THE CONTENT VALIDITY OF THE ENGLISH FINAL TEST ITEMS IN UN SMK DWIJA DHARMA BOYOLALI 2010-2011 ACADEMIC YEAR The Content Validity Of The English Final Test Items In UN SMK Dwija Dharma Boyolali 2010-2011 Academic Year Based On School Based Curriculum And

THE CONTENT VALIDITY OF THE ENGLISH FINAL TEST ITEMS IN
UN SMK DWIJA DHARMA BOYOLALI 2010-2011 ACADEMIC YEAR
BASED ON SCHOOL BASED CURRICULUM
AND THE DISTRIBUTION OF THEIR COGNITIVE LEVEL

RESEARCH PAPER
Submitted as Partial Fulfillment of the Requirement
for Getting Bachelor Degree of Education
in English Department

by
DEWI ENDAH MURDININGSIH
A.320 080 029

SCHOOL OF TEACHER TRANING AND EDUCATION
MUHAMMADIYAH UNIVERSITY OF SURAKARTA
2012
i

APPROVAL

APPROVAL

THE CONTENT VALIDITY OF THE ENGLISH FINAL TEST ITEMS

THE
CONTET{T
YALIDITY
OT'THE
ENGLISH
X'TNAL
TEST ITEMS
IN UN
SMK DWIJA
DHARMA
BOYOLALI
2010-2011
ACADEMIC
YEAR
IN T'N SMK DWIJA
DHARMA

BOYOLALI
ACADEMIC YEAR
BASED
ON SCHOOL
BASED2010.2011
CURRICULUM
ON SCHOOL BASED
ANDBASED
THE DISTRIBUTION
OF THEIR
COGNITIVE LEVEL
CURRICT}LI]M
AI\ID THE DISTRIBUTION OF THEIR COGNITIVE LEVEL
RESEARCH PAPER

RESEARCH PAPER

by

byMURDININGSIH

DEWI ENDAH
A 320 080 029

DEWI ENDAII MT'RDII\INGSIH
A320 080 029

Approved to be Examined by Consultant

Approved to be Examined by Consultant

Second Consultant

First Consultant

Second Consultant

FirstConsultant

Q*

Dra. Dwi Haryanti, M. Hum.

Drs. Djoko Srijono, M.Hum.

NIK.477

NIP.19590601 198503 1 003

Dra.Ilwi Harvanti. M. Hum.

Drs. Dioko Sriiono. M.Hum.

I\IIIC477

I\m.19590601 198503 1 003
ii

ACCEPTANCE

ACCEPTANCE

Accepted and Approved by Board of Examiner
Accepted and d.pproved by Board of Examiner
School of Teacher Training and Education
School of Teacher Training and Education
Muhammadiyah University of Surakarta

Muhammadiyah Univorsity of Surakarta
on June…2012

,*;or"e6lhrz

Team of Examiner:

Team of Examiner:
1. Drs. Djoko Srijono M. Hum.

l.

(

Drs.NIP.
Djoko
Sriiono198503
M. Hum.
19590601
1 003

{),a

)

19590601
198s03 1003
NIP.(Chair
Person)

(Chair
2. Dra.Person)
Dwi Haryanti, M. Hum.

2,

(

)

(

)

DraNIK.
Dwi 477
Haryanti, M. HrxnI)
NIIC(Member
477
3. Drs. H. Maryadi, MA
(Member
I)

3.

( ,1r-rl*14

NIP. 19580304 198603 1 001

Drs. H. Maryadi,

MA

(Member II)
NrP, 1e580304 198603

(MembcrII)

l00l
Dean,

Drs. H. Sofyan Anif, M.Si
NIK.547

iii

)

TESTIMONY

TESTIMONY
Herewith, I testify that in this research paper, there is no plagiarism of the

Herewiflu
I testiS
in this
no plagiadsm
previous
literary
workihd
which
has reffirch
been raised

to there
obtainisbachelor
degreeofofths
a
lraper,
p,rerrious
literary
university,
norwork
therervhich
are opinions
or masterpieces
whichbachelor
have been
written
has been
raised to obtain
degree
ofora

published
others,
except those
in which thewhicb
writing
are beeir
referred
in the
uriversiry,
the,re
mr by
rc opinions
or masterpieec
have
uriueir
or
manuscript
and mentioned
literary
bibliography.
ptblished
by olhers,
excrytinttross
inreview
whichand
the
writing are referred

in

thc

Hence,
later, ifinit is proven that are some untrue statements in this
manuscript aad
mediod
literry review md bibliogr@y;
testimony, I will be fully responsible.
He,oc€L latcr, if it is pronen tlw

ac soee untuc statetrcnts in this

tastimony, I l1,ill be fully rcsponsible.

Surakarta, June

2012

Dewi Endah Murdiningsih
A.320 080 029

A.320 080 029

iv

MOTTO

ْ َ◌ َ◌ ‫ِا◌نﱠ‬
ً ◌ْ ◌ُ ◌ِ ◌ْ ◌ُ ◌‫ا‬
‫ر◌ا‬
Hai Orang-Orang yang beriman! Mintalah Pertolongan dengan Sabar dan
Tetap Menegakkan Sholat, Sesungguhnya Allah Menyertai Orang-Orang yang
Sabar.
(Qs. Al-Baqarah: 153)
Kekuatan Terdasyat dari Seorang Pemimpin adalah Keteladanan.
( The Writer)

v

DEDICATION

!

! "#

$

%

&

'(

(

)

'

vi

(*$

LIST OF ABBREVIATION

01

: Number of Items

UAN : Name of Test Items
DD

: Name of School

vii

ANKNOWLEDGMENT

Assalamu’alaikum Wr.Wb.
Alhamdulillahirobbil’alamin. Praise and gratitude to Allah SWT,

The Lord of Universe, The Merciful and Compassionate, thanks for
continuing to guide her life, His blessing and guidance support her
finishing this research paper. Praise and invocation are presented to
Prophet Muhammad Saw, who has led people to the right way.
The writer would like to express her sincere gratitude for all of
people who give contribution to make this research paper more
complete. Without their contribution the writer is likely impossible to
finish it. The writer is indebted all of them. Therefore, on this
opportunity she would like to express her special and deepest gratitude and
appreciation to:
1. Drs. H. Sofyan Anif, M. Si., as the Dean of the School of Teacher
Training and Education of Muhammadiyah University,
2. Titis Setyabudi, S. Si, M. Hum., Head of English Department of FKIP
UMS,
3. Drs. Djoko Srijono, M.Hum., as the first consultant who has given
guidance and correction in doing and finishing the research paper,
4. Dra. Dwi Haryanti, M.Hum., as the second consultant, for his great
helpful guidance of this research paper,

viii

.i

5.

:,
The writers’ family who have given her prayer and motivation,

5. Th,
srttprs'
6. All
the writer
friend’s,
urb hvc gil,w
&mily

hcr prayer

M

mtirdioe"

,
7. All
Lectures’
in English
Department of Surakarta,
6. ',,Afl
&e ofwritcr
&im-fg,

h@&ry

in Muhammadiyah University
of Surakarta.
8. Librarian
7., AIl
ofl*ctlrss!
of$urdrar{a,,
This
research paper is far from perfect, therefore,
8. Li.wuil.iu M@a@re.
UnA lry- of $u*arto"

,

accepts all of the criticism for her research paper.
This rc-$6srch ffiry 4*
, Slae&rc,

fu

Wassalamu’alaikum. Wr. Wb
k
@:Softlussi

the writer

tk

,1ry1m.

Surakarta, June

2012

Dewi Endah Murdiningsih

20t2

ix

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

Dewi Endah Murdiningsih. A. 320 080 029. THE CONTENT VALIDITY OF THE
YALIDITY
OF TIIE
320 080IN029.
Endal Murdini*grih.
DewiENGLISH
FINAL TESTA*ITEMS
UNTHE
SMKCONTENT
DWIJA DHARMA
BOYOLALI
BOYOLALI
DHARMA
DWIJA BASED
IN UN SMK
TEST ITEMS
f'INAL
SNGLISH
2010-2011
ACADEMIC
YEAR BASED
ON SCHOOL
CURRICULUM
BASEI}
CURRICT}LUM
SCHOOT
BASEI}
ON
YEAR
ACAI}EMIC
2010-2011
AND THE
DISTRIBUTION OF THEIR COGNITIVE LEVEL. Muhammadiyah
LEVEL. *ITThAmmAdiy-*h
OF THEIR
THE DISTRIBUTION
ANDUniversity
of Surakarta. Research
Paper.COGI\TITIYE
2012
Paper.2$12
Research
Theafaim
of the research
is to describe
the content validity of the English Final Test
Suraksrt*.
University
Test
Englishyear
Final
of the
the content validity
in of
UNtheSMK
DWIJA
DHARMA
2010-2011
academic
based
Itemsaim
is to
describe BOYOLALI
research
The
year based
on in
School
basedDWIJA
Curriculum.
The content
validity2$A-2011
is seen from
the distribution
of
academic
BOYOIALI
DHARMA
Items
UN SMK
their
cognitive
level.
of
&om
is
the
distribution
validity
seer
The
conGnt
on Schoal based Curriculun
The
data
sourceof
the
research
are
the
English
Final
test
items
in
UN
SMK
their cognitive level.
DWIJA
DHARMA
2010-2011
academicFinal
year. test
There
are 35
for
in items
items
t/N SMK
are the English
the research
The
data
sourceofBOYOLALI
each
of
administration
and
the
total
of
the
test
are
105
items.
This
research
used
DWIJA DI{ARMA BOYOLALI 2OLO-2O11 academic year. There are 35 items for
two parameters in this research based on School based Curriculum and the
each of administration and the total of the test are 105 items. This research used
of their cognitive level by Bloom’s Taxonomy. In analyzing the data,
parameters in this research based on Sehool based Curriculum and the
twodistribution
the writer uses interpretation method. The research describe the English Final test
distribution of their cognitive level by Bloom's Taxonomy.In analyzing the data,
items in UN SMK DWIJA DHARMA BOYOLALI 2010-2011 academic year based
uses interpretation method. The research describe the English Final test
the writer
on School
based Curriculum. and the distribution of their cognitive level in
items
in UN Taxonomy.
SMK DWIJA DHARMA BOYOLALI 20L0-2011 academic year based
Bloom’s
cogn,itive
level
aad the distribut-iou
on School
The based
processCurr-iculunr
of the data collecting
technique in of
thistheir
research
are taken
fromin
TaxonomyBloom's
document
of English Final test items in UN SMK DWIJA DHARMA BOYOLALI
proeess
of the year.
data collecting technique in this research are taken from
The
2010-2011 academic
DWIJA of
DHARMA
itemsthat
inthe
tI{Content
SMK Validity
testshows
document
English
Theofresult
of thisFinal
research
the EnglishBOYOLALI
Final Test
2A10-2011
Items inacademic
UN SMK year.
DWIJA DHARMA BOYOLALI 2010-2011 based on School based
Finalon
Test
of the
English
that the
Content
The result ofyes
thisitresearch
Curriculum,
is does. shows
It is valid
because
it isValidity
correspond
with
indicators
a
syllabus
school.
The data
consist English
Final test items can be
classified
three parts.
based
BOYOLALI2010-2011
based
on School
Iteins
in UNinSIVIK
DWIJA
DHARMA
They are incomplete
dialouge,
andisreading
comprehension.
with indicators on a
yes it is does.
It iserror
validrecognition
because it
correspond
Curriculum,
The
Content
Validity
of
the
English
Final
Test
Items
in
UN SMK
DWIJA
parts.
tlree
syllabus in school. The data consist English Final test items can be classified
BOYOLALI
with
the
Distribution
of
Their
Cognitive
in
School
based
reading
comprehension.
TheyDHARMA
incomplete
error
recognition
and
are
dialouge,
Curriculum,
yes Validity
it does. Itof
is valid.
The items
focusTest
to measure
in Bloom’s
Final
Items all
in oftlNlevel
DWIJA
The Content
the English
SMK
Taxonomy.
DHARMA BOYOLALI with the Dishibution of Their Cognitive in School based
Curriculum, yes it does. It is valid. The items focus to measure all of level in Bloom's
Second Consultant
First Consultant
Taxonomy.
Second Consultant

Dra. Dwi Haryanti, M. Hum
NIK.477

Dr*, Ilwi l{*rryantl M. Huni

Drs. Djoko Srijono, M.Hum.
NIP.19590601 198503 1 003
.
Dean,

NIIC4?7

NrP.1959$6$1 198s$3

Drs. H. Sofyan Anif, M.Si
NIK.547

x

I

0{}3

TABLE OF CONTENT
page

COVER .................................................................................................

i

APPROVAL ..............................................................................................

ii

ACCEPTANCE ....................................................................................

iii

TESTIMONY ........................................................................................

iv

MOTTO ................................................................................................

v

DEDICATION ......................................................................................

vi

LIST OF ABREVIATION ....................................................................

vii

ANKNOWLEDGMENT........................................................................

viii

SUMMARY ...........................................................................................

x

TABLE OF CONTENT ........................................................................

xi

CHAPTER I: INTRODUCTION .........................................................

1

A. Background of the Study .........................................

1

B. Problem Statement ..................................................

3

C. Limitation of the Study ............................................

3

D. Objective of the Study .............................................

4

E. Benefit of the Study .................................................

4

F. Research Paper Organization .................................

6

CHAPTER II: REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE ..................

7

A. Previous Study ........................................................

7

B. Language Testing ...................................................

7

1. Notion of Language Testing ..............................

8

xi

2. Kinds of Test ......................................................

9

3. A Good Test .......................................................

10

C. The Curriculum .......................................................

13

1. Notion of Curriculum ........................................

13

2. Notion of School based Curriculum ..................

13

D. Bloom’s Taxonomy ....................................................

14

CHAPTER III: RESEARCH METHOD .............................................

16

A. Type of the Research .............................................

16

B. Object of the Research ..........................................

16

C. Data and Data Source ...........................................

16

D. Method of Collecting Data ....................................

17

E. Technique for Analyzing Data ..............................

17

CHAPTER IV: RESEARCH FINDING AND DISCUSSION ............

19

A. Research Finding ....................................................

19

B. Discussion ...............................................................

46

CHAPTER V: CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTION..........................

47

A. Conclusion ..............................................................

47

B. Suggestion ...............................................................

47

BIBLIOGRAPHY
APPENDIX

xii

SUMMARY

TIIE
SNGLISH f'INAL TEST ITEMS IN UN SMK DWIJA DHARMA BOYOLALI
2010-2011 ACAI}EMIC YEAR BASEI} ON SCHOOT BASEI} CURRICT}LUM
AND THE DISTRIBUTION OF THEIR COGI\TITIYE LEVEL. *ITThAmmAdiy-*h
Dewi Endal Murdini*grih. A* 320 080 029. THE CONTENT YALIDITY OF

University af Suraksrt*. Research Paper.2$12
The aim of the research is to describe the content validity of the English Final Test
Items in UN SMK DWIJA DHARMA BOYOIALI 2$A-2011 academic year based
on Schoal based Curriculun The conGnt validity is seer &om the distribution of
their cognitive level.
The data sourceof the research are the English Final test items in t/N SMK
DWIJA DI{ARMA BOYOLALI 2OLO-2O11 academic year. There are 35 items for
each of administration and the total of the test are 105 items. This research used
two parameters in this research based on Sehool based Curriculum and the
distribution of their cognitive level by Bloom's Taxonomy.In analyzing the data,
the writer uses interpretation method. The research describe the English Final test
items in UN SMK DWIJA DHARMA BOYOLALI 20L0-2011 academic year based
on School based Curr-iculunr aad the distribut-iou of their cogn,itive level in
Bloom's TaxonomyThe proeess of the data collecting technique in this research are taken from
document of English Final test items in tI{ SMK DWIJA DHARMA BOYOLALI
2A10-2011 academic year.
The result of this research shows that the Content Validity of the English Final Test
Iteins in UN SIVIK DWIJA DHARMA BOYOLALI2010-2011 based on School based
Curriculum, yes it is does. It is valid because it is correspond with indicators on a
syllabus in school. The data consist English Final test items can be classified tlree parts.
They are incomplete dialouge, error recognition and reading comprehension.
The Content Validity of the English Final Test Items in tlN SMK DWIJA
DHARMA BOYOLALI with the Dishibution of Their Cognitive in School based
Curriculum, yes it does. It is valid. The items focus to measure all of level in Bloom's
Taxonomy.
Second Consultant

Dr*, Ilwi l{*rryantl M. Huni
NIIC4?7

NrP.1959$6$1 198s$3

I

0{}3