Determination of Fracture Toughness of small ceramic discs and plate using the ball on three balls test.
Programme
E€I?S
t
:
6
t!^!{E
is:+i
iit
F!
!"ii
5Flit
,r
'* 'Fifl
ttH!
+i*;
iig
ir
iii$i
uili
E
liilt{
r,€
ii!
iiit
EI!19
fB t
;I:P
EIFi
rgi
.trtr-rt!
5Ct{t!
i,li;
ii*{i
algi:t
{uE
f!I
$
iFr
E?!
it*r
.
tgttl
$siii
'r
1F
t!ttE
ir!
1-riF
tFF
!t4t5;
ir;l:
;t!{R
!1iii. t:iiF
ntili "eEit
F
a
!::
t!:
eE
!rt
{
H
:tF
it5:!e
'! !iiE It
i
i.;
F6i
Ei
'iEi
FE+f
3
ii
:il
E
ii[EF
F
F$iii:
[$t I\
tia{
g$
sEgtEFiF FI
rg
F'it f'EEiiF
itattF iF{r;tr
!IE
t
r{riE
!
E
:t
I
cll
$i:
t;:i
{+{i
'ftriii
TiES
l' €-
titf,:
!
'i
i€$i;
'ii$18
r
;iaf! 'E
il ir tt
!E:tld
5
F!i
*i
5i
istF! lr
Eqtti
e "F"
€
E
;
taf
ii5
lFg
r$tiE
}F
Fiit ii
't
E
E
3
ECoS 2015 -r4dr
ieodoGl co6r.ic Fr.@
cdic
sci.lyl
..
ltDttuw&arrlt@$1ffi ieJctdk
lrcal Organising Committee
le&*&NeeA4.lfu*%Frc
Intemational Advisory Board
tud.@ddrerdttuee
;k2
Deternination of fracture totrghngs ofsmall cenmic discs aDd platB Dsitrg
the ball-on-tbree-bslls tesa
Tdia Luber. Stefe R4chc1, TjototdacdeTirlaNindhia:, Srefd SFoblr
\n$itut ffir Shkrur lnd FunklionskeEnik. Monbuiversibel
3700 L€6b€n,
Aufir
k
bh, ler.Tunne.Sftn
5.
Depdnen orVRhdE. tn8leen & I dr)aM I r.teriry.l'nbrm. Ba i. lndone.is
Mr'e'ialsce re' Leoben l-o$lungCmbH, Ro*scebrmle l2,3 00 kokn,Ausma
Ketryods: ball{n-three-bails l€s! Facturc toueiDes, ninjatuied
d@h
ical testirs.
Abstmcl: Fmcnn€ bDghr6s m*wnals on cemic conpo!{ts d mt€rials e
sudly lqfomed on alatively ldge, b&-shap€d specinem (3 r 4 : 45 nm"l), whicb de
ofi€n mEh bissq the conlonents or the eomi ol naterial that is available fron lab scale
prcesing uits, Suitdble sDecinens thu have to be nelfactued spdtely md oflen with
a diff@nt prcc*sing route.Then nicrosb@tft dd theEfoe th€n mechdical b€havior cm
vrry lor tnis reaon. A new nactre ntruelness tesl h pEsenled. w[ich @ be applied to din
di$ or plateihaped sp€cinetr (0.5 m thickrcs). lt is bsd on the ballon-lnree-balls
(B3B) test, which is a bidial srrengd t$l n€ihod Rll-suited fof lhe stength nedwnot
of llin circule discs o! r€cllngdd plates. If the sp€cinec e pepd€d *ith a o@k of well
denned e€onetry, the B3B test @ be used for n&hre tougnness hebu€nenls too. In
dalog/ b tne surfm cmck in flexue (SCF) detho4 atificial semi€lliptical surfrc€ cEks
e inaoduced irlo the enler oflhe discs with a (n@p in.lenter ddre plalicolly dofomed
zone is rnoved by edndine or polishirg. Tnen the sp4ines @ loaded bidiallyin the B3B
t€st jie. The cnck is opeftd in node I duing loading. Ai6 $e tes! the @ck sizes re
n*uEd on the 6etw surfac6. The evalution of stes inlensiry f&tos is basd on finile
elmenl cahdatioN.lir sol$ioG for the Fet@ sEess ed tle seon€tric frclor calcdat€d
fo! pnctic.lly elevel mges of spdmem ed crok dimeNios e provided loeelbo silh
m eftr a&lysis. Tte higt ecmcy of the resdls is d€moNtaied Bine expenmotal dara
sained on vdious tuteials.
M0ilTAl{
ul{vtnstrAl
Determination of fracture toughness
of small ceramic discs and plates
using the ball-on-three-balls test
Tanja Lubel, Stefan Raschel, Tjokorda Gde
Stefan Strobll,
llrta Nindhiar,
qnsdtlt for s!!kb)r und Fuktlonslcdmib Mont nunisldt Lebe., Arstda
,DeparFmnt of Medrail€l Engln4dng, udat"M unlwEity, lhb€En, Ball, hdoaia
:t'4at!ials cent€r Lshen FlRhurc GmbH, L6ben, aLskl:
ECERS XN,
2l -
25, June 2015, Toledo
Motivation
stnndard KFspecimen
Material properties depend
on consolidation and
sintering conditions
available material & components
+
WfiNTED
+
test method for fracturc toughness
applicable to small material pieces
++
-
4rsFK
Principle
ball-on-three-balls test
B3B
test
Knoop
zone:
grind
off
support R"
-(t R- \ F
=,Ia,i,,
)e
K,.="","
yl:,i,;,,)ra
/-\
--xtp"F#
Goals
(1) Fit-formulae for geometric function f
easy evaluation of the tests
further calculations possible
(sub-critical crack groMh, btigue, ...)
(2) Error analysis
.
.
.
('
1olo, Poisson's ratio!!!)
errors from B3B test
errors from cmck position
errors from crack shape determination
(3) Experimental validation
-
4ISFK
Parametric FEM simulations
disc & f
full 3D FEM model
support radius
IdE 0.4
AE 0.05
EE 0,1
0.1
tl
Db
0.6
0.5
0.10
0.2
0.2
0.15
aa t
,']=
0.3
200GPa
F
\R'R' ) -T
6, F...
K, along the crack
result of FEl4 simulation
front
cc,
c*
4
t=
non-symmetric
poisition of maximum depends on
crack shape
Poisson's ratio
-
0.4
8mm
R \
"....Gi
a
0.8
D= 2R
f-(r
l
-.--e .v
K\
0.7
0.2
0,3
13.8s6mm 20mm
,,(
&
c
0.15 and 4R.= 0.2
-
Ya= Y(a=0o)
rc=maxr(85"
E€I?S
t
:
6
t!^!{E
is:+i
iit
F!
!"ii
5Flit
,r
'* 'Fifl
ttH!
+i*;
iig
ir
iii$i
uili
E
liilt{
r,€
ii!
iiit
EI!19
fB t
;I:P
EIFi
rgi
.trtr-rt!
5Ct{t!
i,li;
ii*{i
algi:t
{uE
f!I
$
iFr
E?!
it*r
.
tgttl
$siii
'r
1F
t!ttE
ir!
1-riF
tFF
!t4t5;
ir;l:
;t!{R
!1iii. t:iiF
ntili "eEit
F
a
!::
t!:
eE
!rt
{
H
:tF
it5:!e
'! !iiE It
i
i.;
F6i
Ei
'iEi
FE+f
3
ii
:il
E
ii[EF
F
F$iii:
[$t I\
tia{
g$
sEgtEFiF FI
rg
F'it f'EEiiF
itattF iF{r;tr
!IE
t
r{riE
!
E
:t
I
cll
$i:
t;:i
{+{i
'ftriii
TiES
l' €-
titf,:
!
'i
i€$i;
'ii$18
r
;iaf! 'E
il ir tt
!E:tld
5
F!i
*i
5i
istF! lr
Eqtti
e "F"
€
E
;
taf
ii5
lFg
r$tiE
}F
Fiit ii
't
E
E
3
ECoS 2015 -r4dr
ieodoGl co6r.ic Fr.@
cdic
sci.lyl
..
ltDttuw&arrlt@$1ffi ieJctdk
lrcal Organising Committee
le&*&NeeA4.lfu*%Frc
Intemational Advisory Board
tud.@ddrerdttuee
;k2
Deternination of fracture totrghngs ofsmall cenmic discs aDd platB Dsitrg
the ball-on-tbree-bslls tesa
Tdia Luber. Stefe R4chc1, TjototdacdeTirlaNindhia:, Srefd SFoblr
\n$itut ffir Shkrur lnd FunklionskeEnik. Monbuiversibel
3700 L€6b€n,
Aufir
k
bh, ler.Tunne.Sftn
5.
Depdnen orVRhdE. tn8leen & I dr)aM I r.teriry.l'nbrm. Ba i. lndone.is
Mr'e'ialsce re' Leoben l-o$lungCmbH, Ro*scebrmle l2,3 00 kokn,Ausma
Ketryods: ball{n-three-bails l€s! Facturc toueiDes, ninjatuied
d@h
ical testirs.
Abstmcl: Fmcnn€ bDghr6s m*wnals on cemic conpo!{ts d mt€rials e
sudly lqfomed on alatively ldge, b&-shap€d specinem (3 r 4 : 45 nm"l), whicb de
ofi€n mEh bissq the conlonents or the eomi ol naterial that is available fron lab scale
prcesing uits, Suitdble sDecinens thu have to be nelfactued spdtely md oflen with
a diff@nt prcc*sing route.Then nicrosb@tft dd theEfoe th€n mechdical b€havior cm
vrry lor tnis reaon. A new nactre ntruelness tesl h pEsenled. w[ich @ be applied to din
di$ or plateihaped sp€cinetr (0.5 m thickrcs). lt is bsd on the ballon-lnree-balls
(B3B) test, which is a bidial srrengd t$l n€ihod Rll-suited fof lhe stength nedwnot
of llin circule discs o! r€cllngdd plates. If the sp€cinec e pepd€d *ith a o@k of well
denned e€onetry, the B3B test @ be used for n&hre tougnness hebu€nenls too. In
dalog/ b tne surfm cmck in flexue (SCF) detho4 atificial semi€lliptical surfrc€ cEks
e inaoduced irlo the enler oflhe discs with a (n@p in.lenter ddre plalicolly dofomed
zone is rnoved by edndine or polishirg. Tnen the sp4ines @ loaded bidiallyin the B3B
t€st jie. The cnck is opeftd in node I duing loading. Ai6 $e tes! the @ck sizes re
n*uEd on the 6etw surfac6. The evalution of stes inlensiry f&tos is basd on finile
elmenl cahdatioN.lir sol$ioG for the Fet@ sEess ed tle seon€tric frclor calcdat€d
fo! pnctic.lly elevel mges of spdmem ed crok dimeNios e provided loeelbo silh
m eftr a&lysis. Tte higt ecmcy of the resdls is d€moNtaied Bine expenmotal dara
sained on vdious tuteials.
M0ilTAl{
ul{vtnstrAl
Determination of fracture toughness
of small ceramic discs and plates
using the ball-on-three-balls test
Tanja Lubel, Stefan Raschel, Tjokorda Gde
Stefan Strobll,
llrta Nindhiar,
qnsdtlt for s!!kb)r und Fuktlonslcdmib Mont nunisldt Lebe., Arstda
,DeparFmnt of Medrail€l Engln4dng, udat"M unlwEity, lhb€En, Ball, hdoaia
:t'4at!ials cent€r Lshen FlRhurc GmbH, L6ben, aLskl:
ECERS XN,
2l -
25, June 2015, Toledo
Motivation
stnndard KFspecimen
Material properties depend
on consolidation and
sintering conditions
available material & components
+
WfiNTED
+
test method for fracturc toughness
applicable to small material pieces
++
-
4rsFK
Principle
ball-on-three-balls test
B3B
test
Knoop
zone:
grind
off
support R"
-(t R- \ F
=,Ia,i,,
)e
K,.="","
yl:,i,;,,)ra
/-\
--xtp"F#
Goals
(1) Fit-formulae for geometric function f
easy evaluation of the tests
further calculations possible
(sub-critical crack groMh, btigue, ...)
(2) Error analysis
.
.
.
('
1olo, Poisson's ratio!!!)
errors from B3B test
errors from cmck position
errors from crack shape determination
(3) Experimental validation
-
4ISFK
Parametric FEM simulations
disc & f
full 3D FEM model
support radius
IdE 0.4
AE 0.05
EE 0,1
0.1
tl
Db
0.6
0.5
0.10
0.2
0.2
0.15
aa t
,']=
0.3
200GPa
F
\R'R' ) -T
6, F...
K, along the crack
result of FEl4 simulation
front
cc,
c*
4
t=
non-symmetric
poisition of maximum depends on
crack shape
Poisson's ratio
-
0.4
8mm
R \
"....Gi
a
0.8
D= 2R
f-(r
l
-.--e .v
K\
0.7
0.2
0,3
13.8s6mm 20mm
,,(
&
c
0.15 and 4R.= 0.2
-
Ya= Y(a=0o)
rc=maxr(85"