ANALYZING OF STUDENTS MISCONCEPTIONS ON SALT HYDROLYSIS CHEMSITRY AT SENIOR HIGH SCHOOLS IN PADANGSIDEMPUAN.

ANALYZING OF STUDENTS’ MISCONCEPTIONS ON
SALT HYDROLYSIS CHEMISTRY AT SENIOR
HIGH SCHOOLS IN PADANGSIDEMPUAN

By:
Yeni Riska Putri
Reg. Number : 409332032
Bilingual Chemistry Education Study Program

A THESIS

Submitted in Fulfillment of the Requirement for the Degree of
Sarjana Pendidikan

JURUSAN KIMIA
FAKULTAS MATEMATIKA DAN ILMU PENGETAHUAN ALAM
UNIVERSITAS NEGERI MEDAN
MEDAN
2014

ANALYZING OF STUDENTS’ MISCONCEPTIONS ON SALT HYDROLYSIS

CHEMSITRY AT SENIOR HIGH SCHOOLS IN PADANGSIDEMPUAN

ABSTRACT
Students’ misconceptions on learning of salt hydrolysis chemistry at senior high
school in Padangsidempuan were investigated in this study. In this study involved 165 of
students in grade 11th from six different schools in Padangsidempuan, namely SMAN 2
Padangsidempuan, SMAS Kesuma Indah Padangsidempuan, SMAN 4 Padangsidempuan,
SMAS Muhammadiyah Padangsidempuan, SMAN 3 Padangsidempuan, and SMAS
Karya Baru Padangsidempuan. Students’ misconceptions were identified by giving a
valid test developed by researcher to students in form of Salt Hydrolysis Chemistry
Misconceptions Test that containing 20 open-ended multiple choices. The data collected
in this study were students’ responses in form of students’ choices from available options,
where in options consist the reasons. The data of students‘ choices and reasons obtained
were processed and converted into students‘ achievement and understanding,
respectively. The data of students’ understanding obtained from students’ responses were
categorized based on the degree of understanding. The data of students’ misconceptions
from five main concepts that investigated in salt hydrolysis chemistry topic including salt
hydrolysis definition concept (26.06%), formation of salt hydrolysis concept (27.07%),
determining the pH of salt hydrolysis concept (23.54%), the relation between Kh with Kw,
Ka, and Kb concepts (29.72%), and salt hydrolysis in daily life concepts (25.76%). From

the five concept in hydrolysis that analyze by Salt Hydrolysis Chemistry Misconceptions
Test know that most of students have misconceptions in the relation between Kh with Kw,
Ka, and Kb concepts and the determining of the pH of salt solution. The study also
revealed three main students‘ problems in understanding salt hydrolysis chemistry
namely fragmentation of students‘ understanding, problems with symbols and
mathematical formula, and problems in generalization. The results of analysis in students‘
misconception could be used as references for chemistry teachers for identifying students‘
misconception in classroom. Considering the importance of students‘ misconception data,
it was recommended to investigate the source of students‘ misconceptions.

ACKNOWLEDMENT
First of all I would like to devote his greatest thankfulness to the Almighty
Allah SWT, He is the Most Gracious and The Most Merciful for His blessing,
guidance, strength, health and His favor which have been given so that I could
finally finish this thesis entitled : Analyzing of Students’ Misconceptions on
Salt Hydrolysis Chemistry at Senior High School in Padangsidempuan.
In this opportunity, I would like to express my gratitude to my thesis
supervisor, Dr. Zainuddin Muchtar, M.Si., for giving me his guidance, support,
and chance in doing this research. I also thank to Prof. Dr. Ramlan Silaban, M.Si.,
Dr. Mahmud, M.Sc., and Dra. Ani Sutiani, M. Si., as my examiners for their

advices, suggestions, guidance, and constructive critics in the process of
completing this thesis.
I also like to say thanks to for Dr. Retno Dwi Suyanti, M. Si. as my
instrument valuators for her times and suggestion in development of my research
instrument, for Prof. Motlan Sirait, M.Sc., Ph.D., as the dean of Mathematics and
Natural Sciences Faculty, Prof. Dr. rer. nat. Binari Manurung, M. Si.,

as

coordinator of Bilingual Program, Drs. Jamalum Purba, M.Si. as the head of
Chemistry Department, and Prof. Drs. Manihar Situmorang, M.Sc., Ph.D. as my
academic supervisor for all their help in completing my study and this thesis. The
work was also made possible through Student Grant from Research Institute, State
University of Medan.
I give special gratitude for my beloved mother, Rosmiati Harahap and
father, (Alm) M. Idris and also for my brothers; Riswandy Syahputra, Doly
Kurniawan, and Wiwin Destree Anggi. No other could replace all of your love for
me.
Many colleagues have also been an integral part of my thesis. Those are
my team in Student Grant for their help in doing this research. To my beloved

friend Mr. A, thank you for everything and your support for me. My other friends
and colleagues, firstly at Bilingual Chemistry Education ‘09 class especially for

my beloved friend Siti Rahma, thank you for sharing everything, Sari, Ika, Lia,
Irna, Fitri and Dayat, and more latterly in Teaching Experience Program in
School, I love them. I also say thanks to my friend in IAIN SU; Especially for
Wilda Lestari Cliquers, you are my great Friend, also addresed to Adit, Omak,
Maya, Iin and other in there. Thanks are also addressed to SMA Negeri 2, SMA
Negeri 4, SMA Negeri 3, SMA S Kesuma Indah, SMA S Muhammadiyah and
SMA S Karya Baru Padangsidempuan that give me time to done my research in
their school, the last for SMA Negeri 2 Kisaran students as placed of my teaching
experience. They are always in my mind. Thank you all.
I have attempted as maximal as I can in doing this thesis. However, in my
humble heart the writer hope construct suggestions and critics from the reader for
the perfection of this thesis. The writer hopes this thesis can be useful and gives
many function to the readers knowledge especially about subject matter which is
researched in this thesis.

Medan, Januari 2014
The Writer,


Yeni Riska Putri
Reg.Number 409332032

CONTENT
LEGALIZATION PAGE

i

BIOGRAPHY

ii

ABSTRACT

iii

ACKNOWLEDMENT

iv


LIST OF CONTENT

vi

TABLE LIST

ix

FIGURE LIST

xii

APPENDIX LIST

xiii

CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION

1


1.1 The Backgroung of Study

1

1.2 The Problem Identifications

4

1.3 Scope of The Research

4

1.4 Problem Statements

4

1.5 Research Objective

5


1.6 Research Significances

5

CHAPTER II LITERATURE STUDY

6

2.1 Concept, Conception and Preconception

6

2.2 Misconception

7

2.3 Classification of Misconception

10


2.4 The Cause of Misconception

12

2.4.1 Students

12

2.4.2 Teacher

13

2.4.3 Textbook

14

2.4.4 Teaching Methods

14


2.4.5 Context

15

2.5 The Concept of Salt Hydrolysis
2.5.1 Formation of Salt Hydrolysis

15
17

2.5.1.1 Salts from Strong Acid and Strong Bases

17

2.5.1.2 Salts from Weak Acid and Strong Bases

18

2.5.1.3 Salts from Strong Acid and Weak Bases


18

2.5.1.4 Salts from Weak Acid and Weak Bases

18

2.5.2 Determining the pH of Salt Solution

19

2.5.2.1 Salts of Strong Acid and Weak Bases

20

2.5.2.2 Salts of Weak Acid and Strong Bases

21

2.5.2.3 Salts of Weak Acid and Weak Bases

22

2.5.3 The Relation Between Kh with Kw, Ka and Kb

23

2.5.3.1 Salts of Strong Acid and Weak Bases

23

2.5.3.2 Salts of Weak Acid and Strong Bases

24

2.5.3.3 Salts of Weak Acid and Weak Bases

25

2.5.4 Salt Hydrolysis in Daily Life

25

CHAPTER III RESEARCH METHODS

27

3.1 Overview of the Research

27

3.2 Research Location and Research Objects

28

3.3 Population and Sample

28

3.4 Research Instrument

29

3.5 Technique of the Data Collection

30

3.6 Technique of the Data Analysis

30

CHAPTER IV RESULT AND DISCUSSION

32

4.1 Description Result

32

4.2 Students’ Achievement

32

4.3 Students’ Understanding

33

4.3.1 Salt Hydrolysis Defition

34

4.3.2 Formation of Salt Hydrolysis

36

4.3.3 Determining the pH of Salt Solution

39

4.3.4 The Relation between Kh with Kw, Ka, and Kb

45

4.3.5 Application of Salt Hydrolysis in Daily Life

51

4.4 Discussion

56

CHAPTER V CONCLUSIONS AND SUGGESTIONS

58

5.1 Conclusions

58

5.2 Suggestions

59

REFERENCES

60

TABLE LIST
Table 2.1 The Grouping Degree of Comprehension Concept

9

Table 2.2 Kinds of Misconception

10

Table 2.3 Property of Salt Hydrolysis

17

Table 3.1 The Description of Population and Sample in Senior High School that
Selected as Sample in the Study For Analyzing of Students
Misconception on Salt Hydrolysis Chemistry ay Senior High School
in Padangsidimpuan

29

Table 4.1 The Average of Students’ Achievements

32

Table 4.2 Grouping Criteria based on students’ achievement for each school

33

Table 4.3 Number of students for aech group based on students’ acievement

33

Table 4.4 Question 4 and its answer in SHCMT

35

Table 4.5 Percentage of students’ responses for question number 4 in SHCMT 36
Table 4.6 Question 2 and its answer in SHCMT

37

Table 4.7 Percentage of students’ responses for question number 2 in SHCMT 38
Table 4.8. Question 5 and its answer in SHCMT

38

Table 4.9 Percentage of students’ responses for question number 5 in SHCMT 39
Table 4.10 Question 8 and its answer in SHCMT

40

Table 4.11 Percentage of students’ responses for question number 8 in
SHCMT
Table 4.12 Question 10 and its answer in SHCMT

41
42

Table 4.13 Percentage of students’ responses for question number 10 in
SHCMT
Table 4.14 Qusetion 17 and its answer in SHCMT

43
44

Table 4.15 Percentage of students’ responses for question number 17 in
SHCMT
Table 4.16 Question 6 and its answer in SHCMT

45
46

Table 4.17 Percentage of students’ responses for question number 6 in
SHCMT
Table 4.18 Question 19 and its answer in SHCMT

47
48

Table 4.19 Percentage of students’ responses for question number 19
in SHCMT
Table 4.20 Question 20 and its answer in SHCMT

49
50

Table 4.21 Percentage of students’ responses for question number 20
in SHCMT
Table 4.22 Qusetion 12 and its answer in SHCMT

51
52

Table 4.23 Percentage of students’ responses for question number 12
in SHCMT

53

Table 4.24 The Frequency of correct response to Salt Hydrolysis
Chemistry Misconception Test
Table 4.25 Percentage of Students Misconceptions

53
54

Table 4.26 Common Misconceptions of Salt Hydrolysis held by
Senior High School Students Grade XI (n=165)

55

APPENDIX LIST
Appendix 1 Concept analysis of chemistry for Senior High School
Eleventh Grade Matter : Salt Hydrolysis

64

Appendix 2 The lattice of problems Salt Hydrolysis Chemistry

67

Appendix 3 Salt Hydrolysis Chemistry Misconception Test Before Validation 68
Appendix 4 Salt Hydrolysis Chemistry Misconception Test After Validation

74

Appendix 5 Key Answer of Salt Hydrolysis Chemistry Misconception Test

80

Appendix 6 Teachers’ Data Form

81

Appendix 7 Data of Students’ Achievement in School A

82

Appendix 8 Data of Students’ Achievement in School B

83

Appendix 9 Data of Students’ Achievement in School C

84

Appendix 10 Data of Students’ Achievement in School D

85

Appendix 11 Data of Students’ Achievement in School E

86

Appendix 12 Data of Students’ Achievement in School F

87

Appendix 13 The Percentage of Students’ Responses

88

Appendix 14 Table of Learning Source in each Senior High School

89

Appendix 15 Documentations90

CHAPTER I
INTRODUCTION
1.1 The Background of Study
Basically the development and progress of a nation is influenced by the
quality of education of the nation itself. Education is a strategic tool and a vehicle
for human resource development. Therefore, education should receive serious
attention and handling. On the other hand the manager of education has taken
great care to increase the quality of education to improve student achievement by
optimizing the educational resources available.
One of the main factors that determine the quality of education of a nation
is a teacher. Current assignment and the teacher's role is getting harder, along with
the development of science and technology. Teachers which is at the forefront of
creating quality human resources. Teachers face to face with the learners in the
classroom through the learning process. In the other hand teachers will be
generated qualified students, both academically, skill (skills), emotional maturity,
and moral and spiritual.
Learning is an active process, and what students do with facts and ideas
with which they have been presented depends to a very high degree on what they
already think and believe. Being able to recognize and work with these studentheld ideas and conceptions is thus a key component of an effective educational
strategy (Mulfrod and Robinson, 2002).
When learning science at school students sometimes relate their prior
knowledge to what teacher explain innappropriately, and hence the meanings or
concepts they construct are incorrect, incomplete or ineffective to explain the
scientific phenomena (Osborne and Wittrock, 1983, cited in Pinarbasi et all,
2009).

In essence, the success in the learning process is not only determined by
the accuracy of teachers in choosing the method used, the independence of
students in their learning also has a very large role. Independent learning does not
mean learning alone but learning that relies on the activities and responsibilities of
the student to achieve learning success. Independence of the student in question is
the attitude of students to not depend on others for every problem facing learning.
Students are required to be able to resolve an issue with the ability to learn and
their own efforts so that students with high self-reliance can obtain better
performance.
Chemistry is sometimes viewed as a difficult subject. It requires students
to go between (1) macroscopic representations that describe properties of tangible
and visible phenomena in the everyday experiences of learners, (2)
submicroscopic (or molecular) representations that provide explanations at the
particulate level in which matter is described as being composed of atoms,
molecules and ions, and (3) symbolic (or ionic) representations that involve the
use of chemical symbols, formulas and equations, as well as every media that
symbolize matter (chandrasegaran et all, 2007).
Most chemistry teaching operates at the macro (or laboratory) level and
the symbolic level, but it’s known that many misconceptions in chemistry stem
from an inability to visualize structures and processes at the submicroscopic level
(Tasker and Dalton).
According to Fask et all (in Wiseman, 1981:41) that largely concepts in
chemistry is the abstract concept and generally is the get ladder concepts which
develop from the simple to complex (Sastrawijaya, 1988:45). The learning result
that expected based on the aims is the students can understanding the concepts
that was learn correctly and concern the concept that was have before and can
apply that concepts in daily life and also in technology. To get the aims,
sometimes the students feel a lot of obstruction. Students try to interpreted or
create self concepts based on their experience that sometimes not appropriate with

the true concept, so cause the wrong concept in students thinking, the wrong
concepts called as misconceptions by Fisher (Griffith).
Students that through misconceptions not realise that their was through
misconception, because the students look the concept which was have is a true
concept. This case will effect to understanding the students in the future where in
a material will effect learning handicap in other material. Because every concept
has the relevance with other concept.
Identifying misconception of students is the first

step for preventing

misconceptions in chemistry. The identification of the students’ understandings
and misconceptions has been the goal of many of the studies carried out over the
last years (Ozmen, 2004). Some of the conceptual areas in which most studies
havebeen conducted are chemical equilibrium (Erdemir et al.,2000; Sendur et al.,
2010; Husseini, 2011), acid-base (Ross and Munby, 1991; Kousathana et al.,
2005; Sheppard, 2006), chemical bonding (Peterson et al., 1986; Coll and Taylor,
2002; Ozmen, 2004; Smith and Nakhleh, 2011), nuclear chemistry (Nakibog˘Lu
and Tekin, 2006), atomic orbital and hybridization (Nakiboglu, 2003),
buffersolution (Orgil and Sutherland, 2008), solutions and their components
(Çalık and Ayas, 2005; Pinarbasi and Canpolat, 2003), colligative properties
(Pinarbasi et al.,2009), thermochemistry (Azliandry, 2007) and electrochemistry
(Sanger and Greenbowe, 1999; Huddle and White, 2000) (Zainuddin Muchtar and
Harizal, 2012). Actually, the basic of a research education is a curriculum,
because from the curriculum is the basic of education. All of the teaching and
learning process is based on the curriculum. From this curriculum we can know
the matter, and then make a syllabus of the matter, the teaching and learning
process in classroom be guided by syllabus, so that from them we can know the
some problem that had been around by students. Because of that, in this research
the writer showed the Concept Analysis in Salt Hydrolysis (Appendix 1).
As has already been worded above, there are several topic in chemical one
is hard to be understood by student. There is even one of topic which intended is

hydrolysis. Topic from hydrolysis constitutes one of topic which need
comprehension and integration of there are many chemical introduction
knowledge. Hydrolysis is one of topic that can work out the misconception.
Because some students can’t differrent which one hydrolysis and which one the
buffer solution. Two of them if we glanced it closed resemblance, so that some of
students can do some misconception in this topic. Usually student gets to get new
science after they study it without understands it.

This case can make a

misconceptions.
Therefore, in this case the researcher chose the research entitled
Analyzing of Students’ Misconception on Salt Hydrolysis Chemistry at
Senior High School in Padangsidempuan. This research aims to investigate the
students’

misconceptions

about

hydrolysis

at

senior

high

school

in

Padangsidempuan.
1.2 The Problem Identifications
Based on the background above, the identification of problem formulated as
follows:
1. Most students have some difficulties in understanding chemistry concept
especially for Salt Hydrolysis.
2. There are incompatibilities between students’ concepts and true concepts.
1.3 Scope of the research
The scopes of this research are:
1. In this study is limited to investigate the misconception of senior high
school students.
2. The sample is limited to students’ year XI.
3. The matter is limited to “Salt Hydrolysis "

1.4 Problem Statements
The problem statements of this research are:
1. What are the type of subconcept in hydrolysis that make students’
misconceptions?
2. What is the percentage of students’ misconception about Salt Hydrolysis?
1.5 Research Objectives
The objectives of this research are:
1. To identify the types of subconcept in hydrolysis that make students’
misconceptions.
2. To identify the percentage of students’ misconception about Salt
Hydrolysis.

1.6 Research Significances
This study is expected as follows:
1. To be an information about students’ misconception about Salt
Hydrolysis.
2. To be an input to improve the quality teaching and learning chemistry
especially about Salt Hydrolysis in senior high school.
3. For researcher through this research expected can be an experience to
know students’ misconception.

CHAPTER V
CONCLUSIONS AND SUGGESTIONS
5.1. Conclusions
1. Analysis of students misconceptions on salt hydrolysis using Salt
Hydrolysis Chemistry Misconception Test showed that there were
some issues from five main concepts of salt hydrolysis chemistry,
the name of the concepts is salt hydrolysis definition, formation of
salt hydrolysis, determining the pH of salt solution, the relation
between Kh with Kw, Ka, and Kb, and the application of salt
hydrolysis in daily life. The percentage of students misconceptions
for five main concept is 26.06%; 27.07%; 23,54%; 29.78%; and
25.76%.
2. Analysis of students’ responses showed that there were three areas
as the main problems in fomation of students misconceptions
namely, fragmentation of students’ understanding, problems with
symbols

and

mathematical

formula,

and

problems

in

generalizations.
3. From analysis of data the students have more difficulties in the
determining the pH salt of solution, the relation between Kh with
Kw, Ka, and Kb, and the application of salt hydrolysis in daily life
concept.
4. From analysis of students’ misconceptions on salt hydrolysis
chemistry topic using Salt Hydrolysis Chemistry Misconception
Test showed the different understanding from each school. Beside
that, from students response in Salt Hydrolysis Chemistry
Misconception Test, also can see that the different in answering
question from foreign school and private school. Actually, the
school in High Group also can had been around misconceptions.

5.2. Suggestions
From the data of students’ misconceptions on salt hydrolysis
chemistry identified in this study, it is suggested for senior high school
teachers to do the diagnostic misconceptions into students’ after the each
of subject material done learning. So that, can detect the students’
misconceptions early. Beside that, teachers advasible observe the prior
knowledge of the students before teaching and learning process do.
Teachers also must give a variation in their teaching methods to make the
concepts that learn better. And for more, teachers hope give more example
of application concept that learnen. For better learning, advisable the
teacher must called up again about the relation between molarity and the
pH, also about the symbols which use in the subject matter that will learn.
Further investigations about students’ misconceptions on salt
hydrolysis chemistry topic are suggested using various methods to get
better data analysis. Considering the importance in collecting the data of
students’ misconceptions, it is also suggested for other reasearchers to
investigate students’ misconceptions for other topics in chemistry subject.

REFERENCES
Abraham, M.R., Grzybowski, E.B., Renner, J. & Marek, E.A.,

(1992),

Understanding and Misunderstanding of Eight Grades of Five Chemistry
Concept in Text Book, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(12),
105-120
Alwan, Ahmad Arif., (2010), Hidrolisis Garam Dalam Kehidupan Sehari-hari:
http://www.arifalwan04.blogspot.com/2012/04/hidrolisis-garam-dalamkehidupan-sehari.html akses January 2012.
Arends, R.I., (2001), Models of Teaching 5thed, Singapore, Mc Graw Hill.
Carter, S., and Brickhouse, N., (1989), What makes chemistry difficult? Journal of
Chemical Education, 66, 223-225.
Chandrasegaran, A.L., Treagust, D.F., and Mocerino, M., (2007), The
Development of A Two-Tier Multiple-Choice Diagnostic Instrument for
Evaluating secondary School Students’ Ability to Describe and Explain
Chemical Reactions Using Multiple Levels of Representation, Chemistry
Education Research and Practice, 8(3): 293-307.
Commor, Raymond. F. O., (1974), Chemical Principles and Their Biological
Implication , United States of America, Hamilton Publishing Company.
Gabel, D., (1996, July), The complexity of chemistry: Research for teaching in the
21st century. Paper presented at the 14th International Conference on
Chemical Education. Brisbane, Australia.
Gerard, D. T., Ed, V.D.B., (1993), (Cultural Factors in the Origin and
Remediation of Alternative Conceptions, Proceedings August 1993).
Griffiths, A.K., (1994), A Critical Analysis and Synthesis of Research on
Students’ Chemistry Mis-conceptions’, in H.J. Schmidt (ed.) Problem
Solving and Misconceptions in Chemistry and Physics, ICASE, pp. 70–79.
Herron, D., (1996), The chemistry classroom, Washington, American Chemical
Society.
Harizal, (2012), Analyzing of Students’ Misconception on Acid-Base Chemistry at
Senior High Schools in Medan, Thesis, Mathematic and Natural Science
Faculty, State University of Medan, Medan.

Hartana, Crys Fajar., (2001), Buku Materi Pokok Kimia Fisika II, Jakarta,
Universitas Terbuka.
Hartati, A., (2010), Analisis Miskonsepsi Siswa dan Cara Mengatasinya Pada
Pokok Bahasan Struktur Atom, Skripsi, Fakultas Matematika dan Ilmu
Pengetahuan Alam, Universitas Negeri Medan, Medan.
Husseini, A., (2011), Analyzing of Students’ Misconception on Chemical
Equilibrium At Senior High School in Medan, Thesis, Mathematic and
Natural Science Faculty, State University of Medan, Medan.
J. Sanger, M., and Thomas J. Greenbow., (1997), Students’ Misconceptions in
Electrochemistry: Current Flow in Electrolyte Solutions and the Salt
Bridge, Journal of Chemical Education, 74 (7) : 232-233.
Johari, J. M. C., M. Rachmawati, (2010), Chemistry for Senior High School
Grade XI, Jakarta, Esis.
Joyce, Bruce and Weill Marsha., (1980), Model of Teaching, New Jersey,
Prentice-Hall.
Keenan, Charles. W., (1980), Kimia Untuk Universitas, Jakarta, Erlangga.
Muchtar, Z., and Harizal., (2012), Analyzing of Students’ Misconceptions on
Acid-Base Chemistry at Senior High School in Medan, Journal of
Education and Practice, ISSN 2222-1735 (Paper) ISSN 2222-288X
(Online), 3 (15) : 65-74.
Mulford, D. R., Robinson, W. R, (2002), An Inventory for Alternate Conceptions
among First-Semester General Chemistry Students, Journal of Chemical
Education 79 (6): 739-744.
Nakhleh, Mary., (1992), Why Some Students Don't Learn Chemistry, Journal of
Chemical Education 3 (69): 191-196.
Octavia, R. S., (2012), Analisis Miskonsepsi Siswa SMA Kelas X Pada Pokok
Bahasan Ikatan Kimia di Kecamatan Bandar Tahun Ajaran 2011/2012,
Skripsi, Fakultas Matematika dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam, Universitas
Negeri Medan, Medan.
Ozmen, H., (2004), Some student misconceptions in chemistry: A literature
review of chemical bonding, Journal of Science Education and
Technology (JRST), 13 ( 2), JunePavelich, M, B. Jenkins, J. Birk, R.Baue

Paul, Suparno., (1997), Filsafat Konstruktivisme Dalam Pendidikan, Penerbit
Kanisius, Yogyakarta.
Pinarbasi, T., Sozbilir, M., & Canpolat, N., (2009), Prospective Chemistry
Teachers’ Misconceptions about Colligative Properties: Boiling Point
Elevation andFreezing Point Depression,Chemistry Education Research
and Practice, 10, 273–280.
Purtadi, S and Rr. Lis Permana Sari, Analisis Miskonsepsi Laju dan
Kesetimbangan Kimia Pada Siswa SMA, Jurnal Jurusan Kimia FMIPAUNY.
Purtadi, Sukisman., Rr. Lis Permana Sari (2008).
Pengembangan Dan
Implementasi Tes Chemistry Concept Inventory
Berbasis Multimedia
Sebagai Instrumen Dalam Identifikasi Dan Remediasi Miskonsepsi
Konsep-Konsep Kimia Pada Siswa SMA Laporan Penelitian. Tidak
Dipublikasikan.
Posner, G. J., Strike, K. A., Hewson, P. W., and Gertzog, W. A., (1982),
Accomodation of a Scientific Conception: Toward a Theory of Conceptual
Change, Science Education, 66 (2): 211-227.
Raghvan, P. S., and M. S. Sethi., (1997), Concepts and Problems in Physical
Chemistry, New Delhi, Discovery Publishing House.
Sanger, M.J., and Greenbowe, T.J., (1999), An Analysis of College Chemistry
Textbooks as Sources of Misconceptions and Errors in Electrochemistry,
Journal of Chemical Education, 76 (6): 853-860.
Simamora, M., and I Wayan Redhana., (2007)., Identifikasi Miskonsepsi Guru
Kimia Pada Pembelajaran Konsep Struktur Atom, Jurnal Penelitian dan
Pengembangan Pendidika, 1 (2): 148-160.
Sheppard, K., (2006), High School Students’ Understanding of Titration and
Related Acid-Base Phenomena, Chemistry Education Research and
Practice, 7 (1): 32-45.
Skelly, K. M. & Hall, D. (1993). The development and validation of a
categorization of sources of misconceptions in chemistry. Paper presented
at the Third International Seminar on Misconceptions and Educational
Strategies in science and Mathematics (Ithaca, August).

Suparjo, (2008), Analisis Miskonsepsi Siswa Kelas X SMA Pada Pokok Bahasan
Ikatan Kimia, Skripsi, Fakultas Matematika dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam,
Universitas Negeri Medan, Medan.
Susilowati, Endang., (2009), Theory and Application of Chemistry 2, Solo, Tiga
Serangkai.
Suyanta, Sukisman Purtadi, dan Rr. Lis Permana Sari (2007). Identifikasi
Pemahaman Konsep Kimia Kelas XI SMA Dengan Menggunakan
Demonstrasi Clock Reaction Terstuktur. Laporan Penelitian. Tidak
Dipublikasikan.
Tasker, R., and Dalton, R., (2006), Research into Practice: Visualization of the
Molecular World Using Animations, Chemistry Education Research and
Practice, 7 (2): 141-159.
Van den Berg, Euwe., (1990)., Konsep, Peta Konsep, Konsepsi dan Miskonsepsi,
Makalah., Jurusan Kependidikan Matematika dan IPA UKSW Salatiga.