes KPO4
7B
Need to do
calculations (rate
and volume)
7C
Mix and label drug
Failure Mode:
1. Nurse takes
wrong drug.
Failure Mode:
1. No worksheet/
reference to do
calculations.
Failure Mode:
1. Incorrect mixing.
2. No routine double checking
of mixing
3. Inaccurate (not reliable) label.
4. Stab bag by accident.
5. Forget to sign or co-sign
waste.
6. Put solution in wrong bag.
7. Not throwing out waste.
HFMEA —Step Four
InstepfouroftheHFMEAtool,theareaoffocusisfurther
narrowedusingthefollowingfourprocesses:identificationof
failuremodes,identificationofthecausesofthesefailuremodes,
scoringeachfailuremodeusingtheHazardScoringMatrix,
andworkingthroughtheDecisionTreeAnalysis(DeRosieret
al.2002).Theteamidentifiedthefailuremodesforsteps#6
and#7(Figure2).Thefailuremodesthatreceivedthehighest
hazardsscoreswere:nurseselectingthewrongdrug,distractions
whenmixingandinaccurate,orincompletelabels.Usingthe
HFMEAdecisiontreeanalysis,theteamworkedthrougheach
hazardtodetermineifitneededfurtheraction.
This Failure
Mode is
illustrated on
the worksheet
orcontributingfactorsandneedtobespecificandconcrete.
Frontlinestaffinvolveddirectlyintheprocessneedtoreview
them.Actionscanthenbetestedpriortoimplementationusing
theImprovementModelmethodologythatincludestesting
changesusingthePlan-Do-Study-Act(PDSA)cycle(Langley
etal.1996).Outcomesmustbemeasurable,withadefined
samplingstrategy,settimeframeformeasurementandwitha
realisticwell-articulatedgoal.
Eleven recommendations were developed based on this
analysis(AppendixI).Theserecommendationswereplaced
intotwocategories,generalandICU-specific,andsubsequently
presentedtotheICUexecutivecouncilinJuly2004.These
recommendationsaddressedhowKClandKPO4aretobe
HFMEA — Step Five
storedandwho,where,andhowthedrugsaretobemixed.
InstepfiveoftheHFMEAtool,actionsaredeveloped.Actions Theserecommendationsalsofocusedontheidentificationof
toaddresstheidentifiedhazardsneedtofocusonrootcauses look-alikeandsound-alikeproductsbasedonhumanfactor
76 | H E A LT H CA R E Q U A R T E R LY V O L . 8 , S P E C I A L I S S U E • O C T O B E R 2 0 0 5
Rosmin Esmail et al. UsingHealthcareFailureModeandEffectAnalysisTool
principles(Gosbeeetal.2002andWickensetal.2004).Key
recommendationsweresummarizedintoanactionplanwith
delegated responsibility and timelines for implementation
(Figure3).
Implementation of the recommendations has proven to
bemoredifficultthantheHFMEAprocessitself.Oncethe
recommendationswerepresentedandapprovedatICUexecutivecouncil,thosethatwerekeyICU-specificrecommendationswereprimarilydelegatedtopharmacy,unitpatientcare
managers(PCMs)andunitdirectorsandPSATforimplementationwithspecifiedtimelines.Forexample,forrecommendation
#2,a“safetysnippet”onthesevenrightsofdrugadministration
wasdevelopedbyaPSATmemberandpostedontheinternal
DCCMwebsitetoeducatestaff.Recommendationsthathada
broaderregionalimpactweresharedwiththeregion’sworking
grouponhigh-riskmedicationswhoweredevelopingaregional
policyonKCl.Theregionisalsointheprocessofdeveloping
standardlabelsforlook-alikeandsound-alikedrugs.
ofthenumerousstepsinvolvedinadministratingthismedicationanditbecameobviousthatthereweremanyopportunities
forerrorstooccur.HFMEAenabledtheteamtoprioritizethe
criticalitemsofacomplexprocessandtookthesubjectivityout
oftheanalysis.
ThemultidisciplinarystructureofPSATallowedmembersto
identifyeachstepfromtheirownprofessionalpracticeperspective.ThePSATcompositionalsogenerateddiverseideaswhen
brainstormingactionsandallowedforgooddiscussionand
deliberation,whichultimatelypromotedteambuilding.
HFMEAwasaneasytooltousebyallmembersoftheteam.
Itmadetheapproachtoaverycomplicatedprocessrelatively
straightforward.UsingtheHFMEAtool,thetwoleaderswere
abletofocustheteamonthespecificcomponentsofthetool.
Thetoolenabledtheteamtodevelopastructuredoutlineofthe
goalsthatneededtobeaccomplishedateachmeeting.Theteam
hasalsousedthistooltoanalyzethehazardsoftheprocessfor
preparingCRRTbagsfordialysispatientsintheICU.
AlthoughtheworkofthePSATwasextremelyvaluable
DISCUSSION
forthedepartment,itwasalsotimeconsuming.Itwouldbe
TE AM LE SSONS LE ARNE D
appropriatetoconductaHFMEAanalysisononeortwohighHFMEAwaswellrecognizedbythePSATanditprovided prioritytopicsperyearashasbeenrecommendedbytheJoint
asolidframeworkforthestep-by-stepanalysisofpotassium CommissiononAccreditationofHealthCareOrganizationsin
orderingandadministration.Theteammemberswereunaware theUnitedStates(Adachietal.2001).
Figure3:WorksheetforFailureModels6E1and7C3
Follow-upDate
December,2005
December2005
#ofinaccuratelabels
beingfilledinbystaff
Pharmacy,PCMs,unit Person/
directors,PSATteam Responsible
•numberofstaff
educatedon7rights
•Sodiumphosphate
substitutedforpotassiumphosphate
•Improvedlabelingof
lookalikeandsound
alikedrugs
PCMsandunit
directors
Recommendation8a Recommendations#2, Action
inAppendix1
#3,#6
inAppendix1
Yes
Proceed?
OutcomeMeasure
Yes
ExistingControl
Measure?
No
Major
Major
No
Distractions,doctor
callsnurse,time
constraints
SinglePoint
Weakness?
7C3
HazardScore
Inaccurate
label(not
reliable)
12
Nurseinahurry,
frustratedlookingfor
key,chaseafterresidentforverbalorder
andputinwrongbox,
inconsistentlabel
frompharmacy(look-
alikedrug)
HPMEA–IdentifyActionsandOutcomes
9
6E1
Frequent
Picksthe
wrongdrug
Occasional
PotentialCauses
Severity
FailureMode:
Probability
HFMEAStep4–HazardAnalysis
H E A LT H CA R E Q U A R T E R LY V O L . 8 , S P E C I A L I S S U E • O C T O B E R 2 0 0 5 | 77
UsingHealthcareFailureModeandEffectAnalysisTool Rosmin Esmail et al.
Pharmacy Lessons Learned
Thedialysatemanufacturingerrorcameasaharshreminder
totheCHR’spharmacydepartmentofitsneedforstructured
policiesandproceduresforerroravoidance.Thiserroroccurred
despiteexistingsafetyproceduresthatincludingfourdouble
checksbypharmacists.Therisksassociatedwithintravenous
potassiumcametotheforefrontofthepharmacydepartment’s
focusandtherewasaheightenedawarenessofpharmacy’srole
inpatientsafety.
Since 2002, intravenous high concentration KCL vials
have not been available in most patient care areas in the
CHR.PremixedKCLbagsareavailableandanyspecialbags
notcommerciallyavailablearetobemixedinthepharmacy
department.ThesepoliciesarebasedontheISMPCanada
recommendations (2002) and also reiterated in the PSAT
recommendations.Priortotheincidents,intravenouspotassium
vialswereavailableinthenightdispensaryforusewhilethe
pharmacywasclosed;thesehavenowbeenreplacedbypremixed
bags.Theonlyvialsofintravenouspotassiumavailableoutside
thepharmacydepartmentincludeasmallsupplyofKClvials
keptinnarcoticcupboardsofcriticalcareanddialysisunits.
ThesevialsaretobeusedforspecialCRRTsolutionsonly.
Beforethedialysatemanufacturingerroroccurred,intravenouspotassiumvialswerestoredontheregulardrugshelves
withinthepharmacydepartment.Sincetheerror,allintravenouspotassiumvialsarestoredinaseparate,lockedarea
within the pharmacy. All intravenous potassium vials and
minibagsarenowlabelledwithawarningstickertofurther
distinguish them, as per the recommendation from ISMP
Canada(ISMPalert2002).
Additionally,drugidentificationnumbershavebeenadded
tothemanufacturingworksheetsusedbypharmacytechniciansinthesterileproductpreparationarea.Thisaddsredundancythroughcheckingoftheprocedureforsterileproducts,
includingdialysate.Batchesofdialysatearenowquarantined
untilpotassiumlevelsineachbatchareconfirmedtobezeroby
laboratorytesting.
By changing preparation, manufacturing, labelling and
storageproceduresforintravenouspotassiumproducts,therisk
oferrorhasbeensubstantiallyreduced.
CONCLUSION
ThisarticledescribedtheuseoftheHFMEAtooldevelopedby
theVAanditsapplicationintheprocessoforderingandadministrating intravenous high-concentration KCL and KPO4.
Elevenrecommendationsresultedfromthisanalysis.TheICUspecificrecommendationsthatdidnotincurcostswereimplementedexpeditiously.Generalrecommendations,whichwere
notunderthepurviewoftheDCCM,weresharedwithCHR’s
RegionalPatientSafetyCommittee,whichhassincedeveloped
aregionalpolicyonKCl.
Inadditiontothiswork,theknowledgeandunderstanding
gainedfromtheapplicationoftheHFMEAtoolbyDCCM’s
PSATwillbesharedwiththeRegionalPatientSafetyTransport
workinggroupreviewingpatienttransportbetweenhospitals.
Thisgrouphasbeenformedbasedonrecommendationsfrom
theExternalPatientSafetyReview(June2004).TheQuality,
Safety&HealthInformationPortfoliooftheregionisalsoin
theprocessofdeterminingtheuseormodificationofthistool
toproactivelyidentifyhazardsinthesystem.
Moreimportantly,thetwocriticalincidentsservedastriggers
thatbroughtpatientsafetytotheforefrontfortheCHRand
theDCCM.Numerouschangesandinitiativesbasedonthe
recommendationsfromtheinternalandexternalreviewshave
beeninitiatedorareunderwaywithanattempttotransformthe
cultureoftheorganizationtoonewithamuchgreaterawarenessofhazardidentification,incidentandnearmissreporting
andpatientsafety.
References
Adachi,W. and A. E. Lodolce. 2005. “Use of Failure Mode and
EffectsAnalysisinImprovingtheSafetyofI.V.DrugAdministration.”
AmericanJournalofHealth-SystemPharmacy62:917–20.
AmericanSocietyforHealthcareRiskManagement.2002.White
paper:StrategiesandTipsforMaximizingFailureModeEffectAnalysis
inYourOrganizationAmericanHospitalAssociation.
CalgaryHealthRegion.2004.ExternalPatientSafetyReview.
CenterforFoodSafetyandAppliedNutrition,AdvisoryCommittee
onMicrobiologicalCriteriaforFoods.1997.HazardAnalysisand
CriticalControlPointPrinciplesandApplicationGuidelines.U.S.Food
andDrugAdministration.U.S.DeptofAgriculture.RetrievedAugust
5,2005.
DeRosier,J.,E.Stalhandske,J.P.BagianandT.Nudell.2002.“Using
HealthCareFailureModeandEffectAnalysisTM:TheVANational
CentreforPatientSafety’sProspectiveRiskAnalysisSystem.”Journal
onQualityImprovement28(5):248–67.
Esmail,R.,A.Kirby,T.InksonandP.J.E.Boiteau.2005.“Quality
ImprovementintheICU.ACanadianPerspective.”JournalofCritical
Care20:74–6.
Gosbee,J.2002.“HumanFactorsEngineeringandPatientSafety.”
QualityandSafetyinHealthcare11:352s–54.
InstituteforSafeMedicationPracticesCanada.2004.ISMPCanada
SafetyBulletin4(3):1–2.
Langley,J.G.,K.M.Nolan,T.W.Nolan,C.L.Norman,L.P.Provost.
1996.TheImprovementGuide:APracticalApproachtoEnhancing
OrganizationalPerformance.NewYork(NY):Jossey-Bass.
McNally,M.K.,M.A.PageandV.B.Sunderland.1997.“FailuremodeandeffectsAnalysisinImprovingaDrugDistributionSystem.”
AmericanJournalHealth-SystemPharmacy54:171–7.
Reiling,G.J,B.L.KnutzenandM.Stoecklein.2003.FMEA–the
CureforMedicalErrors.QualityProgress36(8):67–71.
Rozich,DJ.,C.R.Haradon,R.K.Resar.2003.“AdverseDrugEvent
TriggerTool:APracticalMethodologyforMeasuringMedication
RelatedHarm.”QualityandSafetyinHealthcare12:194–200.
78 | H E A LT H CA R E Q U A R T E R LY V O L . 8 , S P E C I A L I S S U E • O C T O B E R 2 0 0 5
Rosmin Esmail et al. UsingHealthcareFailureModeandEffectAnalysisTool
Wickens,D.C.,J.D.Lee,Y.Liu,S.E.G.Becker.2004.AnIntroduction
toHumanFactorsEngineering.UpperSaddleRiver,NewJersey:Pearson
PrenticeHall.
Dr.TerranceHulme, MD, FRCPC, is an intensivist at the Rockyview
Hospital, CHR
Corresponding Author: Rosmin Esmail, Email: rosmin.esmail@
calgaryhealthregion.ca
About the Authors
RosminEsmail, MSc, is the Quality Improvement and Patient
Safety Consultant for the DCCM, CHR.
CherylCummings, RN, is an ICU nurse at the Peter Lougheed
Hospital, CHR
DeonneDersch, RPh, is a pharmacist at the Foothills Medical
Center, CHR
Acknowledgment
*Special thanks to the contribution of the other members of
the Patient Safety and Adverse Events Team. They are Dr. Paul
Boiteau, Colin Dececco, Judy Duffett-Martin, Alyce Kolody, Bobbi
Sheppy, Arkadi Shuman, Teresa Thurber, Doug Vanstaalduine,
and Peter Wiesner.
Greg Duchscherer, RRT, is a clinical development specialist,
CHR
JudyGlowa, RN, BN, is an ICU Clinical Nurse Educator at the
Foothills Medical Center, CHR
GailLiggett, RN, BN, is an ICU/CCU Clinical Nurse Educator at
the Peter Lougheed Hospital, CHR
AppendixI:Recommendations
General/ICU
1. Usepremixedsolutionsforhigh-riskdrugsasmuchas
possible.
(a)Pharmacypremixesthehigh-riskmedications.
(b)Unusualornonstandarddosesnotbemixedor
administered,further,minimizingtheneedtomix
potassiumsolutions.
General/ICU
2. Education,tore-emphasizethe5(7)RIGHTSofdrug
administration:Rightpatient,rightdrug,rightdose,right
route,andrighttime,and,
Rightreasonandrightdocumentation.
(a)Encourageacultureofdouble-checkingoforderswith
physicians,whenhigh-riskdrugsareordered.
(b)Promotetheidentificationofhigh-riskdrugs.
General
3. Concentratedpotassiumsolutions(high-concentrated
vials)areremovedfromwardstockandthenightpharmacy.
(a)Sodiumphosphateissubstitutedforpotassium
phosphate.
(b)Monobasicpotassiumphosphatesolution,when
needed,istheonlysolutionused.
ICU
(c)WithrespecttoCRRT,concentratedsolutionsare
CRRT-specificorpatient-specificmedications.Onlya
smallsupply(4–6vials)isavailable,afterpharmacy
hasclosed,forCRRTuseonly.
ICU
4a.Betteridentificationandstorageofthevariousminibags,
withlargecolour-codedlabelsused.
(i) Storageandmedicationareasarereorganizedto
separatebins,makethemmoredistinctandplacedat
anappropriateandsafeworkinglevel.
(ii)Thebinsfortherespectivepotassiumconcentrations
arecolourcoded(i.e.,withauxiliaryfluorescent
labels).
(iii)Minibagsbelabelledanddistributedfrompharmacy.
(iv)Pharmacyparticipatesinthisreorganizationandtakes
ownershipofthelong-termorganizationofmedication
areas.
(v)Haveamagnifyingglassavailableinallmedication
areas.
ICU
4b.Reducetherangeofpremixedpotassiumsolutions
available.
(i)Restrictaccessanduseof40-mmolKCLminibagsto
onlyICUpatients,whosepotassiumisbeingreplaced,
perICUpotassiumprotocol.Providedthatrecommendation4aisimplemented.
(ii)Usemultiplesofpremixedbagsforpatientswhose
potassiumisnotbeingreplacedperprotocol.
(iii)Goalshouldbetostandardizetheorderingof
potassiumwithuniversaldosesorprotocol,
concentrationsandsetinfusionrates.
continued
H E A LT H CA R E Q U A R T E R LY V O L . 8 , S P E C I A L I S S U E • O C T O B E R 2 0 0 5 | 79
UsingHealthcareFailureModeandEffectAnalysisTool Rosmin Esmail et al.
continued
General/ICU
4c.Ifpossible,useoralpotassiumsupplementsinlieuofintravenoussolutions.
ICU
5a.IntheFMCsite,the“A”medicationareaismovedaway
fromtheunitclerk’sdesk.AttheRGHsite,medication
areamovedorrenovatedtodecreasenoiseanddistractions.
General/ICU
5b.Educateandencourageadonotdisturbpolicywhenmedicationsarebeingmixed.
General/ICU
6. Look-alikeandsound-alikedrugsarehighlightedbetter.
(a)Usethesamewarninglabels,consistently,throughout
theregion.
(b)“Medicationalert”labelsbereplacedwithmore
specificlabelsstatingeitherlook-alike,sound-alike,
differentdosesorroutes.
ICU
7. Whenbolusesofpotassiumarebeinggiventheordersand
medicationbedouble-checkedandchartedinQS.This
shouldincludepatientsreceivingbolusesof40mmolsor
greaterorwhentheICUKprotocolisused.
General/ICU
8a.WhenmedicationsaremixedintheICUorontheward,
properlabellingistoincludepatientname,drug,concentration,date/timeandwhomixedthemedication.
ICU
8b.Astandardizedprotocolisdevelopedandimplementedfor
theadministrationandmonitoringofpotassiumreplacementinseverelifethreateninghypokalemia.
General/ICU
9a.Clearandsimpleinstructionsformixingasolutionare
includedintheregion’sintravenoustherapymanual.
(i) Goalistominimizecalculationsanderrors.
(ii) Considerationisgiventouseofcalculationgridsinthe
instructionmanuals.
(iii) Revisethepharmacyinformationsectiononthe
internalICUwebsite,makinginformationmoreeasily
available.
General
10.Considerusingsatellitepharmaciesinareaswherehighriskdrugsareused.
ICU
9b.Usea“keypadbox”forthenarcoticskeyattheFMCsite.
(CurrentlyusedatthePLCandRGH.)
General
11.ImmediatechangestotheTDSordersetsaremade.
(a)Reducetheoptions;i.e.,solutions,concentrations,
volumesandratesavailablefororderingpotassium.
(b)Promotetheculturalchangesnecessarytoreducethe
useofverbalordersforallhigh-riskdrugs.General/
ICU
(c)Introducebarrierswhenorderingpotassiumto
preventduplicatedormultiplepotassiumordersforan
individualpatient.
(d)ImplementKCLprotocolswithappropriateinclusion
andexclusioncriteria,timelimitsortermination
pointsaredevelopedfornon-ICUpatients.Includein
theprotocollinkstoserumcreatinineandprevious
potassiumdoses(similartocurrentCoumadinorder
setsinTDS).
(e)Tablesshowingestimatedpotassiumdeficitsandrate
ofreplacementareincludedintheprotocols.
Research. Evidence. Dissemination.
www.healthcarepolicy.net
80 | H E A LT H CA R E Q U A R T E R LY V O L . 8 , S P E C I A L I S S U E • O C T O B E R 2 0 0 5